Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9068647, 5 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9068647
Research Article

The Improvement of Laparoscopic Surgical Skills Obtained by Gynecologists after Ten Years of Clinical Training Can Reduce Peritoneal Adhesion Formation during Laparoscopic Myomectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study

1Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Cagliari Medical School, Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy
2Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari Medical School, Monserrato, 09042 Cagliari, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Valerio Mais; ti.ilacsit@siamv.acenig

Received 7 August 2017; Accepted 27 November 2017; Published 19 December 2017

Academic Editor: Christian Schwentner

Copyright © 2017 Valerio Mais et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Arung, M. Meurisse, and O. Detry, “Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 17, no. 41, pp. 4545–4553, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. V. Mais, “Peritoneal adhesions after laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 20, no. 17, pp. 4917–4925, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Ellis, B. J. Moran, J. N. Thompson et al., “Adhesion-related hospital readmissions after abdominal and pelvic surgery: a retrospective cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 353, no. 9163, pp. 1476–1480, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. E. Beck, M. A. Ferguson, F. G. Opelka, J. W. Fleshman, P. Gervaz, and S. D. Wexner, “Effect of previous surgery on abdominal opening time,” Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1749–1753, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. A. Van Der Krabben, F. R. Dijkstra, M. Nieuwenhuijzen, M. M. P. J. Reijnen, M. Schaapveld, and H. Van Goor, “Morbidity and mortality of inadvertent enterotomy during adhesiotomy,” British Journal of Surgery, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 467–471, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. D. J. Swank, S. C. G. Swank-Bordewijk, W. C. J. Hop et al., “Laparoscopic adhesiolysis in patients with chronic abdominal pain: a blinded randomised controlled multi-centre trial,” The Lancet, vol. 361, no. 9376, p. 2250, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. M. J. Ross, W. R. Welch, and R. E. Scully, “Multiocular peritoneal inclusion cysts (so-called cystic mesotheliomas),” Cancer, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 1336–1346, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. Guerriero, S. Ajossa, V. Mais, M. Angiolucci, A. M. Paoletti, and G. B. Melis, “Role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of peritoneal inclusion cysts,” Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1193–1200, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. K. Rajab, U. N. Ahmad, and E. Kelly, “Implications of late complications from adhesions for preoperative informed consent,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 317–321, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Ellis and A. Crowe, “Medico-legal consequences of post-operative intra-abdominal adhesions,” International Journal of Surgery, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 187–191, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. R. Molinas, M. M. Binda, K. Mailova, and P. R. Koninckx, “The rabbit nephrectomy model for training in laparoscopic surgery,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 185–190, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. R. Molinas, C. R. Cabral, and P. R. Koninckx, “Effect of the diameter of the endoscope and of surgeon training on the duration and quality of laparoscopic surgery in a rabbit model,” Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 447–452, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. J. L. Ordoñez, J. Domínguez, V. Evrard, and P. R. Koninckx, “The effect of training and duration of surgery on adhesion formation in the rabbit model,” Human Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2654–2657, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. R. Molinas, M. M. Binda, R. Campo, and P. R. Koninckx, “Adhesion formation and interanimal variability in a laparoscopic mouse model varies with strains,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 1871–1874, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. R. Corona, J. Verguts, M. M. Binda, C. R. Molinas, R. Schonman, and P. R. Koninckx, “The impact of the learning curve on adhesion formation in a laparoscopic mouse model,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 96, no. 1, pp. 193–197, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. V. Mais, S. Ajossa, B. Piras, S. Guerriero, D. Marongiu, and G. B. Melis, “Prevention of de-novo adhesion formation after laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized trial to evaluate the effectiveness of an oxidized regenerated cellulose absorbable barrier,” Human Reproduction, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 3133–3135, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. V. Mais, G. L. Bracco, P. Litta, T. Gargiulo, and G. B. Melis, “Reduction of postoperative adhesions with an auto-crosslinked hyaluronan gel in gynaecological laparoscopic surgery: a blinded, controlled, randomized, multicentre study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1248–1254, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. L. Mettler and K. Semm, “Pelviscopic uterine surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 23–31, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. E. Carter and S. D. McCarus, “Laparoscopic myomectomy: time and cost analysis of power vs. manual morcellation,” Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 383–388, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. P. Diamond, J. F. Daniell, D. A. Johns et al., “Postoperative adhesion development after operative laparoscopy: Evaluation at early second-look procedures,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 700–705, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. E. B. Wilson, “Probable Inference, the Law of Succession, and Statistical Inference,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 22, no. 158, pp. 209–212, 1927. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. D. M. Rubio, E. E. Schoenbaum, L. S. Lee et al., “Defining translational research: implications for training,” Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 470–475, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J.-B. Dubuisson, A. Fauconnier, C. Chapron, G. Kreiker, and C. Nörgaard, “Second look after laparoscopic myomectomy,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 2102–2106, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. V. Mais, S. Ajossa, S. Guerriero, M. Mascia, E. Solla, and G. B. Melis, “Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome,” American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 174, no. 2, pp. 654–658, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. B. S. Hurst, M. L. Matthews, and P. B. Marshburn, “Laparoscopic myomectomy for symptomatic uterine myomas,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. Pellicano, S. Bramante, D. Cirillo et al., “Effectiveness of autocrosslinked hyaluronic acid gel after laparoscopic myomectomy in infertile patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 441–444, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. J. Kumakiri, I. Kikuchi, M. Kitade et al., “Association between uterine repair at laparoscopic myomectomy and postoperative adhesions,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 331–337, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. G. Trew, G. Pistofidis, G. Pados et al., “Gynaecological endoscopic evaluation of 4% icodextrin solution: a European, multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of the efficacy and safety in the reduction of de novo adhesions after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery,” Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2015–2027, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. A. M. Lower, R. J. S. Hawthorn, D. Clark et al., “Adhesion-related readmissions following gynaecological laparoscopy or laparotomy in Scotland: an epidemiological study of 24 046 patients,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1877–1885, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Trastulli, R. Cirocchi, C. Listorti et al., “Laparoscopic vs open resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. e277–e296, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus