Prospects of IL-2 in Cancer Immunotherapy

Choudhry, Hani; Helmi, Nawal; Abdulaal, Wesam H.; Zeyadi, Mustafa; Zamzami, Mazin A.; Wu, Wei; Mahmoud, Maged Mostafa; Warsi, Mohiuddin Khan; Rasool, Mahmood; Jamal, Mohammad S.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9056173

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conflicts of Interest References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 | Article ID 9056173 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9056173

Prospects of IL-2 in Cancer Immunotherapy

Hani Choudhry,¹Nawal Helmi,¹Wesam H. Abdulaal,¹Mustafa Zeyadi,¹Mazin A. Zamzami,¹Wei Wu,²Maged Mostafa Mahmoud,^3,4Mohiuddin Khan Warsi,⁵Mahmood Rasool,⁶and Mohammad S. Jamal³

Academic Editor: Hannes Stockinger

Received13 Dec 2017

Revised25 Feb 2018

Accepted29 Mar 2018

Published06 May 2018

Abstract

IL-2 is a powerful immune growth factor and it plays important role in sustaining T cell response. The potential of IL-2 in expanding T cells without loss of functionality has led to its early use in cancer immunotherapy. IL-2 has been reported to induce complete and durable regressions in cancer patients but immune related adverse effects have been reported (irAE). The present review discusses the prospects of IL-2 in immunotherapy for cancer.

1. Introduction

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) was identified in the supernatants of activated T cells over three decades ago [1, 2]. IL-2 is the first cytokine for which receptor component was cloned [3, 4]. IL-2 is a four α-helical bundle cytokine of 15.5 kDa size. It is mainly produced by CD4+ T cells as a result of antigen stimulation response [5]. However, to some extent, IL-2 is also produced by NK T cells [6], CD8+ cells [7], mast cells [8], and dendritic cells (DCs) [9]. IL-2 possesses potent T cell growth factor action. It can also induce natural killer (NK) cells and potentiate their cytolytic effect and promote many other immune system components which are required for the removal of autoreactive cells and maintenance of homeostasis [10]. In the last two decades, the potential of IL-2 to expand T cells without affecting its activity has led to identification of its potential as an immunotherapeutic agent against cancer. The IL-2 administration is reported to induce apparently curative and durable regressions in cancer patients. In 1988, UFDA approved IL-2 for therapy of metastatic melanoma and then in 1992 for renal cell cancer. Further research also led to evolution of cell transfer therapies having promising response against melanoma cases [11]. This review discusses scope of IL-2 in the immunotherapy of cancer and major challenge in the development of IL-2 based therapeutic approach as well as perspective on future research.

2. IL-2 Receptor and Signaling

IL-2 is a T cell-derived common cytokine. It plays vital role in growth as well as differentiation of T cells, B cells, natural killer cells, and many other cell types [12]. The signaling pathway of IL-2 is mediated by a selective receptor family [13], which includes three classes of cell surface receptors: the alpha , beta , and gamma chains. The dimeric low affinity IL-2 receptor consists of the γ and β chains and is expressed on T cells and NK cells. The high affinity IL-2 receptor consisting of the α, β, and γ chains is expressed on Tregs and activated T cells [14, 15]. The activated lymphocytes also express these high affinity receptors. The low and high affinity IL-2 receptors are expressed in steady state. The transcription of IL-2R is induced by various factors. Transcription of IL-2R is induced on T cells which are activated by TCR or IL-2 on T cells. Transcription of IL-2R is induced by various factors. Transcription of IL-2R is induced on T cells which are activated by TCR or IL-2 [16]. IL-2R transcription is also induced by intermediate affinity receptors upon binding of IL-2 and as a response to T cell activation. There is also rapid formation of high affinity receptors and consequent increase in responsiveness to IL-2.

Expression of IL-2R chain is also induced by IL-2 on T cells [23]. These cells also have γ chain expression but it is less inducible than IL-2R or IL-2R [24]. IL-2Rα is also expressed by NK cells, B cells, mature dendritic cells (DCs), and endothelial cells [25–28]. This binding also promotes cytolytic activity and cell growth [29].

IL-2 presented in trans and bound to cellular IL-2R can also activate another cell having IL-2R and chain expression [30]. However, it should be noted that the affinity with which IL-2 can bind to IL-2R is relatively low with rapid on and off rates.

IL-2 binding to IL-2R or IL-2R complex initiates signal transduction for the transcription of target genes through multiple signaling pathways. These include Janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) AKT pathway, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway (Figure 1). All of these three major pathways mediate the effect of IL-2 on cell proliferation, activation, differentiation, survival, and cytokine production in the immune cells [31, 32].

3. Cancer Immunotherapy Using IL-2

It has been long established that the immune system can be harnessed against neoplastic cells. However, IL-2 was the first cytokines to be successfully used in the treatment of cancer. This was because it can promote T cells as well as NK cells. IL-2 can induce T cell proliferation and differentiation and also cause its activation. The complexing IL-2 with anti-IL-2 mAbs has ability to potentiate signaling via the intermediate affinity CD122/CD132 receptor in vivo. Kamimura and Bevan examined the effect of treatment of naive CD8+ T cells with IL-2 signals in vivo. Extensive division was observed in T cell upon treatment of the host animals with IL-2 and anti-IL-2 complexes in the absence of any other stimulation. The potent IL-2 signals caused proliferation and differentiation of naive CD8+ T cells into functional memory cells having conventional central memory phenotype [33].

Further, lymphokine activated killer (LAK) cells represent a unique and fundamental cytotoxic effector system plays a role in immune surveillance against NK resistant solid tumor cells and has role in the adoptive immunotherapy. LAK cells are a heterogeneous mixture of ex vivo expanded and activated T, NK, and NKT cells which display major histocompatibility complex (MHC) nonrestricted cytotoxicity that do not rely on HLA-mediated recognition of tumor targets. LAK cells can recognize and kill human cancer cells as well as cultured tumor cell lines without any need for further in vitro stimulation [34]. In vitro grown LAK cells have also demonstrated in vivo activity against tumor-bearing mice. However, in all these studies, the tumors were treated before vascularization [35]. Further, clinical trials using LAK cells and recombinant LAK cells conducted in 30 patients with advanced cancer did not produce any antitumor response [36]. Later, studies in murine models showed that in vivo activity of LAK cells was increased by administration of IL-2. Based on this observation, the attempts were made to administer LAK cells in combination with maximum tolerated dose of IL-2 in humans. Recombinant interleukin-2 (IL-2) therapy was first tried in 1984 and its novel effects in regulating regulatory T cells apart from effector T cells were identified after its FDA approval [37]. In one of the first studies, in case of metastatic renal cell cancer, ten patients (7%) exhibited complete regression whereas partial regression was observed in twenty (approximately 13%). In case of metastatic melanoma, nine patients (7%) achieved complete regression. Complete remission was seen in 15 cases for seven months to as long as ninety-one months [17]. Further, the therapy showed durable effect with ongoing complete responses over a duration of 39 to 148 months [38]. A few other clinical studies have also demonstrated safety of infusing autologous leukocytes in high-grade glioma patients with local injection of LAK cells. Outcomes of the studies in terms of prolonging disease free survival are also promising. However, comparison of therapy of IL-2 alone with combination of IL-2 with LAK cell has not shown any significant difference in response to renal cell carcinoma in clinical setting [39, 40].

The durability of the response which occurs due to development of T cell memory appears to be most important feature of cancer immunotherapy.

Recent studies showed that immunization with combination of IL-2 and an altered peptide ligand derived from gp100 (melanoma associated protein) has better overall clinical response. In this case, the progression-free survival was of relatively longer duration than IL-2 treatment alone. This observation was in line with the idea that IL-2 can not only maintain but also enhance the tumor reactive T cells. However, as evident from the results, the treatment was effective on fraction of patients [19]. More recently, better IL-2 based cell transfer therapies with effective response in melanoma have been developed. Further, genetic modification of T cells with TCRs or chimeric Ag receptors encoding gene and administration of these cells after expansion in IL-2 have opened the scope for use of cell transfer therapy in other cancer types [11].

The immunotherapy approach causes development of lifelong immunologic memory and consequent durable response. However, the questions that need to be addressed include the evaluation of survival benefits and the scope for possible retreatment. To answer these questions, much larger clinical trials with extended follow-up period should be conducted.

Outcome of trials using combination of IL-2 and interferon have found it to be nonsuperior to high dose IL-2 as a single agent [41–43]. Large trials on biochemotherapy involving combination of chemotherapeutic agent with IL-2 several large trials have consistently shown better overall response rates with early clinical benefit as compared with chemotherapy [44–47]. However, early response and benefit do not affect overall survival due to short duration of response [48, 49]. Maintenance biotherapy after induction of biochemotherapy has been tried to extend the response, but with limited success [50]. The exact mechanism of toxicity due to combination of IL-2 with interferon or chemotherapeutic agents is complex and yet to be fully understood [51]. Patients sometime require interruption or discontinuation because of toxicity [17, 52]. The toxicities due to treatment with IL-2 alone are both predictable and manageable. Further, toxicity in this case tapers off quickly following therapy [48, 53]. In spite of this, biochemotherapy remains an option in cases of disease with rapid progression.

4. Dual Effect of IL-2: Major Challenge in the Development of Promising Immunotherapy

The major challenge in the development of IL-2 as a therapeutic antitumor agent is that IL-2 can act on both T cells and Tregs. Thus, reports on use of IL-2 have used two different strategies, one to reduce the autoimmune responses and another to augment immune responses against tumor (Table 1). Recently, studies have used IL-2 in low dose, either alone or in combination, to induce preferential activation of Tregs. Tregs having high affinity for IL-2 can compete more effectively for it at low IL-2 levels [54]. Few studies involving HCV induced vasculitis and Graft-Versus-Host Disease showed improvement in clinical outcome based on the described concept of IL-2 therapy using low doses. However, in the study involving renal cancer and melanoma, subjects which were given high dose of IL-2 showed limited efficacy due to increased Treg level [18, 22, 55]. Development of somewhat lethal toxicity is another major limitation of therapy with IL-2 at high doses. Also, IL-2 has a very short life in systemic delivery. Attempts made to reduce the side effects by lowering dose resulted in marked loss of therapeutic effect due to dominant effect of immunosuppressive Treg cell leading to poor outcomes in cancer patients [18]. Further studies are needed to explore the dual effect of IL-2 in cancer therapy. The translation of effect of IL-2 on Tregs and effector cell from preclinical to clinical setting is not always predictable [56, 57]. This is so because there are a number of factors influencing the outcome in clinical condition (e.g., genetic variability, disease factor, and most importantly the variation in Tregs and effector cells immune response in individuals). There is also an unmet need for better biomarkers which can be used to predict the response of IL-2 immunotherapy and hence can predict factors like genetic polymorphisms or serum proteins or antigen expression. This can also lead to development of a more personalized therapy approach based on the individual characteristics of patient especially the ones who are expected to benefit from IL-2 therapy.

5. Future Perspective of IL-2 Based Immunotherapy

IL-2 was one of the first cytokines exploited for development of tumor immunotherapy. However, the contrasting action of IL-2 has led to confusing response and limited the development of IL-2 for tumor immunotherapy. Further, the delivery of IL-2 has been associated with multiple side effects, further affecting its utility in clinical setting. Development of IL-15 for cancer immunotherapy was initiated in the last decade and it was viewed as a safer successor to IL-2-based immunotherapies since both cytokines have shared receptor subunits and activated similar downstream pathways. Preclinical data suggested IL-15 to be safer alternative to IL-2 immunotherapy [58]. However, translational challenges and issues in delivery affected its clinical development [58]. However, recently Nektar Therapeutics has developed a memory T cell stimulating cytokine, NKTR255, which causes long-term T cell activation through IL-15 pathway. According to the company, it has been found to improve the quality of T cell memory response to treat cancer. Through optimal engagement of the, NKTR-255 stimulates proliferation and survival of CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells through optimal engagement of IL-15R/IL-2R receptor complex and induces long-term immunological memory for sustained antitumor immune response [59]. Recently a complex between a novel human IL-15 superagonist variant and a human IL-15R sushi domain-Fc fusion protein, termed ALT-803, has been created. ALT-803 showed promising immunostimulatory activity and antimyeloma activity in mouse model with relatively longer half-life than IL-15 and wide therapeutic dose range. The potent immunostimulatory activity of ALT-803 is also attributed to its prolonged retention in lymphoid organs compared to IL-15 [60, 61].

Development of better understanding of immune responses of IL-2 can open new windows for developing better immunotherapy. Many strategies are being developed to improve efficacy, while reducing the toxicity of IL-2 therapy. The recent evidence suggests that genetic variation plays an important role in defining the clinical output of immunotherapy. Some studies have identified functional polymorphism as a reason for poor response to therapies [62, 63]. Further exploration of polymorphism in IL-2 gene can help in elucidation of clinical response. Efforts have also been focused on development of mutant form of IL-2 with preferential binding to different IL-2R. This has potential to bypass interaction of IL-2 with other subtypes of receptors [64]. This strategy has been tried as part of Phase I study against cases of renal cancer and advanced melanoma [65]. Mutational approaches to construct IL-2 mutants with varying binding affinities for components of the IL-2 receptor have been tried in few reports. This includes strategy to enhance binding to IL-2R chain. The objective is to improve IL-2 efficacy based on the fact that effect T cells have relatively higher expression of chain. On the contrary, alternate strategy is to employ creation of mutants having impaired binding to chain. This can help in reducing expression of NK cells which have higher expression while retaining the property for effector T cell stimulation [66–69]. One study used IL-2 mutants having enhanced binding to chain. The residues in the mutant IL-2 caused conformation effect in IL-2 leading to improved binding to the β chain. One of the mutants is known as “superkine” due to its enhanced agonistic effect. This superkine also exhibited relatively improved antitumor activity with relatively lesser side effects compared to systemic IL-2 therapy [70]. Improvement of half-life of IL-2 is another important aspect for improving development of effective IL-2 based immunotherapy. This can greatly reduce the dose of IL-2, while leaving a positive shift in clinical outcome [71]. Combination of IL-2 with monoclonal antibodies is also being utilized as a new approach in cancer immunotherapy. It can be used for targeted approach against specific cells based on the affinity of their IL-2R. The immunocytokines, namely, antibody-cytokine fusion proteins, have already been tested in preclinical cancer models [29]. Sockolosky et al. have recently developed engineered IL-2 cytokine-receptor orthogonal (ortho) pairs that interact with one another. This ortho IL-2 transmits native IL-2 signals but does not interact with their natural cytokine and receptor counterparts since it lacks detectable binding to IL-2. Ortho IL-2 pairs showed good efficacy as in mouse model of adoptive cell therapy [72].

IL2 immunotherapy, being effective treatment option, is associated with various toxicities. Developing predictive biomarker can help optimize selection of appropriate patient population which is likely to be most benefited from therapy. Recently, Kuzman et al. have shown the positive relation between Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and response to high dose interleukin-2 in patients with renal cell carcinoma [73]. Identification of more selective biomarkers for IL-2 immunotherapy against various cancer types can lead to extension of benefits of IL-2 immunotherapy in a cost effective manner while limiting its toxicity in larger population.

There are still a number of issues that should be addressed for successful translation of IL-2 therapy in clinical setting. These include optimization of dose of mutants and other IL-2 based regimens, the peripheral effects and immunogenicity of the new molecules. Future therapy will not only depend on IL-2 alone but a combination of measures including other immunologic options, like antibody treatments and active vaccinations. Determination of optimum combinations/approach using the massive research data being generated at a fast pace should yield greater clinical benefits in future.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

O. Boyman and J. Sprent, “The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 180–190, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Waldmann, Y. Tagaya, and R. Bamford, “Interleukin-2, interleukin-15, and their receptors,” International Reviews of Immunology, vol. 16, no. 3-4, pp. 205–226, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Taniguchi, H. Matsui, T. Fujita et al., “Structure and expression of a cloned cDNA for human interleukin-2,” Nature, vol. 302, no. 5906, pp. 305–310, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Nikaido, A. Shimizu, N. Ishida et al., “Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding human interleukin-2 receptor,” Nature, vol. 311, no. 5987, pp. 631–635, 1984.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Leonard, “Cytokines and immunodeficiency diseases,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 200–208, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Yui, L. L. Sharp, W. L. Havran, and E. V. Rothenberg, “Preferential activation of an IL-2 regulatory sequence transgene in TCRγδ and NKT cells: subset-specific differences in IL-2 regulation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 8, pp. 4691–4699, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Paliard, R. de Waal, H. Malefijt et al., “Simultaneous production of IL-2, IL-4, and IFN-gamma by activated human CD4+ and CD8+ T cell clones,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 849–855, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
A. Y. Hershko, R. Suzuki, N. Charles et al., “Mast cell interleukin-2 production contributes to suppression of chronic allergic dermatitis,” Immunity, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 562–571, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Granucci, C. Vizzardelli, N. Pavelka et al., “Inducible IL-2 production by dendritic cells revealed by global gene expression analysis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 2, no. 9, pp. 882–888, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Almança, S. V. Saldanha, D. R. Sousa et al., “Toxicological evaluation of acute and sub-chronic ingestion of hydroalcoholic extract of Solanum cernuum Vell. in mice,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 508–512, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Rosenberg, “IL-2: the first effective immunotherapy for human cancer,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 12, pp. 5451–5458, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Cacalano and J. A. Johnston, “Interleukin-2 signaling and inherited immunodeficiency,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 287–293, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. J. Robb, A. Munck, and K. A. Smith, “T cell growth factor receptors: Quantitation, specificity, and biological relevance,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 154, no. 5, pp. 1455–1474, 1981.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Stauber, E. W. Debler, P. A. Horton, K. A. Smith, and I. A. Wilson, “Crystal structure of the IL-2 signaling complex: Paradigm for a heterotrimeric cytokine receptor,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 8, pp. 2788–2793, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Wang, M. Rickert, and K. C. Garcia, “Structural biology: Structure of the quaternary complex of interleukin-2 with its α, β and γc receptors,” Science, vol. 310, no. 5751, pp. 1159–1163, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Depper, W. J. Leonard, C. Drogula, M. Krönke, T. A. Waldmann, and W. C. Greene, “Interleukin 2 (IL-2) augments transcription of the IL-2 receptor gene,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 82, no. 12, pp. 4230–4234, 1985.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Rosenberg, J. C. Yang, S. L. Topalian et al., “Treatment of 283 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal cell cancer using high-dose bolus interleukin 2,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 271, no. 12, pp. 907–913, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ahmadzadeh and S. A. Rosenberg, “IL-2 administration increases CD4+CD25hi Foxp3 + regulatory T cells in cancer patients,” Blood, vol. 107, no. 6, pp. 2409–2414, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Schwartzentruber, D. H. Lawson, J. M. Richards et al., “gp100 peptide vaccine and interleukin-2 in patients with advanced melanoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 364, no. 22, pp. 2119–2127, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. I. Clark, M. K. K. Wong, H. L. Kaufman et al., “Impact of sequencing targeted therapies with high-dose interleukin-2 immunotherapy: an analysis of outcome and survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma from an on-going Observational IL-2 clinical trial: PROCLAIMSM,” Clinical Genitourinary Cancer, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 31–41.e4, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Koreth, K. Matsuoka, H. T. Kim et al., “Interleukin-2 and regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 22, pp. 2055–2066, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Saadoun, M. Rosenzwajg, F. Joly et al., “Regulatory T-cell responses to low-dose interleukin-2 in HCV-induced vasculitis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 22, pp. 2067–2077, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Siegel, M. Sharon, P. L. Smith, and W. J. Leonard, “The IL-2 receptor β chain (p70): Role in mediating signals for LAK, NK, and proliferative activities,” Science, vol. 238, no. 4823, pp. 75–78, 1987.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Cao, C. A. Kozak, Y. J. Liu, M. Noguchi, E. O'Connell, and W. J. Leonard, “Characterization of cDNAs encoding the murine interleukin 2 receptor (IL-2R) gamma chain: chromosomal mapping and tissue specificity of IL-2R gamma chain expression,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 18, pp. 8464–8468, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Brisslert, M. Bokarewa, P. Larsson, K. Wing, L. V. Collins, and A. Tarkowski, “Phenotypic and functional characterization of human CD25+ B cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 548–557, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Krieg, S. Létourneau, G. Pantaleo, and O. Boyman, “Improved IL-2 immunotherapy by selective stimulation of IL-2 receptors on lymphocytes and endothelial cells,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 26, pp. 11906–11911, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Y. Rudensky, “Regulatory T cells and Foxp3,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 241, no. 1, pp. 260–268, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhang, S. Sun, I. Hwang, D. F. Tough, and J. Sprent, “Potent and selective stimulation of memory-phenotype CD8⁺ T cells in vivo by IL-15,” Immunity, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 591–599, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Liao, J.-X. Lin, and W. J. Leonard, “Interleukin-2 at the crossroads of effector responses, tolerance, and immunotherapy,” Immunity, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Wuest, J. H. Edwan, J. F. Martin et al., “A role for interleukin-2 trans-presentation in dendritic cell-mediated T cell activation in humans, as revealed by daclizumab therapy,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 604–609, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Rickert, X. Wang, M. J. Boulanger, N. Goriatcheva, and K. C. Garcia, “Structural Biology: The structure of interleukin-2 complexed with its alpha receptor,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5727, pp. 1477–1480, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. C. Sim and L. Radvanyi, “The IL-2 cytokine family in cancer immunotherapy,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 377–390, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Kamimura and M. J. Bevan, “Naive CD8+ T cells differentiate into protective memory-like cells after IL-2-anti-IL-2 complex treatment in vivo,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 204, no. 8, pp. 1803–1812, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Grimm, K. M. Ramsey, A. Mazumder, D. J. Wilson, J. Y. Djeu, and S. A. Rosenberg, “Lymphokine-activated killer cell phenomenon II. Precursor phenotype is serologically distinct from peripheral T lymphocytes, memory cytotoxic thymus-derived lymphocytes, and natural killer cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 884–897, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. E. Ettinghausen and S. A. Rosenberg, “Immunotherapy of murine sarcomas using lymphokine activated killer cells: optimization of the schedule and route of administration of recombinant interleukin-2,” Cancer Research, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 2784–2792, 1986.
View at: Google Scholar
M. T. Lotze, B. R. Line, D. J. Mathisen, and S. A. Rosenberg, “The in vivo distribution of autologous human and murine lymphoid cells grown in T cell growth factor (TCGF): Implications for the adoptive immunotherapy of tumors,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1487–1493, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
A. R. D. V. Chavez, W. Buchser, P. H. Basse et al., “Pharmacologic administration of interleukin-2: Inducing a systemic autophagic syndrome,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1182, pp. 14–27, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Rosenberg, J. C. Yang, D. E. White, and S. M. Steinberg, “Durability of complete responses in patients with metastatic cancer treated with high-dose interleukin-2: Identification of the antigens mediating response,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 307–319, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Ishikawa, S. Takano, T. Ohno, and K. Tsuboi, “Adoptive cell transfer therapy for malignant gliomas,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 746, pp. 109–120, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Law, R. J. Motzer, M. Mazumdar et al., “Phase III randomized trial of interleukin‐2 with or without lymphokine‐activated killer cells in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma,” Cancer, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 824–832, 1995.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. McDermott, M. M. Regan, J. I. Clark et al., “Randomized phase III trial of high-dose interleukin-2 versus subcutaneous interleukin-2 and interferon in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 133–141, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Atkins, J. Sparano, R. I. Fisher et al., “Randomized phase II trial of high-dose interleukin-2 either alone or in combination with interferon alfa-2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 661–670, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Negrier, B. Escudier, C. Lasset et al., “Recombinant human interleukin-2, recombinant human interferon alfa-2a, or both in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 338, no. 18, pp. 1272–1278, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Atkins, J. Hsu, S. Lee et al., “Phase III trial comparing concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, interleukin-2, and interferon alfa-2b with cisplatin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine alone in patients with metastatic malignant melanoma (E3695): a trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 26, no. 35, pp. 5748–5754, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. F. McDermott, J. W. Mier, D. P. Lawrence et al., “A phase II pilot trial of concurrent biochemotherapy with cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine, interleukin 2, and interferon α-2B in patients with metastatic melanoma,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 2201–2208, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Eton, S. S. Legha, A. Y. Bedikian et al., “Sequential biochemotherapy versus chemotherapy for metastatic melanoma: Results from a phase III randomized trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2045–2052, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Rosenberg, J. C. Yang, D. J. Schwartzentruber et al., “Prospective randomized trial of the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma using chemotherapy with cisplatin, dacarbazine, and tamoxifen alone or in combination with interleukin-2 and interferon alfa-2b,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 968–975, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Hamm, S. Verma, T. Petrella, K. Bak, and M. Charette, “Biochemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic malignant melanoma: A systematic review,” Cancer Treatment Reviews, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 145–156, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. J. Ives, R. L. Stowe, P. Lorigan, and K. Wheatley, “Chemotherapy compared with biochemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic melanoma: A meta-analysis of 18 trials involving 2,621 patients,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 25, no. 34, pp. 5426–5434, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. O'Day, P. D. Boasberg, L. Piro et al., “Maintenance biotherapy for metastatic melanoma with interleukin-2 and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor improves survival for patients responding to induction concurrent biochemotherapy,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 8, no. 9, pp. 2775–2781, 2002.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kim-Schulze, B. Taback, and H. L. Kaufman, “Cytokine therapy for cancer,” Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 793–818, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Guleria, J. C. Yang, S. L. Topalian et al., “Renal dysfunction associated with the administration of high-dose interleukin-2 in 199 consecutive patients with metastatic melanoma or renal carcinoma,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 2714–2722, 1994.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Rosenberg, M. T. Lotze, J. C. Yang et al., “Experience with the use of high-dose interleukin-2 in the treatment of 652 cancer patients,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 210, no. 4, pp. 474–485, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Long, M. Rieck, S. Sanda et al., “Rapamycin/IL-2 combination therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes augments Tregs yet transiently impairs β-cell function,” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 2340–2348, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-I. Matsuoka, J. Koreth, H. T. Kim et al., “Low-dose interleukin-2 therapy restores regulatory T cell homeostasis in patients with chronic graft-versus-host disease,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 5, no. 179, Article ID 179ra43, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Bluestone, “The Yin and Yang of interleukin-2-mediated immunotherapy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 365, no. 22, pp. 2129–2131, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Bonifacio, “Immunotherapy in type 1 diabetes: A shorter but more winding road?” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 9, pp. 2214-2215, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. C. Steel, T. A. Waldmann, and J. C. Morris, “Interleukin-15 biology and its therapeutic implications in cancer,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 35–41, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
NKTR-255: Nektar, http://www.nektar.com/pipeline/rd-pipeline/nktr-255.
W. Xu, M. Jones, B. Liu et al., “Efficacy and mechanism-of-action of a novel superagonist interleukin-15: Interleukin-15 receptor αSu/Fc fusion complex in syngeneic murine models of multiple myeloma,” Cancer Research, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 3075–3086, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. R. Rhode, J. O. Egan, W. Xu et al., “Comparison of the superagonist complex, ALT-803, to IL15 as cancer immunotherapeutics in animal models,” Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. de Paz, M. Alperi-López, F. J. Ballina-García, C. Prado, C. Gutiérrez, and A. Suárez, “Cytokines and regulatory T cells in rheumatoid arthritis and their relationship with response to corticosteroids,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 2502–2510, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. de Paz, M. Alperi-López, F. J. Ballina-García et al., “Interleukin 10 and tumor necrosis factor-α genotypes in rheumatoid arthritis—association with clinical response to glucocorticoids,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 503–511, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Margolin, M. B. Atkins, J. P. Dutcher et al., “Phase I trial of BAY 50-4798, an interleukin-2-specific agonist in advanced melanoma and renal cancer,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 3312–3319, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Pretto, G. Elia, N. Castioni, and D. Neri, “Preclinical evaluation of IL2-based immunocytokines supports their use in combination with dacarbazine, paclitaxel and TNF-based immunotherapy,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 901–910, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Rao, I. Driver, D. A. Lauffenburger, and K. D. Wittrup, “Interleukin 2 (IL-2) variants engineered for increased IL-2 receptor alpha-subunit affinity exhibit increased potency arising from a cell surface ligand reservoir effect,” Molecular Pharmacology, vol. 66, no. 4, pp. 864–869, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
B. M. Rao, I. Driver, D. A. Lauffenburger, and K. D. Wittrup, “High-affinity CD25-binding IL-2 mutants potently stimulate persistent T cell growth,” Biochemistry, vol. 44, no. 31, pp. 10696–10701, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. M. Rao, A. T. Girvin, T. Ciardelli, D. A. Lauffenburger, and K. D. Wittrup, “Interleukin-2 mutants with enhanced α-receptor subunit binding affinity,” Protein Engineering, Design and Selection, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1081–1087, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. B. Shanafelt, Y. Lin, M.-C. Shanafelt et al., “A T-cell-selective interleukin 2 mutein exhibits potent antitumor activity and is well tolerated in vivo,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 1197–1202, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Levin, D. L. Bates, A. M. Ring et al., “Exploiting a natural conformational switch to engineer an interleukin-2 ‘superkine’,” Nature, vol. 484, no. 7395, pp. 529–533, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Wilson, J. T. Pesce, T. R. Ramalingam, R. W. Thompson, A. Cheever, and T. A. Wynn, “Suppression of murine allergic airway disease by IL-2:anti-IL-2 monoclonal antibody-induced regulatory T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 181, no. 10, pp. 6942–6954, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Sockolosky, E. Trotta, G. Parisi et al., “Selective targeting of engineered T cells using orthogonal IL-2 cytokine-receptor complexes,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6379, pp. 1037–1042, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Kuzman, D. D. Stenehjem, J. Merriman et al., “Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive biomarker for response to high dose interleukin-2 in patients with renal cell carcinoma,” BMC Urology, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 1, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2018 Hani Choudhry et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

6115

Downloads

2481

Citations