Impact of Simulated Knee Injuries on the Patellofemoral and Tibiofemoral Kinematics Investigated with an Electromagnetic Tracking Approach: A Cadaver Study

Table 1

The maximum deviation magnitude for each trajectory in comparison to the physiological case. This is the most extreme point that was reached during the motion. For the mean calculation, we chose the absolute value.

	Knee 1			Knee 2			Knee 3			Mean			SD
Patella	5.0	3.0	7.0	1.0	1.0	2.0	3.0	4.0	4.0	3.0	2.7	4.3	1.6	1.2	2.1	Rotation	Figure 4(b)	ACL rupture
	5.0	18.0	15.0	1.0	4.0	1.0	5.0	4.0	5.0	3.7	8.7	7.0	1.9	6.6	5.9	Translation [mm]	Figure 4(b)	ACL rupture
	3.0	1.0	4.0	2.0	6.0	2.0	1.0	5.0	2.0	2.0	4.0	2.7	0.8	2.2	0.9	Rotation	Figure 7	Complex injury
	10.0	12.0	6.0	6.0	4.0	12.0	8.0	4.0	6.0	8.0	6.7	8.0	1.6	3.8	2.8	Translation [mm]	Figure 8	Complex injury
Medial condyle	3.0	1.0	4.0	1.0	0.0	1.5	0.5	1.5	2.5	1.5	0.8	2.7	1.1	0.6	1.0	Rotation	Figure 5(b)	ACL rupture
	3.0	12.0	4.0	1.0	2.0	2.0	2.0	4.0	1.0	2.0	6.0	2.3	0.8	4.3	1.2	Translation [mm]	Figure 5(b)	ACL rupture
	2.0	0.5	3.0	1.0	0.0	1.0	5.0	0.0	6.0	2.7	0.2	3.3	1.7	0.2	2.1	Rotation	Figure 7	Complex injury
	6.0	10.0	4.0	2.0	2.0	1.0	6.0	12.0	0.0	4.7	8.0	1.7	1.9	4.3	1.7	Translation [mm]	Figure 8	Complex injury
Lateral condyle	3.5	2.0	5.0	0.5	2.0	1.0	1.5	0.5	2.5	1.8	1.5	2.8	1.2	0.7	1.6	Rotation	Figure 6(b)	ACL rupture
	2.0	16.0	2.0	1.0	1.0	4.0	1.0	5.0	2.0	1.3	7.3	2.7	0.5	6.3	0.9	Translation [mm]	Figure 6(b)	ACL rupture
	1.5	1.0	2.0	2.5	1.0	3.0	1.0	0.5	2.0	1.7	0.8	2.3	0.6	0.2	0.5	Rotation	Figure 7	Complex injury
	4.0	10.0	6.0	2.0	3.0	4.0	2.0	4.0	2.0	2.7	5.7	4.0	0.9	3.1	1.6	Translation [mm]	Figure 8	Complex injury