BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 1642684 | 10 pages |

Using Zebrafish for Investigating the Molecular Mechanisms of Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity

Academic Editor: Isabelle Chevalot
Received15 Apr 2018
Revised31 Jul 2018
Accepted18 Aug 2018
Published27 Sep 2018


Over the last decade, the zebrafish (Danio rerio) has emerged as a model organism for cardiovascular research. Zebrafish have several advantages over mammalian models. For instance, the experimental cost of using zebrafish is comparatively low; the embryos are transparent, develop externally, and have high fecundity making them suitable for large-scale genetic screening. More recently, zebrafish embryos have been used for the screening of a variety of toxic agents, particularly for cardiotoxicity testing. Zebrafish has been shown to exhibit physiological responses that are similar to mammals after exposure to medicinal drugs including xenobiotics, hormones, cancer drugs, and also environmental pollutants, including pesticides and heavy metals. In this review, we provided a summary for recent studies that have used zebrafish to investigate the molecular mechanisms of drug-induced cardiotoxicity. More specifically, we focused on the techniques that were exploited by us and others for cardiovascular toxicity assessment and described several microscopic imaging and analysis protocols that are being used for the estimation of a variety of cardiac hemodynamic parameters.

1. Introduction

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) is a small tropical fish, native to Southeast Asia and belongs to the minnow family (Cyprinidae) of order Cypriniformes [1]. Over the last 30 years, zebrafish has emerged as a model for studying a variety of human disease development [2]. The zebrafish genome is fully sequenced and its resemblance to human genome is surprisingly high with 87% similarity [3]. It is estimated that 70% of the human genes have orthologue genes in the zebrafish genome [1, 4]. As a result, many genes that are associated with human diseases exist in zebrafish and mutations observed in human patients can be modelled in this animal. The high conservation of zebrafish gene sequence and functions compared to humans further demonstrates how zebrafish can be used to model human diseases including cardiovascular conditions [3]. Besides high gene conservation, the utilization of zebrafish as a model to study cardiovascular development and related disease offers a variety of advantages including optical transparency, rapid cardiovascular development, and a cheaper cost when compared to other in vivo models [5].

In addition to investigating gene function and modelling a variety of human disease, zebrafish embryos have been extensively used to study cardiotoxicity [6]. Cardiotoxicity is defined as the toxicity that damages the heart muscle and other cardiac tissues and/or disrupts the electrophysiology of the heart. As a result of cardiotoxicity, the heart may not be able to pump adequate blood throughout the body [7]. If severe, cardiotoxicity may lead to cardiomyopathy in other terms cardiac muscle dysfunction. Cardiotoxicity might occur as a side effect of chemotherapeutical drugs or might develop due to exposure to certain chemicals. Lately, zebrafish embryos were shown to be very useful in toxicology studies, particularly to screen for developmental toxicants [8, 9] and environmental pollutants such as pesticides and heavy metals as well as nanoparticles [10, 11]. Small molecules can be added directly into the fish water within multiwell plates and absorbed via diffusion by the fish. Alternatively, studied agents can be injected directly into the yolk sac [1215]. Zebrafish is an inexpensive/high throughput experimental model that offers several benefits that include the following: the quantity of the tested agents is reduced; the duration of the experiments is shorter; and technical expertise required for its evaluation is less intensive than that of an equivalent study performed in the traditional animal model, mice [1618]. Furthermore, chemical libraries can be applied to a large number of embryos to systematically screen for a phenotype of interest.

Drug-induced cardiotoxicity is a leading factor for drug withdrawals from the market and failure of clinical trials. The major factor for this drug attrition is lack of efficacy or drug safety [1921]. Nowadays, the costs of bringing new drugs to the market are very expensive and are continually increasing. The costs are estimated to be higher than one billion USD per drug [22]. Unexpectedly, this increase in costs does not correlate well with an increased success rate in approving new drugs. Only 10 % of drugs entering phase 1 trial get approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [19, 23]. To reduce the large cost of drug development, there is a need to identify potential adverse drug responses (ADR) as early as possible before entering clinical trials. Academic and pharmaceutical industry researchers are showing an increasing interest in the zebrafish model. Zebrafish is a model that bridges cell culture assays (cost-effective but poor data content) and mammalian models (expensive but high data content) during the preclinical pipeline. The toxicity effects reported from zebrafish-based experiments are considered representative for higher vertebrates including humans. Thus, its use provides a closer scenario to human biology than in vitro systems.

In this review, we present the important findings from recent studies that have exploited zebrafish in cardiotoxicity assays. We first explain the basics of heart development in zebrafish and the structure of the cardiovascular system in zebrafish. The following section will discuss the zebrafish cardiotoxicity assays. The last section will involve findings from drug-induced cardiotoxicity and environmental teratogen agent-induced cardiotoxicity. Furthermore, analyzing abnormal cardiac morphologies, and disturbed blood circulation in response to drugs will be highlighted.

2. Heart Development and Cardiovascular Structure in Zebrafish

In zebrafish, the heart is located anteroventrally to the thoracic cavity between the operculum and the pectoral girdles [27]. The heart is contained in a silver-coloured membranous sac, known as the pericardium. More specifically, within the pericardium, there are four distinct chambers that comprise the heart: the sinus venosus, the atrium, the ventricle, and the outflow tract, called the bulbus arteriosus. However, the fish heart is often referred to as being two-chambered, with one atrium and one ventricle. Heart development starts very early in zebrafish development [28]. At just 5 hours postfertilization (hpf), cardiac progenitors (identified by fate-mapping experiments) are present in the lateral marginal zones of the cleavage stage embryo [29]. Following the gastrulation, cells from the anterior lateral plate mesoderm migrate towards the midline and differentiate into ventricular and atrial cardiomyocytes [29]. Heart tube formation occurs around 24-hpf (Figure 1), at which point the embryo is still translucent, and visualization of ongoing development is possible [30]. At 24-hpf, the heart tube starts to elongate and bends so that the ventricle becomes anterior and the atrium becomes posterior [29]. At this stage, a beating linear heart tube has been formed to propel circulation throughout the body. This movement precedes the looping of the heart, ballooning of the chambers, and formation of the atrioventricular canal. Looping ends around 48-hpf [29]. At 48-hpf, the heart consists of a sinus venosus (the inflow tract that collects blood from cardinal veins and delivers it to the atrium), one atrium (a muscled cavity that receives deoxygenated blood and delivers it to the ventricle), and one ventricle (receives blood from the atrium and delivers it to the body via the aorta). During this time, the bulbus arteriosus (a pear-shaped chamber through which the blood leaves the heart) develops [31, 32]. While the heart is forming, cells are rearranging and beginning to communicate in a way that enables them to begin to pump blood through the heart via contraction. Major morphological events, heart developmental stages, and genes governing heart development in zebrafish are summarized in Figure 1.

3. Cardiotoxicity Evaluation in Zebrafish

3.1. Cardiac Function Assessment

Zebrafish embryo is a commonly used animal model to investigate the teratogenic effects of the drugs. For this purpose, the cardiovascular function of the animals needs to be evaluated to reveal the influence of exposure on the development of the cardiovascular system as well as on the growth of the whole animal. Simple assays that measure the heart rate currently lack specificity. As such, a more direct evaluation of the cardiac hemodynamic events is critical when zebrafish is used as a robust tool in investigating drug-induced cardiotoxicity. Here we describe microscopy imaging and analysis protocols utilized to calculate a variety of hemodynamic parameters for zebrafish embryos exposed to clinical drugs.

Testing teratogenicity of clinical drugs involves exposing zebrafish embryos to desired concentrations. Due to small size of the embryos, multiple well plates can be used making it possible to test a high number of animals simultaneously [12, 13, 33]. Drug exposure usually begins around 5-hpf, corresponding to late blastula/early gastrula stages and ends at 96-hpf, where most organs are fully developed [34]. In addition to analyzing organ morphologies, blood circulation (hemodynamics) in the exposed animals can also be investigated [35]. Such hemodynamic evaluation enables revealing whether the tested drug affects the whole cardiovascular system, which in turn might affect the development of other systems. For hemodynamic evaluation, the most calculated parameters are heartbeat, cardiac output, fractional area change, fractional shortening, and vascular blood flow velocities [36]. These evaluations can be done by analyzing the embryos under an inverted or a stereo brightfield microscope [37]. In more advanced applications, novel techniques like computational fluid dynamics or particle image velocimetry can also be used for detailed hemodynamic analysis [38, 39].

The functional analysis involves quantification of the pumping efficiency of the heart, whereas structural analysis involves precise measurement of heart chamber sizes. These efforts necessitate the utilization of advanced fast imaging techniques like time-lapse microscopy, fluorescent microscopy, and micro-computed tomography. Determination of ventricular wall speeds is important for modelling cardiac muscle conditions such as cardiomyopathy on zebrafish. Levels of wall velocities are about 200–300 µm/sec for 2 to 5 days postfaveolization (dpf) embryos [37]. Therefore, movies should be recorded at high speeds and image analysis is performed on these videos to find ventricular wall speeds and heart rate. Alternatively, a variety of software application can be used to extract the heart rate from beating heart recordings automatically. The first commercially available zebrafish tracking equipment was the ZebraBox/ZebraLab (ViewPoint, France). The system consists of a box with an infrared light source and a camera and it is capable of recording movies with 100 frames per second. The ZebraLab software controls the box and analyzes the swimming activity of the larvae. The infrared light source allows for behavioural monitoring in the dark, as the fish cannot see infrared light [40]. Initially our laboratory used the ZebraBox to analyze larval behaviour, measuring swimming distance, and velocity. However, that initial version of ZebraLab had very limited flexibility with respect to off line data analysis and did not permit analysis of externally recorded movies of zebrafish movement. Current versions of the ZebraBox and the software have been significantly upgraded. The system now has a fully flexible software platform and is capable of analyzing recorded data retrospectively. The aim of the software is to provide information on several cardiac parameters including the heartbeat, blood flow, and vessel diameter variations from a zebrafish high speed video. To evaluate the blood flow, the algorithm determines the correlation between two successive frames (Figure 2). The displacement between the current frame and the best correlated area in the next frame represent the global movement of the blood cells. The heart beat is evaluated by measuring the number of oscillations of the blood flow. To perform the best evaluation, there is an automatic detection of the local minimal value of the first and the last oscillation in the blood flow axis. These values are represented by a black star in the blood flow axis [41]. Determination of cell speed is important for evaluating flow rate for the vessels and estimating the shear stress levels acting on the endothelial cells lining the vessel wall (i.e., shear stress is the frictional force on the endothelial cells from the flowing blood). Levels of red blood cell (RBC) velocities are about 300 µm/sec to 750 µm/sec for 2-5 dpf embryos [42]. Therefore, movies should be recorded at high speeds for further analysis.

In 2010, Noldus introduced the DanioVison system (Noldus Information Technology, NL), which consists of the DanioVison chamber for recording the behaviour of larval zebrafish, and the software platform, EthoVision XT9.0, for analyzing the data. EthoVision has a flexible data analysis module, and separately acquired movies can be loaded into the software enabling automated analysis of larvae and adult zebrafish behaviour. Noldus introduced a wide range of tools for all kinds of behavioural tests for zebrafish. The software is used to measure the activity, heartbeat, morphology and flow in embryos and larvae while the video tracking is designed to analyze the movement of adults in several learning, anxiety, or social behaviour paradigms (Figure 3).

Zcardio® (ZeClinics, Spain) has such applications. For example, Zcardio is developed for myocardial fluorescent fish and the software enables for the detection of the following dysfunctions: beat frequency (ventricle and atrium), arrhythmias, QT & QTc interval, fibrillation, ejection fraction, vein blood flow velocity, artery blood flow velocity, and cardiac arrest [43, 44].

3.2. Molecular Assessment of Cardiotoxicity

Gene expression profiling may aid in the extrapolation of compound-induced effects for cardiotoxicity investigation, because of the conservation of the molecular pathways and mechanisms between zebrafish and human. In addition to its utility in screening, zebrafish chemical genetics can also help analyze the target and mechanism of action of a test compound through chemical rescue experiments, knockdowns, and phenotype comparisons. Zebrafish are uniquely qualified for use in large-scale screening and the availability of numerous genetic tools facilitates the detailed study of candidate drug effects in vivo [32, 45], prior to preclinical testing in mammalian models. The zebrafish chemical genetic screen is a time and cost-effective method for direct in vivo drug discovery and serves as an advanced system in drug development [46]. Zebrafish gene expression can be analyzed using tools such as quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) [47] and in situ hybridization [48]. RNA extraction, followed by RNA microarray analysis is available for gene expression profiling [49]. Western blot and immunohistochemistry can determine the protein expression profiles. Examples of genes or markers (Cardiotoxic genes/proteins) that are screened in cardiotoxicity studies include SLC28A3, RARG, and UGT1A6 [50]. Genetic variants in other genes include the following: ABCC1,2,5 CBR3, CAT, RAC2, HAS3, NCF4, GSTP1, SULT2B1, ABCB1,4, POR, HFE, HAS3, SCL22A17 and NOS3 [51, 52]

4. Zebrafish Cardiotoxicity Studies

The zebrafish embryo has been used to assess the impact of exposure of environmental pollutants including Dioxins, PAHs, PBDEs, AChEIs, as well as nanoparticles [53] alcohols [54, 55], and recreational drugs such as Cocaine [56], or Cigarette smoke [57] on the cardiovascular system. Soanes et al. studied the effect of different products of cigarettes on 24 to 48-hpf zebrafish embryos [57]. It was found that zebrafish heartbeat was reduced by 50% at 48-hpf after being exposed to cigarettes [57]. Moreover, continual alcohol exposure (until 2-3 dpf) has been shown to alter the heart of zebrafish functionally and morphologically [58].

Zebrafish was also utilized as a model to assess the cardiotoxicity of several clinical drugs. For instant, cardiotoxicity evaluation of anti-cancer drugs is frequently performed in zebrafish [59]. Cancer patients usually suffer the complications of chemotherapy due to its cardiotoxic effect [55]. Cardiotoxicity has been linked to the morbidity and mortality of cancer patients [6062], that being said, it can be minimized by accurately identifying the high-risk patients. Identification of patients at high risk can be accomplished through the discovery of new biomarkers. Existing screening methods do not give sufficient results to aid in disease prognosis. In the process of treating cancer with chemotherapy, the cardiological conditions must be considered [63]; this is absent in the current guidelines for cancer treatment. Mostly, chemotherapeutic agents have significant side effects on cardiovascular system which can be prevented by identifying new compounds such as antioxidants and endothelial- or cardiomyocyte-protective agents [60]. Below we explain current findings for the cardiotoxicities of tested agents on zebrafish [64].

4.1. Clinical Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity

One of the widely used anticancer drugs belongs to the Anthracyclines (ANTs) class; Daunorubicin, Pirarubicin, Doxorubicin (DOX), Epirubicin, and DOX-liposome. Han et al. exposed zebrafish embryos to a variety of ANTs that resulted in incomplete looping of the heart tube, pericardial edema and bradycardia in dose-dependent manner [25]. The greatest defect was produced by DOX, whereas Daunorubicin produced the minimum toxicity. ANTs have been shown to downregulate the genes and protein expression related to cardiac development. The ANTs’ cardiotoxic effect in the zebrafish model were similar to that reported in other mammalian models [25, 55].

Zhu, et al. showed that zebrafish exhibited pericardial edema and circulatory disturbance in response to cardiotoxic drugs [26]. Seven known human cardiotoxic drugs were tested in the zebrafish model. These included aspirin, clomipramine hydrochloride, cyclophosphamide, nimodipine, quinidine, terfenadine, and verapamil hydrochloride [65]. Aspirin is known to known to elevate the heart rate, and other drugs are known to cause bradycardia. Drugs were administered via soaking or yolk sac microinjection. After 4 and 24 h post-drug treatment, the cardiotoxicity was assessed based on six cardiac parameters: heart rate, heart rhythm, pericardial edema, circulation, hemorrhage, and thrombosis. Evaluation of the effect of human drugs on zebrafish heart led to the conclusion that the effect of these drugs on human and zebrafish are comparable which validated the zebrafish as an excellent model for studying the drug cardiotoxicity [65].

Furthermore, Louis J. D’Amico et al. described methods that are used on the zebrafish for evaluating drug-induced cardiotoxicity [60, 66]. Several drugs from different categories (vancer drugs, antiarrhythmic, anticonvulsant, and beta-blockers) are known to affect the heart function in patients were tested. These drugs included 5-fluorouracil and mitoxantrone, as well as above metnioned drugs; DOX, Cyclophosphamide terfenadine. Drug concentrations ranging from 0.01 µM to 1000 µM were administered to 2 dpf zebrafish embryos for 24 hr. The cardiotoxicity was assessed by measuring the heart rate, heart rhythm, circulation and morphological changes. This study showed similar results as previous [25, 65]; DOX and Cyclophosphamide caused bradycardia while Terfenadine and Clomipramine, which are known to cause a prolongation in QT interval in human [67], induced pericardial edema and hemorrhage in zebrafish. Antibiotics and antiviral drugs such as Gentamicin, Amantadine and Tetracycline rarely induce cardiotoxic effect in humans. These are usually used as a negative control in zebrafish cardiotoxicity studies [68], and as expected they did not induce any cardiac effect in zebrafish [66]. The results were conclusive in employing the zebrafish model for studying drug-induced cardiotoxicity [69, 70]. Table 1 summarizes some findings from this study [66].

DrugEffect on humanEffect on zebrafish

Doxorubicin [25] 5-fluorouracil Terfenadine [26]
Cardiomyopathy, arrhythmia, negative inotropic effects (affect the muscle contraction), or QT prolongation.Bradycardia, Acute atrioventricular block (AV block), Slow circulation

Clomipramine [26]QT prolongationPericardial edema, hemorrhage, bradycardia, and death at higher concentrations

Quinidine QT prolongationAV block

Metoprolol [26]BradycardiaPericardial edema
Mexiletine Decreased heart rateDecreased heart rate

Additionally, Cheng et al. assessed the cardiotoxicity of some kinase inhibitors that are used clinically in cancer treatment in zebrafish. The kinase inhibitor, Sorafenib, has been associated with significant declines in ejection fraction in 13% of treated patients [71]. Zebrafish Sorafenib exposure was compared to two kinase inhibitors, Sunitinib that is known to possess cardiotoxic effect and Gefitinib that has no cardiotoxic effect. Zebrafish treatment with Sorafenib and Sunitinib at 5 mol/L induced cardiotoxicity evident by cardiac impairment that was presented with pericardial edema and reduced contractile function. Gefitinib did not result in cardiotoxicity

Moreover, Fang et al. assessed the cardiotoxicity of three addictive drugs, Methamphetamine, Ketamine, and Methadone, in zebrafish embryos [72]. Exposure to 1000 mg/L of Methamphetamine for 12 hours resulted in cardiotoxicity evident with pericardial edema, cardiac looping defects and decreased heart rate in zebrafish. Treatment with the same dose of Ketamine resulted in decreased heart rate. Interestingly, Methadone was lethal at 500 mg/L, while treatment with 100 mg/L resulted in severe circulation abnormalities and pericardial edema. According to these results, Methadone is the most cardiotoxic agents among the three. Based on this data, it was suggestive to advise the clinicians to periodically check the cardiac function of patients treated with these drugs [72].

A study was performed by Cornet et al. to test the toxicity of 24 drugs on zebrafish embryos [24]. Embryos treated with 10 µM haloperidol, known to be cardiotoxic in zebrafish and humans [73], for 4 hrs, were considered as positive controls. Videos were taken under a microscope and ZeCardio® software (ZeClinics) was used to extract different cardiac parameters; heart rate, cardiac arrest, QTc prolongation, and ejection fraction (EJF). Eight compounds out of the twenty four (i.e., haloperidol, cisapride, docetaxel, dofetilide, pindolol, riluzole, trifluoperazine HCL, and vincristine), showed a decrease in the heart rate (bradycardia) and promoted cardiac arrests. In contrast, zebrafish embryos treated with ciprofloxacin and d-glucose showed increased heart rates but no change in the cardiac arrest. Prolongation in the QTc interval was observed in larvae treated with haloperidol and pindolol. However, a shorter QTc interval was observed in the embryos treated with ciprofloxacin and d-glucose. Figure 4 represents the findings from the study.

Finally, diethyl-aminobenzaldehyde (DEAB) is a drug that we use as a positive control in the toxicological studies in our zebrafish lab at Qatar University Biomedical Research Center. Embryos were incubated from 24-hpf to 96-hpf with 10 μM and 100 μM of DEAB. Figure 5, shows some cardiological and teratogenic effects after exposure to DEAB.

4.2. Cardiotoxic Nanoparticles

Nanotechnology is a multi-trillion-dollar business sector that has an increasing impact on the industrial revolution. Nanoparticles have great potential to be used as drug carriers against human diseases. Zebrafish has been proposed as one of the most successful model and notable advancement in nanotoxicological studies [74]. For instance, at high concentration, gold and silver nanoparticles were shown to change the cardiac morphology in zebrafish [55]. One study has assessed the cardiotoxicity effect of silica nanoparticles using the zebrafish model [75]. Silica nanoparticles have gained great interest for its extensive applications including medical diagnostics, drug delivery and gene therapy [75]. Zebrafish embryos were exposed to silica nanoparticles for continuing exposure period (24 - 96 hpf) to assess the toxicity of silica nanoparticles (embryonic mortality and malformation, cellular death assay). Heart rate was measured at 24 and 48-hpf; significant bradycardia was reported with embryos treated with 100 and 200 μg/mL concentrations compared to lower concentrations of silica nanoparticles and the negative control. In addition to the heart rate measurement, the expression of cardiovascular-related proteins by western blot analysis was used as another approach to assess the cardiotoxic effect of silica nanoparticles. Exposure of the embryos to silica nanoparticles did not cause any significant change in vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2). In contrast, phosphorylated VEGFR2 and angiogenesis-related ERK1/2 expression were inhibited in a dose-dependent manner. Moreover, phosphorylated ERK1/2 expression was inhibited completely. However, no significant changes were observed in ERK1/2, MEF2C/ NKX2.5, and β-actin.

Chitosan is a well-known biopolymer that has a wide range of applications including growth inhibition of wide varieties of bacteria and spoilage microorganisms [76]. Recently, our group has shown that chitosan zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticles (90% chitosan: 10% ZnO) has inhibitory effect on sulfur reducing bacteria. In the same study and using zebrafish, we showed that these nanoparticles were generally “Green” [77]. In other words, according to Acute Toxicity Rating Scale by Fish and Wildlife Service, Chitosan zinc oxide nanoparticles were regarded as practically nontoxic with LC50 more than 100 µg/mL [78]. The cardiotoxic effects of two nanoparticles were also tested in our zebrafish lab (unpublished results). In these studies, we used Tg[cmlc:GFP] transgenic AB strain, expressing GFP in their cardiac myocyte, to allow good quality of cardiac imaging for heart function assessment. At 96-hpf, we incubated the embryos for 4 hrs. at 28.5°C with (i) the negative control 0.1% DMSO (ii) the positive control 10 µM haloperidol, (iii) 200 µg/mL ChNP, and (iv) 200 µg/mL CZNC. Embryos were then anesthetized by immersion in 0.7 µM Tricaine methanesulfonate and positioned under the microscope to record the videos. We measured the time length of ventricle beat, atrial and ventricular fibrillation, cardiac arrest, ejection fraction [(Ef %) = ((DD-SD)/DD) x100]; DD is the ventricle diastolic diameter (max dilatation); SD is the ventricle systolic diameter (max contraction). For calculation of the QTc interval (linearly corrected QT interval), the Framingham formula (QTc = QT + 0.154 (1 − RR)) was adjusted for zebrafish as QTc = QT + 0.154 (2.66 − RR). RR = 6.6 ms/measured bpm is applied embryos treated with haloperidol showed significant bradycardia and a significant increase in the cardiac arrest compared to the negative control. In contrast, haloperidol-treated embryos showed no significant effect on the ejection fraction, which is expected as there is no evidence in the literature showing that haloperidol causes any significant difference on the ejection fraction. Moreover, embryos treated with haloperidol showed significant Arrhythmia, which was indicated by increase in the percentage of beats defect on the atrium and ventricle compared to the negative control. On the other hand, embryos treated with ChNP and CZNCs showed no significant changes on the heart beats, ejection fraction, percentage of beats defect and cardiac arrest compared to the negative control.

5. Conclusions and Future Directions

Because of the conservation between zebrafish and human cardiogenesis, as well as the other advantages such as cost, rapid development, transparency, simple maintenance/egg collection, and ability for survival without a fully functional cardiovascular system, zebrafish became a common model system for cardiovascular disease. As summarized in the previous section, zebrafish models also play a key role in testing different drug cardiotoxicities. The zebrafish model is well conserved and can serve into drug development as a preclinical requirement that can decipher drug safety concerns in patients. Future studies are necessary to uncover the molecular targets of each tested chemical in zebrafish in relevance to cardiac genes/proteins. In each case, an investigation must be done of the known molecular targets of the compound. In addition, the evaluation of whether the compound affects pathways that are known to cause similar phenotypes upon disruption. Finally, if these approaches are not fruitful, a broader search may be needed for novel targets of each compound that are responsible for their effects during cardiovascular development.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


Huseyin C. Yalcin is supported by Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF), National Priority Research Program NPRP 10-0123-170222, and Qatar University internal funds, QUUG-BRC-2017-3 and QUST-BRC-SPR∖2017-1. The publication of this article was partially funded by the Qatar National Library.


  1. D. Bournele and D. Beis, “Zebrafish models of cardiovascular disease,” Heart Failure Reviews, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 803–813, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. K. L. Poon and T. Brand, “The zebrafish model system in cardiovascular research: A tiny fish with mighty prospects,” Global Cardiology Science and Practice, vol. 2013, no. 1, p. 4, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. K. Howe, M. D. Clark, and C. F. Torroja, “The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome,” Nature, vol. 496, no. 7446, pp. 498–503, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. E. E. Davis, S. Frangakis, and N. Katsanis, “Interpreting human genetic variation with in vivo zebrafish assays,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1842, no. 10, pp. 1960–1970, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. N. Chávez, G. Aedo, F. A. Fierro, M. L. Allende, and J. T. Egaña, “Zebrafish as an emerging model organism to study angiogenesis in development and regeneration,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 7, article 56, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  6. M. V. Caballero and M. Candiracci, Zebrafish as screening model for detecting toxicity and drugs efficacy, 2018.
  7. M. Cross et al., “Physiological, pharmacological and toxicological considerations of drug‐induced structural cardiac injury,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 172, no. 4, pp. 957–974, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  8. I. W. T. Selderslaghs, A. R. Van Rompay, W. De Coen, and H. E. Witters, “Development of a screening assay to identify teratogenic and embryotoxic chemicals using the zebrafish embryo,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 308–320, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. K. Augustine-Rauch, C. X. Zhang, and J. M. Panzica-Kelly, “A Developmental Toxicology Assay Platform for Screening Teratogenic Liability of Pharmaceutical Compounds,” Birth Defects Research Part B - Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 4–20, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. T. C. King-Heiden, V. Mehta, K. M. Xiong et al., “Reproductive and developmental toxicity of dioxin in fish,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 354, no. 1-2, pp. 121–138, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Jin, Z. Liu, F. Liu, Y. Ye, T. Peng, and Z. Fu, “Embryonic exposure to cadmium (II) and chromium (VI) induce behavioral alterations, oxidative stress and immunotoxicity in zebrafish (Danio rerio),” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 48, pp. 9–17, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. K. Nasrallah, M. Al-Asmakh, K. Rasool, and K. A. Mahmoud, “Ecotoxicological assessment of Ti,” Environmental Science: Nano, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 1002–1011, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. G. K. Nasrallah, Y. Zhang, M. M. Zagho et al., “A systematic investigation of the bio-toxicity of core-shell magnetic mesoporous silica microspheres using zebrafish model,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 265, pp. 195–201, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J. P. Fernández-Murray, S. V. Prykhozhij, J. N. Dufay et al., “Glycine and Folate Ameliorate Models of Congenital Sideroblastic Anemia,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 12, no. 1, p. e1005783, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. K. Nasrallah, N. N. Younes, M. H. Baji, A. M. Shraim, and I. Mustafa, “Zebrafish larvae as a model to demonstrate secondary iron overload,” European Journal of Haematology, vol. 100, no. 6, pp. 536–543, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. Hånell and N. Marklund, “Structured evaluation of rodent behavioral tests used in drug discovery research,” Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, vol. 8, article 252, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. Robert, “Preclinical assessment of anthracycline cardiotoxicity in laboratory animals: Predictiveness and pitfalls,” Cell Biology and Toxicology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. P. Ferdinandy, I. Baczkó, P. Bencsik et al., “Definition of hidden drug cardiotoxicity: paradigm change in cardiac safety testing and its clinical implications,” European Heart Journal, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Hay, D. W. Thomas, J. L. Craighead, C. Economides, and J. Rosenthal, “Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 40–51, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. I. Kola and J. Landis, “Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates?” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 711–715, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. J. Waring, J. Arrowsmith, A. R. Leach et al., “An analysis of the attrition of drug candidates from four major pharmaceutical companies,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 475–486, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. A. G. Blomme and Y. Will, “Toxicology strategies for drug discovery: present and future,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 473–504, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Munos, “Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 959–968, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. C. Cornet et al., “ZeGlobalTox: an innovative approach to address organ drug toxicity using zebrafish,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 4, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  25. Y. Han, J.-P. Zhang, J.-Q. Qian, and C.-Q. Hu, “Cardiotoxicity evaluation of anthracyclines in zebrafish (Danio rerio),” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 241–252, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. J.-J. Zhu, Y.-Q. Xu, J.-H. He et al., “Human cardiotoxic drugs delivered by soaking and microinjection induce cardiovascular toxicity in zebrafish,” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 139–148, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. P. Farrell and S. Pieperhoff, “Design and physiology of the heart | Cardiac Anatomy in Fishes,” Encyclopedia of Fish Physiology, vol. 2, pp. 998–1005, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  28. J. Bakkers, “Zebrafish as a model to study cardiac development and human cardiac disease,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 279–288, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Tu and N. C. Chi, “Zebrafish models in cardiac development and congenital heart birth defects,” Differentiation, vol. 84, no. 1, pp. 4–16, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Brown, L. Samsa, L. Qian, and J. Liu, “Advances in the study of heart development and disease using zebrafish,” Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 13, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. A. C. Grimes, H. A. Stadt, I. T. Shepherd, and M. L. Kirby, “Solving an enigma: Arterial pole development in the zebrafish heart,” Developmental Biology, vol. 290, no. 2, pp. 265–276, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. C. Singleman and N. G. Holtzman, “Analysis of postembryonic heart development and maturation in the zebrafish, Danio rerio,” Developmental Dynamics, vol. 241, no. 12, pp. 1993–2004, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Nishimura, A. Inoue, S. Sasagawa et al., “Using zebrafish in systems toxicology for developmental toxicity testing,” Congenital Anomalies, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. M. Beekhuijzen, C. de Koning, M.-E. Flores-Guillén et al., “From cutting edge to guideline: A first step in harmonization of the zebrafish embryotoxicity test (ZET) by describing the most optimal test conditions and morphology scoring system,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 56, pp. 64–76, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Hrubik et al., “Effect of PMA-induced protein kinase C activation on development and apoptosis in early zebrafish embryos,” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 190, pp. 24–31, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  36. J. T. Shin, E. V. Pomerantsev, J. D. Mably, and C. A. MacRae, “High-resolution cardiovascular function confirms functional orthology of myocardial contractility pathways in zebrafish,” Physiological Genomics, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 300–309, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. H. C. Yalcin et al., “Heart function and hemodynamics analysis for zebrafish embryos,” Developmental Dynamics, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  38. F. Boselli and J. Vermot, “Live imaging and modeling for shear stress quantification in the embryonic zebrafish heart,” Methods, vol. 94, pp. 129–134, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. A. Jamison, C. R. Samarage, R. J. Bryson-Richardson, A. Fouras, and S. Bhattacharya, “In vivo wall shear measurements within the developing zebrafish heart,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 10, p. e75722, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. F. Emran, J. Rihel, A. R. Adolph, and J. E. Dowling, “Zebrafish larvae lose vision at night,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 13, pp. 6034–6039, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. VIEWPOINT, ZebraBox Revolution, ZebraBox - Larvae Zebrafish Behavior Analysis and Tracking -ViewPoint, 2016.
  42. B. Bagatto and W. Burggren, “A three-dimensional functional assessment of heart and vessel development in the larva of the zebrafish (Danio rerio),” Physiological and Biochemical Zoology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 194–201, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. B. P. Grone, M. Marchese, K. R. Hamling et al., “Epilepsy, behavioral abnormalities, and physiological comorbidities in syntaxin-binding protein 1 (STXBP1) mutant zebrafish,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 3, p. e0151148, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. T. Parker, P.-A. Libourel, M. J. Hetheridge et al., “A multi-endpoint in vivo larval zebrafish (Danio rerio) model for the assessment of integrated cardiovascular function,” Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 30–38, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. T. P. Barros, W. K. Alderton, H. M. Reynolds, A. G. Roach, and S. Berghmans, “Zebrafish: an emerging technology for in vivo pharmacological assessment to identify potential safety liabilities in early drug discovery,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 154, no. 7, pp. 1400–1413, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H. SUKARDI et al., “Zebrafish for drug toxicity screening: bridging the in vitro cell-based models and in vivo mammalian models,” Expert Opinion on Drug Metabolism and Toxicology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 579–589, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  47. S. Vanhauwaert, S. Lefever, P. Coucke et al., “RT-qPCR gene expression analysis in zebrafish,” in The Zebrafish - Genetics, Genomics, and Transcriptomics, vol. 135 of Methods in Cell Biology, pp. 329–342, Elsevier, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. L. Jing et al., “In situ hybridization assay‐based small‐molecule screening in zebrafish,” Current Protocols in Chemical Biology, pp. 143–160, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  49. S. Mathavan, S. G. Lee, A. Mak et al., “Transcriptome Analysis of Zebrafish Embryogenesis Using Microarrays,” PLoS Genetics, vol. 1, no. 2, p. e29, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. H. Visscher et al., “Validation of variants in SLC28A3 and UGT1A6 as genetic markers predictive of anthracycline‐induced cardiotoxicity in children,” Pediatric Blood and Cancer, vol. 60, no. 8, pp. 1375–1381, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  51. F. Aminkeng, C. J. Ross, S. R. Rassekh et al., “Recommendations for genetic testing to reduce the incidence of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 683–695, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. L. Leong, N. Chaiyakunapruk, and S. W. Lee, “Candidate gene association studies of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, article 39, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. C. Chakraborty, A. R. Sharma, G. Sharma, and S. Lee, “Zebrafish: a complete animal model to enumerate the nanoparticle toxicity,” Journal of Nanobiotechnology, vol. 14, no. 1, article 65, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. C. A. Dlugos and R. A. Rabin, “Structural and functional effects of developmental exposure to ethanol on the zebrafish heart,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1013–1021, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Sarmah and J. A. Marrs, “Zebrafish as a vertebrate model system to evaluate effects of environmental toxicants on cardiac development and function,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 12, article 2123, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  56. E. J. Mersereau et al., “The effects of cocaine on heart rate and electrocardiogram in zebrafish (Danio rerio),” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 172, no. Part C, pp. 1–6, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  57. L. D. Ellis, E. C. Soo, J. C. Achenbach, M. G. Morash, K. H. Soanes, and R. L. Tanguay, “Use of the zebrafish larvae as a model to study cigarette smoke condensate toxicity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 12, p. e115305, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. X. Li, A. Gao, Y. Wang et al., “Alcohol exposure leads to unrecoverable cardiovascular defects along with edema and motor function changes in developing zebrafish larvae,” Biology Open, vol. 5, no. 8, pp. 1128–1133, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. L. I. Zon and R. T. Peterson, “In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Albini, G. Pennesi, F. Donatelli, R. Cammarota, S. de Flora, and D. M. Noonan, “Cardiotoxicity of anticancer drugs: the need for cardio-oncology and cardio-oncological prevention,” Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 14–25, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. E. Lipshultz, J. A. Alvarez, and R. E. Scully, “Anthracycline associated cardiotoxicity in survivors of childhood cancer,” Heart, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 525–533, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. D. Bovelli, G. Plataniotis, and F. Roila, “Cardiotoxicity of chemotherapeutic agents and radiotherapy-related heart disease: ESMO clinical practice guidelines,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. v277–v282, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. T. A. C. O. C. FOUNDATION, Cardiovascular Toxicity in Cancer Survivors: Current Guidelines and Future Directions, 2018.
  64. E. Raschi et al., “Anticancer drugs and cardiotoxicity: insights and perspectives in the era of targeted therapy,” Pharmacology and therapeutics, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 196–218, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  65. J.-H. He et al., “A zebrafish phenotypic assay for assessing drug-induced hepatotoxicity,” Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  66. L. Damico, “Assessment of drug-induced cardiotoxicity in zebrafish,” in Zebrafish: Methods for Assessing Drug Safety and Toxicity, pp. 45–54, John Wiley and Sons, Inc, New Jersey, Ny, USA, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  67. B. Wiśniowska, Z. Tylutki, G. Wyszogrodzka, and S. Polak, “Drug-drug interactions and QT prolongation as a commonly assessed cardiac effect - comprehensive overview of clinical trials,” BMC Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 17, no. 1, article no. 12, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. D. M. Roden, “Drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 10, pp. 1013–1022, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. P. McGrath and C.-Q. Li, “Zebrafish: a predictive model for assessing drug-induced toxicity,” Drug Discovery Therapy, vol. 13, no. 9-10, pp. 394–401, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. L. Yang, N. Y. Ho, R. Alshut et al., “Zebrafish embryos as models for embryotoxic and teratological effects of chemicals,” Reproductive Toxicology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 245–253, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. W. Tolcher, L. J. Appleman, G. I. Shapiro et al., “A phase i open-label study evaluating the cardiovascular safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced cancer,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 751–764, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. J. P. M. Fang, D. Zhu, C. Luo et al., “An In Vivo Assessment: Cardiotoxicity Induced by Three Kinds of Addictive Drugs (Methamphetamine, Ketamine, and Methadone) in Zebrafish Embryos,” International Journal of Public Health and Safety, vol. 1, no. 3, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  73. S. S. Dhillon et al., “Optimisation of Embryonic and Larval ECG Measurement in Zebrafish for Quantifying the Effect of QT Prolonging Drugs,” PLOS ONE, vol. 8, no. 4, article e60552, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  74. G. H. Jang, M. P. Hwang, S. Y. Kim, H. S. Jang, and K. H. Lee, “A systematic in-vivo toxicity evaluation of nanophosphor particles via zebrafish models,” Biomaterials, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 440–449, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. J. Duan et al., “Cardiovascular toxicity evaluation of silica nanoparticles in endothelial cells and zebrafish model,” Biomaterials, vol. 34, no. 23, pp. 5853–5862, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  76. M. N. V. Ravi kumar, “A review of chitin and chitosan applications,” Reactive and Functional Polymers, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  77. K. Rasool et al., “"Green" ZnO-Interlinked Chitosan Nanoparticles for the Efficient Inhibition of Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria in Inject Seawater,” ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 3896–3906, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  78. G. Nasrallah et al., Ecotoxicological Assessment of Ti3C2Tx (MXene) Using Zebrafish Embryo Model, 2018.

Copyright © 2018 Zain Z. Zakaria et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

3144 Views | 949 Downloads | 13 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.