In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of<i> Candida</i> Species Isolated from Iranian Patients with Denture Stomatitis

Mahdavi Omran, Saeid; Rezaei Dastjerdi, Maryam; Zuashkiani, Maryam; Moqarabzadeh, Vahid; Taghizadeh-Armaki, Mojtaba

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3086586

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 3086586 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3086586

In Vitro Antifungal Susceptibility of Candida Species Isolated from Iranian Patients with Denture Stomatitis

Saeid Mahdavi Omran,¹Maryam Rezaei Dastjerdi,²Maryam Zuashkiani,²Vahid Moqarabzadeh,³and Mojtaba Taghizadeh-Armaki⁴

Academic Editor: Nobuo Kanazawa

Received19 Jan 2018

Revised21 Mar 2018

Accepted15 Apr 2018

Published16 May 2018

Abstract

Background. Candida-associated denture stomatitis (CADS) is a common fungal infection in people who wear dentures. The main objective of this study was to make molecular identification of causative agents of CADS and in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) in the Iranian patients with denture stomatitis. Methods. A total of 134 Candida spp. were obtained from patients with denture stomatitis. The Candida spp. were identified using a polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) involving the universal internal transcribed spacer (ITS1 and ITS4) primers, which were subjected to digestion with MspI and BlnI restriction enzymes. The in vitro antifungal susceptibility of Candida spp. to fluconazole (FLC), terbinafine (TRB), itraconazole (ITC), voriconazole (VRC), posaconazole (POS), ketoconazole (KET), amphotericin B (AMB), and caspofungin (CAS) was evaluated using the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M27-A3 and M27-S4 guidelines. Results. Overall, C. albicans was the most commonly isolated species (; 62.6%), followed by C. glabrata (; 17.2%), C. tropicalis (; 12%), and C. parapsilosis (; 8.2%). Posaconazole had the lowest geometric mean minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (0.03 μg/ml), followed by AMB (0.05 μg/ml), ITC (0.08 μg/ml), VRC (0.11 μg/ml), CAS (0.12 μg/ml), KET (0.15 μg/ml), and FLC (0.26 μg/ml). Discussion. Our study showed that C. albicans was most prevalent in Iranian patients with CADS and was susceptible to both azoles and amphotericin B. In addition, POS could be an appropriate alternative to the current antifungal agents used for the treatment of CADS, as well as in the treatment of recurrent candidiasis.

1. Introduction

Candida-associated denture stomatitis (CADS) is a chronic atrophic complication of the oral cavity that mainly affects people who wear removable dentures [1]. Several evidence-based studies have shown that Candida albicans is the main etiological agent of denture stomatitis (DS), followed by C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata [2–4]. The early diagnosis of pathogenic fungal agents and the determination of their susceptibility to antifungal drugs are critical to the treatment of the infection and to establish preventive healthcare-associated strategies [5, 6].

In recent years, non-albicans Candida infections and antifungal resistant isolates have increased; thus, developing a reliable diagnostic method is essential for the management of candidiasis [7, 8].

A molecular-based method, such as polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP), is a promising technique that is used in the identification of pathogenic Candida spp. [9].

The management of CADS depends on a wide-ranging treatment strategy [10], which includes detecting and eradicating possible significant risk factors, preventing a systemic Candida infection, and reducing any associated discomfort [11, 12]. The use of oral formulations of antimicrobial agents, such as amphotericin B (AMB), nystatin (NYS), and miconazole (MIC), and systemic drugs, such as fluconazole (FLC), voriconazole (VRC), posaconazole (POS), itraconazole (ITC), and ketoconazole (KET), has been shown to be effective in the treatment of CADS [13–16]. Echinocandins, such as caspofungin (CAS), are a class of antifungal drugs that appear to be highly effective against all Candida spp., including those that are less sensitive or are resistant to FLC and/or ITC [15]. However, previous studies have described the recurrence and clinical relapse of CADS after treatment [1, 17, 18]. Having sufficient information about the antifungal susceptibility testing (AFST) of the Candida spp. involved in CADS may help in the selection of alternative antifungal treatments for recurrent oral candidiasis. In the current study, we evaluated the in vitro AFST of a collection of molecularly identified Candida spp. isolated from Iranian patients with DS.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Collection Process

After an examination of the oral cavity, denture samples were obtained by scraping sterile swabs across the inner surface of the denture. In a period of 3 years (2013 to 2016), a total of 134 clinical isolates were collected from 103 patients aged 53–86 years affected with DS. All samples were streaked on the Sabouraud dextrose agar (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and incubated at 35°C for 7 days. All suspected colonies were detected by CHROMagar Candida (CHROMagar, Paris, France) and PCR-RFLP methods. Each isolate was preserved in the tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and then stored in the culture collection of the Department of Medical Mycology, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

2.2. Genomic DNA Extraction and PCR-RFLP

The total genomic DNA from the yeast was removed using the method described by Yamada et al., which involved cell disruption with glass beads followed by extraction with phenol–chloroform and precipitation with ethanol [19].

Oligonucleotide primer sequences including ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′) were used in this study [20]. Amplification was performed on a thermal cycler (C1000; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). The amplified products were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels containing 0.5 mg/ml of ethidium bromide and then analyzed under UV light using a gel-doc system (Bio-Rad, USA). The breakdown of the amplified products involved the restriction enzymes BlnI and/or MspI (Table 1). The digests of the PCR fragments were electrophoresed on 1.5% agarose gels. In this study, C. albicans ATCC 10231 and C. dubliniensis CBS 2747 were used as quality control strains.

2.3. Antifungal Susceptibility Testing

The following antifungal agents were evaluated: AMB (Bristol-Myers Squib, Woerden, Netherlands), FLC, ITC, VRC, KET, and TRB (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), POS (Schering-Plough Corp., Oss, Netherlands), and CAS (Pfizer, Capelle aan den Ijssel, Netherlands). In vitro AFST was performed according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) M27-A3 and M27-S4 guidelines [21, 22]. Each antifungal agent was prepared separately. The final concentration of FLC ranged from 0.063 to 64 μg/ml. The final concentrations of AMB, ITC, VRC, POS, and KET ranged from 0.016 to 16 μg/ml, while the final concentrations of CAS and TRB were 0.008–8 μg/ml and 0.12–128 μg/ml, respectively. The drugs were diluted in RPMI-1640 Medium (Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) and buffered to pH 7.0 with 0.165 M N-morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and L-glutamine without bicarbonate to yield twofold their final concentrations. The primary Candida spp. were cultured on potato dextrose agar (PDA; Difco, Leeuwarden, Netherlands) and incubated for 3 days at 35°C. Once mature colonies were observed, a conidial inoculum was made using a sterile saline solution. A spectrophotometer at 530 nm was used to adjust the inoculum to a range of 2.5–5 × 10⁶ CFU/ml. The drug containing 96-well plastic microplates was inoculated with this suspension and incubated at 35°C for 24–48 h. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for FLC, VRC, CAS, ITC, and POS were determined according to the CLSI M27-A3 and M27-S4 guidelines [21, 22]. Isolates that responded to ≤1 μg/ml MIC for AMB were recognized as susceptible isolates according to the CLSI M27-S3 guideline [23]. The breakpoint was not determined for TRB; however, several studies have reported resistance breakpoints ≥ 8 μg/ml [24, 25]. The breakpoint values for KET were not defined by the CLSI and, thus, the resistant breakpoint of ≥4 μg/ml which was determined by Mulu et al. (2013) was used [26]. Isolates from C. krusei (ATCC 6258) and C. parapsilosis (ATCC 22019) were used as quality control strains.

2.4. Data and Statistical Analysis

The geometric mean (GM), MIC₅₀, and MIC₉₀ for the antifungal agents against Candida spp. were calculated using EXCEL (Microsoft Office Excel 2003 SP3, Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, USA).

3. Results

C. albicans was the predominant species (; 62.6%), followed by C. glabrata (; 17.2%), C. tropicalis (; 12%), and C. parapsilosis (; 8.2%). Table 2 summarizes the GM of the MICs, the MIC ranges, MIC₅₀, and MIC₉₀ for the antifungal drugs against all Candida isolates. The GM of MICs for drugs across all strains was, in increasing order, 0.03 μg/ml (POS), 0.05 μg/ml (AMB), 0.08 μg/ml (ITC), 0.11 μg/ml (VRC), 0.12 μg/ml (CAS), 0.15 μg/ml (KET), 0.26 μg/ml (FLC), and 65.00 μg/mL (TRB). All C. albicans isolates (100%) were found to be susceptible to AMB, VRC, POS, KET, and ITC; however, 13 isolates (15.5%) were resistant to FLC. All C. parapsilosis isolates (100%) were susceptible to FLC, while only 4 isolates (17.4%) of C. glabrata and 2 isolates (12.5%) of C. tropicalis were resistant to FLC. The resistance rates for VRC of C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. glabrata were 18.7% (3/16), 8.6% (2/23), and 9.1% (1/11), respectively. The ITC MICs for 6 isolates (37.5%) of C. tropicalis and 4 isolates (36.4%) of C. parapsilosis were ≥1 μg/ml. The resistance rates for AMB in C. tropicalis and C. parapsilosis were 12.5% (2/16) and 45.5% (5/11), respectively. Out of 134 isolates, 1 isolate of C. tropicalis (≥4 μg/ml) was resistant to KET. The resistance rates for CAS in C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. albicans were 56.5% (13/23), 9.1% (1/11), and 2.3% (2/84), respectively. Overall, all Candida spp. had the highest in vitro antifungal susceptibility to ITC, POS, and CAS. However, Candida spp. showed a lack of susceptibility to TRB.

4. Discussion

Dentures in the oral cavity are considered to be a reservoir of Candida spp. and, thus, are a predisposing factor for DS in patients, as well as a potential origin of reinfection [27]. CADS is an infection initiated by the oral colonization of Candida spp.; the most frequently identified species is C. albicans, although C. glabrata, C. guilliermondii, C. parapsilosis, C. krusei, and C. tropicalis are less commonly seen [28, 29]. In agreement with other studies, our research found that C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and C. glabrata caused CADS [30–32]. The recommended drug of choice to treat CADS in patients without an underlying disease commonly includes a NYS suspension or a clotrimazole tablet. However, a topical application of an azole, such as FLC or ITC, can also be used to prevent persistent or chronic fungal infections in the patients [33, 34].

Several studies reported the emergence of antifungal resistance to azoles, which has been associated with multiple episodes of recurrence [16, 35–37]. In the current study, 15.5% of C. albicans (13/84) was observed to be resistant to FLC. In contrast with our data, Abaci and Haliki-Uztan (2011) reported that 59.4% of C. albicans were resistant to FLC [24].

AMB, also used in the management of CADS, proved effective against Candida spp. [1]. Besides, the findings obtained in the present study were in agreement with the results by Wingeter et al. (2007) [38] regarding the susceptibility of oral Candida strains to AMB.

AMB-resistant non-albicans isolates were reported from several previous studies [24, 39]. We also found that 12.5% (2/16) of C. tropicalis and 45.5% (5/11) of C. parapsilosis isolates showed resistance patterns to AMB. The good in vitro activities of POS and VRC have been previously reported against Candida spp. obtained from oral candidiasis patients [40–43].

As shown in Table 2, POS was the most effective drug in vitro with GM MICs of 0.01 μg/ml, 0.19 μg/ml, 0.05 μg/ml, and 0.05 μg/ml for C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. tropicalis, and C. parapsilosis, respectively. Marcos-Arias et al. (2012) previously showed that the GM MICs for POS were 0.036 μg/ml for C. parapsilosis, 0.062 μg/ml for C. albicans, 0.085 μg/ml for C. tropicalis, and 0.498 μg/ml for C. glabrata [16]. Several other studies also demonstrated that POS and VRC were strong antifungal agents against Candida spp. [40–44].

In our study, all non-albicans Candida isolates were susceptible to POS, although only 88% these isolates were susceptible to VRC. In line with the Marcos-Arias et al. (2012), VRC was effective against 95.5% of strains [16]. In addition, the GM MICs for ITC were 0.04 μg/ml for C. albicans, 0.26 μg/ml for C. glabrata, 0.27 μg/ml for C. tropicalis, and 0.46 μg/ml for C. parapsilosis. Other studies have shown that ITC is useful for treating patients with DS [27, 45, 46].

Dorocka-Bobkowska and Konopka (2007) reported that AMB, FLC, and ITC were effective against 100%, 88.7%, and 87.3% of C. albicans and 79.6%, 71.4%, and 79.6% of other Candida strains, respectively [10]. In the present study, AMB, FLC, and ITC were effective against 100%, 84.5%, and 100% of C. albicans and 86%, 88%, and 80% of non-albicans Candida isolates, respectively. Caspofungin is known as an echinocandin fungicidal antifungal agent against most Candida spp. [15].

Some data are available on the AFST of Candida spp. isolated from denture-associated stomatitis (DAS) to echinocandins [15, 47]. In the present study, only 2 isolates (2.3%) of the 84 isolates of C. albicans were resistant to CAS. We also found that 14 isolates (28%) of the non-albicans Candida strains were resistant to CAS.

In the present study, TRB was not found to be effective against Candida spp. Ryder et al. (1998) also reported that TRB was not an active drug against C. glabrata and C. tropicalis [25].

Our results revealed that the tested antifungal showed good activity for most isolates; however, variability observed among some isolates and resistance to drugs highlight the need for AFST as a monitor to management of therapeutic procedure.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, all Candida spp. isolated from patients wearing dentures were susceptible to POS and AMB. As an antifungal, POS could be a suitable alternative to the present antifungal agents used for the management of CADS and could be also used in the treatment of recurrent candidiasis.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors of this paper reported no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Dr. Saeid Mahdavi Omran (supervisor) conceived and designed the experiments. Dr. Mojtaba Taghizadeh Armaki performed the experiments. Vahid Moqarabzadeh analyzed the data. DD. Maryam Zuashkiani and Maryam Rezaie Dastjerdi conducted the sampling procedure. All authors helped to write the paper.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Infection Diseases Research Center (IDRC), Babol University of Medical Sciences (BUMS), Babol, Iran (Contract no. IRCT2013042713136N1).

References

C. Salerno, M. Pascale, M. Contaldo et al., “Candida-associated denture stomatitis,” Medicina Oral Patología Oral y Cirugía Bucal, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. e139–e143, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Martins, M. Henriques, A. P. Ribeiro et al., “Oral Candida carriage of patients attending a dental clinic in Braga, Portugal,” Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 119–124, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Marcos-Arias, J. L. Vicente, I. H. Sahand et al., “Isolation of Candida dubliniensis in denture stomatitis,” Archives of Oral Biolog, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 127–131, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Zomorodian, N. N. Haghighi, N. Rajaee et al., “Assessment of Candida species colonization and denture-related stomatitis in complete denture wearers,” Medical Mycology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 208–211, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. A. Kanafani and J. R. Perfect, “Resistance to antifungal agents: mechanisms and clinical impact,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 120–128, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Badiee and Z. Hashemizadeh, “Opportunistic invasive fungal infections: Diagnosis & clinical management,” Indian Journal of Medical Research, vol. 139, pp. 195–204, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Kaur, M. S. Dhakad, R. Goyal, and R. Kumar, “Emergence of non-albicans Candida species and antifungal resistance in intensive care unit patients,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Biomedicine, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 455–460, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kołaczkowska and M. Kołaczkowski, “Drug resistance mechanisms and their regulation in non-albicans Candida species,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 1438–1450, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zarrinfar, S. Kaboli, S. Dolatabadi, and R. Mohammadi, “Rapid detection of Candida species in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with pulmonary symptoms,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 172–176, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Dorocka-Bobkowska and K. Konopka, “Susceptibility of Candida isolates from denture-related stomatitis to antifungal agents in vitro,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 504–506, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
Y.-j. Zhou and G.-h. Li, “Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Candidiasis: Society of America,” Chinese Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy, vol. 3, p. 4, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
N. S. Dar-Odeh, M. Al-Beyari, and O. A. Abu-Hammad, “The role of antifungal drugs in the management of denture-associated stomatitis,” International Arabic Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, vol. 2, no. 1, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Martínez-Beneyto, P. López-Jornet, A. Velandrino-Nicolás, and V. Jornet-García, “Use of antifungal agents for oral candidiasis: results of a national survey.,” International Journal of Dental Hygiene, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47–52, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Lyon, L. M. Moreira, M. A. G. Cardoso, J. Saade, and M. A. Resende, “Antifungal suscepitibility profile of Candida spp. oral isolates obtained from denture wearers,” Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 668–672, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. V. Sanitá, E. G. De Oliveira Mima, A. C. Pavarina, J. H. Jorge, A. L. Machado, and C. E. Vergani, “Susceptibility profile of a Brazilian yeast stock collection of Candida species isolated from subjects with Candida-associated denture stomatitis with or without diabetes,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 562–569, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Marcos-Arias, E. Eraso, L. Madariaga, A. J. Carrillo-Muñoz, and G. Quindós, “In Vitro Activities of New Triazole Antifungal Agents, Posaconazole and Voriconazole, Against Oral Candida Isolates from Patients Suffering from Denture Stomatitis,” Mycopathologia, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. H. Figueiral, P. Fonseca, M. M. Lopes, E. Pinto, T. Pereira-Leite, and B. Sampaio-Maia, “Effect of denture-related stomatitis fluconazole treatment on oral Candida albicans susceptibility profile and genotypic variability,” The Open Dentistry Journal , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 46–51, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Bissell, D. H. Felix, and D. Wray, “Comparative trial of fluconazole and amphotericin in the treatment of denture stomatitis,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 35–39, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yamada, K. Makimura, H. Merhendi et al., “Comparison of different methods for extraction of mitochondrial DNA from human pathogenic yeasts,” Japanese Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 122–125, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Shokohi, M. B. Hashemi Soteh, Z. S. Pouri, M. T. Hedayati, and S. Mayahi, “Identification of Candida species using PCR-RFLP in cancer patients in Iran,” Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 147–151, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, CLSI Document M27-A3: Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, Approved Standard, CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2008a.
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, CLSI document M27-S4: Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, Approved Standard, CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2012.
Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute, CLSI document M27-S3: Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, Approved Standard, CLSI, Wayne, PA, USA, 2008b.
O. Abaci and A. Haliki-Uztan, “Investigation of the susceptibility of Candida species isolated from denture wearers to different antifungal antibiotics,” African Journal of Microbiology Research, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 1398–1403, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
N. S. Ryder, S. Wagner, and I. Leitner, “In vitro activities of terbinafine against cutaneous isolates of Candida albicans and other pathogenic yeasts,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1057–1061, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Mulu, A. Kassu, B. Anagaw et al., “Frequent detection of ‘azole’ resistant Candida species among late presenting AIDS patients in northwest Ethiopia,” BMC Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, article 82, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Cross, D. W. Williams, C. P. Sweeney, M. S. Jackson, M. A. O. Lewis, and J. Bagg, “Evaluation of the recurrence of denture stomatitis and Candida colonization in a small group of patients who received itraconazole,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 97, no. 3, pp. 351–358, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. P. Samaranayake, W. Keung Leung, and L. Jin, “Oral mucosal fungal infections,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 39–59, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Lee, S. W. Kim, and Y. J. Bang, “A study on the distribution of oral candidal isolates in diabetics,” Korean Journal of Medical Mycology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 139–148, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Silva, M. C. Henriques, A. Hayes, R. Oliveira, J. Azeredo, and D. W. Williams, “Candida glabrata and Candida albicans co-infection of an in vitro oral epithelium,” Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 421–427, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Coco, J. Bagg, L. J. Cross, A. Jose, J. Cross, and G. Ramage, “Mixed Candida albicans and Candida glabrata populations associated with the pathogenesis of denture stomatitis,” Oral microbiology and immunology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 377–383, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Gendreau and Z. G. Loewy, “Epidemiology and etiology of denture stomatitis,” Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 251–260, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. B. Song, M. K. Suh, G. Y. Ha, and H. Kim, “Antifungal susceptibility testing with etest for Candida species isolated from patients with oral candidiasis,” Annals of Dermatology, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 715–720, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Niimi, N. A. Firth, and R. D. Cannon, “Antifungal drug resistance of oral fungi,” Odontology, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 15–25, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Carvalhinho, A. M. Costa, A. C. Coelho, E. Martins, and A. Sampaio, “Susceptibilities of Candida albicans mouth isolates to antifungal agents, essentials oils and mouth rinses,” Mycopathologia, vol. 174, no. 1, pp. 69–76, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Koga-Ito, J. P. Lyon, and M. A. De Resende, “Comparison between E-test and CLSI broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans oral isolates,” Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 7–10, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Bergendal, K. Holmberg, and C.-E. Nord, “Yeast colonization in the oral cavity and feces in patients with denture stomatitis,” Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 37–45, 1979.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Wingeter, E. Guilhermetti, C. S. Shinobu, I. Takaki, and T. I. E. Svidzinski, “Microbiological identification and in vitro sensitivity of Candida isolates from the oral cavity of HIV-positive individuals,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Tropical Medicine, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 272–276, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ellis, “Amphotericin B: spectrum and resistance,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 49, 1, pp. 7–10, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Quindós, A. J. Carrillo-Muñoz, E. Eraso, E. Cantón, and J. Pemán, “In vitro antifungal activity of voriconazole: New data after the first years of clinical experience,” Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 198–208, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bagg, M. P. Sweeney, A. N. Davies, M. S. Jackson, and S. Brailsford, “Voriconazole susceptibility of yeasts isolated from the mouths of patients with advanced cancer,” Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 959–964, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. O. S. Vargas, E. Eraso, A. J. Carrillo-Muñoz, J. M. Aguirre, L. A. Gaitán-Cepeda, and G. Quindos, “In vitro activity of voriconazole against Mexican oral yeast isolates: Original article,” Mycoses, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 200–203, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A.-J. Carillo-Muñoz, G. Quindós, M. Ruesga et al., “Antifungal activity of posaconazole compared with fluconazole and amphotericin B against yeasts from oropharyngeal candidiasis and other infections,” Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 317–319, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Carrillo-Muñoz, C. Tur-Tur, J. M. Hernández-Molina et al., “Antifungal activity of posaconazole against Candida spp. and non-Candida clinical yeasts isolates,” Revista Española de Quimioterapia, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 122–125, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Martin-Mazuelos, A. I. Aller, M. J. Romero et al., “Response to fluconazole and itraconazole of Candida spp. in denture stomatitis,” Mycoses, vol. 40, no. 7-8, pp. 283–289, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. J. Cross, J. Bagg, and T. C. Aitchison, “Efficacy of the cyclodextrin liquid preparation of itraconazole in treatment of denture stomatitis: Comparison with itraconazole capsules,” Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 425–427, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. W. Wong, R. Y. T. Kao, K. Y. Yuen et al., “In vitro and in vivo activity of a novel antifungal small molecule against Candida infections,” PLoS ONE, vol. 9, no. 1, Article ID e85836, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Saeid Mahdavi Omran et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2392

Downloads

1402

Citations