Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8530539, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8530539
Research Article

Prognostic Analysis for Cardiogenic Shock in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Receiving Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

1The Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Taichung Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Taichung, Taiwan
2Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
3Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
4School of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
5Division of Pediatric General Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linko, Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
6College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan

Correspondence should be addressed to Han-Ping Wu; moc.liamg@6221ruhtra

Received 10 November 2016; Accepted 4 January 2017; Published 30 January 2017

Academic Editor: Kazuyoshi Suenari

Copyright © 2017 Mao-Jen Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Kunadian, W. Qiu, P. Ludman et al., “Outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock following percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era: an analysis from the BCIS database (British Cardiovascular Intervention Society),” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1374–1385, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Greenberg, A. Assali, H. Assa-Vaknin et al., “Outcome of patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarct and cardiogenic shock: a contemporary single center's experience,” Cardiology, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 83–88, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. N. Aissaoui, E. Puymirat, X. Tabone et al., “Improved outcome of cardiogenic shock at the acute stage of myocardial infarction: a report from the USIK 1995, USIC 2000, and FAST-MI French Nationwide Registries,” European Heart Journal, vol. 33, no. 20, pp. 2535–2543, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. G. C. Sutton, P. Finn, J. A. Hall, A. A. Harcombe, R. A. Wright, and M. A. De Belder, “Predictors of outcome after percutaneous treatment for cardiogenic shock,” Heart, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 339–344, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. De Felice, E. Guerra, R. Fiorilli et al., “One-year clinical outcome of elderly patients undergoing angioplasty for ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: the importance of 3-vessel disease and final TIMI-3 flow grade,” Journal of Invasive Cardiology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 114–118, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Prasad, R. J. Lennon, C. S. Rihal, P. B. Berger, and D. R. Holmes Jr., “Outcomes of elderly patients with cardiogenic shock treated with early percutaneous revascularization,” American Heart Journal, vol. 147, no. 6, pp. 1066–1070, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. O. Koeth, R. Zahn, T. Heer et al., “Gender differences in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock,” Clinical Research in Cardiology, vol. 98, no. 12, pp. 781–786, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. H. D. White, S. F. Assmann, T. A. Sanborn et al., “Comparison of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting after acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results from the should we emergently revascularize occluded coronaries for cardiogenic shock (SHOCK) trial,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 13, pp. 1992–2001, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. S. Park, K. S. Cha, D. S. Lee et al., “Culprit or multivessel revascularisation in ST-elevation myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock,” Heart, vol. 101, no. 15, pp. 1225–1232, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. U. Zeymer, M. Hochadel, H. Thiele et al., “Immediate multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention versus culprit lesion intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: results of the ALKK-PCI registry,” EuroIntervention, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 280–285, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Mylotte, M.-C. Morice, H. Eltchaninoff et al., “Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute myocardial infarction, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and cardiogenic shock: the role of primary multivessel revascularization,” JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 115–125, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. H. Thiele, S. Desch, J. J. Piek et al., “Multivessel versus culprit lesion only percutaneous revascularization plus potential staged revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: design and rationale of CULPRIT-SHOCK trial,” American Heart Journal, vol. 172, pp. 160–169, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. M. Ruiz-Bailén, L. Rucabado-Aguilar, A. M. Castillo-Rivera et al., “Cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome in the Spanish population,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 14, no. 11, pp. PH46–PH57, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. Menon, J. S. Hochman, A. Stebbins et al., “Lack of progress in cardiogenic shock: lessons from the GUSTO trials,” European Heart Journal, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 1928–1936, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Singh, J. White, D. Hasdai et al., “long-term outcome and its predictors among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated by shock. Insights from the GUSTO-I trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 18, pp. 1752–1758, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C.-H. Yang, M.-J. Hsieh, C.-C. Chen et al., “The prognostic significance of SYNTAX score after early percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for acute ST elevation myocardial infarction,” Heart Lung and Circulation, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 341–345, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Kul, O. Akgul, H. Uyarel et al., “High SYNTAX score predicts worse in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 542–548, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Magro, S. Nauta, C. Simsek et al., “Value of the SYNTAX score in patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction: The MI SYNTAXscore study,” American Heart Journal, vol. 161, no. 4, pp. 771–781, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. C.-H. Yang, M.-J. Hsieh, C.-C. Chen et al., “SYNTAX score: an independent predictor of long-term cardiac mortality in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction,” Coronary Artery Disease, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 445–449, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. Palmerini, P. Genereux, A. Caixeta et al., “Prognostic value of the SYNTAX score in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: analysis from the ACUITY (Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage StrategY) trial,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 57, no. 24, pp. 2389–2397, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus