Learning and Treatment of Anaphylaxis by Laypeople: A Simulation Study Using Pupilar Technology

Table 2

Analysis of identification of symptoms (SI).

													Friedman Test (Sig.)
	T1			T2			T3			PT
	(10)			(13)			(15)			(12)
	Mean	SD	CI (95%)	Mean	SD	CI (95%)	Mean	SD	CI (95%)	Mean	SD	CI (95%)
S1	36.3	53.9		15.1	21		34.7	30		8.7	9.7		FP F3 = 0.011
S2	5.6	9.9		1.5	3.2		3.2	7.4		0.6	1		F1 F2 F3 FP > 0.05
S3	4.9	11.5		1.4	2.3		2.2	3.2		0.5	1		FP F3 = 0.046
S1%	23.5	24.1		11	9.1		19.6	13.4		15.2	14.2		F1 F2 F3 FP > 0.05
S2%	3.9	6.3		1.8	3.5		2.3	5.7		1.3	2.3		F1 F2 F3 FP > 0.05
S3%	6.5	14.7		1.3	1.7		1.6	2.6		1.1	2.6		F1 F2 F3 FP > 0.05

T1, group that received training consisting of a fictional video with professional actors, scripted by paediatricians; T2, group that received training consisting of an instructional video made by the Spanish association for people with allergies; T3, group that received training consisting of an amateur video with educational purpose recorded by paediatricians; PT, group that received face-to-face training by a paediatrician; S1, number of visual fixations towards the signs and symptoms that the participant makes before using the autoinjector; S2, number of visual fixations towards the signs and symptoms that the participant makes during the administration of the autoinjector; S3, number of visual fixations towards the signs and symptoms that the participant makes after the administration of the autoinjector; S1%, percentage of visual fixations towards the signs and symptoms that the participant makes before using the autoinjector; S2%, percentage of visual fixations towards the signs and symptoms that the participant makes during the administration of the autoinjector; S3%, percentage of visual fixations towards the signs and symptoms that the participant makes after the administration of the autoinjector.