Research Article
Labor Induction with Orally Administrated Misoprostol: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Table 1
Maternal and fetal background data, presented per method of induction. Data are presented as numbers (%) or mean (SD).
.
| | Maternal | Misoprostol
() | Dinoproston
() | Amniotomy
() | Balloon catheter
() | Oxytocin
() | Dinoproston
() | value |
| | Age (year) | 33.9
(5.0) | 33.3
(5.0) | 33.1
(5.0) | 32.7
(5.0) | 33.1
(4.9) | 32.7
(5.4) | <0.001 | Parity
(primiparous%) | 1039
(62) | 574
(62) | 348
(46) | 205
(62) | 147
(64) | 51
(63) | <0.001 | | BMI (kg/m2) | 24.5
(4.4) | 24.7
(4.5) | 24.4
(4.7) | 24.0
(4.0) | 24.1
(4.3) | 24.0
(5.1) | 0.13 | Maternal reason for induction
() | | | | | | | <0.001 | PE
(%, ) | 158
(9) | 46
(5) | 27
(4) | 5
(1.5) | 3
(1.5) | 8
(10) | | | ICP | 41
(2.5) | 11
(1) | 10
(1.5) | 9
(2.5) | 1
(0.5) | 1
(1) | | | (%, ) | Diabetes
(%) | 24 | 11 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 | | | (1.5) | (1) | (1) | | | (1) | HT
(%, ) | 19 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 | | | (1) | (1) | (1) | (0.5) | | | Others
(%, ) | 42
(2.5) | 132
(14) | 60
(8) | 37
(11) | 4
(2) | 15
(19) | | | Fetal reason for induction () | | | | | | | <0.001 | Oligohydramnion
(%, ) | 158 | 46 | 30 | 14 | 0 | 6 | | | (9) | (5) | (4) | (4) | | (7) | DFM
(%, ) | 41 | 11 | 31 | 8 | 0 | 1 | | | (2.5) | (1) | (4) | (2) | | (1) | IUGR
(%, ) | 24
(1.5) | 11
(1) | 10
(1.5) | 2
(0.5) | 3
(1) | 11
(14) | | CTG
(%, ) | 19
(1) | 9
(1) | 19
(2.5) | 1
(0.5) | 0 | 3
(4) | | Others
(%, ) | 42
(2.5) | 132
(14) | 15
(2) | 7
(2) | 1
(0.5) | 14
(17) | | | Gestational age (days) | 282
(12) | 284
(13) | 284
(11) | 283
(12) | 275
(12) | 276
(13) | <0.001 | Gender
(boys) | 921
(55) | 504
(54) | 414
(55) | 173
(52) | 130
(57) | 40
(49) | 0.8 | | Years of induction | | | | | | | | | 2009-2010 | 0 | 922 | 471 | 300 | 144 | 61 | | | 2012-2013 | 1675 | 10 | 282 | 33 | 84 | 20 | |
|
|
, , and values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. . cholestasis. . fetal movements. growth retardation; abnormal CTG.
|
