Research Article

Comparison between Two Radiological Methods for Assessment of Tooth Root Resorption: An In Vitro Study

Table 1

Tooth length without tooth resorption.

Tooth numberReal tooth lengthRadiological measurements using traditional endooral X-raysRadiological measurements using panoramic radiographs Radiological measurements using digital endooral X-rays
TotalVar.%TotalVar.%TotalVar.%Total

1124.844.31%25.918.86%27.043.38%25.68
1221.805.73%23.0511.56%24.325.47%22.99
1328.064.49%29.3210.83%31.105.63%29.64
1424.601.38%24.949.02%26.820.41%24.70
2124.864.42%25.9613.19%28.142.96%25.60
2222.503.60%23.3112.53%25.3212.94%25.41
2328.244.92%29.6311.19%31.404.25%29.44
2420.207.13%21.645.45%21.305.64%21.34
2522.603.54%23.4011.50%25.205.78%23.91
3121.803.67%22.6013.30%24.703.04%22.46
3222.164.74%23.2118.41%26.241.89%22.58
3326.822.68%27.5423.79%33.200.74%27.02
3419.746.69%21.0621.58%24.001.89%20.11
3520.142.78%20.7011.22%22.401.54%20.45
4121.309.86%23.4016.81%24.885.32%22.43
4222.383.22%23.1013.14%25.320.18%22.42
4327.704.12%28.8415.81%32.080.36%27.80
4420.764.91%21.7813.68%23.600.29%20.82
4520.204.46%21.1020.89%24.425.63%21.34