Scientific Evidence of Rice By-Products for Cancer Prevention: Chemopreventive Properties of Waste Products from Rice Milling on Carcinogenesis In Vitro and In Vivo
Cancer is a significant global health concern affecting men and women worldwide. Although current chemopreventive drugs could inhibit the growth of cancer cells, they exert many adverse side effects. Dietary factor plays a crucial role in the management of cancers and has drawn the attention of researchers to be used as an option to combat this disease. Both in vitro and in vivo studies showed that rice and its by-products display encouraging results in the prevention of this disease. The mechanism of anticancer effect is suggested partly through potentiation of bioactive compounds like vitamin E, phytic acid, -aminobutyric acid (GABA), -oryzanol, and phenolics. Nevertheless, the bioactivity of rice and its by-products is still incompletely understood. In this review, we present the findings from a preclinical study both in in vitro and in animal experiments on the promising role of rice by-products with focus on cancer prevention.
Cancer is a significant health concern. One in eight deaths worldwide is due to cancer . It represents the first or second cause of death in advanced countries. Therefore, urgent action is warranted to reduce the threats of this disease, particularly in developing countries in which the prevalence and incidence of this disease are expected to increase. Genetic defects only account for nearly 5–10% of all cancer cases, whereas 90–95% are due to the environment and lifestyle . Therefore, most of the cancer cases and deaths worldwide are actually preventable . It has also been reported that up to 30% of human cancers could be prevented via an appropriate dietary modification .
Carcinogenesis is a complex multistage process comprised of initiation, promotion, and progression stage. Cancer chemoprevention involves the use of natural, synthetic, or biological agents to delay, inhibit, or prevent the initial phases of carcinogenesis, as well as the progression of premalignant cells to invasive disease . In chemoprevention, a vital goal is to block tumor progression . In developed countries, chemopreventive drugs, such as celecoxib and tamoxifen, are being used in high-risk populations; however, due to their adverse side effects, these drugs are not feasible in the developing countries [7–9].
Extensive studies in the past few decades have shown that there are varieties of dietary and botanical natural compounds with chemopreventive properties including garlic, green tea, soy, apple, olive oil, and grape [11–13]. Several recent studies also reported that natural products play a critical role against cancer [14–16]. Identification of bioactive compounds which have medicinal properties from natural products or by-products may promote the nutraceuticals as an inexpensive alternative to anticancer drug therapies which are toxic, immune-suppressive, mutagenic, and even carcinogenic [17, 18]; besides, major treatment modalities include surgery, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy [19–21]. Natural products and their compounds may act as a modulator of antitumorigenicity either as separate entities or by serving in synergism . The combination of two or more components in drug design has also been proven to have clinically synergistic benefits against cancer treatment .
In this review, we present the findings from a preclinical study both in vitro and in vivo on the promising role of rice by-products with focus on cancer perspective.
2. Production of Rice By-Products
High demands of crop production in the world are primarily due to the three key forces which are increasing human population, meat and dairy consumption from growing affluence, and biofuel consumption [24–27]. Thus, global agricultural production is projected to increase by 60–110% by 2050 to meet the increasing demands [26, 28, 29] and provide food security to nearly 870 million chronically undernourished individuals .
Rice areas with doubling yield rates are only observed in several local areas within Afghanistan, India, Bangladesh, Laos, Vietnam, and Cambodia. In contrast, a significant reduction in the rates of rice yield is reported in some parts of India (particularly in Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Tamil Nadu) and in North Korea. Rice provides approximately 30% and 27% as a source of energy in India and China, respectively. The world’s third largest rice producer, Indonesia, produces about 49% of energy, in which the yield improvement rates are slightly lower at 0.4% per year . The production, area harvested, and yield of paddy in several countries are shown in Table 1.
Rice (Oryza sativa) is a staple food of dietary calories for half of the humanity and has been widely demonstrated as a chemopreventive component . The rice milling process is comprised of two basic stages: first is to remove the husk to produce brown rice and the other is to remove the bran layer from brown rice to produce the polished (or white) rice. Additionally, the milling process also separates the germ and some of the endosperm as broken kernels and powdery materials . Therefore, the output of a rice milling process consists of a main product, which is milled rice, and several rice by-products such as the husk, germ, bran layer, and broken kernels . Traditionally, rice is consumed as polished white rice with the removal of husk, bran, and germ fractions , but currently the consumption of brown rice or germinated brown rice is getting popular due to more people becoming aware about their health. The production of rice by-product in rice processing was previously described by Esa et al. . Structure of rice grain is shown in Figure 1.
3. Nutrient Composition and Phytonutrients Properties of Rice By-Products
High intake of whole grain food has been suggested as an indicator of the reduction of risk in several digestive tract neoplasms, such as stomach, colon, and gall bladder . In an earlier study, Deng et al.  studied the health beneficial components in pigmented rice such as flavones, tannins, phenolics, sterols, tocols, -oryzanols, amino acids, -aminobutyric acid (GABA), and essential oils. These compounds have been shown to have a variety of bioactivities including antitumor, antioxidant, antiatherosclerosis, hypoglycemic, and antiallergic activities. The other components in whole grain such as indigestible fibers (Tables 2 and 3), as well as other phytochemicals as illustrated in Tables 4 and 5, have also been considered to contribute to the beneficial effects of whole grain .
Rice bran has been extensively studied among all rice by-products. Besides containing high amounts of vitamins, minerals, and fiber, rice bran also is rich in numerous bioactive components which draw a great deal of attention in the prevention and treatment of several types of human cancers. These bioactive components were reported to have antioxidant activities that can be directly associated with their anticancer effects  including leukemia, breast, lung, liver, cervical, stomach, and colorectal cancers [33, 63]. Studies by Moldenhauer et al. , Renuka Devi and Arumughan , and Canan et al.  further supported the role of a unique complex of naturally antioxidant compounds in rice bran to fight several diseases including cancer.
In addition to the rice bran, more than 1 million tons of rice husks is produced annually in rice processing in South Korea. Rice husk consists of 20% of the rice grain kernel and is nearly similar to other plant biomasses, containing a high proportion of organic substances . Rice husk is inedible, which is utilized in many nonfood applications as low-value agricultural waste product. However, it was reported that rice husk is a valuable source of bioactive compounds that contained a high antioxidant property. Rice husk contained phenolic acids, which are a valuable source of natural antioxidants and prevent the rice seed from oxidative stress . Thus, it has been recognized as a potential source of energy and organic chemicals [76, 77]. Hydrothermal treatments of rice husks also produce lignin-derived components such as caffeic acid and ferulic acid , which are crucial constituents for pharmaceutical application because they provide protection against photooxidative damage . Rice husk has also been reported to have fatty acids, including linoleic, stearic, oleic, and palmitic acids . Phenolic compounds in the methanolic extract of rice husk also displayed a high antioxidant activity against scavengers of singlet oxygen and suppressed high hydrogen peroxide-induced damage against cellular deoxynucleic acid (DNA) in human lymphocytes .
Rice germ is also a by-product from rice processing which is known as embryo or reproductive proportions which germinate and grow into a plant . The amount of vitamin E in rice germ is 5 times higher compared with that of rice bran. Most of the vitamin E in rice germ is α-tocopherol, which is the major active form of vitamin E, while, for rice bran, most of the vitamin E is -tocopherol. Additionally, rice germ also comprised a substantial amount of vitamins (B1, B2, and B6), dietary fiber, and neurotransmitter GABA, which is believed to contain numerous beneficial health effects like improving blood pressure, cognition, and blood glucose levels. The amount of -oryzanol in rice germ, however, was 5 times lower than that of rice bran .
In addition to the rice bran, rice husk, rice straw, and rice germ, brewers’ rice is another by-product in the rice industry that has a significant nutritional value. Brewers’ rice consists of a mixture of broken kernels with rice bran and rice germ, which is usually removed during the rice milling process . Brewers’ rice is typically used as an animal feed and brewing material . The size of brewers’ rice is less than one quarter of the full kernel of milled rice. It is the last and the smallest milling portion that is separated during the milling of paddy rice and is usually removed from larger rice kernels . Brewers’ rice demonstrated high carbohydrate, protein, and fat contents ; minerals such as calcium, phosphorus, iron, sodium, and potassium; fatty acids such as linoleic acid, oleic acid, and palmitic acid. Brewers’ rice also contained a variety of phytochemicals with chemopreventive properties including -oryzanol, phytic acid, vitamin E, phenolic antioxidants , and dietary fiber . Compared with other cereal brans, such as corn, wheat, and oat, the lipid proportion present in brewers’ rice has a unique ratio of vitamin E isoforms (-, -, and -tocopherols and tocotrienols) and γ-oryzanol .
Since phenolic compounds are demonstrated to confer beneficial health benefits, this may partially explain a better nutritional value of rice by-products. Biological activities in the cereal grains were strongly correlated to their polyphenols content , which is known to exhibit potent antioxidant activities [86–88]. Majority of the antioxidants commonly present in fruits, vegetables, and cereals (wheat, rice, and oat) are polyphenolic compounds [89–92]. Li et al.  reported that most of the phenolic acids present in the whole grains are ferulic acid, p-coumaric acid, vanillic acid, caffeic acid, and syringic acid. Others have also reached a similar finding, in which the rice grains were rich in ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid [93, 94]. In view of the total phenolic content in various genotypes of rice by-products, rice brans have 2–11-fold higher content than rice husk, 4–15-fold higher content than brown rice, and 7–59-fold greater content than polished rice .
4. Anticancer Activities of Rice By-Products
4.1. In Vitro Cancer Chemopreventive Study
Colorectal cancer chemoprevention activity highlighted the role of bioactive constituents like rice bran phytic acid , tricin, and flavonoids . Relative proportions of bioactive components in rice bran have been shown to inhibit the growth of colorectal cancer cells; however, they are different among other rice varieties . Kong et al.  reported that rice bran phenolic compound cycloartenyl ferulate inhibited the proliferation of human colorectal adenocarcinoma (SW480) cell line. Chen et al.  used different cancer cell lines to study the cell-inhibiting activity in response to red rice bran extract and demonstrated that red bran exhibited strong inhibitory effects against leukemia, cervical, and stomach cancers. Forster et al.  also reported that total phenolics and -tocotrienol from rice bran exhibited significantly reduced colorectal cancer cell proliferation (). Another rice by-product, momilactone B, an allelochemical of rice hull, has antiproliferative activity against human leukemic T-cells via activation of caspase and mitochondria pathways . In addition to the effects observed in leukemic cancer, methanol extract of rice husk also inhibited the growth of colon cancer cells with inhibition concentration () values of 0.5 μg/mL .
Study on the effect of brewers’ rice on colorectal cancer (HT-29) cell line was conducted by Tan et al. [72, 74]. They reported that water extract of brewers’ rice (WBR) inhibited the proliferation of HT-29 cell line and the effect was suggested to be linked to the bioactive compounds present in WBR. The extract, however, was not cytotoxic against normal cell lines . This finding was consistent with the data obtained by Ryan et al. , Fan et al. , and Kong et al. , who reported that the rice bran components were not cytotoxic against normal cell lines. Summary of in vitro studies on antiproliferative effect of rice by-products is shown in Table 6.
4.2. In Vivo Cancer Chemopreventive Study
Rice germ or the constituents present in the rice bran or germ have been identified to have chemopreventive effects against carcinogenesis in the colon , liver , stomach , esophagus , and bladder  of rodents. Kong et al.  observed that rice bran cycloartenyl ferulate significantly induced suppression of human colorectal adenocarcinoma (SW480) of xenograft in nude mice after 21 days and triggered both death receptor and mitochondrial apoptosis pathways. Similarly, Kim et al.  used pathogen-free female BALB/c mice to evaluate the effect of rice bran -oryzanol on colon tumor growth and found that rice bran -oryzanol could inhibit colon tumor and reduce expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX). In another study, Choi et al.  further demonstrated that feeding a diet containing 10% (w/w) black and brown rice brans reduced VEGF, COX-2, and 5-LOX expression in mouse colon carcinoma cells- (CT-26-) treated mice. Increased COX-2 expression, an inflammatory gene, is positively associated with the inflammatory response strength . Reduction of COX-2 suggests that black and brown rice brans could attenuate the inflammatory response in cancer through reduction of oxidative stress. Interestingly, feeding with rice bran not only reduced the number of aberrant crypt foci (ACF)  but also improved lipid profile as described by Ausman et al.  suggesting the numerous functional potentials of rice bran. Additionally, Kawabata et al.  reported that feeding azoxymethane (AOM) (15 mg/kg body weight once weekly for 3 weeks) with rice germ for 5 weeks significantly suppressed colon adenocarcinoma () in rats. Mori et al.  also observed that the ACF/colon in the rats induced with AOM and fed with rice germ (2.5% in diet) were significantly reduced compared to those of the group with AOM only (). In addition to the effects observed on rice bran and rice germ, using male F344 rats model that received carcinogen 1,2-methylhydrazine (DMH) subcutaneously once weekly for 6 weeks at a dosage of 180 mg/kg body weight, Kim et al. demonstrated that the methanolic extract of rice husk could reduce colon preneoplastic ACF formation by 35% after 40 weeks () . In view of the apoptotic-inducing efficacy observed in HT-29 cell line on water extract of brewers’ rice (WBR), findings from an animal study mirror some of those from preclinical data obtained from an in vitro study. Tan et al.  reported that feeding AOM-induced colon cancer rats (15 mg/kg body weight) with a diet containing 40% brewers’ rice reduced significantly colon tumor multiplicity after 20 weeks of treatment (). The suppressive effects seen in the highest concentration of brewers’ rice treatment could be explained by its higher concentrations of active compounds that may confer better functional properties. However, it is not yet clearly understood which bioactive constituents are responsible for the functional benefits of brewers’ rice, but it is more likely that several of the phytonutrients contribute towards these observed effects. Among the studies described to date, the improvements in these indices could be attributed to higher levels of -oryzanol, phytic acid, vitamin E, and antioxidants . So, it is important to encourage long-term clinical studies to verify these findings by providing a better alternative to curb the rising incidence and prevalence of colon cancer.
Several studies as reported by Henderson et al.  also demonstrated that rice by-products have chemopreventive potential not only in the colon but also in the breast, lung, mouth, bladder, liver, esophagus, and melanoma/skin in vivo. Wang et al.  observed that defatted rice bran sulfated polysaccharide (SRBPS2a) suppressed the implanted EMT-6 breast tumor cells growth in BALB/c mice. In another study, Yasukawa et al.  demonstrated that feeding ICR mice with rice bran cycloartenol ferulate is possible to suppress tumor promotion in 2-stage skin carcinoma. Furthermore, defatted rice germ has also been reported to reduce the incidence of tongue carcinomas and preneoplastic lesions in Fisher 344 rats  (Table 7).
The beneficial effects of bioactive components observed in rice by-products, as reported above, have been postulated by the concept of food synergy . If so, the synergistic/additive effects of bioactive compounds in rice by-products could in the long term be beneficial in the management of cancer via multiple mechanisms perhaps even better than some drugs as suggested by Ricciardiello et al.  who suggested that whole food or whole food extract can have high importance in combating carcinogenesis. These observations also supported the finding by Tsuda et al.  who demonstrated a synergistic and/or additive protective effect of several bioactive compounds.
5. Mechanisms of Action of Rice By-Products as Anticancer Agent
5.1. Apoptosis Induction and Inhibition of Cancer Cellular Proliferation
Apoptosis or programmed cell death plays a crucial role in the tissues maintenance, organ homeostasis, and genetically controlled cell death to balance cell proliferation . Apoptosis is a normal and continuous process in healthy subjects accompanied with complex physiological processes, which controls some of the vital cellular processes like cell turnover, maintaining homeostasis of cell population, development of the immune system, hormone-dependent atrophy, embryonic development, and chemical-induced cell death . Inappropriate regulation of apoptotic cell death mechanism has been identified in numerous human diseases. Thus, aberrant apoptosis contributes to cancer progression. Apoptosis can be stimulated via internal and external stimuli. An internal stimulus can be a p53 tumor suppressor gene, while external stimulus is external plasma membrane associated receptors .
The ability to modulate cell death is identified as a potential therapeutic agent for cancer. Numerous bioactive compounds present in rice bran like ferulic acid , -oryzanol, phytic acid , p-coumaric acid , pectin , tricin, and tocotrienol-tocopherols are believed to be responsible for inducing apoptosis . As shown by Serafim et al. , caffeic and ferulic acid derivatives play a crucial role in the increase of tumor suppressor protein p53 expression and enhance the mitochondrial depolarization and chromatin condensation. In addition to the effects observed on caffeic and ferulic acid, vitamin E, particularly tocotrienols, has also been shown to induce cell cycle arrest , activate p53 and caspase activity [143, 144], inhibit adhesion molecules , suppress nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB) , and downregulate c-Myc and telomerase . Kannappan et al.  further demonstrated that γ-tocotrienol not only has the ability to downregulate the Bcl-2 and Bcl-xL antiapoptotic proteins expression but also induces SHP-1 expression, which directly suppresses the activation of STAT3, as STAT3 pathway correlated well with cancer progression. Furthermore, γ-tocotrienol-induced apoptosis was also demonstrated in Hep3B cells via caspase-3, caspase-8, and caspase-9 activities with the participation of Bax and Bid . Findings by Ahn et al.  further showed that γ-tocotrienol suppressed the NF-κB activation pathway via inhibition of receptor-interacting protein (RIP) and TAK1 and thus suppressed the antiapoptotic gene and contributed to apoptosis. Another vitamin E isomer, δ-tocotrienol, also induced apoptosis in human breast cancer cells through involvement of transforming growth factor-β, Fas, and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling pathways .
In addition to the bioactive compounds mentioned above, β-sitosterol has also been reported to have a beneficial effect against colorectal, stomach, and breast cancers [151, 152]. The possible mechanism is by increasing the damage of the cancer cell membrane, activation of caspase-3 activity , and increasing the production of cellular ceramide, which is related to the cell cycle arrest . Study on the effect of water extract of brewers’ rice (WBR) treatment also resulted in the induction of apoptosis by significant activation of caspase-3 and caspase-8 activities . Momilactone B, an allelochemical extracted from rice husks, was also shown to induce apoptosis in human lymphoma (Jurkat) cells through caspase and mitochondria pathways .
In addition to the prevention of the initiation stage of cancer via the induction of apoptosis, it is also vital for cancer chemopreventive agents to suppress the proliferation of malignant cells. Phytic acid is generally known as an antinutrient compound due to its propensity to form a complex with minerals and subsequently contributed to deficiencies in animal/human. It was also revealed from several in vitro and in vivo studies to have potential in suppressing abnormal cell proliferation [124, 154].
The efficacy of these bioactive compounds as anticancer agents, however, depends on the bioavailability and the dosage . For example, gastrointestinal esterases in the large and small intestines of humans and rats can release diferulic acid from bran fiber, which may promote its bioavailability . In addition, ferulic acid also remains in the bloodstream longer and hence may confer more protection than other known antioxidants. On the other hand, even though phytic acid has been shown to inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells, the absorption in the small intestines of humans is low and relies on plasma concentration [157, 158]. However, several studies suggested that the bioavailability of phytic acid depends on the source of food that it comes from.
5.2. Regulation of Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway
Deregulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling has been demonstrated to be associated with cancer especially with colorectal cancer [159–164]. Cyclin D1 is a well-known cell cycle protein targeted by β-catenin  that is frequently overexpressed in colon tumor tissues . c-Myc is another vital protein in the regulation of cell growth by β-catenin and the Wnt pathway . Leardkamolkarn et al.  reported that methanol extract of Thai rice, Riceberry bran, diminished the amount of cyclin D1 in colonic carcinoma (Caco-2) cell line. In this study, reduction of cyclin D1 observed in colon carcinoma cells, however, was attributed to vitamin E or tocotrienol content . Similarly, Sun et al.  and Gysin et al.  reported that vitamin E or tocotrienol reduced the expression of cyclin D1 in gastric adenocarcinoma and prostate carcinoma. In addition to vitamin E, rice bran phytic acid has also been reported to have a similar effect in diminishing the expression of β-catenin, which could potentially reduce colon carcinogenesis . Inhibition of colon carcinogenesis via modulation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway was also shown in brewers’ rice and its water extract (WBR). As indicated in Figure 2, WBR upregulated mRNA levels of casein kinase 1 (CK1) and adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), a destruction complex involved in the degradation of β-catenin, and inhibited the low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6), which is a crucial coreceptor in Wnt signaling, and glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK3β) mRNA levels . The fact that WBR downregulates GSK3β and produces better colon tumor inhibition suggests that other mechanisms are involved in WBR’s anti-colon cancer properties and are likely modulated by NF-κB [172, 173]. Additionally, brewers’ rice also reduced β-catenin, cyclin D1, and c-Myc expression, as illustrated in Figure 3 . Preclinical findings from in vitro and in vivo studies on mechanisms involved in anti-colon cancer effects suggest that rice by-products could modulate Wnt pathway in colon cancer.
5.3. Modulation of Inflammation Pathway
Numerous bioactive components present in rice by-products have been demonstrated to facilitate cancer chemoprevention through the enhancement of immune response. These cancer chemopreventive immune responses serve either via blocking viral infections related to virus-induced tumors or by specific suppression of tumor cells . The early stages of an inflammatory response are vital in the protection against infection and injury; however, an uncontrolled or chronic inflammatory environment is favorable towards cancer development . Chronic infection and inflammation stimulate the inflammatory-associated genes such as NF-κB  and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression . As reported by Henderson et al. , the whole dietary rice bran modulates the mucosal immune response by increasing the numbers of mesenteric lymph nodes and lamina propria dendritic cells . They also revealed that ferulic acid from rice bran has potential to be a promising cancer chemopreventive agent to inhibit the lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) induced iNOS and COX-2 protein expression as well as suppress the release of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α). This phenomenon was associated with the inhibition of I-κB phosphorylation and subsequently suppression of NF-κB signaling .
An earlier study by Morel et al.  reported the ability of α-tocopherol to promote cytokine production and monocyte recruitment, which are required in the adaptive immunity development. Boxer  and Sakurai et al.  also showed that α-tocopherol and ferulic acid promote the respiratory burst and interferon- production in macrophages, respectively. A previous study by Sierra et al.  also reported the ability of rice bran oil to regulate the immune response by promoting the proliferation of B-cell and inducing interleukin-2 (IL-2) and TNF- production. In addition, rice bran extract MGN-3 has been demonstrated to promote dendritic cell maturation  and enhance cytokine production and natural killer (NK) cell activity .
Feeding mice with diet supplemented with black rice bran extract prior to 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA) administration was also shown to inhibit inflammation (edema) caused by TPA by a marked reduction in proinflammatory cytokines TNF-, interleukin-1 (IL-1), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and eicosanoids leukotriene B4 (LTB4) . Gamma-oryzanol primarily consists of esters of trans-ferulic acid (trans-hydroxycinnamic acid) and phytosterols (sterols and triterpenic alcohols). Cycloartenol, -sitosterol, 24-methylenecycloartenol, and campesterol are present predominantly in -oryzanol [186, 187]. Anti-inflammatory effects of -oryzanol and cycloartenyl trans-ferulate markedly suppressed the inflammatory response in mice-induced colitis . Accordingly, Islam et al.  demonstrated that rice bran phytosteryl ferulates modulated anti-inflammatory reactions via downregulation of inflammatory transcription factor, NF-κB, which may lead to the reduction of inflammatory enzymes like COX-2 and iNOS and proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-. Rice bran phytosteryl ferulates further enhanced blood adiponectin levels through indirect stimulation of peroxisomal proliferator-activated receptor- (PPAR) via suppression of NF-κB. Collectively, rice bran γ-oryzanol inhibited tumor growth via stimulation of cytolytic activity in splenic (NK) cells, partial restoration of nitric oxide production, and phagocytosis in peritoneal macrophages, subsequently resulting in the liberation of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 from macrophages.
MGN-3/biobran, arabinoxylan rice bran, was shown to have antitumor activity, through modulation of immune systems such as NK cells [190–192], TNF-α [184, 193], and macrophages . The investigators found that MGN-3 suppresses tumor in solid Ehrlich carcinoma- (SEC-) bearing mice via induction of apoptosis through its immunomodulatory effects . Additionally, isovitexin from rice husk has also been demonstrated to inhibit release of COX-2 expression and reduced LPS-stimulated prostaglandin E2 . In addition to the effects observed in rice bran and rice husk in the inflammation pathway, brewers’ rice has also been demonstrated to have a similar effect against COX-2 activity. It was shown to reduce COX-2 and NF-κB levels. Findings from animal study also revealed that brewers’ rice upregulated iNOS . This is in agreement with an earlier finding that overexpression of iNOS attenuates the proliferation and metastasis of human renal cell carcinomas and murine fibrosarcoma . In this regard, natural components present in the brewers’ rice such as polyphenolic compounds, including ferulic acid, gallic acid, p-coumaric acid, syringic acid, vanillic acid , and vitamin E isomers, γ-oryzanol , and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)  have the potential to inhibit the proinflammatory immune signaling and subsequently reduce the colon cancer development.
5.4. Protection against Free Radicals and Modulation of Antioxidant Pathway
One of the effective mechanisms for cancer prevention is to inhibit initiation stage through suppression of the DNA damage caused by reactive oxygen species (ROS) or other carcinogens . Oxidative stress can cause significant cellular damage and irreversible mutations; thus, a substantial amount of antioxidant may protect cells from free radical damage.
Study by Tan et al.  showed that dietary administration of brewers’ rice helped to protect against oxidative stress in AOM-induced rat colon carcinogenesis by improved antioxidant capacity like superoxide dismutase (SOD), malondialdehyde (MDA), and nitric oxide (NO). They also observed that brewers’ rice upregulated NF-E2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) signaling pathway via modulation of Nrf2 and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1) transcriptional activities (Figure 3). Earlier study by Tan et al.  also reported that brewers’ rice consists of phenolic antioxidants, phytic acid, vitamin E, oryzanol, and -aminobutyric acid (GABA) which were shown by many previous studies to have a good antioxidant capacity. Ferulic acid, for example, is a well-documented phenolic compound that can be found in high amount in rice by-products, demonstrated to be an effective superoxide anion radical scavenger and lipid peroxidation inhibitor . In another study, ferulic acid has been reported to protect against hydrogen peroxide-induced cellular damage via elevation of cellular levels of HO-1 and heat shock protein-70 . Overall, this suggests that the protective effect of rice by-product on oxidative stress may be mediated partly via the synergistic/additive effects of these bioactive constituents.
Besides bioactive compounds stated above, MGN-3, an arabinoxylan extracted from rice bran, has also been reported to induce oncostatic activity against murine solid Ehrlich carcinoma via modulation of lipid peroxidation and enhanced the endogenous antioxidant scavenging activity such as SOD, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), catalase (CAT), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) .
6. Summary and Future Prospects
This review has provided substantial evidence both in vitro and in vivo that consumption of rice by-products may provide the optimal chemoprevention due to antioxidant phytonutrients. Further clinical studies of rice by-products and their unique bioactive compounds hold great promise in future use as a dietary cancer chemopreventive agent.
In conclusion, rice by-products as a cancer chemopreventive dietary agent represent a unique approach to evaluate effective whole food compared to the individual phytochemical. Our review showed a promising result from both in vitro and in vivo studies, which warrants clinical studies designed to gain a better understanding of the relationship between rice bran/rice husk/rice germ/brewers’ rice and cancers. The global availability and affordability of rice by-products provide a better public health opportunity in both developed and developing countries. Taken together, this review could pave the way for the potential use of rice by-products as a functional food in the prevention and treatment of cancers. The potential implication of the dietary intake of rice by-products in place of conventional treatment modalities could be significant and is warranted to be evaluated further in long-term clinical studies.
The authors declare that there are no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.
K. S. vel Szic, A. Palagani, B. Hassannia et al., “Phytochemicals and cancer chemoprevention: epigenetics friends or foe?” in Phytochemicals- Bioactivities and Impact on Health, InTech, Rijeka, Croatia, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
M. B. Sporn, “Approaches to prevention of epithelial cancer during the preneoplastic period,” Cancer Research, vol. 36, no. 7, part 2, pp. 2699–2702, 1976.View at: Google Scholar
R. D. Verschoyle, P. Greaves, H. Cai, R. E. Edwards, W. P. Steward, and A. J. Gescher, “Evaluation of the cancer chemopreventive efficacy of rice bran in genetic mouse models of breast, prostate and intestinal carcinogenesis,” British Journal of Cancer, vol. 96, no. 2, pp. 248–254, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. G. Vogel, J. P. Costantino, D. L. Wickerham et al., “Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 295, no. 23, pp. 2727–2741, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT), 2014, http://faostat3.fao.org/download/Q/QC/E.
J. W. Jang, C. S. Kay, C. R. You et al., “Simultaneous multitarget irradiation using helical tomotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with multiple extrahepatic metastases,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 412–418, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
FAO, Global Agriculture Towards 2050, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2009.
OECD/FAO, OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2012–2021, OECD Publishing and FAO, 2012.View at: Publisher Site
FAO WFP and IFAD, The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012. Economic Growth is Necessary but not Sufficient to Accelerate Reduction of Hunger and Malnutrition, FAO, Rome, Italy, 2012.
M. C. S. Wopereis, T. Dofoer, P. Indinoba, S. Diack, and M. Dugue, “Curriculum for participatory learning and action research (PLAR) for integrated rice management (IRM) in inland valleys of sub-saharan Africa,” Technical Manual, African Rice Center (WARDA), 2009.View at: Google Scholar
E. T. Champagne, D. F. Wood, B. O. Juliano, and D. B. Bechtel, “The rice grain and its gross composition,” in Rice Chemistry and Technology, pp. 77–107, American Association of Cereal Chemists Press, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
N. M. Esa, T. B. Ling, and L. S. Peng, “By-products of rice processing: an overview of health benefits and applications,” Journal of Rice Research, vol. 1, no. 1, p. 107, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Farrell and K. Hutton, “Rice and rice milling by-products,” in Nontraditional Feed Sources for Use in Swine Production, P. A. Thacker and R. N. Kirkwood, Eds., chapter 24, Butterworths Publishers, Stoneham, Mass, USA, 1990.View at: Google Scholar
NGFA (National Grain & Feed Association), Rice Fractions, NGFA, Grafton, Wis, USA, 2003, http://www.Ingredients101.com/ricefrac.htm.
NRC (National Research Council), United States—Canadian Tables of Feed Composition, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1982.
NRC, Nutrient Requirements of Poultry (Ninth Revised Edition), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
NRC, Nutrient Requirements of Swine, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 10th edition, 1998, http://books.nap.edu/catalog/2114.html.
AgrEvo, “Safety, compositional and nutritional aspects of LibertyLink Rice Transformation events LLRICE06 and LLRICE62,” U.S. FDA/CFSANBNF, 63, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
D. Ffoulkes, “Rice as a livestock feed,” Agnote (Northern Territory of Australia), vol. 273, no. 22, pp. 1–3, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
FAO, Animal Feed Resources Information System. Oryza sativa, 2003, http://www.fao.org/livestock/agap/frg/AFRIS/default.htm.
D. Herd, Composition of Alternative Feeds-Dry Basis, Texas A&M University, College Station, Tex, USA, 2003.
B. O. Juliano and D. B. Bechtel, “The rice grain and its gross composition,” in Rice: Chemistry and Technology, B. O. Juliano, Ed., pp. 17–35, American Association of Cereal Chemists, St. Paul, Minn, USA, 1985.View at: Google Scholar
E. R. Miller, D. E. Ullrey, and A. J. Lewis, Swine Nutrition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, Mass, USA, 1991.
NRC, Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle (Update 2000), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
NRC, Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle (Seventh Revised Edition), National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2001, http://books.nap.edu/catalog/9825.html.
D. J. Drake, G. Nader, and L. Forero, Feeding Rice Straw to Cattle, Publication 8079, University of California's Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Davis, Calif, USA, 2002, http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu.
M. Wanapat, K. Sommart, and K. Saardrak, “Cottonseed meal supplementation of dairy cattle fed rice straw,” Livestock Research for Rural Development, vol. 8, no. 3, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Nour, “Rice straw and rice hulls in feeding ruminants in Egypt,” Department Animal Production, Alexandria U., Alexandria, Egypt, 2003, http://www.ssdairy.org/AdditionalRes/x5494e/x5494e07.htm.View at: Google Scholar
B. L. Tan, N. M. Esa, H. S. Rahman, H. Hamzah, and R. Karim, “Brewers' rice induces apoptosis in azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats via suppression of cell proliferation and the Wnt signaling pathway,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 14, article 304, 2014.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, AOAC, Gaithersburg, Md, USA, 17th edition, 2002.
Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, “Consensus document on compositional considerations for new varieties of rice (Oryza sativa): key food and feed nutrients and anti-nutrients,” in Annual Report 2004, Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Paris, France, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
E. A. Hudson, P. A. Dinh, T. Kokubun, M. S. J. Simmonds, and A. Gescher, “Characterization of potentially chemopreventive phenols in extracts of brown rice that inhibit the growth of human breast and colon cancer cells,” Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1163–1170, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
M.-H. Chen, S. H. Choi, N. Kozukue, H.-J. Kim, and M. Friedman, “Growth-inhibitory effects of pigmented rice bran extracts and three red bran fractions against human cancer cells: relationships with composition and antioxidative activities,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 36, pp. 9151–9161, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. Moldenhauer, E. T. Champagne, D. R. McCaskill, and H. Guraya, “Functional products from rice,” in Functional Foods, G. Mazza, Ed., pp. 71–89, Technomic Publishing, Basel, Switzerland, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
B. L. Tan, M. E. Norhaizan, H. J. Suhaniza, C. C. Lai, S. Norazalina, and K. Roselina, “Antioxidant properties and antiproliferative effect of brewers' rice extract (temukut) on selected cancer cell lines,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2117–2124, 2013.View at: Google Scholar
B. L. Tan, M. E. Norhaizan, S. K. Yeap, and K. Roselina, “Water extract of brewers' rice induces antiproliferation of human colorectal cancer (HT-29) cell lines via the induction of apoptosis,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1022–1029, 2015.View at: Google Scholar
K.-I. Jeon, E. Park, H.-R. Park, Y.-J. Jeon, S.-H. Cha, and S.-C. Lee, “Antioxidant activity of far-infrared radiated rice hull extracts on reactive oxygen species scavenging and oxidative DNA damage in human lymphocytes,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 42–48, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. N. A. M. Nordin, R. Karim, H. M. Ghazali, N. M. Adzahan, and M. T. Sultan, “Effects of various stabilization techniques on the nutritional quality and antioxidant potential of brewer's rice,” Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 347–363, 2014.View at: Google Scholar
J. Glatthar, J. J. Heinisch, and T. Senn, “The use of unmalted triticale in brewing and its effect on wort and beer quality,” Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 182–190, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Awika, L. Dykes, L. Gu, L. W. Rooney, and R. L. Prior, “Processing of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and sorghum products alters procyanidin oligomer and polymer distribution and content,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 18, pp. 5516–5521, 2003.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Norazalina, M. E. Norhaizan, I. Hairuszah, and M. S. Norashareena, “Anticarcinogenic efficacy of phytic acid extracted from rice bran on azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats,” Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 259–268, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. K. L. Kong, W. S. Lam, L. C. M. Chiu, V. E. C. Ooi, S. S. M. Sun, and Y.-S. Wong, “A rice bran polyphenol, cycloartenyl ferulate, elicits apoptosis in human colorectal adenocarcinoma SW480 and sensitizes metastatic SW620 cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 77, no. 9, pp. 1487–1496, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. P. Ryan, A. L. Heuberger, T. L. Weir, B. Barnett, C. D. Broeckling, and J. E. Prenni, “Rice bran fermented with Saccharomyces boulardii generates novel metabolite profiles with bioactivity,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 1862–1870, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kannan, N. Hettiarachchy, M. G. Johnson, and R. Nannapaneni, “Human colon and liver cancer cell proliferation inhibition by peptide hydrolysates derived from heat-stabilized defatted rice bran,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 56, no. 24, pp. 11643–11647, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Punyatong, P. Pongpiachan, P. Pongpiachan, D. Karladee, and S. Mankhetkorn, “Cytotoxicity of crude proanthocyanidin extract from purple glutinous rice bran (Oryza sativa L.) (Kum Doi Saket) compared with cyanidin 3-glucoside on X63 myeloma cancer cell lines,” Kasetsart Journal - Natural Science, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 676–681, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
S. Nurul-Husna, M. E. Norhaizan, I. Hairuszah, M. A. Abdah, S. Norazalina, and I. Norsharina, “Rice bran phytic acid (IP6) induces growth inhibition, cell cycle arrest and apoptosis on human colorectal adenocarcinoma cells,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 4, no. 21, pp. 2283–2289, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
K. Yasukawa, T. Akihisa, Y. Kimura, T. Tamura, and M. Takido, “Inhibitory effect of cycloartenol ferulate, a component of rice bran, on tumor promotion in two-stage carcinogenesis in mouse skin,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 1072–1076, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Mori, K. Kawabata, N. Yoshimi et al., “Chemopreventive effects of ferulic acid on oral and rice germ on large bowel carcinogenesis,” Anticancer Research, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 3775–3778, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
J. Boateng, M. Verghcse, V. Panala, L. T. Walker, and L. Shackelford, “Protective effects of rice bran on chemically induced colon tumorigenesis may be due to synergistic/additive properties of bioactive components,” International Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 153–166, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Panala, M. Verghese, J. Boateng, R. Field, L. Shackelford, and L. T. Walker, “A comparison of rice bran, corn oil and soybean oil against azoxymethane induced colon cancer in a Fisher 344 rat model,” International Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. H. Shafie, N. Mohd Esa, H. Ithnin, A. Md Akim, N. Saad, and A. K. Pandurangan, “Preventive inositol hexaphosphate extracted from rice bran inhibits colorectal cancer through involvement of Wnt/β-catenin and COX-2 pathways,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2013, Article ID 681027, 10 pages, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Katyama, N. Yoshimi, Y. Yamada et al., “Preventive effect of fermented brown rice and rice bran against colon carcinogenesis in male F344 rats,” Oncology Reports, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 817–822, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
M. Katayama, S. Sugie, N. Yoshimi et al., “Preventive effect of fermented brown rice and rice bran on diethylnitrosoamine and phenobarbital-induced hepatocarcinogenesis in male F344 rats,” Oncology Reports, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 875–880, 2003.View at: Google Scholar
H. Tomita, T. Kuno, Y. Yamada et al., “Preventive effect of fermented brown rice and rice bran on N. methyl-N′-nitro.N-nitrosoguanidine-induced gastric carcinogenesis in rats,” Oncology Reports, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 11–15, 2008.View at: Google Scholar
T. Kuno, Y. Hirose, K. Hata et al., “Preventive effect of fermented brown rice and rice bran on N-nitrosomethylbenzylamine-induced esophageal tumorigenesis in rats,” International Journal of Oncology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1809–1815, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
T. Kuno, Y. Hirose, Y. Yamada et al., “Chemoprevention of mouse urinary bladder carcinogenesis by fermented brown rice and rice bran,” Oncology Reports, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 533–538, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
L. M. Ausman, N. Rong, and R. J. Nicolosi, “Hypocholesterolemic effect of physically refined rice bran oil: studies of cholesterol metabolism and early atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemic hamsters,” The Journal of Nutritional Biochemistry, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 521–529, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Janicke, G. Önning, and S. M. Oredsson, “Differential effects of ferulic acid and p-coumaric acid on S phase distribution and length of S phase in the human colonic cell line Caco-2,” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, vol. 53, no. 17, pp. 6658–6665, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shah and P. W. Sylvester, “Tocotrienol-induced caspase-8 activation is unrelated to death receptor apoptotic signaling in neoplastic mammary epithelial cells,” Experimental Biology and Medicine, vol. 229, no. 8, pp. 745–755, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
K. S. Ahn, G. Sethi, K. Krishnan, and B. B. Aggarwal, “γ-Tocotrienol inhibits nuclear factor-κB signaling pathway through inhibition of receptor-interacting protein and TAK1 leading to suppression of antiapoptotic gene products and potentiation of apoptosis,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. 809–820, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Kannappan, V. R. Yadav, and B. B. Aggarwal, “γ-tocotrienol but not γ-tocopherol blocks STAT3 cell signaling pathway through induction of protein-tyrosine phosphatase SHP-1 and sensitizes tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 43, pp. 33520–33528, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M.-C. Shun, W. Yu, A. Gapor et al., “Pro-apoptotic mechanisms of action of a novel vitamin E analog (α-TEA) and a naturally occurring form of vitamin E (δ-Tocotrienol) in MDA-MB-435 human breast cancer cells,” Nutrition and Cancer, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 95–105, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. L. Tan, M. E. Norhaizan, K. Huynh et al., “Water extract of brewers' rice induces apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells via activation of caspase-3 and caspase-8 and downregulates the Wnt/β-catenin downstream signaling pathway in brewers' rice-treated rats with azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 15, article 205, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Norazalina, M. E. Norhaizan, I. Hairuszah, A. R. Sabariah, S. N. Husna, and I. Norsharina, “Antiproliferation and apoptosis induction of phytic acid in hepatocellular carcinoma (HEPG2) cell lines,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 73, pp. 16646–16653, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zhang, L. B. Nanney, C. Luongo et al., “Concurrent overexpression of cyclin D1 and cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (Cdk4) in intestinal adenomas from multiple intestinal neoplasia (min) mice and human familial adenomatous polyposis patients,” Cancer Research, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 169–175, 1997.View at: Google Scholar
R. Gysin, A. Azzi, and T. Visarius, “Gamma-tocopherol inhibits human cancer cell cycle progression and cell proliferation by down-regulation of cyclins,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 16, no. 14, pp. 1952–1954, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
N. Saad, N. M. Esa, and H. Ithnin, “Suppression of β-catenin and cyclooxygenase-2 expression and cell proliferation in azoxymethane-induced colonic cancer in rats by rice bran phytic acid (PA),” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 3093–3099, 2013.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Sakurai, M.-K. Choo, A. Chino et al., “Antimetastatic and immunostimulatory properties of fermented brown rice,” Journal of Traditional Medicine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 112–116, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
M. Ghoneum, “Enhancement of human natural killer cell activity by modified arabinoxylane from rice bran (MGN-3),” International Journal of Immunotherapy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 89–99, 1998.View at: Google Scholar
M. Ghoneum and J. Brown, “NK immunorestoration of cancer patients by MGN-3, a modified arabinoxylan rice bran (study of 32 patients followed for up to 4 years),” in Anti-Aging Medical Therapeutics, R. M. Klatz and R. Goldman, Eds., pp. 217–226, Health Quest Publications, Marina del Rey, Calif, USA, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
M. Ghoneum and A. Jewett, “Production of tumor necrosis factor-α and interferon-γ from human peripheral blood lymphocytes by MGN-3, a modified arabinoxylan from rice bran, and its synergy with interleukin-2 in vitro,” Cancer Detection and Prevention, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 314–324, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
M. Ghoneum and M. Matsuura, “Augmentation of macrophage phagocytosis by modified arabinoxylan rice bran (MGN-3/Biobran),” International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 283–292, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
S.-T. Huang, C.-T. Chen, K.-T. Chieng et al., “Inhibitory effects of a rice hull constituent on tumor necrosis factor α, prostaglandin E2, and cyclooxygenase-2 production in lipopolysaccharide-activated mouse macrophages,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1042, pp. 387–395, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Shi, Q. Xiong, B. Wang, X. Le, N. A. Khan, and K. Xie, “Influence of nitric oxide synthase II gene disruption on tumor growth and metastasis,” Cancer Research, vol. 60, no. 10, pp. 2579–2583, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
B. L. Tan, M. E. Norhaizan, I. Hairuszah, H. Hazilawati, and K. Roselina, “Brewers' rice: a by-product from rice processing provides natural hepatorenal protection in azoxymethane-induced oxidative stress in rats,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2015, Article ID 539798, 10 pages, 2015.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Noaman, N. K. Badr El-Din, M. A. Bibars, A. A. Abou Mossallam, and M. Ghoneum, “Antioxidant potential by arabinoxylan rice bran, MGN-3/biobran, represents a mechanism for its oncostatic effect against murine solid Ehrlich carcinoma,” Cancer Letters, vol. 268, no. 2, pp. 348–359, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar