Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 8532149, 6 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8532149
Research Article

Effects of Two Current Great Saphenous Vein Thermal Ablation Methods on Visual Analog Scale and Quality of Life

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Yeditepe University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

Correspondence should be addressed to Soner Sanioglu; moc.liamg@ulgoinas

Received 18 April 2017; Accepted 17 September 2017; Published 16 November 2017

Academic Editor: Nikolaos Siafakas

Copyright © 2017 Soner Sanioglu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Wittens, A. H. Davies, N. Bækgaard, R. Broholm, A. Cavezzi, S. Chastanet et al., “European society for vascular surgery. editor's choice - management of chronic venous disease: clinical practice guidelines of the european society for vascular surgery (ESVS),” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 49, no. 6, pp. 678–737, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  2. P. Gloviczki, A. J. Comerota, M. C. Dalsing et al., “The care of patients with varicose veins and associated chronic venous diseases: clinical practice guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 53, no. 5, supplement, pp. 2S–48S, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. I. Almeida, J. Kaufman, O. Göckeritz et al., “Radiofrequency endovenous closure FAST versus laser ablation for the treatment of great saphenous reflux: a multicenter, single-blinded, randomized study (RECOVERY Study),” Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 752–759, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. S. Gale, J. N. Lee, M. E. Walsh, D. L. Wojnarowski, and A. J. Comerota, “A randomized, controlled trial of endovenous thermal ablation using the 810-nm wavelength laser and the ClosurePLUS radiofrequency ablation methods for superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 645–650, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. D. Goode, A. Chowdhury, M. Crockett et al., “Laser and radiofrequency ablation study (LARA study): a randomised study comparing radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (810 nm),” European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 246–253, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. M. Nordon, R. J. Hinchliffe, R. Brar et al., “A prospective double-blind randomized controlled trial of radiofrequency versus laser treatment of the great saphenous vein in patients with varicose veins,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 254, no. 6, pp. 876–881, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. W. S. J. Malskat, J. Giang, M. G. R. De Maeseneer, T. E. C. Nijsten, and R. R. Van Den Bos, “Randomized clinical trial of 940- versus 1470-nm endovenous laser ablation for great saphenous vein incompetence,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 192–198, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. M. Hirokawa and N. Kurihara, “Comparison of Bare-Tip and Radial Fiber in Endovenous Laser Ablation with 1470 nm Diode Laser,” Annals of Vascular Diseases, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 239–245, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. O. Bozoglan, B. Mese, E. Eroglu et al., “Comparison of endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation in treating varicose veins in the same patient,” Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. E. Ware Jr. and B. Gandek, “Overview of the SF-36 health survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 903–912, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. Reporting standarts in venous disease, “Prepared by the subcommittee on reporting standards in venous disease, ad hoc committee on reporting standarts, Society for Vascular Surgery/North American Chapter, International Society for Cardiovascular Surgery,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 172–181, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. B. Rutherford, F. T. Padberg Jr., A. J. Comerota, R. L. Kistner, M. H. Meissner, and G. L. Moneta, “Venous severity scoring: An adjunct to venous outcome assessment,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1307–1312, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. P. Lingam, Tan J. Z., Q. Hong, S. Chandrassekar, s. Narayanan et al., 2017, Comparison of EVRF versus VNUS in Radiofrequency Ablation of Chronic Venous Insufficiency http://fcaresystems.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Comparison-of-EVRF-versus-VNUS.pdf.
  14. T. Yamamoto and M. Sakata, “Influence of fibers and wavelengths on the mechanism of action of endovenous laser ablation,” Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Mendes-Pinto, P. Bastianetto, L. Cavalcanti Bragalyra, R. Kikuchi, and L. Kabnick, “Endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein comparing 1920-nm and 1470-nm diode laser,” International Angiology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 599–604, 2016. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus