Learning and Treatment of Anaphylaxis by Laypeople: A Simulation Study Using Pupilar Technology

Table 3

Analysis of autoinjector administration skills (AS).

Variable														df	P	V
	T1			T2			T3			PT
	n (10)	%	z-value	n (13)	%	z-value	n (15)	%	-value	n (12)	%	z-value
Autoinjector error (AE)
Bad	4	60	−0.3	6	46,2	0.2	12	80		0	0		17.408	3	0.001	0.59
Good	6	40	0.3	7	53,8	−0.2	3	20		12	100
Thigh localization (TL)
Bad	7	70		1	7,7	−1.6	3	21,4	−0.3	1	8,3	−1.5	14.949	3	0.002	0.55
Good	3	30		12	92,3	1.6	11	78,6	0.3	11	91,7	1.5
Quality administration (AQ)
Bad	10	100	1.8	8	61,5	−1.9	14	93,3	1.6	8	66,7	−1.3	8.269	3	0.041	0.41
Good	0	0	−1.8	5	38,5	1.9	1	6,7	−1.6	4	33,3	1.3
Efficient administration (AE)
Bad	9	90		6	46,2	−1.2	12	80	1.9	3	25		13.413	3	0.004	0.52
Good	1	10		7	53,8	1.2	3	20	−1.9	9	75

Notes. : Chi square; : significance; : Cramér’s V; OR: odds ratio; df: degrees of freedom; z-values indicate if the observed count within a specific cell is significantly larger or smaller than the expected count under the null hypothesis of no association between the variables. difference: −1.96 < z-value > 1.96. T1, group that received training consisting of a fictional video with professional actors, scripted by paediatricians; T2, group that received training consisting of an instructional video made by the Spanish association for people with allergies; T3; group that received training consisting of an amateur video with educational purpose recorded by paediatricians; PT, group that received face-to-face training by a paediatrician.