BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2017 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 5893123 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/5893123

Enhancement of Surfactin and Fengycin Production by Bacillus mojavensis A21: Application for Diesel Biodegradation

Academic Editor: Paul M. Tulkens
Received13 Feb 2017
Revised27 May 2017
Accepted08 Jun 2017
Published10 Sep 2017

Abstract

This work concerns the study of the enhancement of surfactin and fengycin production by B. mojavensis A21 and application of the produced product in diesel biodegradation. The influences of the culture medium and cells immobilization were studied. The highest lipopeptides production was achieved after 72 hours of incubation in a culture medium containing 30 g/L glucose as carbon source and a combination of yeast extract (1 g/L) and glutamic acid (5 g/L) as nitrogen sources with initial pH 7.0 at 30°C and 90% volumetric aeration. The study of primary metabolites production showed mainly the production of acetoin, with a maximum production after 24 h of strain growth. The use of immobilized cells seemed to be a promising method for improving lipopeptides productivity. In fact, the synthesis of both lipopeptides, mainly fengycin, was greatly enhanced by the immobilization of A21 cells. An increase of diesel degradation capacity of approximately 20, 27, and 40% in the presence of 0.5, 1, and 2 g/L of produced lipopeptides, respectively, was observed. Considering these properties, B. mojavensis A21 strain producing a lipopeptide mixture, containing both surfactin and fengycin, may be considered as a potential candidate for future use in bioremediation and crop protection.

1. Introduction

Biosurfactants are produced by many species of yeast, bacteria, and filamentous fungi in the growth media or as part of the cell membrane [1]. They are amphiphilic compounds with hydrophilic and hydrophobic moieties. Biosurfactants have distinct advantages over their chemical equivalents with respect to their low toxicity, biodegradability, biocompatibility, ease of production from renewable resources, and high selectivity and stability at extreme temperature, pH, and salinity [2]. Among biosurfactants, lipopeptides are the most known and mainly produced by Bacillus [3], Pseudomonas [4], Streptomyces [5], and Aspergillus [6]. Structurally, they are composed of a lipid tail linked to a short linear or cyclic oligopeptide. Fengycin, surfactin, and iturin are the main lipopeptides families produced by Bacillus strains. They are made up of seven (surfactins and iturins) or 10 -amino acids (fengycins) linked to one unique β-amino (iturins) or β-hydroxy (surfactins and fengycins) fatty acid. They are produced as mixtures of components varying in their peptidic and/or lipidic structure including homologous and isoform series, which differ in the length and branching of the fatty acid side chains and the amino acid substitutions in the peptide rings, respectively [7]. The application of lipopeptides in cosmetics product was highly increased due to their surface properties and diverse biological activities including antioxidant [8], antiwrinkle, and moisturizing activities on human skin [9]. In addition, they are used in environment and bioremediation applications due to their properties as viscosity reducers, hydrocarbon solubilizing, and metal sequestering candidates for application [10].

Numerous studies concerning free cells production of lipopeptides have been reported. Several parameters such as carbon sources, nitrogen sources, and temperature were studied [11, 12]. In addition, the production of biosurfactants by immobilized cells of Bacillus subtilis was well studied [13, 14].

The study of the structural analyses and biochemical characterization of lipopeptides produced by some B. mojavensis strains was also investigated. The crude lipopeptide mixture, containing surfactin and fengycin isoforms, of Bacillus mojavensis A21 strain was found to be very effective in reducing surface tension [15]. The endophytic bacterium B. mojavensis RRC1001 produced surfactin [16]. Ma et al. [17] reported that the strain B. mojavensis B0621A was found to produce a new iturinic lipopeptide called mojavensin A. However, few studies reported the influence of culture media on lipopeptides production by Bacillus mojavensis strains. In fact, maximum production of lipopeptides by B. mojavensis B0621A was performed at 28°C for 48 h under shaking at 180 rpm in sucrose mineral salt medium [18].

In this study, the effect of medium components, environmental conditions, and cells immobilization on surfactin and fengycin coproduction by B. mojavensis A21 was studied. The ability of A21 lipopeptides to enhance diesel biodegradation by A21 strain was also reported.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strain

B. mojavensis (EU366229) strain A21 used in the present work was isolated in our laboratory from marine water in Sfax City [19].

2.2. Medium Composition and Culture Condition

The studied strain was grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth medium [20]. The medium used for surfactin and fengycin coproduction was composed of (g/L) carbon source (glucose, fructose, sucrose, galactose, or starch), nitrogen source (yeast extract, soya peptone, glutamic acid, aspartic acid, ammonium sulphate, or ammonium nitrate), and salts (K2HPO4, 1 g/L; MgSO4·7H2O, 0.5 g/L; KCl, 0.5 g/L; CuSO4, 1.6 mg/L; Fe2(SO4)3, 1.2 mg/L; and MnSO4, 0.4 mg/L). The strain was cultured in 25 ml of medium in 250 ml conical flasks maintained at 30°C and 160 rpm for 72 h.

2.3. Optimization of Surfactin and Fengycin Coproduction

The effects of different carbon sources (glucose, fructose, sucrose, galactose, and starch) on surfactin and fengycin coproduction by B. mojavensis A21 were examined at a concentration of 2%. The nitrogen source used was yeast extract, 1 g/L, and glutamic acid, 5 g/L. The best carbon source was further optimized in the range of 1 to 6%.

To investigate the effect of nitrogen source on surfactin and fengycin coproduction, the combination of glutamic acid and yeast extract in the basal medium, containing 20 g/L glucose, was replaced with different organic (yeast extract, soya peptone, glutamic acid, and aspartic acid) and inorganic (ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate) compounds at a concentration of 5 g/L. Other combinations (yeast extract, 1 g/L, + glutamic acid, 5 g/L, yeast extract, 1 g/L, + aspartic acid, 5 g/L, and yeast extract, 1 g/L, + glutamic acid, 5 g/L, + ammonium sulphate, 1 g/L) were also tested.

The effect of incubation temperature on surfactin and fengycin coproduction was also investigated at different temperatures (20, 30, and 37°C).

To investigate the effect of pH on lipopeptides production, the initial pH of the medium was adjusted from 5.0 to 9.0. The effect of aeration was also studied by varying the volume of headspace in 250 ml flasks and expressed as volumetric percentage of medium per flask volume (10, 20, and 30%).

2.4. HPLC Analysis of Glucose Organic Acids and Acetoin

Glucose, lactate, acetate, and acetoin concentrations were analyzed in the filtered samples by HPLC using a Fast Fruit Juice column. The elution was performed using phosphoric acid (0.05%) with a flow rate of 0.8 ml/min at 55°C.

2.5. Effect of Cells Immobilization on Surfactin and Fengycin Coproduction

The coproduction of surfactin and fengycin was performed with polypropylene solid carriers coated with Fe2+ support. Production of lipopeptides using immobilized cells occurs in two steps: colonisation experiment and production experiment.

2.5.1. Colonisation of Support

The effect of inoculum size (OD = 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5) and period of the contact with support (48, 96, and 144 h) on biomass yield (cells/g of beads) was studied. The capacity of colonisation was studied using 40 g of beads in 25 ml of modified Landy medium (pH 7 buffered with MOPS 100 mM without glutamic acid) in 250 ml conical flasks at 30°C and agitation at 40 rpm.

For biomass quantification after cells colonisation, beads were removed and sonicated in 4 ml of water during 2 min. Then biomass was estimated as viable cells by plate count method.

2.5.2. Production of Lipopeptides

The cultures were inoculated at OD = 0.5 as initial optical density (600 nm) and after 144 h of colonisation on beads. The beads were gently washed in phosphate buffer and replaced in lipopeptides production medium in 25 ml of medium in 250 ml conical flasks. The culture was agitated at 160 rpm and 30°C during 72 h.

2.6. Quantitative Analysis of Surfactin and Fengycin

High-performance liquid chromatography (C18 column) technique was used for the measurement of surfactin and fengycin concentrations. The surfactin was eluted under acetonitrile (80%), water (20%), and trifluoroacetic acid (0.1%) at 0.6 ml/min. Fengycins were eluted under a gradient acetonitrile/H2O/trifluoroacetic acid from 45/55/0.1 to 55/45/0.1 at 0.6 ml/min. Spectra were analyzed using values of second derivative with a major peak at 212-213 nm associated with a minor peak for surfactin [21] and two major peaks at 213 and 236 nm associated with a minor peak at 290 nm for fengycin [22].

2.7. Surfactin and Fengycin Extraction

The lipopeptides produced by B. mojavensis A21 strain were prepared using ultrafiltration method (10-kDa membrane) and solubilization of the retentate by methanol. Purified lipopeptides were obtained after a second ultrafiltration step and evaporation.

2.8. Effect of A21 Lipopeptides on Diesel Biodegradation

The effect of A21 lipopeptides on diesel biodegradation was tested using three concentrations (0.5, 1, and 2 mg/mL). Cultures were performed in Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 mL of mineral salts medium composed of (g/L) (NH4)2SO4 1, CaCl2 0.01, KH2PO4 0.5, MgSO4 7H2O 0.25, and KCl 0.25 and 2 mL trace element stock solution containing (mg/L) FeSO4 15.2, MnSO4 H2O 1.51, CuSO4 5H2O 0.16, and ZnSO4 7H2O 0.16, supplemented with crude oil (diesel) at a final concentration of 3.0% (v/v). Uninoculated flask served as control. Cultures were incubated at 30°C and 160 rpm for 15 days.

Then whole cultivation broth was centrifuged and the residual crude oil was recovered by hexane (25 mL) extraction. The solvent was allowed to evaporate and the total biodegradation percentage was determined gravimetrically using the expression described by Chaillan et al. [23]. where is the weight of the residual oil in sterile control and is the weight of the fraction in the culture.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Surfactin and Fengycin Coproduction by B. mojavensis A21

Previously Ben Ayed et al. [15] reported the detection and identification of pumilacidin, surfactin, and fengycin isoforms produced by B. mojavensis A21 strain. We first checked the lipopeptide synthesis potential by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using a set of specific degenerated primers. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry has been used as a second method for identification and structural characterization of produced lipopeptides.

Many studies have pointed out different environmental factors for their effect on lipopeptides production [24, 25]. Because carbon source is considered as important parameter for lipopeptides production, B. mojavensis A21 strain was grown in the presence of different carbon source at a concentration of 20 g/l. The microbial growth kinetics and lipopeptides production are represented in Figure 1. The production of both surfactin and fengycin was observed in all used carbon sources. However, the best production was obtained with glucose. However, lipopeptides production was significantly low when the strain was grown on starch.

These results corroborate well with previous studies showing that glucose was the most preferred substrate for lipopeptides production. Addition of glucose resulted in a higher specific production rate of lipopeptides (lipopeptides/cells) by B. subtilis C9, more than the use of sucrose [26]. Glucose has also been mentioned as efficient carbon source for lipopeptides synthesis by B. subtilis SPB1 [11]. In contrast to our results, sucrose was found to be the best carbon source for fengycin production by B. subtilis S499 [25].

Since the production medium was optimized with glucose as sole carbon source, different concentrations of glucose were examined for the best yield of lipopeptides from the studied strain (Figure 2). The obtained results showed an increase in lipopeptides concentration with increasing the initial glucose concentration up to 30 g/L. However, further increase of glucose concentration resulted in decrease of lipopeptides production. Similar results were found by Ghribi and Ellouze-Chaabouni [11], showing that biosurfactants concentration was increased with increasing the initial glucose concentration with a maximum at 40 g/L and then was decreased slightly (96%). This result could be explained by the fact that the produced cells at high glucose concentrations are not physiologically adequate for synthesizing biosurfactants [11].

Another optimizing agent which was utilized for lipopeptides production was nitrogen source that plays role in cellular metabolism thus affecting its production. In the present study, various nitrogen sources were tested. The results obtained (Figure 3) showed that the highest lipopeptides production determined in the culture broth was obtained when a combination of glutamic acid (5 g/L) and yeast extract (1 g/L) was used as nitrogen sources. Moreover, compared to the organic nitrogen sources which support good growth and lipopeptides production, inorganic nitrogen sources like ammonium sulphate and ammonium nitrate are not efficient for lipopeptides production. The results revealed also that no enhancement of lipopeptides production was gained by the replacement of glutamic acid by aspartic acid. These results are in agreement with those previously obtained by Chtioui et al. [13] showing that the Landy medium which contains glutamic acid as nitrogen source promotes the synthesis of lipopeptides by B. subtilis. Other nitrogen sources have been also reported to support lipopeptides production by some Bacillus strains like urea [27] and ammonium nitrate [28].

The effects of temperature, initial pH, and aeration on surfactin and fengycin coproduction by B. mojavensis A21 were studied in optimized medium containing glucose (30 g/L), glutamic acid (5 g/L), and yeast extract (1 g/L).

The pH of medium has been shown to affect many enzymatic processes and transport of compounds across the cell membrane and therefore the production process. In this study, the effect of pH on lipopeptides production was investigated at different pH values (5.0–9.0). As shown in Figure 4, the production levels of surfactins and fengycins were increased by a factor of 3.7 and 2.13, respectively, when increasing the pH value from 5.0 to 7.0. Earlier studies revealed that neutral initial pH favoured lipopeptides production by Bacillus strains [14, 29, 30].

To study the effect of temperature on lipopeptides production, the strain was grown at different temperatures (20, 30, and 37°C) for 72 h. The results revealed that optimum level of surfactin (127.14 mg/L) was achieved at 20°C. However, the best fengycin production was obtained at 30°C (Table 1). However, higher temperature (37°C) unfavoured lipopeptides synthesis by A21 strain. Numerous studies have pointed out the effect of temperature on lipopeptides production. For example, higher temperature (37°C) favoured surfactin synthesis of B. subtilis RB14 isolated from compost [31] but not that of Bacillus subtilis S499 [25]. In other hand, a 30-fold increase in mycosubtilin production was observed when the temperature decreased from 37 to 25°C; this was observed for both strain B. subtilis ATCC6633 and its derivative BBG100, which is a constitutive overproducer [32].


Temperature (°C)203037

OD6006.687.077.57
Surfactin (mg/L)127.1491.9642.7
Fengycin (mg/L)186.1247.396.14

The strain was cultured in 25 ml of medium in 250 ml conical flasks maintained at different temperatures (20, 30, and 37°C) and 160 rpm for 72 h.

The effect of aeration on lipopeptides production was tested in 250 ml flasks at different relative filling volume. The highest production of surfactin and fengycin was observed in 250 ml flasks with 25 ml of culture medium. A sharp decline in this production occurred upon decreasing of aeration upon 70% (250 ml flasks with 75 ml of culture medium) (Figure 5). In contrast, there are no significant differences between fengycin production observed in the three different relative filling volumes. These results are in agreement with those previously obtained by Jacques et al. [25] showing that B. subtilis S499 produce more surfactin in better aeration condition. In the same context, Chollet-Imbert et al. [22] showed that B. subtilis ATCC9943 produced more fengycin when oxygen was limited.

3.2. HPLC Analysis of Glucose and Primary Metabolites Production

Bacillus strains are known to produce acetoin and 2,3-butanediol, which have been proved to elicit induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants [33]. In this study, glucose consumption and the consequent production of metabolites like lactate, acetate, acetoin, and butanediol were studied (Figure 6).

Lactate production reached 2.83 g/L after 24 h of culture. In addition, acetoin production reached its maximum level after 24 h of growth (7.5 g/L) and then showed a slight decrease and completely converted after 48 h. Similar patterns were observed for the production of these metabolites by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens OG [34]. The primary metabolite production has been demonstrated previously with other strains of Bacillus using glucose as the main source of carbon and limited oxygen [35, 36]. Acetoin production is stimulated by pyruvate when glucose is present as an energy source and contributes to maintaining internal pH of cell [37]. Analysis of organic acids production shows also a slight lactate production that reaches its highest point at the end of exponential phase and is then used after glucose has been depleted. It has been proposed that a large percentage of glucose added to the culture was converted to acetate during vegetative growth [38].

However, the lack of 2,3-butanediol seems as an unexpected result. It has been shown that the acetoin utilization occurs after acetate depletion and then its reduction generated 2,3-butanediol which plays an important role in the cell.

The coproduction of lipopeptides and acetoin improved the use of A21 extract which can be used in crop protection. In addition, acetoin (3-hydroxybutan-2-one) is widely used in food, cigarettes, flavour, cosmetics, detergents, and chemical synthesis [39]. The absence of 2,3-butanediol facilitates the recovery of acetoin, which can be easily performed using an acetone/phosphate aqueous two-phase system [40].

3.3. Surfactin and Fengycin Coproduction by Immobilized Cells of B. mojavensis A21

Immobilization of cells was proved to be an efficient method to improve lipopeptides production [13, 14]. Lipopeptides production by immobilized cells occurs in two steps: colonisation step and production step.

The maximal biomass (108/g of support) was obtained after 144 h of contact with support and with initial OD of 0.5 (Table 2). The production of lipopeptides was performed using support under these conditions (Figure 7). In fact, the beads were replaced in lipopeptides production medium and incubated at 30°C during 72 h. As reported in Figure 7, the immobilized cells improve highly the fengycin and surfactin coproduction, especially at the beginning of fermentation process, while the concentrations are relatively low. In fact, after 24 h, biofilm cultures produced more lipopeptides than planktonic cells. This effect still exists at 48 h and 72 h in the case of fengycin. The effect of addition of polypropylene solid carriers coated with Fe2+ was more important on fengycin concentrations; the fengycin production increases up to 2 times after the immobilization. These results are in agreement with those previously obtained by Gancel et al. [14] showing that immobilized cells of B. subtilis BBG21 produce more lipopeptides than planktonic cells.


InoculationOD = 0.1OD = 0.3OD = 0.5

48 h15,10629,10648,106
96 h38,10670,10695,106
144 h44,10678,106100,106

Polypropylene solid carriers coated with Fe2+ support in Landy base medium at pH 7 buffered with MOPS 100 mM without glutamic acid.

However, the production of both surfactin and fengycin was decreased after 72 h of cultivation. This result was similar to result found by Leclère et al. [41]. In fact, the biofilm surface becomes more hydrophobic, which causes lipopeptide production decrease.

3.4. Application of A21 Lipopeptides in Diesel Biodegradation

Surface-active compounds, like lipopeptides, can improve the solubility and removal of hydrophobic soil contaminants and, consequently, their biodegradation. In this study A21 strain was tested for its ability to degrade and utilize diesel fuel as the sole carbon and energy source in the presence of different concentrations of lipopeptides (0.5, 1, and 2 g/L). Control medium without lipopeptides addition was used. Cultures were performed in diesel oil (3%) based medium at 30°C for 15 days. Different samples were taken at regular intervals and diesel degradation percentage and viable cells were determined.

As reported in Figure 8, the strain was able to grow in the presence of diesel and without A21 lipopeptides (control medium). The biomass of B. mojavensis A21 increased exponentially with the increase in incubation time up to 8 days and declined thereafter.

The biodegradation percentage reached 15% after six days and thereafter increased till a maximum value (about 58%) after 15 days of incubation.

The addition of A21 lipopeptides at different concentrations to the diesel based medium showed an increase of diesel degradation capacity with the increase of lipopeptides concentration. In fact, compared with the lipopeptides-free inoculated culture, a significant increase of the biodegradation efficiency of diesel oil by the A21 strain, of approximately 20, 27, and 40% in the presence of 0.5, 1, and 2 g/L of lipopeptides, respectively, was observed.

The improvement of diesel biodegradation by lipopeptides addition was described previously [42, 43]. The mechanism proposed for improving degradability of hydrophobic organic compounds includes the ability of biosurfactants to enhance the bioavailability of the hydrocarbon through pseudosolubilization, which effectively reduces the interfacial tension between this compound and bacterial cell surfaces and probably facilitates the take-up of this substrate by the organism.

4. Conclusion

The nature of culture conditions and composition of media for optimal production of lipopeptides by B. mojavensis A21 have been developed in this study. Glucose and glutamic acid showed significant effect on lipopeptides production. The optimum initial pH of medium and incubation temperature for maximum production were found to be 7.0 and 30°C. The immobilization of B. mojavensis A21 on supports of low density allows a higher production of both surfactin and fengycin and could improve mainly fengycin production.

The study of primary metabolites production showed interestingly the production of acetoin, a well-known molecule implicated in plant defense. The addition of lipopeptides at different concentrations to the diesel based medium increased diesel degradation by A21 strain.

In conclusion, surfactin and fengycin were coproduced with acetoin, which gives more added value to the produced extract of B. mojavensis A21.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research, Tunisia.

References

  1. S.-Y. Chen, Y.-H. Wei, and J.-S. Chang, “Repeated pH-stat fed-batch fermentation for rhamnolipid production with indigenous Pseudomonas aeruginosa S2,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. R. Thavasi, V. R. M. S. Nambaru, S. Jayalakshmi, T. Balasubramanian, and I. M. Banat, “Biosurfactant production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa from renewable resources,” Indian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. Peypoux, J. M. Bonmatin, and J. Wallach, “Recent trends in the biochemistry of surfactin,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 553–563, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. I. Grgurina, “Lipopeptide secondary metabolites from the phytopathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae,” in Advances in microbial toxin research and its biotechnological exploitation, R. Upadhyay, Ed., 140, p. 105, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  5. R. H. Baltz, V. Miao, and S. K. Wrigley, “Natural products to drugs: daptomycin and related lipopeptide antibiotics,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 717–741, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. Hino, A. Fujie, T. Iwamoto et al., “Chemical diversity in lipopeptide antifungal antibiotics,” Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 157–162, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Ongena and P. Jacques, “Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 115–125, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Ben Ayed, S. Bardaa, D. Moalla et al., “Wound healing and in vitro antioxidant activities of lipopeptides mixture produced by Bacillus mojavensis A21,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 1023–1030, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Kanlayavattanakul and N. Lourith, “Lipopeptides in cosmetics,” International Journal of Cosmetic Science, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. I. Mnif and D. Ghribi, “Lipopeptides biosurfactants: Mean classes and new insights for industrial, biomedical, and environmental applications,” Biopolymers, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 129–147, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Ghribi and S. Ellouze-Chaabouni, “Enhancement of Bacillus subtilis lipopeptide biosurfactants production through optimization of medium composition and adequate control of aeration,” Biotechnology Research International, vol. 2011, Article ID 653654, 6 pages, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. Willenbacher, W. Yeremchuk, T. Mohr, C. Syldatk, and R. Hausmann, “Enhancement of Surfactin yield by improving the medium composition and fermentation process,” AMB Express, vol. 5, no. 1, article 57, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. O. Chtioui, K. Dimitrov, F. Gancel, and I. Nikov, “Biosurfactants production by immobilized cells of Bacillus subtilis ATCC 21332 and their recovery by pertraction,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 45, no. 11, pp. 1795–1799, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. F. Gancel, L. Montastruc, T. Liu, L. Zhao, and I. Nikov, “Lipopeptide overproduction by cell immobilization on iron-enriched light polymer particles,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 975–978, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. H. Ben Ayed, N. Hmidet, M. Béchet et al., “Identification and biochemical characteristics of lipopeptides from Bacillus mojavensis A21,” Process Biochemistry, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1699–1707, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. E. Snook, T. Mitchell, D. M. Hinton, and C. W. Bacon, “Isolation and characterization of Leu 7-surfactin from the endophytic bacterium bacillus mojavensis RRC 101, a biocontrol agent for fusarium Verticillioides,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 4287–4292, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. Z. Ma, N. Wang, J. Hu, and S. Wang, “Isolation and characterization of a new iturinic lipopeptide, mojavensin A produced by a marine-derived bacterium Bacillus mojavensis B0621A,” Journal of Antibiotics, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 317–322, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Z. Ma and J. Hu, “Production and characterization of iturinic lipopeptides as antifungal agents and biosurfactants produced by a marine Pinctada martensii-derived Bacillus mojavensis B0621A,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 173, no. 3, pp. 705–715, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. A. Haddar, R. Agrebi, A. Bougatef, N. Hmidet, A. Sellami-Kamoun, and M. Nasri, “Two detergent stable alkaline serine-proteases from Bacillus mojavensis A21: purification, characterization and potential application as a laundry detergent additive,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 100, no. 13, pp. 3366–3373, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. H. Miller, Experiments in molecular genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 1972.
  21. T. Liu, L. Montastruc, F. Gancel, L. Zhao, and I. Nikov, “Integrated process for production of surfactin. Part 1: Adsorption rate of pure surfactin onto activated carbon,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 333–340, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Chollet-Imbert, F. Gancel, C. Slomianny, and P. Jacques, “Differentiated pellicle organization and lipopeptide production in standing culture of Bacillus subtilis strains,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 63–71, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. F. Chaillan, A. Le Flèche, E. Bury et al., “Identification and biodegradation potential of tropical aerobic hydrocarbon-degrading microorganisms,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 7, pp. 587–595, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. E. H. Duitman, L. W. Hamoen, M. Rembold et al., “The mycosubtilin synthetase of Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633: A multifunctional hybrid between a peptide synthetase, an amino transferase, and a fatty acid synthase,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 23, pp. 13294–13299, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. Jacques, C. Hbid, J. Destain et al., “Optimization of biosurfactant lipopeptide production from Bacillus subtilis S499 Plackett-Burman design,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology - Part A Enzyme Engineering and Biotechnology, vol. 77-79, pp. 223–233, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  26. H.-S. Kim, B.-D. Yoon, C.-H. Lee et al., “Production and properties of a lipopeptide biosurfactant from Bacillus subtilis C9,” Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Zhang, Q. Xue, H. Gao, H. Lai, and P. Wang, “Production of lipopeptide biosurfactants by Bacillus atrophaeus 5-2a and their potential use in microbial enhanced oil recovery,” Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 15, no. 1, article 168, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. S. Guez, C. H. Müller, P. M. Danze, J. Büchs, and P. Jacques, “Respiration activity monitoring system (RAMOS), an efficient tool to study the influence of the oxygen transfer rate on the synthesis of lipopeptide by Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 134, no. 1-2, pp. 121–126, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. A. M. Abdel-Mawgoud, M. M. Aboulwafa, and N. A.-H. Hassouna, “Characterization of surfactin produced by Bacillus subtilis isolates BS5,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 150, no. 3, pp. 289–303, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. H. M. Abushady, A. S. Bashandy, N. H. Aziz, and J. M. M. Ibrahim, “Molecular characterization of Bacillus subtilis surfactin producing strain and the factors affecting its production,” Int J Agricult Biol, vol. 7, pp. 337–344, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  31. A. Ohno, T. Ano, and M. Shoda, “Production of a lipopeptide antibiotic, surfactin, by recombinant Bacillus subtilis in solid state fermentation,” Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 209–214, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. P. Fickers, V. Leclère, J.-S. Guez et al., “Temperature dependence of mycosubtilin homologue production in Bacillus subtilis ATCC6633,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 449–457, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. T. Rudrappa, M. L. Biedrzycki, S. G. Kunjeti et al., “The rhizobacterial elicitor acetoin induces systemic resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana,” Communicative and Integrative Biology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 130–138, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Etchegaray, F. Coutte, G. Chataigné et al., “Production of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens OG and its metabolites in renewable media: valorisation for biodiesel production and p-xylene decontamination,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 46–60, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. F. Coutte, D. Lecouturier, S. A. Yahia et al., “Production of surfactin and fengycin by Bacillus subtilis in a bubbleless membrane bioreactor,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 499–507, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. M. Nakano, Y. P. Dailly, P. Zuber, and D. P. Clark, “Characterization of anaerobic fermentative growth of Bacillus subtilis: Identification of fermentation end products and genes required for growth,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 21, pp. 6749–6755, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J.-L. Tsau, A. A. Guffanti, and T. J. Montville, “Conversion of pyruvate to acetoin helps to maintain pH homeostasis in Lactobacillus plantarum,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 891–894, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  38. T. M. Henkin and G. H. Chambliss, “Genetic mapping of a mutation causing an alteration in Bacillus subtilis ribosomal protein S4,” MGG Molecular & General Genetics, vol. 193, no. 2, pp. 364–369, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. Z. Xiao and J. R. Lu, “Strategies for enhancing fermentative production of acetoin: A review,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 492–503, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Sun, B. Rao, L. Zhang, Y. Shen, and D. Wei, “Extraction of acetoin from fermentation broth using an acetone/phosphate aqueous two-phase system,” Chemical Engineering Communications, vol. 199, no. 11, pp. 1492–1503, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. V. Leclère, R. Marti, M. Béchet, P. Fickers, and P. Jacques, “The lipopeptides mycosubtilin and surfactin enhance spreading of Bacillus subtilis strains by their surface-active properties,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 186, no. 6, pp. 475–483, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. H. Ben Ayed, N. Jemil, H. Maalej, A. Bayoudh, N. Hmidet, and M. Nasri, “Enhancement of solubilization and biodegradation of diesel oil by biosurfactant from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens An6,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 99, pp. 8–14, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. I. Mnif, S. Mnif, R. Sahnoun et al., “Biodegradation of diesel oil by a novel microbial consortium: comparison between co-inoculation with biosurfactant-producing strain and exogenously added biosurfactants,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 14852–14861, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Noomen Hmidet et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1852 Views | 689 Downloads | 5 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.