Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 8905637, 11 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8905637
Review Article

Combining Upper Limb Robotic Rehabilitation with Other Therapeutic Approaches after Stroke: Current Status, Rationale, and Challenges

1The BioRobotics Institute, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna, Pisa, Italy
2Rehabilitation Bioengineering Laboratory, Volterra, Italy
3Centre de Rééducation Fonctionnelle Les Trois Soleils, Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Unité de Neurorééducation, Boissise-Le-Roi, France
4Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien, Neurologie, Corbeil-Essonnes, France

Correspondence should be addressed to Stefano Mazzoleni; ti.asipannatnas@inelozzam.onafets

Received 3 January 2017; Revised 12 July 2017; Accepted 10 August 2017; Published 13 September 2017

Academic Editor: Erwin van Wegen

Copyright © 2017 Stefano Mazzoleni et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. L. Kolominsky-Rabas, M. Weber, O. Gefeller, B. Neundoerfer, and P. U. Heuschmann, “Epidemiology of ischemic stroke subtypes according to TOAST criteria: incidence, recurrence, and long-term survival in ischemic stroke subtypes: a population-based study,” Stroke, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 2735–2740, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and R. C. Wagenaar, “Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 473–479, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Langhorne, J. Bernhardt, and G. Kwakkel, “Stroke rehabilitation,” The Lancet, vol. 377, no. 9778, pp. 1693–1702, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. S. Balami and A. M. Buchan, “Complications of intracerebral haemorrhage,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101–118, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. F. Chollet and J.-F. Albucher, “Strategies to augment recovery after stroke,” Current Treatment Options in Neurology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 531–540, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Taqi, N. Vora, R. C. Callison, R. Lin, and T. J. Wolfe, “Past, present, and future of Endovascular stroke therapies,” Neurology, vol. 79, no. 13, pp. S213–S220, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. P. Langhorne, F. Coupar, and A. Pollock, “Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 8, no. 8, pp. 741–754, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. B. B. Johansson, “Current trends in stroke rehabilitation. A review with focus on brain plasticity,” Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 147–159, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. K. N. Arya, S. Pandian, R. Verma, and R. K. Garg, “Movement therapy induced neural reorganization and motor recovery in stroke: a review,” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 528–537, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. L. Brewer, F. Horgan, A. Hickey, and D. Williams, “Stroke rehabilitation: recent advances and future therapies,” QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 11–25, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. F. Buma, G. Kwakkel, and N. Ramsey, “Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 707–722, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Bütefisch, H. Hummelsheim, P. Denzler, and K.-H. Mauritz, “Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 59–68, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. V. Cooke, K. Mares, A. Clark, R. C. Tallis, and V. M. Pomeroy, “The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BMC Medicine, vol. 8, article 60, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. H. Feys, W. de Weerdt, and G. Verbeke, “Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: a 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 924–929, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. G. Kwakkel, R. C. Wagenaar, J. W. R. Twisk, G. J. Lankhorst, and J. C. Koetsier, “Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial,” The Lancet, vol. 354, no. 9174, pp. 191–196, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. G. Kwakkel, B. Kollen, and E. Lindeman, “Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 3-4, pp. 281–299, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. N. B. Lincoln, R. H. Parry, and C. D. Vass, “Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke,” Stroke, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 573–579, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Kwakkel, R. van Peppen, R. C. Wagenaar et al., “Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis,” Stroke, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2529–2536, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. M. Veerbeek, E. van Wegen, R. van Peppen et al., “What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? a systematic review and meta-analysis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 2, Article ID e87987, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. H. I. Krebs, M. L. Aisen, B. T. Volpe, and N. Hogan, “Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 4645–4649, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. Zollo, L. Rossini, M. Bravi, G. Magrone, S. Sterzi, and E. Guglielmelli, “Quantitative evaluation of upper-limb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1131–1144, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Gilliaux, T. M. Lejeune, C. Detrembleur et al., “Using the robotic device REAplan as a valid, reliable, and sensitive too l to quantify upper limb impairments in stroke patients,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 117–125, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Mazzoleni, P. Sale, M. Tiboni, M. Franceschini, M. C. Carrozza, and F. Posteraro, “Upper limb robot-assisted therapy in chronic and subacute stroke patients: a kinematic analysis,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 92, Supplement 1, no. 10, pp. e26–e37, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  24. H. I. Krebs, M. Krams, D. K. Agrafiotis et al., “Robotic measurement of arm movements after stroke establishes biomarkers of motor recovery,” Stroke, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 200–204, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. C. Shirota, J. Jansa, J. Diaz et al., “On the assessment of coordination between upper extremities: towards a common language between rehabilitation engineers, clinicians and neuroscientists,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 13, no. 1, article 80, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Duret, O. Courtial, and A. G. Grosmaire, “Kinematic measures for upper limb motor assessment during robot-mediated training in patients with severe sub-acute stroke,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 237–245, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. Pollock, S. E. Farmer, M. C. Brady et al., “Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke,” The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 11, p. CD010820, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  28. R. Riener, T. Nef, and G. Colombo, “Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. R. C. V. Loureiro, W. S. Harwin, K. Nagai, and M. Johnson, “Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 49, no. 10, pp. 1103–1118, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. W. H. Chang and Y.-H. Kim, “Robot-assisted therapy in stroke rehabilitation,” Journal of Stroke, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 174–181, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. F. Yakub, A. Z. Md. Khudzari, and Y. Mori, “Recent trends for practical rehabilitation robotics, current challenges and the future,” International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. C. Zhang, C. W. Li-Tsang, and R. K. Au, “Robotic approaches for the rehabilitation of upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 19–28, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  33. G. Kwakkel, B. J. Kollen, and H. I. Krebs, “Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. N. Norouzi-Gheidari, P. S. Archambault, and J. Fung, “Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 479–496, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. J. Mehrholz, M. Pohl, T. Platz, J. Kugler, and B. Elsner, “Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 11, p. CD006876, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. M. Veerbeek, A. C. Langbroek-Amersfoort, E. E. H. Van Wegen, C. G. M. Meskers, and G. Kwakkel, “Effects of robot-assisted therapy for the upper limb after stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 107–121, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. R. Bertani, C. Melegari, M. C. De Cola, A. Bramanti, P. Bramanti, and R. S. Calabrò, “Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis,” Neurological Sciences, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. J. L. Patton, M. E. Stoykov, M. Kovic, and F. A. Mussa-Ivaldi, “Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors,” Experimental Brain Research, vol. 168, no. 3, pp. 368–383, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. F. Abdollahi, E. D. Case Lazarro, and M. Listenberger, “Error augmentation enhancing arm recovery in individuals with chronic stroke: a randomized crossover design,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 28, pp. 120–128, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. M. L. Aisen, H. I. Krebs, N. Hogan, F. McDowell, and B. T. Volpe, “The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 443–446, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. O. Schuhfried, R. Crevenna, V. Fialka-Moser, and T. Paternostro-Sluga, “Non-invasive neuromuscular electrical stimulation in patients with central nervous system lesions: an educational review,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 99–105, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Meadmore, T. Exell, C. Freeman et al., “Electrical stimulation and iterative learning control for functional recovery in the upper limb post-stroke,” in Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR '13, vol. 2013, June 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. A. K. Vafadar, J. N. Côté, and P. S. Archambault, “Effectiveness of functional electrical stimulation in improving clinical outcomes in the upper arm following stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 729768, 14 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. O. A. Howlett, N. A. Lannin, L. Ada, and C. Mckinstry, “Functional electrical stimulation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review with meta-analysis,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 96, no. 5, Article ID 56090, pp. 934–943, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. J. Eraifej, W. Clark, B. France, S. Desando, and D. Moore, “Effectiveness of upper limb functional electrical stimulation after stroke for the improvement of activities of daily living and motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Systematic Reviews, vol. 6, no. 1, article no. 40, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. G. Alon, A. F. Levitt, and P. A. McCarthy, “Functional electrical stimulation enhancement of upper extremity functional recovery during stroke rehabilitation: a pilot study,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 207–215, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. Mangold, C. Schuster, T. Keller, A. Zimmermann-Schlatter, and T. Ettlin, “Motor training of upper extremity with functional electrical stimulation in early stroke rehabilitation,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 184–190, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. R. de Kroon, M. J. IJzerman, J. Chae, G. J. Lankhorst, and G. Zilvold, “Relation between stimulation characteristics and clinical outcome in studies using electrical stimulation to improve motor control of the upper extremity in stroke,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 65–74, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. B. Popović and M. B. Popović, “Hybrid assistive systems for rehabilitation: lessons learned from functional electrical therapy in hemiplegics,” in Proceedings of the 28th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS'06, vol. 1, pp. 2146–2149, September 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. R. J. Oconnor, A. Jackson, S. G. Makower, A. Cozens, and M. Levesley, “A proof of concept study investigating the feasibility of combining iPAM robot assisted rehabilitation with functional electrical stimulation to deliver whole arm exercise in stroke survivors,” Journal of Medical Engineering and Technology, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 411–418, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. C. Lyle, “A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research,” International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 483–492, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Penta, L. Tesio, C. Arnould, A. Zancan, and J.-L. Thonnard, “The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment,” Stroke, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 1627–1634, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. A. R. Fugl-Meyer, L. Jaasko, I. Leyman, S. Olsson, and S. Steglind, “The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance,” Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 13–31, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  54. K. L. Meadmore, A.-M. Hughes, C. T. Freeman et al., “Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 9, no. 1, article 32, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. X.-L. Hu, R. K.-Y. Tong, N. S. K. Ho, J.-J. Xue, W. Rong, and L. S. W. Li, “Wrist rehabilitation assisted by an electromyography-driven neuromuscular electrical stimulation robot after stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 767–776, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. H. Miyasaka, A. Orand, H. Ohnishi, G. Tanino, K. Takeda, and S. Sonoda, “Ability of electrical stimulation therapy to improve the effectiveness of robotic training for paretic upper limbs in patients with stroke,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1172–1175, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. F. Resquín, A. Cuesta Gómez, J. Gonzalez-Vargas et al., “Hybrid robotic systems for upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: a review,” Medical Engineering and Physics, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1279–1288, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. S. Bashir, I. Mizrahi, K. Weaver, F. Fregni, and A. Pascual-Leone, “Assessment and modulation of neural plasticity in rehabilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation,” PM and R, vol. 2, no. 12, pp. 253–268, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. D. Schaechter, “Motor rehabilitation and brain plasticity after hemiparetic stroke,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. S. Young and K. H. Kong, “Emerging therapies in stroke rehabilitation,” ANNALS Academy of Medicine Singapore, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 58–61, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  61. M. Ameli, C. Grefkes, F. Kemper et al., “Differential effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over ipsilesional primary motor cortex in cortical and subcortical middle cerebral artery stroke,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 298–309, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. T. H. Emara, R. R. Moustafa, N. M. Elnahas et al., “Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at 1 Hz and 5 Hz produces sustained improvement in motor function and disability after ischaemic stroke,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1203–1209, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, M. Petoe, S. Anwar, and W. D. Byblow, “The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke,” Brain, vol. 135, no. 8, pp. 2527–2535, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M.-H. Milot, S. J. Spencer, V. Chan et al., “Corticospinal excitability as a predictor of functional gains at the affected upper limb following robotic training in chronic stroke survivors,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 819–827, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. C. Buetefisch, R. Heger, W. Schicks, R. Seitz, and J. Netz, “Hebbian-type stimulation during robot-assisted training in patients with stroke,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 645–655, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. P. Lefaucheur, N. André-Obadia, A. Antal et al., “Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS),” Clinical Neurophysiology Journal, vol. 125, no. 11, pp. 2150–2206, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  67. M. Abo, W. Kakuda, R. Momosaki et al., “Randomized, multicenter, comparative study of NEURO versus CIMT in poststroke patients with upper limb hemiparesis: The NEURO-VERIFY Study,” International Journal of Stroke, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 607–612, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Avenanti, M. Coccia, E. Ladavas, L. Provinciali, and M. G. Ceravolo, “Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial,” Neurology, vol. 78, no. 4, pp. 256–264, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. S. Etoh, T. Noma, K. Ikeda et al., “Effects of repetitive trascranial magnetic stimulation on repetitive facilitation exercises of the hemiplegic hand in chronic stroke patients,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 843–847, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. S. C. B. Galvão, R. B. C. dos Santos, P. B. dos Santos, M. E. Cabral, and K. Monte-Silva, “Efficacy of coupling repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and physical therapy to reduce upper limb spasticity in stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 222–229, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. W. H. Chang, Y. H. Kim, W. K. Yoo et al., “rTMS with motor training modulates cortico-basal ganglia-thalamocortical circuits in stroke patients,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 179–189, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  72. P. Graef, M. L. R. Dadalt, D. A. M. da Silva Rodrigués, C. Stein, and A. de Souza Pagnussat, “Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with upper-limb training for improving function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 369, pp. 149–158, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. K. Hosomi, S. Morris, T. Sakamoto et al., “Daily repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke upper limb paresis in the subacute period,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1655–1664, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. D. J. Edwards, “On the understanding and development of modern physical neurorehabilitation methods: robotics and non-invasive brain stimulation,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 6, no. 1, article 3, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. J. Lefaucheur, A. Antal, S. S. Ayache, D. H. Benninger, J. Brunelin, F. Cogiamanian et al., “Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS),” Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 56–92, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. A. Y. Kabakov, P. A. Muller, A. Pascual-Leone, F. E. Jensen, and A. Rotenberg, “Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 107, no. 7, pp. 1881–1889, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. R. Lindenberg, V. Renga, L. L. Zhu, D. Nair, and G. Schlaug, “Bihemispheric brain stimulation facilitates motor recovery in chronic stroke patients,” Neurology, vol. 75, no. 24, pp. 2176–2184, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. F. Hummel, P. Celnik, P. Giraux et al., “Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke,” Brain, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 490–499, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. L. V. Bradnam, C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, and W. D. Byblow, “Contralesional hemisphere control of the proximal paretic upper limb following stroke,” Cerebral Cortex, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2662–2671, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. D. Wu, L. Qian, R. D. Zorowitz, L. Zhang, Y. Qu, and Y. Yuan, “Effects on decreasing upper-limb poststroke muscle tone using transcranial direct current stimulation: a randomized sham-controlled study,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. H. Mahmoudi, A. B. Haghighi, P. Petramfar, S. Jahanshahi, Z. Salehi, and F. Fregni, “Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 15-16, pp. 1383–1388, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. M. Zimerman, K. F. Heise, J. Hoppe, L. G. Cohen, C. Gerloff, and F. C. Hummel, “Modulation of training by single-session transcranial direct current stimulation to the intact motor cortex enhances motor skill acquisition of the paretic hand,” Stroke, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2185–2191, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. D. J. Edwards, H. I. Krebs, A. Rykman et al., “Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke,” Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 199–207, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  84. S. Hesse, A. Waldner, J. Mehrholz, C. Tomelleri, M. Pohl, and C. Werner, “Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: an exploratory, randomized multicenter trial,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 838–846, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. L. T. Triccas, J. H. Burridge, A. Hughes, G. Verheyden, M. Desikan, and J. Rothwell, “A double-blinded randomised controlled trial exploring the effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation and uni-lateral robot therapy for the impaired upper limb in sub-acute and chronic stroke,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. D. Simonetti, L. Zollo, S. Milighetti et al., “Literature review on the effects of tDCS coupled with robotic therapy in post stroke upper limb rehabilitation,” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, vol. 11, article 268, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. V. Giacobbe, H. I. Krebs, B. T. Volpe et al., “Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and robotic practice in chronic stroke: the dimension of timing,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  88. S. Straudi, F. Fregni, C. Martinuzzi, C. Pavarelli, S. Salvioli, and N. Basaglia, “tDCS and robotics on upper limb stroke rehabilitation: effect modification by stroke duration and type of stroke,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 5068127, 8 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. M. Ochi, S. Saeki, T. Oda, Y. Matsushima, and K. Hachisuka, “Effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy on severely affected arms in chronic stroke patients,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 137–140, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. S. V. Adamovich, G. G. Fluet, E. Tunik, and A. S. Merians, “Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 29–44, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. G. Saposnik and M. Levin, “Virtual reality in stroke rehabilitation: a meta-analysis and implications for clinicians,” Stroke, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1380–1386, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. J. E. Deutsch, A. Brettler, C. Smith et al., “Nintendo Wii sports and Wii fit game analysis, validation, and application to stroke rehabilitation,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 701–719, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. A. Viau, A. G. Feldman, B. J. McFadyen, and M. F. Levin, “Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis,” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 1, no. 1, article 11, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. A. Y. Dvorkin, M. Shahar, and P. L. Weiss, “Reaching within video-capture virtual reality: using virtual reality as a motor control paradigm,” Cyberpsychology and Behavior, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 133–136, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. K. R. Lohse, C. G. E. Hilderman, K. L. Cheung, S. Tatla, and H. F. M. Van Der Loos, “Virtual reality therapy for adults post-stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis exploring virtual environments and commercial games in therapy,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 3, Article ID e93318, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. K. E. Laver, S. George, S. Thomas, J. E. Deutsch, and M. Crotty, “Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation,” The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, vol. 2, p. CD008349, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. G. C. Palma, T. B. Freitas, G. M. Bonuzzi et al., “Effects of virtual reality for stroke individuals based on the International Classification of Functioning and Health: a systematic review,” Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 269–278, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. A. D. Mauro, E. Carrasco, D. Oyarzun et al., “Advanced hybrid technology for neurorehabilitation: the HYPER project,” Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol. 26, pp. 89–108, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. G. Epelde, X. Valencia, A. Ardanza et al., “Virtual arm representation and multimodal monitoring for the upper limb robot assisted teletherapy,” in Proceedings of the International Congress on Neurotechnology, Electronics and Informatics (NEUROTECHNIX’13), vol. 43, pp. 69–80, January 2013.
  100. F. Grimm and A. Gharabaghi, “Closed-loop neuroprosthesis for reach-to-grasp assistance: combining adaptive multi-channel neuromuscular stimulation with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. A. Frisoli, E. Sotgiu, C. Procopio, M. Bergamasco, B. Rossi, and C. Chisari, “Design and implementation of a training strategy in chronic stroke with an arm robotic exoskeleton,” in Proceedings of the Rehab Week Zurich 2011 - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR 2011, vol. 2011, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. A. Frisoli, L. Borelli, A. Montagner et al., “Arm rehabilitation with a robotic exoskeleleton in Virtual Reality,” in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE 10th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR '07, pp. 631–642, nld, June 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. C. D. Takahashi, L. Der-Yeghiaian, V. Le, R. R. Motiwala, and S. C. Cramer, “Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 425–437, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. A. S. Merians, E. Tunik, and S. V. Adamovich, “Virtual reality to maximize function for hand and arm rehabilitation: exploration of neural mechanisms,” Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, vol. 145, pp. 109–125, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. K. O. Thielbar, T. J. Lord, H. C. Fischer et al., “Training finger individuation with a mechatronic-virtual reality system leads to improved fine motor control post-stroke,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, article no. 690, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. A. Maris, K. Coninx, H. Seelen et al., “The impact of robot-mediated adaptive I-TRAVLE training on impaired upper limb function in chronic stroke and multiple sclerosis,” Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, pp. 1–9, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. D. M. Simpson, A. Blitzer, A. Brashear et al., “Assessment: botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of movement disorders (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology,” Neurology, vol. 70, no. 19, pp. 1699–1706, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. L. Shaw, Rodgers, C. Price et al., “BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 14, no. 26, pp. 1–113, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. J.-M. Gracies, A. Brashear, R. Jech et al., “Safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA for hemiparesis in adults with upper limb spasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a double-blind randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 14, no. 10, article no. 148, pp. 992–1001, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. Y. Dong, T. Wu, X. Hu, and T. Wang, “Efficacy and safety of Botulinum Toxin type A for upper limb spasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis,” European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  111. M. Vinti, F. Costantino, N. Bayle, D. M. Simpson, D. J. Weisz, and J.-M. Gracies, “Spastic cocontraction in hemiparesis: effects of botulinum toxin,” Muscle and Nerve, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 926–931, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. F. I. Mahoney and D. W. Barthel, “Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index,” Maryland State Medical Journal, vol. 14, pp. 61–65, 1965. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  113. M. Beninato, K. M. Gill-Body, S. Salles, P. C. Stark, R. M. Black-Schaffer, and J. Stein, “Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. C. Anderson, S. Laubscher, and R. Burns, “Validation of the short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire among stroke patients,” Stroke, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1812–1816, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  115. R. L. Rosales, F. Efendy, E. S. Teleg et al., “Botulinum toxin as early intervention for spasticity after stroke or non-progressive brain lesion: a meta-analysis,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 371, pp. 6–14, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. S. Hesse and C. Werner, “Poststroke motor dysfunction and spasticity: novel pharmacological and physical treatment strategies,” CNS Drugs, vol. 17, no. 15, pp. 1093–1107, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. F. Posteraro, S. Mazzoleni, S. Aliboni et al., “Upper limb spasticity reduction following active training: a robot-mediated study in patients with chronic hemiparesis,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 279–281, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. P. Sale, M. Franceschini, S. Mazzoleni, E. Palma, M. Agosti, and F. Posteraro, “Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 11, no. 1, article 104, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. F. Bovolenta, P. Sale, V. Dall'Armi, P. Clerici, and M. Franceschini, “Robot-aided therapy for upper limbs in patients with stroke-related lesions. Brief report of a clinical experience,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 8, no. 1, article no. 18, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. A. C. Lo, Guarino P. D., L. G. Richards et al., “Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 362, no. 19, pp. 1772–1783, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. S. E. Fasoli, M. Fragala-Pinkham, R. Hughes, N. Hogan, H. I. Krebs, and J. Stein, “Upper limb robotic therapy for children with hemiplegia,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 87, no. 11, pp. 929–936, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. F. Frascarelli, L. Masia, G. Di Rosa, M. Petrarca, P. Cappa, and E. Castelli, “Robot-mediated and clinical scales evaluation after upper limb botulinum toxin type A injection in children with hemiplegia,” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 988–994, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. T. Takebayashi, S. Amano, K. Hanada et al., “Therapeutic synergism in the treatment of post-stroke arm paresis utilizing botulinum toxin, robotic therapy, and constraint-induced movement therapy,” PM and R, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1054–1058, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. G. V. Pennati, C. Da Re, I. Messineo, and D. Bonaiuti, “How could robotic training and botolinum toxin be combined in chronic post stroke upper limb spasticity? A pilot study,” European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 381–387, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  125. K. Saita, T. Morishita, K. Hyakutake et al., “Combined therapy using botulinum toxin A and single-joint hybrid assistive limb for upper-limb disability due to spastic hemiplegia,” Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 373, pp. 182–187, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. D. L. Turner, A. Ramos-Murguialday, N. Birbaumer, U. Hoffmann, and A. Luft, “Neurophysiology of robot-mediated training and therapy: a perspective for future use in clinical populations,” Frontiers in Neurology, vol. 4, article 184, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. C. M. Stinear, P. A. Barber, J. P. Coxon, M. K. Fleming, and W. D. Byblow, “Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke,” Brain, vol. 131, no. 5, pp. 1381–1390, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. V. Di Lazzaro, F. Capone, G. Di Pino et al., “Combining robotic training and non-invasive brain stimulation in severe upper limb-impaired chronic stroke patients,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 10, article no. 88, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. K. M. Malloy and L. S. Milling, “The effectiveness of virtual reality distraction for pain reduction: a systematic review,” Clinical Psychology Review, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 1011–1018, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. G. Rosati, F. Oscari, D. J. Reinkensmeyer et al., “Improving robotics for neurorehabilitation: Enhancing engagement, performance, and learning with auditory feedback,” in Proceedings of the Rehab Week Zurich 2011 - 2011 IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, ICORR '11, vol. 2011, July 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. R. Secoli, M.-H. Milot, G. Rosati, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, “Effect of visual distraction and auditory feedback on patient effort during robot-assisted movement training after stroke,” Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 8, no. 1, article no. 21, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. M. C. Cirstea and M. F. Levin, “Improvement of arm movement patterns and endpoint control depends on type of feedback during practice in stroke survivors,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 398–411, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  133. L. Dipietro, H. I. Krebs, S. E. Fasoli et al., “Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 757–768, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. N. Hogan, H. I. Krebs, B. Rohrer et al., “Motions or muscles? Some behavioral factors underlying robotic assistance of motor recovery,” The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 605–618, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. H. I. Krebs, S. Mernoff, S. E. Fasoli, R. Hughes, J. Stein, and N. Hogan, “A comparison of functional and impairment-based robotic training in severe to moderate chronic stroke: a pilot study,” NeuroRehabilitation, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 81–87, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. M. Jeannerod, “The origin of voluntary action. History of a physiological concept,” Comptes Rendus - Biologies, vol. 329, no. 5-6, pp. 354–362, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. A. A. Blank, J. A. French, A. U. Pehlivan, and M. K. O’Malley, “Current trends in robot-assisted upper-limb stroke rehabilitation: promoting patient engagement in therapy,” Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 184–195, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. W. Schultz, “Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 57, pp. 87–115, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  139. P. Ramkumar, B. Dekleva, S. Cooler, L. Miller, and K. Kording, “Premotor and motor cortices encode reward,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 8, Article ID e0160851, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. R. N. Goodman, J. C. Rietschel, A. Roy et al., “Increased reward in ankle robotics training enhances motor control and cortical efficiency in stroke,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 213–227, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. E. A. A. Rameckers, L. A. W. M. Speth, J. Duysens, J. S. H. Vles, and B. C. M. Smits-Engelsman, “Kinematic aiming task: measuring functional changes in hand and arm movements after botulinum toxin-A injections in children with spastic hemiplegia,” American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 86, no. 7, pp. 538–547, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. A. H. Mackey, F. Miller, S. E. Walt, M.-C. Waugh, and N. S. Stott, “Use of three-dimensional kinematic analysis following upper limb botulinum toxin a for children with hemiplegia,” European Journal of Neurology, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 1191–1198, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  143. E. A. Fridman, M. Crespo, S. G. Argüello et al., “Kinematic improvement following Botulinum Toxin-A injection in upper-limb spasticity due to stroke,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 423–427, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. D. Bensmail, J. V. G. Robertson, C. Fermanian, and A. Roby-Brami, “Botulinum toxin to treat upper-limb spasticity in hemiparetic patients: analysis of function and kinematics of reaching movements,” Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 273–281, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus