BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

New Insights into and Updates on Antimicrobial Agents from Natural Products

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 1896240 | 11 pages |

Evaluation of the Efficiency of Ethanol Precipitation and Ultrafiltration on the Purification and Characteristics of Exopolysaccharides Produced by Three Lactic Acid Bacteria

Academic Editor: Taoufik Ghrairi
Received29 Apr 2018
Accepted09 Aug 2018
Published18 Sep 2018


Exopolysaccharides (EPS) produced by three Lactic Acid Bacteria strains, Lactococcus lactis SLT10, Lactobacillus plantarum C7, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides B3, were isolated using two methods: ethanol precipitation (EPS-ETOH) and ultrafiltration (EPS-UF) through a 10 KDa cut-off membrane. EPS recovery by ultrafiltration was higher than ethanol precipitation for Lactococcus lactis SLT10 and Lactobacillus plantarum C7. However, it was similar with both methods for Leuconostoc mesenteroides B3. The monomer composition of the EPS fractions revealed differences in structures and molar ratios between the two studied methods. EPS isolated from Lactococcus lactis SLT10 are composed of glucose and mannose for EPS-ETOH against glucose, mannose, and rhamnose for EPS-UF. EPS extracted from Lactobacillus plantarum C7 and Leuconostoc mesenteroides B3 showed similar composition (glucose and mannose) but different molar ratios. The molecular weights of the different EPS fractions ranged from 11.6±1.83 to 62.4±2.94 kDa. Molecular weights of EPS-ETOH fractions were higher than those of EPS-UF fractions. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis revealed a similarity in the distribution of the functional groups (O-H, C-H, C=O, -COO, and C-O-C) between the EPS isolated from the three strains.

1. Introduction

Exopolysaccharides (EPS) are long-chain polymers, industrially used as thickeners, stabilizers, and gelling agents in food products. More recently they were used as depollution agents and there was a growing interest in their biological functions like antitumor, antioxidant, or prebiotic activities [1]. Exopolysaccharides are produced by the metabolic processes of microorganisms such as bacteria, fungi, and blue-green algae [2]. Bacterial Exopolysaccharides are widely described in the literature, offering a wide range of biological and physicochemical properties.

Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) represent a natural source of EPS which play an important role in the rheological behavior and texture of fermented milks [35]. Most LAB producing EPS belong to the genera Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, and Pediococcus [6].

EPSs from LAB can be classified into two groups: homopolysaccharides and heteropolysaccharides. Homopolysaccharides consist of repeating units of only one type of monosaccharide (D-glucose or D-fructose) and can be divided into two major groups: glucans and fructans. By contrast, heteropolysaccharides, produced by a great variety of mesophilic and thermophilic LAB, are formed by repeating units that most often contain a combination of D-glucose, D-galactose, and L-rhamnose and, in a few cases, N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc), or glucuronic acid (GlcA). Sometimes, noncarbohydrate substituent such as phosphate, acetyl, and glycerol are present. The molecular mass of these polymers ranges between 40 and 6000 kDa [4]. Heteropolysaccharides from LAB demonstrate different structures [7]. The heteropolysaccharides are constructed from multiple copies of oligosaccharides, which contain between three and eight residues. Two or more different monosaccharides are usually present in each repeating unit and show different linkage patterns [8].

EPSs produced by LAB are in great variety, depending on LAB strains, culture conditions, and medium composition [9], and often differ by monosaccharides composition, charge, linkages between units, and presence of repeated side chains. The sugar components of EPS from LAB are most commonly galactose, glucose, and rhamnose [3]. The EPSs isolated from some strains of Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris contain rhamnose, glucose, galactose, and phosphates [1012], while others contain only glucose and galactose. Marshall et al. [13] found that Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris LC330 produced two EPSs with different sugar composition and molecular mass: a neutral EPS of 1.106 kDa and a smaller negatively charged EPS (containing phosphate groups) of about 1.104 kDa. Van Casteren et al. [14] reported that EPS from Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris B40 consists of rhamnose, galactose, and glucose in the ratio of 0.9:1.2:2.0 and that the molar ratio of carbohydrate and phosphorus is 4.7:1. Streptococcus thermophilus produce an EPS composed of galactose and rhamnose when grown on milk [9]. Lactobacillus bulgaricus grown on chemically defined medium produce an EPS composed of galactose, glucose, and rhamnose [15]. Many strains of Leuconostoc mesenteroides produce dextran (α-glucan). Levans are produced by several strains of Streptococcus mutans [3].

Wide range of exopolysaccharides extraction, purification, and analysis schemes have been developed in literature involving from simple dialysis against water of the culture medium following by freeze drying to size exclusion column for preparing of highly pure EPS extracts.

Some authors used trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for protein sedimentation, dialysis for final EPS purification from sugars, or just numerous precipitations with ethanol and/or acetone [6]. Others procedures have been used for EPS purification including microfiltration, ultrafiltration, and diafiltration which can be carried out separately or in combination with ethanol precipitation [1618]. Different types of membranes have been used such as regenerated cellulose and polyethersulfone, as well as different molecular weight cut-off [19].

In order to obtain pure polysaccharide fractions, size exclusion chromatography is the most common method used because it allows the separation of polysaccharides according to their size and also permits the subsequent determination of their molecular weight [19].

These different methods can be compared according to two criteria: quantity and quality of extracted EPS. It was shown that different extraction procedures influence the quantity and the composition of the extracted EPS [20, 21], the quantity and the composition of the mineral fraction present in the EPS extracts [22], and EPS binding properties to protons and different metals [20, 23, 24].

More advanced technologies to obtain polysaccharides have been used recently, as ultrasonic [25] and microwave assisted extractions [26] besides the pressurized solvent extraction [27]. The latter procedure showed to be faster and more efficient in obtaining higher yield of polysaccharides, comparing to the traditional methodologies.

In the present study, we characterized the EPS fractions obtained from pure bacterial culture of Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis var. diacetylactis SLT10 (Lc. lactis SLT10), Lactobacillus plantarum C7 (Lb. plantarum C7), and Leuconostoc mesenteroides B3 (Ln. mesenteroides B3) to evaluate the influence of purification methods on the EPS yield, composition, and molecular weight. The studied purification methods were ethanol precipitation and ultrafiltration.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Bacterial Strains

The three studied strains were obtained from the strain collection of Laboratory of Microbial Ecology and Technology (LETMi): Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis SLT10 strain had been previously isolated in our laboratory from Tunisian traditional fermented milk [28]. Lactobacillus plantarum C7 (Lb. plantarum C7) had been isolated from gastrointestinal tract of chickens [29] and Leuconostoc mesenteroides B3 (Ln. mesenteroides B3) had been isolated from Tunisian palm sap [30]. Stock cultures grown in MRS broth were stored at −18°C in 50% glycerol until use.

2.2. Fermentation

The MRS-sucrose medium was used for EPS production and contain: 4% (w/v) sucrose, 10 g/L tryptone, 10 g/L meat extract, 5 g/L yeast extract, 5 g/L sodium acetate, 2 g/L disodium phosphate, 2 g/L tri-ammonium citrate, 0.1 g/L MgSO4, and 0.05 g/L MnSO4 (pH 6.5) [31, 32]. The medium was autoclaved at 121°C for 15 min. The fermentation temperature, inoculum size, and fermentation time were 30°C, 3.0% (v/v), and 24 h, respectively. After incubation, bacterial cells were separated from the EPS preparation by centrifugation (5,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C) of the culture broth. The supernatant, containing the EPS fraction, was filtered under vacuum through Sartorius cellulose nitrate filters of (0.45 μm pore size) to eliminate cells and large cellular. The obtained supernatant was divided into two batches for the purification step.

2.3. Purification of Exopolysaccharides

The obtained supernatant was divided in two batches. The first supernatant was treated with NaCl to a final concentration of 1 M. EPS was precipitated by the addition of v/v chilled ethanol (96%) to the supernatant (EPS-ETOH). The proportion of chilled ethanol (v/v) was chosen in order to precipitate high-molecular weight exopolysaccharides. After precipitation at 4°C (overnight) the sample was centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C, and the pellet was washed with ethanol (96%) and recentrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 20 min at 4°C. The pellet obtained was redissolved in distilled water and lyophilized.

The second supernatant was ultrafiltrated (UF) using a 10 kDa cut-off cellulose membrane. Finally, the exopolysaccharide fraction (EPS-UF), collected from the retentate, was evaporated and lyophilized.

2.4. Exopolysaccharides Characterization
2.4.1. Monosaccharide Analysis

The monomer composition of exopolysaccharides extracted from the three studied strains was determined after preparation of methyl glycosides trimethylsylil derivatives. Suspensions were prepared by dissolving 4 mg of lyophilized polysaccharides in 2 mL distilled water. Fifty μL of myo-inositol, used as internal standard, was added to 200 μL of polysaccharides suspension. The mixture was hydrolyzed for 4 h at 100°C, in screw glass tube, using 500 μL of methanol/HCl (3 N) (Supelco). After cooling to room temperature, methanolyzate fractions were neutralized with silver carbonate, centrifuged at 6,000 rpm for 5 min, and evaporated under nitrogen flow. The generated methyl glycosides were then converted to their corresponding volatile trimethylsilyl derivatives. The reaction took place by adding 70 μL pyridine and 70 μL derivatization reagent, Bis(tri-methylsilyl) trifluoroacetamide (BSTFA) + 1% trimethylchlorosilane (TMCS) (Supelco), incubated for 30 min at 80°C. After solvent evaporation under nitrogen flow, the generated per-O-trimethylsilylmethyl glycosides were resuspended in 700 μL dichloromethane and analyzed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). An Agilent GC 6850A instrument equipped with HP-5MS capillary column (30 m length, 0.25 mm diameter, and 0.25 μm film thicknesses) was used. The GC oven temperature was set to 120°C, increased first to 180°C at 3°C/min, then increased to 200°C at 2°C/min, and held for 5 min. The helium carrier gas flow was set at 1.5 mL/min and the injection volume was 0.1 μL.

2.4.2. Molecular Mass Determination

The average molecular mass of exopolysaccharides extracted from the three studied strains was determined using high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) equipped with Shodex OHpak SB-804 HQ and SB-805 HQ columns placed in series. The EPS was eluted with 0.1 M Sodium Nitrate (NaNO3) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL.min−1. Detection was performed using a refractive index detector (RI) (Waters) and a multiangle laser-light scattering detector (LS) (MiniDAWN, Wyatt Technology, Dawn).

2.4.3. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy of Purified EPS

The structural characterization of the purified EPS was studied using Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy in order to determine their functional groups distribution. The translucent pellets (5mmØ) were made by mixing and pressing the freeze-dried polysaccharides samples with KBr powder (5:100 w/w). The FTIR spectra were recorded in transmittance mode at a spectral range of 4000 and 400 cm−1 with an accumulation of 15 scans and a resolution was 4 cm−1, using a spectrophotometer type Perkin Elmer Spectrum BX®, equipped with a He-Ne laser and a detector MCT type broadband and high sensitivity [33]. The spectra acquisition was performed via spectrum v5.3.1 software. The bands identification was accomplished according to the data cited by Wiercigroch et al. [34].

2.5. Analytical Methods
2.5.1. Total Sugar Determination

Total carbohydrate content of the exopolysaccharides obtained by ethanol precipitation and ultrafiltration was estimated by the phenol-sulfuric acid calorimetric method [35]. A 200 μl EPS sample solution (10 mg.mL−1) was treated with 200 μl of a 5% phenol solution and 1 ml of pure H2SO4. The mixture was cooled to room temperature for 30 min. Absorbance at 492 nm of samples as well as standard sugar (10 to 100 μg.mL−1 ribose) was read by spectrophotometry (Hitachi U-1800®).

2.5.2. Protein Concentration Measurement

Protein content was calculated according to the Bradford’s method [36]. 1 mL of reagent (Biorad) was added to 20 μL of sample (10 mg.mL−1) and incubated 5 min at room temperature. OD of samples as well as the standard protein (0 to 0.75 mg.mL-1 of Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA)) was measured at 595 nm (Hitachi U-1800®).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate and are reported as means ± standard deviation. Significant differences between samples were tested using a two-sample comparison analysis and a t-test. The statistical significance of the relationship was analyzed at the 95% confidence level.

3. Results and Discussion

The three studied strains were isolated from different ecological niches. Lc. lactis SLT10 is a starter used for the preparation of “Leben” a Tunisian fermented milk; Lb. plantarum C7 is a probiotic strain isolated from gastrointestinal tract of chickens. For both strains, characterization of EPS produced can provide important data concerning their uses as starters for the preparation of fermented functional foods. As regards Ln. mesenteroides B3, this is the first time that a strain isolated from Tunisian palm sap was investigated for EPS production.

3.1. Effect of Purification Method on Exopolysaccharides Yield

In order to isolate EPS produced by the three studied strains, two purification methods were used: ethanol precipitation and ultrafiltration (UF) through 10 kDa membrane. Molar exclusion limit of 10 kDa has been chosen based on preliminary study showing that bacterial polysaccharides fractions presented molecular weight higher than 10 kDa. Moreover, with molecular weight cut-off of 10 kDa high- and low-molecular weight, polysaccharides are retained, while oligosaccharides, polypeptides, and so forth are removed.

The evaluation of the efficiency of both methods on polysaccharides recovery after purification step was conducted using the phenol-sulfuric method described by Dubois et al. [35] for the determination of sugars and related compounds on the freeze-dried extract. This method has been widely used as an indication of the EPS yield after different purification methods. Results are summarized in Table 1.


Lc. Lactis SLT1028.06±0.04133.63±1.38
Lb. plantarum C719.82±0.30526.54±0.905
Ln. mesenteroides B322.07±0.01922.044±0.366

As shown in Table 1, EPS recovery by UF was significantly higher than ethanol precipitation for Lc. lactis SLT10 and Lb. plantarum C7 (t<0.05). UF was more efficient than ethanol precipitation method (1.2 times more). However, EPS recovery was similar for both methods for Ln. mesenteroides B3. Indeed, UF is widely used method for polysaccharides purification. Similar results were found by Bergmaier et al. [16], who compared UF with a conventional method based on ethanol precipitation, dialysis, and protein removal by trichloroacetic acid; the EPS recovery by the UF was higher.

Higher EPS recovery (70.38%) was, also, found by Pan and Mei [32] when using UF for the purification of EPS obtained from Lc. lactis subsp. lactis 12. Tuinier el al. [17] used UF with a polysulfone membrane (molar exclusion limit10 kDa) after a microfiltration step for the separation of EPSB40 from Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris on whey based media; the freeze-dried extract contains 63% EPS.

Polysaccharides yields obtained in this work (Table 1) were low compared to literature. This result can be explained by the following: (i) both methods used are not appropriate to isolate EPS which affects strongly the final yield; (ii) EPS production by the three studied strains was limited in these culture conditions. Remada and Abraham [37] studied the effect of a heat treatment of the milk on EPS recovery and found that the highest recovery of EPS was obtained when samples were heated as a first step of isolation. The heat treatment allows the separation of polysaccharide attached to cells since that it has been shown that LAB express at least two distinct phenotypic forms of EPS, either ropy and/or capsular forms [38]. In the procedures without heat treatment, part of the polysaccharide attached to cells would be lost with pellet during broth culture centrifugation. Moreover, heat treatment inactivates the enzymes that could hydrolyze the polymer (glycohydrolases). Remada and Abraham [37] suggested also a method involving 1 or 2 steps of ethanol precipitation followed by dialysis with different cut-off membranes than TCA precipitation.

Proteins content of freeze-dried extracts for both methods was evaluated using Bradford’s assay. Results are shown in Table 2.


Lc. Lactis SLT101.008±0.0491.284±0.048
Lb. plantarum C70.928±0.0360.414±0.027
Ln. mesenteroides B30.925±0.0330.808±0.067

The low proteins content (about 1%) of all studied samples approves the efficiency of these methods to separate proteins from polysaccharides and to provide a high purity extracts. Similar results (1% of proteins) were found by Maalej et al. [39] for EPS22 extracted from Pseudomonas stutzeri AS22 by applying ultrafiltration followed by dialysis. Pan and Mei [32] indicated an absence of proteins and nucleic acid in the EPS-I extracted from Lc. lactis subsp. lactis 12 by ultrafiltration. Similar results were also found after the analysis of purified EPS sample from Lb. plantarum YW11 using anion-exchange chromatography on DEAE-cellulose with 1.38±0.25% proteins content [40]. The proteins content of EPS from Leuconostoc sp. CFR 2181 extracted by Ice-cold isopropyl alcohol precipitation and washed with acetone was only 0.8% [41]. Tuinier el al. [17] obtained proteins content of 18% for Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris when grown on whey based media.

3.2. Monomer Composition and Molar Ratio of Exopolysaccharides

Different methods are available for determining the monomer composition of EPS samples. Methanolysis and per-trimethylsilylation provide samples that can be analyzed by GC. Hanko and Rohrer [42] proposed a simple method, requiring acid hydrolysis followed by monomer detection using high-pressure anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection.

In our work, monosaccharides composition of different polysaccharides fractions were determined according to Kamerling method [43] modified by par Montreuil [44]. Identification and quantification of monosaccharides began with a methanolysis of the polymer. The glycosidic residues are converted to their corresponding volatile trimethylsilyl derivatives and then analyzed by gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID). The sugar composition and molar ratios of EPS-ETOH and EPS-UF extracts from the three studied strains are summarized in Table 3.

StrainsMonomersMolar ratioMol ()

Lc. Lactococcus SLT10Glucose0.47±0.0330.58±0.00011.97±0.0088.46±0.35

Lb. plantarum C7Glucose0.607±0.1624.07±0.823.34±1.3113.36±8.11
Mannose116.01 ± 3.778.98±7.73
Total9.35 ± 5.0922.34±2.73

Ln. mesenteroides B3Glucose0.61± 0.023.48± 0.021.97± 0.16713.35± .09
Mannose113.21 ±0.383.85 ±0.62
Total5.19 ±0.5417.20 ±2.72

For SLT10, the main sugars were glucose (Glu) and mannose (Man) for EPS-ETOH in the molar ratio of 0.47:1, while (Glu), mannose (Man), and rhamnose (Rha) were present in EPS-UF in the molar ratio of 0.58:1:0.18. This result suggests that the strain produces heteropolysaccharides. Pan and Mei [32] showed that EPS-I extracted from L. lactis subsp. lactis 12 is mainly composed of fructose and rhamnose. According to literature, Lc. lactis subsp. lactis and Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris produce heteropolysaccharides. Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris B40 and Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris SBT 0495 produce an EPS composed of glucose, galactose, rhamnose, and phosphate at a ratio of 2:2:1:1 [11, 14]. This diversity in EPS composition produced by Lc. lactis can be explained by genetic studies. Indeed, genes implicated in EPS production in Lc. lactis are encoded by plasmid DNA. The first lactococcal eps locus identified was that of Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris NIZO B40; it comprises 14 plasmid-encoded genes [45]. Since then, partial sequences of eps gene clusters have been identified in Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris NIZO B891 and NIZO B35 strains [46]. Cluster consisting of 23 putative EPS biosynthetic determinants has been identified on plasmid pCI658 in Lc. lactis subsp. cremoris HO2 [47].

GC-MS analysis of the monosaccharide composition of the EPS produced by Lb. plantarum C7 showed that the EPS was composed of glucose and mannose in a molar ratio of 0.607:1 for EPS-ETOH and 4.07:1 for EPS-UF, which suggested that the strain produces heteropolysaccharides. Different monomers composition and proportion of Lb. plantarum strains are available in the literature. The EPS purified from Lb. plantarum YW11 using anion-exchange chromatography is composed of glucose and galactose in a molar ratio of 2.71:1 [40]. EPS extracted from Lb. plantarum KF5 presented a monomer composition of mannose, glucose, and galactose in a molar ratio of 1:4.99:6.90 [48]. Li et al. [49] showed that the strain Lb. plantarum 70810 isolated from Chinese paocai produced two types of EPS with a monomer composition of glucose, mannose, and galactose in a molar ratio of 18.21:78.76:3.03 and 12.92:30.89:56.19, respectively. Indeed, the monosaccharide composition of EPS produced by LAB can be affected by the type of strains; Laws et al. [8] revealed that the genes coding for EPS synthesis are of plasmid origin in the mesophilic LAB strains (e.g., Lactococcus), but they are chromosomally based in the thermophilic strains (Streptococcus and Lactobacilli). In general, the EPS-producing ability of LAB is regarded as being unstable. For mesophilic LAB strains, the unstable nature of EPS synthesis is consistent with the genes for EPS synthesis being plasmid bound. For the thermophilic LAB strains, it has been proposed that the loss of EPS-producing character is due to deletions and rearrangement resulting from genetic instability.

For Ln. mesenteroides B3, GC analysis showed a monomeric composition of glucose and mannose in a molar ratio of 0.61:1 for EPS-ETOH and 3.48:1 for EPS-UF. Even though, Leuconostocs are well known for the production of homopolysaccharides such as alternan, dextran, and levan from sucrose metabolism [50], the strain Leuconostoc mesenteroides B3 produces a heteropolysaccharide composed of glucose and mannose. Indeed, Welman and Maddox [51] revealed that themesophilic LAB such as Leuconostoc mesenteroides also produces heteropolysaccharides. Previous study showed the ability of Leuconostocs to produce heteropolysaccharides; the EPS isolated from Leuconostoc sp. CFR 2181 consisted mainly of glucose (91%) with minor quantities of rhamnose and arabinose [41].

Based on Table 3, the main observation was the difference in monomer composition of EPS extracted by ultrafiltration and ethanol precipitation for Lc. lactis SLT10. Moreover, for the strains Lb. plantarum C7 and Ln. mesenteroides B3 when comparing both purification methods and in spite of similarity in monomer composition, the molar ratios were different.

This result can be explained by the hypothesis that when sucrose was used as carbon source, the studied strains synthesize mixtures of EPSs. The EPSs can have different structures (different monomeric composition) in the case of the strain SLT10 or different molar ratios with the same monomers for Lb. plantarum C7 and Ln. mesenteroides B3. Thus, we can suggest that the strain SLT10 produces at least two types of exopolysaccharides with different molecular weight and different monomeric composition: the first one with the higher molecular weight is composed of glucose and mannose and the second one with lower molecular weight probably contains rhamnose. When ultrafiltration is used as purification method, with a 10 kDa cut-off membrane that could retain either high- and low-molecular weight polysaccharides, both EPSs were retained. However for ethanol precipitation only one EPS was precipitated; probably the one with the higher molecular weight composed of glucose and mannose.

For the strains Lb. plantarum C7 and Ln. mesenteroides B3, there is also the possibility of recovering EPS samples that have identical structure (glucose and mannose) but different molecular masses. In previous studies Comte et al. [20] have showed that the EPS characteristics present qualitative and quantitative differences depending on the method used. They found that the extraction methods using chemical reagents strongly affected the HPSEC (high-pressure size exclusion chromatography) fingerprints of EPS, whereas the physical methods influenced only molecular weight distribution but not HPSEC fingerprints. It had been shown that Lactobacillus spp. G-77 produces two homopolysaccharides with different structures [52] (Duenas-Chasco et al., 1998). Degeest and de Vuyst [53] reported the production of a high-molecular mass and a low-molecular mass EPS by Streptococcus thermophilus LY03. The production of two polysaccharides by Lb. rhamnosus has been reported [54]. A strain of Lb. reuteri LB 121 is able to produce two types of homopolysaccharides mainly composed of D-glucose or D-fructose [55].

3.3. Molecular Mass Estimation

The molecular mass of different EPSs isolated from the three studied strains with both methods was estimated using high-performance size exclusion chromatography (HPSEC). The molecular weight distribution of EPS-UF and EPS-ETOH fractions of Lb. plantarum C7, Lc. lactis SLT10, and Ln. mesenteroides B3 is presented in Figures 1 and 2.

Molecular weight (Mw), molecular number (Mn), and polydispersity index of EPSs isolated from the three studied stains are summarized in Table 4.

Purification methodStrainsMw (kDa)Mn (kDa)Polydispersity Index (Mw/Mn)Mass recovery ()

EPS-ETOHLc. lactis SLT1062.4±2.9419.3±2.073.231±0.4737.3
Lb. plantarum C733.7±2.898.5±3.443.968±1.6446.0
Ln. mesenteroides B3----

EPS-UFLc. lactis SLT1051.5±1.7512.3±1.384.178±0.4954.6
Lb. plantarum C711.6±1.832.1±0.955.586±2.6653.5
Ln. mesenteroides B318.6±2.218.4±1.522.204±0.40746.1

The result showed that the three strains present different EPS molecular masses. Indeed, the molar mass of the EPS produced by LAB varied according to strains and polymer type [6]. Generally, the EPSs produced by the bacterial strains in MRS-sucrose media are lower-molecular-mass fractions, whose molecular masses do not exceed 62.4±2.94 kDa. The MW of EPS extracted from Lc. lactis SLT 10 was the highest with both purification methods (62.4±2.94 kDa and 51.5 kDa±1.75). Heteropolysaccharides ranged from 40 to 9000 kDa for Streptococcus thermophilus strains and 100 to 2000 kDa for Lc. lactis spp. cremoris strains [6].

The molecular mass of the EPS produced by Lb. plantarum C7 was determined to be 33.5±2.89 kDa (EPS-ETOH) and 11.6±1.83 kDa (EPS-UF) which was similar to that (44 kDa) of the EPS of L. plantarum EP56 [56] but lower than that (110 kDa) of the EPS of Lactobacillus plantarum YW11 [40] and (1150 kDa) of the EPS of Lb. plantarum C88 [57].

The molecular mass of EPS purified from Ln. mesenteroides B3 was only available for EPS-UF and was 18.6±2.21 kDa which in the same range of magnitude of those reported for the EPS fractions of Leuconostoc sp. CFR 2181 with molecular weights ranging from 10 kDa to 1500 kDa [41].

The polydispersity index Mw/Mn (Mw, weight-average; Mn, number-average), which reflects the degree of heterogeneity of the polymer’s chain lengths, is ranging from 2.204±0.407 to 5.586±2.66 (>1) which represents a heterogeneous populations in terms of polysaccharide chains size. The lower polydispersity index value was obtained for the EPS fraction purified from Ln. mesenteroides B3 (2.204±0.407) which can be considered as moderately polydisperse distribution type even when the EPS fractions purified from Lc. lactis SLT10 and Lb. plantarum C7 were considered as broadly polydisperse distribution type.

The results from Table 4 show two mains observations: (i) EPS-ETOH fractions molecular weights were higher than those of EPS-UF fractions and (ii) the heterogeneity of EPS fractions is more pronounced when UF was used as purification method (polydispersity index ranged from 4.178±0.49 to 5.586±2.66).

These observations can be explained by the hypothesis given above that the studied strains grown in MRS-sucrose produce more than one polymer with various molecular masses causing the heterogeneity of the freeze-dried extracts (high polydispersity index). This hypothesis could explain variations in monomer composition and molecular ratios of EPS-ETOH and EPS-UF. When using UF as purification methods, polymers produced by the lactic strains remain in the retentate. However, when using ethanol for purification, only one polymer precipitates (probably the one with the highest molecular weight). Grobben et al. [15] found that Lb. bulgaricus strain NCFB 2772, grown in chemically defined medium, produced two EPS fractions with molecular masses of 40 and 1700 kDa. Similar results were reported with Lc. Lactis subsp. cremoris LC 330 [13].

3.4. The Structural Characterization of the Purified EPS

FTIR spectroscopy has been a powerful and valuable analytical method to investigate the nature of the functional groups of EPS in terms of monomeric units and their linkages. Figure 3 shows the FTIR spectra of EPS fractions from Lb. plantarum C7, Lc. lactis SLT10, and Ln. mesenteroides B3 obtained by precipitation in a final ethanol concentration 96%.

The spectrum of purified EPS was studied in the region between 400 cm−1 and 4000 cm−1 and showed numerous peaks from 3434 cm−1 to 534 cm−1. In comparison with the IR spectra of polysaccharides listed in the literature, all the peaks obtained were in agreement with the typical absorption peaks of polysaccharides.

As can be seen, no significant difference in the main absorption intensity was observed among the three fractions. However, upon close comparison of the spectra, small differences are observed.

The broad absorption peak observed at around 3434-3420 cm−1 indicated the presence of intensive hydroxyl groups (O-H) stretching frequency confirming the polysaccharide nature of the material [58]. The C–H stretching vibration gives signals between 2928 and 2850 cm−1 [59]. The peak observed around 2366 cm−1 is attributed to O-H bond groups, which could be explained by their carbohydrate nature.

The absorption peaks at 1634 cm−1, 1628 cm−1, and 1626 cm−1 were due to the stretch vibration of carboxyl group (C = O) [60]. The absorption at 1404 and 1406 cm−1 was due to the symmetric stretching of –COO.

There were peaks near 1000-1200 cm−1, indicating that the polysaccharide contained α-pyranose. Indeed, the carbohydrates show high absorbencies in this region, which is within the so-called fingerprint region, where the position and the intensity of the bands are specific for every polysaccharide, allowing its possible identification [61].

The intense peaks at 1094 cm−1, 1074 cm−1, and 1048 cm−1 were attributed to the vibration of the glycosidic linkage C-O-C of glucose [60].

Along with these peaks, more characteristic peaks at 870 and 804 cm–1 region were also detected indicating that the EPS contained both α and β-type glycosidic linkages between sugar monomers [62]. These peaks are absent in the EPS fraction extracted from Ln. mesenteroides B3.

The weak adoption band at 534-538 cm−1, absent in the EPS fraction purified from Ln. mesenteroides B3, was indicative of glycosidic linkage peak for polysaccharide.

4. Conclusion

In this work, ultrafiltration and ethanol precipitation were used for the purification of EPSs produced by three Lactic Acid Bacteria strains isolated from different Tunisian biotopes. Results confirmed that EPS recovery by ultrafiltration was significantly higher than ethanol precipitation for Lc. lactis SLT10 and Lb. plantarum C7. GC-MS and HPSEC analysis of EPSs showed that the three studied strains produce a heteropolysaccharides with low-molecular masses. Depending on purification method, the monomeric composition and molar ratios of the different EPS fractions are affected.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


This work was supported by Research Grant “SSHN” from French Institute of Cooperation, Tunis, Tunisia.


  1. C. Liu, J. Lu, L. Lu, Y. Liu, F. Wang, and M. Xiao, “Isolation, structural characterization and immunological activity of an exopolysaccharide produced by Bacillus licheniformis 8-37-0-1,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 101, no. 14, pp. 5528–5533, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. Ye, F. Liu, J. Wang, H. Wang, and M. Zhang, “Antioxidant activities of an exopolysaccharide isolated and purified from marine Pseudomonas PF-6,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 764–770, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  3. J. Cerning, “Exocellular polysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 87, no. 1-2, pp. 113–130, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  4. P. Ruas-Madiedo, J. Hugenholtz, and P. Zoon, “An overview of the functionality of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 12, pp. 163–171, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  5. S. Badel, T. Bernardi, and P. Michaud, “New perspectives for Lactobacilli exopolysaccharides,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 54–66, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  6. P. Ruas-Madiedo and C. G. de los Reyes-Gavilán, “Invited review: methods for the screening, isolation, and characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 843–856, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  7. L. De Vuyst, F. De Vin, F. Vaningelgem, and B. Degeest, “Recent developments in the biosynthesis and applications of heteropolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 687–707, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Laws, Y. Gu, and V. Marshall, “Biosynthesis, characterisation, and design of bacterial exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 597–625, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. J. Looijesteijn and J. J. Hugenholtz, “Uncoupling of growth and exopolysaccharide production by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris NIZO B40 and optimization of its synthesis,” Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 178–182, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. Higashimura, B. W. Mulder-Bosman, R. Reich, T. Iwasaki, and G. W. Robijn, “Solution properties of viilian, the exopolysaccharide from Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris SBT 0495,” Biopolymer, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 43–58, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. H. Nakajima, T. Hirota, T. Toba, T. Itoh, and S. Adachi, “Structure of the extracellular polysaccharide from slime-forming Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris SBT 0495,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 224, pp. 245–253, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Z. Yang, E. Huttunen, M. Staaf, G. Widmalm, and T. Heikki, “Separation, purification and characterisation ofextracellular polysaccharides produced by slime-forming Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris strains,” International Dairy Journal, vol. 9, pp. 631–638, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  13. V. M. Marshall, E. N. Cowie, and R. S. Moreton, “Analysis and Production of 2 Exopolysaccharides from Lactococcus-Lactis subsp. cremoris Lc330,” Journal of Dairy Research, vol. 62, pp. 621–628, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  14. W. H. M. Van Casteren, C. Dijkema, H. A. Schols, G. Beldman, and A. G. J. Voragen, “Characterisation and modification of the exopolysaccharide produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris B40,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 123–130, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. J. Grobben, W. H. van Casteren, H. A. Schols et al., “Analysis of the exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus NCFB 2772 grown in continuous culture on glucose and fructose,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 516–521, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. D. Bergmaier, C. Lacroix, M. G. Macedo, and P. Champagne, “New method for exopolysaccharide determination in culture broth using stirred ultrafiltration cells,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 57, pp. 401–406, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  17. R. Tuinier, P. Zoon, C. Olieman, M. A. C. Stuart, G. J. Fleer, and C. G. De Kruif, “Isolation and physical characterization of an exocellular polysaccharide,” Biopolymers, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Levander, M. Svensson, and P. Rådström, “Small-scale analysis of exopolysaccharides from Streptococcus thermophilus grown in a semi-defined medium,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. L. Zhang, J. Zhou, G. Yang, and J. Chen, “Preparative fractionation of polysaccharides by columns packedwith regenerated cellulose gels,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 816, pp. 131–136, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. Comte, G. Guibaud, and M. Baudu, “Relations between extraction protocols for activated sludge extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and EPS complexation properties: Part I. Comparison of the efficiency of eight EPS extraction methods,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 38, no. 1-2, pp. 237–245, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  21. L. Domínguez, M. Rodríguez, and D. Prats, “Effect of different extraction methods on bound EPS from MBR sludges. Part I: Influence of extraction methods over three-dimensional EEM fluorescence spectroscopy fingerprint,” Desalination, vol. 261, no. 1-2, pp. 19–26, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  22. I. Bourven, E. Joussein, and G. Guibaud, “Characterisation of the mineral fraction in extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from activated sludges extracted by eight different methods,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, no. 14, pp. 7124–7130, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  23. P. D’Abazac, F. Bordas, E. Joussein, E. D. van Hullebusch, P. N. Lens, and G. Guibaud, “Metal binding properties of extracellular polymeric substances extracted from anaerobic granular sludges,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 4509–4519, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  24. J. P. L. Kenney and J. B. Fein, “Importance of extracellular polysaccharides on proton and Cd binding to bacterial biomass: A comparative study,” Chemical Geology, vol. 286, pp. 109–117, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  25. W. Chen, W.-P. Wang, H.-S. Zhang, and Q. Huang, “Optimization of ultrasonic-assisted extraction of water-soluble polysaccharides from Boletus edulis mycelia using response surface methodology,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 614–619, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. C. Zeng, Z. Zhang, H. Gao, L. R. Jia, and W. Y. Chen, “Characterization of antioxidant polysaccharides from Auricularia auricular using microwave-assisted extraction,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 694–700, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Palanisamy, L. Aldars-García, A. Gil-Ramírez et al., “Pressurized water extraction of β‐glucan enriched fractions with bile acids‐binding capacities obtained from edible mushrooms,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 391–400, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Ziadi, Y. Touhami, M. Achour, P. Thonart, and M. Hamdi, “The effect of heat stress on freeze-drying and conservation of Lactococcus,” Biochemical Engineering Journal, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 141–145, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. T. Bouzaine, T. Elmajdoub, P. H. Thonart, and M. Hamdi, “Selection de bactéries lactiques probiotiques d'origine animale,” Microbiologie et Hygiène Alimentaire, vol. 46, pp. 24–29, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. Ziadi, S. Mhir, N. Kbaier, M. Hamdi, and A. Ferchichi, “Microbiological analysis and screening of lactic acid bacteria from Tunisian date palm sap,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 2929–2935, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  31. I. Trabelsi, S. Ben Sliman, H. Chaabane, and R. Ben Salah, “Purification and characterization of a novel exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus sp. Ca6,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 74, pp. 541–546, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  32. D. Pan and X. Mei, “Antioxidant activity of an exopolysaccharide purified from Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactis 12,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 80, no. 3, pp. 908–914, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  33. X. Feng, Y. Jianming, T. Tesfaye, D. Floyd, and W. Donghai, “Qualitative and quantitative analysis of lignocellulosic biomass using infrared techniques: A mini-review,” Applied Energy, vol. 104, pp. 801–809, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  34. E. Wiercigroch, E. Szafraniec, K. Czamara et al., “Raman and infrared spectroscopy of carbohydrates: A review,” Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, vol. 185, pp. 317–335, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. Dubois, K. A. Gilles, J. K. Hamilton, P. A. Rebers, and F. Smith, “Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 28, pp. 350–356, 1956. View at: Google Scholar
  36. M. M. Bradford, “A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 72, no. 1-2, pp. 248–254, 1976. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. P. S. Rimada and A. G. Abraham, “Comparative study of different methodologiesto determine the exopolysaccharide produced by kefir grains in milk and whey,” Le Lait, vol. 83, pp. 97–87, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  38. E. Knoshaug, J. A. Ahlgren, and J. E. Trempy, “Growth associated exopolysaccharide expression in Lactococcus lactis subspecies cremoris Ropy352,” Journal of Dairy Science, vol. 83, no. 4, pp. 633–640, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  39. H. Maalej, C. Boisset, N. Hmidet, L. Buon, A. Heyraud, and M. Nasri, “Purification and structural data of a highly substituted exopolysaccharide from Pseudomonas stutzeri AS22,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 112, pp. 404–411, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Wang, X. Zhao, Z. Tian, Y. Yang, and Z. Yang, “Characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus plantarum YW11 isolated from Tibet Kefir,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 125, pp. 16–25, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  41. S. V. N. Vijayendra, G. Palanivel, S. Mahadevamma, and R. N. Tharanathan, “Physico-chemical characterization of an exopolysaccharide produced by a non-ropy strain of Leuconostoc sp. CFR 2181 isolated from dahi, an Indian traditional lactic fermented milk product,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 300–307, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  42. V. P. Hanko and J. S. Rohrer, “Determination of carbohydrates, sugar alcohols, and glycols in cell cultures and fermentation broths using high-performance anion-exchange chromatography with pulsed amperometric detection,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 283, no. 2, pp. 192–199, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. P. Kamerling, G. J. Gerwig, J. F. Vliegenthart, and J. R. Clamp, “Characterization by gas-liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and proton-magnetic-resonance spectroscopy of pertrimethylsilyl methyl glycosides obtained in the methanolysis of glycoproteins and glycopeptides,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 151, no. 3, pp. 491–495, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Montreuil, S. Bouquelet, H. Debray, B. Fournet, G. Spik, and G. Strecker, “Glycoproteins,” in Carbohydrate Analysis: A Practical Approach, M. F. Chaplin and J. F. Kennedy, Eds., pp. 143–204, Oxford University press, New York, NY, USA, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  45. R. van Kranenburg, J. D. Marugg, van Swam II, N. J. Willem, and W. M. de Vos, “Molecular characterization of the plasmid-encoded eps gene cluster essential for exopolysaccharide biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 387–397, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  46. R. van Kranenburg, I. I. van Swam, J. D. Marugg, M. Kleerebezem, and W. M. de Vos, “Exopolysaccharide Biosynthesis in Lactococcus lactis NIZO B40: Functional Analysis of the Glycosyltransferase Genes Involved in Synthesis of the Polysaccharide Backbone,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 338–340, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  47. A. Forde and G. F. Fitzgerald, “Molecular organization of exopolysaccharide (EPS) encoding genes on the lactococcal bacteriophage adsorption blocking plasmid, pCI658,” Plasmid, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 130–142, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  48. Y. Wang, C. Li, P. Liu, Z. Ahmed, P. Xiao, and X. Bai, “Physical characterization of exopolysaccharide produced by Lactobacillus plantarum KF5 isolated from Tibet Kefir,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 895–903, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  49. C. Li, W. Li, X. Chen et al., “Microbiological, physicochemical and rheological properties of fermented soymilk produced with exopolysaccharide (EPS) producing lactic acid bacteria strains,” LWT - Food Science and Technology, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 477–485, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  50. GL. Cote, J. Ahlgren, and A. Kirk-Othmer, Microbial polysaccharides, in Encyclopedia of chemical technology, John Wiley and Sons Inc, New York, NY, USA, 4th edition, 1995.
  51. A. D. Welman and I. S. Maddox, “Exopolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria: perspectives and challenges,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 269–274, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  52. M. T. Dueñas-Chasco, M. A. Rodríguez-Carvajal, P. Tejero-Mateo, J. L. Espartero, A. Irastorza-Iribas, and A. M. Gil-Serrano, “Structural analysis of the exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus spp. G-77,” Carbohydrate Research, vol. 307, no. 1-2, pp. 125–133, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. B. Degeest and L. De Vuyst, “Indication that the Nitrogen Source Influences Both Amount and Size of Exopolysaccharides Produced by Streptococcus thermophilus LY03 and Modelling of the Bacterial Growth and Exopolysaccharide Production in a Complex Medium,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 2863–2870, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  54. P. L. Pham, I. Dupont, D. Roy, G. Lapointe, and J. Cerning, “Production of Exopolysaccharide by Lactobacillus rhamnosus R and Analysis of Its Enzymatic Degradation during Prolonged Fermentation,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 66, no. 6, pp. 2302–2310, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  55. G. H. Van Geel-Schutten, E. J. Faber, E. Smit et al., “Biochemical and Structural Characterization of the Glucan and Fructan Exopolysaccharides Synthesized by the Lactobacillus reuteri Wild-Type Strain and by Mutant Strains,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 3008–3014, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  56. R. Tallon, P. Bressollier, and M. C. Urdaci, “Isolation and characterization of two exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus plantarum EP56,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 154, no. 10, pp. 705–712, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  57. L. Zhang, C. Liu, D. Li, Y. Zhao, X. Zhang, and X. Zeng, “Antioxidant activity of an exopolysaccharide isolated from Lactobacillus plantarum C88,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 54, pp. 270–275, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. J. Wang, H. Ai, and Liu M., “Enhanced welan gum production using cane molasses as substrate by Alcaligenes sp. ATCC31555,” New Biotechnology, vol. 31, p. s40, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  59. M. R. S. Melo, J. P. A. Feitosa, A. L. P. Freitas, and R. C. M. De Paula, “Isolation and characterization of soluble sulfated polysaccharide from the red seaweed Gracilaria cornea,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 491–498, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. S. Ye, M. Zhang, H. Yang et al., “Biosorption of Cu2+, Pb2+ and Cr6+ by a novel exopolysaccharide from Arthrobacter ps-5,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 101, pp. 50–56, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  61. Z. Chi, Su. CD, and Lu. WD, “A new exopolysaccharide produced by marine Cyanothece sp. 113,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 98, no. 6, pp. 1329–1332, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  62. O. Braissant, A. W. Decho, K. M. Przekop et al., “Characteristics and turnover of exopolymeric substances in a hypersaline microbial mat,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 293–307, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Manel Ziadi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

3050 Views | 809 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.