Research Article

The Impact of IL-16 3′UTR Polymorphism rs859 on Lung Carcinoma Susceptibility among Chinese Han Individuals

Table 8

The relationship between IL-16-rs859, CYP24A1-rs4809957,and FBN1-rs1042078 and lung cancer risk among nondrinkers.

GeneSNPModelGenotypeControlCaseCrude AnalysisAdjusted Analysis
(N = 215)(N = 229)OR (95% CI)P-valueOR (95% CI)P-value

IL-16
(N = 444)
rs859
(call rate 99.77%)
CodominantA/A47 (21.9%)62 (27.2%)1.000.2001.000.110
G/A109 (50.7%)118 (51.8%)0.82 (0.52-1.30)0.78 (0.48-1.27)
G/G59 (27.4%)48 (21.1%)0.62 (0.36-1.06)0.54 (0.31-0.96)
DominantA/A47 (21.9%)62 (27.2%)1.000.1901.000.130
G/A-G/G168 (78.1%)166 (72.8%)0.75 (0.48-1.16)0.70 (0.44-1.11)
RecessiveA/A-G/A156 (72.6%)180 (79.0%)1.000.1201.000.062
G/G59 (27.4%)48 (21.1%)0.71 (0.46-1.09)0.64 (0.40-1.03)
Log-additive---------0.80 (0.63-1.09)0.0560.74 (0.55-0.98)0.036

CYP24A1
(N = 444)
rs4809957
(call rate 100%)
CodominantG/G78 (36.3%)89 (38.9%)1.000.6501.000.550
G/A106 (49.3%)103 (45.0%)0.85 (0.57-1.28)0.79 (0.51-1.21)
A/A31 (14.4%)37 (16.2%)1.05 (0.59-1.84)0.88 (0.48-1.61)
DominantG/G78 (36.3%)89 (38.9%)1.000.5701.000.300
G/A-A/A137 (63.7%)140 (61.1%)0.90 (0.61-1.32)0.81 (0.54-1.21)
RecessiveG/G-G/A184 (85.6%)192 (83.8%)1.000.6101.000.980
A/A31 (14.4%)37 (16.2%)1.14 (0.68-1.92)1.01 (0.58-1.75)
Log-additive---------0.98 (0.75-1.29)0.9000.90 (0.68-1.20)0.480

FBN1
(N = 444)
rs1042078
(call rate 100%)
CodominantA/A63 (29.3%)61 (26.6%)1.000.0581.000.210
A/G100 (46.5%)130 (56.8%)1.34 (0.87-2.08)1.18 (0.74-1.87)
G/G52 (24.2%)38 (16.6%)0.75 (0.44-1.30)0.74 (0.42-1.32)
DominantA/A63 (29.3%)61 (26.6%)1.000.5301.000.880
A/G-G/G152 (70.7%)168 (73.4%)1.14 (0.75-1.73)1.04 (0.67-1.61)
RecessiveA/A-A/G163 (75.8%)191 (83.4%)1.000.0461.000.110
G/G52 (24.2%)38 (16.6%)0.62 (0.39-1.00)0.67 (0.41-1.09)
Log-additive---------0.90 (0.69-1.18)0.4500.88 (0.66-1.18)0.400

SNP: Single Nucleotide Polymorphism; OR: Odds Ratio; 95% CI: 95% Confidence Interval.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis.
P-value: P-values calculated by unconditional logistic regression analysis with adjustment for age, gender, and smoking status.
Bold italics indicates the statistical significance (P < 0.05).