Research Article
Impact of Coordinated-Bilateral Physical Activities on Attention and Concentration in School-Aged Children
Table 3
Results of post hoc comparisons between groups in five dependent variables.
| | Dependent Variables | Between Groups | F | df | P |
| | Processing Speed (TN) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | .925 | 1 | .340 | | | CBPA vs. Control | 6.876 | 1 | .010 | | | Fitbit-O vs. Control | 1.842 | 1 | .178 |
| | Focused Attention (TN-E) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | 1.73 | 1 | .194 | | | CBPA vs. Control | 10.688 | 1 | .002 | | | Fitbit-O vs. Control | 1.874 | 1 | .175 |
| | Concentration performance (CP) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | 24.162 | 1 | .000 | | | CBPA vs. Control | 26.454 | 1 | .000 | | | Fitbit-O vs. Control | .001 | 1 | .976 |
| | Accuracy (Error %) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | .538 | 1 | .466 | | | CBPA vs. Control | .297 | 1 | .587 | | | Fitbit-O vs. Control | .001 | 1 | .976 |
| | Attention Span (FR) | CBPA vs. Fitbit-O | 6.891 | 1 | .011 | | | CBPA vs. Control | 14.090 | 1 | .000 | | | Fitbit-O vs. Control | 0.568 | 1 | .453 |
|
|
