Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017, Article ID 9016826, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9016826
Research Article

Instrument Variables for Reducing Noise in Parallel MRI Reconstruction

1Computer Science and Engineering Technology Department, University of Houston-Downtown, Houston, TX 77002, USA
2Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA 02129, USA
3Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
4School of Information Science and Engineering, Institute of Life Sciences, Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Yuanjie Zheng; moc.liamg@noisiv.gnehz

Received 25 August 2016; Revised 26 November 2016; Accepted 12 December 2016; Published 19 January 2017

Academic Editor: Jiun-Jie Wang

Copyright © 2017 Yuchou Chang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. A. Griswold, P. M. Jakob, R. M. Heidemann et al., “Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA),” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1202–1210, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. Nana, T. Zhao, K. Heberlein, S. M. LaConte, and X. Hu, “Cross-validation-based kernel support selection for improved GRAPPA reconstruction,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 819–825, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. Park, Q. Zhang, V. Jellus, O. Simonetti, and D. Li, “Artifact and noise suppression in GRAPPA imaging using improved k-space coil calibration and variable density sampling,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 186–193, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. Z. Wang, J. Wang, and J. A. Detre, “Improved data reconstruction method for GRAPPA,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 738–742, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. P. Qu, C. Wang, and G. X. Shen, “Discrepancy-based adaptive regularization for GRAPPA reconstruction,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 248–255, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. F. H. Lin, “Prior-regularized GRAPPA reconstruction,” in Proceedings of the ISMRM 14th Scientific Meeting & Exhibition, p. 3656, Seattle, Wash, USA, May 2006.
  7. D. Huo and D. L. Wilson, “Robust GRAPPA reconstruction and its evaluation with the perceptual difference model,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 1412–1420, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. F. Huang, Y. Li, S. Vijayakumar, S. Hertel, and G. R. Duensing, “High-pass GRAPPA: an image support reduction technique for improved partially parallel imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 642–649, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Zhao and X. Hu, “Iterative GRAPPA (iGRAPPA) for improved parallel imaging reconstruction,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 903–907, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. R. Yang, R. Yang, and G. Huang, “GESPIRiT: ESPIRiT combined with GRAPPA while autocalibration data is insufficient,” in Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Control Automation Robotics & Vision (ICARCV '14), Singapore, December 2014.
  11. Z. Chen, J. Zhang, R. Yang, P. Kellman, L. A. Johnston, and G. F. Egan, “IIR GRAPPA for parallel MR image reconstruction,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 502–509, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. K. V. Fernando and H. Nicholson, “Identification of linear systems with input and output noise: the Koopmans-Levin method,” IEE Proceedings—Control Theory & Applications, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 30–36, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Guillaume, R. Pintelon, and J. Schoukens, “Robust parametric transfer function estimation using complex logarithmic frequency response data,” Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 1180–1190, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  14. P. Stoica, M. Cedervall, and A. Eriksson, “Combined instrumental variable and subspace fitting approach to parameter estimation of noisy input-output systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 43, no. 10, pp. 2386–2397, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  15. W. X. Zheng, “On least-squares identification of stochastic linear systems with noisy input-output data,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 131–143, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  16. O. Söderstrom and P. Stoica, System Identification, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1989.
  17. S. V. Huffle and P. Lemmerling, Total Least Squares and Errors-in-Variables Modeling: Analysis, Algorithms and Applications, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2002.
  18. P. J. Beatty and A. C. Brau, “Understanding the GRAPPA paradox,” in Proceedings of the 14th ISMRM Scientific Meeting, Seattle, Wash, USA, May 2006.
  19. T. Wansbeek and E. Meijer, Measurement error and latent variables in econometrics, vol. 37 of Advanced Textbooks in Economics, North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2000. View at MathSciNet
  20. C. Tofallis, “Model fitting for multiple variables by minimizing the geometric mean deviation,” http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1077322.
  21. C. F. Baum, M. E. Schaffer, and S. Stillman, “Instrumental variables and GMM: estimation and testing,” http://fmwww.bc.edu/ec-p/wp545.pdf.
  22. J. D. Angrist and G. W. Imbens, “Two-stage least squares estimation of average causal effects in models with variable treatment intensity,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 90, no. 430, pp. 431–442, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus