Research Article | Open Access
Monika Fajfer, "New Species and Records of Scale Mites (Acariformes: Pterygosomatidae) from Geckos (Squamata: Gekkonidae and Caprodactylidae)", BioMed Research International, vol. 2018, Article ID 9290308, 8 pages, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9290308
New Species and Records of Scale Mites (Acariformes: Pterygosomatidae) from Geckos (Squamata: Gekkonidae and Caprodactylidae)
Two new species of pterygosomatid mites parasitizing geckos of the families Gekkonidae and Caprodactylidae are described: Geckobia africana n. sp. from Cnemaspis africana (Werner) from Tanzania and Geckobia milii n. sp. from Underwoodisaurus milii (Bory De Saint-Vincent) from Australia. The former species is the most similar to Geckobia loricata Berlese, 1892, but differs by the presence of the propodonotal shield reduced to small platelets, slender and blunt-pointed setae in the posterolateral part of the idiosomal venter and the absence of thick serrate ventral setae in posterior part of the idiosoma. For the latter species and Geckobia simplex Hirst, 1926, a new species group is established based on the analysis of chaetotaxy of legs I–IV. Mites of this new species group differ from the indica group by the presence of five setae on tibiae I–III and setae l’GI, l”GIV, dFI, dFII, and lFIII. Species of the genus Geckobia are recorded from hosts of the genera Cnemaspis Strauch and Underwoodisaurus Wermuth for the first time.
Mites of the family Pterygosomatidae Oudemans, 1910 (Acariformes: Prostigmata), are one of the most diverse group of permanent parasites of reptiles. They are represented by highly specific (mono- or stenoxeous) ectoparasites of lizards (Squamata: Sauria), with the exception of Geckobia enigmatica Bertrand and Pedrono, 2000, found on tortoises (Testudines: Testudinidae) , and species of the genus Pimeliaphilus Trägårdh, 1905, found on terrestrial arthropods . To date, the family Pterygosomatidae includes 182 species grouped into nine genera recorded from all zoogeographical regions, except for the Antarctica [3, 4].
Within the Pterygosomatidae the genus Geckobia Mégnin, 1878, is the most species-rich with 73 species and subspecies. About two-thirds of the species are arranged into four species groups based on a trochanter-tibia chaetotaxy of legs I–IV [4, 5], i.e., latasti, haplodactyli, ovambica, and indica, and into groups А, В based on differences in a tarsal chaetotaxy of legs I [4–6]. However, about one-third of the species of the genus Geckobia is not assigned to any of the groups due to their unique morphological characters or vague descriptions.
Currently, the genus is known from lizards of the families Gekkonidae, Phyllodactylidae, Carphodactylidae, Diplodactylidae, Eublepharidae, and Liolaemidae [3, 4]. Additionally, one species, G. enigmatica, have been found on the tortoise Astrochelys yniphora (Vaillant) . The distribution of the genus is very wide, including six regions: the Palearctic, Afrotropic, Neotropic, Indomalayan, and Australasian ecozones [3, 4].
Below, I describe two new species of the genus Geckobia from the infraorder Gekkota: Geckobia africana n. sp. found on African gecko Cnemaspis africana (Werner) (Gekkonidae) from Tanzania and Geckobia milii n. sp. associated with thick-tailed gecko Underwoodisaurus milii (Bory De Saint-Vincent) (Carphodactylidae) from Australia. According to the leg chaetotaxy pattern, the former species belongs to Geckobia group 1 established by Jack  (the latasti group of Fajfer ) whereas for the latter species and Geckobia simplex Hirst, 1926, I propose a new species group based on its unique morphology. Species of the genus Geckobia are recorded herein from hosts of the genera Cnemaspis and Underwoodisaurus for the first time.
2. Materials and Methods
All mites were collected form geckos preserved in 70% ethanol in the Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark. The mites, before mounting in Hoyer’s medium, were cleared and softened in Nesbitt’s solution at 50°C for 1–3 hours. Then, the mites were studied using the light microscope Olympus BH-2 with differential interference contrast (DIC) illumination and drawings were made using a camera lucida drawing attachment. All measurements are given in micrometres as the data for the holotype followed by the ranges for the paratypes. Nomenclature of the leg and idiosomal setae follows Grandjean [7, 8], and names of the palpal setae follow Grandjean  as adapted to the family Pterygosomatidae by Bochkov & OConnor . The scientific names of the lizards follow Uetz and Hošek .
Specimen depositories and reference numbers are cited using the following abbreviations: ZMUC, Zoological Museum, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; AMU, Adam Mickiewicz University, Department of Animal Morphology, Poznan, Poland.
Family Pterygosomatidae Oudemans, 1910
Genus Geckobia Mégnin, 1878
Species group latasti
Geckobia africana n. sp.
Type-Host. Cnemaspis africana (Werner) (Sauria: Gekkonidae).
Type-Locality. Tanzania, Iringa Region, Mufindi district, Uzungwa Scarp Forest Reserve, 8°31.58′S; 35°54′E; 8.III.1996, coll. McKamey.
Type Material. Female holotype and 1 female paratype. Mites removed by M. Fajfer. Female holotype is deposited in the AMU (Reg. No. AMU-PTE26.1), female paratype in the ZMUC (Reg. No. R341385).
Etymology. The species name is derived from the species name of the host and is a noun in apposition.
Female. Gnathosoma. Chelicerae 120 (125) long; basal swollen part 50 (55) long, slender distal part 70 (70) long. Movable cheliceral digit three-pronged. Fixed cheliceral digit spinous and 10 (10) long. Palpal femora with thick plumose setae dF, 15 (15) long; palpal genua with filiform slightly serrate setae dG, 30 (25) long. Palpal tibiae with 3 smooth setae: dTi, l’Ti, l’’Ti and long curved claw. Palpal tarsi with 4 smooth setae. Subcapitular setae n densely serrate, about 25 (35) long. Each branch of peritremes with barely discernible chambers, 60 (60) long. Hypostome 115 (125) long, with flattened apex. Idiosoma 330 (320) long and 365 (395) wide. Dorsum. Propodonotal shield reduced to small ovoid platelets present anterolaterally. On each platelet eyes and two thick, plumose, and slightly apically expanded setae about 25 long, present. Posterior to platelets 5 thick and serrate setae, 25–30 long. Anterolateral and mediolateral parts with about 40 pairs of slightly plumose setae (10–25 long) that increase in length from anterior to posterior part of idiosoma. Posterolateral parts with about 45 pairs of blunt-pointed, slightly serrate setae, 35–60 long. Venter. Anterior part with about 50 pairs of short and thick plumose setae, 10–15 long; medial part with numerous (about 140 setae) scale-like setae, about 25 long, lateral and posterior parts with longer slender and blunt-pointed setae, 45–60 long. Genital region. Genital setae represented by 3 pairs of slender blunt-pointed setae g1–g4 60 (65), 55 (55), 30 (30), and 40 (35) long, respectively. Pseudanal series represented by 11 densely serrate, flattened setae ps, 30–75 long. Legs. Coxal setation: 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b arranged in formula: 2–2–3–2. All coxal setae spur-like, except for simple and slightly serrate setae 1a and 1b. Leg chaetotaxy as in group 1 of Jack : tibiae I–IV (5–5–5–5), genua I–IV (1–0–0–1), femora I–IV (2–2–2–2), trochanters I–IV (1–1–1–1). Setae dTiI–IV, l’TiI–IV, l’’TiI–IV, vGI simple and smooth; setae v’TiI–IV, v’’TiI–IV, vGIV simple and with barely discernible serration; dFI–IV simple and slightly serrate, vFI–IV and vTrI–IV spur-like with serrate apices. Setation of tarsi I: 14 setae (ft, tc’, tc’’, p’, p’’, a’, a’’, it’, it’’, u’, u’’, vs’, vs’’, pl’) and solenidion ω1; tarsi II: 10 setae (tc’, tc’’, p’, p’’, a’, a’’, u’, u’’, vs’, vs’’) and ω1; tarsi III and IV with 10 setae each (tc’, tc’’, p’, p’’, a’, a’’, u’, u’’, vs’, vs’’). Solendion ω1 at least 2 times longer than seta ft. Setae tc’, tc’’, it’, it’’ of leg I represented by euphatidia; tc’ and tc” of legs II–IV, u’ and u” of legs I–IV slightly serrate, a’ and a” of legs I–IV filiform, vs’ and vs” of legs I–IV serrate.
Differential Diagnosis. This new species is the most similar to Geckobia loricata Berlese, 1892 described from Tarentola mauritanica (Linnaeus) (Gekkota: Phyllodactylidae) . In females of both species the eyes are present, the setation of tibiae-coxae I–IV and tarsi I–IV is the same and the scale-like setae are present in the middle of the idiosomal venter. This new species differs from G. loricata by the following features. In females of G. africana, the propodonotal shield is present in a form of small platelets on the antero-lateral margins of the idiosoma, all posterior and posterolateral setae are slender and blunt-pointed, whereas in G. loricata, the propodonotal shield is absent, the posterior setae are thick and serrate, and the posterolateral setae are fine-pointed and densely serrate.
Species Group Simplex
Female. Gnathosoma. Fixed cheliceral digit present. Palpal femora with thick serrate setae dF, palpal genua with filiform setae dG. Idiosoma nearly circular in shape (only slightly wider than long). Propodonotal shield present. Legs. Setae of tibiae I–IV (5–5–5–5), genua I–IV (1–0–0–1), femora I–IV (3–2–2–2), trochanters I–IV (1–1–1–1).
Host Range. Gecko species: Hemidactylus leschenaultia and Underwoodisaurus milii.
Species Included. Geckobia simplex Hirst, 1926 and Geckobia milli n. sp.
Remarks. The species of the simplex group are the most similar to the indica group from Gekkonidae from South Africa . In females of both groups, the shape of the idiosoma is nearly circular, the arrangement of dorsal idiosomal setae is very similar, and setae dF are stout and dG filiform. The simplex group differs from the indica group by the following features. In females of the simplex group five setae on tibiae I–III are present and setae l’GI, l”GIV, dFI, dFII and lFIII are present, whereas in females of the indica group, four setae on tibiae I–III are present and setae l’GI, l”GIV, dFI, dFII, lFIII are absent.
Geckobia milii n. sp.
Type-Host. Underwoodisaurus milii (Bory De Saint-Vincent) (Sauria: Carphodactylidae).
Type-Locality. Australia, Far North Queensland, Cape York Peninsula, 9.VI.1914, coll. unknown.
Type Material. Female holotype and 1 female paratype. Mites removed by M. Fajfer. Female holotype is deposited in the AMU (Reg. No. AMU-PTE27.1), female paratype in the ZMUC (Reg. No. R34910).
Etymology. The species name is derived from the species name of the host and is a noun in apposition.
Female. Gnathosoma. Chelicerae 70 (70) long; basal swollen part 45 (45) long, slender distal part 80 (80) long. Movable cheliceral digit three-pronged. Fixed cheliceral digit spinous and 5 (5) long. Palpal femora with serrate setae dF, 20 (25) long; palpal genua with slightly apically serrate setae dG, 35 (40) long. Palpal tibiae with filiform setae: dTi, l’Ti, l’’Ti and long curved claw. Setae l’Ti and l”Ti smooth, setae dTi with barely discernible serration. Palpal tarsi with 4 smooth setae. Subcapitular setae n slightly serrate, about 25 (20) long. Each branch of peritremes with barely discernible chambers, 65 (70) long. Hypostome as in Figure 6 with small barely discernible denticles present at flattened apex, 125 (130) long. Idiosoma 375 (495) long and 395 (505) wide. Dorsum with triangular propodonotal shield slightly concave in anterior margin, 160 wide and 70 long. On each side of propodonotal shield 5 thick, spur-like serrate setae, 10–15 long. Eyes absent. Mediolateral and posterolateral parts of idiosoma with about 40 pairs of thick serrate setae, 20–25 long. Lateral margins with about 15 pairs of longer blunt-pointed smooth setae, 35–65 long. All venter covered with numerous (about 150 setae) smooth and fine-pointed setae, 45–65 long, except for antero-medial part of idiosoma with 8 short plumose setae, about 10 long. Genital area with 3 smooth genital setae g1–g3; setae g1–g2 60–65 long, g3 about 25 long. Pseudanal series represented by 2 pairs of blunt-pointed smooth setae, 70–85 long. Legs. Coxal setation: 1a, 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 3b, 3c, 4a, 4b, arranged in formula: 2–2–3–2. All coxal setae thick, serrate and spur-like, except for simple and slightly serrate setae 1a and 1b. Leg chaetotaxy: tibiae I–IV (5–5–5–5), genua I–IV (1–0–0–1), femora I–IV (3–2–2–2), trochanters I–IV (1–1–1–1). Setae dTiI–IV, l’TiI–IV, l’’TiI–IV, vGI,v’TiI–IV, v’’TiI–IV, smooth; dFI–IV and vTrI–IV slightly serrate, vFI–IV and vGIV with barely discernible serration. Setation of tarsi I: 14 setae (ft, tc’, tc’’, p’, p’’, a’, a’’, it’, it’’, u’, u’’, vs’, vs’’, pl’) and solenidion ω1; tarsi II: 10 setae (tc’, tc’’, p’, p’’, a’, a’’, u’, u’’, vs’, vs’’) and ω1; tarsi III and IV with 10 setae each (tc’, tc’’, p’, p’’, a’, a’’, u’, u’’, vs’, vs’’). Solendion ω1 two times longer than seta ft. Setae p’ and p” fan-like. Setae tc’, tc’’, it’, it’’ of leg I represented by euphatidia; tc’ and tc” of legs II–IV, u’ and u” of legs IV slightly serrate, a’ and a” filiform, vs’ and vs” serrate.
Differential Diagnosis. This new species is the most similar to Geckobia simplex Hirst, 1926 described from Hemidactylus leschenaultia Duméril & Bibron (Gekkonoidea: Gekkonidae) from India . In females of both species, the idiosoma is nearly circular in shape and almost as wide as long, the propodonotal shield is present, the ventral setae are slender; the setation of tibia-trochanter IV and tarsi I–IV is the same. This new species differs from G. simplex by the following features: the propodonotal shield is triangular with slightly concave anterior margin and bears 10 setae, the eyes are absent, the dorsal anterior setae are much shorter than the posterior setae and seta a” of tarsi I is present. In G. simplex, the propodonotal shield is reniform with concave the posterior margin and bears about 36 setae, the eyes are present, the anterior dorsal setae are almost as long as the posterior setae, and seta a” of tarsi I is absent.
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares that they have no conflicts of interest.
The author would like to thank Peter Rask Møller and Daniel Klingberg Johansson (ZMUC) for their irreplaceable help during the collection of the mites. This research was partially supported by grants from the European Commission’s (FP6) Integrated Infrastructure Initiative Programme SYNTHESYS (DK-TAF 6273) and the Polish National Science Centre (no. DEC-2013/11/N/NZ8/00618).
- M. Bertrand and M. Pedrono, “Euryxeny and stenoxeny of the genus Geckobia Mégnin (Actinedida: Pterygosomatidae): Geckobia enigmatica n. sp. collected from the Madagascan tortoise (Geochelone yniphora),” Acarologia, vol. 40, pp. 147–153, 2000.
- R. Paredes-León, H. Klompen, and T. M. Pérez, “Systematic revision of the genera Geckobiella Hirst, 1917 and Hirstiella Berlese, 1920 (Acari: Prostigmata: Pterygosomatidae) with description of a new genus for American species parasites on geckos formerly placed in Hirstiella,” Zootaxa, vol. 3510, pp. 1–40, 2012.
- M. Fajfer, “Acari (Chelicerata) - Parasites of reptiles,” Acarina, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 108–129, 2012.
- M. Fajfer, “Mites of the new species group nitidus (Acariformes: Pterygosomatidae: Geckobia), parasites of lizards in South America,” Systematic Parasitology, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 213–220, 2015.
- A. V. Bochkov and S. V. Mironov, “Two new species of the genus Geckobia (Acari: Pterygosomatidae) from geckons (Lacertilia: Gekkonomorpha) with a brief review of host-parasite associations of the genus,” Russian Journal of Herpetology, vol. 7, pp. 61–68, 2000.
- K. M. Jack, “Leg-chaetotaxy with special reference to the Pterygosomatidae (Acarina),” Annals of the Natal Museum, vol. 16, pp. 152–171, 1964.
- F. Grandjean, “Les segments postlarvaires de lhysterosoma chez les oribatides (Acariens),” Bulletin Societe Zoology France, vol. 64, pp. 273–284, 1939.
- F. Grandjean, “Observations sure les Acariens de la famille des Stigmaeidae,” Archives des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, vol. 26, pp. 103–131, 1944.
- F. Grandjean, “Au sujet de l’ organe de Claparede, des eupathides multiples et des taenidies mandibulaires chez les Acariens actinochitineux,” Archives des Sciences Physiques et Naturelles, vol. 28, pp. 63–87, 1946.
- A. V. Bochkov and B. M. OConnor, “A review of the external morphology of the family Pterygosomatidae and its systematic position within the Prostigmata (Acari: Acariformes),” Parazitologiya, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 201–214, 2006 (Russian).
- P. Uetz, P. Freed, and J. Hošek, “The Reptile Database,” [updated 2016 Oct 15, cited 2018 Jan 21] http://www.reptile-database.org.
- A. Berlese, “Ordo Prostigmata (Trombidiidae),” Acari, Myriopoda et Scorpiones Hucusque in Italia Reperta, vol. 60, pp. 1–155, 1882.
- A. S. Hirst, “On the parasitic mites of the suborder prostigmata (Trombidioidea) found on lizards,” Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology, vol. 36, no. 242, pp. 173–200, 1926.
Copyright © 2018 Monika Fajfer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.