Review Article

The Impact of Volatile Anesthetic Choice on Postoperative Outcomes of Cardiac Surgery: A Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Characteristics of the studies included in this meta-analysis [822].

Study, referenceStudy designType of cardiac surgerySample sizeAnesthetic regimenOutcomesConclusion

Searle et al. 1996 [9]Multicentre, randomized, open-labelled studyCABGIso: 133
Sev: 140
Induction with midazolam (0.1–0.3 mg/kg) and fentanyl (5–15 g/kg), then a bolus of fentanyl 10 g/kg
Iso: 2.3%; Sev: 4.1%. End-tidal concentrations of each anaesthetic vapor were kept less than 2.0 MAC equivalents
Myocardial infarction (assessed with CK-MB and ECG changes), ventricle failure, cardiac death, noncardiac death, and other hemodynamic eventsEither Sev or Iso combined with fentanyl provided acceptable hemodynamic outcomes in patients with low risk who underwent elective CABG

Bennett and Griffin 1999 [10]Prospective, crossover, dose-response studyCABGIso: 8
Sev: 8
Induction with midazolam (1-2 mg), fentanyl 3 g/kg, propofol as required and pancuronium 8 mg; then at sternotomy, fentanyl 4 g/kg and midazolam 1 mg
MAC limits of 0.3 and 1.6 were used for Sev and Iso. In the crossover study, before surgery hemodynamic and cardiac profile were recorded at the following phases: (1) no volatile agent; (2) Iso 0.6%, Sev 0.9% (0.5 MAC); (3) Iso 1.2%, Sev 1.8%; (1.0 MAC); (4) no volatile agent; (5) Iso 0.6%, Sev 0.9% (0.5 MAC); (6) Iso 1.2, Sev 1.8 (1.0 MAC); (7) no volatile agent
Hemodynamic outcomes (HR, CI, SVRI, PVRI, SAP, PAP, CVP, and PCWP). Postoperative outcomes such as time of operation, time to open eyes, time of extubation, recall, memory, PONV, and general condition were also reportedIso and Sev used as the primary anesthetic showed no statistical difference between them at any stage of the study

Bennett and Griffin 2001 [11]Prospective, crossover, dose-response studyValvular surgeryIso: 14
Sev: 13
Induction with midazolam (1-2 mg), fentanyl 3 g/kg, propofol as required and pancuronium 8 mg; then at sternotomy, fentanyl 4 µg/kg and midazolam 3 mg
In the crossover study the protocol used was the same as that of Bennett and Griffin 1999
Same hemodynamic outcomes as measured in Bennett and Griffin 1999 [10]. Postoperative outcomes such as time of operation, time to open eyes, time of extubation, inotrope infusion, use of vasodilators, PONV, and memory were reported as wellSev showed a tendency to lower heart rates and cardiac index compared with Iso. Nonetheless, these findings have shown no significantly difference

Parker et al. 2004 [12]3-arm (isoflurane, sevoflurane, or propofol), randomized, controlled trial with patients and intensive care staff blinded to the drug allocationCABGIso: 118
Sev: 118
Pro: 118
Induction with fentanyl 10 g/kg, diazepam 0.1 mg/kg, and pancuronium 0.15 mg/kg. Then fentanyl 5 g/kg two minutes before sternotomy. During surgery, isoflurane (end-tidal concentration 0.5% to 2%), sevoflurane (end-tidal concentration 1% to 4%), or propofol (target concentration 1–8 g/mL)Time to extubation, ICU stay, and perioperative hemodynamics and perioperative drugs administeredTime to tracheal extubation was significantly longer for the target-controlled propofol group; however a significantly greater number of patients in this group required the use of a vasodilator to control intraoperative hypertension

Kanbak et al. 2007 [13]Prospective and randomized studyCABG with CPBIso: 14
Sev: 14
Des: 14
Before CPB: Group Iso: 1% to 1.5%; Group Sev: 1.5% to 2%; Group Des: 7% to 8%
During CPB: Group Iso: 0.5% to 1%; Group Sev: 1%; Group Des: 4% to 5%
Plasmatic levels of S100 in different operative instances and neuropsychological tests such as Minimental State Examination and Visual-Aura Digit Span TestIso was associated with better neurocognitive functions than Des or Sev after on-pump CABG. Sev seems to be associated with the worst cognitive outcome as assessed by neuropsychological tests, and prolonged brain injury as detected by high S100 levels was seen with Des

Delphin et al. 2007 [14]Prospective and randomized trialOPCABIso: 50
Sev: 51
Volatile agents were titrated to maintain hemodynamic variables within 20% of their baseline values. Both groups received fentanyl 5 g/kgTime variables after the surgery (including duration of anesthesia, duration of surgery, time to extubation, and hospital LOS). Neuropsychological scores and troponin enzyme levels after the surgery were also measuredBoth Sev and Iso may be safely used as maintenance agents in OPCAB. Sev has the advantage of allowing earlier extubation and evaluation of neuropsychological tests after OPCAB

Venkatesh et al. 2007 [15]Prospective and randomized trialOPCABIso: 20
Sev: 20
Induction with thiopentone sodium, midazolam (0.05–0.1 mg/kg) and fentanyl citrate (4 g/Kg). Groups with Sev or Iso 0.5–2% till end-tidal concentration of agent of 1.5–2%. Then fentanyl (50 g) and vecuronium (1 mg) were repeated at regular interval of 1 hour until the end of the surgeryHemodynamic data (HR, MAP, PAP, CI, and others), depth of anesthesia, ischemic changes (assessed through blood CK-MB levels and ECG changes), time of awakening, and time of extubationBoth anesthetics are safe. Sev provides early awakening and extubation as compared with Iso

Yildirim et al. 2009 [16]Prospective, randomized, and controlled trialCABG with CPBIso: 20
Sev: 20
Pro: 20
Iso: induction: 1 g/kg bolus of remifentanil and midazolam 0.1 mg/kg, followed by a continuous infusion of 0.4 g/kg/min; maintenance: 0.3–0.6 g/kg/min of remifentanil and Iso 0.5%–1%
Sev: induction: 1 g/kg bolus of remifentanil followed by a continuous infusion of 0.4 g/kg/min; Sev was started at 8% and when the patient was asleep lowered of 2%; maintenance: 0.3–0.6 g/kg per minute remifentanil and 0.5%–2% Sev
Pro: induction: 1 g/kg bolus of remifentanil, followed by 0.4 g/kg/min and an infusion of propofol 2 g/mL; maintenance: 0.3–0.6 g/kg per minute remifentanil and 2–4 mg/mL infusion of propofol
Hemodynamic data (HR, MAP, PAP, CVP, PCWP, CO, CI, SVRI), myocardial oxidative stress status, and troponin I changesInhalation anesthetics preserved cardiac function in coronary surgery patients after CPB with less evidence for myocardial damage than propofol

Hemmerling et al. 2008 [17]Prospective randomized double-blind trialOPCABIso: 20
Sev: 20
Induction with fentanyl 3 mg/kg, followed by propofol 1-2 mg/kg. 1 MAC for each volatile agent for maintenanceArterial blood gases, peak expiratory flow, hemodynamic data, myocardial protection (measured by blood levels of CK-MB and troponin-T), left ventricular ejection fraction, postoperative pain, and time of extubationBoth volatile agents offer the same myocardial protection but Sev was associated with a shorter time to extubation

Singh et al. 2011 [18]Prospective, randomized single-blinded trialCABG with CPBIso: 59
Sev: 60
TIVA: 61
Induction: intravenous midazolam 2 mg, fentanyl 3–5 mg/kg, and thiopentone 3–5 mg/kg
Maintenance: boluses of fentanyl and midazolam in each group. Iso: 1 MAC; Sev: 1 MAC; TIVA: fentanyl 4 μg/kg/h, and midazolam 0.1 mg/kg/h
Hemodynamic data and S100 blood levelsS100 levels are diminished during Sev use in contrast to Iso and TIVA. The hemodynamic changes in the first 24 h do not seem to be influenced by these interventions

Ceyhan et al. 2011 [19]Prospective and randomized trialCABG with CPBIso: 20
Sev: 20
Induction: etomidate 0.3 mg/kg, a bolus dose of pancuronium 0.1 mg/kg, and remifentanil 1 g/kg was administered
Maintenance: Sev: 2–4%; Iso: 1-2%. Both groups were started on a remifentanil infusion (0.1–0.4 g/kg/min)
Hemodynamic data. Troponin-T, CK, and CK-MB levelsSev provides a better myocardial protection than Iso, with lower levels of troponin-T and CK-MB observed with Sev

Dabrowski et al. 2010 [21]Prospective and randomized trialCABG with CPB and ECCIso: 54
Sev: 59
No volatile: 66
Induction: fentanyl (0.01–0.02 mg/kg), midazolam (0.05–0.1 mg/kg), and etomidate (0.1–0.5 mg/kg)
Maintenance: Iso: 0.5%–1%; Sev: 0.5%–1%
Hemodynamic data and S100 blood levelsAfter cardiac surgery S100 elevation was evidenced. Iso and Sev significantly reduced plasma S100 concentrations

Ozarslan et al. 2012 [20]Prospective and randomized trialCABG with CPBIso: 10
Sev: 10
Des: 10
Induction: etomidate 0.4 mg/kg, vecuronium bromide 0.1 mg/kg, and fentanyl, 1 g/kg
Maintenance: Iso: 1%-2%; Sev: 2%-3%; Des: 4%–6%. All volatile agents were given at 1 MAC in an oxygen-air mixture, and remifentanil was at 0.025 mg/kg/min
Hemodynamic data, laboratory parameter (such as hematocrit, lactate and potassium), and microcirculatory parametersSev had a negative effect on the microcirculation. Iso decreased vascular density and increased flow. Des produced stable effects on the microcirculation. All inhalation agents induced transient alterations in microvascular perfusion

Özgök et al. 2012 [23]Prospective and randomized trialCABG with CPBIso: 20
Sev: 20
Induction: intravenous bolus infusion of midazolam (0.1 mg/kg), fentanyl (15–20 m/kg), and intravenous pancuronium bromide (0.1 mg/kg)
Maintenance: doses of fentanyl 5 g/kg and pancuronium bromide 2 mg were applied repeatedly as required in this group. Sevoflurane or isoflurane was administrated in 1 MAC (minimal alveolar concentration)
Hemodynamic parameters, CK-MB, troponins, lactateNo significant differences between volatile agents

Freiermuth et al. 2016 [22]Prospective and randomized trialCABG with CPB and MECCIso: 15
Sev: 15
Induction: propofol 1-2 mg/kg, fentanyl 3–5 g/kg, and atracurium, 0.5 mg/kg
Maintenance: propofol infusion 4–10 mg/kg/min. The vaporizer was set at a fixed fractional amount of Sev and Iso into the fresh gas supply of 1.8 and 0.8, respectively, at a flow rate of 2-3 L/min
Pharmacokinetics measurements, blood troponin levels, total dose of norepinephrine during MECC, intubation time, ICU LOS, hospital LOS, and mortality within 30 daysSimilar pharmacokinetics regarding wash-in and wash-out for Sev and Iso. No significantly differences in cardiovascular stability and markers of cardiac damage were found

Jones et al. 2016 [8]Pragmatic randomized noninferiority comparative effectiveness clinical trialCABG, CPB, and/or single valve repair or replacementIso: 233
Sev: 231
Induction: fentanyl (5–10 μg/kg) or sufentanil (1–5 μg/kg), midazolam (0.05–0.1 mg/kg), propofol (0.25–1 mg/), and rocuronium (0.6–1.2 mg/kg). Both volatile agents were administered at a dose of 0.5–2.0 MAC throughout the entire operationICU LOS, mortality, troponin T levels, ICU lengths of stay, duration of tracheal intubation, inotrope or vasopressor usage in the ICU, inotrope or vasopressor usage, peak postoperative serum creatinine, new-onset hemodialysis, new-onset atrial fibrillation, use of an intra-aortic balloon pump, perioperative stroke, and ICU readmissionSev is noninferior to isoflurane on a composite outcome of prolonged ICU stay and mortality. Sev is not superior to Iso on any other of the clinically important outcomes

Iso: isoflurane; Sev: sevoflurane; Des: desflurane; Pro: propofol; CABG: coronary artery bypass graft; CPB: cardiopulmonary bypass; ECC: extracorporeal circulation; MECC: minimized extracorporeal circulation; OPCAB: off-pump coronary artery bypass; ECG: electrocardiogram; PONV: postoperative nausea and vomiting; ICU: intensive care unit; LOS: length of stay; CK: creatine kinase; CK-MB: creatine kinase-MB; TIVA: total intravenous anesthesia; Hemodynamic Data. HR: heart rate; MAP: mean arterial pressure; PAP: pulmonary artery pressure; CI: cardiac index; CO: cardiac output; MAC: minimum alveolar concentration; CVP: central venous pressure; PCWP: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure; SVRI: systemic vascular resistance index; SAP: systemic arterial pressure; PVRI: pulmonary vascular resistance index.