BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Cancer Diagnostic and Predictive Biomarkers 2018

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 3205125 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3205125

Cystathionine β-Synthase in Physiology and Cancer

Academic Editor: Maria L. Tornesello
Received23 Mar 2018
Accepted29 May 2018
Published28 Jun 2018

Abstract

Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) regulates homocysteine metabolism and contributes to hydrogen sulfide (H2S) biosynthesis through which it plays multifunctional roles in the regulation of cellular energetics, redox status, DNA methylation, and protein modification. Inactivating mutations in CBS contribute to the pathogenesis of the autosomal recessive disease CBS-deficient homocystinuria. Recent studies demonstrating that CBS promotes colon and ovarian cancer growth in preclinical models highlight a newly identified oncogenic role for CBS. On the contrary, tumor-suppressive effects of CBS have been reported in other cancer types, suggesting context-dependent roles of CBS in tumor growth and progression. Here, we review the physiological functions of CBS, summarize the complexities regarding CBS research in oncology, and discuss the potential of CBS and its key metabolites, including homocysteine and H2S, as potential biomarkers for cancer diagnosis or therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.

1. Introduction

Cystathionine β-synthase (CBS) catalyzes the condensation of homocysteine (Hcy) with serine to form cystathionine, which is the initial and rate-limiting step in the transsulfuration pathway. Cystathionine is subsequently cleaved by the enzyme cystathionine gamma-lyase (CTH) to form cysteine, a precursor of glutathione. Besides this canonical pathway, CBS also participates in the desulfuration reactions that contribute to endogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) production (Figure 1). Thus, CBS acting mainly through control of Hcy and H2S metabolism exerts diverse biological functions including mitochondrial bioenergetics, redox homeostasis, DNA methylation and protein modification. Deregulation of CBS and the associated alterations in Hcy and/or H2S levels leads to a wide range of pathological disturbances in the cardiovascular, immune, and central nervous systems and contributes to disease development, such as CBS-deficient homocystinuria (CBSDH). It is now becoming clear that CBS activity also plays an important but complex role in cancer biology. This review focuses on the current understanding of the functional role of CBS and the derived metabolites Hcy and H2S in cancer pathogenesis and provides insight into the development of novel prognostic markers and therapeutic approaches for cancer patients.

2. CBS Protein Structure and Biological Functions

The human CBS gene encodes a protein of 551 amino acids. The crystal structure of the active form of human CBS, formed by four of 63-kDa subunits, has been fully characterized [1, 2]. Each subunit consists of three structural domains. The N-terminal domain binds to the cofactor heme, which is required for successful protein folding and assembly but not necessary for catalytic activity [3]. The catalytic domain encompasses a binding site for another cofactor, pyridoxal-phosphate (PLP) [4]. The C-terminal regulatory domain contains two CBS motifs (CBS1 and CBS2) that dimerize to form a Bateman domain. This domain is responsible for CBS subunit tetramerization and contains the binding sites for the allosteric activator S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) [1, 5, 6]. In the native quaternary structure, the access of substrates to the catalytic core is occluded by the C-terminal regulatory motifs and the binding of SAM induces a conformational change that improves the access of the substrates to the catalytic site [2]. The autoinhibitory function of the C-terminal regulatory domain is relieved by the C-terminal truncation that generates a 45 kDa isoform with higher basal catalytic activity than the full-length form [1].

CBS is predominantly expressed in the brain, liver, kidney, and pancreas. It is mainly a cytosolic enzyme, but localization in the nucleus [7] and mitochondria [8] had been detected in specific cell types. CBS can be translocated to the mitochondria in response to hypoxia [9] or nucleolar stress [10]. CBS expression is regulated at multiple levels upon different stimuli. For example, hormonal regulation by glucocorticoids increases CBS expression at the transcriptional level in liver cells, a process that may be perturbed by insulin administration through binding to an insulin-sensitive sequence localized on the CBS promoter [11]. In addition, testosterone can regulate CBS expression and activity in renal tissue [12]. Growth/differentiation factors such as EGF, TGF-α, cAMP, and dexamethasone induced CBS protein expression in mouse astrocytes [13]. Hypoxia upregulated CBS expression either via hypoxia-inducible factor- (HIF-) 1 at the transcriptional level [14] or decreased degradation of CBS protein by Lon proteases in the mitochondria [9]. Besides HIF-1, the zinc finger transcription factor SP1 binds to the CBS gene promoter, establishing its role as a key regulator of CBS expression [15, 16]. Furthermore, CBS activity may be enhanced via posttranslational regulation through S-glutathionylation [17] or inhibited via epigenetic downregulation of CBS expression through promoter methylation [18, 19].

CBS plays a critical role in Hcy elimination. Patients with CBS deficiency exhibit elevated Hcy plasma levels at excess of 200 μM compared to 5-15 μM in healthy adults [20]. CBS-deficient homocystinuria (CBSDH) is an autosomal recessive metabolic disease, resulting from inactivating mutations in the CBS gene. CBSDH patients present multiple pathologic changes in the eye, skeleton, central nervous, and vascular systems. Common symptoms in CBSDH patients include thrombosis, osteoporosis, and impaired mental cognitive development (reviewed in [2123]). Administration of high doses of the PLP precursor, pyridoxine, or vitamin B6 is common treatment that ameliorates approximately 50% of clinical symptoms. To date, 164 pathogenic genetic variants have been identified (http://cbs.lf1.cuni.cz/mutations.php) of which the predominant mutations are missense mutations. c.833 T > C (p.I278T) is the most frequent mutation detected in many European populations [24]. The I278T missense mutation and many of the less prevalent mutations likely affect the folding or stability of the CBS protein [25] whereas some mutations such as mutant D444N, a missense mutation in the C-terminal regulatory domain, showed an approximately twofold increase in basal CBS activity but impaired response to SAM stimulation [2]. The pathophysiology of CBS deficiency is still not fully understood. As well as the accumulation of Hcy, CBS defects lead to increased concentrations of methionine and S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH) and depletion of cystathionine and cysteine. These perturbations may act in concert with high Hcy to promote the development and progression of CBSDH (reviewed in [26]).

Accordingly, extensive studies in the mouse models of CBS deficiency showed mice with homozygotic CBS deletion (CBS-/-) died within 4 weeks after birth due to severe hepatic dysfunction and exhibited extremely high levels of circulating Hcy (reviewed in [26, 27]). Wang et al. showed that the neonatal lethality could be rescued by decreasing circulating Hcy levels in a transgenic mouse model with inducible CBS expression [28]. They further found that there may be a threshold effect with Hcy, meaning that moderately lowering homocysteinemia can improve mouse viability during the neonatal period [29]. In support of the Hcy threshold effect, CBS+/- heterozygote mice were fully viable with a 3-fold increase of Hcy levels compared to the 8-fold increase in homozygous mice [30].

3. Homocysteine and H2S, the Major CBS-Derived Metabolites

3.1. Homocysteine

Hcy is a sulfur-containing nonproteinogenic amino acid linked to the metabolism of methionine and cysteine. Methionine is converted to Hcy via S-adenosyl methionine (SAM) and SAH, releasing a methyl group that is used in numerous methylation reactions. Hcy can reform Met by the remethylation pathway either via 5-methyltetrahydrofolate-homocysteine methyltransferase (MTR, 5-methyltetrahydrofolate as the methyl group donor) or betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase (BHMT, betaine as the methyl group donor) (Figure 1). Hcy is also irreversibly metabolized by CBS to cystathionine that subsequently converts to cysteine via CTH in the transsulfuration pathway (Figure 1). Hcy metabolism mainly occurs in the liver and conversion to cystathionine by CBS is a major elimination route of Hcy [31].

Hyperhomocysteinemia (HHcy) is recognized as an independent risk factor for atherosclerotic vascular disease [32]. HHcy may result from mutations in genes encoding enzymes of Hcy biosynthesis and metabolism or deficiencies of vitamin cofactors including vitamin B12 and B6 [33]. The molecular mechanisms underlying HHcy-induced atherosclerosis are complex and multifactorial (Figure 2). Elevated Hcy concentration reduces nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability and causes oxidative stress. HHcy also leads to formation of Hcy thiolactone as a result of error-prone editing by the methionyl-tRNA synthase [34]. This Hcy derivative can cause protein N-homocysteinylation in which the thioester group of thiolactone binds to the lysine residues in proteins, consequently impairing protein function, resulting in unfolded protein response and endoplasmic reticulum stress (reviewed in [35, 36]). Moreover, an elevated Hcy level could lead to accumulation of SAH, a competitive inhibitor of most methyltransferases, consequently inducing DNA hypomethylation [37]. Through this epigenetic mechanism, Hcy has been reported to inhibit endothelial cell growth by decreasing the expression of cyclin A [38], fibroblast growth factor 2 [39], and hTERT expression [40] and by upregulation of platelet-derived growth factors and P66shC [41].

HHcy has also been implicated in the pathogenesis of cancer. Increased release of Hcy by tumor cells is related to their rapid proliferation rate [42]. Hcy accumulation results from defects in methionine synthesis, leading to a methionine-dependent malignant phenotype [43]. A meta-analysis revealed the association of elevated circulating Hcy levels with increased overall risk of cancer [44]. A higher Hcy plasma level has been detected in the patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [44] and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [45]. Although the mechanisms underlying this association between elevated Hcy levels and malignant transformation are unclear, a recent study proposed a mechanism linking Hcy to lipid metabolism and HCC [46]. It demonstrated that Hcy transcriptionally upregulated CYP2J2, a cytochrome P450 (CYP) epoxygenase by stimulating DNA demethylation and increasing SP1/AP1 activity on the promoter of CYP2J2, which promotes epoxyeicosatrienoic acid synthesis and hepatocellular tumorigenesis.

3.2. H2S

Like nitric oxide and carbon monoxide, H2S is a diffusible gaseous transmitter in the human body and is mainly synthesized during cysteine metabolism and excreted as urinary sulfates by the kidney (reviewed in [47]). CBS catalyzes the production of H2S via at least three pathways including (i) converting cysteine to serine and H2S, (ii) condensing cysteine and Hcy to yield cystathionine and H2S, and (iii) condensing two cysteine molecules to lanthionine and H2S (Figure 1). In addition to CBS, CTH and 3-mercaptopyruvate sulfurtransferase (3-MST) are also involved in the conversion of cysteine to H2S (Figure 1).

While H2S has diverse biological functions in the nervous, cardiovascular, and immune systems, the pathological role of H2S in cancer biology has attracted substantial attention in recent years. CBS-driven endogenous H2S production has been reported to support tumor growth by (i) maintaining mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis, (ii) stimulating cell proliferation and survival, (iii) redox balance, and (iv) vasodilation (Figure 2). H2S modulates mitochondrial functions and cellular bioenergetics in a concentration-dependent manner. At low concentrations, H2S acts as a mitochondrial electron donor to mitochondrial complex II, resulting in bioenergetic stimulation [48, 49]. At higher concentrations, H2S acts as a mitochondrial poison via the inhibition of cytochrome c oxidase in mitochondrial complex IV [50]. H2S stimulates cell proliferation through activation of specific kinase pathways (e.g., MAPK and PI3K/Akt) and inhibition of selective phosphatases such as PTEN and PTP1B [5153]. Modulation of protein activity by H2S either occurs via protein sulfhydration (reviewed in [54]) or intracellular formation of polysulfides by H2S followed by oxidative inactivation of proteins [55, 56]. The sulfhydration of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) by H2S has also been shown to inhibit apoptosis and may be of particular relevance to cancer cell survival [57]. The protective effect of H2S from oxidative stress has been extensively studied in endothelial cells and neurons [5862]. Studies showed H2S inhibited H2O2-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction by preserving the protein expression levels and activity of key antioxidant enzymes, inhibiting reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and lipid peroxidation [60]. Additionally, these effects may be associated with sulfhydration of Keap1 and activation of Nrf2 [61] or increasing the production of the antioxidant glutathione. Vasorelaxation is one of the first recognized biological effects of H2S. The mechanisms of H2S-mediated vasodilation include the activation of ATP-sensitive K+ channels, inhibition of phosphodiesterases, and a synergy with NO (reviewed in [63]).

H2S-donating compounds deliver H2S exogenously, including fast H2S donors such as sulfate salts (e.g., NaHS and Na2S) and naturally occurring compounds (e.g., the garlic constituent diallyl trisulfide, sulforaphane, erucin, and iberin) and slow H2S-releasing synthetic moieties such as GYY4137 (reviewed in [64]). The cellular response to exogenous H2S released by the donors has been considered as a biphasic response, in which low H2S concentrations (or low H2S production rates) showed enhancement of cell proliferation rates and cell viability whereas high H2S caused deleterious/adverse effects in cells [50, 65]. This biphasic cellular response is consistent with the special action model of H2S on mitochondrial respiration described above, that is, stimulation of mitochondrial respiration at low levels and inhibition at high levels. This bell-shape pharmacology of H2S may, at least in part, explain the inconsistent results of the effect of exogenous H2S in colon cancer cell line HCT116 reported by different groups including a growth inhibitory effect (using NaHS at 400 μM and 800 μM) by the Deng lab [66] and a growth stimulatory effect (using NaHS at 30-300 μM) by the Szabo lab [49, 65, 67].

4. CBS and Cancer

4.1. Promoting Tumor Growth by Activation of CBS

Elevated expression of CBS in tumor tissues or cell lines has been reported in colon [49, 68], ovarian [8], prostate [69], and breast cancer [70], compared to adjacent normal tissue or nontransformed cells. A series of studies from the Hellmich group characterized the oncogenic role of CBS in colon cancer [49, 68, 71]. Through modification of CBS expression (overexpression or RNAi knockdown) or CBS activity (allosteric activator SAM or the inhibitor aminooxyacetate) in the HCT116 colon cancer cell line, they demonstrated that CBS promoted cancer cell proliferation. The antiproliferative effect observed by silencing or inhibiting CBS was recapitulated in the xenograft mouse models and patient-derived tumor xenografts [49]. CBS not only promotes tumor growth and progression but also initiates tumor formation [68]. Overexpression of CBS in adenoma-like colonic epithelial cell line NCM356 enhanced cell proliferative, anchorage-independent growth and invasive capability in vitro and tumorigenicity in vivo. Mice heterozygous for CBS showed fewer numbers of mutagen-induced aberrant crypt foci than wild-type controls. Through a similar approach, Bhattacharyya et al. [8] reported that CBS knockdown inhibited cell proliferation and suppressed tumor growth in an orthotopic mouse model of cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer. Interestingly, in breast cancer silencing CBS did not affect cell proliferation in culture but significantly attenuated tumor growth in a xenograft mouse model [70].

The protumorigenic effect of CBS occurs through an autocrine mechanism by regulation of bioenergetics, antioxidant capacity, and apoptosis-related pathways. Targeting CBS genetically or pharmacologically impairs cellular bioenergetics through inhibiting mitochondrial electron transport, oxidative phosphorylation, and glycolysis. H2S was identified to be responsible for such metabolic and bioenergetic rewiring in colon cancer cells, as CBS expression and activity correlated with H2S production and exogenous H2S stimulated cell proliferation and bioenergetics [49]. Systematic metabolomic analysis of CBS-overexpressing NCM356 cells uncovered an anabolic metabolic phenotype with significantly enhanced glycolysis, nucleotide synthesis, and lipogenesis, which is thought to promote malignant transformation [68]. CBS may also promote tumor cell survival by increasing cell intrinsic antioxidant capacity. Ovarian cancer cells depleted of CBS showed enhanced ROS production. Antioxidant glutathione, but not H2S, fully rescued viability of CBS-depleted cells, suggesting that the effect of CBS in ovarian cancer cells is mediated through regulation of ROS production by glutathione [8]. Similarly, reduced glutathione abundance was observed in breast cancer cells upon CBS silencing and was accompanied by decreased Nrf2 expression [72]. CBS downregulation reduced antioxidant capacity and enhanced the sensitivity of cancer cells to chemotherapeutic drugs. The cytoprotective effect of CBS is also associated with regulation of NF-κB and p53 apoptosis-related signaling [8]. A recent study further suggested CBS is involved in nucleolar stress-induced apoptosis [10]. The authors demonstrated that treatment of p53-/- colon cancer cells with 5-fluorouracil caused nucleolar stress, which led to accumulation of the ribosome-free form of ribosomal protein L3 (rpL3). rpL3 decreased CBS protein abundance through suppression of SP1-mediated CBS gene transcription and increase of CBS protein degradation by translocation of CBS into mitochondria. Decreased CBS abundance and, in turn, reduction of H2S production have been suggested to contribute to mitochondrial cytochrome C release and induction of the intrinsic cell death pathway [10].

In addition to autocrine regulation, CBS acts via a paracrine mechanism to modulate the tumor microenvironment including stimulating angiogenesis and vasodilation via H2S production and release as reported in colon and ovarian cancer xenografts [8, 49] and regulating macrophage activation in breast cancer xenograft mouse models [70].

4.2. CBS Associated Oncogenesis Is Tumor Type-Specific

Unlike in colon, ovarian, and breast cancer, CBS does not appear to have a functional role in melanoma [73]. CBS expression is absent in dysplastic nevi, detected in only 25% of primary melanoma samples, and unregulated in four of five melanoma cell lines examined. More importantly, modulation of CBS expression had a minimal effect on melanoma cell proliferation [73].

Downregulation of CBS through promoter methylation has been observed in multiple gastric cancer cell lines and four colon cancer cell lines (including HCT116) [74]. However, the biological consequence of CBS epigenetic silencing in gastric cancer has not been determined. Evidence from glioma supports a tumor-suppressive role for CBS [75]. CBS deficiency in U87-MG glioma cells did not affect cell proliferation in 2D culture but increased colony formation in soft agar, indicative of enhanced anchorage-independent growth. Consistently, CBS knockdown decreased tumor latency in U87-MG xenografts and increased tumor volume in an orthotopic model. Enhanced glioma tumorigenicity upon CBS loss was associated with upregulation of HIF-2α protein level and HIF-2α-dependent transcriptional activation of angiopoietin like 4 (ANGPTL4) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA). The lack of function or suppression of tumor growth by CBS in certain tumor types indicates that CBS associated oncogenesis is tumor-specific (Figure 3).

4.3. Conflicting Role of CBS in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Clinical evidence from patient samples strongly supports a negative regulatory role for CBS in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Downregulation of CBS expression and activity contributes to the pathogenesis of multiple liver diseases (Reviewed in [76]). Analysis of 120 HCC specimens found that CBS mRNA was markedly lower in tumor tissues than surrounding noncancerous liver [77]. Reduced CBS expression was significantly correlated with the poor clinic pathological parameters including tumor stage, Edmondson grade, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level, and overall survival. Further data analysis suggested that the expression level of CBS mRNA could be used as a prognostic marker for overall survival especially in patients with low AFP levels [77]. Diminished CBS levels were also detected in the tumor tissues from the mouse model of HCC [7880]. Further supporting the tumor-suppressive role for CBS, exogenous H2S induced autophagy and apoptosis in HCC cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway [81].

Intriguingly, distinct from this clinical data, a recent study showed that several HCC cell lines exhibited higher CBS expression than normal liver cells HL-7702 and QSG-7701 [82]. Both genetic (by siRNA) and pharmacological (by AOAA) inhibition of CBS in the SMMC-7721 HCC cell line with reduced H2S production decreased cell viability and enhanced ROS production in vitro. Another study showing that the PI3K/AKT pathway regulated the CTH/H2S to promote HCC proliferation also supports the oncogenic role of H2S in HCC [53]. Clearly, the biological function of CBS in liver cancer is complex and requires further investigation.

5. CBS in Cancer Therapy

Consistent with the complex roles of CBS in cancer biology described above, it is also becoming evident that both the activators and inhibitors of CBS have antitumor activity in different cancer models. This genetic context dependence determines different types of cancer will display distinct efficacy and toxicity profiles in response to CBS-based targeted therapies.

5.1. CBS Inhibitors

Aminooxyacetate (AOAA) is currently considered as the most potent CBS inhibitor compared with the other drugs such as trifluoroalanine and hydroxylamine [65]. It has shown antitumor actions in the mouse xenograft models of colon [49] and breast cancer [83] and patient-derived colon cancer xenografts [49]. Decreased H2S level in plasma was detected in a colon xenograft mouse model treated with AOAA while the drug effect on circulating Hcy level was not investigated. While these antitumor responses are encouraging, the therapeutic effect of CBS inhibition requires further investigation as AOAA is actually not selective for CBS [65, 84]. The pharmacological action of AOAA is not limited to suppression of the CBS/ H2S axis. It binds irreversibly to the cofactor PLP, and therefore, in addition to CBS, it inhibits other PLP-dependent enzymes such as CTH, 3-MST, and glutamate oxaloacetate transaminase 1 (GOT1). AOAA has been reported to target CTH preferentially over CBS (IC50 8.52 μM for CBS versus 1.09 μM for CTH) [85]. Furthermore, inhibition of GOT1 by AOAA disrupted the malate/aspartate shuttle, decreased glucose-derived carbon flux into mitochondrial tricarboxylic acid cycle, and ATP synthesis [83].

To identify new CBS inhibitors, two groups performed small-molecule screening [86, 87]. The Barrios group [87] and the Wu group [86] used recombinant CBS enzymes and employed fluorescent H2S readouts to screen a composite library of 1900 compounds and a chemical library consisting of 20,000 compounds, respectively. Several compounds showed some selectivity for CBS compared with CTH with IC50 20-50 μM. However, as the studies did not use AOAA as a reference in the screen, whether these drugs are superior to AOAA in terms of potency and selectivity remains unknown.

5.2. CBS Activator S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine (SAM)

SAM is a vital molecule for transmethylation and transsulfuration reactions. It is the principle methyl-donor for DNA, amino acid, protein, and lipid methyltransferase and a key precursor for glutathione and polyamine synthesis (reviewed by [88]). It is synthesized from methionine and ATP by methionine adenosyltransferase (MAT, Figure 1). SAM, as an allosteric activator, modulates CBS activity by inducing a conformational change in the C-terminus of CBS that facilitates the entrance of substrates into the catalytic site of the enzyme [1]. Although SAM has been used for treatment of osteoarthritis [89], depression [90], and liver diseases [88], the clinical evidence for its efficacy in these diseases is still inconclusive. Recent data support the concept of using SAM as a chemopreventive agent in HCC and colon cancer, consistent with the proposed tumor-suppressive role of CBS in HCC. The Mat1a knockout mice spontaneously develop HCC supporting the fact that hepatic SAM deficiency predisposes to HCC [91]. In several rodent models of HCC, administration of SAM is effective in preventing liver carcinogenesis [92, 93]. One phase II clinical trial is evaluating SAM as a potential chemoprevention agent in patients with hepatitis C cirrhosis [94]. SAM also showed a similar chemoprevention effect in an inflammation induced colon cancer mouse model [95]. In addition to chemoprevention, SAM exerted a proapoptotic effect in liver (at 0.2 mM over 5 days) [96], gastric (10 μM over 7 days) [97], and colon cancer cells (ranging from 0.25 to 5 mM for 24 hours) [98]. Interestingly, similar to the conflicting data regarding CBS function and effects of H2S donors in colon cancer, the Szabo group [71] reported a biphasic response to SAM in colon cancer cells. At low concentrations for the short-time period (0.1-1 mM for 12 hours or 0.1 mM for 24 hours), SAM induced a stimulatory effect on CBS activation, H2S production, and cell proliferation, while at higher concentrations or chronic exposure (0.1-5 mM after 24 hours) the inhibitory effects became more prominent and were not attenuated by CBS silencing, suggesting nonspecificity or toxicity [71]. Therefore, more work in multiple experiment models is required to better define the role of SAM/CBS axis in cancer pathogenesis.

6. CBS in Cancer Prognosis

With the identification of the pathogenic role of CBS in cancer, the use of CBS as a prognostic and predictive biomarker is becoming attractive. As described above, the negative correlation of CBS expression with the pathologic parameters in HCC indicates its potential as a prognostic marker in HCC [77]. Modulation of CBS activity can be indicated by the changes of Hcy and/or H2S levels. The potential prognostic values of Hcy in cancer have been extensively studied [99101]. However, the biological sources of Hcy were not defined in these studies and, thus, the link between the levels of Hcy and CBS function remains unknown. Nevertheless, significant progress in the detection and quantitation of Hcy from patient samples has been made in recent years. Methods of measuring plasma Hcy have evolved from ion-exchange chromatography to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), gas-chromatography mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) [102]. In terms of H2S, elevated H2S in exhaled breath or its degraded form in urine in cancer patients provides support for the clinical utility of H2S as a marker of cancer [101]. However, in order to determine the prognostic and predictive values of H2S in cancer, development of the methods that can accurately measure H2S levels in the circulation or in the targeted organs is imperative.

7. Summary and Future Directions

A functional role for CBS in tumor biology is supported by (i) clinical evidence of altered CBS expression level and CBS-derived Hcy and H2S levels in cancer patients; (ii) preclinical studies showing dysregulation of CBS function and activity in cancer cell culture and animal models; (iii) mechanistic investigations linking CBS to cancer-related cellular and molecular changes and signaling pathways. The distinct biological effects of CBS alterations in different cancer models reveal the complexity of CBS signaling in cancer pathogenesis. The contradictory role of CBS in cancer biology (Figure 3) is possibly due to the existence of alternative Hcy and H2S metabolic pathways, and multiple modes of regulation of CBS expression and activity by hormones, growth factors, and other metabolites. Therefore, the functional role of CBS is determined by the distinct metabolic and genetic profiles in different types of cancer and is context-dependent. Furthermore, the current conflicting data adds an additional layer of complexity, indicating that multiple experimental and analytical approaches as well as in-depth mechanistic investigations are required to clarify the role of CBS in cancer biology.

Increased understanding of the role of the CBS-controlled network in cancer biology will greatly promote the development of pharmacological reagents targeting CBS and the identification of appropriate patient populations. CBS acts through two main metabolites Hcy and H2S, which have important physiological roles in specific tissues such as the liver, brain, and blood vessels. Given its central metabolic role, it is possible that CBS-based targeted therapy may cause side effects due to accumulation of unfavorable metabolites. For example, CBS inhibitors may elevate Hcy levels with potential risk for developing HHcy. Therefore, further studies will be required to define the therapeutic windows of the novel CBS targeting agents. Additional investigations are clearly required to better elucidate the complex role of CBS in malignant transformation including (i) characterizing the role of CBS-related metabolic signaling in cancer pathogenesis including but not limited to CBS, Hcy, H2S, and the related enzymes; (ii) determining the interaction of tumor cell-derived CBS and its metabolites with the microenvironment; (iii) identifying biomarkers of CBS-based therapies in clinical samples and cancer models. Certainly, a greater appreciation for the complexity of CBS in cancer biology will give rise to new prospective biomarkers or targets for cancer.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Authors’ Contributions

Richard B. Pearson and Jian Kang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors apologize to the authors of many primary research papers that were not cited here due to space constraints but whose work influenced their understanding substantially. This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia project and program grants and Cancer Council Victoria. Researchers were funded by NHMRC Fellowships (Richard B. Pearson), a Melbourne International Research Scholarship (Haoran Zhu), and Research Training Program Scholarship (the University of Melbourne) (Shaun Blake).

References

  1. J. Ereño-Orbea, T. Majtan, I. Oyenarte, J. P. Kraus, and L. A. Martínez-Cruza, “Structural basis of regulation and oligomerization of human cystathionine β-synthase, the central enzyme of transsulfuration,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 40, pp. E3790–E3799, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. Ereno-Orbea, T. Majtan, I. Oyenarte, J. P. Kraus, and L. A. Martinez-Cruz, “Structural insight into the molecular mechanism of allosteric activation of human cystathionine β-synthase by S-adenosylmethionine,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 111, no. 37, pp. E3845–E3852, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. T. Majtan, L. R. Singh, L. Wang, W. D. Kruger, and J. P. Kraus, “Active cystathionine β-synthase can be expressed in heme-free systems in the presence of metal-substituted porphyrins or a chemical chaperone,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 50, pp. 34588–34595, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. M. Meier, M. Janosik, V. Kery, J. P. Kraus, and P. Burkhard, “Structure of human cystathionine β-synthase: a unique pyridoxal 5-phosphate-dependent heme protein,” EMBO Journal, vol. 20, no. 15, pp. 3910–3916, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. V. Kery, L. Poneleit, and J. P. Kraus, “Trypsin cleavage of human cystathionine β-synthase into an evolutionarily conserved active core: Structural and functional consequences,” Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 355, no. 2, pp. 222–232, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K.-H. Jhee, P. McPhie, and E. W. Miles, “Domain architecture of the heme-independent yeast cystathionine β-synthase provides insights into mechanisms of catalysis and regulation,” Biochemistry, vol. 39, no. 34, pp. 10548–10556, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. O. Kabil, Y. Zhou, and R. Banerjee, “Human cystathionine β-synthase is a target for sumoylation,” Biochemistry, vol. 45, no. 45, pp. 13528–13536, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. S. Bhattacharyya, S. Saha, K. Giri et al., “Cystathionine Beta-Synthase (CBS) Contributes to Advanced Ovarian Cancer Progression and Drug Resistance,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 11, Article ID e79167, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. Teng, B. Wu, K. Zhao, G. Yang, L. Wu, and R. Wang, “Oxygen-sensitive mitochondrial accumulation of cystathionine β-synthase mediated by Lon protease,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 31, pp. 12679–12684, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. V. Pagliara, A. Saide, E. Mitidieri et al., “5-FU targets rpL3 to induce mitochondrial apoptosis via cystathionine-β-synthase in colon cancer cells lacking p53,” Oncotarget , vol. 7, no. 31, pp. 50333–50348, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  11. S. Ratnam, K. N. Maclean, R. L. Jacobs, M. E. Brosnan, J. P. Kraus, and J. T. Brosnan, “Hormonal regulation of cystathionine β-synthase expression in liver,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 45, pp. 42912–42918, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. V. Vitvitsky, A. Prudova, S. Stabler, S. Dayal, S. R. Lentz, and R. Banerjee, “Testosterone regulation of renal cystathionine β-synthase: Implications for sex-dependent differences in plasma homocysteine levels,” American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology, vol. 293, no. 2, pp. F594–F600, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Enokido, E. Suzuki, K. Iwasawa, K. Namekata, H. Okazawa, and H. Kimura, “Cystathionine β-synthase, a key enzyme for homocysteine metabolism, is preferentially expressed in the radial glia/astrocyte lineage of developing mouse CNS,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 19, no. 13, pp. 1854–1856, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. N. Takano, Y.-J. Peng, G. K. Kumar et al., “Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate human and rat cystathionine beta-synthase gene expression,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 458, no. 2, pp. 203–211, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. K. N. Maclean, E. Kraus, and J. P. Kraus, “The Dominant Role of Sp1 in Regulating the Cystathionine β-Synthase -1a and -1b Promoters Facilitates Potential Tissue-specific Regulation by Kruppel-like Factors,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 10, pp. 8558–8566, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. Y. Ge, M. A. Konrad, L. H. Matherly, and J. W. Taub, “Transcriptional regulation of the human cystathionine β-synthase - 1b basal promoter: Synergistic transactivation by transcription factors NF-Y and Sp1/Sp3,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 357, no. 1, pp. 97–105, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. W.-N. Niu, P. K. Yadav, J. Adamec, and R. Banerjee, “S-glutathionylation enhances human cystathionine β-synthase activity under oxidative stress conditions,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 350–361, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Qi, Y. Zhou, Y. Xiao et al., “Promoter demethylation of cystathionine-β-synthetase gene contributes to inflammatory pain in rats,” PAIN, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 34–45, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. H.-H. Zhang, J. Hu, Y.-L. Zhou et al., “Promoted interaction of nuclear factor-κB with demethylated cystathionine-β-synthetase gene contributes to gastric hypersensitivity in diabetic rats,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 33, no. 21, pp. 9028–9038, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. W. D. Kruger, L. Wang, K. H. Jhee, R. H. Singh, and L. J. Elsas II, “Cystathionine β-Synthase Deficiency in Georgia (USA): Correlation of Clinical and Biochemical Phenotype with Genotype,” Human Mutation, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 434–441, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Meier, J. Oliveriusova, J. P. Kraus, and P. Burkhard, “Structural insights into mutations of cystathionine β-synthase,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics, vol. 1647, no. 1-2, pp. 206–213, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. Yamanishi, O. Kabil, S. Sen, and R. Banerjee, “Structural insights into pathogenic mutations in heme-dependent cystathionine-β-synthase,” Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry, vol. 100, no. 12, pp. 1988–1995, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. A. A. M. Morris, V. Kozich, S. Santra et al., “Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of cystathionine beta-synthase deficiency,” Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 49–74, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. V. E. Shih, J. M. Fringer, R. Mandell et al., “A missense mutation (I278T) in the cystathionine β-synthase gene prevalent in pyridoxine-responsive homocystinuria and associated with mild clinical phenotype,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 34–39, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  25. E. W. Miles and J. P. Kraus, “Cystathionine β-synthase: Structure, function, regulation, and location of homocystinuria-causing mutations,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 29, pp. 29871–29874, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. W. D. Kruger, “Cystathionine β-synthase deficiency: Of mice and men,” Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 199–205, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. Watanabe, J. Osada, Y. Aratani et al., “Mice deficient in cystathionine β-synthase: animal models for mild and severe homocyst(e)inemia,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1585–1589, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Wang, K.-H. Jhee, X. Hua, P. M. DiBello, D. W. Jacobsen, and W. D. Kruger, “Modulation of cystathionine β-synthase level regulates total serum homocysteine in mice,” Circulation Research, vol. 94, no. 10, pp. 1318–1324, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Gupta, J. Kühnisch, A. Mustafa et al., “Mouse models of cystathionine β-synthase deficiency reveal significant threshold effects of hyperhomocysteinemia,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 883–893, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. N. Tyagi, N. Qipshidze, U. Sen, W. Rodriguez, A. Ovechkin, and S. C. Tyagi, “Cystathionine beta synthase gene dose dependent vascular remodeling in murine model of hyperhomocysteinemia,” International Journal of Physiology, Pathophysiology and Pharmacology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 210–222, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  31. K. Robert, J. Nehmé, E. Bourdon et al., “Cystathionine β synthase deficiency promotes oxidative stress, fibrosis, and steatosis in mice liver,” Gastroenterology, vol. 128, no. 5, pp. 1405–1415, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. L. M. Graham, L. E. Daly, H. M. Refsum et al., “Plasma homocysteine as a risk factor for vascular disease: The European Concerted Action Project,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 277, no. 22, pp. 1775–1781, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Brustolin, R. Giugliani, and T. M. Félix, “Genetics of homocysteine metabolism and associated disorders,” Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Jakubowski, “Proofreading in vivo: Editing of homocysteine by methionyl-tRNA synthetase in Escherichia coli,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 4504–4508, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. W. K. C. Lai and M. Y. Kan, “Homocysteine-induced endothelial dysfunction,” Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism, vol. 67, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. X. C. Wang, W. T. Sun, C. M. Yu et al., “ER stress mediates homocysteine-induced endothelial dysfunction: modulation of IKCa and SKCa channels,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 242, no. 1, pp. 191–198, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Zhou, Z. Zhang, and G. Xu, “Notable epigenetic role of hyperhomocysteinemia in atherogenesis,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 13, no. 1, article no. 134, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. S. Jamaluddin, I. Chen, F. Yang et al., “Homocysteine inhibits endothelial cell growth via DNA hypomethylation of the cyclin A gene,” Blood, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 3648–3655, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P.-Y. Chang, S.-C. Lu, C.-M. Lee et al., “Homocysteine inhibits arterial endothelial cell growth through transcriptional downregulation of fibroblast growth factor-2 involving G protein and DNA methylation,” Circulation Research, vol. 102, no. 8, pp. 933–941, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. D. Zhang, X. Sun, J. Liu, X. Xie, W. Cui, and Y. Zhu, “Homocysteine accelerates senescence of endothelial cells via DNA hypomethylation of human telomerase reverse transcriptase,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 71–78, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. C.-S. Kim, Y.-R. Kim, A. Naqvi et al., “Homocysteine promotes human endothelial cell dysfunction via site-specific epigenetic regulation of p66shc,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 466–475, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C.-F. Sun, T. R. Haven, T.-L. Wu, K.-C. Tsao, and J. T. Wu, “Serum total homocysteine increases with the rapid proliferation rate of tumor cells and decline upon cell death: A potential new tumor marker,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 321, no. 1-2, pp. 55–62, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. P. Cavuoto and M. F. Fenech, “A review of methionine dependency and the role of methionine restriction in cancer growth control and life-span extension,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 726–736, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. D. Zhang, X. Wen, W. Wu, Y. Guo, and W. Cui, “Elevated homocysteine level and folate deficiency associated with increased overall risk of carcinogenesis: Meta-analysis of 83 case-control studies involving 35,758 individuals,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 5, Article ID e0123423, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. Almadori, F. Bussu, J. Galli et al., “Serum folate and homocysteine levels in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 1006–1011, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. Zhang, J. Lou, X. Zhang et al., “Hyperhomocysteinemia results from and promotes hepatocellular carcinoma via CYP450 metabolism by CYP2J2 DNA methylation,” Oncotarget , vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 15377–15392, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Szabo, “Gasotransmitters in cancer: From pathophysiology to experimental therapy,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 185–203, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. E. Lagoutte, S. Mimoun, M. Andriamihaja, C. Chaumontet, F. Blachier, and F. Bouillaud, “Oxidation of hydrogen sulfide remains a priority in mammalian cells and causes reverse electron transfer in colonocytes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics, vol. 1797, no. 8, pp. 1500–1511, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. C. Szabo, C. Coletta, C. Chao et al., “Tumor-derived hydrogen sulfide, produced by cystathionine-β-synthase, stimulates bioenergetics, cell proliferation, and angiogenesis in colon cancer,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 30, pp. 12474–12479, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. C. Szabo, C. Ransy, K. Módis et al., “Regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetic function by hydrogen sulfide. Part I. Biochemical and physiological mechanisms,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 171, no. 8, pp. 2099–2122, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. W.-J. Cai, M.-J. Wang, P. K. Moore, H.-M. Jin, T. Yao, and Y.-C. Zhu, “The novel proangiogenic effect of hydrogen sulfide is dependent on Akt phosphorylation,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 29–40, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. P. Manna and S. K. Jain, “Hydrogen sulfide and L-cysteine increase phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate (PIP3) and glucose utilization by inhibiting phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) protein and activating phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/serine/threonine protein kinase (AKT)/protein kinase Czeta/lambda (PKCzeta/lambda) in 3T3l1 adipocytes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 286, no. 46, pp. 39848–39859, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. P. Yin, C. Zhao, Z. Li et al., “Sp1 is involved in regulation of cystathionine γ-lyase gene expression and biological function by PI3K/Akt pathway in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1229–1240, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. B. D. Paul and S. H. Snyder, “H 2S signalling through protein sulfhydration and beyond,” Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 499–507, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. R. Greiner, Z. Pálinkás, K. Bäsell et al., “Polysulfides link H2S to protein thiol oxidation,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 19, no. 15, pp. 1749–1765, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. Y. Kimura, Y. Mikami, K. Osumi, M. Tsugane, J.-I. Oka, and H. Kimura, “Polysulfides are possible H2S-derived signaling molecules in rat brain,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2451–2457, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. N. Sen, B. D. Paul, M. M. Gadalla et al., “Hydrogen sulfide-linked sulfhydration of NF-κB mediates its antiapoptotic actions,” Molecular Cell, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 13–24, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. P. B. L. Pun, J. Lu, E. M. Kan, and S. Moochhala, “Gases in the mitochondria,” Mitochondrion, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 83–93, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. Suzuki, G. Olah, K. Modis et al., “Hydrogen sulfide replacement therapy protects the vascular endothelium in hyperglycemia by preserving mitochondrial function,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 33, pp. 13829–13834, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. Y.-D. Wen, H. Wang, S.-H. Kho et al., “Hydrogen sulfide protects HUVECs against hydrogen peroxide induced mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 2, Article ID e53147, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. G. Yang, K. Zhao, and Y. Ju, “Hydrogen sulfide protects against cellular senescence via S-sulfhydration of keap1 and activation of Nrf2,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 18, no. 15, pp. 1906–1919, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. S. Koike, Y. Ogasawara, N. Shibuya, H. Kimura, and K. Ishii, “Polysulfide exerts a protective effect against cytotoxicity caused by t-buthylhydroperoxide through Nrf2 signaling in neuroblastoma cells,” FEBS Letters, vol. 587, no. 21, pp. 3548–3555, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. R. Wang, “Physiological implications of hydrogen sulfide: a whiff exploration that blossomed,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 92, no. 2, pp. 791–896, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. K. Kashfi and K. R. Olson, “Biology and therapeutic potential of hydrogen sulfide and hydrogen sulfide-releasing chimeras,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 689–703, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. M. R. Hellmich, C. Coletta, C. Chao, and C. Szabo, “The therapeutic potential of cystathionine β-synthetase/hydrogen sulfide inhibition in cancer,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 424–448, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. Z. W. Lee, J. Zhou, C.-S. Chen et al., “The slow-releasing Hydrogen Sulfide donor, GYY4137, exhibits novel anti-cancer effects in vitro and in vivo,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e21077, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. W.-J. Cai, M.-J. Wang, L.-H. Ju, C. Wang, and Y.-C. Zhu, “Hydrogen sulfide induces human colon cancer cell proliferation: Role of Akt, ERK and p21,” Cell Biology International, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 565–572, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. M. Phillips, J. R. Zatarain, M. E. Nicholls et al., “Upregulation of cystathionine-β-synthase in colonic epithelia reprograms metabolism and promotes carcinogenesis,” Cancer Research, vol. 77, no. 21, pp. 5741–5754, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. H. Guo, J.-W. Gai, Y. Wang, H.-F. Jin, J.-B. Du, and J. Jin, “Characterization of hydrogen sulfide and its synthases, cystathionine β-synthase and cystathionine γ-lyase, in human prostatic tissue and cells,” Urology, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 483.e1–483.e5, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. S. Sen, B. Kawahara, D. Gupta et al., “Role of cystathionine β-synthase in human breast Cancer,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 86, pp. 228–238, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. K. Módis, C. Coletta, A. Asimakopoulou et al., “Effect of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAM), an allosteric activator of cystathionine-β-synthase (CBS) on colorectal cancer cell proliferation and bioenergetics in vitro,” Nitric Oxide: Biology and Chemistry, vol. 41, pp. 146–156, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. B. Kawahara, T. Moller, K. Hu-Moore et al., “Attenuation of Antioxidant Capacity in Human Breast Cancer Cells by Carbon Monoxide through Inhibition of Cystathionine β-Synthase Activity: Implications in Chemotherapeutic Drug Sensitivity,” Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 60, no. 19, pp. 8000–8010, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. E. Panza, P. De Cicco, C. Armogida et al., “Role of the cystathionine γ lyase/hydrogen sulfide pathway in human melanoma progression,” Pigment Cell & Melanoma Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 61–72, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. H. Zhao, Q. Li, J. Wang et al., “Frequent epigenetic silencing of the folate-metabolising gene cystathionine-beta-synthase in gastrointestinal Cancer,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 11, Article ID e49683, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. N. Takano, Y. Sarfraz, D. M. Gilkes et al., “Decreased expression of cystathionine β-synthase promotes glioma tumorigenesis,” Molecular Cancer Research, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1398–1406, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. L. K. Sarna, Y. L. Siow, and O. Karmin, “The CBS/CSE system: A potential therapeutic target in NAFLD?” Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. J. Kim, S. J. Hong, J. H. Park et al., “Expression of cystathionine β-synthase is downregulated in hepatocellular carcinoma and associated with poor prognosis,” Oncology Reports, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 1449–1454, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. M. A. Avila, C. Berasain, L. Torres et al., “Reduced mRNA abundance of the main enzymes involved in methionine metabolism in human liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 907–914, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. Prudova, Z. Bauman, A. Braun, V. Vitvitsky, S. C. Lu, and R. Banerjee, “S-adenosylmethionine stabilizes cystathionine β-synthase and modulates redox capacity,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 17, pp. 6489–6494, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. D. F. Calvisi, M. M. Simile, S. Ladu et al., “Altered methionine metabolism and global DNA methylation in liver cancer: relationship with genomic instability and prognosis,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 2410–2420, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. S. S. Wang, Y. H. Chen, N. Chen et al., “Hydrogen sulfide promotes autophagy of hepatocellular carcinoma cells through the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway,” Cell Death & Disease, vol. 8, no. 3, Article ID e2688, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. H. Jia, J. Ye, J. You, X. Shi, W. Kang, and T. Wang, “Role of the cystathionine β-synthase/H2S system in liver cancer cells and the inhibitory effect of quinolone-indolone conjugate QIC2 on the system,” Oncology Reports, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 3001–3009, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. J. M. Thornburg, K. K. Nelson, B. F. Clem et al., “Targeting aspartate aminotransferase in breast cancer,” Breast Cancer Research, vol. 10, no. 5, article no. R84, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. K. Módis, E. M. Bos, E. Calzia et al., “Regulation of mitochondrial bioenergetic function by hydrogen sulfide. Part II. Pathophysiological and therapeutic aspects,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 171, no. 8, pp. 2123–2146, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. A. Asimakopoulou, P. Panopoulos, C. T. Chasapis et al., “Selectivity of commonly used pharmacological inhibitors for cystathionine β synthase (CBS) and cystathionine γ lyase (CSE),” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 922–932, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. Y. Zhou, J. Yu, X. Lei et al., “High-throughput tandem-microwell assay identifies inhibitors of the hydrogen sulfide signaling pathway,” Chemical Communications, vol. 49, no. 100, pp. 11782–11784, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. M. K. Thorson, T. Majtan, J. P. Kraus, and A. M. Barrios, “Identification of Cystathionine β-Synthase Inhibitors Using a Hydrogen Sulfide Selective Probe,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 52, no. 17, pp. 4641–4644, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. S. C. Lu and J. M. Mato, “S-adenosylmethionine in liver health, injury, and cancer,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 1515–1542, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. A. W. Rutjes, E. Nüesch, S. Reichenbach, and P. Jüni, “S-Adenosylmethionine for osteoarthritis of the knee or hip.,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (Online), no. 4, p. CD007321, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  90. I. Galizia, L. Oldani, K. Macritchie et al., “S-adenosyl methionine (SAMe) for depression in adults,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 2016, no. 10, Article ID CD011286, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. M. L. Martínez-Chantar, F. J. Corrales, L. A. Martínez-Cruz et al., “Spontaneous oxidative stress and liver tumors in mice lacking methionine adenosyltransferase 1A,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1292–1294, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. R. M. Pascale, M. M. Simile, M. R. D. Miglio et al., “Chemoprevention by s-adenosyl-l-methionine of rat liver carcinogenesis initiated by 1,2-dimethylhydrazine and promoted by orotic acid,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 427–430, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. S. C. Lu, K. Ramani, X. Ou et al., “S-adenosylmethionine in the chemoprevention and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in a rat model,” Hepatology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 462–471, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. T. R. Morgan, “Chemoprevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C,” Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol. 188, pp. 85–99, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. T. W. H. Li, H. Yang, H. Peng, M. Xia, J. M. Mato, and S. C. Lu, “Effects of S-adenosylmethionine and methylthioadenosine on inflammation-induced colon cancer in mice,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 427–435, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. Y. Wang, Z. Sun, and M. Szyf, “S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM) alters the transcriptome and methylome and specifically blocks growth and invasiveness of liver cancer cells,” Oncotarget , vol. 8, no. 67, pp. 111866–111881, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  97. J. Luo, Y.-N. Li, F. Wang, W.-M. Zhang, and X. Geng, “S-adenosylmethionine inhibits the growth of cancer cells by reversing the hypomethylation status of c-myc and H-ras in human gastric cancer and colon cancer,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 784–795, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  98. T. W. H. Li, Q. Zhang, P. Oh et al., “S-adenosylmethionine and methylthioadenosine inhibit cellular FLICE inhibitory protein expression and induce apoptosis in colon cancer cells,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 192–200, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. L. L. Wu and J. T. Wu, “Hyperhomocysteinemia is a risk factor for cancer and a new potential tumor marker,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 322, no. 1-2, pp. 21–28, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. Y. Özkan, S. Yardim-Akaydin, H. Firat, E. Çalişkan-Can, S. Ardiç, and B. Şimşek, “Usefulness of homocysteine as a cancer marker: Total thiol compounds and folate levels in untreated lung cancer patients,” Anticancer Reseach, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1185–1189, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  101. M. R. Hellmich and C. Szabo, “Hydrogen sulfide and cancer,” Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 230, pp. 233–241, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. H. J. Powers and S. J. Moat, “Developments in the measurement of plasma total homocysteine,” Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition & Metabolic Care, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 391–397, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Haoran Zhu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

2084 Views | 619 Downloads | 10 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.