Research Article

Unsupervised versus Supervised Identification of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Localized Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Data Clustering and Mahalanobis Distance Approach

Table 2

Clinical descriptors and prognostic reclassification. Each variable was reclassified according to the prognostic information deriving from literature data and clinical expertise. Each reclassification group could range from 0 (better prognosis) to 3 (worst prognosis). For more details on the recoding, see the Appendix.

Clinical characteristicsValuesReclassification

Age (years)<501
51–601.5
61–652
66–702.5
70–753

HistologyWDLPS, SFT1
Myxoid LPS1.5
Pleomorphic LPS, fibrosarcoma2
LMS, DDLPS2.5
MPNST, NOS sarcoma3

FNCLLC gradingG11
G22
G33

Size (cm)<101
11–151.5
16–202
20–302.5
30–453

Response after chemo- and radiotherapyPR1
SD2
PD3

Type of resectionNo resection1
R0/R12
R23

DFI (months)Never relapsed0
>360.5
24–361
12–241.5
6–122
0–62.5
Never NED3

Relapse patternNo relapse0
Local1
Distant2
Local + distant3

First type of retreatment at recurrenceSurgery, surgery + RT1
CT followed by surgery1.5
CT or RT2
Debulking surgery, no surgery3