BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2018 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2018 |Article ID 9328671 | 12 pages |

Systemic Infection of Nicotiana benthamiana with Potato virus X Nanoparticles Presenting a Fluorescent iLOV Polypeptide Fused Directly to the Coat Protein

Academic Editor: Michael Kalafatis
Received28 Jun 2017
Accepted25 Dec 2017
Published13 Feb 2018


Plant virus-based nanoparticles can be produced in plants on a large scale and are easily modified to introduce new functions, making them suitable for applications such as vaccination and drug delivery, tissue engineering, and in vivo imaging. The latter is often achieved using green fluorescent protein and its derivatives, but the monovalent fluorescent protein iLOV is smaller and more robust. Here, we fused the iLOV polypeptide to the N-terminus of the Potato virus X (PVX) coat protein, directly or via the Foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A sequence, for expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Direct fusion of the iLOV polypeptide did not prevent the assembly or systemic spread of the virus and we verified the presence of fusion proteins and iLOV hybrid virus particles in leaf extracts. Compared to wild-type PVX virions, the PVX particles displaying the iLOV peptide showed an atypical, intertwined morphology. Our results confirm that a direct fusion of the iLOV fluorescent protein to filamentous PVX nanoparticles offers a promising tool for imaging applications.

1. Introduction

The functionalization of plant virus-based nanoparticles is an emerging field, facilitated by the well-characterized genomic sequence and modular organization of many different plant viruses [13]. Plant viruses come in various shapes and sizes with different surface properties, allowing researchers to pick the most suitable virus for a given application. The structures of many plant viruses are known to atomic or near-atomic resolution [47]. The advantages of plant virus-based nanoparticles include their ability to self-assemble with precise symmetry and polyvalency, their monodispersity and stability under a range of conditions, their inherent safety (biocompatibility and noninfectivity in mammals), and the rapid, simple and scalable production that can be achieved by molecular farming in plants [8]. None of these properties can be matched by synthetic nanoparticles.

Potato virus X (PVX) is the type member of the genus Potexvirus (family Alphaflexiviridae) and is often used as a vector for heterologous gene expression in plants [918]. The complete 6.4 kb genomic RNA sequences of several PVX strains are known [1921]. The plus-strand RNA genome has a 5′-methylguanosine cap and is polyadenylated at the 3′-terminus [22, 23]. Each PVX particle comprises ~1270 coat protein (CP) subunits helically arranged to form filamentous, flexible virions encapsidating the viral genomic RNA. The C-terminus of each CP subunit is located within the PVX particle whereas the N-terminus is exposed on the surface, providing an ideal site for the presentation of peptides and proteins [4, 2428].

Genetic modification or chemical conjugation can be used to tailor the surface properties of plant viruses allowing them to be engineered, for example, as drug delivery vehicles, tissue scaffolds, and electronic devices [1, 8, 2932]. Furthermore, fluorescence-labeled virus nanoparticles can be used for biomedical imaging [3339]. Such labeling is usually achieved by the conjugation of chemical dyes to functional groups on the virus surface after particle assembly. Several studies have shown that PVX particles carrying molecular contrast agents such as Alexa Fluor647 can efficiently penetrate solid tumors and accumulate inside [4042]. However, chemical conjugation results in a limited number of tagged CP subunits, whereas the genetic fusion of a fluorescent protein to the CP allows denser labeling [35]. The latter strategy can be challenging because the size and biochemical properties of the fusion protein may interfere with particle assembly, stability, or infectivity. Single amino acids or peptides can be fused directly to the N-terminus of the PVX CP, whereas longer peptides that prevent particle assembly require the presence of wild-type PVX CPs to avoid steric hindrance, resulting in the formation of hybrid particles containing both wild-type CP and the fusion protein. This is generally achieved by inserting the Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) 2A sequence between the transgene and the cp sequence, yielding a CP fusion protein, free target protein, and wild-type CP due to a ribosomal skip during translation (the overcoat method) [4345]. The biochemical properties of peptides and proteins fused to the CP can also affect virus particle assembly, stability, or functionality (e.g., systemic spreading), including the number of serine/threonine [46] or tryptophan residues [47], and the isoelectric point (pI) [47, 48]. A PVX-mCherry overcoat system for in vivo tumor imaging in mouse models was recently reported [37].

Although fluorescent proteins such as mCherry and green fluorescent protein (GFP) are routinely used as reporters for molecular interactions, they are dependent on pH and oxygen, and their large size (at least ~240 amino acids) and complex structure make them more difficult to express [4951]. The recently discovered monomeric fluorescent protein iLOV (light, oxygen, or voltage sensing) was engineered from the LOV2 domain of Arabidopsis thaliana phototropin  2 and can be fused to the movement protein of TMV for quantitative biological imaging applications [5255]. The iLOV sequence is approximately half the size of mCherry thus reducing the genetic load on the recombinant viruses, and its reversible photobleaching properties make it ideal for the analysis of virus movement in plants [52, 55, 56]. Here, we compared the behavior of PVX-iLOV particles created by either direct fusion or the use of the FMDV 2A sequence, focusing on their long-distance movement and propensity for systemic infection and the morphology of the modified particles compared to wild-type PVX.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Construction of Plant Viral Vectors

The PVX-based vectors we used to produce recombinant particles displaying the iLOV polypeptide are shown in Figure 1(a). The iLOV sequence was amplified from source vector pSC1001a (Dr. S. Chapman, The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, Scotland) using the primers listed in Table 1 and was transferred to pCR2.1-TOPO as previously described [57]. An iLOV fragment was isolated from this intermediate vector using NheI and BspEI and was transferred to vector pTCXIIc [37] either as a direct fusion (replacing the mCherry and FMDV 2A genes) or as fusion via the FMDV 2A sequence (replacing only the mCherry gene). The iLOV sequence was also inserted into pPVX-N-mCherry-G4S-CP (our unpublished data) to create an iLOV-CP fusion via a (Gly4Ser)3 linker (G4S). The integrity of the resulting vectors pPVX-iLOV-CP, pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP, and pPVX-iLOV-G4S-CP was tested by PCR and sequencing. The vectors were propagated in Escherichia coli strain DH5α ready for the inoculation of Nicotiana benthamiana plants as previously described [57].

Primer nameNucleotide sequence (5′3′)


2.2. RNA and Protein Analyses

Total RNA was isolated from systemically infected N. benthamiana leaves using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and 3 μg RNA samples were treated with 3 U DNaseI (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as recommended. The corresponding cDNA was produced using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase RNaseH Minus Point Mutant (Promega, Madison, USA). We mixed 1 μg of the DNaseI-treated RNA with 0.5 μM of the oligo-dT primer for hybrid PVX particles and 27 μl DEPC-treated water. The mixture was heated to 80°C and then incubated for 10 min on ice to ensure primer annealing before adding 10 μl 5x M-MLV reaction buffer, 8.5 μl DEPC-treated water, 1 mM dNTPs, and 1 μl M-MLV. The cDNA synthesis reaction was carried out for 30 min at 40°C, 20 min at 45°C, 20 min at 50°C, 20 min at 55°C, and 20 min at 70°C. After reverse transcription, residual RNA was degraded with 1 μl 10 mg/ml RNaseA for 1 h at 37°C. PCR was carried out with primers TGB-fw and CX4 and the products were resolved by 1.2% agarose gel electrophoresis to confirm the integrity of the iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP cDNAs.

RNA levels in PVX-infected leaves were determined by quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). We mixed 5 μl of recombinant PVX cDNA samples with 0.3 μM each of primers CX4i and CX8, 10 μl 2x iQ™ SYBR Green® supermix (BioRad, Munich, Germany), and 3.8 μl water. The qPCR program comprised three steps: 3 min at 95°C for polymerase activation and DNA denaturation and then 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 30 s at 55°C, and 45 s at 72°C measured with SYBR Green. Finally, melting curves were constructed from 55°C to 95°C in 0.5°C/2 s steps using primers for the cp (CX4i and CX8) and tgb (CX3i and CX9) as previously described [14]. Triplicate measurements were taken with samples from at least three different plants.

Proteins were extracted from systemically infected N. benthamiana leaves and were analyzed by SDS-PAGE [58] and western blot, with specific antibodies against iLOV and the PVX CP as previously described [57].

2.3. Confocal Microscopy

Systemic infection with recombinant PVX particles was visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy using a Leica TCS SP instrument (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). We removed  cm leaf pieces showing fluorescence and mounted them with the abaxial surface facing upwards onto glass microscope slides. An HCX PL APO water-corrected objective was used with a drop of water placed directly on the coverslip to image viral cell-to-cell movement across the epidermal cell layer. The excitation and detection wavelengths for iLOV were 476 nm and 510–550 nm, respectively. LCS software was used for image analysis, following import into Photoshop CS5 (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, USA) for contrast adjustments and overlay.

2.4. Purification of iLOV-Displaying Particles

Purified iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP virus particles were prepared as described in the protocol published by the International Potato Centre (Lima, Peru) with modifications as previously described [13]. Centrifugation with a sucrose cushion was omitted and the pellet was directly resuspended after clarification. Subsequent centrifugation was carried out at 7800 ×g for 10 min at 4°C instead of 2000 ×g for 5 min at 4°C, and the second ultracentrifugation to sediment the virions was at least 3-4 h instead of 1 h. The final clarification step was also omitted.

2.5. Transmission Electron Microscopy

Immunosorbent electron microscopy (ISEM) was carried out with virus-containing plant extracts from systemically infected leaves or purified recombinant viruses. Pioloform-coated nickel grids (Plano, Wetzlar, Germany) were incubated on a drop of monoclonal antibody MAC58 against PVX (kindly provided by Professor L. Torrance, The James Hutton Institute) for 20 min at room temperature to capture the recombinant PVX particles. Immunogold decoration of captured or adsorbed particles with primary anti-PVX antibody or the anti-iLOV antiserum and secondary goat anti-rabbit (GAR) 15 nm gold conjugate (British BioCell, Cardiff, UK) and imaging was carried out as previously described [57].

3. Results

3.1. Vector Construction and Infection of Plants

Three different PVX-based expression constructs were prepared, joining the iLOV sequence to the 5′-end of the PVX cp gene using different strategies: (a) a direct fusion, (b) via a (Gly4Ser)3 linker, and (c) via the FMDV 2A sequence (Figure 1(a)). Following the inoculation of N. benthamiana plants separately with each vector, plants infected with pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP showed initial fluorescent spots at the inoculation site 4 days after inoculation (dpi) and systemic infection was observed 6 dpi, as revealed by the general green fluorescence. These plants also displayed more severe symptoms than typically observed for systemic infection with wild-type PVX, including mosaic patterns and dwarfing, and necrotic lesions appearing from 10 dpi onwards (Figures 1(c) and 1(e)). In contrast, plants infected with pPVX-iLOV-CP showed initial fluorescent spots at the inoculation site 8 dpi or later. The long-distance movement of the virus was significantly delayed: systemic infection was not observed until 17–21 dpi (Figure 1(d)). Plants inoculated with the pPVX-iLOV-G4S-CP vector did not show any signs of systemic infection (Figure 1(f)).

Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was carried out to determine the levels of cp RNA in leaves from systemically infected N. benthamiana plants (Figure 2). Total RNA was isolated from leaves showing iLOV fluorescence, cDNA synthesis was carried out and the integrity of the modified PVX sequence was verified by a control PCR with primers TGB-fw and CX4, amplifying a region between the triple gene block protein 3 (tgbp3) and cp genes (Figure 2(a)). We then determined the relative levels of the tgbp3 and cp RNAs with the housekeeping gene PP2A used as a reference. The amount of ilov and cp RNA was compared to the amount of tgb3 RNA, which can be found in the PVX genomic RNA (gRNA) and subgenomic RNAs (sgRNAs) 1 and 2 but not sgRNAs 3. This allowed a direct correlation between the iLOV-(2A)-CP RNA level and the total amount of PVX RNA. The quantity of tgbp3 and cp RNA was correlated to PP2A mRNA and the relative amount of cp to tgb3 was calculated and compared. We observed higher relative cp RNA levels for the iLOV-2A-CP fusion than for the iLOV-CP direct fusion (Figure 2(b)). This was consistent with the rapid infection and severe symptoms in plants infected with pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP compared to the slower systemic infection with pPVX-iLOV-CP.

3.2. Analysis of Recombinant PVX Particles Displaying iLOV

Extracts were prepared from leaves containing the pPVX-iLOV-CP and pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP fusion proteins for analysis by SDS-PAGE and western blot. The iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP fusion proteins were detected with the anti-PVX antibody and the anti-iLOV antiserum with molecular weights of 38.0 and 39.9 kDa, respectively, as expected (Figures 3(b) and 3(c) highlighted with asterisks). A 25 kDa band representing the wild-type PVX CP was also detected in the samples containing iLOV-2A-CP because fusion to the FMDV 2A sequence is known to cause a ribosomal skip (Figure 3(b)). However, the CP was also detected by the anti-iLOV antiserum (Figure 3(c)). The 13.5 kDa free iLOV protein (highlighted with an arrow) was also visible in the western blot probed with anti-iLOV antiserum (Figure 3(c)) as well as in the polyacrylamide gel under UV light (Figure 3(d)). Densitometric analysis of iLOV bands in the anti-iLOV western blot showed a ratio of approximately 7 to 3 for free iLOV to the iLOV-2A-CP fusion protein.

The ability of the fusion proteins to assemble into PVX particles was confirmed by electron microscopy. PVX particles were immunocaptured from leaf extracts using monoclonal antibody MAC58, detected with a primary anti-PVX antibody and decorated with GAR 15 nm gold conjugates (Figures 3(e)–3(h)). Typically, wild-type PVX particles are flexible  nm structures (Figure 3(g)), but iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP particles showed a different morphology (Figures 3(e) and 3(f)). These particles were of the same size as wild-type particles but were intertwined, resulting in a morphology similar to that described for PVX particles with N-terminal coat protein truncations [59].

3.3. Localization of iLOV within the Plant Cell

To gain insight into the cell-to-cell movement of hybrid PVX particles, leaves systemically infected with pPVX-iLOV-CP and pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP were studied by confocal laser scanning microscopy (Figure 4). The iLOV fluorescence was concentrated in certain areas of the cell wall, which potentially indicates the cell-to-cell movement of PVX-iLOV particles through the plasmodesmata. The fluorescence profile (Figures 4(c) and 4(f)) indicated that the virus uses these intercellular links to cross the plant cell wall [60, 61]. We also observed large viral replication complexes (VRCs) within cells, typically one per infected cell [62, 63]. In leaves infected with pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP, we detected free iLOV protein in the cytoplasm and in the nucleus, reflecting the ribosomal skip at the FMDV 2A sequence (Figure 4(f)). The fluorescence of the iLOV-CP direct fusion led to a more precise localization of the hybrid virus within the plasmodesmata.

3.4. Purification and Immunogold Labeling of Virus Particles

PVX particles displaying iLOV were purified with yields of 136–206 mg per kg of infected leaf material by adapting the purification protocol for wild-type PVX particles developed by the International Potato Centre. The different pooled fractions were tested for the presence of iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP by western blot (Figure 5). Both the polyclonal anti-PVX antibody and the anti-iLOV antiserum detected some degradation products but also intact proteins with the anticipated molecular weights of the iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP fusion proteins (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). The iLOV-CP fusion protein is only detected in very low amounts with an anti-PVX antibody, probably due to the low amounts of purified particles and protein degradation. The anti-iLOV antiserum also detected bands of the wild-type PVX CP, and thus it was necessary to find out whether the antiserum was able to also detect wild-type PVX particles by electron microscopy. Purified iLOV-CP, iLOV-2A-CP, and wild-type PVX virions were directly adsorbed onto the grids (Figure 5(d)) or captured using monoclonal antibody MAC58 (Figure 5(e)). The fusion proteins were detected by the primary anti-iLOV antiserum and labeled with the secondary GAR 15 nm gold conjugate. We found that only PVX particles displaying the iLOV protein on the surface were labeled, not the wild-type PVX particles. Thus, scattered single gold particles are most likely background and not bound to particles. These experiments also confirmed that the heterologous fusion protein is accessible even if the recombinant virions are intertwined.

4. Discussion

The biological compatibility and multivalency of genetically and chemically addressable sites on virus CPs have resulted in a broad range of applications for plant virus nanoparticles. In this study, PVX-derived vectors (Figure 1(a)) were generated to present the monomeric fluorescent protein iLOV on the surface of PVX particles by fusing it to the 5′-terminus of the PVX CP directly, via a FMDV 2A sequence (overcoat), or via a sequence coding for a flexible glycine-serine-rich linker. The direct fusion (pPVX-iLOV-CP) and overcoat (pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP) constructs were able to achieve systemic infection whereas the linker construct (pPVX-iLOV-G4S-CP) was not, most likely due to size limitation [15, 48, 64, 65], and the latter was therefore excluded from further experiments. To exclude the possibility that the flexibility of the G4S-linker enables iLOV to move between the CP subunits and prevents particle assembly, we replaced the G4S linker with the more rigid AK3A linker (three copies of the sequence AKKKA). The plants showed neither green fluorescence in inoculated leaves nor systemic infection at 28 dpi (data not shown).

Systemic infection with pPVX-iLOV-CP was delayed and the infection symptoms were mild, whereas rapid systemic infection was established following inoculation with pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP and the infection symptoms were severe, including necrosis (Figures 1(d) and 1(e)). This may reflect the ability of the iLOV protein to promote the synthesis of reactive oxygen species [66]. Following inoculation with pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP, the iLOV polypeptide was overexpressed as a fusion protein but also as a free protein due to the overcoat principle, potentially triggering the accumulation of greater quantities of reactive oxygen species in these plants compared to those infected with pPVX-iLOV-CP (Figure 1(e)).

When certain peptides or proteins are fused to plant virus CPs, the assembly of the virion is sterically or electrostatically inhibited and systemic movement prevented [15, 48, 64, 65]. However, fusing the 113-amino-acid iLOV polypeptide directly to the N-terminus of the PVX CP still allows the assembly of hybrid virions which can move from cell-to-cell and achieve systemic infections via translocation through the vascular system. The iLOV polypeptide is much larger than the largest peptides that have been displayed by direct CP fusion in other plant viruses, for example, 23 amino acids for Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) [64], 30 amino acids for Plum pox virus [67], and 50 amino acids for Cowpea mosaic virus [65, 68]. With the help of a 15-residue linker, a 133-amino-acid fragment of staphylococcal protein A has been displayed on the surface of TMV [69], whereas the largest peptide expressed on the surface of PVX until the current report was 14 amino acids in length [12]. Fusion peptides larger than 40 amino acids usually require the presence of the wild-type PVX CP to assemble into intact hybrid particles, which is most easily achieved by incorporating the FMDV 2A sequence [43] as shown by the successful display of the 45 kDa VP6 rotavirus capsid protein (397 amino acids) on PVX [11]. The ratio of fusion protein to wild-type CP cannot be predicted accurately [70, 71], although using different variants of 2A sequences provides a degree of control [71]. As a tool for the bioimaging of viral cell-to-cell movement, fluorescent proteins should be densely arrayed on the virus surface to achieve a bright signal, as shown for the iLOV-CP direct fusion but not for the iLOV-2A-CP construct, which also generated diffuse fluorescence mainly caused by the free iLOV polypeptide (Figure 4).

We investigated the cp RNA level in relation to the tgbp3 RNA by qPCR because the PVX tgbp3 sequence is found on the gRNA and all sgRNAs except that carrying the cp gene, whereas the cp sequence is found on the gRNA and all sgRNAs. The comparison of cp and tgbp3 RNA levels therefore provides an estimation of cp RNA levels with a built-in internal control. The level of iLOV-CP RNA was lower than that of iLOV-2A-CP RNA (Figure 2), explaining why the iLOV-CP particles spread more slowly through the plant. Our data suggest there are lower levels of sgRNA3 and thus lower levels of the iLOV-CP fusion protein, which can assemble to intact particles for long-distance movement. A certain ratio between the number of assembled particles and the quantity of free PVX CP [46] is necessary for viral cell-to-cell movement and long-distance transport [47, 61, 7274]. This is why fewer iLOV-CP particles assembled compared to iLOV-2A-CP particles, thus reducing the viral load. These results are consistent with the observed delayed systemic spread of iLOV-CP particles and the rapid infection and severe symptoms caused by iLOV-2A-CP. However, the differences of sgRNA levels are unexpected, given that the iLOV sequence is incorporated into the viral genome in the same way in both constructs. The only difference is the 2A sequence introduced between the iLOV and CP sequences. The introduction of the 2A sequence in this construct therefore seems to be more favorable even for sgRNA levels.

Some PVX coat proteins with N-terminal extension peptides cannot form particles due to steric inhibition [43], the number of serine/threonine [46] or tryptophan residues [47], or the pI of the fusion peptide [47, 48]. If fusion peptides have a pI value in the range 5.2–9.2, the resulting particles can move systemically [47], although basic amino acids reduce the fitness of the virus resulting in the selection of better performing mutants [48]. Only ~13% of the amino acids in the iLOV peptide are positively charged and the iLOV-CP fusion has a pI of 5.8. There was no reversion to the wild-type PVX cp sequence at 34 dpi as reported for iLOV fusions to the TMV CP [57]. However, we observed proteolytic degradation of the purified iLOV-CP particles in western blots probed with the polyclonal anti-PVX antibody and anti-iLOV antiserum after particle purification (Figures 5(b) and 5(c)). The particles might be degraded during the purification process due to a lower stability of the particles in general. However, the extracts contained larger quantities of the fusion products than the virus purification (compare Figures 3(b) and 3(c) and 5(b) and 5(c)). In addition to protein degradation, we might have lost particles with a high ratio of iLOV-CP fusion to wild-type CP during the gradient purification. Particles with a greater proportion of fusion proteins accumulate in the gradient with a lower sucrose concentration and might be lost due to low visibility in the SDS gels of the gradient fractions. This could probably be prevented by adapting the purification protocol accordingly.

The presence of iLOV-decorated PVX particles in systemically infected leaves was confirmed by western blots and transmission electron microscopy (Figures 3 and 5). Wild-type PVX particles are filamentous rods, 515 nm in length—they are flexible but exist as discrete units. In contrast, the iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP particles were similar in structure but the filaments tended to intertwine. A similar morphology was reported when PVX particles were assembled from N-terminally truncated CPs lacking codons 7–31 of the cp gene [59]. These results show that the N-terminus is required to modulate intramolecular and/or intermolecular interactions. Approximately 37% of the residues in the iLOV protein are hydrophobic, so intermolecular hydrophobic interactions may be responsible for the intertwined morphology.

Confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed that the recombinant iLOV-CP and iLOV-2A-CP particles were potentially able to pass between epidermal cells, as indicated by the presence of a fluorescent signal in the plasmodesmata (Figure 4). Similarly localized CPs with 2A fusions of fluorescent proteins have been reported in PVX movement studies [60, 61, 75]. We also observed one large fluorescent VRC per infected cell, which is frequently observed in established infections [60, 62, 63]. These so-called “virus factories” coordinate the infection processes [62]. Additional diffuse fluorescence was observed in epidermal cells infected with the pPVX-iLOV-2A-CP construct, representing the presence of free iLOV polypeptide. Free iLOV was also detected in western blots, with a ratio of 7 to 3 relative to the fusion protein. This leads to a high background of free iLOV in the cells, preventing the detailed analysis of CP localization. These findings emphasize the advantage of direct fusions of fluorescent proteins to the target protein.

Fluorescent proteins can provide insight into many cellular processes and interactions but also suffer from drawbacks such as their complex structure, large size, pH, and oxygen dependence [50, 51]. The iLOV polypeptide has spectral characteristics similar to GFP [76], but it is monomeric, has a lower molecular weight, is more photostable, and undergoes reversible photobleaching, the latter providing advantages for imaging applications [52, 55]. The presentation of the iLOV fluorescent protein on the surface of filamentous PVX offers a promising new imaging tool, particularly for the investigation of PVX infections. More specifically, these hybrid virions may be able to provide insight into the subcellular location of CP synthesis and the distribution and packaging of gRNA. The iLOV polypeptide can also be used for antiviral drug screening [77].

5. Conclusion

We have demonstrated that the 113-amino-acid fluorescent protein iLOV can be directly fused to the N-terminus of the PVX coat protein without the help of a flexible linker and is displayed on the particle surface. Because the iLOV protein has several advantages over other fluorescent proteins, it will be useful not only for the analysis of VRCs and long-distance virus movement, which currently relies on the production of overcoat structures, but also as a new platform for the molecular imaging of tumors. We recently reported an mCherry PVX overcoat system for tumor imaging in mouse models [37]. Our PVX-iLOV particles generated a strong fluorescent signal due to the dense array of iLOV polypeptides, offering a highly sensitive new modality for imaging applications.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors acknowledge the excellent technical assistance of Karolin Richter. They thank Dr. Sean Chapman (The James Hutton Institute, Dundee, Scotland) for the kind gift of the iLOV sequence and Professor John Christie (Institute of Molecular Cell and Systems Biology, University of Glasgow, Scotland) for the anti-iLOV antiserum. The authors thank Dr. Jens Tilsner for helpful discussions and Dr. Richard M Twyman for critically reading the manuscript. This research was funded by the Excellence Initiative of the German Federal and State Governments (Gefördert durch Mittel der Exzellenzinitiative des Bundes und der Länder).


  1. C. Lico, E. Benvenuto, and S. Baschieri, “The two-faced potato virus X: from plant pathogen to smart nanoparticle,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, article 1009, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. L. M. C. Geelen, A. Van Kammen, and B. J. M. Verduin, “Structure of the capsid of cowpea mosaic virus. The chemical subunit: molecular weight and number of subunits per particle,” Virology, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 205–213, 1972. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. J. Butler, “The current picture of the structure and assembly of tobacco mosaic virus,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 65, part 2, pp. 253–279, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  4. A. Kendall, W. Bian, A. Maris et al., “A common structure for the potexviruses,” Virology, vol. 436, no. 1, pp. 173–178, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. T. Lin, Z. Chen, R. Usha et al., “The refined crystal structure of cowpea mosaic virus at 2.8 Å resolution,” Virology, vol. 265, no. 1, pp. 20–34, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. X. Agirrezabala, E. Méndez-López, G. Lasso, M. A. Sánchez-Pina, M. Aranda, and M. Valle, “The near-atomic cryoEM structure of a flexible filamentous plant virus shows homology of its coat protein with nucleoproteins of animal viruses,” eLife, vol. 4, Article ID e11795, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. G. Rossmann, “Structure of viruses: a short history,” Quarterly Reviews of Biophysics, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 133–180, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. M. Wen and N. F. Steinmetz, “Design of virus-based nanomaterials for medicine, biotechnology, and energy,” Chemical Society Reviews, vol. 45, no. 15, pp. 4074–4126, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. S. Chapman, T. Kavanagh, and D. Baulcombe, “Potato virus X as a vector for gene expression in plants,” The Plant Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 549–557, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. D. C. Baulcombe, S. Chapman, and S. Santa Cruz, “Jellyfish green fluorescent protein as a reporter for virus infections,” The Plant Journal, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1045–1053, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. J. O'Brien, C. J. Bryant, C. Voogd, H. B. Greenberg, R. C. Gardner, and A. R. Bellamy, “Rotavirus VP6 expressed by PVX vectors in Nicotiana benthamiana coats PVX rods and also assembles into viruslike particles,” Virology, vol. 270, no. 2, pp. 444–453, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. Uhde, R. Fischer, and U. Commandeur, “Expression of multiple foreign epitopes presented as synthetic antigens on the surface of Potato virus X particles,” Archives of Virology, vol. 150, no. 2, pp. 327–340, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Uhde-Holzem, V. Schlösser, S. Viazov, R. Fischer, and U. Commandeur, “Immunogenic properties of chimeric potato virus X particles displaying the hepatitis C virus hypervariable region I peptide R9,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 166, no. 1-2, pp. 12–20, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. C. Dickmeis, R. Fischer, and U. Commandeur, “Potato virus X-based expression vectors are stabilized for long-term production of proteins and larger inserts,” Biotechnology Journal, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1369–1379, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. R. L. Toth, S. Chapman, F. Carr, and S. S. Cruz, “A novel strategy for the expression of foreign genes from plant virus vectors,” FEBS Letters, vol. 489, no. 2-3, pp. 215–219, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. M. Zelada, G. Calamante, M. de la Paz Santangelo et al., “Expression of tuberculosis antigen ESAT-6 in Nicotiana tabacum using a potato virus X-based vector,” Tuberculosis, vol. 86, no. 3-4, pp. 263–267, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. Uhde-Holzem, M. McBurney, B. D. B. Tiu et al., “Production of immunoabsorbent nanoparticles by displaying single-domain Protein A on Potato Virus X,” Macromolecular Bioscience, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 231–241, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. E. S. Mardanova, E. A. Blokhina, L. M. Tsybalova, H. Peyret, G. P. Lomonossoff, and N. V. Ravin, “Efficient transient expression of recombinant proteins in plants by the novel pEff vector based on the genome of potato virus X,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, article 247, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. J. Huisman, H. J. Linthorst, J. F. Bol, and J. C. Cornelissen, “The complete nucleotide sequence of potato virus X and its homologies at the amino acid level with various plus-stranded RNA viruses,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 69, part 8, pp. 1789–1798, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  20. B. E. Orman, R. M. Celnik, A. M. Mandel, H. N. Torres, and A. N. Mentaberry, “Complete cDNA sequence of a South American isolate of potato virus X,” Virus Research, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 293–305, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. K. G. Skryabin, A. S. Kraev, S. Y. Morozov et al., “The nucleotide sequence of potato virus x RNA,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 16, no. 22, pp. 10929-10930, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. N. Sonenberg, A. J. Shatkin, R. P. Ricciardi, M. Rubin, and R. M. Goodman, “Analysis of terminal structures of RNA from potato virus X,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 5, no. 7, pp. 2501–2512, 1978. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Y. Morozov, L. I. Lukasheva, B. K. Chernov, K. G. Skryabin, and J. G. Atabekov, “Nucleotide sequence of the open reading frames adjacent to the coat protein cistron in potato virus X genome,” FEBS Letters, vol. 213, no. 2, pp. 438–442, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. Sober, L. Jarvekulg, I. Toots, J. Radavsky, R. Villems, and M. Saarma, “Antigenic Characterization of Potato Virus X with Monoclonal Antibodies,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1799–1807, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. A. Baratova, N. I. Grebenshchikov, E. N. Dobrov et al., “The organization of potato virus X coat proteins in virus particles studied by tritium planigraphy and model building,” Virology, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 175–180, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. A. Baratova, N. I. Grebenshchikov, A. V. Shishkov et al., “The topography of the surface of potato virus X: Tritium planigraphy and immunology analysis,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 73, part 2, pp. 229–235, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. A. Nemykh, A. V. Efimov, V. K. Novikov et al., “One more probable structural transition in potato virus X virions and a revised model of the virus coat protein structure,” Virology, vol. 373, no. 1, pp. 61–71, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. L. Parker, A. Kendall, and G. Stubbs, “Surface features of potato virus X from fiber diffraction,” Virology, vol. 300, no. 2, pp. 291–295, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. P. Lomonossoff and D. J. Evans, “Applications of plant viruses in bionanotechnology,” in Plant Viral Vectors, vol. 375 of Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, pp. 61–87, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. J. N. Culver, A. D. Brown, F. Zang, M. Gnerlich, K. Gerasopoulos, and R. Ghodssi, “Plant virus directed fabrication of nanoscale materials and devices,” Virology, vol. 479-480, pp. 200–212, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. J. F. Steele, H. Peyret, K. Saunders et al., “Synthetic plant virology for nanobiotechnology and nanomedicine,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology, vol. 9, no. 4, Article ID e1447, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. N. P. Montague, E. C. Thuenemann, P. Saxena, K. Saunders, P. Lenzi, and G. P. Lomonossoff, “Recent advances of cowpea mosaic virus-based particle technology,” Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 383–390, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. M. Brunel, J. D. Lewis, G. Destito et al., “Hydrazone ligation strategy to assemble multifunctional viral nanoparticles for cell imaging and tumor targeting,” Nano Letters, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1093–1097, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. K. L. Lee, L. C. Hubbard, S. Hern, I. Yildiz, M. Gratzl, and N. F. Steinmetz, “Shape matters: The diffusion rates of TMV rods and CPMV icosahedrons in a spheroid model of extracellular matrix are distinct,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 581–588, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. D. Lewis, G. Destito, A. Zijlstra et al., “Viral nanoparticles as tools for intravital vascular imaging,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 354–360, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Manchester and P. Singh, “Virus-based nanoparticles (VNPs): Platform technologies for diagnostic imaging,” Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, vol. 58, no. 14, pp. 1505–1522, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Shukla, C. Dickmeis, A. S. Nagarajan, R. Fischer, U. Commandeur, and N. F. Steinmetz, “Molecular farming of fluorescent virus-based nanoparticles for optical imaging in plants, human cells and mouse models,” Biomaterials Science, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 784–797, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. A. M. Wen, S. Shukla, P. Saxena et al., “Interior engineering of a viral nanoparticle and its tumor homing properties,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3990–4001, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. Niehl, F. Appaix, S. Boscá et al., “Fluorescent Tobacco mosaic virus-derived bio-nanoparticles for intravital two-photon imaging,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 6, article 1244, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. Shukla, A. L. Ablack, A. M. Wen, K. L. Lee, J. D. Lewis, and N. F. Steinmetz, “Increased tumor homing and tissue penetration of the filamentous plant viral nanoparticle potato virus X,” Molecular Pharmaceutics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Shukla, A. M. Wen, N. R. Ayat et al., “Biodistribution and clearance of a filamentous plant virus in healthy and tumor-bearing mice,” Nanomedicine, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 221–235, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Shukla, R. D. Dorand, J. T. Myers et al., “Multiple administrations of viral nanoparticles alter in vivo behavior—insights from intravital microscopy,” ACS Biomaterials Science and Engineering, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 829–837, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. S. Cruz, S. Chapman, A. G. Roberts, I. M. Roberts, D. A. M. Prior, and K. J. Oparka, “Assembly and movement of a plant virus carrying a green fluorescent protein overcoat,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 93, no. 13, pp. 6286–6290, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. L. L. Donnelly, L. E. Hughes, G. Luke et al., “The ‘cleavage’ activities of foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A site-directed mutants and naturally occurring ‘2A-like’ sequences,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 82, part 5, pp. 1027–1041, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. M. L. L. Donnelly, G. Luke, A. Mehrotra et al., “Analysis of the aphthovirus 2A/2B polyprotein ‘cleavage’ mechanism indicates not a proteolytic reaction, but a novel translational effect: a putative ribosomal ‘skip’,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 82, part 5, pp. 1013–1025, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. C. Betti, C. Lico, D. Maffi et al., “Potato virus X movement in Nicotiana benthamiana: new details revealed by chimeric coat protein variants,” Molecular Plant Pathology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 198–203, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. C. Lico, F. Capuano, G. Renzone et al., “Peptide display on Potato virus X: molecular features of the coat protein-fused peptide affecting cell-to-cell and phloem movement of chimeric virus particles,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 87, part 10, pp. 3103–3112, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. K. Uhde-Holzem, R. Fischer, and U. Commandeur, “Genetic stability of recombinant potato virus X virus vectors presenting foreign epitopes,” Archives of Virology, vol. 152, no. 4, pp. 805–811, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. Drepper, T. Eggert, F. Circolone et al., “Reporter proteins for in vivo fluorescence without oxygen,” Nature Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 443–445, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. A. Gawthorne, L. E. Reddick, S. N. Akpunarlieva et al., “Express your LOV: An engineered flavoprotein as a reporter for protein expression and purification,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 12, Article ID e52962, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. N. C. Shaner, G. H. Patterson, and M. W. Davidson, “Advances in fluorescent protein technology,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, part 24, pp. 4247–4260, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. J. M. Christie, K. Hitomi, A. S. Arvai et al., “Structural tuning of the fluorescent protein iLOV for improved photostability,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 287, no. 26, pp. 22295–22304, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. A. Mukherjee, J. Walker, K. B. Weyant, and C. M. Schroeder, “Characterization of flavin-based fluorescent proteins: an emerging class of fluorescent reporters,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 5, Article ID e64753, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. G. Khrenova, A. V. Nemukhin, and T. Domratcheva, “Theoretical characterization of the flavin-based fluorescent protein iLOV and its Q489K mutant,” The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 119, no. 16, pp. 5176–5183, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. Chapman, C. Faulkner, E. Kaiserli et al., “The photoreversible fluorescent protein iLOV outperforms GFP as a reporter of plant virus infection,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 50, pp. 20038–20043, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. A. Cheuk and M. Houde, “A rapid and efficient method for uniform gene expression using the barley stripe mosaic virus,” Plant Methods, vol. 13, article 24, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. J. Röder, R. Fischer, and U. Commandeur, “Adoption of the 2A ribosomal skip principle to tobacco mosaic virus for peptide display,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 8, article 1125, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. U. K. Laemmli, “Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4,” Nature, vol. 227, no. 5259, pp. 680–685, 1970. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. S. Chapman, G. Hills, J. Watts, and D. Baulcombe, “Mutational analysis of the coat protein gene of potato virus X: effects on virion morphology and viral pathogenicity,” Virology, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 223–230, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. Tilsner, O. Linnik, M. Louveaux, I. M. Roberts, S. N. Chapman, and K. J. Oparka, “Replication and trafficking of a plant virus are coupled at the entrances of plasmodesmata,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 201, no. 7, pp. 981–995, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. S. Santa Cruz, A. G. Roberts, D. A. M. Prior, S. Chapman, and K. J. Oparka, “Cell-to-cell and phloem-mediated transport of potato virus X: The role of virions,” The Plant Cell, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 495–510, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. O. Linnik, J. Liesche, J. Tilsner, and K. J. Oparka, “Unraveling the structure of viral replication complexes at super-resolution,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 4, article 6, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. Tilsner, O. Linnik, K. M. Wright et al., “The TGB1 movement protein of potato virus X reorganizes actin and endomembranes into the X-body, a viral replication factory,” Plant Physiology, vol. 158, no. 3, pp. 1359–1370, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Bendahmane, M. Koo, E. Karrer, and R. N. Beachy, “Display of epitopes on the surface of tobacco mosaic virus: Impact of charge and isoelectric point of the epitope on virus-host interactions,” Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 290, no. 1, pp. 9–20, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. C. Porta, V. E. Spall, K. C. Findlay, R. C. Gergerich, C. E. Farrance, and G. P. Lomonossoff, “Cowpea mosaic virus-based chimaeras: Effects of inserted peptides on the phenotype, host range, and transmissibility of the modified viruses,” Virology, vol. 310, no. 1, pp. 50–63, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. X. Shu, V. Lev-Ram, T. J. Deerinck et al., “A genetically encoded tag for correlated light and electron microscopy of intact cells, tissues, and organisms,” PLoS Biology, vol. 9, no. 4, Article ID e1001041, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. M. R. Fernández-Fernández, J. L. Martínez-Torrecuadrada, J. I. Casal, and J. A. García, “Development of an antigen presentation sytem based on plum pox potyvirus,” FEBS Letters, vol. 427, no. 2, pp. 229–235, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. C. Porta, V. E. Spall, J. Loveland, J. E. Johnson, P. J. Barker, and G. P. Lomonossoff, “Development of Cowpea Mosaic Virus as a High-Yielding System for the Presentation of Foreign Peptides,” Virology, vol. 202, no. 2, pp. 949–955, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. S. Werner, S. Marillonnet, G. Hause, V. Klimyuk, and Y. Gleba, “Immunoabsorbent nanoparticles based on a tobamovirus displaying protein A,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, no. 47, pp. 17678–17683, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. G. A. Luke, H. Escuin, P. D. Felipe, and M. D. Ryan, “2A to the fore–research, technology and applications,” Biotechnology & Genetic Engineering Reviews, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 223–260, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. E. Minskaia, J. Nicholson, and M. D. Ryan, “Optimisation of the foot-and-mouth disease virus 2A co-expression system for biomedical applications,” BMC Biotechnology, vol. 13, article 67, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. R. L. S. Forster, D. L. Beck, P. J. Guilford, D. M. Voot, C. J. Van Dolleweerd, and M. T. Andersen, “Thecoat protein of white clover mosaic potexvirus has a role in facilitating cell-to-cell transport in plants,” Virology, vol. 191, no. 1, pp. 480–484, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. O. N. Fedorkin, A. G. Solovyev, N. E. Yelina et al., “Cell-to-cell movement of potato virus X involves distinct functions of the coat protein,” Journal of General Virology, vol. 82, part 2, pp. 449–458, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. O. N. Fedorkin, A. Merits, J. Lucchesi et al., “Complementation of the movement-deficient mutations in potato virus X: Potyvirus coat protein mediates cell-to-cell trafficking of C-terminal truncation but not deletion mutant of potexvirus coat protein,” Virology, vol. 270, no. 1, pp. 31–42, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. K. J. Oparka, A. G. Roberts, I. M. Roberts, D. A. M. Prior, and S. S. Cruz, “Viral coat protein is targeted to, but does not gate, plasmodesmata during cell-to-cell movement of potato virus X,” The Plant Journal, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 805–813, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. M. Christie, “Phototropin blue-light receptors,” Annual Review of Plant Biology, vol. 58, pp. 21–45, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. X. Dang, S. Chalkias, and I. J. Koralnik, “JC virus-iLOV fluorescent strains enable the detection of early and late viral protein expression,” Journal of Virological Methods, vol. 223, pp. 25–29, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2018 Juliane Röder et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

1331 Views | 488 Downloads | 4 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.