BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2017 / Article
!A Corrigendum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Corrigendum’ tab above.

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 6495867 | 10 pages |

Evaluation of Plasma MicroRNAs as Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarkers in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: miR-196a and miR-210 Could Be Negative and Positive Prognostic Markers, Respectively

Academic Editor: Xin-yuan Guan
Received22 Nov 2016
Accepted09 Jan 2017
Published29 Mar 2017


Background. Identifying diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers that could be targeted in the therapy of pancreatic cancer is essential. Objective. Investigations were conducted with respect to plasma miRNA (miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-20a, and miR-25) expression and clinicopathologic factors to evaluate the prognostic value of miRNAs in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Methods. Plasma miRNAs were detected by real-time quantitative PCR, and the association with clinicopathologic factors was subsequently performed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results. Six miRNAs expressed significantly higher in PDAC patients than in normal individuals were identified. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed. It was evident that miRNA expression associated with PDAC, lymph node metastasis, serosal infiltration, and comprehensive therapy reached significance for overall survival. High miR-196a expression was associated with poor survival (), whereas high miR-210 expression was significantly associated with improved survival (). Multivariate survival analysis indicated that the miR-210 and miR-196a expression signature, lymph node metastasis, and comprehensive therapy were independent factors affecting overall survival. Conclusions. MiRNA expression profile is distinctive in PDAC. Aberrant expression of certain miRNAs was remarkably involved in shaping the overall survival time, which include miR-196a overexpression and decreased miR-210 expression.

1. Introduction

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most fatal cancers worldwide, and it has been a therapeutic challenge for years, due to difficulties and delays in diagnosis, which results in poor prognosis. Pancreatic cancer ranks the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in America [1] and the sixth in China [2]. Poor diagnosis results due to the relatively special anatomical position of the pancreas, which is situated deeply and adjacent to the superior mesenteric vein and artery. Also, the patients in the early stages of pancreatic cancer do not present specific symptoms. Moreover, the radical resection rate of this malignancy is only 10%–15% [3]. Despite surgical resection, the median overall survival in patients with advanced disease stage is about 6 months [4].

During the last decade, the prognosis of pancreatic cancer has not showed any remarkable improvements regardless of the progress in surgical techniques and diagnostic methods. Hence, it is vital to identify distinct in vivo markers for pancreatic cancer in terms of diagnosis and prognosis. This may help to improve the success rates of radical resection and assist in decisions during therapeutic protocols.

The aberrant expression of several miRNAs, considered as diagnostic markers of malignancies, has been widely reported. The overexpression and underexpression of miRNAs have been detected in resected pancreatic cancer tissue specimens, some of which have been evaluated as prognostic markers [58]. It was revealed that miRNAs were stable in the plasma and showed the potential to serve as diagnostic and/or prognostic biomarkers. Earlier report about plasma miRNA profile in patients with pancreatic cancer, by Wang et al. [9], indicated that four miRNAs (miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, and miR-196a) were found to be highly expressed in pancreatic cancer tissues, as well as in the plasma. The four miRNAs had a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 89% for pancreatic cancer. Subsequently, however, Liu et al. [10] reported 6 new miRNA-based biomarkers (miR-20a, miR-24, miR-25, miR-99a, miR-185, and miR-191) along with miR-21 and indicated that they were highly sensitive and specific in distinguishing various stages of PDAC from cancer-free pancreatic tissues. In addition, miR-21 expression levels in the serum were substantially associated with overall survival. On analyzing the diagnostic value of miR-21, miR-155, and miR-196a, Kong et al. [11] suggested that serum miR-196a could be a potential marker for PDAC prognosis.

Considering that as most studies used tissues resected from patients undergoing surgery, we evaluate the association between the plasma miRNA expression profiles in the resected tissues with the overall survival of PDAC patients. This may help in the decision-making process of the therapeutic method in PDAC patients. In this study, six known miRNAs (miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-20a, and miR-25) whose diagnostic value was previously reported were selected for further examination of their prognostic values in PDAC.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Subjects

Our study recruited 31 PDAC patients from the Department of abdominal surgery of the Cancer Hospital and Institute of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Beijing, China) between September 2012 and September 2013, who were confirmed by either pathological examination or fine-needle aspiration cytology (during surgery or by EUS). Twenty-eight healthy individuals were taken up in the study as control, who are all confirmed with healthy conditions after undergoing blood tests and imaging examinations in the Department of Cancer Prevention. This study was conducted in conformity to The Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki), printed in the British Medical Journal (18 July, 1964).

Among the 31 PDAC patients, 20 (64.5%) were male and 11 (35.5%) were female, and the age ranged from 47 to 73 () years. The tumor in 26 patients (83.9%) was in the head and neck region of the pancreas and in 5 patients (16.1%) in the pancreas body and tail. Nine patients (29.1%) had radical surgery, achieving R0 resection. Seventeen patients (54.8%) received palliative surgery. The remaining 5 patients (16.1%) did not undergo any interventions for tumor metastasis or for other reasons. Comprehensive therapy includes postoperative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or intraoperative radiotherapy. Distant liver, lung, or mesenteric dissemination, peritoneal seeding, and supraclavicular lymph node metastases were evaluated before the surgery.

For the patients receiving radical surgery, several characteristics which include tumor size, lymph node metastasis, and serosal or vessel infiltration were evaluated based on the pathological examination. In the patients who received palliative surgery and in those who were unsuitable for surgical treatment, these characteristics were assessed by endoscopic ultrasonography, dynamic computed tomography, or magnetic resonance imaging.

Demographic data for PDAC patients and healthy controls are listed in Table 1. No significant differences in terms of gender, age, cigarette smoking, and alcohol consumption between the two groups () were observed. Clinical characteristics of the PDAC patients are detailed in Table 3.

VariablePaCControl value

 Male20180. 985
Age (years)0.155
Cigarette smoking
Alcohol consumption0.306

2.2. Plasma Collection

Blood samples were collected from individuals in the two groups before surgery or other therapies and centrifuged at at 4°C for 10 min to obtain the plasma for miRNA detection. The plasma was then further centrifuged at at 4°C for 10 min to eliminate larger molecules. Each plasma sample (200 μL at least) was transferred into 1.5 mL Eppendorf tubes and stored at −80°C for further total RNA isolation.

2.3. RNA Extraction

Plasma samples were thawed on ice and 200 μL was transferred into a tube containing 1000 μL Qiazol lysis reagent (Qiagen, Germany). After vortexing, the tube containing the lysate was left at room temperature (15–25°C) for 5 min. Subsequently, 3.5 μL miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Spike-In Control (1.6 × 108 copies/μL working solution, miR-39) (Qiagen, Germany) was added to the tube and samples were mixed thoroughly. RNA was isolated by using miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Kit (Qiagen, Germany) following the manufacture’s protocol. Each 12 μL RNA pellet was placed in the RNase-free collection tube and stored at −80°C.

2.4. Absolute Quantification of Plasma miRNA

Briefly, miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Spike-In Control (miR-39) and 2 μL of plasma-derived total RNA were reversely transcribed according to the Reverse Transcription Reaction Kit protocol. cDNA from miR-39 was diluted to different concentrations following the cDNA serial dilution protocol. All cDNAs were prepared for real-time PCR according to miScript SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen, Germany) protocol. The mean CT values of miRNeasy Serum/Plasma Spike-In Control (miR-39) and samples from each reaction were calculated by using the Roche® LightCycler® 480 software. The standard curves were generated by plotting the log copy number and CT values. The recovery was determined based on absolute quantification (copies/μL) for each sample.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

To employ the SPSS 17.0 software, the Chi-square test was used to examine the differences in the demographic data between the two groups. Quantification of miRNAs’ expression in the two groups was compared by Student’s -test (SPSS 17.0 software). Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) were established to further confirm miRNA expression in PDAC diagnosis. For the univariate survival analysis of conventional prognostic factors, the analysis of median survival time of postoperative survival between the two groups was evaluated based on clinicopathological or miRNAs expression’ level in terms of the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank analysis. Variables with significant values from the univariate analysis were taken into the multivariate analysis by using Cox regression. Only value of less than 0.05 (two-sided) was defined as statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-20a, and miR-25 Have Strong Diagnostic Value of PDAC Patients

The expressions of plasma miRNA (miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-20a, and miR-25) in PDAC patients and healthy controls were detected and compared. The logarithm (base 10) of expression was considered as the evaluation level for its normal distribution. As shown in Table 2 and Figure 1, the expression of six miRNAs in PDAC patients was significantly higher than that in healthy individuals. ROC curves were illustrated in Figure 2. The AUC (area under the curve) was 0.845 for miR-21 [95% CI, 0.740–0.949], 0.687 for miR-210 (95% CI, 0.543–0.831), 0.822 for miR-155 (95% CI, 0.707–0.937), 0.791 for miR-196a (95% CI, 0.665–0.916), 0.884 for miR-20a (95% CI, 0.790–0.978), and 0.763 for miR-25 (95% CI, 0.635–0.891), respectively.

PDAC (lg copies/μL)Control (lg copies/μL) value


CharacteristicNumberMedian survival (month) value

Age (years)0.521
Cigarette smoking0.255
Alcohol consumption0.154
Abdominal pain0.341
Tumor location0.531
 Head and neck266.1
 Body and tail58.8
Operation method0.009
 Radical surgery911.2
 Palliative surgery176.3
 No surgery55.5
Tumor size (cm)0.289
Lymph node metastasis0.001
Serosal infiltration0.002
Vessel infiltration0.053
Comprehensive therapy0.024
Distant metastasis0.079

3.2. miR-196a and miR-210 Expression Reached Significance in Univariate Analysis for Survival Time of PDAC Patients

Prognoses were performed in December 2013, obtaining available data from 31 cases by telephonic follow-up. The overall median survival time was 7.1 months, ranging from 2.3 to 15.2 months. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed and compared by the log-rank test. Factors such as surgical method, lymph node metastasis, serosal infiltration, and comprehensive therapy were largely involved in the survival of the patient (Table 2). Based on the logarithm of absolute quantitative miRNA expression, the median values were taken as a cut-off to catalogue patients into high- and low-miRNA groups, respectively. The median survival times of the two groups for each miRNA were compared. A median survival of 6.3 months (95% CI, 2.3–10.3) was obtained in the high miR-196a group which was significantly shorter than that of 12.5 months (95% CI, 10.0–15.0) in the low miR-196a group (). Furthermore, high miR-210 expression with a median survival of 11.7 months (95% CI, 6.8–16.5) was considerably correlated with an improved survival in comparison to the low miR-210 expression with a median survival of 6.6 months (95% CI, 5.3–7.9) (). There were no significant differences in terms of the survival times (, 0.822, 0.394, and 0.362, resp.) between the high- and low-expression groups for the other four miRNAs (miR-21, miR-155, miR-20a, and miR-25) (Tables 3 and 4, Figure 3).

MST of lower expression (month)MST of higher expression (month) value


3.3. miR-210 Expression, miR-196a Expression, Lymph Node Metastasis, and Comprehensive Therapy Were Independent Factors for Survival Time of PDAC Patients by Multivariate Analysis

By Cox regression analysis, multivariate survival analysis was investigated for all 6 variables with significant values in univariate analysis, such as surgical method, lymph node metastasis, serosal infiltration, comprehensive therapy, and expression of miR-196a and miR-210. Table 5 showed that the overall survival time was significantly dependent on miR-210 expression, miR-196a expression, lymph node metastasis, and comprehensive therapy (, 0.013, 0.009, and 0.045, resp.). Therefore, miR-196a and miR-210 could be regarded as negative and positive prognostic markers, respectively.

Covariant coefficientSE value95% confidence interval

Lymph node metastasis−0.1980.2310.0090.098–1.212
Comprehensive therapy1.2110.5450.0450.055–2.051

4. Discussion

Facing the serious therapeutic and prognostic considerations of pancreatic adenocarcinoma, it is necessary to thoroughly investigate the expression of plasma microRNAs so as to establish their diagnostic and prognostic value for this condition. In this study, we have further confirmed the diagnostic value of six plasma miRNAs (miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-20a, and miR-25), all of which were expressed at significantly higher levels in PDAC patients than in controls, with the values in the range of 0.000 to 0.013 and the AUDs of 0.845, 0.687, 0.822, 0.791, 0.884, and 0.763, respectively. More importantly, we convincingly showed that plasma miR-196a overexpression was significantly associated with poorer survival rate. On the contrary, plasma miR-210 overexpression was observed to demonstrate significantly prolonged survival in PDAC patients. All these indications were based on the multivariate analysis with confounding clinical factors.

In addition to pancreatic cancer, the overexpression of miR-21 has been detected and correlated with poor survival in numerous cancers, such as glioma [12], breast cancer [13], colorectal cancer [14], gastric cancer [15], and prostate cancer [10, 16]. Thus overexpression of such miRNA may lack specificity and sensitivity. MiR-21 has been believed to function as an oncogenic miRNA. Some of miR-21-targeted genes or proteins have been investigated in previous studies. MiR-21 has been shown to affect cell proliferation, invasion, and the clinical outcome by downregulating the expression of tumor suppressors, such as PDCD4 [17, 18], TIMP3 [18], RECK [19], and KRIT1 [20]. The targeting of some other proteins, including Bcl-2, maspin, and PTEN, was also confirmed [6, 21]. Besides, overexpression of miR-21 could be involved in the inhibition of apoptosis as well as the acquisition of invasive properties [2224]. MiR-155 has been reported to be an important diagnostic biomarker for PDAC as it could perform its oncogenic function by repressing proapoptotic tumor proteins [25] and regulate the invasion and migration of pancreatic cancer cells by modulating the STAT3 signaling pathway and by reducing SOCS1 expression [26]. Furthermore, the expression of MLH1 [27] and tumor suppressor SEL1L [28] appeared to be miR-155-modulating targets for the oncogenic function. Additionally, miR-155 was observed to indicate early pancreatic neoplasia [29, 30]. As for the prognosis, some studies demonstrated that high expression of miR-155 in tissues was correlated with poor survival [57]. However, the prognostic value of plasma miR-21 and miR-155 was not found in our study. This was probably explained as a result of the differences between the tissue and the plasma miRNAs expression levels. Alternatively, the limited sample size in this study may also be a reason.

High expression of miR-20a (the miR-17-92 cluster) has been reported in the plasma and tissue samples of patients with colon [31, 32], gastric [33, 34], prostate [35], and cervical cancer [36, 37]. In addition, miR-20a was upregulated at the different stages during nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) progression. The expression level of such miRNA was reversibly associated with the prognosis of NPC [38]. The upregulation of miR-20a was suggested to enhance the metastatic potential of osteosarcoma [39] and breast cancer cells [40]. Interestingly, miR-20a was found to act as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer [41, 42] and inhibit the proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cells by negatively regulating STAT-3 protein expression [43] due to its possible double-sided role in tumors. MiR-25 (the miR-106b-25 cluster) is another double-sided miRNA in tumors. It could accelerate tumor growth and apoptosis by targeting Bim in gastric [44] and liver cancers [45]. Also, it appeared to promote ESCC cell migration and invasion both by overexpressing in tissues and by suppressing DH1 expression [46]. On the other hand, downregulated miR-25 was found in human colon cancer tissues, in which it inhibited cell proliferation and migration in cell lines and suppressed the growth of colon cancer cell xenografts by targeting Smad7 in colon cancer [47]. Therefore, we speculated that the genetic function of miR-20a and miR-25 may be tissue-specific. To date, the roles of miR-20a and miR-25 in the prognosis of pancreatic cancer have not been reported. In this study, there were no evidence to ascertain the expression of miR-20a and miR-25 with respect to survival time in PDAC patients. Thus, more in-depth studies need to be carried out in order to confirm their prognostic potential in PDAC.

Some previous studies evaluated tissue or plasma miR-196a during the survival of PDAC patients [48, 49]. Our study further confirmed that high expression of plasma miR-196a was an independent factor informative about survival time (). MiR-196a has been well believed to be associated with abnormal apoptosis, invasion, and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells by downregulating ING5 expression [50]. In addition, miR-196a was also observed to be significantly deregulated in PanIN II-III, the early stage of PDAC [51]. A number of studies have also been conducted in the relationship between the expression of miR-196a and other malignancies [52, 53].

This is the first study, in the prognosis of PDAC patients, to demonstrate that plasma miR-210 was an independent positive factor based on multivariate analyses (). Despite the possible controversy caused by the contradiction between the diagnostic and prognostic value, our observation was consistent with studies regarding the diagnosis and prognosis of other malignancies such as non-small cell lung cancer [54], renal cell carcinoma [55], and soft-tissue sarcoma [56].

MiR-210 expression was indicated to regulate downstream genes, possibly by ERK- and PI3K/Akt-dependent signaling pathways [57] in the presence of a relative miR-210 upregulation in cardiomyocytes [58] and in adipose-derived stem cells [59]. Several studies found that miR-210 may function as a tumor suppressor by inhibiting ovarian cancer cell proliferation [60, 61]. Disruption of iron homeostasis in cancer cells could be a possible mechanism by which miR-210 constrained cancer cell proliferation [62]. Although miR-210 expression can induce cell migration [57], it did not exhibit any changes in the proliferation of Panc-1 cell lines [63]. MiR-210 was suggested to be able to regulate normoxic gene expression involved in tumor initiation and repress the initiation of tumor growth [64]. This might explain the mechanism of its positive impact on the prognosis of PDAC patients in this study. Greither et al. [7] reported that miR-210 tissue expression reversely correlated with survival time in PDAC patients. The sample origin, however, was tissue, not plasma. Moreover, further validation was performed in a breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) or tissue, neck cancer tissue to confirm that miR-210 was an independent negative prognostic factor for breast cancer and neck cancer patients [65, 66]. And also a meta-analysis of hazard ratio (HR) [67] was performed to evaluate the prognostic role of the miR-210 in different tumors including 9 published studies dealing with various carcinomas suggested that higher expression of miR-210 correlated with worse survival time, especially in breast cancer, and all of the samples are from tissues and most of the samples are from breast cancer patients.

The different prognostic value of miR-210 may be illustrated by the hypoxic environment it exerts the function and miR-210 having different regulatory effects on different cancer type and sample origin, plasm, or tissue. Therefore, the overall balance between pro- and antitumorgenesis genes differs in the specific tumor. Taken together, intensive studies by using large sample sizes are needed to investigate the paired-expression of miRNAs in both the tissue and the plasma for a variety of malignancies.

In summary, our study provided corroborative evidence to support the diagnostic value of six plasma miRNAs (miR-21, miR-210, miR-155, miR-196a, miR-20a, and miR-25) in PDAC patients. Significantly, miR-210 displayed a positive value in terms of prognosis and miR-196a was negative for prognosis. This observation may contribute to the clinical guidance. Furthermore, in-depth studies are needed to illuminate the molecular mechanisms and the therapeutic target(s) of miRNAs in PDAC patients.

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development plan (Grant no. 2016YFA0201503), the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant no. 2014CB542103), and CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (Grant no. 2016-I2M-1-001).


  1. A. Jemal, R. Siegel, E. Ward et al., “Cancer statistics, 2008,” CA Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 71–96, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. W. Chen, R. Zheng, S. Zhang et al., “The incidences and mortalities of major cancers in China, 2009,” Chinese Journal of Cancer, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 106–112, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. F. Sener, A. Fremgen, H. R. Menck, and D. P. Winchester, “Pancreatic cancer: a report of treatment and survival trends for 100,313 patients diagnosed from 1985–1995, using the national cancer database,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Winter, J. L. Cameron, K. A. Campbell et al., “1423 Pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1199–1211, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. G. Papaconstantinou, A. Manta, M. Gazouli et al., “Expression of micrornas in patients with pancreatic cancer and its prognostic significance,” Pancreas, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. B. Jamieson, D. C. Morran, J. P. Morton et al., “MicroRNA molecular profiles associated with diagnosis, clinicopathologic criteria, and overall survival in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 534–545, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. T. Greither, L. F. Grochola, A. Udelnow, C. Lautenschläger, P. Würl, and H. Taubert, “Elevated expression of microRNAs 155, 203, 210 and 222 in pancreatic tumors is associated with poorer survival,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. E. Giovannetti, A. van der Velde, N. Funel et al., “High-throughput microRNA (miRNAs) arrays unravel the prognostic role of MiR-211 in pancreatic cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e49145, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. J. Wang, J. Chen, P. Chang et al., “MicroRNAs in plasma of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients as novel blood-based biomarkers of disease,” Cancer Prevention Research, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 807–813, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Liu, X. Chen, Y. Du et al., “Serum microRNA expression profile as a biomarker in the diagnosis and prognosis of pancreatic cancer,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 610–618, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. X. Kong, Y. Du, G. Wang et al., “Detection of differentially expressed microRNAs in serum of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients: MiR-196a could be a potential marker for poor prognosis,” Digestive Diseases and Sciences, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 602–609, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Q. Wang, P. Li, A. Li et al., “Plasma specific miRNAs as predictive biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of glioma,” Journal of Experimental and Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 31, no. 1, article 97, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Kumar, R. Keerthana, A. Pazhanimuthu, and P. Perumal, “Overexpression of circulating miRNA-21 and miRNA-146a in plasma samples of breast cancer patients,” Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 210–214, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  14. E. K. O. Ng, W. W. S. Chong, H. Jin et al., “Differential expression of microRNAs in plasma of patients with colorectal cancer: a potential marker for colorectal cancer screening,” Gut, vol. 58, no. 10, pp. 1375–1381, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J.-L. Wang, Y. Hu, X. Kong et al., “Candidate microRNA biomarkers in human gastric cancer: a systematic review and validation study,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 9, Article ID e73683, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. S. Mitchell, R. K. Parkin, E. M. Kroh et al., “Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 30, pp. 10513–10518, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. Ma, K.-J. Guo, H. Zhang et al., “Expression of programmed cell death 4 and its clinicopathological significance in human pancreatic cancer,” Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 597–600, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  18. Y. Nagao, M. Hisaoka, A. Matsuyama et al., “Association of microRNA-21 expression with its targets, PDCD4 and TIMP3, in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” Modern Pathology, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 112–121, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. T. Masui, R. Doi, T. Koshiba et al., “RECK expression in pancreatic cancer: its correlation with lower invasiveness and better prognosis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 1779–1784, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  20. F. Orso, F. Balzac, M. Marino, A. Lembo, S. F. Retta, and D. Taverna, “miR-21 coordinates tumor growth and modulates KRIT1 levels,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 438, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. H. Yang, W. Kong, L. L. He et al., “MicroRNA expression profiling in human ovarian cancer: miR-214 induces cell survival and cisplatin resistance by targeting PTEN,” Cancer Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 425–433, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. A. Chan, A. M. Krichevsky, and K. S. Kosik, “MicroRNA-21 is an antiapoptotic factor in human glioblastoma cells,” Cancer Research, vol. 65, no. 14, pp. 6029–6033, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. I. A. Asangani, S. A. K. Rasheed, D. A. Nikolova et al., “MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcriptionally downregulates tumor suppressor Pdcd4 and stimulates invasion, intravasation and metastasis in colorectal cancer,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 15, pp. 2128–2136, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L. R. Jiao, A. E. Frampton, J. Jacob et al., “Micrornas targeting oncogenes are down-regulated in pancreatic malignant transformation from benign tumors,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 2, Article ID e32068, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. Gironella, M. Seux, M.-J. Xie et al., “Tumor protein 53-induced nuclear protein 1 expression is repressed by miR-155, and its restoration inhibits pancreatic tumor development,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 41, pp. 16170–16175, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Huang, H. Li, W. Wu, T. Jiang, and Z. Qiu, “Regulation of miR-155 affects pancreatic cancer cell invasiveness and migration by modulating the STAT3 signaling pathway through SOCS1,” Oncology Reports, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1223–1230, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. W.-J. Liu, Y.-P. Zhao, T.-P. Zhang et al., “MLH1 as a direct target of MiR-155 and a potential predictor of favorable prognosis in pancreatic cancer,” Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1399–1405, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. Q. Liu, J. Chen, J. Wang et al., “Putative tumor suppressor gene SEL1L was downregulated by aberrantly upregulated hsa-mir-155 in human pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” Molecular Carcinogenesis, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 711–721, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. N. Habbe, J.-B. M. Koorstra, J. T. Mendell et al., “MicroRNA miR-155 is a biomarker of early pancreatic neoplasia,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 340–346, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. K. Ryu, S.-M. Hong, C. A. Karikari, R. H. Hruban, M. G. Goggins, and A. Maitra, “Aberrant microRNA-155 expression is an early event in the multistep progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma,” Pancreatology, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 66–73, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Hackl, S. Brunner, K. Fortschegger et al., “miR-17, miR-19b, miR-20a, and miR-106a are down-regulated in human aging,” Aging Cell, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 291–296, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H.-L. Yan, G. Xue, Q. Mei et al., “Repression of the miR‐17‐92 cluster by p53 has an important function in hypoxia‐induced apoptosis,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 28, no. 18, pp. 2719–2732, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Cai, Y. Yuan, Y.-F. Hao, T.-K. Guo, X. Wei, and Y.-M. Zhang, “Plasma microRNAs serve as novel potential biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer,” Medical Oncology, vol. 30, article 452, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Wang, H. Gu, H. Qian et al., “MiR-17-5p/20a are important markers for gastric cancer and murine double minute 2 participates in their functional regulation,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 2010–2021, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. X. Li, J.-H. Pan, B. Song et al., “Suppression of CX43 expression by miR-20a in the progression of human prostate cancer,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 890–898, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H.-W. Kang, F. Wang, Q. Wei et al., “miR-20a promotes migration and invasion by regulating TNKS2 in human cervical cancer cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 586, no. 6, pp. 897–904, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Zhao, D.-S. Yao, J.-Y. Chen, and N. Ding, “Aberrant expression of miR-20a and miR-203 in cervical cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 2289–2293, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. X. Zeng, J. Xiang, M. Wu et al., “Circulating miR-17, miR-20a, miR-29c, and miR-223 combined as non-invasive biomarkers in nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 10, Article ID e46367, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. G. Huang, K. Nishimoto, Z. Zhou, D. Hughes, and E. S. Kleinerman, “miR-20a encoded by the miR-17-92 cluster increases the metastatic potential of osteosarcoma cells by regulating fas expression,” Cancer Research, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 908–916, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J.-Y. Li, Y. Zhang, W.-H. Zhang, S. Jia, Y. Kang, and X.-Y. Zhu, “Differential distribution of miR-20a and miR-20b may underly metastatic heterogeneity of breast cancers,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1901–1906, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Bonauer and S. Dimmeler, “The microRNA-17~92 cluster: still a miRacle?” Cell Cycle, vol. 8, no. 23, pp. 3866–3873, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. Z.-W. Zhang, Y. An, and C.-B. Teng, “The roles of miR-17-92 cluster in mammal development and tumorigenesis,” Hereditas, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1094–1100, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. H. J. Yan, J. X. Wu, W. S. Liu et al., “MicroRNA-20a overexpression inhibited proliferation and metastasis of pancreatic carcinoma cells,” Human Gene Therapy, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1723–1734, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. Y.-K. Kim, J. Yu, T. S. Han et al., “Functional links between clustered microRNAs: suppression of cell-cycle inhibitors by microRNA clusters in gastric cancer,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1672–1681, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Y. Li, W. Q. Tan, T. W. L. Neo et al., “Role of the miR-106b-25 microRNA cluster in hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Science, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 1234–1242, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. X. Xu, Z. Chen, X. Zhao et al., “MicroRNA-25 promotes cell migration and invasion in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 421, no. 4, pp. 640–645, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Q. Li, C. Zou, C. Zou et al., “MicroRNA-25 functions as a potential tumor suppressor in colon cancer by targeting Smad7,” Cancer Letters, vol. 335, no. 1, pp. 168–174, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Bloomston, W. L. Frankel, F. Petrocca et al., “MicroRNA expression patterns to differentiate pancreatic adenocarcinoma from normal pancreas and chronic pancreatitis,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 297, no. 17, pp. 1901–1908, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. E. Szafranska, T. S. Davison, J. John et al., “MicroRNA expression alterations are linked to tumorigenesis and non-neoplastic processes in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 30, pp. 4442–4452, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. Liu, Y. Du, J. Gao et al., “Aberrant expression mir-196a is associated with abnormal apoptosis, invasion, and proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells,” Pancreas, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1169–1181, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. Y. Xue, A. N. Abou Tayoun, K. M. Abo et al., “MicroRNAs as diagnostic markers for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and its precursor, pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasm,” Cancer Genetics, vol. 206, no. 6, pp. 217–221, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. Sun, X.-H. Liu, J.-H. Li et al., “MiR-196a is upregulated in gastric cancer and promotes cell proliferation by downregulating p27 kip1,” Molecular Cancer Therapeutics, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 842–852, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. X.-H. Liu, K.-H. Lu, K.-M. Wang et al., “MicroRNA-196a promotes non-small cell lung cancer cell proliferation and invasion through targeting HOXA5,” BMC Cancer, vol. 12, article 348, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Eilertsen, S. Andersen, S. Al-Saad et al., “Positive prognostic impact of miR-210 in non-small cell lung cancer,” Lung Cancer, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 272–278, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. R. I. McCormick, C. Blick, J. Ragoussis et al., “MiR-210 is a target of hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2 in renal cancer, regulates ISCU and correlates with good prognosis,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1133–1142, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. Greither, P. Würl, L. Grochola et al., “Expression of microRNA 210 associates with poor survival and age of tumor onset of soft-tissue sarcoma patients,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1230–1235, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. T. Takikawa, A. Masamune, S. Hamada, E. Nakano, N. Yoshida, and T. Shimosegawa, “MiR-210 regulates the interaction between pancreatic cancer cells and stellate cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 437, no. 3, pp. 433–439, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. R. K. Mutharasan, V. Nagpal, Y. Ichikawa, and H. Ardehali, “microRNA-210 is upregulated in hypoxic cardiomyocytes through Akt- and p53-dependent pathways and exerts cytoprotective effects,” American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 301, no. 4, pp. H1519–H1530, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. J. H. Kim, S. G. Park, S.-Y. Song, J. K. Kim, and J.-H. Sung, “Reactive oxygen species-responsive miR-210 regulates proliferation and migration of adipose-derived stem cells via PTPN2,” Cell Death and Disease, vol. 4, no. 4, article e588, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Giannakakis, R. Sandaltzopoulos, J. Greshock et al., “miR-210 links hypoxia with cell cycle regulation and is deleted in human epithelial ovarian cancer,” Cancer Biology and Therapy, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 255–264, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. Tsuchiya, T. Fujiwara, F. Sato et al., “MicroRNA-210 regulates cancer cell proliferation through targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor-like 1 (FGFRL1),” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 1, pp. 420–428, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. Y. Yoshioka, N. Kosaka, T. Ochiya, and T. Kato, “Micromanaging iron homeostasis: hypoxia-inducible micro-RNA-210 suppresses iron homeostasis-related proteins,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 41, pp. 34110–34119, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. H. Wang, S. Bian, and C. S. Yang, “Green tea polyphenol EGCG suppresses lung cancer cell growth through upregulating miR-210 expression caused by stabilizing HIF-1α,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1881–1889, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. X. Huang, L. Ding, K. L. Bennewith et al., “Hypoxia-inducible mir-210 regulates normoxic gene expression involved in tumor initiation,” Molecular Cell, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 856–867, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. C. Camps, F. M. Buffa, S. Colella et al., “Hsa-miR-210 is induced by hypoxia and is an independent prognostic factor in breast cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1340–1348, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. H. E. Gee, C. Camps, F. M. Buffa et al., “hsa-mir-210 is a marker of tumor hypoxia and a prognostic factor in head and neck cancer,” Cancer, vol. 116, no. 9, pp. 2148–2158, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. Li, X. Ma, M. Li et al., “Prognostic role of MicroRNA-210 in various carcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Disease Markers, vol. 2014, Article ID 106197, 10 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Qi Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1096 Views | 383 Downloads | 9 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.