Research Article
Comparison between Two Radiological Methods for Assessment of Tooth Root Resorption: An In Vitro Study
Table 1
Tooth length without tooth resorption.
| Tooth number | Real tooth length | Radiological measurements using traditional endooral X-rays | Radiological measurements using panoramic radiographs | Radiological measurements using digital endooral X-rays | Total | Var.% | Total | Var.% | Total | Var.% | Total |
| 11 | 24.84 | 4.31% | 25.91 | 8.86% | 27.04 | 3.38% | 25.68 | 12 | 21.80 | 5.73% | 23.05 | 11.56% | 24.32 | 5.47% | 22.99 | 13 | 28.06 | 4.49% | 29.32 | 10.83% | 31.10 | 5.63% | 29.64 | 14 | 24.60 | 1.38% | 24.94 | 9.02% | 26.82 | 0.41% | 24.70 | 21 | 24.86 | 4.42% | 25.96 | 13.19% | 28.14 | 2.96% | 25.60 | 22 | 22.50 | 3.60% | 23.31 | 12.53% | 25.32 | 12.94% | 25.41 | 23 | 28.24 | 4.92% | 29.63 | 11.19% | 31.40 | 4.25% | 29.44 | 24 | 20.20 | 7.13% | 21.64 | 5.45% | 21.30 | 5.64% | 21.34 | 25 | 22.60 | 3.54% | 23.40 | 11.50% | 25.20 | 5.78% | 23.91 | 31 | 21.80 | 3.67% | 22.60 | 13.30% | 24.70 | 3.04% | 22.46 | 32 | 22.16 | 4.74% | 23.21 | 18.41% | 26.24 | 1.89% | 22.58 | 33 | 26.82 | 2.68% | 27.54 | 23.79% | 33.20 | 0.74% | 27.02 | 34 | 19.74 | 6.69% | 21.06 | 21.58% | 24.00 | 1.89% | 20.11 | 35 | 20.14 | 2.78% | 20.70 | 11.22% | 22.40 | 1.54% | 20.45 | 41 | 21.30 | 9.86% | 23.40 | 16.81% | 24.88 | 5.32% | 22.43 | 42 | 22.38 | 3.22% | 23.10 | 13.14% | 25.32 | 0.18% | 22.42 | 43 | 27.70 | 4.12% | 28.84 | 15.81% | 32.08 | 0.36% | 27.80 | 44 | 20.76 | 4.91% | 21.78 | 13.68% | 23.60 | 0.29% | 20.82 | 45 | 20.20 | 4.46% | 21.10 | 20.89% | 24.42 | 5.63% | 21.34 |
|
|