Review Article

Neutrophil Lymphocyte Ratio and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Pooled odds ratio of cardiovascular between high and low NLR.

AuthorYearNLRCVDNon-CVDOR (95%CI)
CutoffLow NLRHigh NLRLow NLRHigh NLR

Coronary artery disease

Sari [13]20152.30----1.51 (1.15, 2.00)
Aygün [14]20152.054056109871.75 (1.07, 2.88)
Acar [15]20152.25----2.30 (1.19, 4.43)
Verdoia [16]20152.033497831031371.69 (1.27, 2.24)
Yu [18]20162.41----1.69 (1.48,1.94)
Verdoia [20]20161.8068221722516331.26 (1.07, 1.49)
Chittawar [23]20172.60281975813.59 (2.81, 65.76)
Guo [24]20172.45----2.01 (0.88, 4.63)
Sharma [25]20172.13----1.49 (0.94, 2.37)

Pooled OR (95% CI)1.62 (1.38, 1.91)

Acute coronary syndrome

Yu [18]20162.42----1.65 (1.43, 1.90)
Zazula [27]20085.70----4.51 (1.51, 13.45)
Nordestgaard [28]2010-----1.52 (0.83, 2.79)
Caimi [29]20152.19394311121.01 (0.40, 2.55)
Göktaş [32]20183.0402326111.36 (0.57, 3.25)

Pooled OR (95% CI)1.64 (1.30-2.05)

Stroke

Saliba [33]20153.156493322404978821.56 (1.36, 1.79)
Ertas [34]20133.17201964232.64 (1.20, 5.81)
Akil [36]2014-----8.95 (1.88, 42.61)
Suh [39]20173.0023,530219936232.64 (1.71, 4.08)

Pooled OR (95% CI)2.36 (1.44, 3.89)

Composite outcomes

Tsai [43]2007-----1.52 (0.96, 2.40)
Azab [44]20132.402020623892.66 (1.39, 5.09)
Solak [45]20132.803631095045.78 (13.71, 152.85)
Abe [46]20153.67102633175.05 (1.98, 12.86)
Quiros-Roldan [47]20161.202290109122511.98 (1.24, 3.18)

Pooled OR (95% CI)3.86 (1.73, 8.64)

CI, confidence interval; CVD, cardiovascular disease; NLR, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio; OR, odds ratio.