Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
BioMed Research International
Volume 2018, Article ID 3820215, 8 pages
Review Article

Actinomyces and Alimentary Tract Diseases: A Review of Its Biological Functions and Pathology

1Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of PLA, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China
2Department of Oncology, General Hospital of PLA, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China
3Department of Nanlou Clinical Laboratory, General Hospital of PLA, No. 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China

Correspondence should be addressed to Benyan Wu; moc.anis.piv@uwnayneb and Jun Wan; moc.621@103nujnaw

Received 9 May 2018; Accepted 2 July 2018; Published 26 August 2018

Academic Editor: Takashi Saku

Copyright © 2018 Jun Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Actinomyces are nonmotile, filamentous, Gram-positive bacteria that cause actinomycosis in immunodeficiency patients. Although the prognosis of actinomycosis is good, the diagnosis of actinomycosis is quite difficult. Recent studies on actinomycosis have shown that Actinomyces play an important role in various biological and clinical processes, such as the formation of dental plaque and the degradation of organics in the gastrointestinal tract. Here, the distribution of Actinomyces in the digestive tract, and different biological effects of actinomycosis, and its clinical association with inflammatory diseases are discussed. Furthermore, an overview of the most commonly used treatment methods and drugs used to treat Actinomyces infected alimentary canal diseases is presented.

1. Introduction

Actinomyces species (A.) are nonmotile, filamentous, Gram-positive, and obligate anaerobic bacteria, which are facultatively pathogenic commensal inhabitants of the oral cavity, pharynx, gut, genitourinary tract, and skin [1]. Actinomyces also readily cause actinomycosis in immunodeficiency patients, which is an indolent progressing granulomatous disease [2]. Actinomycosis can affect all tissues and organs, categorized as cervicofacial, thoracic, abdominopelvic and other types of actinomycosis [3] (Figure 1). Although the prognosis of these infections normally is good with medical and surgical treatments, actinomycosis still can lead to the death of patients due to the difficulties of early diagnosis and the severe infection diffusion of Actinomyces [4].

Figure 1: Natural habitats and infection sites of Actinomyces species.

The mechanisms of pathogenicity of Actinomyces are not completely understood, but the invasion of breached or necrotic tissue has been proposed to be the initiating event for Actinomyces to penetrate and proliferate in deeper body structures [5]. Some studies have paid attention to Actinomyces related systemic infections including central nervous system (CNS) and cardiovascular and digestive tract diseases [69]. In the present review, we provide a brief review of (1) the distribution of Actinomyces species in the alimentary canal, (2) the biological function of Actinomyces species, (3) actinomycosis diseases in the digestive tract with diagnosis and treatment, and (4) possible correlations between the Actinomyces species and other inflammatory diseases of the alimentary tract.

2. Overview of Actinomyces Species and Actinomycosis

Actinomyces species, belonging to the phylum Actinobacteria, order Actinomycetales, and family Actinomycetaceae, are ubiquitous, occurring in soil and in the animal and human microbiota. Although currently a total of 47 Actinomyces species have been identified, among which 25 are found in the human microbiota [10], advanced molecular techniques have been applied for taxonomic reassessment [11, 12] and revealed novel Actinomyces genera [13, 14]. The Actinomyces phylum includes the pathogens Corynebacterium, Propionibacterium, Mycobacterium, and Nocardia. In addition, Propionibacterium propionicum and Bifidobacterium dentium have been documented as important pathogens involved in infections with similar symptoms to actinomycosis [15, 16]. However, A. gerencseriae and A. israelii are the most commonly reported species found in human forms of the disease, which are responsible for about 70% of orocervicofacial infections [5], whereas A. israelii, A. meyeri, and A. odontolyticus are mainly associated with the rare hematogenous dissemination of actinomycosis [17]. It is noteworthy that most Actinomyces species are found colonizing polymicrobial flora. Human actinomycosis lesions usually consist of other aerobic and/or anaerobic species including A. actinomycetemcomitans, Eikenella corrodens, Capnocytophaga, Fusobacteria, Bacteroides, Staphylococci, Streptococci, and Enterobacteriaceae [15, 18]. Therefore, the isolation and subsequent identification of the infecting bacteria by culture and pathology are crucial for the diagnosis of actinomycosis and the choice of adjunctive antibiotics due to its polymicrobial nature.

Actinomyces species are the causative agents for actinomycosis, which is a rare invasive bacterial disease and usually characterized by the formation of granulomatous tissue, necrosis and major reactive fibrosis, draining sinuses, abscesses, and the development of fistulas as the infection progresses [19]. Multiple different clinical features of actinomycosis at various anatomical sites have been described, which cervicofacial actinomycosis being the most commonly reported form, accounting for about 50% of all cases [20], followed by abdominal actinomycosis (20%) and thoracic actinomycosis (15-20%) [21]. Involvement of the CNS, bone, and skin are rare conditions, most likely occurring as a result of hematogenous spread or direct dissemination of the original infected lesions [22, 23]. It is widely assumed that the decline in the incidence of all forms of actinomycosis in recent years is due to improved oral hygiene and the organism’s susceptibility to many antimicrobial drugs used for bacteria diseases. However, actinomycosis is still widely distributed worldwide and affects mostly middle-aged individuals, especially males [19, 24].

3. Actinomyces Species as an Important Member of the Microbiome in the Human Alimentary Tract

It should be noted that the bacterial microbiome in the human alimentary tract is associated with both health and disease. Bacteria contribute to the development of mucosal barrier functions and suppress the establishment of pathogens [25], but can also be a chronic inflammatory stimulus to adjacent tissues [26, 27]. As a type of human commensal flora that normally colonizes the oral mucosa and nasopharyngeal, gastrointestinal tract and urogenital tracts, Actinomyces species play an important role in human health [28]. Before the further analysis of diseases caused by Actinomyces, it is perhaps useful to discuss the microbiome of Actinomyces in different locations of the alimentary tract.

The Human Microbiome Project Consortium investigated the dominant bacteria present in the oral cavity including Streptococcus, Haemophilus, Actinomyces, and Prevotella [29]. Various Actinomyces species have been shown to emerge in the oral cavity in one-third of infants at the age of 2 months and the diversity of Actinomyces increases with age [30]. A recent human oral microbiome study showed that the main members of the human oral microbiota included A. odontolyticus, A. gerencseriae, A. israelii, A. meyeri, A. naeslundii, A. oricola, A. radicidentis, and others not yet identified [31]. A. odontolyticus has been shown to be one of the most prevalent Actinomyces species and participates in the formation of the biofilm on teeth at all ages [32]. The involvement of Actinomyces species in the early stage of biofilm formation on teeth include A. naeslundii, A. oris, and A. gerencseriae [33]. However, not only in the oral cavity, species such as A. odontolyticus, A. meyeri, and A. graevenitzii were recently isolated as part of a stable environment with other bacteria in the distal esophagus [34] and A. israelii, A. meyeri, and A. turicensis were detected in the abdomen [35]. It is remarkable that Actinomyces species were detected as colonizers of the infant gastrointestinal tract by measuring the diversity of 16S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) in infant fecal samples using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methodology [36].

The proportion of some Actinomyces species such as A. odontolyticus and A. oris differs between healthy individuals and patients with periodontitis [37], and some Actinomyces species including A. turicensis, A. odontolyticus, A. israelii, and A. radingae were isolated from the tongue surface and may be involved in producing oral malodor [38]. In addition, a recent study characterized the composition and diversity of Actinomyces species in tonsillar crypts and found that A. odontolyticus colonized both healthy subjects and tonsillitis patients suggesting that other oral Actinomyces species found in tonsillar crypts microbiota such as A. georgiae, A. israelii, A. gerencseriae, A. meyeri, A. naeslundii, and A. radicidentis may be involved in causing the disease [39]. For various types of actinomycosis in the alimentary tract, the major Actinomyces species leading to abdominal actinomycosis include A. israelii and A. meyeri. Actinomycosis involvement of the liver and biliary tract is rare but have been described [35]. In addition to A. israelii and A. meyeri, other Actinomyces species such as A. funkei, A. odontolyticus, and A. turicensis have been implicated in liver actinomycosis [4042].

4. Biological Functions of Actinomyces Species

As one of the normal bacteria colonizing the digestive tract, Actinomyces species are not able to release exotoxins and their cellular components are not known to be toxic [43]. Formate, acetate, succinate, lactate, and various antibiotics are produced by the Actinomyces species, and the metabolic potential for Actinomyces might be to break down and recycle organic compounds in the human gastrointestinal system [28]. The specific pathogenesis of actinomycosis has still not been fully elucidated, but this type of infection is accompanied by long-term inflammatory lesions containing massive numbers of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs), macrophages, and plasma cells which are able to damage tissues by releasing hydrolytic enzymes [44].

Engel et al. suggested that the A. viscosus might release a chemotactic factor that is mainly responsible for the accumulation of PMNs and mononuclear cells; Actinomyces substances may have a direct effect upon monocytes once they arrive at the infected sites. Nevertheless, plasma cells may arise as a result of stimulation of B lymphocytes by specific A. viscosus antigens [45]. However, usually the Actinomyces species would not produce infections alone and actinomycosis often involves companion bacteria such as Gram-negative bacilli and anaerobic Streptococci. Jordan et al. established experimental actinomycotic infections in mice and the histological evidence showed that polymorphonuclear leukocytes were not able to penetrate and invade the developing central bacterial granule of A. israelii lesions, which resulted in the “unreachable attack” of the leukocytes towards the bacteria inside the granule, while the existence of the inside bacteria would enhance the viability of Actinomyces cells by producing an anaerobic environment. Thus, the companion bacteria would be able to elaborate the toxins and enzymes as well as inhibiting host defenses to facilitate infections [46].

Certain Actinomyces species in the oral cavity are developing the formation of a biofilm. Actinomyces oris is the predominant organism among many Actinomyces species known to colonize the human oral cavity in all age groups [47, 48]. It is able to express fimbriae to adherence saliva deposits on enamel and interbacterial associations [49, 50]. It is noteworthy that studies on the metabolism of Actinomyces species have revealed that the production of energy by most Actinomyces species is by glycolysis. This is true for healthy and carious root sites but different enzymes are involved [51], which indicated that the genus’ prevalence may be related to sugar availability and that altered metabolism of carbohydrates in the Actinomyces species is able to cause dysbiosis in the biofilm. In addition, the organic acid produced by the metabolism of Actinomyces would lead to the accumulation of intracellular polysaccharides, representing a cariogenic trait in these bacteria [52]. A recent study pointed out that A. naeslundii can utilize urea as a nitrogen source to protect itself from environmental acidification inside the oral cavity and then would be a kind of superior bacteria against the nonureolytic organisms in dental plaque, acting as a determinant of plaque ecology [53, 54].

5. Actinomycosis in the Alimentary Tract after Diagnosis and Treatment

As analyzed previously, Actinomycosis happening in alimentary tract is quite rare, and from the studies of case reports presented in recent years it is not surprising to find that most of the patients were middle-aged or above with hypoimmunity. These kinds of diseases are usually combined with other infections, malignant tumors, and damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa [5560].

More examples of actinomycosis in the alimentary tract accompanied with other diseases are presented. Lee et al. reported a 41-year-old man with a late stage HIV infection [59]. Meanwhile, a 30-year-old man with a previous endodontic treatment history contracted periapical actinomycosis [61], and a 27-yar-old male who had a history of renal transplantation for renal disease secondary to lupus was diagnosed with esophageal actinomycosis [62]. Also, Al-Obaidy et al. reported a case about primary gastric actinomycosis. Although the patient (87 years old) did not have a history of trauma or underwent abdominal surgery, the patient was prescribed medication over a long period for dyslipidemia, renal impairment, premature ventricular contractions, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and hypertension. The author suggested that the drugs the patient took would have caused damage to the gastric mucosa and that age-related mucosal atrophy was able to induce diminished mucosal resistance [58]. Therefore, actinomycosis frequently occurs in immunodeficient or immunocompromised patients due to other infections or the prescribed medication.

The colon, cecum, and appendix are the gastrointestinal tract regions commonly associated with actinomycosis [29]. Actinomyces species infection can proceed over many weeks or even years after destruction of the gastrointestinal mucosa. Previous surgical procedures for colonic diverticulitis with perforation or appendicitis are recognized predisposing factors [63]. Peitsidis et al. reported a 35-year-old woman who was diagnosed with appendix actinomycosis. This young woman had a long-standing intrauterine device, which can be a risk factor for infectious diseases [64].

Although the prognosis of infectious disease is generally good, there was still one case of actinomycosis in the mediastinum leading to the death of the patient. In this case, the infection spreads from the digestive tract to the mediastinum, finally leading to death. But it is noteworthy that this patient was initially very weak due to a long time infection and was therefore the patient not able to receive surgical treatment to debride the infected tissues. Therefore, physicians should always pay attention and raise high awareness about possible actinomycetic infections, when an early diagnosis of actinomycosis could significantly improve the clinical outcome [55].

Diagnosis. Any abscesses or persistent infections in the alimentary tract should be suggestive of actinomycosis, although the symptomatic diagnoses of these infectious diseases are often painless [65] and accompanied by other systemic diseases [58, 61, 62]. It is important for physicians to be aware that actinomycosis frequently ‘imitates’ malignancy nocardiosis or tuberculosis [5] as it can spread to distant tissues and organs in the human body progressively to form abscesses, which is analogous to tumor metastasis through invasive mechanisms. The culture of Actinomyces is quite difficult because Actinomyces infections are likely to be polymicrobial as a result of previous antibiotic therapies and therefore more time is needed to culture Actinomyces in an anaerobic environment. On the contrary, inflammation caused by Actinomyces has significant characteristic features. The presence of “sulfur granules” at the infection sites is a typical histopathological change, which often contains abscesses with yellowish sulfur-like granules [66]. Thus, histopathological examination of infected tissue is generally a more sensitive technique compared to bacterial culture, possibly revealing typical yellowish sulfur granules containing filamentous Gram-positive bacilli and inflammatory cells [67].

For suspected actinomycosis in the alimentary tract, endoscopic examinations and CT scans are useful to gain an overview of the lesions. A biopsy should also be used to facilitate a histological examination [58, 59, 62], but, in some cases, actinomycotic infections can be identified after the histological examinations of surgical specimens, as the lesions are resected after misdiagnosis [55, 57]. In a rare case of ascending colon actinomycosis, Filippou et al. applied CT imaging to identify a tumor-like mass. The characteristics of the lesion and the diffuse inflammation of the mesentery suggested it might be a perforated ascending colon tumor, and then surgery was applied to this patient. After the microscopic examination of the surgical specimen, actinomycotic “sulfur granules” were detected [68]. Similarly, Lee et al. applied CT imaging and positron emission tomography to identify a small mass at the origin of the appendix in a 50-year-old woman. All the empirical evidence indicated it should be an appendiceal tumor but the histological examination of the surgical specimen revealed it was actinomycosis of the appendix [56].

Nucleic acid probes and PCR techniques have recently been developed to identify actinomycosis in an accurate and rapid manner. Hansen et al. applied a PCR method with mild decalcification to detect A. israelii in bone specimens and found that the detection sensitivity of these genera was remarkably improved. Therefore, improved molecular methods for the diagnosis of actinomycosis would be one option.

For the Treatment. Actinomyces do not produce beta-lactamases and often are susceptible to beta-lactams antibiotics notably amoxicillin and penicillin G. The effects of other broad-spectrum antibiotics against Actinomyces, such as cephalosporins, ceftriaxone, and piperacillin, remain controversial and the acquisition of resistant flora should be avoided [21, 69, 70]. At the same time, Actinomyces seems not to be sensitive to first-generation cephalosporins. Clavulanic acid, a beta-lactam inhibitor, should be combined to treat actinomycosis if copathogens, e.g., Enterobacteriaceae, have been implicated in the infection [21, 69, 70]. Applying prolonged therapies with high doses of antibiotics is the key to cure actinomycosis as the induration of the infection sites, which means the blood supply would be insufficient for antibiotics to penetrate into the infected tissues. Although prolonged antimicrobial therapy is effective for most patients with actinomycosis, surgery should be considered in complicated cases. For example, patients with widespread necrotic tissues or who are nonresponsive to antibiotic therapy need surgical approaches to drain abscesses and relieve obstructions. In addition, for patients who underwent surgery, antibiotic therapy should be prolonged to prevent the recurrence of the infection [71, 72].

For actinomycosis in the oral cavity, Thukral et al. treated a male patient aged 35 years with intravenous penicillin and metronidazole followed by orally administered antibiotics for between 2 and 4 weeks [73]. For cases of esophageal actinomycosis, systemic intravenous penicillin treatment is usually needed, and the combination of penicillin G and amoxicillin has also been reported [60]. In one patient with gastric actinomycosis, the empiric antibiotic therapy of IV metronidazole and IV levofloxacin were prescribed resulting in a complete cure [58].

6. Possible Relationships between Actinomyces Species and Various Alimentary Tract Diseases

6.1. Periodontal Diseases

Periodontal disease is a type of inflammatory disease caused by biofilm that induces harm to the tooth-supporting tissues. Untreated periodontal disease is able to cause the loosening of teeth, bleeding of the gums and even the loss of teeth [74, 75]. The etiology and pathogenesis of periodontal disease remain unclear but it is believed to have connections with changes in the composition of the microbiota in subgingival tissues and also genetic factors [76]. A recent metagenomic analysis revealed that Prevotella is the most abundant species in periodontal plaque samples, followed by Streptococcus, Corynebacterium, and Actinomyces [77]. Patients with periodontal disease were often found to have overexpression of Bacteroidetes and Porphyromonas gingivalis and a reduced expression of Treponema denticola and Actinomyces [78], suggesting that changes of formation and interactions among microbiota members contributed to periodontal disease. However, further analysis is needed to investigate the association of the heterogenous microbiome with periodontal disease.

Although the occurrence of periodontitis seems not to be related to the Actinomyces species in the oral cavity, as one of the residential microbial communities, the alterations of the proportion of Actinomyces would change the community structure and subsequently change the subgingival ecologies [79]. In addition, Ye et al. revealed that the antibodies induced by Streptococci and Actinomyces could contribute to the progression of periodontitis and perturbation of the epithelial attachment to teeth [80]. Takeuchi et al. also indicated that the products of Actinomyces and the specific immune reactions caused by Actinomyces are able to cause damage to periodontal tissues [81].

6.2. Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Alterations of microbiota are believed to activate immune responses and contribute to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (UC) being the most common types. UC causes inflammation of large intestine, while Crohn’s disease can affect all components of the gastrointestinal tract including the mouth, esophagus, stomach, and small and large intestines. Recent studies on the molecular pathogenesis of IBD have revealed that people with susceptible genes are more likely to have a deficient epithelial barrier function and lack innate and adaptive immunities. [82, 83] Furthermore, commensal bacteria might be the driver of IBD rather than conventional pathogens [84].

The gut microbiome in patients with UC and Crohn’s disease were found to be different from those found in a healthy population and between these two types of IBD as well. Although microbial biodiversity was reduced 30-50% in patients with IBD, overexpression of certain microorganism such as Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria was detected in UC and Enterococcus faecium and Proteobacteria in Crohn’s disease. Current studies have revealed that Actinomyces species are not related to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease, but the changes in the enteric environment and immune factors caused by Actinomyces may aggravate the injuries caused by inflammation [85, 86] Furthermore, Takahashi et al. found that genera Actinomyces and Bifidobacterium increased significantly in pediatric Crohn’s disease patients as determined from fecal samples analyzed by 16s rRNA sequencing [87]. Lewis et al. focused on the microbial dynamics when treating patients with Crohn’s disease. They explored the independent effect of inflammation on the composition of the gut microbiota after therapy and reported that the abundance of Actinomyces was decreased [88].

6.3. Celiac Disease

Celiac disease (CD) is distinguished by intestinal inflammation induced by gluten, proteins found in the normal diet [89]. As a type of autoimmune disease, it is believed that there are certain connections between infections and CD. Holyces et al. indicated that Actinomyces species might be one of the risk factors for the development of CD because A. graevenitzii had an increased abundance in the small intestine of CD patients [90]. However, Fernandez-Feo et al. pointed out that gluten-degrading microorganisms in the upper gastrointestinal tract are able to cleave the toxic gluten fragments, which may give us a novel therapeutic method for the treatment of CD. They also confirmed that A. odontolyticus in the oral cavity had the ability to degrade gluten, which means its gluten-degrading enzymes could be a potential adjunctive therapy for CD patients [91].

7. Further Investigations of the Functions of Actinomyces in Alimentary Canal Diseases Are Required

Actinomycosis in the alimentary tract is rarely seen and the pathogenesis has not been fully studied. According to the retrieved literature, there are no relevant studies about the biological function of the Actinomyces species in the human digestive tract. There is a hypothesis that Actinomyces in the oral cavity would distribute into the esophagus, hepatobiliary, and gastrointestinal tracts accompanied with other pathogenic bacteria to cause infections following poor oral hygiene and oral mucosa trauma [67]. But some studies proved that several Actinomyces species colonized within the infant intestine as normal organisms so that normal Actinomyces species are also able to cause infections [30, 36]. In addition, complex biological interactions among these diverse bacteria and within the digestive tract greatly affect the healthy or disease status of the host [92].

Some cases and studies in animals indicated that the damage of the wall of the digestive tract was one of the leading etiology causes of actinomycosis [93], but primary gastric actinomycosis was also reported [58]. Therefore, further studies on the pathogenesis of the actinomycosis in the alimentary tract are required.

8. Conclusions

Actinomycosis caused by Actinomyces species in the alimentary tract is rare as well as satisfactory prognosis in the case of early diagnosis. Actinomyces species are distributed widely as part of the microbiome in the alimentary tract from the oral to intestinal tract and have different biological functions and clinical features of actinomycosis. Changes of formation and interactions of Actinomyces species with other microbiota members contribute to various alimentary tract diseases such as periodontal disease, IBD, and CD. Further analysis is needed to investigate the mechanisms of pathogenicity of Actinomyces in the context of microbiota in alimentary tract diseases. In addition to bacterial culture and pathological examination, molecular biological techniques including PCR and 16S RNA sequencing have recently been developed for the speedy diagnosis of actinomycosis and to identify accurately the infective Actinomyces species. Patients with actinomycosis may “mimic” other malignancy processes in different locations of the alimentary tract and usually require prolonged antibiotic therapy with or without surgery.


Jun Li, Ying Li, and Yu Zhou are co-first authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


  1. K. Dayan, D. Neufeld, R. Zissin et al., “Actinomycosis of the large bowel: unusual presentations and their surgical treatment,” The European Journal of Surgery, vol. 162, pp. 657–660, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  2. B. A. Yeager, J. Hoxie, R. A. Weisman, M. S. Greenberg, and L. T. Bilaniuk, “Actinomycosis in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome-Related Complex,” Archives of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery, vol. 112, no. 12, pp. 1293–1295, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. J. R. Brown, “Human actinomycosis. A study of 181 subjects,” Human Pathology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 319–330, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. J. Ingle, “Death from Actinomycosis,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 685–685, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. F. Valour, A. Sénéchal, C. Dupieux et al., “Actinomycosis: etiology, clinical features, diagnosis, treatment, and management,” Infection and Drug Resistance, vol. 7, pp. 183–197, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. A. Saleem, Z. Ul Abideen, I. S. Kiani, A. Yousaf, A. Rasheed, and R. W. Shabbir, “Sporadic actinomycosis of the hip complicated by Central Nervous System infection,” The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association, vol. 67, pp. 637–640, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  7. M. Bellesi, P. Di Bella, and L. Provinciali, “Diagnostic difficulties with central nervous system actinomycosis,” Neurological Sciences, vol. 32, pp. 945–947, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. L. Jánoskuti, M. Lengyel, and T. Fenyvesi, “Cardiac actinomycosis in a patient presenting with acute cardiac tamponade and a mass mimicking pericardial tumour,” Heart, vol. 90, no. 5, p. e27, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Radionov, S. Petrov, G. Germanov, J. Gloy, and M. Momtschilov, “Actinomycosis of the distal gastrointestinal tract,” Chirurgische Praxis, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 429–435, 2007. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. E. Kononen and W. G. Wade, “Actinomyces and related organisms in human infections,” Clinical Microbiology Reviews, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 419–442, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. M. D. Collins and C. Pascual, “Reclassification of Actinomyces humiferus (Gledhill and Casida) as Cellulomonas humilata nom. corrig., comb. nov.,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 661–663, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. F. Yassin, H. Hupfer, C. Siering, and P. Schumann, “Comparative chemotaxonomic and phylogenetic studies on the genus Arcanobacterium Collins et al. 1982 emend. Lehnen et al. 2006: proposal for Trueperella gen. nov. and emended description of the genus Arcanobacterium,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 6, pp. 1265–1274, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. Greub and D. Raoult, “"Actinobaculum massiliae," a new species causing chronic urinary tract infection,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 40, no. 11, pp. 3938–3941, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. V. Hall, M. D. Collins, R. A. Hutson, E. Falsen, E. Inganäs, and B. I. Duerden, “Actinobaculum urinale sp. nov., from human urine,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 679–682, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. K. P. Schaal and H.-J. Lee, “Actinomycete infections in humans-a review,” Gene, vol. 115, no. 1-2, pp. 201–211, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. R. A. Smego Jr. and G. Foglia, “Actinomycosis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 26, pp. 1255–1261, 1998, quiz 1262-1253. View at Google Scholar
  17. M. W. Felz and M. R. Smith, “Disseminated actinomycosis: multisystem mimicry in primary care,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 96, pp. 294–299, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  18. W. Topley, Topley & Wilson’s Microbiology and Microbial Infections, vol. 3, Hodder Arnold, 1998.
  19. R. Adar, E. Antebi, R. David, and M. Mozes, “Abdominal actinomycosis,” Israel Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 148–153, 1972. View at Google Scholar
  20. V. K. Wong, T. D. Turmezei, and V. C. Weston, “Actinomycosis,” BMJ, vol. 343, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. B. K. Adams and J. H. Crosier, “Bone and gallium scintigraphy in polyostotic actinomycosis of the upper limb,” Clinical Nuclear Medicine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 254–256, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. K. P. Schaal and G. Pulverer, Biological, Biochemical, and Biomedical Aspects of Actinomycetes, Academic Press, 1984.
  23. J. M. Slack and M. Gerencser, Actinomyces, Filamentous Bacteria, Burgess Publishing Company, 1975.
  24. J. F. Yeguez, S. A. Martinez, L. R. Sands, and M. D. Hellinger, “Pelvic actinomycosis presenting as malignant large bowel obstruction: a case report and a review of the literature,” The American Surgeon, vol. 66, pp. 85–90, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  25. H. Tlaskalová-Hogenová, R. Tpánková, H. Kozáková et al., “The role of gut microbiota (commensal bacteria) and the mucosal barrier in the pathogenesis of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases and cancer: Contribution of germ-free and gnotobiotic animal models of human diseases,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 110–120, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. S. Kumar, E. J. Leys, J. M. Bryk, F. J. Martinez, M. L. Moeschberger, and A. L. Griffen, “Changes in periodontal health status are associated with bacterial community shifts as assessed by quantitative 16S cloning and sequencing,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 3665–3673, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. A. García-Lafuente, M. Antolín, F. Guarner et al., “Derangement of mucosal barrier function by bacteria colonizing the rat colonic mucosa,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 1019–1026, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. I. Hanning and S. Diaz-Sanchez, “The functionality of the gastrointestinal microbiome in non-human animals,” Microbiome, vol. 3, article 51, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Huttenhower, D. Gevers, R. Knight et al., “Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome,” Nature, vol. 486, no. 7402, pp. 207–214, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. N. Sarkonen, E. Könönen, P. Summanen, A. Kanervo, A. Takala, and H. Jousimies-Somer, “Oral colonization with Actinomyces species in infants by two years of age,” Journal of Dental Research, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 864–867, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. F. E. Dewhirst, T. Chen, J. Izard et al., “The human oral microbiome,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 192, no. 19, pp. 5002–5017, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. W. F. Liljemark, C. G. Bloomquist, C. L. Bandt, B. L. Pihlstrom, J. E. Hinrichs, and L. F. Wolff, “Comparison of the distribution of Actinomyces in dental plaque on inserted enamel and natural tooth surfaces in periodontal health and disease,” Oral microbiology and immunology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–15, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. L. Abusleme, A. K. Dupuy, N. Dutzan et al., “The subgingival microbiome in health and periodontitis and its relationship with community biomass and inflammation,” The ISME Journal, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 1016–1025, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. T. Chou, K. S. Cheng, and I. P. Chiang, “Esophageal actinomycosis,” Advances in Therapy, vol. 23, pp. 623–626, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. M. Hansen, H. Fjeldsøe-Nielsen, S. Sulim, M. Kemp, and J. J. Christensen, “Actinomyces species: a danish survey on human infections and microbiological characteristics,” The Open Microbiology Journal, vol. 3, pp. 113–120, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  36. C. F. Favier, E. E. Vaughan, W. M. de Vos, and A. D. L. Akkermans, “Molecular monitoring of succession of bacterial communities in human neonates,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 219–226, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. L. A. Ximénez-Fyvie, A. D. Haffajee, L. Martin, A. Tanner, P. Macuch, and S. S. Socransky, “Identification of oral Actinomyces species using DNA probes,” Oral microbiology and immunology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 257–265, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. K. L. Tyrrell, D. M. Citron, Y. A. Warren, S. Nachnani, and E. J. Goldstein, “Anaerobic bacteria cultured from the tongue dorsum of subjects with oral malodor,” Anaerobe, vol. 9, pp. 243–246, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  39. A. Jensen, H. Fagö-Olsen, C. H. Sørensen, and M. Kilian, “Molecular mapping to species level of the tonsillar crypt microbiota associated with health and recurrent tonsillitis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, Article ID e5641, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  40. C. T. Chao, C. H. Liao, C. C. Lai, and P. R. Hsueh, “Liver abscess due to Actinomyces odontolyticus in an immunocompetent patient,” Infection, vol. 39, pp. 77–79, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  41. V. Hinić, C. Straub, E. Schultheiss, P. Kaempfer, R. Frei, and D. Goldenberger, “Identification of a novel 16S rRNA gene variant of actinomyces funkei from six patients with purulent infections,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. E312–E314, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. L. Riegert-Johnson, N. Sandhu, S. V. Rajkumar, and R. Patel, “Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura associated with a hepatic abscess due to Actinomyces turicensis,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 35, pp. 636-637, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  43. T. R. Tempel, R. Snyderman, H. V. Jordan, and S. E. Mergenhagen, “Factors from saliva and oral bacteria, chemotactic for polymorphonuclear leukocytes: their possible role in gingival inflammation.,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 71–80, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. U. B. Bak, H. Yamamoto, and R. Azuma, “Experimental actinomycotic abscess in mice of several strains.,” National Institute of Animal Health quarterly, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 232-233, 1972. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. D. Engel, D. Van Epps, and J. Clagett, “In vivo and in vitro studies on possible pathogenic mechanisms of Actinomyces viscosus,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 548–554, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. H. V. Jordan, D. M. Kelly, and J. D. Heeley, “Enhancement of experimental actinomycosis in mice by Eikenella corrodens,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 367–371, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. W. Papaioannou, S. Gizani, A. D. Haffajee, M. Quirynen, E. Mamai-Homata, and L. Papagiannoulis, “The microbiota on different oral surfaces in healthy children,” Oral microbiology and immunology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 183–189, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. D. Preza, I. Olsen, J. A. Aas, T. Willumsen, B. Grinde, and B. J. Paster, “Bacterial profiles of root caries in elderly patients,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2015–2021, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. R. J. Gibbons, D. I. Hay, J. O. Cisar, and W. B. Clark, “Adsorbed salivary proline-rich protein 1 and statherin: Receptors for type 1 fimbriae of Actinomyces viscosus T14V-J1 on apatitic surfaces,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 56, no. 11, pp. 2990–2993, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. O. Cisar, P. E. Kolenbrander, and F. C. McIntire, “Specificity of coaggregation reactions between human oral streptococci and strains of Actinomyces viscosus or Actinomyces naeslundii,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 742–752, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. N. Takahashi and T. Yamada, “Stimulatory effect of bicarbonate on the glycolysis of Actinomyces viscosus and its biochemical mechanism,” Oral microbiology and immunology, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 165–170, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. N. Dame-Teixeira, C. C. Parolo, M. Maltz, A. Tugnait, D. Devine, and T. Do, “Actinomyces spp. gene expression in root caries lesions,” Journal of Oral Microbiology, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID 32383, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. E. Morou-Bermudez and R. A. Burne, “Genetic and physiologic characterization of urease of Actinomyces naeslundii,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 504–512, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Biswas, D. F. Duperon, and F. S. Chebib, “Study of periodontal disease in children and young adolescents: I. Effect of age, sex and gingival inflammation on crevice fluid volume, pocket depth, pH of supragingival plaque and crevice, collagenase activity and urea,” Journal of Periodontal Research, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 250–264, 1977. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. F. Branquinho, D. R. Andrade, N. Almeida, and C. Sofia, “Mediastinitis by Actinomyces meyeri after oesophageal stent placement,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2014, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. S.-Y. Lee, H.-J. Kwon, J.-H. Cho et al., “Actinomycosis of the appendix mimicking appendiceal tumor: a case report,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 395–397, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. S. Tajima, M. Waki, A. Ohata, K. Koda, and Y. Maruyama, “Xanthogranulomatous gastritis associated with actinomycosis: Report of a case presenting as a large submucosal mass,” International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1013–1018, 2015. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. K. Al-Obaidy, F. Alruwaii, A. Al Nemer, R. Alsulaiman, Z. Alruwaii, and M. A. Shawarby, “Primary gastric actinomycosis: report of a case diagnosed in a gastroscopic biopsy,” BMC Clinical Pathology, vol. 15, no. 1, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. S. A. Lee, G. W. Palmer, and E. L. Cooney, “Esophageal actinomycosis in a patient with AIDS,” The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine, vol. 74, pp. 383–389, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  60. S. Mohanty, “Actinomycosis of faucial tonsil masquerading as oropharyngeal malignancy,” Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, vol. 58, pp. 82–84, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  61. S. P. Pasupathy, D. Chakravarthy, S. Chanmougananda, and P. P. Nair, “Periapical actinomycosis,” BMJ Case Reports, vol. 2012, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  62. R. D. Welling, D. M. Cardona, and W. M. Thompson, “Esophageal actinomycosis: a case report and review of radiographic findings,” Journal of Radiology Case Reports, vol. 3, pp. 44–48, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  63. S. D. Mahlen, J. E. Clarridge, and 3rd., “Site and clinical significance of Alloscardovia omnicolens and Bifidobacterium species isolated in the clinical laboratory,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 47, no. 10, pp. 3289–3293, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. P. Peitsidis, C. Papadimitriou, A. Rodolakis, and A. Peitsidou, “Actinomycosis of the appendix and pelvis: A case report,” Obstetrics, Gynaecology and Reproductive Medicine, vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 711–713, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. D. A. Hirshberg, D. I. Tsesis, P. Z. Metzger, and D. I. Kaplan, “Periapical actinomycosis: In reply,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, vol. 96, no. 4, p. 386, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  66. J. E. Heffner, “Pleuropulmonary manifestations of actinomycosis and nocardiosis,” Seminars in Respiratory Infections, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 352–361, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. D. F. Bennhoff, “Actinomycosis: diagnostic and therapeutic considerations and a review of 32 cases,” The Laryngoscope, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1198–1217, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. D. Filippou, C. Triantopoulou, C. Kolimpiris, and S. Rizos, “Primary combined intra- and extra-abdominal actinomycosis. A case report,” Romanian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 337–340, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. Atad, “Pelvic actinomycosis. Is long-term antibiotic therapy necessary?” The Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 44, pp. 939–944, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  70. J. T. Badgett and G. Adams, “Mandibular actinomycosis treated with oral clindamycin,” The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 221–223, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. V. Joshi, A. Koulaouzidis, S. McGoldrick, M. Tighe, and C. Tan, “Actinomycotic liver abscess: A rare complication of colonic diverticular disease,” Annals of Hepatology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 96–98, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. G. L. Mandell, J. E. Bennett, and R. Dolin, Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2010.
  73. R. Thukral, K. Shrivastav, V. Mathur, A. Barodiya, and S. Shrivastav, “Actinomyces, a deceptive infection of oral cavity,” Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons, vol. 43, pp. 282–285, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  74. Consensus Report, “Periodontal diseases: pathogenesis and microbial factors,” Annals of Periodontology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 926–932, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. “Proceedings of the 1996 World Workshop in Periodontics. Lansdowne, Virginia, July 13-17, 1996,” Annals of Periodontology, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–947, 1996.
  76. R. Teles, F. Teles, J. Frias-Lopez, B. Paster, and A. Haffajee, “Lessons learned and unlearned in periodontal microbiology,” Periodontology 2000, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 95–162, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. J. Wang, J. Qi, H. Zhao et al., “Metagenomic sequencing reveals microbiota and its functional potential associated with periodontal disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 3, no. 1, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. J. J. Zambon, H. S. Reynolds, and J. Slots, “Black-pigmented Bacteroides Spp. in the human oral cavity,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 198–203, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. R. Lira-Junior and C. M. Figueredo, “Periodontal and inflammatory bowel diseases: Is there evidence of complex pathogenic interactions?” World Journal of Gastroenterolog, vol. 22, pp. 7963–7972, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  80. P. Ye, D. W. S. Harty, C. C. Chapple, M. A. Nadkarni, A. A. D. E. Carlo, and N. Hunter, “Streptococci and Actinomyces induce antibodies which cross react with epithelial antigens in periodontitis,” Clinical & Experimental Immunology, vol. 131, no. 3, pp. 468–476, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. H. Takeuchi, J. Kanehisa, Y. Hori, A. Tani, and H. Sagawa, “Immunopathological study of periodontal disease V-I. Actinomyces antigens in the gingiva of individual with periodontal disease,” Journal of Oral Biosciences, vol. 23, pp. 739–744, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  82. Y. Huang and Z. Chen, “Inflammatory bowel disease related innate immunity and adaptive immunity,” American Journal of Translational Research, vol. 8, pp. 2490–2497, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  83. G. Zanello, D. Kevans, A. Goethel, M. Silverberg, A. Tyler, and K. Croitoru, “Genetics and innate and adaptive immunity in IBD,” Nestle Nutrition Institute Workshop Series, vol. 79, pp. 41–55, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. G. Loh and M. Blaut, “Role of commensal gut bacteria in inflammatory bowel diseases,” Gut Microbes, vol. 3, pp. 544–555, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  85. K. Lin, S. Lin, A. N. Lin, T. Lin, Z. M. Htun, and M. Reddy, “A rare thermophilic bug in complicated diverticular abscess,” Case Reports in Gastroenterology, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 569–575, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. Nahum, G. Filice, and A. Malhotra, “Complicated thread: abdominal actinomycosis in a young woman with crohn disease,” Case Reports in Gastroenterology, vol. 11, pp. 377–381, 2017. View at Google Scholar
  87. K. Takahashi, A. Nishida, T. Fujimoto et al., “Reduced abundance of butyrate-producing bacteria species in the fecal microbial community in Crohn's disease,” Digestion, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. D. Lewis, “Inflammation, antibiotics, and diet as environmental stressors of the gut microbiome in pediatric crohn’s disease,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 18, pp. 489–500, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  89. NIDDKD, “Celiac disease,” 2015,
  90. L. Hoyles, H. Honda, N. A. Logan, G. Halket, R. M. La Ragione, and A. L. McCartney, “Recognition of greater diversity of Bacillus species and related bacteria in human faeces,” Research in Microbiology, vol. 163, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. M. Fernandez-Feo, G. Wei, G. Blumenkranz et al., “The cultivable human oral gluten-degrading microbiome and its potential implications in coeliac disease and gluten sensitivity,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. E386–E394, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. M. Derrien, M. van Passel, J. van de Bovenkamp, R. Schipper, W. M. de Vos, and J. Dekker, “Mucin-bacterial interactions in the human oral cavity and digestive tract,” Gut Microbes, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 254–268, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. J. J. Crawford, “Interaction of Actinomyces organisms with cationic polypeptides. I. Histochemical studies of infected human and animal tissues,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 632–641, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus