Research Article

Model Analysis of Digital Models in Moderate to Severe Crowding: In Vivo Validation and Clinical Application

Table 2

Mean linear measurements of arch width and arch length of cast model and two digital models.

Cast (C)Cast scan (CS)Intraoral scan (IS)Mean difference/
(mean ± SD)(mean ± SD)(mean ± SD)standard error (p value)

Maxilla
 AWC35.25 ± 2.4635.20 ± 2.5634.99 ± 2.41C-CS.22/.39 (1.00)
C-IS.14/.09 (.45)
CS-IS−.08/.39 (1.00)
 AWM48.98 ± 3.7548.84 ± 3.5648.88 ± 3.90C-CS−.08/.43 (1.00)
C-IS−.13/.15 (1.00)
CS-IS−.06/.42 (1.00)
 AL40.87 ± 2.8840.44 ± 2.8139.28 ± 2.58C-CS.26/.53 (1.00)
C-IS1.35/.30 (.00)
CS-IS1.09/.66 (.23)

Mandible
 AWC27.23 ± 2.8627.20 ± 2.8627.10 ± 2.84C-CS.03/.41 (1.00)
C-IS.13/.06 (.10)
CS-IS.10/.42 (1.00)
 AWM42.58 ± 3.1142.13 ± 3.5342.43 ± 3.22C-CS.45/.55 (1.00)
C-IS.15/.06 (.03)
CS-IS−.30/.55 (1.00)
 AL36.36 ± 2.4636.33 ± 2.5335.51 ± 2.14C-CS.14/.50 (1.00)
C-IS.95/.26 (.00)
CS-IS.81/.51 (.35)

AWC, intercanine width; AWM, intermolar width; AL, arch length ( = 40); values were calculated by RM-ANOVA; ; .