Dexmedetomidine Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide Induced MCP-1 Expression in Primary Astrocyte

Liu, Huan; Davis, Jacques R. J.; Wu, Zhi-Lin; Faez Abdelgawad, Amro

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6352159

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 6352159 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6352159

Dexmedetomidine Attenuates Lipopolysaccharide Induced MCP-1 Expression in Primary Astrocyte

Huan Liu,¹Jacques R. J. Davis,¹Zhi-Lin Wu,¹and Amro Faez Abdelgawad²

Academic Editor: Maja Surbatovic

Received20 Jun 2016

Revised29 Nov 2016

Accepted11 Jan 2017

Published14 Feb 2017

Abstract

Background. Neuroinflammation which presents as a possible mechanism of delirium is associated with MCP-1, an important proinflammatory factor which is expressed on astrocytes. It is known that dexmedetomidine (DEX) possesses potent anti-inflammatory properties. This study aimed to investigate the potential effects of DEX on the production of MCP-1 in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated astrocytes. Materials and Methods. Astrocytes were treated with LPS (10 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 1000 ng/ml), DEX (500 ng/mL), LPS (100 ng/ml), and DEX (10, 100, and 500 ng/mL) for a duration of three hours; expression levels of MCP-1 were measured by real-time PCR. The double immunofluorescence staining protocol was utilized to determine the expression of α2-adrenoceptors (α2AR) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) on astrocytes. Results. Expressions of MCP-1 mRNA in astrocytes were induced dose-dependently by LPS. Administration of DEX significantly inhibited the expression of MCP-1 mRNA (). Double immunofluorescence assay showed that α2AR colocalize with GFAP, which indicates the expression of α2-adrenoceptors in astrocytes. Conclusions. DEX is a potent suppressor of MCP-1 in astrocytes induced with lipopolysaccharide through α₂A-adrenergic receptors, which potentially explains its beneficial effects in the treatment of delirium by attenuating neuroinflammation.

1. Introduction

Delirium is the most common psychiatric syndrome for senior ICU patients [1], often resulting in higher mortality rates and increased duration of hospital stay [2, 3]. Its mechanism has not been completely understood yet. A line of studies indicated that neuroinflammation may play a role in its pathogenesis [4–6]. Astrocytes, the main component of glial cells in central nervous system, function not only as the basic structure skeleton, but also as a key participant in the activity of the central nervous system [7]. Immunologically they maintain a dormant state until aroused by the stimulation of pain, ischemia, or other injuries. The astrocytes will then be activated, resulting in large numbers of proinflammatory factors, leading to cytokine synthesis and resulting in neuroinflammation [8].

Of all the cytokines secreted by astrocytes, MCP-1 is the one that has been elucidated clearly. It is a potent chemotoxin and activation factor for monocytes, which can modulate the synthesis of cytokines and adhesion molecules on the cell surface, thus being an important proinflammation factor [9]. Studies showed that MCP-1 plays a pivotal role for monocyte recruitment in spinal trauma and nerve inflammation [10, 11]. Inhibiting MCP-1 secretion can dramatically attenuate the inflammation response [12]. Therefore inhibiting the expression of MCP-1 in astrocytes may provide a potential method for the treatment of nerve inflammation and delirium.

DEX is a highly selective α2AR agonist. A number of studies showed that it possesses anti-inflammatory capabilities [13–15]. It was found to reduce the systematic inflammatory responses in rats with endotoxemia, regulate inflammatory responses of macrophages induced by LPS [16, 17], alleviate myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury, and reduce infarction size [18]. In the central nervous system, DEX is proven to promote neurotrophic-factor secretion in astrocytes and exerts a neuroprotective effect [19]. DEX is also a potent suppressor of lipopolysaccharide induced inflammation in activated microglial cells [20]. However, little is known regarding the effects of DEX on the inflammation of astrocytes. The following research aims to investigate the effects of DEX on the production of MCP-1 in LPS activated astrocytes and provide useful and applicable information to reveal the potential therapeutic value of DEX in the treatment of delirium in ICU patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Primary Cortical Astrocyte Culture Preparation

Primary cortical astrocytes were obtained from 1-day-old neonatal Sprague-Dawley rats. The detailed protocol was previously described [21]. Briefly, the cerebral cortices of the rats were minced with a mesh bag (100 mm). Dissociated cortical cells were then suspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and plated on 25 cm² flasks at a density of 600,000 cells/cm². Monolayers of type 1 astrocytes were obtained 6–8 days after plating. The confluent cultures were shaken at (200 rpm, 37) for 4 hours to separate the remaining microglial cells and oligodendroglial cells. The purity of primary cortical astrocytes was assessed by immunofluorescent staining for GFAP (Sigma, USA). Once established that more than 95% of the cultured cells were GFAP positive, d-cAMP (150 μmlo/L) was added to induce cell maturation over a duration of 3 to 4 days.

2.2. Immunofluorescence Assay

Primary astrocytes were prepared from the cerebral cortex of neonatal rats as described above. Astrocytes were then cultured on cover glasses (18 mm 18 mm) placed in the 6-well plates. Dibutyryl cAMP (d-cAMP, 0.15 mM, Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to induce differentiation when cells attained 50%–80% confluence. Then serum-containing medium was abandoned and cover glasses were washed one time with 0.01 M PBS. The astrocytes were then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 minutes. The slides were initially blocked with 5% goat-serum for 2 hours at room temperature and then incubated with the following two primary antibodies: α2A (rabbit, 1 : 50, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA) and GAPDH (mouse, 1 : 20,000, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) at 4°C overnight. After washing them with PBS three times, the slides were then incubated free from light with Cy3- or FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1 : 1000, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA, USA) for 2 hours at room temperature, rinsing well and sealing the slides with 30 μl mounting medium. The stained sections were examined with a Leica fluorescence microscope, and images were captured with a CCD Spot camera. Some sections with double staining of α2A and GFAP were imaged with Leica SP8 Gated STED confocal microscope.

2.3. Experiment Protocols

In the preliminary experiment, we aimed to achieve the optimum dose of LPS for astrocyte, so cells (approximately 1,105 cells/mL) were seeded in six-well plates before being subjected to treatments. Five groups of astrocytes were subjected to various treatments. In group 1, cells were incubated in OPT for 3 hours as a control. In groups 2–5, cells were treated with 10 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 1000 ng/ml LPS; real-time PCR was used to measure MCP-1 mRNA expression. We established that astrocytes were most sensitive to 100 ng/ml LPS. Thus we utilized the optimum dose of 100 ng/ml for the following experiments. Another six groups of cells were subjected to various treatments. In group 1 cells were incubated in OPT for 3 hours as a control. In group 2, cells were treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 3 hours; in group 3, cells were treated with 500 ng/ml DEX for 3 hours. In groups 4-5, cells were pretreated with 10 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 500 ng/ml DEX for 1/2-hour and then with 100 ng/ml LPS for 3 hours.

2.4. Reverse Transcription and Polymerase Chain Reaction

Total RNA were prepared from astrocytes by utilizing the Trizol reagent (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Total RNA was reversely transcribed by using Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers were as follows: MCP-1, sense: 5′-ACTTGACCCATAAATCTGA-3′, antisense: 5′-TGGAAGGGAALAGTGTAAT-3′; GAPDH: sense: 5′-TCC TAC CCC CAA TGT ATC CG-3′, antisense: 5′-CCT TTA GTGGGC CCT CGG-3. The following PCR condition was applied: denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, then 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, annealing at 56～60°C for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 30 s. The PCR products were photographed after electrophoresis through agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and analyzed with Rotor-Gene Corbett software.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All results observed were expressed as the means ± standard error of the mean. Intragroup comparisons were made by one way ANOVA. Binary comparisons were made by Student’s -test. A value of < 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. LPS Stimulated MCP-1 Releasing in Astrocyte

Before harvesting, morphology examined under microscope showed astrocyte adhesion on the wall, with cell body contracting, multiple cytoprocesses, and no floating. After 3 hours of coculture with LPS 10 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 1000 ng/ml, expressions of MCP-1 mRNA were measured. There was no observable difference on MCP-1 between the group containing 10 ng/ml and the group containing 50 ng/ml.

Consequently the expression of MCP-1 mRNA increased dose-dependently with LPS (Figure 1). Since astrocytes were most sensitive to a dose of 100 ng/ml LPS, this concentration of LPS was utilized in the following study.

3.2. DEX Suppresses MCP-1 Release in LPS-Stimulated Astrocytes

Expression of MCP-1 mRNA increased 37-fold in astrocytes that were being stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS in comparison to the control group, while, in groups pretreated with DEX (10 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 500 ng/ml) for 30 min, MCP-1 mRNA expression decreased dramatically under the identical stimulation of LPS.

To exclude the possible toxic effects of high concentration DEX, maturely differentiated astrocytes were pretreated with 500 ng/ml DEX alone for 3 hours. The expression of MCP-1 mRNA was then observed to remain the same as the control group. This suggested that DEX possessed no poisonous effect on astrocytes (Figure 2).

3.3. DEX Suppresses the MCP-1 Releasing through α2AR

Double immunofluorescence displayed that α2AR colocalize with GFAP, which evidently proved the existence of α2AR in astrocytes (Figure 3). As a specific agonist of α2AR, DEX might potentially suppress the release of MCP-1 through this pathway.

4. Discussion

This is the first study to demonstrate that DEX was capable of attenuating the expression of MCP-1 mRNA, a potent proinflammatory factor in primary cultured astrocytes activated by LPS. This provides additional evidence for DEX’s therapeutic value in neuroinflammation and related illnesses such as delirium.

Astrocytes are the chief components of glial cells in the central nervous system and maintain a key role in the process of neuroprotection against various kinds of injuries [22, 23]. They specially buffer ions like K⁺, scavenge free radicals for the maintenance of the extracellular environment, provide substrates for neurotransmitters and antioxidants, secrete neurotrophic factors, promote much needed neovascularization, and assist in the regeneration of synapses and neurons [24–28]. Astrocytes can be activated by inflammatory mediators in a wide range of CNS pathologies, including ischemia, infection, and neurotrauma [29–31]. Through the release of numerous proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, astrocytes are thereby involved in the process of immune response initiation and regulation [32]. Astrocytes activation is thought to be protective via destruction of pathogens, removal of debris, and promotion of tissue repair [33]. However, prolonged and sustained inflammation may have cytotoxic effects, aggravating the incidence and the severity of the disease. Symptoms such as fever, somnolence, hyperalgia, and allodynia are all related to the neuroinflammation process [34].

Of the chemokines, which astrocytes released, MCP-1 is the one that has been clarified quite clearly. It is produced by monocytes, fibroblast cells, B cells, and endothelium and glial cells. In the central nervous system, the astrocytes are the main source [35]. It chemoattracts and activates monocytes, modulates cytokines and adhesion molecule production, and initiates inflammatory responses [36]. MCP-1 receptors on the surface of astrocytes modulate the production with regard to a positive feedback mechanism. MCP-1 could possibly be involved in secondary inflammatory response in the site of spinal injury [37]. It has been observed to cause neuronal death via direct apoptotic mechanisms through specific cell surface chemokine receptors [38]. MCP-1 receptor antagonists dramatically controlled the inflammation response and enhanced neurological recovery in rats with spinal-cord contusion injuries [10]. With administration of MCP-1-antibody, cases of neuropathologic pain in sciatic and L5 spinal nerve ligation models can be significantly alleviated [12].

Nonselective alpha adrenergic receptor agonists such as noradrenaline can reduce the production of MCP-1 in rat-cultured astrocytes in the presence of an inflammatory stimulus [39], such as LPS. The effect was reversed by alpha-2 adrenergic receptor antagonist Yohimbine which indicates alpha-2 adrenergic receptors are important cell signaling pathways for modulating the release of inflammatory cytokines [40].

DEX, an alpha-2 agonist, is a widely used sedative in intensive care units. Numerous studies revealed that, other than its sedation effect, DEX possesses potent anti-inflammation capabilities as well as being greatly beneficial as a neuroprotective agent [41]. The aim of this research was to investigate the effect of DEX on the production of MCP-1 in primary cultured astrocytes activated by LPS. LPS is a potent stimulus which induces a process of an inflammation response in endotoxemia. Firstly we studied the most optimum dose of LPS for stimulating the release of MCP-1 in astrocyte. We used 50 ng/ml, 100 ng/ml, and 1000 ng/ml LPS in this case for the stimulation of astrocytes and found that, with a dose of 100 ng/ml LPS, stimulation of astrocytes displayed the most sensitive reaction in regard to the release of MCP-1. After establishing the correct and most applicable dose of LPS, we pretreated astrocytes with 10 ng/ml, 50 ng/ml, and 500 ng/ml dexmedetomidine and then with 100 ng/ml LPS stimulation. All groups showed that there was a decrease in the rate of synthesis of MCP-1 RNA. To exclude the toxic effects of DEX regarding astrocytes, astrocytes were treated with a high dose of DEX alone. Results indicated that there was no observable difference compared to the control group. This suggested that DEX possesses no toxic effect on astrocytes.

DEX’s capability of organ protection has been confirmed by numerous studies. DEX inhibits cell apoptosis and death and increases the survival rate of neurons by modulating the release of catecholamine and glutamate in the central nervous system [42]. Research indicated that DEX can increase survival rate of rats diseased by septic shock in manner of decreasing systematic inflammation [16]. DEX suppresses the release of cytokines IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 and promotes the recovery of spinal injury in rats [15]. Besides its anti-inflammation capability, DEX promotes the release of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factors in rat astrocytes, for neuronal and synapse regeneration [43]. DEX has no direct cytoprotective effect on H₂O₂ exposed neurons; however clinically relevant concentrations of DEX are neuroprotective against oxidative damage due to the stimulation of astrocytic-adrenoceptors, causing release of HB-EGF which in turn activates neuronal EGF receptors [44].

However, it still remains unclear whether DEX has a direct effect on anti-inflammation of astrocytes or not. In our research, primary cultured astrocytes were pretreated with different doses of DEX and then stimulated with 100 ng/ml LPS; real-time PCR indicated that the following concentrations: 10, 100, and 500 ng/ml DEX, dramatically inhibited the release of MCP-1 mRNA. Thus, these results indicate that DEX possesses the capability of inhibiting the production of MCP-1 on astrocytes.

There are however some limits within our study. Firstly, the clinical therapeutic plasma concentration of DEX is 0.3–2 ng/ml; research suggests that 1 ng/ml DEX has no observable effect on the microglial cell inflammatory response. Our research suggested that 10 ng/ml DEX inhibits the release of MCP-1. Whether a lower dose of DEX could possess the same effect still remains to be known. High concentrations of DEX can increase free cytosolic calcium concentration in astrocytes. The effect is partly blocked by Yohimbine and by Idazoxan, an inhibitor at the imidazoline-preference site [45]. The molecular signaling pathway of DEX regarding the production of MCP-1 in LPS-stimulated astrocytes is yet to be investigated.

In summary, this study indicates that DEX possesses the potential to decrease inflammatory response by inhibiting MCP-1 expression through α2AR on astrocytes and in addition exerts a protective effect on neuroinflammation. This research provides applicable data and results which indicate the potential value of DEX in the treatment of delirium in ICU patients.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

References

M. C. Marshall and M. D. Soucy, “Delirium in the intensive care unit,” Critical Care Nursing Quarterly, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 172–178, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. W. Ely, A. Shintani, B. Truman et al., “Delirium as a predictor of mortality in mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 291, no. 14, pp. 1753–1762, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Rockwood, S. Cosway, D. Carver, P. Jarrett, K. Stadnyk, and J. Fisk, “The risk of dementia and death after delirium,” Age and Ageing, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 551–556, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. C. Van Munster, E. Aronica, A. H. Zwinderman, P. Eikelenboom, C. Cunningham, and S. E. J. A. De Rooij, “Neuroinflammation in delirium: a postmortem case-control study,” Rejuvenation Research, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 615–622, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Cerejeira, H. Firmino, A. Vaz-Serra, and E. B. Mukaetova-Ladinska, “The neuroinflammatory hypothesis of delirium,” Acta Neuropathologica, vol. 119, no. 6, pp. 737–754, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. D. Ghnassia and G. Debray, “The indications and limitation of ketamine anesthsia in plastic surgery,” Annales de chirurgie plastique, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 58–60, 1972.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Volterra and J. Meldolesi, “Astrocytes, from brain glue to communication elements: the revolution continues,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 626–640, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Giaume, A. Koulakoff, L. Roux, D. Holcman, and N. Rouach, “Astroglial networks: a step further in neuroglial and gliovascular interactions,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 87–99, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bajetto, R. Bonavia, S. Barbero, T. Florio, and G. Schettini, “Chemokines and their receptors in the central nervous system,” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 147–184, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ma, T. Wei, L. Boring, I. F. Charo, R. M. Ransohoff, and L. B. Jakeman, “Monocyte recruitment and myelin removal are delayed following spinal cord injury in mice with CCR2 chemokine receptor deletion,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 691–702, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Samama, A. Guyon, S. Millez, S. Myriam Dridi, and F. Gaultier, “Abcès migrateur de Chompret-L'Hirondel abscess,” La Revue du praticien, vol. 64, no. 8, p. 1047, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
R. S. Ghirnikar, Y. L. Lee, and L. F. Eng, “Chemokine antagonist infusion promotes axonal sparing after spinal cord contusion injury in rat,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 582–589, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Tasdogan, D. Memis, N. Sut, and M. Yuksel, “Results of a pilot study on the effects of propofol and dexmedetomidine on inflammatory responses and intraabdominal pressure in severe sepsis,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 394–400, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Taniguchi, A. Kurita, K. Kobayashi, K. Yamamoto, and H. Inaba, “Dose- and time-related effects of dexmedetomidine on mortality and inflammatory responses to endotoxin-induced shock in rats,” Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 221–228, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Can, S. Gul, S. Bektas, V. Hanci, and S. Acikgoz, “Effects of dexmedetomidine or methylprednisolone on inflammatory responses in spinal cord injury,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 1068–1072, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Taniguchi, Y. Kidani, H. Kanakura, Y. Takemoto, and K. Yamamoto, “Effects of dexmedetomidine on mortality rate and inflammatory responses to endotoxin-induced shock in rats,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1322–1326, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-C. Lai, P.-S. Tsai, and C.-J. Huang, “Effects of dexmedetomidine on regulating endotoxin-induced up-regulation of inflammatory molecules in murine macrophages,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 154, no. 2, pp. 212–219, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Okada, T. Kurita, T. Mochizuki, K. Morita, and S. Sato, “The cardioprotective effect of dexmedetomidine on global ischaemia in isolated rat hearts,” Resuscitation, vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 538–545, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Li, T. Du, H. Li et al., “Signalling pathways for transactivation by dexmedetomidine of epidermal growth factor receptors in astrocytes and its paracrine effect on neurons,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 191–203, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Peng, Y.-L. Wang, C.-Y. Wang, and C. Chen, “Dexmedetomidine attenuates lipopolysaccharide-induced proinflammatory response in primary microglia,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. E219–E225, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Arai and E. H. Lo, “Astrocytes protect oligodendrocyte precursor cells via MEK/ERK and PI3K/Akt signaling,” Journal of Neuroscience Research, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 758–763, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Trendelenburg and U. Dirnagl, “Neuroprotective role of astrocytes in cerebral ischemia: focus on ischemic preconditioning,” GLIA, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 307–320, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Panickar and M. D. Noremberg, “Astrocytes in cerebral ischemic injury: morphological and general considerations,” GLIA, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 287–298, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Hertz, E. Hansson, and L. Rönnbäck, “Signaling and gene expression in the neuron-glia unit during brain function and dysfunction: Holger Hydén in memoriam,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 227–252, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Håberg, H. Qu, O. Sæther, G. Unsgård, O. Haraldseth, and U. Sonnewald, “Differences in neurotransmitter synthesis and intermediary metabolism between glutamatergic and GABAergic neurons during 4 hours of middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat: the role of astrocytes in neuronal survival,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1451–1463, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
E. M. Blanc, A. J. Bruce-Keller, and M. P. Mattson, “Astrocytic gap junctional communication decreases neuronal vulnerability to oxidative stress-induced disruption of Ca²⁺ homeostasis and cell death,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 958–970, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Song, C. F. Stevens, and F. H. Gage, “Astroglia induce neurogenesis from adult neural stem cells,” Nature, vol. 417, no. 6884, pp. 39–44, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Lim and A. Alvarez-Buylla, “Interaction between astrocytes and adult subventricular zone precursors stimulates neurogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 13, pp. 7526–7531, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Bernaudin, A. Bellail, H. H. Marti et al., “Neurons and astrocytes express EPO mRNa: oxygen-sensing mechanisms that involve the redox-state of the brain,” Glia, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 271–278, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Badaut, L. Hirt, C. Granziera, J. Bogousslavsky, P. J. Magistretti, and L. Regli, “Astrocyte-specific expression of aquaporin-9 in mouse brain is increased after transient focal cerebral ischemia,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 477–482, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Liu and T. Kielian, “MyD88 is pivotal for immune recognition of Citrobacter koseri and astrocyte activation during CNS infection,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 8, article 35, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. M. Dhandapani, M. Hadman, L. De Sevilla, M. F. Wade, V. B. Mahesh, and D. W. Brann, “Astrocyte Protection of Neurons: role of transforming growth factor-β signaling via a c-Jun-AP-1 protective pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 44, pp. 43329–43339, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nakayama, T. Momoki-Soga, and N. Inoue, “Astrocyte-derived factors instruct differentiation of embryonic stem cells into neurons,” Neuroscience Research, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 241–249, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. D. Milligan and L. R. Watkins, “Pathological and protective roles of glia in chronic pain,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 23–36, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. McMahon, W. B. J. Cafferty, and F. Marchand, “Immune and glial cell factors as pain mediators and modulators,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 192, no. 2, pp. 444–462, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Huang, J. Wang, P. Kivisakk, B. J. Rollins, and R. M. Ransohoff, “Absence of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 in mice leads to decreased local macrophage recruitment and antigen-specific T helper cell type 1 immune response in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 193, no. 6, p. 713, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. L. Lee, K. Shih, P. Bao, R. S. Ghirnikar, and L. F. Eng, “Cytokine chemokine expression in contused rat spinal cord,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 36, no. 4-5, pp. 417–425, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Conductier, N. Blondeau, A. Guyon, J.-L. Nahon, and C. Rovère, “The role of monocyte chemoattractant protein MCP1/CCL2 in neuroinflammatory diseases,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 224, no. 1-2, pp. 93–100, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Hinojosa, J. R. Caso, B. García-Bueno, J. C. Leza, and J. L. M. Madrigal, “Dual effects of noradrenaline on astroglial production of chemokines and pro-inflammatory mediators,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 10, article 81, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Hinojosa, B. García-Bueno, J. C. Leza, and J. L. M. Madrigal, “Regulation of CCL2/MCP-1 production in astrocytes by desipramine and atomoxetine: involvement of α2 adrenergic receptors,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 86, no. 5-6, pp. 326–333, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bekker and M. K. Sturaitis, “Dexmedetomidine for neurological surgery,” Neurosurgery, vol. 57, supplement 1, pp. 1–10, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Engelhard, C. Werner, E. Eberspächer et al., “The effect of the α2-agonist dexmedetomidine and the N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist S(+)-ketamine on the expression of apoptosis-regulating proteins after incomplete cerebral ischemia and reperfusion in rats,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 524–531, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yan, H. Dai, T. Ding et al., “Effects of dexmedetomidine on the release of glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor from rat astrocyte cells,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 549–557, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Zhang, X. Shan, L. Gu, L. Hertz, and L. Peng, “Dexmedetomidine causes neuroprotection via astrocytic α₂-adrenergic receptor stimulation and HB-EGF release,” journal of Anesthesiology and Clinical Science, vol. 2, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Chen, Z. Zhao, W. E. Code, and L. Hertz, “A correlation between dexmedetomidine-induced biphasic increases in free cytosolic calcium concentration and energy metabolism in astrocytes,” Anesthesia and Analgesia, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 353–357, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Huan Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1470

Downloads

972

Citations