Abstract
Background. Plumbagin, a medicinal plant-derived 5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone, is an emerging drug with a variety of pharmacological effects, including potent anticancer activity. We have previously shown that plumbagin improves the efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer and it is now being evaluated in phase I clinical trial. However, the development of formulation of plumbagin as a compound with sparing solubility in water is challenging. Methods. We have formulated plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion using pneumatically controlled high pressure homogenization of oleic acid dispersions with polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate as surfactant. Nanoemulsion formulations were characterized for particle size distribution by dynamic light scattering (DLS). The kinetics of in vitro drug release was determined by equilibrium dialysis. Anticancer activity toward prostate cancer cells PTEN-P2 was assessed by MTS (Owen’s reagent) assay. Results. Particle size distribution of nanoemulsions is tunable and depends on the surfactant concentration. Nanoemulsion formulations of plumbagin with 1-3.5% (w/w) of surfactant showed robust stability of size distribution over time. Plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion with average hydrodynamic diameter of 135 nm showed exponential release of plumbagin with a half-life of 6.1 h in simulated gastric fluid, 7.0 h in simulated intestinal fluid, and displayed enhanced antiproliferative effect toward prostate cancer cells PTEN-P2 compared to free plumbagin. Conclusion. High drug-loading capacity, retention of nanoparticle size, kinetics of release under simulated physiological conditions, and increased antiproliferative activity indicate that oleic-acid based nanoemulsion formulation is a suitable delivery system of plumbagin.
1. Introduction
Plumbagin (5-hydroxy-2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone, Figure 1) is a plant-derived secondary metabolite found in plant families such as Plumbaginaceae, Ebenaceae, Dioncophyllaceae, Ancestrocladaceae, and Droseraceae [1]. Plumbagin possesses multiple pharmacological activities, such as anticancer, antiatherosclerotic, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, hypolipidemic, and neuroprotective activities [2, 3]. Recently, significant research effort was developed to evaluate antitumor effects of plumbagin. Plumbagin showed potent anti-tumor activity in various tumor models, including breast cancer [4], Ehrlich ascites carcinoma [5], esophageal cancer [6], lung cancer [7], melanoma [8], ovarian cancer [9], promyelocytic leukemia [10], and prostate cancer [11–13]. Plumbagin exhibits these anticancer effects via interaction with multiple targets and modulation of various molecular signaling pathways, including AMPK, CDK1/CDC2, cyclin B1, cyclin D1, NF-kappaB, p53, p21 Waf1/Cip1, p27 Kip1, Nrf2/ARE, PI3K/AKT/mTOR, Ras, STAT3/PLK1/AKT, and Wnt [3], resulting in induction of apoptosis and autophagy, cell cycle arrest, inhibition of invasion, and metastasis, as well as antiangiogenic activities [2].
Great progress has recently been made regarding its use in prostate cancer. For example, experiments from Dr. Verma’s laboratory demonstrated that plumbagin administered by intraperitoneal injection strongly inhibited tumor growth or delayed disease progression in several models of prostate cancer including subcutaneous xenografts, hormone-independent orthotopic tumors, transgenic TRAMP/FVB, and knock-out mouse models [14–16]. It also decreased the occurrence of metastases and therefore may be effective for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer [15]. In addition, plumbagin considerably improved the efficacy of castration and chemical ADT in hormone-sensitive models of prostate cancer, causing tumor regression and increasing mouse survival when used in combination [11, 12]. IND-enabling preclinical studies were completed, leading to the first-in-human clinical trial for the combination of plumbagin and ADT in prostate cancer patients (NCT03137758).
Translation of plumbagin into clinical application unfortunately is made difficult by its poor water solubility. Drug solubility fundamentally influences its pharmacokinetics, its rate and extent of absorption, and its bioavailability after peroral administration [17], and thus essentially its therapeutic efficacy. As the drug advances into the clinic, it becomes critical to develop a formulation that considerably increases its solubility while potentially reducing systemic toxicity. Indeed, a better formulation would improve the patient’s quality of life and achieve optimal therapeutic potential. Here, we describe the development and characterization of a nanoemulsion formulation of plumbagin. Nanoemulsions are kinetically stable, optically isotropic, biphasic dispersions of oil-in-water stabilized by an interfacial film of amphiphilic surfactant [18]. These nanoparticle systems have droplets within submicron size range, typically 5-200 nm. Nanoemulsions have multiple potential advantages for oral delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients, including high encapsulation capacity for poorly water soluble drugs, robust stability to separation, flocculation and coalescence, and potentially improved absorption and bioavailability of encapsulated drugs [19, 20]. We have formulated nanoemulsions using biocompatible components, with oleic acid as an oil phase and polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monooleate (polysorbate 80) as an emulsifier. High plumbagin-loading capacity, kinetics of release in simulated physiological environments, and enhancement of antiproliferative activity toward prostate cancer cells suggest that oleic-acid based nanoemulsion formulation of plumbagin is a suitable delivery system.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Materials
Plumbagin, polysorbate 80, oleic acid and all other chemicals were supplied by Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise stated.
2.2. Preparation of Plumbagin-Loaded Nanoemulsion
To find the optimal composition for a formulation of plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions, series of samples with increasing concentrations of surfactant were processed by high-pressure homogenization. Briefly, coarse emulsions of oleic acid (10% w/w) saturated with plumbagin, prepared in 0.25-4.0% (w/w) polysorbate 80 in deionized water, were homogenized using high speed homogenizer (Biospec Products, Inc.) at 30,000 rpm for 5 min. Emulsions were then processed by high-pressure homogenization using pneumatically controlled EmulsiFlex-C3 (Avestin) 10 cycles at 5000 psi.
2.3. Particle Size Analysis
Nanoemulsion formulations at the time of production and at different time points afterwards were analyzed for particle size distribution and polydispersity by dynamic light scattering (DLS) method using noninvasive back scatter (NIBS) detection at 173° angle and at 25°C on Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments) equipped with 4 mW He-Ne, 633 nm laser.
2.4. Physical Stability of Nanoemulsions
Plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions were evaluated for any particle size change over time, or after incubation in 0.1M HCl or 0.01M sodium phosphate buffer pH 6.8 or pH 7.5, simulating physiological conditions. Particle size distribution was analyzed at designated time-points using Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Malvern Instruments) as described above.
2.5. In Vitro Drug Release
In vitro plumbagin release from nanoemulsion formulation was performed using membrane dialysis (MW cutoff 8-10 kDa) against simulated gastric fluid (0.1M HCl, 0.05% (w/v) Tween 80) or simulated intestinal fluid (0.01M sodium phosphate buffer pH 7.5, 0.05% (w/v) Tween 80) at 37°C. At designed time intervals, the concentration of plumbagin was determined by UV-VIS spectrometry from four independent measurements (n=4) as described below. To analyze kinetics of release, the data were fitted by one phase exponential nonlinear regression using GraphPad PRISM 6.
2.6. Determination of Plumbagin Concentration
Concentration of plumbagin in nanoemulsions was estimated by UV-VIS spectrophotometry. Briefly, nanoemulsions were dispersed in methanol (200-3000 X dilution) vortexed for 10 sec and then concentration of plumbagin was determined spectrophotometrically (DU-640, Beckman Coulter) at 410 nm (ελ = 3,800 dm3.mol−1.cm−1).
2.7. Cell Culture
PTEN-P2 murine prostate cancer cells were kindly provided by the Wu laboratory and have been previously described [21]. The cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, insulin-selenium-transferrin (5 μg/ml insulin), and M dihydrotestosterone. Cultures were passaged by dissociation using trypsin (0.05%) and maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.
2.8. In Vitro Cytotoxicity Assay
The antiproliferative properties of plumbagin nanoemulsion were examined by MTS tetrazolium compound (Owen’s reagent) based assay. Briefly, the PTEN-P2 cells were plated at density of 8 × 103 cells per well of 96-well plates in four replicates. 24 h later, the medium was replaced with medium containing increasing concentration of plumbagin or nanoemulsion formulation of plumbagin corresponding to the range of 0-10 uM plumbagin. Control nanoemulsion formulation without drug was tested at the same concentration range but without plumbagin. After 24 h exposure, the cytotoxicity was determined using a CellTiter 96AQueous on solution cell proliferation assay (MTS) kit according to manufacturer’s instructions (Promega, Madison, WI) by measuring conversion of (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium, inner salt) to formazan product. IC50 values were then determined from cytotoxicity curves as a concentration that induced 50% inhibition of the cell growth.
2.9. Data Analysis
Particle size (Z-average, intensity-weighted mean size) and polydispersity index (PDI) were determined by method of cumulants (defined by ISO standards 13321 and 22412) of autocorrelation function generated by DLS instrument. Drug release and cytotoxicity studies were performed in replicates (n=4) and the %cumulative release and %cytotoxicity values are expressed as means from these measurements with corresponding standard deviations.
3. Results
3.1. Formulation of Plumbagin-Loaded Nanoemulsions
Our preformulatory tests of various excipients identified oleic acid to be a good solubilizer of plumbagin (51.8 mg/ml at 25°C). Therefore, we proceeded to optimize the formulation of plumbagin nanoemulsions using oleic acid as the oil phase. Dispersions of oleic acid saturated with plumbagin were generated by high-pressure homogenization of coarse emulsions with variable contents of polysorbate 80 as surfactant. Particle size analysis by DLS showed a decrease of hydrodynamic diameter with increasing concentration of surfactant, as indicated by intensity-based particle size distribution profiles (Figure 2). Dispersions with concentrations of polysorbate 80 equal to or less than 0.5% (w/w) showed high polydispersity index as also indicated by the wide range of particle size distribution (Figure 3). Furthermore, these dispersions were unstable over time, showing multimodal distribution patterns with presence of particles with a diameter higher than 1000 nm (Figure 3). Progressive increase in surfactant concentration above 1.0% (w/w) stabilized dispersions. Nanoemulsions with surfactant content in the range of 1.0-3.5% (w/w) showed narrow particle size distribution profiles and high stability over time (Figure 3). Dispersions with higher concentrations of polysorbate 80 (4.0% w/w) showed the smallest average radius, although we observed the presence of ~ 30 nm surfactant micelles in these formulations. Therefore, a surfactant content in the range of 1.0-3.5% yielded uniform plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions with an average particle size that can be controlled by the concentration of surfactant during high-pressure homogenization.
3.2. Stability of Nanoemulsions
Nanoemulsions with narrow polydispersity and diameter (Z-average, 135 nm, 3.5% (w/w) polysorbate 80) were selected for further characterization. This formulation of plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions and the same formulation without plumbagin showed nearly identical particle size immediately after preparation (Figure 4). Both plumbagin-loaded and control (empty) nanoemulsions showed good retention of size distribution over three months of storage at 25°C (Figure 4), with only a moderate increase of diameter of the plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions. Furthermore, both the control nanoemulsion and the plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion, when dispersed in acidic media that simulate the physiological environment of stomach acid and intestinal fluids, showed retention of particle size (Table 1). A moderate increase in the hydrodynamic diameter of both empty- and plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions was observed in the slightly alkaline environment of phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) (Table 1).
3.3. In Vitro Release of Plumbagin
The plumbagin-loaded formulation (Z-average, 135 nm) was further studied for in vitro release in media mimicking physiological conditions: simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and simulated intestinal fluid (SIF). The plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion showed a one phase exponential release profile of plumbagin with a half-life of 6.1 h in simulated gastric fluid (SGF) and 7.0 h in simulated intestinal fluid (SIF) (Figure 5). Release trends showed a slightly higher span and plateau for SIF compared to SGF, corresponding to the higher ionization of the phenolic hydroxyl group of plumbagin leading to facilitated release in media with higher pH.
3.4. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Plumbagin-Loaded Nanoemulsion
The antiproliferative effect of the plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion formulation was evaluated using prostate cancer PTEN-P2 cells in vitro. Plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion and free plumbagin inhibited PTEN-P2 proliferation in dose-dependent manner. However, the plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion showed increased cytotoxicity toward PTEN-P2 cells compared to free plumbagin, IC50(μM) 3.1 versus 4.3 after 24 hr exposure (Figure 6). These observations correspond to microscopic assessment, where plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion apparently caused more cellular damage to PTEN-P2 cells compared to free plumbagin (Figure 7). Besides a decrease in cell density, morphological changes included cell detachment and shrinkage (Figure 7). Control nanoemulsions without plumbagin did not show significant cytotoxicity (Figures 6 and 7).
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
4. Discussion
It is well recognized that the aqueous solubility of a drug is a fundamental property that controls the rate and extent of its absorption and bioavailability [17]. Therefore, as a limiting factor of bioavailability, it essentially influences the pharmacokinetic profile and the pharmacodynamics of the drug after oral administration. Since the majority of the drug candidates in drug discovery show poor aqueous solubility [22], this is a significant challenge. To address this issue, several approaches have been developed, including formulation of poorly soluble drugs in nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems (polymeric micelles, liposomes, nanoemulsions, solid lipid nanoparticles, etc.). Among these, nanoemulsions provide the documented advantage of increased absorption and bioavailability, enhanced penetration via biological membranes, and lower inter- and intraindividual variability in drug pharmacokinetics [19, 20].
We have generated plumbagin-loaded oleic-acid based nanoemulsions using high pressure homogenization of oleic acid emulsion with polysorbate 80 as emulsifying agent. Polysorbate 80, a nonionic surfactant with a high hydrophilic-lipophilic balance (HLB=15.0), was chosen to ensure immediate formation of oil-in-water droplets during production. Depending on surfactant content (1.0-3.5% (w/w)), the high pressure homogenization process yielded plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions with stable size distribution profiles in the range of 135-220 nm. High pressure homogenization methodology is implemented on a large scale in the pharmaceutical industry and established procedures will provide a distinctive advantage when production of higher quantities of nanoemulsions is needed.
The plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion (135 nm Z-average, 10% (w/w) oleic acid, 3.5% (w/w) polysorbate 80) which had a good retention of size distribution over time and polydispersity was selected for further studies of drug release, stability in simulated physiological fluids, and in vitro cytotoxicity against prostate cancer cells. The plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion showed good retention of nanoparticle size after dispersion in water or media simulating physiological environment. Furthermore, drug release studies showed exponential release of plumbagin from nanoemulsion with half-lives that would permit optimal absorption of plumbagin from the gastrointestinal tract. Plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion exhibited higher antiproliferative activity on PTEN-P2 cells compared to free plumbagin. Of note, there is no reason to think that plumbagin released from the nanoemulsion would act differently in prostate cancer cells compared to other types of cancer cells; therefore it is expected that once released, plumbagin will have the same effects as have been extensively described in the literature. Increased cytotoxicity of plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsion was not due to an additive effect, because the control nanoemulsion (without plumbagin) did not show apparent cytotoxicity at the equivalent dose of components. Therefore, the increased cytotoxicity of plumbagin in the nanoemulsion formulation could be attributed either to increased cellular uptake of plumbagin in the nanoparticulate form or to a stabilizing effect of nanoemulsions on plumbagin or both. The high particle surface area [20] associated with small diameter of nanodispersion (surface to mass ratio) could lead to increased reactivity with cellular surface and thus increased uptake of plumbagin by PTEN-P2 cells. Moreover, plumbagin as an electrophilic compound has a propensity to react with various nucleophiles in the extracellular environment. The shielding of plumbagin in the hydrophobic core of the nanoemulsion would therefore decrease its exposure and potential interaction with nucleophiles before reaching cellular targets. This stabilizing effect would be expected to improve the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic behavior of plumbagin when administered using a nanoemulsion formulation.
The nanoemulsion described here was formulated using oil and surfactant components that are biocompatible and generally recognized as safe (GRAS). Additionally, the oleic acid is an FDA-approved excipient and penetration enhancer. High loading capacity for active pharmaceutical ingredient of interest (plumbagin), retention of nanoparticle size over time, kinetics of plumbagin release under simulated physiological conditions, and antiproliferative activity all indicate that the oleic acid-based nanoemulsion formulation is a promising drug delivery system for plumbagin.
Abbreviations
| DLS: | Dynamic light scattering |
| HLB: | Hydrophilic-lipophilic balance |
| S: | Surfactant |
| NE: | Nanoemulsions |
| NE-PL: | Plumbagin-loaded nanoemulsions |
| PDI: | Polydispersity index |
| PLBG: | Plumbagin |
| SGF: | Simulated gastric fluid |
| SIF: | Simulated intestinal fluid. |
Data Availability
All data are available at Vaccine Research Institute of San Diego, San Diego Science Center, San Diego, CA.
Disclosure
Neither the funding agency nor any outside organization has participated in study design or has any conflicts of interest. Pellficure Pharmaceuticals, Inc., had final approval of the manuscript.
Conflicts of Interest
Borgström P, Chrastina A, and Baron VT are inventors on a patent in relation to this work. Borgström P is also CEO of PellFiCure Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Chrastina A and Baron VT are consultants for PellFiCure Pharmaceuticals, Inc.