Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 5846073, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5846073
Research Article

Electrostatic Switch Function in the Mechanism of Protein Kinase A I Activation: Results of the Molecular Dynamics Simulation

1St. Petersburg State University, Universitetskaya nab. 7/9, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
2Pavlov Institute of Physiology, Russian Academy of Sciences, nab. Makarova 6, St. Petersburg 199034, Russia
3Kyoto Sangyo University, Kamigamo-Motoyama, Kita-ku, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Alexander A. Tokmakov; pj.ca.us-otoyk.cc@kamkot and Vasiliy E. Stefanov; ur.liam@fetsav

Received 6 November 2016; Revised 22 January 2017; Accepted 7 February 2017; Published 7 March 2017

Academic Editor: Serdar Kuyucak

Copyright © 2017 Olga N. Rogacheva et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. E. M. Aandahl, P. Aukrust, B. S. Skålhegg et al., “Protein kinase A type I antagonist restores immune responses of T cells from HIV-infected patients,” FASEB Journal, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 855–862, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. H. Rehmann, B. Prakash, E. Wolf et al., “Structure and regulation of the cAMP-binding domains of Epac2,” Nature Structural Biology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 26–32, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S. M. Harper, H. Wienk, R. W. Wechselberger, J. L. Bos, R. Boelens, and H. Rehmann, “Structural dynamics in the activation of Epac,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 10, pp. 6501–6508, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Badireddy, G. Yunfeng, M. Ritchie et al., “Cyclic AMP analog blocks kinase activation by stabilizing inactive conformation: conformational selection highlights a new concept in allosteric inhibitor design,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 10, no. 3, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. J. Sjoberg, A. P. Kornev, and S. S. Taylor, “Dissecting the cAMP-inducible allosteric switch in protein kinase A RIα,” Protein Science, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1213–1221, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. R. A. Steinberg, M. M. Symcox, S. Sollid, and D. Øgreid, “Arginine 210 is not a critical residue for the allosteric interactions mediated by binding of cyclic AMP to site a of regulatory (RIα) subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 271, no. 44, pp. 27630–27636, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. O. N. Rogacheva, V. E. Stefanov, B. F. Shchegolev, E. A. Vershinina, and E. V. Savvateeva-Popova, “Role of arginine 209 in the conformational transition of the protein kinase A regulatory subunit RIα A-domain,” Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, Article ID 1441005, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. J. Boettcher, J. Wu, C. Kim et al., “Realizing the allosteric potential of the tetrameric protein kinase A RIα holoenzyme,” Structure, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 265–276, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. O. N. Rogacheva, B. F. Shchegolev, V. E. Stefanov, G. A. Zakharov, and E. V. Savvateeva-Popova, “Initiation of the 3′:5′-AMP-induced protein kinase A Iα regulatory subunit conformational transition. Part I. A202 and A326 are critical residues,” Biochemistry (Moscow), vol. 77, no. 5, pp. 456–464, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Kalé, R. Skeel, M. Bhandarkar et al., “NAMD2: greater scalability for parallel molecular dynamics,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 283–312, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. A. D. MacKerell Jr., D. Bashford, M. Bellott et al., “All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 102, no. 18, pp. 3586–3616, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. D. MacKerell Jr., N. Banavali, and N. Foloppe, “Development and current status of the CHARMM force field for nucleic acids,” Biopolymers, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 257–265, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. U. Essmann, L. Perera, M. L. Berkowitz, T. Darden, H. Lee, and L. G. Pedersen, “A smooth particle mesh Ewald method,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 103, no. 19, pp. 8577–8593, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. N. Kannan, J. Wu, G. S. Anand et al., “Evolution of allostery in the cyclic nucleotide binding module,” Genome Biology, vol. 8, no. 12, article R264, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Hamelberg, J. Mongan, and J. A. McCammon, “Accelerated molecular dynamics: a promising and efficient simulation method for biomolecules,” The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 120, no. 24, pp. 11919–11929, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Y. Wang, C. B. Harrison, K. Schulten, and J. A. McCammon, “Implementation of accelerated molecular dynamics in NAMD,” Computational Science and Discovery, vol. 4, no. 1, Article ID 015002, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. Wu, J. M. Jones, N.-H. Xuong, L. F. Ten Eyck, and S. S. Taylor, “Crystal structures of RIα subunit of cyclic adenosine 5′-monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent protein kinase complexed with (Rp)-adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphothioate and (Sp)-adenosine 3′,5′-cyclic monophosphothioate, the phosphothioate analogues of cAMP,” Biochemistry, vol. 43, no. 21, pp. 6620–6629, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. SPSS, SPSS for Windows, Rel. 20.0.0, SPSS, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2011.
  19. W. Humphrey, A. Dalke, and K. J. Schulten, “VMD: visual molecular dynamics,” Journal of Molecular Graphics, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 33–38, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. Rehmann, J. Das, P. Knipscheer, A. Wittinghofer, and J. L. Bos, “Structure of the cyclic-AMP-responsive exchange factor Epac2 in its auto-inhibited state,” Nature, vol. 439, no. 7076, pp. 625–628, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. H. Rehmann, E. Arias-Palomo, M. A. Hadders, F. Schwede, O. Llorca, and J. L. Bos, “Structure of Epac2 in complex with a cyclic AMP analogue and RAP1B,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7209, pp. 124–127, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Su, W. R. G. Dostmann, F. W. Herberg et al., “Regulatory subunit of protein kinase A: structure of deletion mutant with cAMP binding domains,” Science, vol. 269, no. 5225, pp. 807–813, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. Gullingsrud, C. Kim, S. S. Taylor, and J. A. McCammon, “Dynamic binding of PKA regulatory subunit RIα,” Structure, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 141–149, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. K. D. Khanh, K. Teigen, R. Kopperud et al., “Epac1 and cAMP-dependent protein kinase holoenzyme have similar cAMP affinity, but their cAMP domains have distinct structural features and cyclic nucleotide recognition,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 30, pp. 21500–21511, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus