BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 1450828 | 9 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1450828

Protein Kinase G Induces an Immune Response in Cows Exposed to Mycobacterium avium Subsp. paratuberculosis

Academic Editor: Dimitrios P. Bogdanos
Received18 Sep 2017
Revised08 Dec 2017
Accepted19 Dec 2017
Published18 Jan 2018

Abstract

To establish infection, pathogens secrete virulence factors, such as protein kinases and phosphatases, to modulate the signal transduction pathways used by host cells to initiate immune response. The protein MAP3893c is annotated in the genome sequence of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP), the causative agent of Johne’s disease, as the serine/threonine protein kinase G (PknG). In this work, we report that PknG is a functional kinase that is secreted within macrophages at early stages of infection. The antigen is able to induce an immune response from cattle exposed to MAP in the form of interferon gamma production after stimulation of whole blood with PknG. These findings suggest that PknG may contribute to the pathogenesis of MAP by phosphorylating macrophage signalling and/or adaptor molecules as observed with other pathogenic mycobacterial species.

1. Introduction

Each year the dairy industry suffers significant economic losses from the infectious agent Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis (MAP) [1]. The bacterium causes cattle and other ruminants a fatal gastrointestinal disease known as Johne’s disease (JD). The National Animal Health Monitoring System estimates the prevalence of JD in US dairy herds at 68% [2]. Animals can remain asymptomatic for many years and shed large numbers of the bacteria in their faeces resulting in a transmission via faecal–oral route to many other cattle before the appearance of any clinical presentation in the herd [3].

In addition, the presence of MAP in dairy products [4, 5] represents a potential concern to human health. Recent advances in diagnostics have enabled the isolation of MAP from intestinal tissues [6], blood [7, 8], and breast milk [9] of Crohn’s disease (CD) patients. We have also observed higher antibody titers against PknG in CD patient sera, suggesting an early exposure or the presence of MAP in these patients [10]. Collectively, the association of MAP with CD patients, the reported clinical and pathological similarities in the gut of CD and JD, and their association with MAP [11] have led to the hypothesis that this bacteria may be an etiological agent for CD [12].

Currently, there is limited knowledge on the underlying mechanisms involved in MAP pathogenesis. MAP, as other pathogenic mycobacteria, is able to effectively block the immunological response of host macrophages, contributing to the bacterium’s ability to successfully survive and replicate inside these cells [13, 14]. The best characterized of the mycobacterial species is M. tuberculosis (Mtb), the bacterium responsible for tuberculosis. The genome of Mtb encodes for 11 serine/threonine protein kinases, nine of which are localized in the plasma membrane [15]. Of the remaining soluble proteins, protein kinase G (PknG) is important for the survival of Mtb in vivo [16]. With the vaccine strain Mycobacterium bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG), Walburger and colleagues observed PknG to be secreted within macrophage phagosomes and effectively inhibit phagosome–lysosome fusion leading to enhanced survival of the bacterium [17]. To date, this observation is limited to M. bovis BCG, although this kinase is suggested to play a similar role in the virulence of M. marinum [18]. In addition to its proposed contribution to pathogenicity, PknG has also been shown to have an intracellular catalytic activity, such as the regulation of the glutamate metabolism and the TCA cycle in Mtb [17, 19] and Corynebacterium glutamicum [20]. It is also plausible that the observed dependence of intracellular survival of pathogenic mycobacteria on PknG is due to its regulation of metabolic processes that may indirectly influence virulence. Recently, it has been shown that PknG mediates the adaptation of M. smegmatis and Mtb to acidic environments [21].

As MAP PknG shares close homology with Mtb and M. bovis BCG PknG it was of interest to biochemically characterize the enzyme and further verify its role in MAP pathogenesis. Previous work also identified PknG as contributing to the survival of the bacterium in bovine macrophages and calves; however, polar effects in this strain were not ruled out [22]. In the current study we demonstrate that MAP3893c, which is annotated in the MAP genome for PknG, encodes for a functional kinase that is secreted upon infection of human macrophage cells. Furthermore, PknG is able to induce an immune response in cattle exposed to MAP during early infection.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains, Cell Lines, Plasmid Construction, and Growth Conditions

pknG amplified from genomic MAP strain k-10 (ATCC BAA-968) was cloned into pET-30b using EcoRI and XhoI restriction sites using the forward primer 5′-ATAGAATTCAAAATGGCCGAGCCGGACAA, whereas 5′-ATACTCGAGTCAGAACGTGCTGGTGGG was used as a reverse primer. The plasmid was transformed into E. coli strain DH5α, and, once confirmed through sequencing, it was transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3) for protein production. Both E. coli strains were grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) broth supplemented with kanamycin (50μg/mL, Sigma). MAP was cultured in 7H9 medium (BD) supplemented with 0.05% Tween-80 (Sigma), 2 mg/L of Mycobactin J (Allied Monitor), and 10% oleic acid-albumin-dextrose-catalase (OADC, BD) and was grown in rolling bottles at 37°C.

The human-derived monocytic cell line, THP-1 (ATCC TIB-202), was chosen as a model for infection, which has been previously used by others to evaluate MAP infections [23, 24]. THP-1 cells were grown in RPMI 1640 (Sigma) supplemented with 1% L-glutamine (Stem Cell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), 100μg of streptomycin/mL and 100 U of penicillin/mL (Stem Cell Technologies), 0.1% amphotericin B (Fungizone, Invitrogen), and 10% foetal calf serum (FCS, Sigma). FCS (10%) and 1% L-glutamine supplemented RPMI medium was used for infecting THP-1 cells with MAP without the addition of penicillin, streptomycin, or amphotericin B.

The production of recombinant PknG is detailed in Supplementary Information (available here).

2.2. In Vitro Kinase Assay

The in vitro kinase reactions contained 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 5 mM MgCl2, 5 mM MnCl2, 1 mM DTT, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, 1μg PknG recombinant protein, and 1μg myelin basic protein (MBP, Sigma). Each reaction was initiated by the addition of 10μCi ofγ- (PerkinElmer) and was left at room temperature for 30 min. Following the incubation period, the reactions were stopped with sodium dodecyl sulphate- (SDS-) loading sample buffer and were boiled for 7 min at 95°C. The samples were resolved using a SDS-12% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-12% PAGE). 32P-labelled proteins were detected using a Phosphorimager SI (Molecular Dynamics).

2.3. THP-1 Cells Infection

Prior to infection, MAP cells were washed with 7H9 medium and labelled with 10μg of Rhodamine 6G (stock solution 1 mg/mL in DMSO, Sigma) dissolved in 1 mL of fresh 7H9 medium and rocked for 1 h at room temperature. For the negative control, 500μL of a stationary culture of MAP (OD600 = 0.98) was killed by adding 100μg/mL of kanamycin and was left rocking overnight at 37°C. Labelled live and killed cells were then washed repeatedly (×3) with Hank’s buffer (Sigma) and opsonized with 10% human AB+ serum (Gibco) for 30 min at 37°C [25]. Details about the cell infection are explained in Supplementary Information.

2.4. Immunostaining and Fluorescence Microscopy

THP-1 macrophages infected with MAP as mentioned earlier were processed as published [26]. The details of the protocol used in this experiment are in the Supplementary Information.

2.5. THP-1 Cell Lysate Immunoprecipitation

Preliminary experiments showed that the anti-Mtb PknG primary antibody detected MAP PknG using recombinant PknG as the control (data not shown). Immunoprecipitation was performed similarly to methods previous described [25] and explained in Supplementary Information.

2.6. Immunological Responses from Cattle

The animal ethics committee of the University of Prince Edward Island (PEI), Canada, approved all of the animal procedures used in this study. The cattle were sourced from three dairy farms on PEI. The farms were selected based on their JD history. One farm was known to have a moderate to high prevalence of JD, another farm was with no recorded history of clinical cases of JD, but a low prevalence of MAP infection, and the third farm was identified with greater than 8 years of negative antibody ELISA testing and no recorded cases of JD or MAP infection. Twenty animals were sampled from the high prevalence farm and 10 animals each from the low prevalence and JD-free farm. At sampling, whole blood and serum samples were collected along with a faecal sample from each animal. The serum sample was tested for MAP-specific antibodies using a commercially available kit (Institut Porquier, IDEXX) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The data are presented as S/P%, which was calculated as

Faecal samples were processed as described by VetAlert Johne’s Real-Time PCR kit (Tetracore), targeting the hspX gene as described previously [27].

Interferon gamma (IFN-γ) production specific to PknG was done on the whole blood sample. The blood from each animal was stimulated with 10μg/mL recombinant PknG antigen, which was endotoxin purified (High Capacity Endotoxin Removal Column, Pierce), purified protein derivative of MAP (PPDJ, USDA-National Veterinary Services Laboratories, Ames, Iowa) at 30μg/mL (antigen control), Pokeweed mitogen (PWM, Sigma) at 5μg/mL (positive control), and PBS (negative control). 225μL of blood was added to 25μL of each of the antigen, mitogen, or PBS. The stimulations were incubated in a humidified chamber at 35°C for approximately 24 h. After incubation, 100μL of the plasma was removed from each stimulation and frozen at −20°C until required. Assessment of IFN-γ concentration per sample was completed using a commercial sandwich ELISA (ID Screen Ruminant IFN-γ kit, IDVET, Montpellier, France) as previously described [27]. The data are presented as S/P% as described above.

2.7. Measurement of Specific PknG Antibodies

A standard ELISA was used to measure the levels of antibodies against PknG in animal sera using recombinant protein and following published protocols [10].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

Results were analyzed using a t-test analysis. Data was processed using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 (CA, USA). Results were considered significant when the value was <0.05.

3. Results

3.1. In Silico Analysis of PknG among Mycobacteria

Kinases are ubiquitously found in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells and play an essential role in signal transduction. These signalling proteins can be identified based on a conserved protein kinase domain. Among mycobacteria, a family of “eukaryotic-like” serine/threonine protein kinases exist [15], one of which is PknG. Using the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, we identified PknG to be conserved among mycobacteria with homologies indicated in Figure 1.

3.2. In Vitro PknG Expression and Enzymatic Activity

As the kinase activity of PknG was shown to be essential in blocking phagosome–lysosome fusion [17, 28], we were first interested in examining if MAP pknG encoded for a functional kinase. Consequently, recombinant MAP PknG was produced in E. coli BL21 and purified using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography. To determine if PknG is active, we conducted an in vitro kinase assay to assess PknG’s ability to phosphorylate the dephosphorylated myelin basic protein (MBP) used as a universal peptide substrate. As shown in Figure 2, in the presence of PknG, MBP was phosphorylated whereas MBP alone did not undergo autophosphorylation. These findings indicate that MAP PknG possesses in vitro kinase activity.

3.3. PknG Is Expressed and Secreted Ex Vivo

Recently, PknG was discovered as a substrate of the SecA2 secretion system in Mycobacterium marinum and the resulting phenotypical defects of a secA2 transposon mutant were observed to be similar to that described for the ΔpknG in other pathogenic mycobacteria [18]. Furthermore, the authors showed that the overexpression of PknG partially restored inhibition of phagosomal maturation in the secA2 mutant suggesting not only that PknG is able to be transported by the canonical Sec pathway, albeit with reduced efficiency, but also that PknG-mediated phagosomal maturation arrest is indeed dependent on its secretion. As a result, we further explored whether MAP secretes PknG ex vivo. First, we were interested in examining if PknG was indeed expressed during infection of THP-1 cells. As observed in Figure 2(b), we identified a protein corresponding to the molecular weight of PknG in both the lysate of the infected THP-1 cells and the positive control (MAP PknG recombinant protein). In contrast, the lysate obtained from noninfected THP-1 cells did not show any band corresponding to PknG, suggesting the protein is expressed during infection. The additional band of ~30 kDa observed in lane 5 appeared to be a self-cleavage of the protein with unknown activity as reported in a previous study [16].

Although our findings suggest that PknG is expressed by MAP in macrophages, it was of further interest to determine if the kinase is secreted by MAP and may be interfering with host signalling pathways and/or adaptor molecules. As a result we monitored colocalization of PknG at various time points during infection using epifluorescence microscopy. Immunostaining showed that both antibiotic-killed and live MAP cells were readily phagocytosed by the macrophages, as seen by the red fluorescently labelled bacteria (Figure 3). The secretion of PknG within macrophages is visualized by a green halo surrounding the yellow bacterium (red and green) in the overlapping image. The green fluorescence associated with PknG was only observed within macrophages hosting live bacteria, indicating that the presence of cytosolic PknG is dependent on active secretion by MAP rather than the result of bacterial lysis. Furthermore, visual comparison of the various time points of infection suggest that PknG secretion increased following the 24 h time point as the green halo surrounding the bacterium is greater in 48 h and 72 h images. Taken together, the data suggests that PknG expression is elevated at 48 h and remains stable at 72 h.

3.4. Immunological Responses from Cattle

If PknG is secreted within macrophage cytoplasm upon MAP infection, it is expected that cattle may have PknG-specific immunity as a result of the exogenous antigen presentation by the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II. This specific immunity can be measured by detection of specific antibodies or cytokines in blood after antigen stimulation [29, 30]. Thus, to assess whether lymphocytes have a memory response to PknG, we compared IFN-γ levels in cattle from high and low prevalence farms. As hypothesized, the production of IFN-γ in whole blood obtained from cattle stimulated with PknG had significantly elevated levels in herds from high prevalence farms compared to low prevalence and uninfected farms (Figure 4(a)). Interestingly, whole blood stimulated with the PPDJ antigen showed comparable levels of IFN-γ across all herds. Analysis of cattle further classified by PCR detection of MAP in faeces identified 11 positive (11/30, 37%) and 19 negative animals (19/30, 63%) from the high and low prevalence farms combined. Both PknG and PPDJ stimulated significantly greater IFN-γ production from the whole blood of MAP-shedding cattle than that of uninfected herds (Figure 4(b)). However, PCR negative cattle also exhibited levels of IFN-γ similar to PCR positive cattle suggesting that a number of PCR negative cattle have subclinical infection (Stage I or II of JD). To further support these findings, we observed that PknG antigen stimulated significantly more IFN-γ production in those deemed seropositive in comparison to those deemed seronegative (Figure 4(c)).

We further investigated PknG-specific antibody responses from sera collected of these same cattle and observed a significant difference between the MAP-exposed and the uninfected herds, where the MAP-exposed herds had more specific antibody (Figure 5(a)). Similar to our whole blood analysis, differentiating the animals from the exposed herd into faecal PCR and commercial ELISA (IDEXX) positive or negative cohorts indicated that there was no difference in PknG-specific antibody responses (Figure 5(b)). Again, these results may suggest that animals are in the initial stages of infection and may only be shedding MAP intermittently or generating inadequate levels of antibody in the blood.

4. Discussion

Mycobacteria, along with a number of other intracellular pathogens, can evade the antimicrobial responses of the host through the secretion of bacterial proteins, such as kinases and phosphatases [26, 31], that can modulate host intracellular signalling pathways. PknG in M. bovis is one such example and has been shown to prevent phagosome–lysosome fusion similar to its pathogenic mycobacterial counterparts [17]. However, little is known regarding the role of PknG in the pathogenicity of MAP. In the current study we demonstrated that the open reading frame MAP3893c, a homolog of PknG in mycobacteria, encodes for an active kinase that is secreted during infection.

The distribution of PknG in Actinomycetales has been already reported [32]. A number of studies have also shown that PknG plays a metabolic role in this order. Accumulation of the amino acids glutamine and glutamate was observed in a Mtb pknG knockout strain [16], and in later studies in C. glutamicum PknG was found to control the activity of the enzyme 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase by phosphorylating its substrate OdhI, a protein involved in glutamate synthesis [20]. In addition to its metabolic role in bacteria, PknG was also found to function as a virulence factor as observed by its secretion into the macrophage’s cytosol and ability to block phagosome–lysosome fusion [17]. As a result of these findings in M. bovis, we hypothesized that PknG may play a similar role in the pathogenicity of MAP. In this work, we show that MAP PknG, similar to M. bovis-PknG, is secreted during infection as the protein was detected using immunoprecipitation in the lysate extracts of THP-1 cells infected with MAP.

Analysis of PknG secretion in live bacterium-infected macrophages showed secretion at 24 h followed by a concomitant increase in fluorescence intensity during the full course of the experiment (72 h). Other groups have previously shown that PknG expression in pathogenic mycobacteria is induced by the intracellular environment of the macrophage [17] and further increases at 48 h and 110 h after infection [18]. Despite the essential role for PknG in the survival of M. bovis, little remains known as to its secretion mechanism and host substrates. Recently the M. marinum SecA2 secretion system was found to be responsible for the secretion of PknG into the intraphagosomal environment and the SecA2 mutant displayed similar defects to that described for the pknG knockout strain [18]. To date, no other secretion systems have been described and it remains plausible that MAP uses a similar mechanism.

Walburger et al. observed that the kinase activity of PknG is essential for its ability to prevent phagosome–lysosome fusion [17]. Thus to ensure that PknG was enzymatically active, we analyzed the protein’s phosphorylation activity using an in vitro kinase assay. The results for the experiment showed that MAP3983c encodes for a functional kinase, as it was able to phosphorylate the universal kinase substrate, MBP. Although no other studies have shown MAP3983c to exhibit kinase activity, these findings were expected as the protein shares high homology with PknG in M. bovis and Mtb. Thus, our results suggest that PknG has the potential to interfere with host signalling pathways in a similar fashion to M. bovis.

The whole blood responses to the PknG antigen were different to those observed with PPDJ, as animals with no faecal shedding or those seronegative for MAP responded similarly to PknG as positive animals. These findings indicate that the observed immunological response to PPDJ is the result of the cattle’s exposure to MAP rather than the presence of an active infection. The levels of antibodies against PknG measured using a serum ELISA support this statement. However, further evaluation is necessary due to the bimodal immune response to MAP infection. The onset of MAP infection includes a cell-mediated response, which is characterized by the release of proinflammatory mediators, such as IFN-γ (1 response), and slowly increasing amounts of MAP-specific antibodies from B cells [3335]. As the infection progresses high levels of antibodies are produced [36], but a shift to a chronic disease state results in progressive T cell exhaustion characterized by immunological dysfunction and improper control of the disease [36, 37]. Similar evidence exists in animals where a chronic MAP infection leads to anergy [36]. It is worth mentioning that MAP may also regulate regulatory T cell populations [38], as a decrease of their activity has been recently reported in ileal lesions associated with JD [39].

In conclusion, PknG is an enzymatically active kinase that is secreted during macrophage infection. The combination of these findings suggests that PknG may similarly confer intracellular survival to the pathogen by preventing phagosome–lysosome fusion. From our work and others it is of interest to further investigate PknG as a drug target [32, 40] and biomarker for serological testing. Future research should focus on identifying host substrate(s) of PknG, which would likely identify the corresponding signal transduction pathways modulated by this interaction and clarify the role of PknG in mycobacterial physiology and pathogenesis.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Natasha Robinson and Dr. Shawn McKenna for technical support.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary information about a description of materials and methods accompanying this study. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. R. L. Smith, Y. T. Grohn, A. K. Pradhan et al., “A longitudinal study on the impact of Johne's disease status on milk production in individual cows,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 2653–2661, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Johne’s disease on U.S. dairies, 1991-2007, (2008).
  3. R. W. Sweeney, “Transmission of paratuberculosis.,” Veterinary Clinics of North America: Food Animal Practice, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 305–312, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. L. E. Ellingson, J. L. Anderson, J. J. Koziczkowski et al., “Detection of viable Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in retail pasteurized whole milk by two culture methods and PCR,” Journal of Food Protection, vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 966–972, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. I. Abubakar, D. Myhill, S. H. Aliyu, and P. R. Hunter, “Detection of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratubercubsis from patients with Crohn's disease using nucleic acid-based techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 401–410, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. L. A. Sechi, M. Mura, F. Tanda et al., “Identification of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in biopsy specimens from patients with Crohns disease identified by in situ hybridization,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 4514–4517, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. A. Naser, G. Ghobrial, C. Romero, and J. F. Valentine, “Culture of Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis from the blood of patients with Crohn's disease,” The Lancet, vol. 364, no. 9439, pp. 1039–1044, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. A. Juste, N. Elguezabal, J. M. Garrido et al., “On the prevalence of M. avium subspecies paratuberculosis DNA in the blood of healthy individuals and patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 7, Article ID e2537, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. A. Naser, D. Schwartz, and I. Shafran, “Isolation of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis from breast milk of Crohn's disease patients,” American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 1094-1095, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. H. Bach, H. H. Ko, E. A. Raizman et al., “Immunogenicity of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis proteins in Crohn's disease patients,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 30–39, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. M. Scanu, T. J. Bull, S. Cannas et al., “Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis infection in cases of irritable bowel syndrome and comparison with Crohn's disease and Johne's disease: Common neural and immune pathogenicities,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. 3883–3890, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. M. Feller, K. Huwiler, R. Stephan et al., “Mycobacterium avium subspecies paratuberculosis and Crohn's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Lancet Infectious Diseases, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 607–613, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. P. Kuehnel, R. Goethe, A. Habermann et al., “Characterization of the intracellular survival of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis: phagosomal pH and fusogenicity in J774 macrophages compared with other mycobacteria,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 551–566, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. S.-R. Woo, J. A. Heintz, R. Albrecht, R. G. Barletta, and C. J. Czuprynski, “Life and death in bovine monocytes: The fate of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 106–113, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. Y. Av-Gay and M. Everett, “The eukaryotic-like Ser/Thr protein kinases of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Trends in Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 238–244, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. S. Cowley, M. Ko, N. Pick et al., “The Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein serine/threonine kinase PknG is linked to cellular glutamate/glutamine levels and is important for growth in vivo,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 1691–1702, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. A. Walburger, A. Koul, G. Ferrari et al., “Protein kinase G from pathogenic mycobacteria promotes survival within macrophages,” Science, vol. 304, no. 5678, pp. 1800–1804, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. D. van der Woude, E. J. M. Stoop, M. Stiess et al., “Analysis of secA2-dependent substrates in mycobacterium marinum identifies protein kinase G (PknG) as a virulence effector,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 280–295, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H. M. O'Hare, R. Durán, C. Cerveñansky et al., “Regulation of glutamate metabolism by protein kinases in mycobacteria,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1408–1423, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Niebisch, A. Kabus, C. Schultz, B. Weil, and M. Bott, “Corynebacterial protein kinase G controls 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase activity via the phosphorylation status of the OdhI protein,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 281, no. 18, pp. 12300–12307, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. Paroha, R. Chourasia, R. Mondal, and S. K. Chaurasiya, “PknG supports mycobacterial adaptation in acidic environment,” Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, pp. 1–12, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. K. T. Park, A. J. Allen, J. P. Bannantine et al., “Evaluation of two mutants of Mycobacterium avium subsp. Paratuberculosis as candidates for a live attenuated vaccine for Johne's disease,” Vaccine, vol. 29, no. 29-30, pp. 4709–4719, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. D. A. Keown, D. A. Collings, and J. I. Keenana, “Uptake and persistence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in human monocytes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 80, no. 11, pp. 3768–3775, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. A. Cossu, L. A. Sechi, S. Zanetti, and V. Rosu, “Gene expression profiling of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in simulated multi-stress conditions and within THP-1 cells reveals a new kind of interactive intramacrophage behaviour,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 12, article no. 87, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. Bach, J. Sun, Z. Hmama, and Y. Av-Gay, “Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis PtpA is an endogenous tyrosine phosphatase secreted during infection,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 12, pp. 6540–6546, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. H. Bach, K. G. Papavinasasundaram, D. Wong, Z. Hmama, and Y. Av-Gay, “Mycobacterium tuberculosis Virulence Is Mediated by PtpA Dephosphorylation of Human Vacuolar Protein Sorting 33B,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 316–322, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. E. L. Laurin, J. Sanchez, M. Chaffer, S. L. B. McKenna, and G. P. Keefe, “Assessment of the relative sensitivity of milk ELISA for detection of Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis infectious dairy cows,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 598–607, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. Scherr, S. Honnappa, G. Kunz et al., “Structural basis for the specific inhibition of protein kinase G, a virulence factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 29, pp. 12151–12156, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. J. R. Stabel, “Production of γ-interferon by peripheral blood mononuclear cells: An important diagnostic tool for detection of subclinical paratuberculosis,” Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 345–350, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. C. Burrells, C. J. Clarke, A. Colston et al., “Interferon-gamma and interleukin-2 release by lymphocytes derived from the blood, mesenteric lymph nodes and intestines of normal sheep and those affected with paratuberculosis (Johne's disease),” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 68, no. 2-4, pp. 139–148, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. Y. Fu and J. E. Galán, “The Salmonella typhimurium tyrosine phosphatase SptP is translocated into host cells and disrupts the actin cytoskeleton,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 359–368, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Gil, M. Graña, F. J. Schopfer et al., “Inhibition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis PknG by non-catalytic rubredoxin domain specific modification: Reaction of an electrophilic nitro-fatty acid with the Fe-S center,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 65, pp. 150–161, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. M. Coussens, C. J. Colvin, K. Wiersma, A. Abouzied, and S. Sipkovsky, “Gene expression profiling of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from cattle infected with Mycobacterium paratuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 5494–5502, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Mikkelsen, G. Jungersen, and S. S. Nielsen, “Association between milk antibody and interferon-gamma responses in cattle from Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infected herds,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 127, no. 3-4, pp. 235–241, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. P. M. Coussens, N. Verman, M. A. Coussens, M. D. Elftman, and A. M. McNulty, “Cytokine Gene Expression in Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and Tissues of Cattle Infected with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis: Evidence for An Inherent Proinflammatory Gene Expression Pattern,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 1409–1422, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. E. O. E. Bassey and M. T. Collins, “Study of T-lymphocyte subsets of healthy and Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis-Infected cattle,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 65, no. 11, pp. 4869–4872, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  37. E. J. Wherry, “T cell exhaustion,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 492–499, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Belkaid and B. T. Rouse, “Natural regulatory T cells in infectious disease,” Nature Immunology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 353–360, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. A. Roussey, L. J. Oliveira, I. M. Langohr, D. G. Sledge, and P. M. Coussens, “Regulatory T cells and immune profiling in johne's disease lesions,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 181, pp. 39–50, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. M.-N. Lisa, M. Gil, G. André-Leroux et al., “Molecular Basis of the Activity and the Regulation of the Eukaryotic-like S/T Protein Kinase PknG from Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Structure, vol. 23, no. 6, article no. 3155, pp. 1039–1048, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Horacio Bach et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1009 Views | 582 Downloads | 5 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.