Individual, Social, and Environmental Correlates of Active Transportation Patterns in French Women
Table 4
Adjusted associations between perceived environmental, representation of transportation modes, physical activity, and clusters of physical activity and sedentary behaviors. Results from multinomial logistic regression model using Cluster 5, active transportation as reference (N = 23,222).
Cluster 1
Cluster 2
Cluster 3
Cluster 4
Cluster 6
Active occupation, high sedentary leisure
Sedentary occupation, low leisure
Sedentary transportation
Sedentary occupation and leisure
Active leisure
OR
(CI 99%)
OR
(CI 99%)
OR
(CI 99%)
OR
(CI 99%)
OR
(CI 99%)
Perception of the residential environment (high versus low)
Availability of destinations
0.64
(0.54; 0.77)
0.76
(0.64; 0.90)
0.64
(0.49; 0.82)
0.94
(0.76; 1.16)
0.84
(0.63; 1.12)
Presence of bicycle paths
0.66
(0.56; 0.78)
0.75
(0.64; 0.89)
0.70
(0.53; 0.91)
0.81
(0.66; 1.00)
0.69
(0.51; 0.93)
Perceived pollution
0.74
(0.62; 0.88)
0.82
(0.69; 0.97)
0.77
(0.59; 1.00)
0.95
(0.76; 1.16)
0.68
(0.50; 0.94)
Aesthetics
1.30
(1.08; 1.57)
1.37
(1.08; 1.57)
1.33
(1.00; 1.78)
1.18
(0.95; 1.47)
1.31
(0.93; 1.84)
Positive representation of transportation modes (high versus low)
Walking
0.56
(0.46; 0.68)
0.58
(0.48; 0.69)
0.50
(0.36; 0.69)
0.63
(0.49; 0.79)
0.91
(0.65; 1.26)
Cycling
0.83
(0.69; 0.99)
0.73
(0.61; 0.87)
0.73
(0.56; 0.95)
0.64
(0.52; 0.80)
0.91
(0.67; 1.24)
Individual motorized transportation modes
1.40
(1.18; 1.67)
1.23
(1.04; 1.45)
1.26
(0.98; 1.62)
1.35
(1.10; 1.66)
1.55
(1.17; 2.06)
Public transport
0.91
(0.77; 1.08)
1.03
(0.87; 1.22)
0.77
(0.60; 0.98)
0.99
(0.80; 1.21)
0.83
(0.62; 1.11)
Friends and relatives’ use of active transportation modes (high versus low)
Family’s use of walking/cycling for transportation
0.54
(0.43; 0.66)
0.53
(0.43; 0.65)
0.51
(0.37; 0.68)
0.56
(0.44; 0.72)
0.51
(0.36; 0.73)
Friends’ use of walking/cycling for transportation
0.79
(0.64; 0.96)
0.86
(0.64; 0.96)
0.71
(0.53; 0.96)
0.83
(0.65; 1.06)
0.77
(0.55; 1.09)
Representation of physical activity
Self-representation of being active (yes versus no)
0.74
(0.62; 0.88)
0.50
(0.42; 0.59)
0.64
(0.50; 0.82)
0.32
(0.26; 0.39)
1.23
(0.90; 1.69)
Note. Model adjusted on urban versus rural setting, age, education, and having a child under the age of 13. The following variables were not statistically significant in the adjusted multivariate model: perceived walkability, perception of green spaces, presence of trees, perceived traffic, perceived criminality, perceived cleanliness of the neighborhood, and family representation of physical activity. 185 missing values related to education and age . CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.