Research Article

The Impact of IL-16 3′UTR Polymorphism rs859 on Lung Carcinoma Susceptibility among Chinese Han Individuals

Table 5

The relationship between IL-16-rs859, CYP24A1-rs4809957, and FBN1-rs1042078 and lung cancer risk in males.

GeneSNPModelGenotypeControlCaseCrude AnalysisAdjusted Analysis
(N = 278)(N = 245)OR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-value

IL-16
(N = 523)
rs859
(call rate 99.81%)
CodominantA/A67 (24.1%)71 (29.1%)1.000.1901.000.084
G/A137 (49.3%)123 (50.4%)0.85 (0.56-1.28)0.79 (0.49-1.28)
G/G74 (26.6%)50 (20.5%)0.64 (0.39-1.04)0.53 (0.30-0.94)
DominantA/A67 (24.1%)71 (29.1%)1.000.2001.000.120
G/A-G/G211 (75.9%)173 (70.9%)0.77 (0.52-1.14)0.70 (0.44-1.10)
RecessiveA/A-G/A204 (73.4%)194 (79.5%)1.000.1001.000.045
G/G74 (26.6%)50 (20.5%)0.71 (0.47-1.07)0.62 (0.39-0.99)
Log-additive---------0.80 (0.63-1.02)0.0730.73 (0.55-0.97)0.029

CYP24A1
(N = 523)
rs4809957
(call rate 100%)
CodominantG/G98 (35.2%)90 (36.7%)1.000.8101.000.280
G/A136 (48.9%)121 (49.4%)0.97 (0.66-1.41)0.91 (0.59-1.41)
A/A44 (15.8%)34 (13.9%)0.84 (0.49-1.43)0.61 (0.33-1.13)
DominantG/G98 (35.2%)90 (36.7%)1.000.7201.000.390
G/A-A/A180 (64.8%)155 (63.3%)0.94 (0.66-1.34)0.83 (0.55-1.26)
RecessiveG/G-G/A234 (84.2%)211 (86.1%)1.000.5301.000.120
A/A44 (15.8%)34 (13.9%)0.86 (0.53-1.39)0.64 (0.36-1.13)
Log-additive---------0.93 (0.72-1.20)0.5700.81 (0.60-1.09)0.160

FBN1
(N = 523)
rs1042078
(call rate 100%)
CodominantA/A85 (30.6%)65 (26.5%)1.000.2201.000.280
A/G138 (49.6%)140 (57.1%)1.33 (0.89-1.98)1.31 (0.83-2.08)
G/G55 (19.8%)40 (16.3%)0.95 (0.57-1.60)0.90 (0.50-1.62)
DominantA/A85 (30.6%)65 (26.5%)1.000.3101.000.440
A/G-G/G193 (69.4%)180 (73.5%)1.22 (0.83-1.79)1.19 (0.77-1.85)
RecessiveA/A-A/G223 (80.2%)205 (83.7%)1.000.3001.000.270
G/G55 (19.8%)40 (16.3%)0.79 (0.50-1.24)0.75 (0.45-1.25)
Log-additive---------1.01 (0.79-1.31)0.9200.98 (0.73-1.31)0.900

SNP: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; OR: Odds Ratio; 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, smoking status, and alcohol drinking status.
Bold italics indicates the statistical significance (P < 0.05).