Thromboelastography and Thromboelastometry in Assessment of Fibrinogen Deficiency and Prediction for Transfusion Requirement: A Descriptive Review

Peng, Henry T.; Nascimento, Bartolomeu; Beckett, Andrew

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7020539

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Conclusions Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 7020539 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7020539

Thromboelastography and Thromboelastometry in Assessment of Fibrinogen Deficiency and Prediction for Transfusion Requirement: A Descriptive Review

Henry T. Peng,^1,2Bartolomeu Nascimento,³and Andrew Beckett⁴

Academic Editor: François Berthiaume

Received28 May 2018

Revised28 Sept 2018

Accepted06 Nov 2018

Published25 Nov 2018

Abstract

Fibrinogen is crucial for the formation of blood clot and clinical outcomes in major bleeding. Both Thromboelastography (TEG) and Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) have been increasingly used to diagnose fibrinogen deficiency and guide fibrinogen transfusion in trauma and surgical bleeding patients. We conducted a comprehensive and comparative review on the technologies and clinical applications of two typical functional fibrinogen assays using TEG (FF TEG) and ROTEM (FIBTEM) for assessment of fibrinogen level and deficiency, and prediction of transfusion requirement. Clot strength and firmness of FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM were the most used parameters, and their associations with fibrinogen levels as measured by Clauss method ranged from 0 to 0.9 for FF TEG and 0.27 to 0.94 for FIBTEM. A comparison of the interchangeability and clinical performance of the functional fibrinogen assays using the two systems showed that the results were correlated, but are not interchangeable between the two systems. It appears that ROTEM FIBTEM showed better associations with the Clauss method and more clinical use for monitoring fibrinogen deficiency and predicting transfusion requirements including fibrinogen replacement than FF TEG. TEG and ROTEM functional fibrinogen tests play important roles in the diagnosis of fibrinogen-related coagulopathy and guidance of transfusion requirements. Despite the fact that high-quality evidence is still needed, the two systems are likely to remain popular for the hemostatic management of bleeding patients.

1. Introduction

Fibrinogen is perhaps the most important protein in hemostasis, as the final stage of the coagulation cascade is converted to fibrin by thrombin and cross-linked by factor XIII. It also induces platelet activation and aggregation via binding to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors on the surface of platelets, acting as the bridge for stable clot formation [1]. During major bleeding, fibrinogen is the first clotting factor to reach critically low levels below the normal physiological level of around 2 to 4 g/L, which is associated with increased bleeding, coagulopathy, and in turn worsened clinical outcomes [2–5]. Fibrinogen is an independent predictor of mortality in major trauma patients [6].

Thromboelastography (TEG; Haemonetics Corporation, Haemoscope Division, Nile, Illinois, USA) and Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM; Tem Innovations GmbH, Munich, Germany; succeeded by Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) are two point-of-care systems for hemostatic tests in whole blood [7]. Both have been increasingly used to diagnose fibrinogen deficiency [8], predict risk of bleeding and mortality, and guide fibrinogen transfusion in trauma [9], cardiac surgery [10], liver transplantation [11], and postpartum bleeding [12]. TEG- and ROTEM-based algorithms have been widely used to direct fibrinogen administration in different settings leading to reduction in transfusion needs, costs, adverse outcomes, and even mortality [13–16] although a recent review indicated that the benefit of reduced blood products (red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet) and improved morbidity in bleeding patients with the application of TEG- or ROTEM-guided transfusion strategies were primarily based on trials of elective cardiac surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass, with low-quality evidence [17]. Similarly, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the use of TEG and ROTEM in goal-directing treatment with allogeneic blood products in bleeding patients found that the amount of transfused red blood cells, fresh frozen plasma, and bleeding volume was reduced in the TEG- or ROTEM-guided groups compared to the control groups either treated at the clinician’s discretion or based on conventional coagulation tests (CCTs), whereas there were no differences in platelet transfusion and mortality [18]. Furthermore, a randomized clinical trial has concluded that TEG-guided massive transfusion protocol for severe trauma improved survival compared with that guided by CCTs (i.e., prothrombin time [PT]/international normalized ratio [INR], fibrinogen, and D-dimer) and utilized less plasma and platelet transfusion during the early phase of resuscitation [19].

Nevertheless, another recent review on routine use of viscoelastic blood tests for diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathic bleeding concluded that TEG and ROTEM tests only reduced red blood cells and platelet transfusion in adults undergoing cardiac surgery [20]. Meta-analyses across all indications (trauma, cardiac surgery, and liver transplantation) have shown that TEG and ROTEM tests are cost-saving and more effective than standard laboratory tests in trauma patients and patients undergoing cardiac surgery [21]. Moreover, studies, including ours, have shown that TEG and ROTEM provide different results for diagnosing coagulopathy and guiding transfusion [22–24]. Further evaluation of TEG- or ROTEM-guided transfusion in prospective case-matched studies and different patient categories with low risk of bias is needed. Alternatively, TEG and ROTM have also been used to study the effects of fibrinogen supplementation on hemostasis in an in vitro model of dilutional coagulopathy [25], the correction of dilutional coagulopathy by fibrinogen concentrate in orthopedic patients [26], and hypothermic coagulopathy [27] as well as in patient blood [28].

Although the role of TEG and ROTEM in diagnosis of coagulopathy, prediction of transfusion and mortality in bleeding patients has been reviewed [12, 29]. This paper is focused on the studies on TEG and ROTEM functional fibrinogen tests: FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM for the diagnosis of fibrinogen deficiency and prediction of transfusion requirements in bleeding patients. A follow-up paper will be focused on the use of FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM to guide fibrinogen replacement and monitor its hemostatic effects.

The paper is structured into four major sections. The first session describes the principles of the two systems and various commercially available tests with an emphasis on functional fibrinogen tests. The second session reviews the use of TEG and ROTEM for measurement of functional fibrinogen levels in relation to fibrinogen concentration assays. The third session discusses the diagnosis of fibrinogen related coagulopathy and prediction of transfusion requirements in different clinical settings. Finally, the review compares the two systems in terms of reagents, parameter values, and clinical uses.

2. Principles of TEG and ROTEM Functional Fibrinogen Tests

TEG 5000 (Haemonetics Corporation, Haemoscope Division, Niles, IL, USA) and ROTEM delta (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA, USA) are the most used viscoelastic hemostasis analyzers. Both systems measure the viscoelastic properties of blood as it clots under low shear stress based on pin-and-cup technology, but there are primary hardware differences between the two [68]. The TEG analyzer has a pin suspended by a torsion wire, wherein a cup oscillates through 4.75 degree/5 seconds. In contrast, the ROTEM analyzer has an immobile cup, wherein a pin/wire transduction system oscillates through 4.75 degree/6 seconds. It has been suggested that the ROTEM system uses a ball-bearing system for power transduction, which makes it less susceptible to movement and vibration [69] and that the automatic pipetting may ensure less variations among operations [70].

In addition to the differences in instrument, the two viscoelastic point-of-care systems used different reagents for various tests and applications [68]. Specifically, the functional fibrinogen reagent for TEG is composed of lyophilized tissue factor and a platelet inhibitor (abciximab) that binds to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors to inhibit platelet aggregation and exclude the platelet contribution to clot strength [71]. However, it could contain kaolin or celite instead of tissue factor [32, 43]. ROTEM fibrinogen assay uses two solutions called ex-tem and fib-tem [71]. The ex-tem solution contains a combination of recombinant tissue factor and phospholipids that activates the extrinsic pathway of the coagulation system, while the fib-tem solution contains CaCl₂ as a recalcification reagent and a platelet inhibitor (cytochalasin D) that inhibits actin/myosin-system. A new reagent called fib-tem plus contains 2 platelet inhibitors, cytochalasin D, which inhibits platelet cytoskeletal reorganization, and tirofiban, which is a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor similar to abciximab that prevents fibrinogen from binding to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors on the surface of platelets and platelet aggregation [48]. Furthermore, single portion reagents composed of all lyophilized reagents required for each ROTEM test have been developed [72].

Although multiple parameters can be measured for blood coagulation and fibrinolysis, maximum amplitude MA in TEG and maximum clot strength MCF in ROTEM have been mostly used as a direct measure of fibrinogen functions. According to each manufacturer, the normal range of MA as measured by FF TEG using citrated blood is 11-24 mm (Guide to functional fibrinogen) and the normal range of MCF as measured by ROTEM FIBTEM assay is 7-24 mm (Instructions for use of fib-tem). In addition, the clot firmness at 5, 10, and 15 min after CT (A5, A10, and A15) has been reported.

It should be noted that new and fully automated (no pipetting) TEG and ROTEM systems (TEG 6s and ROTEM sigma) are now commercially available. Both work with 4-channel cartridges based on different mechanisms. TEG 6s uses a new technology called coagulation resonance analysis and works with two types of cartridges. One is a global hemostasis cartridge to perform four tests (kaolin TEG, kaolin TEG with heparinase, RapidTEG, and FF TEG) simultaneously and the other is a Platelet Mapping cartridge to perform the TEG Plate Mapping test (kaolin TEG, activator F (ActF), adenosine diphosphate (ADP), and arachidonic acid (AA) [73, 74]. ROTEM sigma operates on the proven pin and cup technology as ROTEM delta, but uses two types of cartridges containing lyophilized beads reagents instead of liquid reagents for four tests per cartridge (cartridge 1: FIBTEM, EXTEM, INTEM, APTEM; cartridge 2: FIBTEM, EXTEM, INTEM, HEPTEM) [75].

3. Methods

A PubMed search was completed for the TEG and ROTEM studies involving functional fibrinogen tests. The search terms were as follows: thrombelastogra or thromboelastogra or TEG and fibrinogen, thromboelastomentr or thrombelastromentr or ROTEM and fibrinogen. The specific clinical use/interest of TEG and ROTEM (e.g., trauma, cardiac surgery, transfusion, hypofibrinogenemia, hypo, and hyperfibrinolysis) was also used as keywords in the search. Abstracts were used to determine the relevance and when appropriate, further review of the original articles was warranted. Additional publications were selected from the cross-references listed in the original papers and from the citing articles, and additional search was made through Medline, Scopus, and Institute of Scientific Information databases for those topics with limited findings from PubMed. The search was primarily focused on human studies.

We analyzed the correlations between functional fibrinogen assays, i.e., Clauss method and FF TEG or ROTEM FIBTEM tests, and the accuracies (sensitivity, specificity, and area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve) of FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM for the detection of hypofibrinogenemia and prediction of bleeding and transfusion. Furthermore, data were extracted and pooled from different trials where FF TEG MA, ROTEM FIBTEM MCF versus plasma fibrinogen concentration data were reported. Linear regression with 95% confidence interval was then performed using SigmaPlot Version 13.0 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, California, USA). We also calculated likelihood ratios of FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM for the diagnosis of hypofibrinogenemia defined as plasma fibrinogen level < 1.5 g/L using the following formula: sensitivity/(1-specificity) [76]. Meta-analysis of the clinical benefit of functional fibrinogen assays using TEG and ROTEM within their different uses could not be conducted due to the small sample size and heterogeneity of studies.

4. Measurement of Fibrinogen Levels and Functions

TEG has been used to study in vitro effects of fibrinogen on coagulation of plasma deficient in coagulation factors and diluted by colloids [77, 78], and the effect of a cardiopulmonary bypass system with biocompatible coating on fibrinogen levels [38]. ROTEM has been used to determine the usefulness of fibrinogen substitution to reverse dilutional coagulopathy in in vitro and in vivo models [79–81]. All these studies showed that, to various extents, fibrinogen improved clot strength (MA or MCF), clot formation (R or CT), and clot propagation (Alpha) as measured by TEG or ROTEM.

Clinical studies showed variable correlations between maximum clot strength/firmness and fibrinogen levels as summarized in Table 1. The correlation coefficients range from 0 (no significant correlation) [37] to 0.9 (strong correlation) [42] for FF TEG and 0.27 [3] to 0.94 [47] for ROTEM FIBTEM. The correlations between A5, A10, or A15 and fibrinogen levels have also been reported [34, 44, 45, 51, 53, 57, 59]. These early values of clot firmness can provide fast and reliable prediction of MCF to guide haemostatic therapy in severe bleeding [82]. Other ROTEM tests (e.g., EXTEM) showed certain degrees of correlations with plasma fibrinogen concentrations as well [50, 55]. Both FF TEG and ROTEM FITBEM have been used in clinical settings of trauma [30, 32–34, 46], cardiac surgery [36, 37, 39, 49, 52], liver transplantation [42, 54], and pregnancy [43, 59] with different popularities. In addition, ROTEM FIBTEM has been used for assessment of fibrinogen function in neurosurgery [60], burn injury [61], and cirrhosis [62]. The variations in the correlations could be due to the differences in study population and range of fibrinogen concentrations as most TEG and ROTEM tests were performed using TEG 5000 and ROTEM delta with the same reagent and procedures as recommended by their manufacturers. For example, one study reported no significant correlations between either TEG functional fibrinogen level (FLEV) or maximal amplitude (MA) and Clauss fibrinogen level at baseline or 10 min postprotamine in cardiac surgery patients [37]. The different correlations were also reported for children at different ages [40, 41].

Figure 1(a) shows the correlation between plasma fibrinogen concentration measured by the Clauss method and FF TEG MA based on the data extracted from several studies. Overall correlation from pooled literature data was strong. Similarly, Figure 1(b) shows an overall strong correlation between the Clauss fibrinogen and FIBTEM MCF from pooled data extracted from the literature.

(a)

(b)

Figure 1

Correlations of Clauss fibrinogen level with FF TEG MA (a) and with ROTEM FIBTEM MCF (b). The correlation coefficients were obtained through linear regression of all data extracted from the literature. The data were pooled from different clinical studies involving a total of 275 patients for the correlation between Clauss fibrinogen level and FF TEG MA [30, 35, 42, 43] and a total of 626 patients for the correlation between Clauss fibrinogen level and ROTEM FIBTEM MCF [30, 35, 48, 52, 56]. The means ± standard deviations of FF TEG MA and Clauss fibrinogen level in (a) are 20.14±8.28 mm and 2.71±1.32 g/L. The means ± standard deviations of ROTEM FIBTEM MCF and Clauss fibrinogen level in (b) are 15.40±7.86 mm and 2.74±1.22 g/L.

The Clauss assay is considered a standard functional test for fibrinogen concentration by determination of the time in seconds to clot formation following addition of excess thrombin [83]. Other methods such as prothrombin time-derived method [56] and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) [83] are also used. ELISA does not discriminate between functional and non-functional immunoreactive fibrinogen protein, and even some degraded forms of fibrinogen [84].

The Clauss method is limited to only small concentrations of heparin (which inactivates thrombin through anti-thrombin III), which is a serious limitation in cardiac surgery. It may be affected by fibrin degradation products, polymerization inhibitors as other inhibitors of fibrin formation [85]. Its turnaround time is approximately 40 min [86]. In comparison, TEG and ROTEM function fibrinogen assays can be completed in 15 min and can provide rapid and accurate detection of hyperfibrinolysis [87]. Another advantage of TEG and ROTEM is that they can be used for fully heparinised patients, e.g., when on cardiopulmonary bypass, with the use of a heparinase TEG cup or heparinase. In vitro studies showed that FF TEG MA was unaffected by heparin levels up to 2.8 IU/mL, but was reduced at 5.6 IU/mL of heparin in blood even performed in heparinase TEG cups [71], while ROTEM FIBTEM MCF was insensitive to heparin up to a concentration of 4 IU/ml in whole blood, but then declined to values less than 50% of baseline at 8 IU/mL [88]. A clinical study in pediatric cardiac surgery validated the use of FIBTEM in the presence of very high heparin concentrations (400 IU/kg bodyweight) [89].

The correlations between Clauss fibrinogen concentration and FF TEG MA or ROTEM FIBTEM MCF could be affected by a number of factors in addition to heparin concentration. As elucidated in Table 1, different reagents and instruments produced by Stago, Siemens, and Instrumentation Laboratory are used to quantify fibrinogen concentration. It is known that there can be systematic differences between the fibrinogen concentrations obtained with various commercial kits [90]. The different detections used in the Clauss method and resuscitation fluids administered may affect the correlation [91, 92]. This is likely due to the fact that FIBTEM test is more affected than fibrinogen concentration assays by the fluids [93]. Solomon et al. examined correlations between ROTEM FIBTEM MCF and Clauss fibrinogen concentration as determined using photo-optical, mechanical, and electromechanical detections in cardiac surgery patients [91]. The correlations obtained from the photo-optical and electromechanical methods (r=0.82 and 0.81) were greater than the mechanical method (r=0.73 and 0.71). Fenger-Eriksen et al. assessed fibrinogen levels in plasma diluted in vitro with different fluids (isotonic saline, hydroxyethyl starch, and human albumin) using an antigen determination, three photo-optical Clauss methods, one mechanical Clauss method, a prothrombin-derived method, and viscoelastic measurement through ROTEM [92]. The fibrinogen levels were overestimated using the photo-optical Clauss methods as a result of the dilution with hydroxyethyl starch, whereas ROTEM FIBTEM MCF was reduced by the dilution and to a lesser extent by human albumin. The former was ascribed to an unexplained interference with the optical source by hydroxyethyl starch and the latter was due to impairment of fibrin polymerization induced by the fluid. In addition, the fibrinogen measurement by the Clauss method for the same set of plasma samples can vary within and between laboratories [94].

On the other hand, it was found that plasma fibrinogen level (FLEV) estimated by FF TEG was on average 1.0 g/L higher than that determined by the Clauss method in both surgical patients and healthy controls [95]. This is consistent with other reports of higher TEG FLEV values than the Clauss values in cardiac surgery [39] and overestimation of plasma fibrinogen level in liver transplantation when the plasma fibrinogen level becomes less than 1 g/L [42].

In our subgroup analysis of trauma patients who received fibrinogen concentrate versus placebo (i.e., normal saline), the correlation coefficients are not as significantly altered between the two groups (0.68 versus 0.67 for FF TEG and 0.88 versus 0.82 for ROTEM FIBTEM). This is in contrast with patients undergoing liver transplantation [42, 54] and cardiac surgery [52, 91] where the correlation was impaired by severe hypofibrinogenemia and fibrinogen replacement. Specifically, the correlations between FIBTEM MCF and Clauss fibrinogen concentration decreased from r=0.71-0.82 to 0.33-0.59 after administration of fibrinogen concentrate in patients undergoing complex cardiovascular surgery [91]. In addition, hyperfibrinogenemia (>4 g/L) could impair the correlation between ROTEM FIBTEM MCF and fibrinogen levels as reported in major upper gastrointestinal surgery [96]. Therefore, the discrepancy may be due to the differences in the range of plasma fibrinogen concentrations among these studies (e.g., interquartile range of 1.88-3.63 g/L in our study vs. 0.77-1.38 g/L in the liver transplantation study). Similar correlations were reported between FIBTEM clot amplitude and fibrinogen concentration (r=0.86) at admission and then decreased correlations (r=0.43 and 0.63) after admission in the trauma patients receiving fibrinogen concentrate [44].

It should be noted that the concentration measurements by the Clauss method and other plasma fibrinogen assays cannot be the same as the clot strength of whole blood measured by TEG and ROTEM. Apparently, fibrinogen is not the only contributor to clot amplitude in these FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM assays, which may impose some limitations on FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM for the assessment of fibrinogen deficiency. Activated FXIII and hematocrit could have an impact on clot firmness as well and affect the correlations [49, 96–99]. Postoperative FXIII levels correlated to FIBTEM MCF more significantly than fibrinogen levels in patients undergoing major upper gastrointestinal surgery [96]. However, the same study also showed a significant correlation between platelet count and ROTEM FIBTEM MCF (r=0.55), which implied that the test might be profoundly impaired by incomplete inhibition of the platelet contribution to the clot strength. Furthermore, FXIII levels might affect FF TEG as well [98].

In addition, Ogawa et al. reported a higher correlation between ROTEM FIBTEM MCF and Clauss plasma fibrinogen at lower hematocrit (<25%) than at higher hematocrit (>30%) (r =0.88 and 0.67, resp.) in cardiac surgery [99]. In contrast, Solomon et al. found no significant differences between the lowest haematocrit group (<25%) and the higher haematocrit groups (25-27.9%, 28-29.9%, and >30%) for FIBTEM MCF or fibrinogen concentrations in whole blood and plasma, and thus the hematocrit effect appeared to be negligible [49]. FF TEG has shown hypocoagulable states in patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease mainly due to impaired fibrinogen function negatively affected by elevated haematocrit [100].

In addition to MA, other TEG parameters, e.g., estimated functional fibrinogen level (FLEV) and kinetic time K and Alpha, kaolin TEG K and Alpha, have shown different extents of correlations with fibrinogen concentration [32, 33, 47]. Kornblith et al. confirmed a significant correlation between FF TEG FLEV and the Clauss fibrinogen assay in trauma patients in agreement with the published findings from Harr et al., but the correlation as assessed by linear regression was weaker (R²= 0.57 vs. 0.87) [32, 33]. In addition, different correlations of FLEV with kaolin TEG MA (R²= 0.44-0.64 vs. 0.80), K (R²= 0.01 vs. 0.35), and Alpha (R²= 0.03 vs. 0.70) were reported in their studies likely due to different statistical methods (linear vs. polynomial regression). The correlations were affected by fibrinogen concentration, decreases at low and high ranges [32]. FF TEG FLEV was diminished and negatively correlated to haematocrit [100].

We observed moderate correlations of Clauss fibrinogen concentration with FF TEG K and Alpha (Spearman’s correlation ρ=-0.46 and 0.40) and with ROTEM FIBTEM CFT and Alpha (ρ=-0.41 and 0.54) in trauma patients [30]. Furthermore, there were weak correlations of fibrinogen concentration with ROTEM FIBTEM CT (ρ=-0.29), and with FF TEG CL30 and ROTEM FIBTEM LI30 (ρ=0.21 and 0.20). The correlations between K/CFT, Alpha and fibrinogen concentration are consistent with their measurement of the activity of clotting factors, in particular fibrinogen [101], and are comparable with or stronger than the reported correlations between FF TEG K/Alpha and fibrinogen concentration [32, 33]. A linear correlation was observed between the clot shear elasticity G calculated from FF TEG MA and functional fibrinogen levels measured by the Clauss method in both whole blood (R²=0.605) and platelet-poor plasma (R²=0.94) [102].

Among all the parameters, the strongest correlations between FF TEG MA/ROTEM FIBTEM MCF and plasma fibrinogen concentration have been reported [32, 33, 103], suggesting these parameters are most useful for monitoring the role of fibrinogen in hemostasis of bleeding patients.

Together with kaolin TEG, FF TEG has been used to characterize functional fibrinogen to platelet ratio and was found useful in preoperatively identifying thrombotic complication in patients undergoing microvascular free tissue transfer in head and neck surgery [104]. FF TEG MA correlated with a number of biomarkers of endothelial activation and damages such as syndecan-1, thrombomodulin and protein C, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (r=-0.37, p<0.001) in patients with severe sepsis [105].

5. Diagnosis of Coagulopathy/Hypofibrinogenemia and Prediction of Blood Transfusion

Table 2 summarizes the predictive accuracy of FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM in various clinical settings. MA and MCF are the main parameters used for the predictions of hypofibrinogenemia and blood transfusions. The prediction accuracy was evaluated by sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and variate regression analyses. Different cut-off values of fibrinogen concentrations ranging from 1 to 1.8 g/L were used to define hypofibrinogenemia. Traditionally, a plasma fibrinogen level of 1 g/L was established for fibrinogen replacement in patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency, whereas the threshold varied from 0.8 to 2.0 g/L in patients with acquired fibrinogen deficiency [14]. In contrast, a critical fibrinogen concentration of 2.29 g/L was identified in trauma below which a significant increase in mortality occurred [106]. The discrepancy implies that the negative impact of fibrinogen deficiency in trauma may have been underestimated. It should also be noted that hypofibrinogenemia prevalence in major bleeding varies across clinical contexts [107].

Most clinical studies are prospective observational, while a few are retrospective and randomized controlled. Sample size ranged from 23 to 1077 patients. In contrast with ROTEM, FF TEG has been used less to detect hypofibrinogenemia and predict blood transfusion requirements with a focus on trauma patients. Among various clinical settings, ROTEM FIBTEM has been mostly used in trauma, cardiac surgery, and liver transplantation with best predictive power for hypofibrinogenemia (fibrinogen <1.5 g/L) (AUC=0.99) in cardiac surgery [47]. Furthermore, several studies have shown that FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM could predict bleeding and transfusion requirements in trauma [63, 64], cardiac surgery [52], and liver transplantation [58, 66] with various accuracies. It appeared that ROTEM would have better predictive accuracy than TEG because it has greater specificity for some common coagulopathies in cardiac surgery, such as fibrinogen deficiency. The averaged likelihood ratio of FF TEG MA for diagnosis of hypofibrinogenemia is 4.71±2.18 based on a number of studies [30, 35, 40], while the corresponding value of ROTEM FIBTEM MCF is 9.24±2.64 calculated from the literature [30, 35, 55].

Two studies evaluated ROTEM devices in patients with postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). One study provided data on the ability of ROTEM FIBTEM to predict hypofibrinogenemia (<1.5 g/L) [59]; the other evaluated the predictive power of ROTEM FIBTEM and Clauss fibrinogen for PPH and found no associations between the prepartum coagulation parameters and blood loss defined as blood loss ≥ 500 mL [67]. Alternatively, one study showed that FF TEG MA with a cut-off value of 12.1 mm could predict obstetric complications in nonpregnant dysfibrinogenemia patients with a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 69.2%, and AUC of 0.923, but could not distinguish patients with bleeding and nonbleeding symptoms [108].

Only a few studies demonstrated ROTEM FIBTEM provided faster and better prediction than plasma fibrinogen concentration for massive transfusion [64] and bleeding [66], respectively. ROTEM FIBTEM provided early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma similar to the most predictive laboratory parameters (e.g., fibrinogen and hemoglobin concentrations) [64]. A separate study comparing standard fibrinogen measurement methods (i.e., Clauss method and thrombin clotting time) with ROTEM FIBTEM in patients with cirrhosis suggested FIBTEM as a promising alternative to standard plasma fibrinogen measurement in cirrhotic patients, especially in evaluating fibrin polymerization disorders in these patients [62].

There is insufficient evidence or low-quality evidence for the benefits of TEG and ROTEM for the prediction of bleeding and adverse outcomes beyond that achieved using routinely measured baseline factors or conventional coagulation tests (CCTs) except for rapidity. ROTEM EXTEM and FIBTEM were no better than routine laboratory tests for detecting differences between surviving and nonsurviving critically ill patients [109]. ROTEM FIBTEM was unable to predict PPH and not superior to CCTs in a prospective observational study of 217 healthy pregnant women [67]. On the other hand, ROTEM FIBTEM was not a good test to predict the presence of acute coagulopathy of trauma defined as an international normalized ratio (INR) > 1.3 or a fibrinogen level < 1.5 g/L unless combined with EXTEM, and either of the tests could predict the need for emergent blood product transfusions (defined as ≥5 units of red blood cells (RBC) and ≥3 units of plasma within the first 24 h of care) [65]. The use of CCTs such as INR in trauma has been severely criticized due to the lack of association with bleeding and blood transfusion. It has been reported that INR overestimated coagulopathy should not be used to guide blood transfusion in stable trauma and surgical patients [110].

Finally, if fibrinogen deficiency has a causal relationship with bleeding and adverse clinical outcomes, it is sensible to suggest that TEG and ROTEM functional fibrinogen tests that improve clinical prediction for fibrinogen-related bleeding may also have the potential to predict adverse clinical outcomes. However, randomized trials are needed to provide high-quality evidence for the role of TEG and ROTEM in diagnosis, management, and monitoring of fibrinogen function and replacement in bleeding patients.

It is noteworthy that recently two large randomized trials, CRASH-2 (Clinical Randomisation of an Antifibrinolytic in Significant Haemorrhage 2) [111] and WOMAN (World Maternal Antifibrinolytic) [112], provide high-quality evidence for the early use of tranexamic acid for a survival advantage to many bleeding patients. An in vitro study showed that the antifibrinolytic reduced fibrinogenolysis in addition to the correction of fibrinolytic effects on TEG (MA, LY) values in the presence of tissue plasminogen activator [113].

6. Comparison between TEG and ROTEM for Functional Fibrinogen Assays

A number of studies compared the reagents and devices between FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM. Solomon et al. showed that FF TEG MA was larger than FIBTEM MCF when performed with either their standard assay reagents (lyophilized tissue factor and abciximab on TEG and a combination of ex-tem and fib-tem on ROTEM) or the same assay reagent [71]. In addition, the FF TEG reagent produced higher values than the FIBTEM reagent on both TEG and ROTEM. Schlimp et al. compared different fibrinogen assays in eliminating platelet effects on TEG MA and ROTEM MCF. It was found that abciximab based on glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition was less effective at inhibiting the platelet contribution to clot strength than cytochalasin D based on prevention of platelet cytoskeletal reorganization, resulting in larger FF TEG MA compared to ROTEM FIBTEM MCF and affecting their correlations and changes with fibrinogen concentration. In addition, the combination of both inhibitions provided the most accurate assessment of the clot strength and fibrinogen function [114]. It has been speculated that the ROTEM FIBTEM reagent might contain stabilizing agents (e.g., dimethyl sulfoxide) and more tissue factors than the FF TEG reagent [115]. These results are consistent with other studies comparing TEG and ROTEM functional fibrinogen assays for whole blood from surgical patients [48, 116], trauma patients, and healthy volunteers [91, 114].

However, the differences between FF TEG MA and ROTEM FIBTEM MCF obtained using the same reagents [71, 115] imply that TEG system itself may also be a contributing factor. The hardware differences between the two systems include the mechanisms for cup/pin rotation, detection of the rotation, cup materials, and interior surface properties [117, 118].

Meyer et al. compared different TEG and ROTEM tests including FF TEG and FIBTEM, and Clauss method for detection of trauma-induced coagulopathy and goal-directed transfusion therapy [34]. Specifically, FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM early amplitudes (A5, 10) and MA/MCF had similar correlations with Clauss fibrinogen level and could differentiate coagulopathic and transfused patients from noncoagulopathic and nontransfused patients.

Prüller et al. compared fibrinogen assays using FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM in surgical patients in terms of their MA and MCF values, and correlations with Clauss fibrinogen level [116]. It was found that FF TEG MA was higher than ROTEM FIBTEM MCF and their MA and MCF corresponded to different Clauss fibrinogen levels. The FF TEG MA showed a weaker correlation with Clauss fibrinogen than ROTEM FIBTEM MCF (R²=0.542 vs. 0.671).

Different TEG (Rapid, Kaolin, and FF) and ROTEM tests (EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM) were compared for their sensitivity to detect fibrinolysis induced by tissue plasminogen activator in whole blood [119]. Compared to other tests, FF TEG and ROTEM FIBREM provided more rapid detection of fibrinolysis, but FF TEG detected changes in clot strength as well. Comparison of tissue factor-triggered ROTEM FIBTEM and EXTEM with contact-activated kaolin TEG in patients undergoing liver transplantation showed the highest and lowest hyperfibrinolysis detection rates by FIBTEM and kaolin TEG, respectively, suggesting the effects of coagulation activators and platelet inhibitors on sensitivity to identifying hyperfibrinolysis [120].

In contrast with hyperfibrinolysis detection, we found only kaolin TEG and ROTEM EXTEM as the methods of measuring hypofibrinolysis (also called fibrinolysis shutdown) instead of FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM. In one study of 914 trauma patients (ISS≥15), the threshold for hypofibrinolysis was determined for EXTEM ML at 5.5% with a sensitivity of 61.6% and specificity of 58.4% [121]. The study reported 29.9% hypofibrinolysis. In another study of 550 severe trauma patients with a median ISS of 19, EXTEM ML<3.5% was selected to define hypofibrinolysis with a sensitivity 42.5% and specificity 76.5% [122]. The method identified 25.6% hypofibrinolysis. A number of studies have used TEG in particular kaolin TEG LY30<0.81% to detect hypofibrinolysis in trauma patients with a median ISS of 25 [123, 124]. These studies reported fibrinolysis phenotypes with different prevalence: hypofibrinolysis at 29.9%, 25.6%, and 46%; physiologic fibrinolysis at 63.0%, 70.7%, and 36%. The ROTEM method indicated physiologic fibrinolysis as the predominant phenotype with 63% [121] and 71% [122] followed by hypofibrinolysis, while the TEG method showed hypofibrinolysis as the most common phenotype with 46% followed by physiologic fibrinolysis with 36% [124]. The discrepancy could be the difference in patients’ characteristics (e.g., ISS) and the method itself (tissue factor-activated ROTEM EXTEM vs. contact-activated kaolin TEG). A recent retrospective analysis of the Pragmatic, Randomized Optimal Platelet and Plasma Ratios (PROPPR) trial found 61% of hypofibrinolytic patients as determined by kaolin TEG LY30<0.9%, followed by 22% of hyperfibrinolytic patients based on LY30≥3% [125]. The study also suggested that hypofibrinolysis did not reflect shutdown of enzymatic fibrinolysis with hypercoagulability, but rather a type of coagulopathy characterized by fibrinolytic activation with concurrent fibrinogen consumption and platelet dysfunction.

There is a lack of studies to compare the utilities of TEG and ROTEM for diagnosis of coagulopathy, prediction of mortality, and the requirement for massive transfusion, although both have been reported useful [45, 126]. We conducted a comparative study of functional fibrinogen assays using TEG and ROTEM in trauma patients [30] to determine (1) their interchangeability of the key parameter values obtained by the two systems in all trauma patients as well as severe trauma patients randomized to receive their fibrinogen concentrate or placebo (normal saline), and (2) utility of each system for predicting clinical outcomes and monitoring any changes in coagulation profiles in the trauma patients randomized for treatment with fibrinogen concentrate or placebo. In addition, a crossover analysis (ex-tem and fib-tem on TEG) was conducted to confirm whether the assay reagents or the device could contribute to the observed differences. Overall, we found that TEG and ROTEM parameter values were correlated, being strongest between MA and MCF, but were significantly different, and their agreement fell outside acceptable limits and thus their values were not interchangeable, arguably due to differences in both devices and assay reagents used. Specifically, ROTEM FIBTEM MCF had a higher correlation with Clauss fibrinogen (ρ=0.87 vs. 0.75) and lower value than FF TEG MA (17.1±8.0 mm vs. 22.4±7.5 mm). Clinically, TEG MA and ROTEM MCF showed reasonable predictive accuracy for plasma transfusion, but poor accuracy for any red blood cells and cryoprecipitate transfusions. Both well predicted hypofibrinogenemia (fibrinogen concentration < 1 g/L) with AUC of 0.95 and 0.96. ROTEM FIBTEM MCF seems to be more consistent with the duration of the between-group difference as indicated by fibrinogen levels than FF TEG MA. In addition, ROTEM FIBTEM detected changes in coagulation time (CT) and clot lysis (LI30) over hospitalization time as a result of fibrinogen treatment.

In a study similar to ours, TEG and ROTEM were compared for functional fibrinogen assays in trauma to determine specific cut-offs of TEG MA and ROTEM MCF for an increased risk of receiving a transfusion [35]. It was found that FF TEG MA and ROTEM FIBTEM MCF correlated well (ρ=0.71, p<0.001) and had the same correlation coefficient with Clauss fibrinogen level (ρ=0.64, p<0.001). Figure 2 shows a strong correlation between FF TEG MA and ROTEM FIBTEM MCF (r=0.77, p<0.001) based on the pooled data of our study [30] and Meyer et al. [35], but a larger FF TEG MA than ROTEM FIBTEM MCF on average (20.63±7.11 mm vs. 16.23±7.73 mm, n=363, p<0.001).

7. Conclusions

TEG and ROTEM functional fibrinogen tests play important roles in diagnosis of fibrinogen-related coagulopathy and transfusion requirements including fibrinogen replacement. The clot strength of FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM is the most used parameter for discrimination of fibrinogen deficiencies and their correlations with Clauss fibrinogen levels are varied depending on patient population and range of fibrinogen concentrations. When using FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM to diagnose fibrinogen deficiency and predict transfusion requirements other variables such as hematocrits, factor XIII levels and fibrinogen concentrate ranges should be taken into consideration. Both TEG and ROTEM have been used to detect systemic fibrinolysis (physiologic, hypo, and hyperfibrinolysis). Studies comparing FF TEG and ROTEM FIBTEM suggest a stronger correlation of the latter with plasma fibrinogen concentration, likely due to its more effective elimination of platelet contribution to clot strength. We should be aware that the studies supporting the use TEG and ROTEM are limited for trauma and surgical bleeding patients. Even without robust clinical data, TEG and ROTEM are likely to remain popular for the hemostatic management of bleeding patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

References

J. H. Levy, F. Szlam, K. A. Tanaka, and R. M. Sniecienski, “Fibrinogen and hemostasis: A primary hemostatic target for the management of acquired bleeding,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 114, no. 2, pp. 261–274, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Fries and W. Z. Martini, “Role of fibrinogen in trauma-induced coagulopathy,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 116–121, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Rourke, N. Curry, S. Khan et al., “Fibrinogen levels during trauma hemorrhage, response to replacement therapy, and association with patient outcomes,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 10, no. 7, pp. 1342–1351, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kimura, S. Kimura, S. Sumita, and M. Yamakage, “Predictors of hypofibrinogenemia in blunt trauma patients on admission,” Journal of Anesthesia & Clinical Research, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 242–248, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Inaba, E. Karamanos, T. Lustenberger et al., “Impact of fibrinogen levels on outcomes after acute injury in patients requiring a massive transfusion,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 216, no. 2, pp. 290–297, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. K. McQuilten, E. M. Wood, M. Bailey, P. A. Cameron, and D. J. Cooper, “Fibrinogen is an independent predictor of mortality in major trauma patients: A five-year statewide cohort study,” Injury, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1074–1081, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Whiting and J. A. Dinardo, “TEG and ROTEM: technology and clinical applications,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 228–232, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Schlimp and H. Schöchl, “The role of fibrinogen in trauma-induced coagulopathy,” Hämostaseologie, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 29–39, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Figueiredo, A. Tantot, and J. Duranteau, “Targeting blood products transfusion in trauma: What is the role of thromboelastography?” Minerva Anestesiologica, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 1214–1229, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Görlinger, L. Shore-Lesserson, D. Dirkmann, A. A. Hanke, N. Rahe-Meyer, and K. A. Tanaka, “Management of hemorrhage in cardiothoracic surgery,” Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. S20–S34, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Goerlinger, “Coagulation management during liver transplantation,” Hämostaseologie, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. S64–S75, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Ranucci, B. Martinez, D. Colella, and D. Haxhiademi, Point-of-care tests for severe hemorrhage: A manual for diagnosis and treatment, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
D. Spahn, G. Spahn, and P. Stein, “Indications and Risks of Fibrinogen in Surgery and Trauma,” Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostasis, vol. 42, no. 02, pp. 147–154, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Levy, I. Welsby, and L. T. Goodnough, “Fibrinogen as a therapeutic target for bleeding: A review of critical levels and replacement therapy,” Transfusion, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 1389–1405, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. H. Levy and L. T. Goodnough, “How I use fibrinogen replacement therapy in acquired bleeding,” Blood, vol. 125, no. 9, pp. 1387–1393, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Stensballe, S. R. Ostrowski, and P. I. Johansson, “Viscoelastic guidance of resuscitation,” Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 212–218, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Wikkelsø, J. Wetterslev, A. M. Møller, and A. Afshari, “Thromboelastography (TEG) or rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to monitor haemostatic treatment in bleeding patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis,” Anaesthesia, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 519–531, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fahrendorff, R. S. Oliveri, and P. I. Johansson, “The use of viscoelastic haemostatic assays in goal-directing treatment with allogeneic blood products - A systematic review and meta-analysis,” Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine , vol. 25, no. 1, article no. 39, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Gonzalez, E. E. Moore, H. B. Moore et al., “Goal-directed hemostatic resuscitation of trauma-induced coagulopathy a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing a viscoelastic assay to conventional coagulation assays,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 263, no. 6, pp. 1051–1059, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. F. Serraino and G. J. Murphy, “Routine use of viscoelastic blood tests for diagnosis and treatment of coagulopathic bleeding in cardiac surgery: Updated systematic review and meta-analysis,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 823–833, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Whiting, M. Al, M. Westwood et al., “Viscoelastic point-of-care testing to assist with the diagnosis, management and monitoring of haemostasis: A systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis,” Health Technology Assessment, vol. 19, no. 58, pp. 1–228, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sankarankutty, B. Nascimento, L. T. da Luz, and S. Rizoli, “TEG® and ROTEM® in trauma: Similar test but different results?” World Journal of Emergency Surgery, vol. 7, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Coakley, K. Reddy, I. Mackie, and S. Mallett, “Transfusion Triggers in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation: A Comparison of the Thromboelastometry Analyzer, the Thromboelastogram, and Conventional Coagulation Tests,” Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 548–553, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Rizoli, A. Min, A. P. Sanchez et al., “In trauma, conventional ROTEM and TEG results are not interchangeable but are similar in clinical applicability,” Military Medicine, vol. 181, no. 5, pp. 117–126, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Schäfer, A. Driessen, U. Bauerfeind et al., “In vitro effects of different sources of fibrinogen supplementation on clot initiation and stability in a model of dilutional coagulopathy,” Transfusion Medicine, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 373–380, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mittermayr, W. Streif, T. Haas et al., “Hemostatic changes after crystalloid or colloid fluid administration during major orthopedic surgery: The role of fibrinogen administration,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 905–917, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Durila, P. Lukáš, M. Astraverkhava, and T. Vymazal, “Evaluation of fibrinogen concentrates and prothrombin complex concentrates on coagulation changes in a hypothermic in vitro model using thromboelastometry and thromboelastography,” Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 407–414, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Schenk, A. K. Lindner, B. Treichl et al., “Fibrinogen supplementation ex vivo increasesclot firmness comparable to platelet transfusion in thrombocytopenia,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 576–582, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. T. Da Luz, B. Nascimento, A. K. Shankarakutty, S. Rizoli, and N. K. J. Adhikari, “Effect of thromboelastography (TEG®) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) on diagnosis of coagulopathy, transfusion guidance and mortality in trauma: Descriptive systematic review,” Critical Care, vol. 18, no. 5, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
H. T. Peng, B. Nascimento, and H. Tien, “A comparative analysis of functional fibrinogen assays using teg and rotem in trauma patients enrolled in the fiirst trial,” Panamerican Journal of Trauma, Critical Care & Emergency Surgery, vol. 7, pp. 143–157, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Nascimento, J. Callum, H. Tien et al., “Fibrinogen in the initial resuscitation of severe trauma (FiiRST): a randomized feasibility trial,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 117, no. 6, pp. 775–782, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Harr, E. E. Moore, A. Ghasabyan et al., “Functional fibrinogen assay indicates that fibrinogen is critical in correcting abnormal clot strength following trauma,” Shock, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Z. Kornblith, M. E. Kutcher, B. J. Redick, C. S. Calfee, R. F. Vilardi, and M. J. Cohen, “Fibrinogen and platelet contributions to clot formation: Implications for trauma resuscitation and thromboprophylaxis,” Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 255–263, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. P. Meyer, M. A. S. Meyer, A. M. Sørensen et al., “Thrombelastography and rotational thromboelastometry early amplitudes in 182 trauma patients with clinical suspicion of severe injury,” Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 76, pp. 682–690, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. S. Meyer, S. R. Ostrowski, A. M. Sørensen et al., “Fibrinogen in trauma, an evaluation of thrombelastography and rotational thromboelastometry fibrinogen assays,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. 581–590, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Fluger, K. Maderova, M. Simek, R. Hajek, J. Zapletalova, and V. Lonsky, “Comparison of functional fibrinogen assessment using thromboelastography with the standard von clauss method,” Biomedical Papers, vol. 156, no. 3, pp. 260-261, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Agarwal, R. I. Johnson, and M. Shaw, “A comparison of fibrinogen measurement using TEG® functional fibrinogen and Clauss in cardiac surgery patients,” International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 459–465, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Fluger, K. Maderová, M. Šimek, R. Hájek, J. Zapletalová, and V. Lonský, “The effect of a cardiopulmonary bypass system with biocompatible coating on fibrinogen levels determined by the TEG-functional fibrinogen method: Preliminary results,” Perfusion, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 503–509, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Fabbro, J. T. Gutsche, T. A. Miano, J. G. Augoustides, and P. A. Patel, “Comparison of Thrombelastography-Derived Fibrinogen Values at Rewarming and Following Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Cardiac Surgery Patients,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 123, no. 3, pp. 570–577, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. K. Gautam, C. Cai, O. Pawelek, M. B. Rafique, D. Cattano, and E. G. Pivalizza, “Performance of functional fibrinogen thromboelastography in children undergoing congenital heart surgery,” Pediatric Anesthesia, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 181–189, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Kim, H. S. Shim, W. H. Kim et al., “Predictive Value of Intraoperative Thromboelastometry for the Risk of Perioperative Excessive Blood Loss in Infants and Children Undergoing Congenital Cardiac Surgery,” Survey of Anesthesiology, vol. 61, no. 1, p. 17, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Yang Lu, K. A. Tanaka, E. Abuelkasem, R. M. Planinsic, and T. Sakai, “Clinical applicability of rapid thrombelastography and functional fibrinogen thrombelastography to adult liver transplantation,” Liver Transplantation, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 1097–1105, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. N. R. Gottumukkala, S. K. Sharma, and J. Philip, “Assessing platelet and fibrinogen contribution to clot strength using modified thromboelastography in pregnant women,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1453–1455, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
J.-S. David, M. Durand, A. Levrat et al., “Correlation between laboratory coagulation testing and thromboelastometry is modified during management of trauma patients,” Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. 319–327, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Rugeri, A. Levrat, J. S. David et al., “Diagnosis of early coagulation abnormalities in trauma patients by rotation thrombelastography,” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 289–295, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tauber, P. Innerhofer, R. Breitkopf et al., “Prevalence and impact of abnormal ROTEM® assays in severe blunt trauma: Results of the 'Diagnosis and Treatment of Trauma-Induced Coagulopathy (DIA-TRE-TIC) study',” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 378–387, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Bhardwaj, P. Malhotra, S. Hasija, U. K. Chowdury, and N. Pangasa, “Coagulopathies in cyanotic cardiac patients: An analysis with three point - Of - care testing devices (Thromboelastography, rotational thromboelastometry, and sonoclot analyzer),” Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 212–218, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Solomon, E. Baryshnikova, C. J. Schlimp, H. Schöchl, L. M. Asmis, and M. Ranucci, “Fibtem plus provides an improved thromboelastometry test for measurement of fibrin-based clot quality in cardiac surgery patients,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 1054–1062, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Solomon, N. Rahe-Meyer, H. Schöchl, M. Ranucci, and K. Görlinger, “Effect of haematocrit on fibrin-based clot firmness in the FIBTEM test,” Blood Transfusion, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 412–418, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Espinosa, R. Stenseth, V. Videm, and H. Pleym, “Comparison of three point-of-care testing devices to detect hemostatic changes in adult elective cardiac surgery: A prospective observational study,” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 14, no. 1, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
H. S. Mace, N. Lightfoot, S. McCluskey et al., “Validity of Thromboelastometry for Rapid Assessment of Fibrinogen Levels in Heparinized Samples during Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective, Single-center, Observational Study,” Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 90–95, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ranucci and E. Baryshnikova, “Fibrinogen supplementation after cardiac surgery: Insights from the Zero-Plasma trial (ZEPLAST),” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 116, no. 5, pp. 618–623, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Erdoes, G. Gerster, G. Colucci, H. Kaiser, L. Alberio, and B. Eberle, “Prediction of post-weaning fibrinogen status during cardiopulmonary bypass: An observational study in 110 patients,” PLoS ONE, vol. 10, no. 5, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Seo, J.-H. Choi, Y.-J. Moon, and S.-M. Jeong, “FIBTEM of thromboelastometry does not accurately represent fibrinogen concentration in patients with severe hypofibrinogenemia during liver transplantation,” Annals of Transplantation, vol. 20, pp. 342–350, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-M. Jeong, J.-G. Song, H. Seo, J.-H. Choi, D.-M. Jang, and G.-S. Hwang, “Quantification of Both Platelet Count and Fibrinogen Concentration Using Maximal Clot Firmness of Thromboelastometry during Liver Transplantation,” Transplantation Proceedings, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 1890–1895, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Blasi, J. Beltran, A. Pereira et al., “An assessment of thromboelastometry to monitor blood coagulation and guide transfusion support in liver transplantation,” Transfusion, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1989–1998, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Roullet, J. Pillot, G. Freyburger et al., “Rotation thromboelastometry detects thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenaemia during orthotopic liver transplantation,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 422–428, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-G. Song, S.-M. Jeong, I.-G. Jun, H.-M. Lee, and G.-S. Hwang, “Five-minute parameter of thromboelastometry is sufficient to detect thrombocytopenia and hypofibrinogenaemia in patients undergoing liver transplantation,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 112, no. 2, pp. 290–297, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huissoud, N. Carrabin, F. Audibert et al., “Bedside assessment of fibrinogen level in postpartum haemorrhage by thrombelastometry,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 116, no. 8, pp. 1097–1102, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Ellenberger, N. Garofano, G. Barcelos, J. Diaper, G. Pavlovic, and M. Licker, “Assessment of Haemostasis in patients undergoing emergent neurosurgery by rotational Elastometry and standard coagulation tests: a prospective observational study,” BMC Anesthesiology, vol. 17, no. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Schaden, D. Hoerburger, S. Hacker, P. Kraincuk, D. M. Baron, and S. Kozek-Langenecker, “Fibrinogen function after severe burn injury,” Burns, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 77–82, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Vucelic, R. Jesic, S. Jovicic et al., “Comparison of standard fibrinogen measurement methods with fibrin clot firmness assessed by thromboelastometry in patients with cirrhosis,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 135, no. 6, pp. 1124–1130, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. I. Johansson, A. M. Sørensen, C. F. Larsen et al., “Low hemorrhage-related mortality in trauma patients in a Level i trauma center employing transfusion packages and early thromboelastography-directed hemostatic resuscitation with plasma and platelets,” Transfusion, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 3088–3099, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Schöchl, B. Cotton, K. Inaba et al., “FIBTEM provides early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma,” Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 6, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
M. L. Tonglet, J.-L. Poplavsky, L. Seidel, J. M. Minon, V. D’Orio, and A. Ghuysen, “Thromboelastometry in trauma care: a place in the 2018 Belgian health care system?” Acta Clinica Belgica: International Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Medicine, pp. 1–7, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
T. M. Dötsch, D. Dirkmann, D. Bezinover et al., “Assessment of standard laboratory tests and rotational thromboelastometry for the prediction of postoperative bleeding in liver transplantation,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 402–410, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Kaufner, A. Henkelmann, C. Von Heymann et al., “Can prepartum thromboelastometry-derived parameters and fibrinogen levels really predict postpartum hemorrhage?” Journal of Perinatal Medicine, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 427–435, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Schöchl, W. Voelckel, A. Grassetto, and C. J. Schlimp, “Practical application of point-of-care coagulation testing to guide treatment decisions in trauma,” Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 1587–1598, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Schobersberger, D. Fries, M. Mittermayr et al., “Changes of biochemical markers and functional tests for clot formation during long-haul flights,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 108, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Anderson, I. Quasim, M. Steven et al., “Interoperator and intraoperator variability of whole blood coagulation assays: A comparison of thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry,” Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1550–1557, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Solomon, B. Sørensen, G. Hochleitner, J. Kashuk, M. Ranucci, and H. Schöchl, “Comparison of whole blood fibrin-based clot tests in thrombelastography and thromboelastometry,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 721–730, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Rahe-Meyer, C. Solomon, M. Vorweg et al., “Multicentric comparison of single portion reagents and liquid reagents for thromboelastometry,” Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 218–222, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. A. Gurbel, K. P. Bliden, U. S. Tantry et al., “First report of the point-of-care TEG: A technical validation study of the TEG-6S system,” Platelets, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 642–649, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Dias, E. I. Haney, B. A. Mathew, C. G. Lopez-Espina, A. W. Orr, and M. A. Popovsky, “New-Generation Thromboelastography: Comprehensive Evaluation of Citrated and Heparinized Blood Sample Storage Effect on Clot-Forming Variables,” Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, vol. 141, no. 4, pp. 569–577, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Görlinger, J. Iqbal, D. Dirkmann, and K. A. Tanaka, “Whole blood assay: Thromboelastometry,” Management of Bleeding Patients, pp. 37–64, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Grimes and K. F. Schulz, “Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios,” The Lancet, vol. 365, no. 9469, pp. 1500–1505, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. G. Nielsen, B. M. Cohen, and E. Cohen, “Effects of coagulation factor deficiency on plasma coagulation kinetics determined via thrombelastography®: Critical roles of fibrinogen and factors II, VII, X and XII,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 222–231, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. G. Nielsen, “Colloids decrease clot propagation and strength: Role of factor XIII-fibrin polymer and thrombin-fibrinogen interactions,” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1163–1171, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Fries, P. Innerhofer, C. Reif et al., “The effect of fibrinogen substitution on reversal of dilutional coagulopathy: An in vitro model,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 347–351, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Fries, A. Krismer, A. Klingler et al., “Effect of fibrinogen on reversal of dilutional coagulopathy: A porcine model,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 172–177, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Fenger-Eriksen, E. Anker-Møller, J. Heslop, J. Ingerslev, and B. Sørensen, “Thrombelastographic whole blood clot formation after ex vivo addition of plasma substitutes: Improvements of the induced coagulopathy with fibrinogen concentrate,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 324–329, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Görlinger, D. Dirkmann, C. Solomon, and A. A. Hanke, “Fast interpretation of thromboelastometry in non-cardiac surgery: Reliability in patients with hypo-, normo-, and hypercoagulability,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 222–230, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Kalina, H.-A. Stöhr, H. Bickhard et al., “Rotational thromboelastography for monitoring of fibrinogen concentrate therapy in fibrinogen deficiency,” Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 777–783, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. J. Mackie, A. S. Lawrie, S. Kitchen et al., “A performance evaluation of commercial fibrinogen reference preparations and assays for clauss and PT-derived fibrinogen,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 997–1005, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Koh, C. Y. Chew, O. A. Viegas, M. Choo, and S. S. Ratnam, “Influence of circulating D-dimer levels on assays of fibrinogen,” ANNALS Academy of Medicine Singapore, vol. 23, pp. 856–860, 1994.
View at: Google Scholar
L. M. Asmis, “Coagulation factor concentrates,” in Perioperative hemostasis: Coagulation for anesthesiologists, C. E. Marcucci and P. Schoettker, Eds., pp. 177–204, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Schöchl, W. Voelckel, and C. Solomon, “Detection and impact of hyperfibrinolysis in trauma,” Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, vol. 122, no. 5, pp. S11–S13, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Gertler, G. Wiesner, P. Tassani-Prell, S.-L. Braun, and K. Martin, “Are the point-of-care diagnostics MULTIPLATE and ROTEM valid in the setting of high concentrations of heparin and its reversal with protamine?” Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 981–986, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. S. Romlin, H. Wåhlander, M. Synnergren, F. Baghaei, and A. Jeppsson, “Earlier detection of coagulopathy with thromboelastometry during pediatric cardiac surgery: A prospective observational study,” Pediatric Anesthesia, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 222–227, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. H. P. Van Den Besselaar, C. J. J. Van Rijn, C. M. Cobbaert et al., “Fibrinogen determination according to Clauss: Commutability assessment of International and commercial standards and quality control samples,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 55, no. 11, pp. 1761–1769, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Solomon, J. Cadamuro, B. Ziegler et al., “A comparison of fibrinogen measurement methods with fibrin clot elasticity assessed by thromboelastometry, before and after administration of fibrinogen concentrate in cardiac surgery patients,” Transfusion, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1695–1706, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Fenger-Eriksen, G. W. Moore, S. Rangarajan, J. Ingerslev, and B. Sørensen, “Fibrinogen estimates are influenced by methods of measurement and hemodilution with colloid plasma expanders,” Transfusion, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2571–2576, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Winstedt, C. Solomon, A. Hillarp, T. Lundahl, and U. Schött, “Intraoperative Hydroxyethyl Starch and its Effects on Different Fibrinogen Measurements,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 641–647, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Solomon, E. Baryshnikova, A. Tripodi et al., “Fibrinogen measurement in cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass: Analysis of repeatability and agreement of Clauss method within and between six different laboratories,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 109–117, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ågren, A. T. Wikman, A. Östlund, and G. Edgren, “TEG® functional fibrinogen analysis may overestimate fibrinogen levels,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 933–935, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Thomas, H. Rein, K. Strandberg, and U. Schött, “Coagulative safety of epidural catheters after major upper gastrointestinal surgery: advanced and routine coagulation analysis in 38 patients,” Perioperative Medicine, vol. 5, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Schlimp, J. Cadamuro, C. Solomon, H. Redl, and H. Schöchl, “The effect of fibrinogen concentrate and factor XIII on thromboelastometry in 33% diluted blood with albumin, gelatine, hydroxyethyl starch or saline in vitro,” Blood Transfusion, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 510–517, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. G. Nielsen, W. Q. Gurley, and T. M. Burch, “The Impact of Factor XIII on Coagulation Kinetics and Clot Strength Determined by Thrombelastography,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 120–123, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ogawa, F. Szlam, D. Bolliger, T. Nishimura, E. P. Chen, and K. A. Tanaka, “The Impact of Hematocrit on Fibrin Clot Formation Assessed by Rotational Thromboelastometry,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 16–21, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Jensen, P. I. Johansson, L. Bochsen et al., “Fibrinogen function is impaired in whole blood from patients with cyanotic congenital heart disease,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 167, no. 5, pp. 2210–2214, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. T. Peng and S. G. Rhind, “Thromboelastographic Study of Psychophysiological Stress,” Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 497–512, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. C. Carroll, R. M. Craft, J. J. Chavez, C. C. Snider, R. K. Kirby, and E. Cohen, “Measurement of functional fibrinogen levels using the Thrombelastograph,” Journal of Clinical Anesthesia, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 186–190, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Rizza, Z. Ricci, C. Pezzella et al., “Kaolin-activated thromboelastography and standard coagulation assays in cyanotic and acyanotic infants undergoing complex cardiac surgery: a prospective cohort study,” Pediatric Anesthesia, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 170–180, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Parker, K. A. Eley, S. Von Kier, O. Pearson, and S. R. Watt-Smith, “Functional fibrinogen to platelet ratio using thromboelastography as a predictive parameter for thrombotic complications following free tissue transfer surgery: A preliminary study,” Microsurgery, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 512–519, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Ostrowski, N. Haase, R. B. Müller et al., “Association between biomarkers of endothelial injury and hypocoagulability in patients with severe sepsis: A prospective study,” Critical Care, vol. 19, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
J. S. Hagemo, S. Stanworth, N. P. Juffermans et al., “Prevalence, predictors and outcome of hypofibrinogenaemia in trauma: A multicentre observational study,” Critical Care, vol. 18, no. 2, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. K. McQuilten, M. Bailey, P. A. Cameron et al., “Fibrinogen concentration and use of fibrinogen supplementation with cryoprecipitate in patients with critical bleeding receiving massive transfusion: a bi-national cohort study,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 131–141, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhou, Y. Xin, Q. Ding et al., “Thromboelastography predicts risks of obstetric complication occurrence in (hypo)dysfibrinogenemia patients under non-pregnant state,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology and Physiology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 149–156, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Larsson, N. Tynngård, T. Kander, J. Bonnevier, and U. Schött, “Comparison of point-of-care hemostatic assays, routine coagulation tests, and outcome scores in critically ill patients,” Journal of Critical Care, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 1032–1038, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. McCully, L. J. Fabricant, N. R. Kunio et al., “The international normalized ratio overestimates coagulopathy in stable trauma and surgical patients,” Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 75, no. 6, pp. 947–953, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shakur, I. Roberts, and R. Bautista, “Effects of tranexamic acid on death, vascular occlusive events, and blood transfusion in trauma patients with significant haemorrhage (CRASH-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 376, no. 9734, pp. 23–32, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shakur, I. Roberts, B. Fawole et al., “Effect of early tranexamic acid administration on mortality, hysterectomy, and other morbidities in women with post-partum haemorrhage (woman): An international, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 389, pp. 2105–2116, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Godier, K. Parmar, K. Manandhar, and B. J. Hunt, “An in vitro study of the effects of t-PA and tranexamic acid on whole blood coagulation and fibrinolysis,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 154–161, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Schlimp, C. Solomon, M. Ranucci, G. Hochleitner, H. Redl, and H. Schöchl, “The effectiveness of different functional fibrinogen polymerization assays in eliminating platelet contribution to clot strength in thromboelastometry,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 269–276, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. J. Schlimp, C. Solomon, G. Hochleitner, J. Zipperle, H. Redl, and H. Schöchl, “Thromboelastometric maximum clot firmness in platelet-free plasma is influenced by the assay used,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Prüller, A. Münch, A. Preininger et al., “Comparison of functional fibrinogen (FF/CFF) and FIBTEM in surgical patients – a retrospective study,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM), vol. 54, no. 3, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. G. Nielsen, “A comparison of the Thrombelastograph and the ROTEM,” Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 247–252, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Tomori, D. Hupalo, K. Teranishi et al., “Evaluation of coagulation stages of hemorrhaged swine: Comparison of thromboelastography and rotational elastometry,” Blood Coagulation & Fibrinolysis, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 20–27, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. N. Harr, E. E. Moore, T. L. Chin et al., “Viscoelastic hemostatic fibrinogen assays detect fibrinolysis early,” European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 49–56, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Abuelkasem, S. Lu, K. Tanaka, R. Planinsic, and T. Sakai, “Comparison between thrombelastography and thromboelastometry in hyperfibrinolysis detection during adult liver transplantation,” British Journal of Anaesthesia, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 507–512, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Gall, P. Vulliamy, S. Gillespie et al., “The S100A10 Pathway Mediates an Occult Hyperfibrinolytic Subtype in Trauma Patients,” Annals of Surgery, p. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Gomez-Builes, S. A. Acuna, B. Nascimento, F. Madotto, and S. B. Rizoli, “Harmful or Physiologic,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 127, no. 4, pp. 840–849, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. B. Moore, E. E. Moore, E. Gonzalez et al., “Hyperfibrinolysis, physiologic fibrinolysis, and fibrinolysis shutdown: the spectrum of postinjury fibrinolysis and relevance to antifibrinolytic therapy,” The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 811–817, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. B. Moore, E. E. Moore, I. N. Liras et al., “Acute Fibrinolysis Shutdown after Injury Occurs Frequently and Increases Mortality: A Multicenter Evaluation of 2,540 Severely Injured Patients,” Journal of the American College of Surgeons, vol. 222, no. 4, pp. 347–355, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Cardenas, C. E. Wade, B. A. Cotton et al., “Teg Lysis Shutdown Represents Coagulopathy in Bleeding Trauma Patients,” Shock, p. 1, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Carroll, R. Craft, and R. Langdon, “Early Evaluation of Acute Traumatic Coagulopathy by Thrombelastography,” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 51, no. 1, p. 280, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Henry T. Peng et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

6849

Downloads

2494

Citations