Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9191086, 12 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9191086
Research Article

Identification of Multiple Dehalogenase Genes Involved in Tetrachloroethene-to-Ethene Dechlorination in a Dehalococcoides-Dominated Enrichment Culture

1Department of Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan
2Department of Civil Engineering, Nagoya Institute of Technology, Showa, Nagoya 466-8555, Japan
3Department of Civil Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8603, Japan
4Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability (IMaSS), Nagoya University, Chikusa, Nagoya 464-8601, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Naoko Yoshida; pj.ca.hcetin@okoan.adihsoy

Received 30 March 2017; Accepted 3 July 2017; Published 15 August 2017

Academic Editor: Raluca M. Hlihor

Copyright © 2017 Mohamed Ismaeil et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Chloroethenes (CEs) are widespread groundwater toxicants that are reductively dechlorinated to nontoxic ethene (ETH) by members of Dehalococcoides. This study established a Dehalococcoides-dominated enrichment culture (designated “YN3”) that dechlorinates tetrachloroethene (PCE) to ETH with high dechlorination activity, that is, complete dechlorination of 800 μM PCE to ETH within 14 days in the presence of Dehalococcoides species at  copies of 16S rRNA gene/mL. The metagenome of YN3 harbored 18 rdhA genes (designated YN3rdhA1–18) encoding the catalytic subunit of reductive dehalogenase (RdhA), four of which were suggested to be involved in PCE-to-ETH dechlorination based on significant increases in their transcription in response to CE addition. The predicted proteins for two of these four genes, YN3RdhA8 and YN3RdhA16, showed 94% and 97% of amino acid similarity with PceA and VcrA, which are well known to dechlorinate PCE to trichloroethene (TCE) and TCE to ETH, respectively. The other two rdhAs, YN3rdhA6 and YN3rdhA12, which were never proved as rdhA for CEs, showed particularly high transcription upon addition of vinyl chloride (VC), with and mRNA copies per gene, respectively, suggesting their possible functions as novel VC-reductive dehalogenases. Moreover, metagenome data indicated the presence of three coexisting bacterial species, including novel species of the genus Bacteroides, which might promote CE dechlorination by Dehalococcoides.

1. Introduction

Chloroethenes (CEs) such as tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) have been used extensively in dry cleaning and as degreasing agents. Consequently, they are commonly detected in groundwater because of improper disposal and accidental spills. Dehalorespiring bacteria, such as Dehalococcoides, which reductively dechlorinate CEs via respiration [1], have been applied as biocatalysts to remedy environments contaminated with CEs [2]. However, the accumulation of toxic compounds such as cis-dichloroethene (cis-DCE) and vinyl chloride (VC) as incomplete dechlorination products due to the limited distribution of Dehalococcoides, which completely dechlorinate CEs to ethene (ETH), has been reported [2]. To date, only members of the genus Dehalococcoides are known to convert these toxic intermediates to nontoxic ETH [2]. So far, no isolated strain can completely dechlorinate PCE to ETH without accumulation of toxic intermediates in pure culture [3]. Complete dechlorination of PCE to ETH has been rarely demonstrated, even in complexed microbial communities, and the time required for PCE-to-ETH dechlorination in consortia is highly variable, depending on the microbial community and PCE concentration [47]. In general, consortia containing non-dehalorespiring bacteria together with Dehalococcoides show faster dechlorination [8, 9], and several possible functions of non-dehalorespirators in dehalorespiring consortia have been suggested [812].

The ability of Dehalococcoides to partially or completely dechlorinate CEs as well as other organohalides depends largely on reductive dehalogenase (Rdh). Rdhs identified in Dehalococcoides and other dehalorespiring bacteria consist of a catalytic subunit (RdhA) encoded by the rdhA gene and membrane-anchoring protein (RdhB) encoded by rdhB neighboring to rdhA [13, 14]. In addition, several other genes assumed as Rdh-associated genes are frequently located close to rdhA and rdhB and are suggested to be involved in transcription regulation (i.e., rdhS, rdhP, and rdhR), transcription regulation/electron transport (rdhC), or maturation of Rdhs (i.e., rdhF, rdhG, rdhH, and rdhI) [1].

To date, several hundred rdhAs have been sequenced, although specific substrates have been determined for only a few RdhAs that were successfully partially purified from Dehalococcoides; VcrA [15] and BvcA [16] show apparent dechlorination of TCE to ETH and cis-DCE to ETH, respectively, while PceA [17] and TceA [18] can dechlorinate PCE to TCE and TCE to VC, respectively. Besides the CEs-RdhAs that were identified as RdhA for CEs on the basis of enzymatic activity, several RdhAs have been suggested to dechlorinate CEs on the basis of their high sequence similarity to these experimentally proven CE-RdhAs [1921] and high transcription of rdhA specifically induced by CEs [22, 23]. Reverse transcription quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) is a relatively straightforward and promising screening tool for finding novel functions of rdhA from the clear correlation between high transcription levels of known CE-RdhAs and their actual function [23, 24].

In this study, we successfully obtained a consortium containing Dehalococcoides that showed high, complete PCE-to-ETH dechlorination activity, that is, dechlorination of 800 μM PCE to ETH within 14 days. Four rdhAs are suggested to be involved in PCE-to-ETH dechlorination on the basis of their transcription response to CEs. Notably, two out of the four rdhAs had been never proven as rdhA for CEs and, thus, are novel candidate rdhAs involved in CE dechlorination. In addition, metagenome data showed the presence of three coexisting bacterial species, including novel species of the genus Bacteroides, and suggested they might promote CE dechlorination by Dehalococcoides.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Enrichment of Bacteria Dechlorinating CEs

Sediment from Arako River (Nagoya city, Aichi prefecture, Japan) was used as the inoculum for the enrichment of CE-dechlorinating bacteria. Approximately 10 g (wet weight) of the sediment was introduced into 60 mL serum bottles containing 20 mL of distilled water supplemented with 1 mg/L resazurin. The bottles were purged with N2 gas for 15 min and sealed with Teflon-lined rubber stoppers and aluminum crimp caps. The bottles were purged once more with a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4 : 1, v/v) and then supplemented with 20 mM acetate and either PCE (1 mM) or cis-DCE (500 μM) as an e- acceptor and incubated at 28°C. After incubation for 1 month, 100 μL of the headspace gas was analyzed in a gas chromatograph (GC) as described below.

Microcosms showing dechlorination of PCE or cis-DCE were transferred to 20 mL of a mineral medium (DHB-CO3 medium) in a 60 mL serum bottle at a 5% transfer rate. The DHB-CO3 medium included the following components (per liter): 1 g NaCl; 2.5 g NaHCO3; 0.5 g KCl; 0.5 g NH4Cl; 0.1 g CaCl2·2H2O; 0.1 g MgCl2·6H2O; 0.2 g KH2PO4; 1 mL of 1 mg/L resazurin solution; 1 mL of trace element solution SL10 [25]; 10 mL of vitamin solution [26]; 1 mL of Se/W solution [25]; and 10 mL of titanium (III) trinitriloacetic acid solution [27]. The medium was prepared under anaerobic condition with flashing of a mixture of N2 and CO2 (4 : 1, v/v), as described previously [28]. Prior to inoculation, the headspace was exchanged aseptically with a gas mixture of H2 and CO2 (4 : 1, v/v). The transferred cultures were repeatedly incubated and transferred every month after observation of the dechlorination. The cultures supplemented with PCE showed weak dechlorination activity, and therefore, further enrichment was stopped after the third transfer. On the other hand, cultures supplemented with cis-DCE showed stable and complete dechlorination activity. Therefore, only the culture supplemented with cis-DCE was maintained and was designated “YN3.”

Time-course monitoring of the CEs and dechlorinated products in YN3 was carried out in freshly prepared culture (20 mL) inoculated with YN3 from the previous passage (1 mL) and supplemented with either 70 μM PCE or 500 μM cis-DCE in 60 mL serum bottles. To assay the applicability of YN3 for dechlorination of high concentrations of PCE, YN3 grown with 70 μM PCE was additionally spiked with 200–800 μM PCE. A portion of YN3 was periodically withdrawn for monitoring of 16S rRNA gene copy number for total bacteria and specifically, for Dehalococcoides, as described below. To test the ability of YN3 to dechlorinate TCE, trans-DCE, or 1,1-DCE, 200 μM of these compounds was added to cultures.

2.2. Chemical Analysis

CEs and ETH were detected and quantified by gas chromatography (GC), as described previously [36]. In brief, 100 μL of headspace gas was withdrawn using a gastight syringe and injected manually into a GC-2014 (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with flame ionization detector and Porapak Q column (GL Sciences Tokyo, Japan). Nitrogen was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 35 mL/min. The injection, detection, and column temperatures were set at 200°C.

2.3. DNA Extraction

For genomic DNA extraction, cells from YN3 were collected by centrifugation at 15,000 ×g for 15 min and stored at −20°C until DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted as described previously [37].

2.4. Metagenome Sequencing, Sequence Analysis, and Annotation

Extracted DNA was prepared for sequencing by adding Illumina adaptor sequences, using the TruSeq DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina). Metagenome sequencing was carried out using a pair-end run on the Illumina HiSeq platform at Hokkaido System Science Co., Ltd. (Sapporo, Japan). Cutadapt (ver. 1.1 [38]) was used for trimming of the Illumina adaptor sequences and Velvet software (ver. 1.2.08 [39]) was used for sequence assembly. Gene prediction and annotation were carried out using the Microbial Genome Annotation (MiGAP) (ver. 2.19; http://www.migap.org) [40] and Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology (RAST) (ver. 2.0; http://rast.nmpdr.org) pipelines [41]. The contigs obtained from the metagenomic reads were taxonomically classified based on DNA sequence similarity of the entire contigs by NCBI BLASTN (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). In this study, contigs having at least 90% sequence similarity to a known bacterial sequence were classified at the genus level [42, 43]. Contigs showing poor similarity with partial sequences in the known genome were classified based on similarity of the translated sequences of individual genes presenting in the contigs with genes in the published genome by BLASTP. Predicted coding sequences (CDSs) of all contigs were classified into functional categories by matching them to the SEED database provided within the RAST pipeline [44]. The phylogenetic trees of 16S rRNA genes and RdhAs were constructed using MEGA 6 software [45].

2.5. Quantitative PCR (qPCR)

qPCR targeting 16S rRNA genes of Dehalococcoides and the total bacterial population was carried out using the primer sets shown in Table S1 (in Supplementary Material available online at https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9191086) and the FastStart Essential DNA Green Master kit (Roche Diagnostics) on a LightCycler system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), as described previously [46]. The primers were designed using the GenScript Real-Time PCR (TaqMan) Primer Design Tool (https://www.genscript.com/tools/real-time-pcr-tagman-primer-design-tool).

2.6. Reverse Transcription- (RT-) qPCR

mRNA copy numbers of transcribed rdhAs were examined by RT-qPCR in YN3 spiked with CEs, using specific primers (Table S1, supplementary material). The YN3 used for the RT-qPCR experiment was incubated for approximately 30 days to complete the dechlorination of PCE or cis-DCE to ETH, and the headspace gas was exchanged with filter-sterilized N2 to eliminate remaining CEs and ETH. It was then incubated for another 5 days without addition of any CEs as starvation period to attenuate mRNA in the cells. Twenty-milliliter aliquots of starved YN3 were transferred into serum bottles and spiked with PCE (100 μM), TCE (200 μM), cis-DCE (500 μM), or VC (100 μM). An unspiked culture was prepared in parallel as a negative control. After 9–15 h of culture showing dechlorination activity, cells were collected by centrifugation for RNA and DNA extractions. Cell pellets used for RNA extraction were spiked with mRNA of the luciferase-encoding gene (luc) (Promega, Fitchburg, WI, USA) and then subjected to RNA extraction using ISOGEN II (Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan). RT-qPCRs for rdhA and luc quantification were carried out in parallel using the One Step SYBR PrimeScript RT-PCR Kit II (TaKaRa, Otsu, Japan). mRNA copies of rdhA in YN3 were normalized to spiked-in luc mRNA. The RNA recovery rates of the samples in this study varied with total RNA concentration and were in the range of 2–17%. The transcription rate of rdhA was calculated by dividing the mRNA copy numbers by the gene copy numbers determined by qPCR in parallel.

3. Results

3.1. Enrichment of PCE-to-ETH Dechlorinating Culture

A serial transfer culture established from CE-contaminated river sediment, using 1 mM PCE and 500 μM cis-DCE, yielded two enrichment cultures: an unstable PCE-dechlorinating culture and the stable cis-DCE-to-ETH-dechlorinating YN3 (Figure S1, supplementary material). YN3 maintained activity to dechlorinate 500 μM cis-DCE to ETH within 10 days even after 50 transfers over five years. In contrast, the PCE-dechlorinating culture lost its dechlorination activity after the third transfer. Next, YN3 was tested for dechlorination of PCE at a low concentration (70 μM) and showed stable PCE-to-ETH dechlorination activity.

3.2. PCE-to-ETH Dechlorination in YN3

Figure 1(a) shows the changes in PCE and the dechlorination products in YN3 throughout incubation. The culture supplemented with 70 μM PCE started to dechlorinate PCE to TCE at 6 days, reaching a maximum of μM TCE at day 16. The dechlorination of TCE started at day 11, and the main dechlorination products of TCE were ETH together with cis-DCE and VC, indicating the immediate dechlorination of TCE to ETH via cis-DCE and VC in YN3. At day 25, the concentration of ETH reached a maximum (μM) and accounted for 77% of the added PCE. The results clearly demonstrated the ability of YN3 to completely dechlorinate PCE into ETH via TCE, cis-DCE, and VC. A PCE spiking experiment showed that YN3 could dechlorinate 200–800 μM of PCE within 14 days (Figure 1(b)). YN3 also dechlorinated 200 μM 1,1-DCE to ETH via VC within 2 weeks without the accumulation of intermediates; however, it showed no dechlorination activity for trans-DCE.

Figure 1: Reductive dechlorination of PCE to ETH by YN3. (a) Dechlorination of 70 μM PCE in YN3. Error bars represent standard deviations (SDs, ), (b) dechlorination of spiked PCE (200–800 μM) to ETH in YN3 grown with 70 μM PCE. The -axis in panel (b) presents the average number of chlorines on ethylene. Error bars represent SDs ().
3.3. Population of Dehalococcoides and Non-Dehalorespiring Bacteria in the YN3 Metagenome

The metagenome of YN3 indicated the presence of the single known dehalorespiring species, Dehalococcoides, in the enrichment culture. The 16S rRNA gene designated as phylotype YN3-01 of the genus Dehalococcoides was identical to the 16S rRNA genes of D. mccartyi strains CG5, IBARAKI, CBDB1, and DCMB5 in the Pinellas subgroup of Dehalococcoides (Figure S2, supplementary material), one of the three subgroups of Dehalococcoides proposed by Hendrickson et al. [47]. The 16S rRNA gene of the phylotype YN3-01 was identical to the 16S rRNA genes of strains CG5, CBDB1, IBARAKI, and DCMB5. Strains CBDB1, CG5, and DCMB5 can dechlorinate PCE to TCE or DCE but not DCE and VC [3, 24, 48]. The partial inconsistency between the phylogeny of the 16S rRNA gene and the dechlorination spectrum observed in this study can be explained in two ways: multiple strains of Dehalococcoides are present in YN3 or rdhAs for cis-DCE and VC were horizontally acquired independently of the core genes [49, 50].

To confirm PCE-to-ETH dechlorination by Dehalococcoides in YN3, the Dehalococcoides population was monitored by 16S rRNA gene-based qPCR analysis. Figure 2 shows the qPCR data for YN3 dechlorinating 70 μM PCE (Figure 1(a)) based on 16S rRNA primers specific for Dehalococcoides and total bacteria. YN3 contained  copies of the Dehalococcoides 16S rRNA gene/mL of culture at day 0, which increased to  copies/mL at day 21, at which PCE was completely dechlorinated to ETH. Meanwhile, the total bacterial population in YN3 showed  copies/mL at day 0, which increased to  copies/mL at day 21. Throughout the incubation, Dehalococcoides species comprised 15–28% of the total bacterial population. Similar growth trends were observed for Dehalococcoides and total bacteria in YN3 dechlorinating cis-DCE, in which Dehalococcoides accounted for 31–45% of the total bacteria (Figure S3, supplementary material). Bacteroides species, non-dehalorespiring bacteria that existed together with Dehalococcoides species in YN3, reportedly have five 16S rRNA gene copies [51], while Dehalococcoides spp. harbor a single copy [49, 52], suggesting that the Dehalococcoides population in YN3 was potentially underestimated. YN3 spiked with 200–800 μM PCE showed increasing Dehalococcoides copy numbers, as summarized in Table S2 (supplementary material), indicating their dehalorespiring growth at higher concentrations of PCE.

Figure 2: Changes in the population of Dehalococcoides and total bacteria in YN3. Error bars represent SDs ().
3.4. Dehalococcoides Metagenome

Sixty-five contigs (1.3 Mbp in total) in the YN3 metagenome were assigned to Dehalococcoides. The total size and number of CDSs of the Dehalococcoides metagenome from YN3 are similar to those of the other known Dehalococcoides isolates (Table S3, supplementary material). Forty-eight out of 65 contigs (104–202,438 bp in length) showed 92–100% similarity to the genomes of D. mccartyi strains DCMB5 and CG5, which are isolates belonging to the Pinellas subgroup. The other 17 contigs (129–2,468 bp in length) showed 91–99% similarity to the partial genome sequences of D. mccartyi strain VS in the Victoria subgroup. Owing to limited sequencing data, we were not able to deduce whether all of the Dehalococcoides contigs were derived from a single strain or from multiple strains.

The Dehalococcoides metagenome was compared to the genomes of strains CG5, CBDB1, and DCMB5, which are the nearest strains according to the above 16S rRNA gene analysis (Figure 3(a)). The genome size (1.34 Mbp) and CDS number (1420) in the Dehalococcoides metagenome in YN3 were slightly lower than those of the closest strains, which are 1.39–1.43 Mbp, containing 1413–1477 CDSs. The functional distributions of the genes from the Dehalococcoides metagenome and the related strains were very similar, except for minor variation in some categories.

Figure 3: Functional distribution of genes in the YN3 metagenome. (a) Dehalococcoides metagenome in YN3 (Dhc-YN3) and Dehalococcoides strains CG5, CBDB1, and DCMB5, (b) Bacteroidetes metagenome in YN3 (Bact-YN3) and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482, (c) Actinobacteria metagenome in YN3 (Act-YN3) and Microlunatus phosphovorus NM-1, and (d) Firmicutes metagenome in YN3 (Firm-YN3).
3.5. Non-Dehalococcoides Metagenome

Genomic fragments of non-Dehalococcoides bacteria in YN3 were affiliated to not only Bacteroidetes, but also the phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes. In their metagenomes, rpoB, encoding the β-subunit of RNA polymerase, and the 16S rRNA gene revealed the presence of strains closely related to Microlunatus phosphovorus NM-1 of the phylum Actinobacteria (86% of rpoB similarity) and Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron VPI-5482 of the phylum Bacteroidetes (97% of 16S rRNA gene similarity). Unfortunately, we were unable to compare the Firmicutes metagenome with isolated genomes because of low read numbers and lack of the 16S rRNA or rpoB gene in this metagenome (Figure 3(d)).

The Bacteroidetes/Actinobacteria metagenomes had smaller genome sizes and lower total gene numbers than the phylogenetically closest strains (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). This suggests insufficient sequencing depth to complete the genomes of all members in YN3. In contrast to the overall trend, the Actinobacteria metagenome had 7–19 more genes in the functional categories “motility and chemotaxis” and “miscellaneous,” and the Bacteroidetes metagenome had up to 10 genes more in the categories “dormancy and sporulation,” “secondary metabolism,” “protein metabolism,” “motility and chemotaxis,” and “miscellaneous.” Actinobacteria/Bacteroidetes members with those particular functions are potentially selectively cultivated under dehalorespiration by Dehalococcoides.

3.6. Reductive Dehalogenase and Associated Genes

Eighteen pairs of rdhA and rdhB, encoding the catalytic unit and membrane anchor protein of Rdh, respectively, were detected in the Dehalococcoides metagenome (Figure 4). Most of the predicted RdhA proteins had three conserved motifs of twin-arginine translocation (TAT) leader sequence at the N-terminus and two iron-sulfur-binding motifs near the C-terminus [13], with only YN3RdhA10 lacking the TAT sequence. Most rdhAB pairs in the YN3 metagenome were detected with genes of transcription regulators (rdhS/P and rdhR), suggesting their involvement specific to each rdhA. Other associated genes involved in assembling and maturation of RdhA (rdhF, rdhG, rdhH, and rdhI) were a minority in the YN3 metagenome, as reported for other isolates of Dehalococcoides spp. Surprisingly, rdhA encoded in gene clusters lacking those accessory genes is expressed as an active, mature RdhA, as indicated by a previous study [50], which suggests a possible association of these accessory proteins remotely encoded in the genome to multiple RdhAs.

Figure 4: Gene clusters containing reductive dehalogenases in the Dehalococcoides metagenome. The predicted encoded proteins for all genes have been described previously [1] and are as follows: rdhA: catalytic subunit of Rdh, rdhB: membrane anchor protein of Rdh, rdhC: protein that has a putative function in regulation or electron transport, rdhS and rdhP: sensor histidine kinase and response regulator of the two-component regulatory system, respectively, rdhSP: hybrid rdhS and rdhP, rdhR: multiple resistance regulator (MarR) regulator, rdhF: corrinoid-synthetizing protein, rdhG: Rdh-modifying proteolytic protein, rdhH: hypothetical protein of unknown function, and rdhI: corrinoid-modifying protein.

Among the 18 RdhAs in YN3, only YN3RdhA8 and YN3RdhA16 showed significant similarity to the previously experimentally proven CE-dechlorinating RdhAs (Table S4, supplementary material). YN3RdhA8 had 94% amino acid identity with PceA of strain 195, which dechlorinates PCE to TCE [17]. In the phylogenetic tree (Figure 5), YN3RdhA8 formed a cluster with PceA of strain 195 and several RdhAs from PCE-dehalorespiring strains (195, CBDB1, CG1, and BTF08) and non-PCE-dehalorespiring strains VS [53], UCH007 [20], and IBARAKI [21]. YN3RdhA16 showed 97% amino acid similarity with VcrA of strain VS, an RdhA that can dechlorinate cis-DCE and VC, and TCE with lower activity [15]. In the phylogenetic tree, YN3RdhA16 clustered with VcrA and RdhAs from cis-DCE-to-ETH-dehalorespiring strains UCH007 [20] and IBARAKI [21] and PCE-to-ETH-dechlorinating strain BTF08 [5].

Figure 5: Neighbor-joining tree of RdhAs detected in the YN3–Dehalococcoides metagenome. The tree shows the phylogeny of RdhAs detected in YN3–Dehalococcoides-metagenome (inside boxes) and other RdhAs from Dehalococcoides and non-Dehalococcoides dehalorespiring bacteria. Red, blue, and green solid circles indicate RdhAs in the Pinellas, Cornell, and Victoria subgroups of genus Dehalococcoides, respectively, while violet indicates those of non-Dehalococcoides dehalorespirators. Superscript numbers 1–14 indicate biochemically characterized RdhAs and their substrate(s) as follows: 1PceA (AAW40342): RdhA for PCE [17]; 2TceA (AAW39060): RdhA for TCE, cis-DCE, 1,1-DCE, 1,2-DCA, and 1,2-dibromoethane [18]; 3BvcA (ABQ17429): RdhA for cis-DCE, trans-DCE, 1,1-DCE, 1,2-DCA, and VC [16, 22]; 4VcrA (AAQ94119): RdhA for TCE, cis-DCE, trans-DCE, 1,1-DCE, and VC [15]; 5CbrA (CAI82345): RdhA for 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,3-tetrachlorobenzene and pentachlorobenzene [29]; 6PcbA4 (WP_041340852): RdhA for PCB and PCE [24]; 7PcbA5 (AII60305): RdhA for PCB and PCE [24]; 8PcbA1 (AII58466): RdhA for PCB and PCE [24]; 9DcaA (CAJ75430): RdhA for 1,2-DCA [30]; 10PceA (CAD28790): RdhA for PCE and TCE [31]; 11CprA (AAQ54585): RdhA for 3,5-dichlorophenol, 2,3,5-trichlorophenol, PCP, 2,3,4,5-tetrachlorophenol, 3,4,5-trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-trichlorophenol, and 2,4-dichlorophenol [32]; 12PceA (AAC60788): RdhA for PCE and TCE [33]; 13CfrA (AFQ20272): RdhA for 1,1,1-trichloroethane and chloroform [34]; 14CprA (AAG49543): RdhA for orthochlorophenols [35].
3.7. Transcription of rdhA in Response to CEs

To identify the rdhAs involved in the PCE-to-ETH dechlorination in YN3, RT-qPCR targeting mRNA of all 18 rdhAs was conducted. The rdhAs showing a higher than twofold increase in transcription after spiking of CEs as compared to without spiking by single determination were screened as candidate rdhAs for CEs. A first RT-qPCR screening of YN3 grown with cis-DCE (Table S5, supplementary material) provided three candidate CEs-responsive rdhAs, that is, YN3rdhA6, YN3rdhA12, and YN3rdhA16. Unexpectedly, YN3rdhA8, closely related to pceA of a known PCE-Rdh, was not transcribed at a significant level, although the starved YN3 spiked with PCE produced TCE.

Next, the transcription of three rdhAs significantly responsive to CE-spiking and YN3rdhA8 was confirmed in at least triplicate determinations. YN3rdhA6, YN3rdhA12, and YN3rdhA16 were confirmed to significantly respond to some of the CEs (Figure 6), while no significant transcription of YN3rdhA8 was detected. Specifically, YN3rdhA6 mRNA was greatly increased by spiking of VC ( mRNA copies per gene; Figure 6(a)) and slightly increased by spiking with cis-DCE, TCE, and PCE. YN3rdhA12 responded especially to VC spiking ( mRNA copies per gene) and showed a slight response to all other CEs (Figure 6(b)). YN3rdhA16, an rdhA closely related to vcrA, showed increased transcription in response to VC ( mRNA copies per gene), cis-DCE ( mRNA copies per gene), and TCE ( mRNA copies per gene) (Figure 6(c)). In this experiment, two rdhAs (YN3rdhA6 and YN3rdhA12) that had been never previously identified as rdhAs for CEs unexpectedly showed much stronger transcription than the two rdhAs corresponding to known CE-RdhAs, that is, YN3rdhA16 (vcrA) and YN3rdhA8 (pceA).

Figure 6: Transcription analysis of YN3rdhA6 (a), YN3rdhA12 (b), YN3rdhA16 (c), and YN3rdhA8 (d) in YN3 spiked with PCE, TCE, cis-DCE, or VC. Error bars represent SDs (). Inserted figures in panels (a) and (b) are enlarged figures. Blue and red represent the transcription of rdhA in YN3 grown with cis-DCE and PCE, respectively.

The observed marginal increases in YN3rdhA6 and YN3rdhA12 mRNA after spiking of PCE and no significant increase in YN3rdhA8 (pceA) transcription motivated us to reexamine the transcription by using YN3 grown with PCE. YN3 grown with PCE was starved similar to the above transcription analysis and then spiked with PCE. As a result, an increase in transcription was observed especially for YN3rdhA8 (pceA), with mRNA copies per gene (Table S5 (supplementary material) and Figure 6(d)).

Overall, the results suggested the involvement of four rdhAs in different steps of PCE-to-ETH dechlorination. YN3rdhA8 (pceA) is seemingly involved in PCE-to-TCE dechlorination, especially under PCE-growing condition. Subsequently, YN3rdhA16 (vcrA) is transcribed to respond to the produced TCE and is involved in the dechlorination of TCE to ETH. Besides these known rdhAs, YN3rdhA6 and YN3rdhA12 were found to be transcribed in the presence of VC and are likely involved in VC dechlorination.

4. Discussion

In this study, we successfully obtained a Dehalococcoides-dominated PCE-to-ETH-dechlorinating culture, YN3, and revealed that four rdhAs are involved in the PCE-to-ETH dechlorination. Particularly, we identified a novel candidate rdhA, YN3rdhA6, encoding an RdhA that probably dechlorinates VC, on the basis of its higher transcription than that of other rdhAs in response to VC.

To date, only two rdhAs encoding RdhAs that dechlorinate VC to ETH, that is, vcrA and bvcA, have been identified by enzymatic assays [15, 16]. vcrA was originally identified via amino acid sequencing of the partially purified VcrA [15], while bvcA was first suggested as a candidate VC RdhA on the basis of its increased transcription in response to VC [22], and BvcA was recently proven to dechlorinate VC by native gel assay [16]. Both vcrA and bvcA have been applied as authentic biomarkers to estimate VC dechlorination activity in bioremediation sites [2]. This study suggests the potential presence of multiple VC-reductive dehalogenases in Dehalococcoides and an additional VC-reductive dehalogenase-encoding gene, YN3rdhA6, far related to vcrA and bvcA, with 31% translated amino acid similarity. However, some Dehalococcoides, either in pure form or in consortia, have rdhAs identical or similar (>94% of the translated similarity) to YN3rdhA6 but are unable to dechlorinate VC (Tables S4 and S6, supplementary material). This contradictory finding might indicate that YN3rdhA6 responds to VC at the transcriptional level but is not involved in the dechlorination. Additional experiments, including enzymatic assays, are required to further assess whether YN3rdhA6 encodes a VC-reductive dehalogenase.

The sequences of YN3rdhA6 and its gene cluster are not unique but are highly conserved in strains of Dehalococcoides (Figure S4A, supplementary material). However, the substantial transcriptional response of YN3rdhA6-related genes to VC has been missed in previous studies because they generally focused on responses of this gene to PCE [24] (Table S6, supplementary material). The difference in magnitude of the transcriptional response between YN3rdhA6 and other rdhAs can be attributed to a particular transcription regulator, the hybrid protein (rdhSP) of sensor histidine kinase (rdhS) and response regulator (rdhP) of the two-component regulatory system (Figure 4 and Figure S4 (supplementary material)). In the metagenome of Dehalococcoides in YN3, another transcription regulator, multiple resistance regulator (MarR) regulator (rdhR), and a gene set of rdhS and rdhP are frequently observed in multiple Rdh-associated gene clusters and are suggested to function in the transcription regulation of rdhAs. The hybrid protein rdhSP is particularly detected in only two gene clusters, one of which includes YN3rdhA6.

Another rdhA that particularly responded to VC spiking, YN3rdhA12, is a possible candidate rdhA that dechlorinates VC. The gene cluster harboring the gene is conserved in YN3 and Dehalococcoides (Figure S4B, supplementary material). The transcription of rdhA identical to YN3rdhA12 has been studied in strain CG5 [24] and a PCE-dechlorinating enrichment culture TUT2264 [54] (Table S6, supplementary material). The YN3rdhA12-related rdhA of CG5 showed lower transcription than other rdhAs in culture, and consequently, this gene has been never focused on as an rdhA for CEs in this strain [24]. On the other hand, three YN3rdhA12-related rdhAs of TUT2264 showed remarkable (>20-fold) increases in transcription in response to spiking of CEs [54]. However, the specific CE affecting transcription was different among YN3rdhA12 and the three rdhAs in TUT2264. Specifically, like YN3rdhA12, one of the YN3rdhA12-related rdhAs of TUT2264 was increasingly transcribed by addition of VC, while the two other genes were particularly transcribed in the presence of other CEs, but not VC. These results indicated that YN3rdhA12 and related rdhAs can be suggested as rdhAs for CEs, although further study is required to identify specifically which CEs can be dechlorinated by the rdhAs.

The PCE-to-ETH dechlorination rate in YN3 seemed to be comparatively higher than those previously reported in other PCE-to-ETH-dechlorinating enrichment cultures. The KB-1/PCE culture was reported to dechlorinate 100–300 μM of spiked PCE to ETH within two weeks with the involvement of Dehalococcoides and Geobacter as dechlorinators [4]; BTF08, a highly enriched culture containing Dehalococcoides as a single dehalorespirator, dechlorinated approximately 500 μM PCE to ETH in approximately 100 days [5]; AMEC-4P culture dechlorinated 2 mM PCE to ETH within 143 days, also with Dehalococcoides and Geobacter as dechlorinators [6]. Although the dechlorination rates of those microbial communities are variable depending on the culture conditions, YN3 can be suggested as a promising consortium for application in the bioaugmentation of environments contaminated with CEs.

In contrast to the relatively higher dechlorinating activity in YN3, metagenome analysis of YN3 indicated no apparent uniqueness in the genome of Dehalococcoides in this culture. Specifically, Dehalococcoides in YN3 showed 16S rRNA gene sequences identical to those of strains CG5, CBDB1, IBARAKI, and DCMB5 (Figure S2, supplementary material) in the Pinellas subgroup of Dehalococcoides. Moreover, all the predicted RdhAs detected in YN3 showed 98–100% similarity with some of the RdhAs in those strains (Table S4, supplementary material). Therefore, we suggest that the high dechlorination activity in YN3 is attributable to other mechanisms.

A plausible explanation for the high dechlorination activity of YN3 is the constitution of its microbial community. The metagenomic analysis indicated the coexistence of members of the phyla Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. Particularly, a 16S rRNA gene-based phylotype of Bacteroides might be a new species of Bacteroides, on the basis of the 16S rRNA gene similarity (97%) with known strains. Additionally, members of Bacteroides have been frequently detected in dehalorespiring cultures together with Dehalococcoides [11, 55, 56]. To date, coexisting bacteria belonging to diverse bacterial phyla have been reported to support Dehalococcoides by supplementation of growth factors [8, 9], removal of toxic substances [12], and scavenging the harmful oxygen [57]. Considering the variety in function and phylogeny of non-dechlorinating bacteria that support dechlorination, the non-dechlorinating bacteria in YN3 also possibly contribute to enhancing the dechlorination activity of YN3. Additional experiments will be necessary to prove their contribution to dechlorination by YN3.

5. Conclusion

A Dehalococcoides-dominated enrichment culture, YN3, was newly established from a CE-contaminated river sediment and efficiently dechlorinated 800 μM PCE to ETH within 14 days. The high dechlorination rate was attributed to the presence of non-dehalorespiring bacteria of phyla Actinobacteria and Firmicutes and a new species of the phylum Bacteroidetes. Transcription analysis suggested the involvement of four rdhAs in the PCE-to-ETH dechlorination in YN3. Among these four rdhAs, two were closely related to well-known rdhAs involved in the dechlorination of CEs, pceA, and vcrA. The other two rdhAs, YN3rdhA6 and YN3rdhA12, can be novel candidate rdhAs encoding VC-reductive dehalogenases, on the basis of their significant increase in transcription in response to VC.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by JSPS KAKENHI (15K12237, 26281040) and supported by the joint usage/research program of the Institute of Materials and Systems for Sustainability (IMaSS), Nagoya University, Japan. The authors thank Dr. Bin Zhao (Chinese Academy of Sciences), Dr. Mamoru Oshiki (Nagaoka National College of Technology), Dr. Natsuko Hamamura (Kyushu University), and Dr. Shujiro Okuda (Niigata University) for helpful discussion. They also thank Mrs. Tomomi Suzuki (Nitech) and Mrs. Sachiko Nakagawa for the kind technical assistance and the staff of Nagoya City Bureau of Environment for the help with the sediment sampling.

References

  1. L. Adrian and F. E. Löffler, Organohalide-Respiring Bacteria, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1st edition, 2016.
  2. H. F. Stroo, A. Leeson, and C. H. Ward, Bioaugmentation for Groundwater Remediation, vol. 2013 edition, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. F. E. Löffler, J. Yan, K. M. Ritalahti et al., “Dehalococcoides mccartyi gen. nov., sp. nov., obligately organohalide-respiring anaerobic bacteria relevant to halogen cycling and bioremediation, belong to a novel bacterial class, Dehalococcoidia classis nov., order Dehalococcoidales ord. nov. and family Dehalococcoidaceae fam. nov., within the phylum Chloroflexi,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 625–635, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Duhamel, S. D. Wehr, L. Yu et al., “Comparison of anaerobic dechlorinating enrichment cultures maintained on tetrachloroethene, trichloroethene, cis-dichloroethene and vinyl chloride,” Water Research, vol. 36, no. 17, pp. 4193–4202, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. Cichocka, M. Nikolausz, P. J. Haest, and I. Nijenhuis, “Tetrachloroethene conversion to ethene by a Dehalococcoides-containing enrichment culture from Bitterfeld,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 297–310, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B.-H. Kim, K.-H. Baek, D.-H. Cho et al., “Complete reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethene to ethene by anaerobic microbial enrichment culture developed from sediment,” Biotechnology Letters, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1829–1835, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J. Lee and T. K. Lee, “Development and characterization of PCE-to-ethene dechlorinating microcosms with contaminated river sediment,” Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 120–129, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. He, V. F. Holmes, P. K. H. Lee, and L. Alvarez-Cohen, “Influence of vitamin B12 and cocultures on the growth of Dehalococcoides isolates in defined medium,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 2847–2853, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. Y. Men, H. Feil, N. C. Verberkmoes et al., “Sustainable syntrophic growth of Dehalococcoides ethenogenes strain 195 with desulfovibrio vulgaris hildenborough and methanobacterium congolense: global transcriptomic and proteomic analyses,” ISME Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 410–421, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. D. Distefano, J. M. Gossett, and S. H. Zinder, “Hydrogen as an eectron-donor for dechlorination of tetrachloroethene by ananaerobic mixed culture,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 58, no. 11, pp. 3622–3629, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  11. T. Miura, A. Yamazoe, M. Ito et al., “The impact of injections of different nutrients on the bacterial community and its dechlorination activity in chloroethene-contaminated groundwater,” Microbes and Environments, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 164–171, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W.-Q. Zhuang, S. Yi, M. Bill et al., “Incomplete Wood-Ljungdahl pathway facilitates one-carbon metabolism in organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoides mccartyi,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 17, pp. 6419–6424, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Futagami, M. Goto, and K. Furukawa, “Biochemical and genetic bases of dehalorespiration,” Chemical Record, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. L. A. Hug, F. Maphosa, D. Leys et al., “Overview of organohalide-respiring bacteria and a proposal for a classification system for reductive dehalogenases.,” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, vol. 368, no. 1616, p. 20120322, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. A. Müller, B. M. Rosner, G. Von Abendroth, G. Meshulam-Simon, P. L. McCarty, and A. M. Spormann, “Molecular identification of the catabolic vinyl chloride reductase from Dehalococcoides sp. strain VS and its environmental distribution,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 4880–4888, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. S. Tang, W. W. M. Chan, K. E. Fletcher et al., “Functional characterization of reductive dehalogenases by using blue native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 974–981, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J. K. Magnuson, R. V. Stern, J. M. Gossett, S. H. Zinder, and D. R. Burris, “Reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethene to ethene by a two- component enzyme pathway,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1270–1275, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. K. Magnuson, M. F. Romine, D. R. Burris, and M. T. Kingsley, “Trichloroethene reductive dehalogenase from Dehalococcoides ethenogenes: sequence of tceA and substrate range characterization,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 5141–5147, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Pöritz, T. Goris, T. Wubet et al., “Genome sequences of two dehalogenation specialists - Dehalococcoides mccartyi strains BTF08 and DCMB5 enriched from the highly polluted Bitterfeld region,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 343, no. 2, pp. 101–104, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. Y. Uchino, T. Miura, A. Hosoyama et al., “Complete genome sequencing of Dehalococcoides sp. strain UCH007 using a differential reads picking method,” Standards in Genomic Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, article no. 102, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. Yohda, O. Yagi, A. Takechi et al., “Genome sequence determination and metagenomic characterization of a Dehalococcoides mixed culture grown on cis-1,2-dichloroethene,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 69–77, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. R. Krajmalnik-Brown, T. Hölscher, I. N. Thomson, F. M. Saunders, K. M. Ritalahti, and F. E. Löffler, “Genetic identification of a putative vinyl chloride reductase in Dehalococcoides sp. strain BAV1,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 6347–6351, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. W. L. Chow, D. Cheng, S. Wang, and J. He, “Identification and transcriptional analysis of trans-DCE-producing reductive dehalogenases in Dehalococcoides species,” ISME Journal, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 1020–1030, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. Wang, K. R. Chng, A. Wilm et al., “Genomic characterization of three unique Dehalococcoides that respire on persistent polychlorinated biphenyls,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 33, pp. 12103–12108, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. F. Widdel, G.-W. Kohring, and F. Mayer, “Studies on dissimilatory sulfate-reducing bacteria that decompose fatty acids - III. Characterization of the filamentous gliding Desulfonema limicola gen. nov. sp. nov., and Desulfonema magnum sp. nov,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 134, no. 4, pp. 286–294, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. C. Holliger, D. Hahn, H. Harmsen et al., “Dehalobacter restrictus gen. nov. and sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium that reductively dechlorinates tetra- and trichloroethene in an anaerobic respiration,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 313–321, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. T. Moench and J. G. Zeikus, “An improved preparation method for a titanium (III) media reductant,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 199–202, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. R. Lovley and E. J. P. Phillips, “Organic matter mineralization with reduction of ferric iron in anaerobic sediments,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 683–689, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  29. L. Adrian, J. Rahnenführer, J. Gobom, and T. Hölscher, “Identification of a chlorobenzene reductive dehalogenase in Dehalococcoides sp. strain CBDB1,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 23, pp. 7717–7724, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Marzorati, F. de Ferra, H. van Raemdonck et al., “A novel reductive dehalogenase, identified in a contaminated groundwater enrichment culture and in Desulfitobacterium dichloroeliminans strain DCA1, is linked to dehalogenation of 1,2-dichloroethane,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 73, no. 9, pp. 2990–2999, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Maillard, W. Schumacher, F. Vazquez, C. Regeard, W. R. Hagen, and C. Holliger, “Characterization of the corrinoid iron-sulfur protein tetrachloroethene reductive dehalogenase of Dehalobacter restrictus,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 4628–4638, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Bisaillon, R. Beaudet, F. Lépine, E. Déziel, and R. Villemur, “Identification and characterization of a novel CprA reductive dehalogenase specific to highly chlorinated phenols from Desulfitobacterium hafniense strain PCP-1,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 76, no. 22, pp. 7536–7540, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Neumann, A. Siebert, T. Trescher, S. Reinhardt, G. Wohlfarth, and G. Diekert, “Tetrachloroethene reductive dehalogenase of Dehalospirillum multivorans: substrate specificity of the native enzyme and its corrinoid cofactor,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 177, no. 5, pp. 420–426, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. S. Tang and E. A. Edwards, “Identification of Dehalobacter reductive dehalogenases that catalyse dechlorination of chloroform, 1,1,1-trichloroethane and 1,1-dichloroethane,” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, vol. 368, no. 1616, p. 20120318, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. B. A. van de Pas, H. Smidt, W. R. Hagen et al., “Purification and molecular characterization of ortho-chlorophenol reductive dehalogenase, a key enzyme of halorespiration in Desulfitobacterium dehalogenans,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 29, pp. 20287–20292, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. N. Yoshida, K. Asahi, Y. Sakakibara, K. Miyake, and A. Katayama, “Isolation and quantitative detection of tetrachloroethene (PCE)-dechlorinating bacteria in unsaturated subsurface soils contaminated with chloroethenes,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. F. He, “E. coli genomic DNA extraction,” Bio-Protocol, vol. 1, no. 14, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. M. Martin, “Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads,” EMBnet Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 10–12, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. D. R. Zerbino and E. Birney, “Velvet: algorithms for de novo short read assembly using de Bruijn graphs,” Genome Research, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 821–829, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H. Sugawara, H. Mori, and K. Kurokawa, “Microbial Genome Annotation Pipeline (MiGAP) for diverse users,” in Proceedings of the The 20th International Conference on Genome Informatics (GIW2009, Poster and Software Demonstrations, p. S001, Yokohama, Japan, 2009.
  41. R. K. Aziz, D. Bartels, A. Best et al., “The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology,” BMC Genomics, vol. 9, article 75, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. J. Y. Jung, S. H. Lee, J. M. Kim et al., “Metagenomic analysis of kimchi, a Traditional Korean fermented food,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 2264–2274, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. F. Maphosa, M. W. J. Van Passel, W. M. De Vos, and H. Smidt, “Metagenome analysis reveals yet unexplored reductive dechlorinating potential of Dehalobacter sp. E1 growing in co-culture with Sedimentibacter sp,” Environmental Microbiology Reports, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 604–616, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. R. Overbeek, T. Begley, R. M. Butler et al., “The subsystems approach to genome annotation and its use in the project to annotate 1000 genomes,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 33, no. 17, pp. 5691–5702, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. K. Tamura, G. Stecher, D. Peterson, A. Filipski, and S. Kumar, “MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0,” Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2725–2729, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. N. Yoshida, H. Iguchi, H. Yurimoto, A. Murakami, and Y. Sakai, “Aquatic plant surface as a niche for methanotrophs,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 5, article no. 30, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. E. R. Hendrickson, J. A. Payne, R. M. Young et al., “Molecular analysis of Dehalococcoides 16S ribosomal DNA from chloroethene-contaminated sites throughout North America and Europe,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 485–495, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. M. Pöritz, C. L. Schiffmann, G. Hause et al., “Dehalococcoides mccartyi strain DCMB5 respires a broad spectrum of chlorinated aromatic compounds,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 587–596, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. R. Seshadri, L. Adrian, D. E. Fouts et al., “Genome sequence of the PCE-dechlorinating bacterium Dehalococcoides ethenogenes,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5706, pp. 105–108, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. P. J. McMurdie, S. F. Behrens, J. A. Müller et al., “Localized plasticity in the streamlined genomes of vinyl chloride respiring Dehalococcoides,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 5, no. 11, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. Xu, M. K. Bjursell, J. Himrod et al., “A genomic view of the human-Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron symbiosis,” Science, vol. 299, no. 5615, pp. 2074–2076, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. Kube, A. Beck, S. H. Zinder, H. Kuhl, R. Reinhardt, and L. Adrian, “Genome sequence of the chlorinated compound-respiring bacterium Dehalococcoides species strain CBDB1,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 1269–1273, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. B. M. Rosner, P. L. McCarty, and A. M. Spormann, “In vitro studies on reductive vinyl chloride dehalogenation by an anaerobic mixed culture,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 4139–4144, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. H. Futamata, S. Kaiya, M. Sugawara, and A. Hiraishi, “Phylogenetic and transcriptional analyses of a tetrachloroethene-dechlorinating "Dehalococcoides" enrichment culture TUT2264 and its reductive-dehalogenase genes,” Microbes and Environments, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 330–337, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. Duhamel and E. A. Edwards, “Microbial composition of chlorinated ethene-degrading cultures dominated by Dehalococcoides,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 538–549, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. R. A. Freeborn, K. A. West, V. K. Bhupathiraju et al., “Phylogenetic analysis of TCE-dechlorinating consortia enriched on a variety of electron donors,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 21, pp. 8358–8368, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. N. Liu, H. Li, M. Li, L. Ding, C. Weng, and C. Dong, “Oxygen exposure effects on the dechlorinating activities of a trichloroethene-dechlorination microbial consortium,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 240, pp. 98–105, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar