Risk Factors of Recurrence and Malignant Transformation of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma

Gamrot-Wrzoł, Marta; Sowa, Paweł; Lisowska, Grażyna; Ścierski, Wojciech; Misiołek, Maciej

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9195163

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 | Article ID 9195163 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9195163

Risk Factors of Recurrence and Malignant Transformation of Sinonasal Inverted Papilloma

Marta Gamrot-Wrzoł,¹Paweł Sowa,¹Grażyna Lisowska,¹Wojciech Ścierski,¹and Maciej Misiołek¹

Academic Editor: Ryuji Yasumatsu

Received06 Aug 2017

Accepted22 Oct 2017

Published09 Nov 2017

Abstract

Sinonasal inverted papilloma is a relatively rare disease; however, it is prevalent enough for every ENT practitioner to encounter it several times throughout medical routines. Despite the developments in experimental and clinical medicine as well as surgical techniques, our knowledge of this disease is still inadequate. With improved imaging and better diagnostic techniques, proper diagnosis and qualification for surgical approaches leave no doubt. Although the endoscopic approach seems to be the gold standard for such condition, some cases may additionally require an external approach. Regardless of the type of surgery, postoperative management is crucial for both healing and long-term follow-up. Unfortunately, the procedures are still lacking in explicit and standardized postoperative management guidelines. Moreover, an important issue is still the need for a biomarker indicative of inverted papilloma and its malignant transformation. Several particles, within the spotlight of the researchers, have been SCCA, Ki-67, Bcl-2, Wnt proteins, and many more. Nevertheless, the topic requires further investigations.

1. Introduction

Sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) was first described in 1854 by Ward and belongs to a rare group of Schneiderian papillomas—benign tumors deriving from the Schneiderian membrane—the embryonal ectodermal remnant forming the boundary between the nasal and sinus mucosa [1, 2]. It may differentiate into three types: oncocytic papilloma, fungiform papilloma, and, the most prevalent, inverted papilloma. The inverted papilloma is three times more frequent in men than in women and the peak onsets are recorded in the 4th–7th decade of life [2]. The location is usually unilateral with the origin at the nasal sidewall in the area of the middle nasal concha. Such tumors are characterized by rapid growth and lead to destruction of the osseous boundaries of the nasal cavity and the sinuses, spreading over the adjacent regions of the facial skeleton and the anterior cranial fossa [3]. The literature also described some single cases of ectopic location of such tumors (e.g., in the middle ear, pharynx, nasopharynx, oral cavity, palatine tonsil, and lacrimal sac) beyond the sinonasal mucosa which may be associated with displacement of the Schneiderian membrane during the embryonal growth [4, 5]. Etiology of the IP has not been well recognized. Mentioned among some potential factors having a role in respiratory tract remodeling into the inverted papilloma are, among others, chronic inflammatory condition, nicotinism, and HPV infection [5, 6]. The symptoms of IP include unilateral (most frequent) occlusion, relapsing nasal hemorrhage, and impaired sense of smell or anosmia. Such primary manifestations may be accompanied by headaches, lacrimation, or impaired vision [7].

2. Diagnostics and Treatment

Obviously, the diagnosis of IP needs histopathological verification. It is usually possible to take the material with the use of nasal and/or sinus endoscopy. The procedure allows clear imaging of IP as a pink/grey/brown polypous, soft tumor with nontransparent and uneven surface [2, 8] (Figure 1). Depending on location, it may be necessary to take a specimen through external access (extremely rare); it should be remembered, however, that an open biopsy brings about a risk of dissemination of the lesion over the adjacent healthy tissues [8]. Both computer tomography (CT scanning) and magnetic resonance (MR imaging) are elective investigations to evaluate the tumor extent and to design the method of IP surgery, although, because of bony structures visualization, CT seems more interesting for some surgeons [3, 9]. It is possible to locate the papilloma attachment site; in the CT scan, it is represented by a limited (focal) hyperostosis [10] (Figure 2).

(a)

(b)

CT scanning does not allow, however, for explicit differentiation between soft tissues and secretions retained within the sinuses, which may result in overinterpretation of the extent of the lesion. In order to ensure an appropriate surgical method, it is suggested to perform complementary, preoperative nasal endoscopy or, if the tumor extends beyond the endoscopic range (frontal sinus, orbital fossa, and cerebral cranium), to complement the investigations with contrast-enhanced MR (Figure 3) and design additional external access. The intraoperative endoscopic image will ultimately verify the extent of the tumor, in most cases allowing for differentiation of the papilloma mass form the surrounding inflammatory lesions [3].

The most frequent method used currently to evaluate the clinical preoperative grade is the four-stage Krouse classification, taking into account the tumor location and malignancy [35]: T1: tumor restricted to the nasal cavity only T2: tumor restricted to ethmoid cells and/or medial wall of the maxillary sinus T3: tumor extending to the lateral, inferior, superior, anterior, or posterior wall of the maxillary sinus or penetrating the sphenoid or frontal sinus T4: tumor extending beyond the sinonasal boundaries and any malignant tumor

In 2007, Cannady et al. published the newest staging method showing correlation between anatomical extension and recurrence rate for IP managed by advanced endoscopic techniques [11] (Table 1).

The elective procedure for IP is total resection of the tumor [36]. The surgical treatment strategies were changing through the years. For a long time, medial maxillectomy with ethmoidectomy via lateral rhinotomy was recommended as the treatment gold standard for IP [5]. The situation has radically changed along with the progress in endoscopic solutions. The functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS), which is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure to open the nasal sinuses, has been considered a gold standard for inflammatory conditions of the nasal sinuses for more than 40 years now [37]. Soon after the first endoscopic removal of sinonasal IP, described by Stammberger in 1981, endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) became the method of choice for inverted papilloma and other tumors’ management [38]. According to the Krouse staging, patients with stage T1 and T2 tumors may usually undergo successful endoscopic sinonasal surgery, while at stage T3 or T4 it is most frequently needed to design treatment assuming multiple transnasal and/or external access [39, 40].

The key issue is qualification of the patient for a proper method of the surgery which is supposed to remove a lesion radically, with special regard to the ossified foci [41]. ESS has numerous advantages, as compared to open procedures: no external traces of the surgery (scars or any other facial deformations of the patient), shorter healing, shorter hospitalization, and consequently reduced inpatient costs. Good intraoperative visualization facilitates resection of the tumor, preserving the healthy sinus mucosa and other anatomic structures and ensuring physiological functions of the mucosa to maintain proper olfaction and ventilation of nasal cavities and nasal sinuses. Moreover, it is always possible to supplement the procedures with external access. What is extremely important is that the observed recurrence rate following ESS was significantly lower than in case of open techniques [7]. It should be noted, however, that endoscopic techniques are extremely valuable only if performed by experienced surgeons who must be ready to supplement the procedures with external access, if needed [7, 36].

3. Recurrence and Malignant Transformation Risk Factors

The major cause for recurrence of the disease, or rather failure to cure it, is in case of IP the incomplete resection of the tumor or insufficient cleanliness of the surgical margin [40]. The risk depends, first of all, on proper selection of the surgery technique, as the highest rate of recurrence was observed following the restricted procedures, like polypectomy, traditional ethmoidectomy, sphenoidectomy, or Caldwell-Luc surgery, reaching even 80% [3, 42]. In one of the latest publications, Nygren et al. quoted the overall IP recurrence rate at the level of 25.3% with 9% malignant transformation, while the lowest recurrence rate was observed after combined treatment: endoscopic and open method [43]. The vast majority of the authors believe that, due to subsequent modifications of ESS, the risk of recurrence may even be as low as about 3%, confirming that the technique should be accepted as an elective procedure for IP [44, 45].

The most frequent recurrence is then in tumors located in sites with difficult access, such as the frontal sinus or even the maxillary sinus, the inferior wall of which may be found far below the level of the nasal cavity floor, where radical resection of a lesion in the region of angulus anteromedialis may appear impossible, if only via endoscopic access [15, 40, 46].

A condition for appropriate (radical) surgery is to resect the tumor along with the periosteum, with special regard to the ossified focus observed upon CT scanning, that is, a potential “origin site” of the tumor [3, 38]. Moreover, to ensure cleanliness of the surgical margin, it is recommended to resect the sinus mucosa and periosteum with 5 mm margin [40]. A standard procedure should be the intraoperative histopathological investigation to prove tumor resection with a margin of healthy tissues [46]. Nevertheless, one should not forget that IP recurrence may occur also in locations distant from the primary or at the opposite side, which may be explained by the theory of multicenter origin of IP [40]. The relation between IP stage, as per Krouse, and the recurrence rate is disputable. The available literature suggests more frequent recurrence in patients with higher Krouse stage tumor (mainly T3 and T4); however, the difference is not significant enough to hypothesize that ultimately [40]. For the time being, the literature quotes no uniform standard for postoperative procedures in IP. Early postoperative ENT follow-up aims at supervision of postsurgical healing, while long-term observation is intended to detect any possible relapse or malignant transformation early enough [40].

Based on our own experience as well as the congress contributions (14th International Rhinologic Conference, Rhinoforum 2015), our center adopted a postoperative procedure, assuming follow-up every three months during the first two years after the surgery, every six months during the subsequent two years, and then once a year for at least five years, as approx. 90% recur during that very period [47]. Moreover, a lifelong follow-up is recommended so that no later recurrence or metachronous foci are missed [41]. Endoscopic examination is a gold standard in postoperative follow-up in IP, complemented, if needed, with HP specimens or CT scanning and/or MRI, where suspected recurrence recommends MRI as a basic examination [47].

It is thought that about 9% of inverted papillomas transform into malignant tumors. The most frequent malignant tumor deriving from IP is squamous cell carcinoma [43]. A malignant tumor usually develops in the IP primary mass (synchronous focus); however, in some cases, it follows the surgical therapies of IP (metachronous focus) [2, 43]. Prognosis in squamous carcinoma in IP is poor. 5- and 10-year survival reaches 39.6% and 31.8%, respectively. The prognosis is poorer in tumors diagnosed in elderly age, infiltrating the cranial basis or the orbital cavity as well as being well advanced and showing low differentiation [48].

Lately, it was reported that MRI examination can be helpful in recognizing malignant transformation of IP. We already know that IPs in the conventional MRI should be indicated by a convoluted cerebriform pattern (CCP), a band-like region of hyperintense and hypointense signals on T2-weighted images or/and postcontrast-enhanced T1-weighted images. Recently, authors suggested that the focal loss of a CCP might be indicatory for IPs concomitant with malignancy [49, 50]. According to Wang et al., nonenhanced and static combined with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI could be a useful tool for differential diagnosis of malignancy in IP [51].

The literature available contains scarce information on the recurrence risk factors in IP (Table 2) while the results remain unclear. Although no direct relation has been shown between smoking and the tendency towards malignant transformation in IP, higher tendency for IP recurrence has been observed in smokers. Resulting in swelling and chronic inflammatory condition of the nasal and sinus mucosa, smoking may contribute to elevated risk of recurrence following the surgery [52].

Although infection with the human papilloma virus (HPV) seems to show a documented relation with the onset of IP, the actual dependencies between HPV and pathophysiology of IP remain unclear, while the reports published are controversial [14, 18]. HPV infection is thought to have a role in tumor genesis through the viral oncoproteins E6 and E7. They disturb the cellular cycle mechanisms, which results in unregulated cell proliferation and oncogenesis, while the viral protein E5 enhances activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), leading to stronger mitogenic activity [27, 28, 53]. Recently, relation between HPV, in particular HPV-18, and higher risk of malignant transformation of IP has been emphasized again [54].

Restricted access, preventing accurate evaluation of the nasal sinuses, and difficulties in distinguishing an inflammatory condition from the papilloma mass upon imaging (both in the primary disease and during the follow-up of recurrence) indicate the need for an independent marker to establish explicitly the presence of IP itself as well as possible transformation into a malignant tumor.

Among the first IP associated markers evaluated and best described is the squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCCA). This protein belongs to the group of serine protease inhibitors, serpins. SCCA is known as a free circulatory antigen, passively released into circulation by the squamous cells [55]. SCCA protein is a nonspecific marker, which has already found its use in monitoring and treatment of head and neck tumors, ovarian cancer, and lung or hepatic cancer [56]. It has been observed throughout the recent years that patients with IP show elevated SCCA in both IP diagnosed de novo and recurrence. Moreover, SCCA level was reduced in all patients after the surgery and no elevation was observed in sinus inflammatory conditions [30, 31, 33]. In some patients, circulatory SCCA was growing even before it was possible to observe a tumor macroscopically [30]. Also, the size of a tumor correlated positively with SCCA levels in IP. Some recent studies pointed to smoking as potentially influencing the SCCA levels; however, such relation needs further investigations [31]. What appears extremely interesting is that SCCA may also have a role in monitoring of IP transformation into squamous cell carcinoma. So far, two subtypes of this protein have been recognized, coded by different genes and showing slightly different structure and effect: SCCA1 and SCCA2 [32, 57]. Higher mRNA expressions of SCCA1 and SCCA2 were observed in the IP patients compared to individuals with carcinoma and inflammatory conditions [31, 58]. This very relation of SCCA2/SCCA1 may be used to detect squamous cell carcinoma in IP patients, as in the group of patients with malignant transformation it was substantially higher than in patients with IP only or the inflammatory conditions [31].

Other particles, whose role is still investigated and which may potentially have a prognostic value, are Ki-67, survivin, Bcl-2, Wnt proteins, metallothionein 2A, CCAAT, C/EBPs, C/EBP, and CK10 proteins, E-cadherins, and β-catenin, as well as p16, p53, EGFR proteins, cyclin D1, and PLUNC (palate, lung, and nasal epithelium clone protein) (Table 3).

4. Conclusion

Sinonasal inverted papilloma is a statistically rare condition; however, it is prevalent enough for each ENT practitioner to encounter this disease multiple times throughout his professional routines. Although progress in experimental and clinical medicine and development of endoscopic surgical techniques extended our knowledge of IP, the treatment, diagnostics, and postoperative management demand further improvement along with better recognition of IP pathophysiology. Regardless of the surgical method selected, the follow-up must be based upon frequent visits with accurate endoscopic examination and, if necessary, additional imaging and microscopic procedures.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

N. Ward, “A mirror of the practice of medicine and surgery in the hospitals of London: London Hospital,” The Lancet, vol. 64, no. 1632, pp. 480–482, 1854.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Barnes, “Schneiderian papillomas and nonsalivary glandular neoplasms of the head and neck,” Modern Pathology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 279–297, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Goyal, “Advances in endoscopic resection of sinonasal neoplasms,” Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 277–284, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Lampertico, W. O. Russell, and W. S. MacComb, “Squamous papilloma of the upper respiratory epithelium,” Archives of Pathology, vol. 75, pp. 293–302, 1963.
View at: Google Scholar
E. N. Myers, J. L. Fernau, J. T. Johnson, J. C. Tabet, and E. L. Barnes, “Management of inverted papilloma,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 481–490, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
P. G. Barbieri, D. Tomenzoli, L. Morassi et al., “Sino-nasal inverted papillomas and occupational etiology,” Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Ed Ergonomia, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 422–426, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Ungari, E. Riccardi, G. Reale et al., “Management and treatment of sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Annali di Stomatologia, vol. 6, no. (3-4), pp. 87–90, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Wassef, P. S. Batra, and S. Barnett, “Skull base inverted papilloma: a comprehensive review,” ISRN Surgery, vol. 2012, Article ID 175903, 34 pages, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Maroldi, D. Farina, L. Palvarini, D. Lombardi, D. Tomenzoli, and P. Nicolai, “Magnetic resonance imaging findings of inverted papilloma: differential diagnosis with malignant sinonasal tumors,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 305–310, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
R. K. Bhalla and E. D. Wright, “Predicting the site of attachment of sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Rhinology, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 345–348, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. B. Cannady, P. S. Batra, N. B. Sautter, H.-J. Roh, and M. J. Citardi, “New staging system for sinonasal inverted papilloma in the endoscopic era,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 117, no. 7, pp. 1283–1287, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. H. Jardine, G. R. Davies, and M. A. Birchall, “Recurrence and malignant degeneration of 89 cases of inverted papilloma diagnosed in a non-tertiary referral population between 1975 and 1995: clinical predictors and p53 studies,” Clinical Otolaryngology & Allied Sciences, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 363–369, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. W. Suh, G. W. Facer, K. D. Devine, L. H. Weiland, and R. D. Zujko, “Inverting papilloma of the nose and paranasal sinuses,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 1977.
View at: Google Scholar
H.-J. Roh, S. J. Mun, K.-S. Cho, and S.-L. Hong, “Smoking, not human papilloma virus infection, is a risk factor for recurrence of sinonasal inverted papilloma,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 79–82, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Katori, A. Nozawa, and M. Tsukuda, “Histopathological parameters of recurrence and malignant transformation in sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 214–218, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Liu, “Quantitative studies on nuclear DNA content and morphological features in inverted papillomas of the nasal cavities and paranasal sinuses,” Chinese Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 326–382, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
Y.-A. Tsou, H.-J. Huang, T.-C. Wang, C.-J. Tai, C.-M. Chen, and C. Y.-C. Chen, “Evaluation of correlation of cell cycle proteins and Ki-67 interaction in paranasal sinus inverted papilloma prognosis and squamous cell carcinoma transformation,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 634945, 16 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Meng, X. Wu, and Y. Yuan, “Significances of COX-2, p21, Ki-67 expression and HPV infection in nasal inverted papilloma,” Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, vol. 28, no. 23, pp. 1823–1827, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Mumbuc, M. Karakok, T. Baglam, E. Karatas, C. Durucu, and Y. Kibar, “Immunohistochemical analysis of PCNA, Ki67 and p53 in nasal polyposis and sinonasal inverted papillomas,” Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 237–241, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Stasikowska-Kanicka, M. Wagrowska-Danilewicz, and M. Danilewicz, “Immunohistochemical study on survivin in sinonasal tumors and its relationship with the immunoexpression of Ki67 and Bcl-2,” Folia Histochemica et Cytobiologica, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 225–231, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Lu, C. Wang, L. Hao, G. Yin, and R. Hao, “The expression and significance of programmed cell death 5 and Bcelllymphoma/lewkmia-2 in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, vol. 28, no. 17, pp. 1301–1304, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. G. Jung, H. W. Lee, M. G. Kim et al., “Role of Wnt signaling pathway in progression of sinonasal inverted papilloma to squamous cell carcinoma,” American Journal of Rhinology Allergy, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. e81–e86, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Starska, M. Bryś, E. Forma et al., “Metallothionein 2A core promoter region genetic polymorphism and its impact on the risk, tumor behavior, and recurrences of sinonasal inverted papilloma (Schneiderian papilloma),” Tumor Biology, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 8559–8571, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E.-H. Shabana, J. Depondt, M. Hourseau, F. Walker, and A. Berdal, “Production and significance of CCAAT enhancer binding proteins alpha and beta in sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Histology and Histopathology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 53–60, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Yaun, X. Meng, and X. Wu, “Expression and significance of C/EBPα and CK10 in nasal inverted papilloma,” Journal of Clinical Otorhinolaryngology, Head, and Neck Surgery, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 437–440, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
B. S. Koo, B. J. Jung, and S. G. Kim, “Altered expression of E-cadherin and β-catenin in malignant transformation of sinonasal inverted papillomas,” Rhinology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 479–485, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
G. C. Lin, A. Scheel, S. Akkina et al., “Epidermal growth factor receptor, p16, cyclin D1, and p53 staining patterns for inverted papilloma,” International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 885–889, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yamashita, M. Hasegawa, Z. Deng et al., “Human papillomavirus infection and immunohistochemical expression of cell cycle proteins pRb, p53, and p16 INK4a in sinonasal diseases,” Infectious Agents and Cancer, vol. 10, no. 1, article no. 23, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-C. Chao and S.-Y. Fang, “Expression of epidermal growth factor receptor in the inverted papilloma and squamous cell carcinoma of nasal cavity,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 265, no. 8, pp. 917–922, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Matoušek, K. Zeleník, K. Šafarčík, L. Čábalová, and P. Komínek, “Squamous cell carcinoma antigen as a marker of sinonasal inverted papilloma,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 271, no. 3, pp. 535–538, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Suzuki, Z. Deng, M. Hasegawa, T. Uehara, A. Kiyuna, and H. Maeda, “Squamous cell carcinoma antigen production in nasal inverted papilloma,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 365–370, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yamashita, T. Uehara, M. Hasegawa et al., “Squamous cell carcinoma antigen as a diagnostic marker of nasal inverted papilloma,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 122–127, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. V. W. J. van Zijl, D. A. Monserez, T. I. M. Korevaar et al., “Postoperative value of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen as a predictor of recurrence in sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Clinical Otolaryngology, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 528–535, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Yasumatsu, T. Nakashima, M. Masuda et al., “Clinical value of serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen in the management of sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Head & Neck, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 44–48, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Krouse, “Development of a staging system for inverted papilloma,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 110, no. 6, pp. 965–968, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. D. Karkos, G. Fyrmpas, S. C. Carrie, and A. C. Swift, “Endoscopic versus open surgical interventions for inverted nasal papilloma: a systematic review,” Clinical Otolaryngology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 499–503, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Weber and W. Hosemann, “Comprehensive review on endonasal endoscopic sinus surgery,” GMS Current Topics in Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 14, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Carta, B. Verillaud, and P. Herman, “Role of endoscopic approach in the management of inverted papilloma,” Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 21–24, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Oikawa, Y. Furuta, Y. Nakamaru, N. Oridate, and S. Fukuda, “Preoperative staging and surgical approaches for sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, vol. 116, no. 9, pp. 674–680, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Xiao-Ting, L. Peng, W. Xiu-Qing et al., “Factors affecting recurrence of sinonasal inverted papilloma.,” European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 270, no. 4, pp. 1349–1353, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. J. P. M. Adriaensen, K.-H. Lim, C. Georgalas, S. M. Reinartz, and W. J. Fokkens, “Challenges in the management of inverted papilloma: a review of 72 revision cases,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 322–328, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Raveh, R. Feinmesser, T. Shpitzer, E. Yaniv, and K. Segal, “Inverted papilloma of the nose and paranasal sinuses: a study of 56 cases and review of the literature,” Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 32, no. 12, pp. 1163–1167, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Nygren, K. Kiss, C. Von Buchwald, and A. Bilde, “Rate of recurrence and malignant transformation in 88 cases with inverted papilloma between 1998–2008,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 136, no. 3, pp. 333–336, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Carta, J.-P. Blancal, B. Verillaud et al., “Surgical management of inverted papilloma: approaching a new standard for surgery,” Head & Neck, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1415–1420, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Grayson, S. S. Khichi, D.-Y. Cho, K. O. Riley, and B. A. Woodworth, “Management strategies for skull base inverted papilloma,” Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (United States), vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 179–183, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Khandekar, A. Dive, R. Mishra, and N. Upadhyaya, “Sinonasal inverted papilloma: a case report and mini review of histopathological features,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, vol. 19, no. 3, p. 405, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Petit, L. Vivarrat-Perrin, P. Champsaur et al., “Radiological follow-up of inverted papilloma,” European Radiology, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1184–1189, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q.-Z. Liang, D.-Z. Li, X.-L. Wang, H. Huang, Z.-G. Xu, and Y.-H. Wu, “Survival outcome of squamous cell carcinoma arising from sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 128, no. 18, pp. 2457–2461, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Yasumatsu, T. Nakashima, M. Sato et al., “Clinical management of squamous cell carcinoma associated with sinonasal inverted papilloma,” Auris Nasus Larynx, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 98–103, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Y. Jeon, H.-J. Kim, S.-K. Chung et al., “Sinonasal inverted papilloma: value of convoluted cerebriform pattern on MR imaging,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 1556–1560, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, Z. Zhang, X. Chen, J. Li, and J. Xian, “Value of magnetic resonance imaging including dynamic contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation between inverted papilloma and malignant tumors in the nasal cavity,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 127, no. 9, pp. 1696–1701, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. J. Moon, D. Y. Lee, M.-W. Suh et al., “Cigarette smoking increases risk of recurrence for sinonasal inverted papilloma,” American Journal of Rhinology & Allergy, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 325–329, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Pim, M. Collins, and L. Banks, “Human papillomavirus type 16 E5 gene stimulates the transforming activity of the epidermal growth factor receptor,” Oncogene, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 27–32, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
R.-W. Zhao, Z.-Q. Guo, and R.-X. Zhang, “Human papillomavirus infection and the malignant transformation of sinonasal inverted papilloma: A meta-analysis,” Journal of Clinical Virology, vol. 79, pp. 36–43, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Stepien and J. Kornafel, “Squamous cell carcinomaantigen (SCC) indiagnostics andmonitoring treatment of patients with cervical cancer,” Wspolczesna Onkologia, vol. 10, pp. 316–320, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
C. Turato and P. Pontisso, “SERPINB3 (serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade B (ovalbumin), member 3),” Atlas of Genetics and Cytogenetics in Oncology and Haematology, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 202–209, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Schick, Y. Kamachi, A. J. Bartuski et al., “Squamous cell carcinoma antigen 2 is a novel serpin that inhibits the chymotrypsin-like proteinases cathepsin g and mast cell chymase,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 272, no. 3, pp. 1849–1855, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Yasumatsu, T. Nakashima, Y. Kuratomi et al., “Serum squamous cell carcinoma antigen is a useful biologic marker in patients with inverted papillomas of the sinonasal tract,” Cancer, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 152–158, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2017 Marta Gamrot-Wrzoł et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

17411

Downloads

1461

Citations