BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article
Special Issue

Research on Saliva Secretion and Composition

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 7290913 |

Farah Asa’ad, Marco Fiore, Aniello Alfieri, Paolo Daniele Maria Pigatto, Chiara Franchi, Emilio Berti, Carlo Maiorana, Giovanni Damiani, "Saliva as a Future Field in Psoriasis Research", BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 7290913, 6 pages, 2018.

Saliva as a Future Field in Psoriasis Research

Academic Editor: Fernando C. e Silva
Received31 Jan 2018
Accepted11 Apr 2018
Published20 May 2018


Psoriasis is a skin inflammatory disease characterized by an increased body of comorbidities, including parodontopathy. Despite the visibility of skin lesions, prognostic biomarkers, related to disease monitoring and therapeutic effectiveness, are still missing. Although several markers have been studied, none of them has been identified as an independent prognostic factor. This concise review aims to summarize the current knowledge and results in saliva research applied to psoriasis. Combination of different markers could improve the prognostic prediction in patients with psoriasis. Future studies are needed to implement research on salivary biomarkers and their prognostic/therapeutic effects in the management of patients with psoriasis.

1. Psoriasis and the Need of New Biomarkers

Psoriasis is an immune-mediated systemic inflammatory skin disease, interpreted as complex, because of the genetic, immunological, and environmental aspects [15]. The clinically visible manifestations are objectivized on the skin where well demarcated, infiltrated, and peripherally erythematous skin plaques are present, due to altered differentiation and hyperproliferation to the keratinocytes together with multifarious inflammatory cells and neoangiogenesis [6, 7]. An increased body of evidence has linked psoriasis to several comorbidities such as cardiovascular and periodontal ones and suggested the need for an affordable set of biomarkers [8, 9]. Currently, many biomarkers were proposed for psoriasis; however, none of them was considered as a valid and accepted disease marker. The ideal biomarker is a biological hallmark that is sensitive, specific, reproducible, and capable of identifying a physiological or pathological status and/or a therapeutic response [10]. Furthermore, the biomarker assay should be validated, standardized, and easy to perform [10]. In the past years, the biomarkers research in psoriasis focused on assessing blood and skin samples, genetics, and transcriptomics with contrasting results [11]. Therefore, saliva with its two secretory pathways has gained growing interest as an alternative and available biological sample to analyze, looking for biomarkers (Figure 1) [1214]. Available evidence, first maturated in the field of rheumatic diseases, suggests the relation between saliva, oral inflammation, and systemic health. In addition, oral microbiome is also related to both skin and gastrointestinal system, consequently modulating the systemic inflammation [15]. This concise review summarizes the current evidence regarding the applications of saliva in psoriasis and describes future approaches in the field.

2. Salivary Changes in Rheumatic Diseases

Several rheumatic diseases may compromise the physiological salivary function (Figure 2), causing acute and chronic disorders. They are analyzed in detail in Table 1. The most common oral changes in rheumatic diseases are hyposalivation (low salivary flow) and xerostomia. In Sjögren’s syndrome, the lymphocytic infiltration of salivary glands can lead to secretory hypofunction leading to xerostomia [16]. The progression of lymphocytic infiltration gives rise to focal sialadenitis, salivary gland dysfunction, and, in about quarter of patients, an expansion of the parotid and submandibular glands, which are often associated with a reduced salivary flow [16]. Furthermore, the reduced antimicrobial effect of the salivary secretion and the poor lubrication of the mouth facilitate the onset of oral infections, mucosal fragility, and burning mouth syndrome (BMS). Other complications include oral candidiasis, dental caries, dysphagia, and dyspepsia [17]. In systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), saliva was demonstrated to be an incredible source of biomarkers (Table 1), revealing an impaired antioxidant power with reduced levels of glutathione and conversely high levels of malondialdehyde and uric acid [18]. This data was also confirmed by the high levels of proinflammatory salivary cytokines IL-1β and IL-4, which are also positive markers to periodontal disease [19]. Thus, the high levels of caries found in SLE patients might be justified by the inflammatory microenvironment of the oral cavity and by the decrease in salivary flow, pH, and buffer capacity [20]. The Behçet disease, instead, is correlated with dysbiosis of the salivary microbiota, probably implicated in recurrent aphthous stomatitis [21]. Xerostomia is also common in bullous pemphigoid and in mucous membrane pemphigoid. Despite a correlation between BP-180 salivary levels being discouraged in bullous pemphigoid [22], the correlation between skin disease severity, the Autoimmune Bullous Skin Disorder Intensity Score (ABSIS), and salivary levels of both desmogleins 1 and 3 remains a matter of debate in pemphigus vulgaris [22, 23]. Furthermore, saliva suggested a possible connection between herpes simplex and pemphigus vulgaris; Ruocco et al. detected herpes simplex DNA in very early stages of pemphigus vulgaris, leading to the hypothesis of a potential viral role in triggering the autoimmune response [24].

DiseaseSalivary changeEffect

Sjögren’s syndromeSalivary flow↓[16]

Systemic lupus erythematosusGlutathione↓[18]
Uric acid↑[18]
Salivary flow↓[20]

3. Saliva and Biochemical Characteristics in Psoriasis

In many studies, different salivary components have been evaluated in psoriasis patients (Table 2), such as salivary total protein, salivary immunoglobulin A (IgA), IgG, lysozyme, C-reactive protein (CRP), and Haptoglobin. However, findings have been inconclusive for some markers due to contradictory results between studies, which might be attributed to the difference in the type of investigated psoriasis [2931]. Although Krasteva and colleagues reported no statistically significant difference in the salivary level of IgA, assessed by radial immunodiffusion, between psoriasis patients and healthy controls, they observed that patients with a PASI > 10 had a tendency to show lower levels of IgA, compared to patients with a PASI < 10, suggesting that patients with a PASI > 10 might be at high risk of developing microbial infections that could trigger psoriasis [25]. In the same study, the authors reported a statistically significant increase of salivary C-reactive protein (CRP), associated with the inflammatory nature of the psoriasis, and, as known, CRP has a prognostic significance for the worsening of psoriasis [32]. Similarly, increased salivary levels of Haptoglobin were reported, indicating a local defense mechanism against psoriasis [25]. The levels of salivary CRP and Haptoglobin were determined by an immunoturbidimetric method.

DiseaseSalivary changeEffect

IL-1β↑[27, 28]

> 10; sAA: alpha amylase; K+: potassium; CRP: C-reactive protein; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; TGF: transforming growth factor; MCP: monocyte chemoattractant protein; IL: interleukin.

In another study, Soudan and coworkers assessed the alterations of other salivary components and their correlation with the severity of psoriasis [33]. Sodium (Na+), potassium (K+), chloride (Cl−), and alpha amylase (sAA) were analyzed using ISE (Ion Selective Electrode) technology for electrolyte measurements and LISA 500 plus systems for sAA. Findings showed a significantly higher K+ and sAA concentrations in psoriasis patients, with respect to controls, while there was no significant rise in the other investigated salivary ions. Nonetheless, these changes were not related to either the severity or the duration of psoriasis. Recently, Bottoni et al. analyzed the saliva proteomic components in psoriatic patients against diabetic patients and healthy controls, by attenuated total reflection (ATR) in conjunction with infrared spectroscopy. There were differences in the secondary structure composition of proteins between psoriatic and diabetic patients as compared to the control group [26]. Moreover, the authors concluded that the saliva spectra of the control group and that of the palmoplantar psoriatic patients differ from plaque psoriasis and diabetic patient spectra because of the absence of the amide II band and the presence of different secondary protein-structure conformations. Although all the previous findings suggest the difference in biochemical components between psoriasis patients and healthy individuals, and also between different psoriatic disease entities, more studies are required to support the preliminary results in literature.

4. Saliva and Correlated Biomarkers in Psoriasis

Although salivary biomarkers have been identified in various systemic diseases, evidence is still scarce on the biomarkers that appear in the saliva and are correlated to psoriasis [34, 35]. In this context, Ganzetti et al. evaluated the expression levels of interleukin- (IL-) 1β, IL-6, transforming growth factor- (TGF-) β1, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-) α, interferon- (IFN-) c, IL-17A, IL-4, IL-10, monocyte chemoattractant protein- (MCP-) 1, macrophage inflammatory protein- (MIP-) 1α, and MIP-1β in salivary secretions from patients with psoriasis, using multianalyte ELISA Arrays [27]. The authors reported a statistically significant greater expression of TNF-α, TGF-β1, MCP-1, and IL-1β in saliva of patients with psoriasis than in healthy subjects, with a positive correlation between IL-1β, TGF-β1, and MCP-1 expression and oral disease severity [27]. In fact, it was suggested that the increased expression of IL-1β in patients with psoriasis might explain why such individuals show more missing teeth and more alveolar bone resorption and periodontitis than healthy individuals, as previously reported [36]. Periodontitis is a destructive disease of the tooth-supporting tissues induced by bacterial biofilm [37] and, in highlight of the reported findings, it seems that psoriasis and periodontal disease share the underlying inflammatory process, especially that IL-1β could be responsible for tissue destruction in periodontal disease by increasing the levels of matrix metalloproteinases [38]. Higher IL-β salivary levels in psoriasis with respect to healthy individuals were supported in another study; Mastrolonardo et al. observed higher basal IL-1β levels among psoriatic patients suggesting an increase in its production [28]. Such changes in cytokine activity may play an important role in propagating inflammation in psoriatic skin. Furthermore, the association between psoriasis and oral mucosa could be indicated by the increased salivary [27] and serum levels of TGF-β1 and MCP-1 in psoriasis patients [39, 40]. In a different investigation, Ganzetti and coworkers confirmed the validity of saliva as a noninvasive tool to monitor inflammation in psoriasis [41]. At baseline, psoriasis patients had higher salivary levels of IL-1β, evaluated via an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), in comparison to healthy individuals. After 12 weeks of treatment with TNF-α inhibitors, IL-1β levels significantly reduced in comparison to that of baseline, but remained significantly higher than in healthy controls even after treatment. Nonetheless, larger cohort studies are still needed to confirm these findings.

5. Saliva as a Monitor for Antipsoriatic Drugs

For more than four decades, it was possible to predict plasma concentrations of drugs by measuring the salivary drug concentration, avoiding the need of venipuncture [42]. This is especially desirable in patients within the pediatric and geriatric population, in which venipuncture could be difficult to perform. The prediction of plasma concentration is mostly reliable if there is a documented correlation between plasma drug levels and clinical outcomes. In fact, this concentration is mostly reliable for nonionized drugs at normal plasma pH (phenytoin, phenobarbital, and antipyrine) but is unreliable for ionized drugs (chlorpropramide, tolbutamide, propranolol, and meperidine). In clinical practice, there is scarce evidence indicating whether this strategy is useful for antipsoriatic drugs. Pediatric patients with rheumatological diseases receiving methotrexate chronically have shown poor correlation between serum methotrexate concentrations and salivary levels [43]. Also, in a study that enrolled adults with various malignant diseases, the measurements of methotrexate salivary concentrations have shown no correlation with serum methotrexate levels, in monitoring patients after 24 hours of methotrexate infusions [44]. More recently, a sensitive and a simple quantifying method by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was shown to be a valid method for determination of saliva excretion on samples obtained after an intravenous administration of 1 mg/kg/dose of methotrexate to six patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia [45]. This method could be a promising tool for the quantification of methotrexate in the saliva of patients with psoriatic disease as well. The LC-MS/MS method has been also investigated for the measurement of cyclosporine in saliva and a correlation between the cyclosporine concentrations in fifteen paired blood-saliva samples from kidney transplant recipients was shown to be significant [46]. The method of saliva collection coupled with the LC-MS/MS quantification technique for cyclosporine analysis could be also beneficial if applied to psoriatic patients undergoing cyclosporine therapy. Less encouraging results were reported with the monoclonal fluorescent polarization immunoassay (FPIA) kit, adapted to salivary testing by using a novel extraction method developed and patented under the name of Middle East Research Institute (MERI) [47]. This method showed no significant correlation between blood and salivary cyclosporine levels [47]. Psoraderm 5, Meladinine, and Oxsoralen, three psoralens utilized during PUVA therapy, were well monitored with salivary sampling. This method is a noninvasive alternative to serum levels measurements and is suitable for routine applications; five or six salivary samples are sufficient to determine tmax in a patient starting photochemotherapy, while three samples are mandatory for Cmax [48]. Steroids, often prescribed for psoriasis treatment, may cause adrenocortical suppression; as a screening technique for iatrogenic adrenal suppression, morning salivary cortisol (MSC) has 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity [49]. MSC assay is an accurate tool for monitoring adrenal function and should be recommended for psoriatic patients who are on steroid therapy.

The techniques reviewed are well established methodologies for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), capillary electrophoresis (EC), liquid chromatography (LC), gas chromatography (LC or GC) coupled with UV spectroscopy, or mass spectrometry (MS) has been extensively applied to TDM, optimizing protocols for the analysis of drugs administered and the analysis of drug metabolites if necessary. Compared to sophisticated and large-scale techniques, like high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS), immunoassays are easily and readily miniaturized by employing nanostructured surface sensors or micro- and nanoparticles (NP), and microfluidic versions of these analytical devices are already available for research purposes. Recent advancements in point-of-care (PoC) technologies show great transformative promises for personalized preventive and predictive medicine. However, fields like TDM, which first allowed for personalized management of patients’ disease, are still lacking in the widespread application of PoC devices [50].

Future studies may be warranted to design PoC technologies, more reliable and less invasive procedures, for therapeutic antipsoriatic drug monitoring.

6. Future Perspectives

Salivary biomarkers levels tend to change in psoriasis (Figure 2), which reflect alterations in the their production/expression. Although salivary biomarkers in psoriasis patients have been evaluated in different studies, these investigations were only of a small sample size and focused only on specific biomarkers. Therefore, studies with wider salivary profiling and larger sample size are needed to confirm the preliminary findings in literature. Moreover, studies monitoring the salivary level changes of these biomarkers after psoriasis treatment are recommended, as more research on potential salivary prognostic biomarkers in psoriasis patients is still needed. In fact, salivary biomarkers might be helpful detectors of psoriasis severity and disease progression and could serve as valuable diagnostics in the future.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.


  1. W.-H. Boehncke and M. P. Schön, “Psoriasis,” The Lancet, vol. 386, no. 9997, pp. 983–994, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. G. Damiani, A. Radaeli, A. Olivini, P. Calvara-Pinton, and M. Malerba, “Increased airway inflammation in patients with psoriasis,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 175, no. 4, pp. 797–799, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. V. Della Valle, M. Maggioni, C. Carrera et al., “A mysterious abdominal pain during active psoriasis,” Internal and Emergency Medicine, pp. 1–4, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. G. Damiani, C. Franchi, P. Pigatto et al., “Outcomes assessment of hepatitis C virus-positive psoriatic patients treated using pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin compared to new Direct-Acting Antiviral agents,” World Journal of Hepatology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 329–336, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. Fiore, S. Leone, A.-E. Maraolo et al., “Liver illness and psoriatic patients,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 3140983, 12 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. H. Boehncke and N.-C. Brembilla, “Unmet needs in the field of psoriasis: pathogenesis and treatment,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, pp. 1–17, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. R. Rezzani, L. F. Rodella, G. Favero, G. Damiani, C. Paganelli, and R. J. Reiter, “Attenuation of ultraviolet A-induced alterations in NIH3T3 dermal fibroblasts by melatonin,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 382–391, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. M. Malerba, A. A. Radaeli, A. Olivini et al., “Exhaled nitric oxide as a biomarker in COPD and related comorbidities,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 271918, 7 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Malerba, G. Damiani, A. Radaeli, B. Ragnoli, A. Olivini, and P. G. Calzavara-Pinton, “Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy in psoriasis reduces proinflammatory cytokine levels and improves vitiligo and neutrophilic asthma,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 1544-1545, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group, “Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 89–95, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. F. Villanova, P. Di Meglio, and F.-O. Nestle, “Biomarkers in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 72, supplement 2, pp. ii104–ii110, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  12. R. J. Turner and H. Sugiya, “Understanding salivary fluid and protein secretion,” Oral Diseases, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Nakamoto, A. Srivastava, and V.-G. Romanenko, “Functional and molecular characterization of the fluid secretion mechanism in human parotid acinar cells,” American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 292, no. 6, pp. R2380–R2390, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  14. J.-E. Melvin, D. Yule, T. Shuttleworth, and T. Begenisich, “Regulation of fluid and electrolyte secretion in salivary gland acinar cells,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 67, pp. 445–469, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Gutiérrez-Corrales, E. Campano-Cuevas, G. Castillo-Dalí, D. Torres-Lagares, and J.-L. Gutiérrez-Pérez, “Ability of salivary biomarkers in the prognostic of systemic and buccal inflammation,” Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. e716–e722, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. R. Jonsson, U. Kroneld, K. Bäckman, B. Magnusson, and A. Tarkowski, “Progression of sialadenitis in Sjögren's syndrome,” Rheumatology, vol. 32, no. 7, pp. 578–581, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. S. Kassan and H. M. Moutsopoulos, “Clinical manifestations and early diagnosis of Sjögren syndrome,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 164, no. 12, pp. 1275–1284, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  18. M. Moori, H. Ghafoori, and R. Sariri, “Nonenzymatic antioxidants in saliva of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Lupus, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 265–271, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C.-P. Marques, E.-C. Victor, M.-M. Franco et al., “Salivary levels of inflammatory cytokines and their association to periodontal disease in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. A case-control study,” Cytokine, vol. 85, pp. 165–170, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  20. J. P. Loyola Rodriguez, L. J. Galvan Torres, R. E. Martinez Martinez et al., “Frequency of dental caries in active and inactive systemic lupus erythematous patients: salivary and bacterial factors,” Lupus, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1349–1356, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. N. Seoudi, L. A. Bergmeier, F. Drobniewski et al., “The oral mucosal and salivary microbial community of Behçet's syndrome and recurrent aphthous stomatitis,” Journal of Oral Microbiology, vol. 7, Article ID 27150, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  22. D. Andreadis, G. Lorenzini, D. Drakoulakos et al., “Detection of pemphigus desmoglein 1 and desmoglein 3 autoantibodies and pemphigoid BP180 autoantibodies in saliva and comparison with serum values,” European Journal of Oral Sciences, vol. 114, no. 5, pp. 374–380, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Ali, C. Kelly, S.-J. Challacombe et al., “Serum and salivary IgG and IgA antibodies to desmoglein 3 in mucosal pemphigus vulgaris,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 175, no. 1, pp. 113–121, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  24. E. Ruocco, V. Ruocco, A. Lo Schiavo, G. Brunetti, and R. Wolf, “Viruses and pemphigus: an intriguing never-ending story,” Dermatology, vol. 229, no. 4, pp. 310–315, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. A. Krasteva, I. Grozdev, A. Ivanova et al., “Psoriatic patients and salivary components,” Oral Health and Dental Management in the Black Sea Countries, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 12–15, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  26. U. Bottoni, R. Tiriolo, S. A. Pullano et al., “Infrared saliva analysis of psoriatic and diabetic patients: similarities in protein components,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 379–384, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G. Ganzetti, A. Campanati, A. Santarelli et al., “Involvement of the oral cavity in psoriasis: results of a clinical study,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 172, no. 1, pp. 282–285, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  28. M. Mastrolonardo, D. Alicino, R. Zefferino et al., “Effect of psychological stress on salivary interleukin-1beta in psoriasis,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 206–211, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S.-M. Syrjänen, “Chemical analysis of parotid saliva and lacrimal fluid in psoriatics,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 275, no. 3, pp. 152–155, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  30. B. Gasior-Chrzan and E. S. Falk, “Lysozyme and IgA concentrations in serum and saliva from psoriatic patients,” Acta Dermato-Venereologica, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 138–140, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  31. D. Koh, Y. Yang, L. Khoo et al., “Salivary immunoglobulin A and lysozyme in patients with psoriasis,” Annals, Academy of Medicine, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 307–310, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  32. P. Rocha-Pereira, A. Santos-Silva, I. Rebelo et al., “Inflammatory response in mild and in severe psoriasis,” British Journal of Dermatology, vol. 150, no. 5, pp. 917–928, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. A. Soudan, S. A. Daoud, and A. M. Mashlah, “Study of some salivary changes in cutaneous psoriatic patients,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 386–389, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  34. D. Malamud, “Saliva as a diagnostic fluid,” Dental Clinics of North America, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 159–178, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  35. S. J. C. Farnaud, O. Kosti, S. J. Getting, and D. Renshaw, “Saliva: physiology and diagnostic potential in health and disease,” The Scientific World Journal, vol. 10, pp. 434–456, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. H.-T. Fadel, I. Flytström, A.-M. Calander et al., “Profiles of dental caries and periodontal disease in individuals with or without psoriasis,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 477–485, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  37. T.-E. Van Dyke and A.-J. van Winkelhoff, “Infection and inflammatory mechanisms,” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 84, supplement, pp. S1–S7, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  38. S. Sawada, N. Chosa, A. Ishisaki, and K. Naruishi, “Enhancement of gingival inflammation induced by synergism of IL-1β and IL-6,” Journal of Biomedical Research, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–40, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Zaher, O. G. Shaker, M.-H. El-Komy et al., “Serum and tissue expression of transforming growth factor beta 1 in psoriasis,” European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 406–409, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  40. S. Lembo, R. Capasso, A. Balato et al., “MCP-1 in psoriatic patients: effect of biological therapy,” Journal of Dermatological Treatment, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 83–86, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  41. G. Ganzetti, A. Campanati, A. Santarelli et al., “Salivary interleukin-1β: oral inflammatory biomarker in patients with psoriasis,” Journal of International Medical Research, vol. 44, supplement 1, pp. 10–14, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  42. N. Idkaidek, H. Agha, and T. Arafat, “Saliva versus plasma bioequivalence of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide in humans: validation of classes II and IV drugs of the salivary excretion classification system,” Drug Research, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 54–59, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  43. J. Press, M. Berkovitch, R. Laxer et al., “Evaluation of therapeutic drug monitoring of methotrexate in saliva of children with rheumatic diseases,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 247–250, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  44. H. Schrøder, K. Jensen, and M. Brandsborg, “Lack of correlation between methotrexate concentrations in serum, saliva and sweat after 24 h methotrexate infusions,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 537–541, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. I. Rodin, A. Braun, A. Stavrianidi, and O. Shpigun, “A validated LC-MS/MS method forrapid determination of methotrexate in human saliva and its application to an excretion evaluation study,” Journal of Chromatography. B, Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences, vol. 937, pp. 1–6, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  46. A. Mendonza, R. Gohh, and F. Akhlaghi, “Determination of cyclosporine in saliva using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry,” Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 569–575, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. Aboujaoud, M. Masri, S. Rizk et al., “Could salivary cyclosporine dosage replace the whole blood cyclosporine measurements in renal transplant patients?” Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 136–141, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  48. S. E. Shephard, M. Zogg, G. Burg, and R. G. Panizzon, “Measurement of 5-methoxypsoralen and 8-methoxypsoralen in saliva of PUVA patients as a noninvasive, clinically relevant alternative to monitoring in blood,” Archives of Dermatological Research, vol. 291, no. 9, pp. 491–499, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. R. S. Patel, S. R. Shaw, A. M. Wallace, and G. W. McGarry, “Efficacy and systemic tolerability of mometasone furoate and betamethasone sodium phosphate,” The Journal of Laryngology & Otology, vol. 118, no. 11, pp. 866–871, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. B. Sanavio and S. Krol, “On the slow diffusion of point-of-care systems in therapeutic drug monitoring,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, vol. 3, article 20, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Farah Asa’ad et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.