Review Article
The VAD Scheme versus Thalidomide plus VAD for Reduction of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Multiple Myeloma: A Meta-Analysis
Table 2
VAD-treated vs. T-VAD-treated MM patients.
| Study | Stage | Patients | Age (years) | Comparison | Trial conditions and units | I/II/III | Control (M/F) | Exp (M/F) | Control/Exp | Control | Exp |
| Cong et al., 2012 [27] | 4/12/30 | 23 | 23 | 65/68 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (ng/L) | Yang et al., 2015 [29] | 6/26/58 | 43 (23/20) | 47 (25/22) | 67.4/66.9 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (pg/ml) | Long et al., 2015 [30] | 0/19/71 | 45 (26/19) | 45 (27/18) | 56.4/55.3 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (ng/L) | Yuan et al., 2004 [31] | 10/31/12 | 30 (18/12) | 23 (15/8) | 62/61 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (ng/L) | Liu et al., 2016 [32] | 0/24/26 | 25 (12/13) | 25 (13/12) | 67.1/67.1 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (pg/ml) | Tan et al., 2008 [33] | 11/33/12 | 28 (16/12) | 28 (15/13) | 62/61 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (ng/L) | Yang et al., 2005 [34] | 0/ 8/76 | 45 (31/14) | 39 (29/10) | 51.5/52.3 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (ng/L) | Dong, 2004 [28] | 7/8/19 | 6 | 6 | 31.3/49.8 | VAD | T-VAD | ELISA VEGF (ng/L) |
|
|