Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2018, Article ID 1013453, 30 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1013453
Research Article

Evaluating the Longitudinal Item and Category Stability of the SF-36 Full and Summary Scales Using Rasch Analysis

1Curtin University, School of Occupational Therapy, Social Work and Speech Pathology, Bentley, Australia
2Monash University, Occupational Therapy Department, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
3The University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
4The University of Newcastle, School of Medicine and Public Health, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence should be addressed to Reinie Cordier; ua.ude.nitruc@reidroc.einier

Received 6 August 2018; Accepted 1 October 2018; Published 4 November 2018

Academic Editor: Adam Reich

Copyright © 2018 Reinie Cordier et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. B. Mokkink, C. B. Terwee, D. L. Patrick et al., “The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 63, no. 7, pp. 737–745, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. D. Kasper, L. E. Pezzin, and J. B. Rice, “Stability and changes in living arrangements: Relationship to nursing home admission and timing of placement,” The Journals of Gerontology B, vol. 65B, no. 1, pp. 783–791, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. A. K. Leist and J. P. Mackenbach, “Social, behavioral, and contextual influences on cognitive fucntion and decline over the life course,” in Proceedings of the Health and Cognition in Old Age: From Biomedicl and Life Course Factors to Policy and Practice, A. K. Leist, J. Kulmala, and F. Nyqvist, Eds., pp. 105–122, 2014.
  4. B. C. Goodwin, S. March, L. Zajdlewicz, R. H. Osbourne, J. Dunn, and S. K. Chambers, “Health literacy and the health status of men with prostate cancer,” Psycho-Oncology, 2018. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. D. Hart, “Measurement issues in health-related quality of life assessments in physical activity research,” Doctorate of Philosophy in Health and Human Performance, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  6. Y. Hsiao, C. Shih, W. Yu, and C. Hsieh, “Examining unidimensionality and improving reliability for the eight subscales of the SF-36 in opioid-dependent patients using Rasch analysis,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 279–285, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  7. W.-M. Liang, H.-W. Chang, H.-W. Chen, and Y.-G. Tsai, “Assessing the unidimensionality among scales from WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 in chronic lung disease patients,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 13, no. 9, p. 1562, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Ronel, A. Dinkel, E. Wolf et al., “Anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life in aging people living with HIV compared to diabetes patients and patients with minor health conditions: A longitudinal study,” Psychology, Health & Medicine, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 823–830, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. J. E. Ware, M. Kosinski, J. E. Dewey, and B. Gandek, SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide, Quality Metric Inc, Lincoln, RI, 1993.
  10. Y. F. Yu, A. P. Yu, and J. Ahn, “Investigating differential item functioning by chronic diseases in the SF-36 health survey: A latent trait analysis using MIMIC models,” Medical Care, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 851–859, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL),” https://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/.
  12. J. E. Ware, M. Kosinski, J. E. Dewey, and B. Gandek, SF-36 Health Survey: Manual and interpretation guide, Quality Metric Inc, 2000.
  13. R. K. Hambleton and R. W. Jones, “An NCME instructional module on: Comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to development,” Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 38–47, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  14. M. O. Edelen and B. B. Reeve, “Applying item response theory (IRT) modeling to questionnaire development, evaluation and refinement,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 16, no. Supplement 1, pp. 5–18, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  15. T. G. Bond and C. M. Fox, Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurment in the human sciences, Taylor & Francis, New York, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2015.
  16. S. M. Haley, C. A. McHorney, and J. E. Ware Jr., “Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. Unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 671–684, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S.-H. Kim and W.-Y. So, “Rasch validation of the SF-36 for assessing the health status of Korean older adults,” Journal of Physical Therapy Science, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 601–606, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. Martin, M. Kosinski, J. Bjorner, J. Ware, R. Maclean, and T. Li, “Item response theory methods can improve the measurement of physical function by combining the modified health assessment questionnaire and the SF-36 physical function scale,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 647–660, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  19. C. A. McHorney, S. M. Haley, and J. E. Ware, “Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-40): II. Comparison of relative precision using Likert and Rasch scoring methods,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 451–461, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  20. W. J. Brown, L. Bryson, J. Byles et al., “Women's Health Australia: Recruitment for a National Longitudinal Cohort Study,” Women and Health, vol. 28, pp. 23–40, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  21. C. Lee, A. J. Dobson, W. J. Brown et al., “Cohort Profile: The Australian longitudinal study on Women's Health,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 987–991, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. L. Brilleman, N. A. Pachana, and A. J. Dobson, “The impact of attrition on the representativeness of cohort studies of older people,” BMC Medical Research Methodology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 71, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. G. Mishra and M. Schofield, “Norms for the physical and mental health component summary scores of the SF-36 for young, middle-aged and older Australia women,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 7, no. 3, Article ID 1024917510063, pp. 215–220, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  24. L. Leigh, J. Byles, and G. Mishra, “Change in physical function among women as they age: Findings from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 981–991, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. L. Leigh, J. E. Byles, C. Chojenta, and N. A. Pachana, “Late life changes in mental health: a longitudinal study of 9683 women,” Aging & Mental Health, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1044–1054, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. M. Linacre, WINSTEPS Rasch measurement computer program: Version 3.92.0, Winsteps, Chicago, IL, 2016b.
  27. B. D. Wright and G. N. Masters, Rating Scale Analysis: Rasch Measurement [Masters, thesis], MESA Press, Chicago, IL, 1982.
  28. Z. Yan, C. Lum, R. Lui, S. Chu, and M. Lui, “Measuring Teaching Assistants' Efficacy using the Rasch Model,” Journal of Applied Measurement, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 60–75, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  29. J. M. Linacre, A user's guide to W i n s t e p s® Rasch-model computer programs: Program manual 3.92.0, Mesa-Press, Chicago, IL, 2016a.
  30. J. M. Linacre, “Investigating rating scale category utility.,” Journal of outcome measurement, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 103–122, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. M. Smith, R. E. Schumacker, and M. J. Bush, “Using item mean squares to evaluate fit to the Rasch model,” Journal of Outcome Measurement, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 266–283, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. J. M. Linacre, A user's guide to WINSTEPS, Winsteps.com, Chicago, IL, 2005.
  33. E. C. Papanastasiou and R. Schumacker, “Rasch rating scale analysis of the Attitudes Toward Research Scale,” Journal of Applied Measurement, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 189–199, 2014. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. Tennant and P. G. Conaghan, “The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper?” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1358–1362, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. C. M. Fox and J. A. Jones, “Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology research,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 45, no. 1, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  36. J. Twiss, S. McKenna, L. Ganderton et al., “Psychometric performance of the CAMPHOR and SF-36 in pulmonary hypertension,” BMC Pulmonary Medicine, vol. 13, no. 45, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. I. Antonescu, F. Carli, N. Mayo, and L. Feldman, “Validation of the SF-36 as a measure of postoperative recovery after colorectal surgery,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 3168–3178, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  38. D. E. Stull, R. Wasiak, N. Kreif et al., “Validation of the SF-36 in patients with endometriosis,” Quality of Life Research, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 103–117, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. J. Liu, B. Qu, B. Hu, N. Jiang, and D. Wang, “The quality of life of men who have sex with men in China: Reliability and validity testing of the SF-36 questionnaire,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 12, Article ID e83362, 2013. View at Google Scholar