BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 2389485 | 11 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2389485

Effects of Xingnaojing Injection on Adenosinergic Transmission and Orexin Signaling in Lateral Hypothalamus of Ethanol-Induced Coma Rats

Academic Editor: Eiichi Kumamoto
Received18 Jan 2019
Revised08 Mar 2019
Accepted31 Mar 2019
Published27 Jun 2019

Abstract

Acute alcohol exposure induces unconscious condition such as coma whose main physical manifestation is the loss of righting reflex (LORR). Xingnaojing Injection (XNJI), which came from Chinese classic formula An Gong Niu Huang Pill, is widely used for consciousness disorders in China, such as coma. Although XNJI efficiently shortened the duration of LORR induced by acute ethanol, it remains unknown how XNJI acts on ethanol-induced coma (EIC). We performed experiments to examine the effects of XNJI on orexin and adenosine (AD) signaling in the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA) in EIC rats. Results showed that XNJI reduced the duration of LORR, which implied that XNJI promotes recovery form coma. Microdialysis data indicated that acute ethanol significantly increased AD release in the LHA but had no effect on orexin A levels. The qPCR results displayed a significant reduction in the Orexin-1 receptors (OX1R) expression with a concomitant increase in the A1 receptor (A1R) and equilibrative nucleoside transporter type 1 (ENT1) expression in EIC rats. In contrast, XNJI reduced the extracellular AD levels but orexin A levels remained unaffected. XNJI also counteracted the downregulation of the OX1R expression and upregulation of A1R and ENT1 expression caused by EIC. As for ADK expression, XNJI but not ethanol, displayed an upregulation in the LHA in EIC rats. Based on these results, we suggest that XNJI promotes arousal by inhibiting adenosine neurotransmission via reducing AD level and the expression of A1R and ENT1.

1. Introduction

Acute alcohol binge drinking leading to ethanol-induced coma (EIC) has become extremely prevalent [1], the main symptom which is the loss of righting reflex (LORR). The economic burden caused by alcohol is almost to be 1-3% of total health costs in the global [2]. Extensive studies suggest that EIC has negative effects on many structures and their functions. EIC impairs cognitive control and hematopoietic tissues and increases the risk of infectious diseases particularly pneumonia [36]. In addition, alcohol causes many health problems, including traumatic brain injury, liver disease and cancer [79]. Since alcohol is available to anyone, both acute alcohol and chronic alcohol are paired with negative consequences in individuals, families, and society [10, 11].

The lateral hypothalamic area (LHA), which is rich in orexin neurons, plays a central role in the regulation of arousal. To some degree, the wakefulness promotion of the LHA is attributed to orexin neurons. Orexin A and orexin B, derived from the same precursor, are synthesized in these neurons and bind to two G-protein coupled receptors, orexin-1 and orexin-2 [12]. Orexin-1 receptors (OX1R) selectively bind to orexin A, whereas orexin-2 receptors (OX2R) show the equal affinity to both orexin A and orexin B [13]. Orexin system is involved to physiological functions including sleep-wakefulness, energy homeostasis, and pathological states, such as coma and drug abuse [14, 15]. The loss of orexin neurons or OX1R blockade results in a reduced wakefulness and prolonged total sleep time [16, 17]. In contrast, activation of orexinergic transmission, such as orexin A administration, exerts wakefulness promotion [18]. Although most studies have identified that the orexin signaling promotes wakefulness, how the orexin transmission acts on EIC still remains poorly understood.

Adenosine (AD), a sleep-promoting neuromodulator, has a role in mediating many neuronal and behavioral effects of ethanol [1921]. Considerable evidence suggests that acute ethanol increases the extracellular AD level acted on the A1 receptor (A1R) and receptor (R) to inhibit the wakefulness-maintaining neurons [2226]. Among adenosine receptors contributing to sleep induction, A1R and R have been widely observed in many studies [22, 2628]. Administration of the selective A1R antagonist DPX or DPCPX reduces the nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep [21, 25], and administration of the selective R agonist CGS21680 increases the NREM sleep [29].

Ethanol is well-known to increase the extracellular adenosine levels [21]. One reason why acute ethanol increases the extracellular AD is to inhibit AD uptake via equilibrative nucleoside transporter type 1 (ENT1) which is a bidirectional transporter for nucleosides including AD [30]. Ethanol dependent rats display a significant reduction in both A1R and ENT1 expression in the basal forebrain during withdrawal [31]. Furthermore, Choi and colleagues suggest that the increase in voluntary ethanol intake in ENT1-null mice may be due to the profound decrease in A1R signaling but not a defect in A1R function [32]. In addition, inhibition of adenosine kinase (ADK) reduces the AD metabolisms, which may also induce increased extracellular AD levels.

Xingnaojing injection (XNJI), extracted from a classic Chinese emergency prescription called An Gong Niu Huang Pill, is one of the most widely used traditional Chinese Medicine Patent Prescription in emergency room in China. The function of XNJI is related to clean heat-toxic, promote blood flow and ameliorate brain function [33]. XNJI has good therapeutic effects on the consciousness diseases including stroke and all kinds of coma in both clinical trials and experimental studies because of its brain protection [3436]. According to meta-analysis, XNJI has a significant benefit on recovery compared to conventional drugs treatment in unconscious patients by improving hemorrheology and neurological deficit, reducing serum TNF-α level [35, 37, 38]. EIC induces a sudden unconscious condition that threatens one or more organic systems. Although XNJI is the most commonly used emergency aid for hangover in China, little is known about the neural mechanism mediating the effects of XNJI on EIC.

We have previously shown that acute ethanol intake causes a decrease in extracellular glutamate and increase in extracellular γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) in the LHA which are reversed by XNJI treatment [39]. In addition to glutamate/GABA signaling, we hypothesized that XNJI may play an important role in EIC by altering adenosine neurotransmission and orexin signaling. Therefore, we focused our attention on understanding the role of adenosine and orexin signaling on EIC following XNJI administration.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Drugs

The absolute ethyl alcohol was purchased from Guangzhou chemical reagent factory (Guangzhou, China). A 34% (v/v, in water) solution was made fresh on the day of the experiment and administered at a dose of 3.76 g/kg. Artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF = NaCl 145 mM, KCl 2.7 mM, MgCl2 1.0 mM, and CaCl2 1.2 mM; pH=7.4) was prepared fresh on the day of the experiment. All salts used for ASCF preparation were purchased from Guangzhou chemical reagent factory (Guangzhou, China). Adenosine standards was purchased from Purechem-Standard Co., Ltd. (Chengdu, China). XNJI was purchased from Jiminkexin Pharmaceutical Company (batch number: 161216; Wuxi, China) with the China Food and Drug Administration number Z32020562. XNJI is approved by China Food and Drug Administration [34] and its components are as follows: 1 mL XNJI contains 7.5 mg Moschus (Moschus berezovskii Flerov), 1 mg borneolum (Blumea balsamifera (L.) DC.), 30 mg Curcumae radix (Curcuma aromatica Salisb), and 30 mg Gardeniae fructus (Gardenia jasminoides J. Ellis), which suggests that the concentration of XNJI is 68.5 mg/mL. To guarantee the quality and stability of the XNJI, we assayed the volatile components in Moschus and borneol by gas chromatography (GC) and nonvolatile components in Curcuma aromatic Salisb and Gardenia jasminoides J. Ellis by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The concentrations of the four volatile components were 0.087 mg/mL muscone, 1.11 mg/mL borneol, 0.054 mg/mL isoborneol, and 0.078 mg/mL camphor. The concentrations of the four nonvolatile components were 2.83 μg/mL jasminoidin, 0.36 μg/mL curcumin, 0.14 μg/mL demethoxycurcumin, and 0.50 μg/mL bisdemethoxycurcumin. For the detailed protocol conditions see our previous experiment [39]. The voucher specimens were deposited at Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (Guangzhou, China).

2.2. Animals and Grouping

Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats (200 g-300 g, Guangdong Medical Experimental Animal Center, China) were housed in an animal facility with ambient temperature and humidity and ad libitum access to food and water. Rats were randomly assigned to five groups (n=6 per group): control group, ethanol-induced coma group (EIC), low dose of XNJI group (XNJI-L), middle dose of XNJI group (XNJI-M), and high dose of XNJI group (XNJI-H). All experimental protocols were conducted according to the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Animal Experimentation Committee at the Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine.

2.3. Surgery

Anesthetized with chloral hydrate (10%; 0.35 g/kg; i.p.), the rats were placed on the stereotaxic apparatus (Ruiwode, Shenzhen, China). A guide cannula (CMA, Stockholm, Sweden) was implanted unilaterally at 90° angle above the LHA (target coordinates were: AP= -3.3 mm, ML= -1.5 mm, DV= -8.5 mm, including probe membrane length [40]). After the surgery, penicillin sodium was administrated subcutaneously, used as an antibiotic to prevent infection.

2.4. Ethanol Consumption, XNJI Administration and Microdialysis Sampling

After 2 days of postoperative recovery, a microdialysis probe (CMA/12, 2 mm membrane length; CMA Microdialysis, Stockholm, Sweden) was inserted into the LHA through the guide cannula. Before ethanol and XNJI administration, ACSF was perfused at a flow rate = 2 μL/min with a CMA 402 microdialysis pump (CMA, Stockholm, Sweden). The delay between the time adenosine and orexin A diffused into the probe and when the dialysate reached the tubing outlet is 9 min. 2 × 45min pretreatment baseline samples (90 μL/ sample) were collected after one-hour perfusion for equilibrium. Then, the control rats were given saline i.p. while others were treated with ethanol [34% (v/v, in water); 3.76 g/kg, i.p.] 20 minutes before XNJI microinjection. Subsequently, the saline and three doses of XNJI were given by unilaterally intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection via the stereotaxic apparatus, respectively. Briefly, control group and EIC group were treated with saline (10μL/kg), XNJI-L group was treated with 0.34mg/kg XNJI, XNJI-M group was given 0.68mg/kg XNJI, and XNJI-H group was given 1.36mg/kg XNJI according to the body weight. Subsequently, ACSF was perfused and 6 × 45 min posttreatment samples were collected. The flow rate was maintained at 2 μL/min during the whole experiment. The dialysate samples were stored in ice until analyzed. On completion, animals were euthanized and hypothalamus was removed and stored in −80°C for the further analysis of gene expression.

2.5. Loss of Righting Reflex Test

Rats were treated with ethanol [34% (v/v, in water); 3.76 g/kg] by intraperitoneal administration (i.p.), which results in the LORR in animals. LORR means to fail to correct its posture while lying on its back. Duration of LORR was the time interval that measured from the appearance of LORR to recovery of righting reflex after acute ethanol exposure.

2.6. Measurement of Extracellular Adenosine and Orexin A

The microdialysis samples were analyzed by HPLC coupled with an ultraviolet (UV) detector [24, 41]. In brief, 20 μL samples were injected into the HPLC. Adenosine was separated out with a Gemini 5 μ C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, Phenomenex, CA, USA) and detected by UV detector (Agilent 1260 infinity, Agilent Technologies Inc.; California, USA) at 260 nm wavelength. The mobile phase contained 8 mm NaH2PO4 and 20% methanol (flow rate = 1 mL/min) revised by others [42]. The chromatogram data was acquired and analyzed by Agilent OpenLab system (Agilent Technologies Inc.; California, USA). Comparing its retention time and area under the peak to the AD standards, adenosine peak in the microdialysis samples was identified and quantified.

Another 50 μL samples were used to measure orexin A levels with an orexin A ELISA Kit (Cusabio Biotech Co., LTD, Wuhan, China) following manufacturer’ s instructions.

2.7. Effects of XNJI on OX1 R, A1R, ENT1, and ADK Gene Expression in Acute Ethanol Exposed Rats

Total RNA was extracted from tissue samples by Trizol reagent (Takara, Dalian, China). The protocol in detail was described in previous study [39]. In brief, RNA was extracted by Trizol reagent and purified by chloroform and isopropanol followed by washing with 75% ethanol. Subsequently, RNA was dissolved with RNase-free water. The RNA purity and concentration were analyzed with Nano UV-3000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA) and the concentration was used to calculate the amount of RNA needed.

Total RNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA with Bestar™ qPCR RT Kit (DBI® Bioscience, Shanghai, China) as instructions. The cDNA was used to process for real-time PCR. All cDNA samples were run in triplicate and the Bestar™ qPCR MasterMix (DBI® Bioscience, Shanghai, China) was used as instructions. OX1R, A1R, ENT1, and ADK were the target genes and β-actin, the housekeeping gene, was used as an internal control. All primers were designed by Doclab Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Guangzhou, China). For each sample, a 20 μL reaction mixture containing 10 μL of Bestar ® SybrGreen qPCR mastermix (DBI® Bioscience), 0.5 μL of forward primer (10 μM), 0.5 μL of reverse primer (10 μM) (primer sequences are described in Table 1), 1 μL of cDNA, and 8 μL RNase-free water were prepared and then performed to amplification using Applied Biosystems StepOnePlus™ Real-Time PCR System (Foster city, CA, USA).


Oligo NameSequence(5′-3′)

OX1R-FGATGCTGATGGTGGTTCTG
OX1R-RCAGGAGAATGCAGCCTTGAA
A1R-FAACATTGGGCCACAGACCTA
A1R-RGACTCGGAGGTATCGATCCA
ENT1-FCGGAGCCTCACAGCTATTTG
ENT1-RGCCATGAAGGTGATGAACCA
ADK-FGCATTTGTAGGAGGGTTTCT
ADK-RGTACAGCCAGTTCGCCTAAT
β-actin-FAGGGAAATCGTGCGTGACAT
β-actin-RGAACCGCTCATTGCCGATAG

The relative fold change in mRNA expressions among control, EIC, and three experimental group animals was calculated by the method [14, 43].

2.8. Statistical Analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA; SPSS, Chicago, USA) followed by the LSD post hoc test was performed to examine the effect of local XNJI administration on extracellular orexin A and AD release and gene expression in the LHA. All data were shown as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). P< 0.05 is the level of significance.

3. Results

3.1. Loss of Righting Reflex

One-way ANOVA revealed a difference of duration of LORR among groups (F= 3.564, df (total)= 23, P <0.05; Figure 1). Further Fisher’s LSD analysis indicated that posttreatment with XNJI-M significantly shortened the duration of LORR (Mean±SEM= 2.92±0.24, P <0.05; LSD post hoc test) as compared to EIC group (Mean±SEM= 4.26±0.56), whereas XNJI-L (Mean±SEM=3.92±0.68) and XNJI-H (Mean± SEM= 3.59±1.16) did not display any significant decrease in LORR duration (P >0.05; LSD post hoc test).

3.2. Effect on Levels of Orexin A in LHA

The baseline orexin A levels (Mean±SEM; n=6) in each group were as follows: control group = 77.7±7.9 ng/L; EIC group = 90.2±10.2 ng/L; XNJI-L = 104.5±12.4 ng/L; XNJI-M = 101.1±15.9 ng/L; XNJI-H = 81.5±11.1 ng/L. One-way ANOVA depicted that a nonsignificant effect was observed in extracellular orexin A levels among five groups (Figure 2). As compared to control group, the orexin A levels in the LHA in EIC group remained unaffected (P >0.05; LSD post hoc test; Figure 2(a)). Post-XNJI treatment did not display any change in orexin A levels during the whole experiment (P >0.05; LSD post hoc test). These results demonstrate that orexin A levels do not decrease with acute ethanol intake and that the increased duration of LORR in these rats occurs independently of orexin A levels in the LHA.

3.3. Effect on Levels of AD in LHA

Comparing the retention time and area under the peak to the AD standards, AD in the dialysates was identified and quantified (Figures 3(a)3(d)). As compared to the area under the peak of control, that of EIC was increased. As compared to the EIC, the area under the peak of XNJI-M was decreased, which suggests that ethanol increased the extracellular AD level and XNJI decreased the AD levels. The baseline AD levels (Mean±SEM; n=6) in each group were as follow: control group = 135.3±14.1 nmol/L; EIC group = 142.1±20.5 nmol/L; XNJI-L = 149.5±12.0 nmol/L; XNJI-M = 136.9±13.1 nmol/L; XNJI-H = 134.8±12.2 nmol/L. There was no significant difference in baseline extracellular AD levels among groups. The control group did not display any change in AD levels during the whole experiment, whereas EIC group showed a significant increase in AD levels during the first 135 minutes. Although the AD levels during the postethanol perfusion were higher (P <0.05; LSD post hoc test) than the baseline AD levels, they were in a steady decline (Figure 3(e)). One-way ANOVA indicated XNJI-M significantly decreased the levels of extracellular AD during the last 135 minutes (P <0.05; LSD post hoc test; Figure 3(g)) as compared to the EIC group. Although there was a decrease in AD levels in XNJI-L group, it did not reach significance (P >0.05; LSD post hoc test; Figure 3(f)). The AD levels in XNJI-H group and EIC group were comparable during the experiment (P >0.05; LSD post hoc test; Figure 3(h)).

3.4. Effect on Expression of OX1R, A1R, ENT1, and ADK in LHA

During the experiment, there was a significant reduction in OX1R expression (P <0.05, LSD post hoc test) and increase in A1R expression (P <0.01, LSD post hoc test) in the LHA of EIC group as compared to control group. As compared to EIC group, all doses of XNJI induced a significant increase in OX1R expression (P <0.05; LSD post hoc test; Figure 4(a)) and dose-dependently decreased A1R expression (P <0.05; LSD post hoc test; Figure 4(b)). In addition, ethanol also upregulated ENT1 expression in the LHA in EIC group whereas ENT1 expression was downregulated in XNJI-M group (P <0.05; LSD post hoc test; Figure 4(c)). Interestingly, the upregulation of ADK expression was not induced by ethanol but XNJI-H (P <0.01; LSD post hoc test; Figure 4(d)).

4. Discussions

This is the first study implicating an interaction of XNJI and EIC via AD and orexin signaling. The results of our study demonstrate that (1) XNJI reduced the duration of LORR; (2) acute ethanol and XNJI do not affect the extracellular orexin A levels in the LHA; (3) acute ethanol intake increases the extracellular AD release which can be rescued by XNJI; (4) XNJI offsets the downregulation of OX1R and ADK gene expression and upregulation of A1R and ENT1 gene expression in the LHA caused by EIC. Based on these results, we believe that XNJI may perform wake-promotion effects mainly by reducing AD signaling.

We performed experiments at light onset. On one hand, humans usually drink at night and rats are active at night but sleep at day, so we performed experiments during daytime to imitate human behaviors. On the other hand, extracellular AD levels are highest at light onset. In contrast, AD levels are the lowest at dark onset, which makes it difficult to monitor XNJI induced reduction of extracellular AD in the LHA. Furthermore, extracellular orexin A level may be the highest at dark onset and may not increase further after XNJI administration following ethanol intake. In order to amplify the efficacy of XNJI, we conducted our experiments during the light period when the rats are minimally active. In our experiment, XNJI was administrated by i.c.v. because it allows for delivering drugs with precise control in specific brain.

Our results showed that XNJI shortened the duration of LORR, which means that XNJI promotes wakefulness. XNJI did not display a significant increase in extracellular orexin A, whereas OX1R gene expression in the LHA was significantly increased after XNJI administration in ethanol-treated rats, suggesting that both XNJI and ethanol have no effect on extracellular orexin A but alter the expression of OX1R in the LHA, which may act on the recovery of EIC. Jia et al. found that both orexin A and orexin B decreased the duration of LORR caused by ethanol [18]. Endogenous orexin A level in LORR condition is very low that may be difficult to be detected [4447]. OX1R antagonism has a therapeutic effect on stress and hyperarousal states, which means that OX1R plays a role in arousal [48]. Orexin A levels are low in daytime in rats, so orexin A in EIC rats may be even lower that XNJI may not cause any changes to orexin A levels in the LHA. Even though all doses of XNJI increased OX1R gene expression, the small size effect would not activate orexin signaling without an increased orexin A levels.

Our experiments were designed to examine whether XNJI conducts arousal effects following acute ethanol exposure. Strong and compelling evidence suggests that ethanol acts directly in the brain to increase extracellular AD [31, 49], which is consistent with our results. Neurotransmitters that mediate the sleepiness and wakefulness are regulated by two interrelated regulatory processes: circadian and homeostatic [50, 51]. Jia et al. found that the EEG delta power was almost immediately increased after EIC [18]. EEG delta power, an electrophysiological indicator of slow wave sleep [52], directly represents the brain activity and is more easily monitored for short-term changes. AD, a biochemical indicator of sleep, is regulated by multiple factors and its concentration is the final result of the neurotransmission regulation. So its concentration may not change in a short period of time. In addition, XNJI may counteract the increased AD transmission caused by EIC at first 135 min, but the effect of XNJI is greater than the effect of EIC in the last 135 min.

As is known, AD, a breakdown product of ATP metabolism, corresponds to increased sleep pressure. Since acute ethanol increases extracellular AD levels whereas the AD levels in control group remain unchanged in the whole experiment, it is unlikely that the increase of AD levels is the result of sleep pressure. Furthermore, both the influx and efflux contribute to the homeostatic control of extracellular AD, which indicates that the accumulation of extracellular AD is the result of increased ATP metabolism or decreased AD uptake. Nagy and colleagues suggest that ethanol increases extracellular AD by inhibiting AD uptake via the nucleoside transporter [30]. AD can permeate biological membranes via selected AD transporter proteins. ENT1 is relatively well-developed in pharmacology as compared to other equilibrative transporter proteins and has often been identified as a major player in purinergic signaling. ENT1 mediates both AD influx and efflux [53, 54]. Our results suggest that acute ethanol upregulates ENT1 expression but does not affect ADK expression which contributes to AD metabolism, while XNJI-M downregulates ENT1 expression and XNJI-H upregulates ADK expression after EIC happened. These results imply that acute ethanol may increase extracellular AD by promoting efflux and XNJI may eliminate extracellular AD via promoting influx and intercellular metabolism.

It is reported that AD, via A1R, interacts with orexin signaling to promote sleep [55, 56]. In addition, R is also responsible for sleep induction [29, 57]. Because Rs are rich in the striatum and have low expression in the LHA, so we did not measure the R expression in our experiments. Our results showed that XNJI attenuates the EIC via decreasing extracellular AD levels and downregulating the A1R expression, suggesting that XNJI acts on arousal promotion by inhibiting A1R activation in the LHA. These findings clearly demonstrate the importance of adenosinergic mechanisms in altering EIC.

ATP plays a vital role in sleep-wake regulation and may dedicate to extracellular AD levels [5860]. Does ethanol mediate ATP changes in the brain? Does XNJI affect the brain energy levels to mediate extracellular AD? Can we get the same results in other sleep-wake centers? These are interesting, yet unanswered, questions that we will address in our further studies. Our results did not show a significant effect of XNJI on orexin signaling, but it does not mean that XNJI have no effects on regulation of orexin system. We need to do more experiments to draw a conclusion on whether XNJI acts on orexin signaling.

5. Conclusions

In our studies, orexin A remained unchanged in the whole experiment but the expression of OX1R had significant changes among groups. In addition, XNJI acts on adenosinergic mechanisms to promote arousal via altering extracellular AD levels and the expression of A1R and ENT1. Based on these results, we may draw a conclusion that XNJI promotes recovery from EIC by inhibiting adenosine neurotransmission via reducing AD level and the expression of A1R and ENT1.

Abbreviations

ACSF:Artificial cerebrospinal fluid
AD:Adenosine
ADK:Adenosine kinase
A1R:A1 receptor
ENT1:Equilibrative nucleoside transporter type 1
GABA:γ-aminobutyric acid
HPLC:High performance liquid chromatography
i.c.v.:Intracerebroventricular
LHA:Hypothalamic area
OX1R:Orexin-1 receptors
qPCR:Quantitative real-time PCR
XNJI:Xingnaojing injection.

Data Availability

All original data in this manuscript are available from the author.

Additional Points

List of Compounds. Muscone, borneol, isoborneol, camphor, jasminoidin, curcumin, demethoxycurcumin, and bisdemethoxycurcumin

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest in this study.

Authors’ Contributions

Xiao-Tong Chen conducted microdialysis experiment and wrote draft of manuscript, Xiao-Ge Wang and Li-Yuan Xie conducted microdialysis experiment and revised manuscript, Jia-Wen Huang conducted animal experiment, Wei Zhao conducted HPLC experiment, Qi Wang and Li-Mei Yao analyzed data and corrected the manuscript, and Wei-Rong Li planed and controlled all studies and wrote and revised manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Institute of Clinical Pharmacology and Lingnan Medical Research Center of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine and funded by National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 81573638) and Guangdong Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 2016A030313859 and no. 2017A030313666).

References

  1. CDC, “Vital signs: binge drinking prevalence, frequency, and intensity among adults - United States, 2010,” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 14–19, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  2. B. Baumberg, “The global economic burden of alcohol: A review and some suggestions,” Drug and Alcohol Review, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 537–551, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Field, R. W. Wiers, P. Christiansen, M. T. Fillmore, and J. C. Verster, “Acute alcohol effects on inhibitory control and implicit cognition: implications for loss of control over drinking,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1346–1352, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. C. Kung, D. L. Hoyert, J. Xu, and S. L. Murphy, “Deaths: final data for 2005,” Products - National Vital Statistics Reports, vol. 56, no. 10, p. 120, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  5. P. Zhang, G. J. Bagby, K. I. Happel, C. E. Raasch, and S. Nelson, “Alcohol abuse, immunosuppression, and pulmonary infection,” Current Drug Abuse Reviews, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–67, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. E. H. Heermans, “Booze and blood: the effects of acute and chronic alcohol abuse on the hematopoietic system,” Clinical Laboratory Science, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 229–232, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  7. J. D. Corrigan, “Substance abuse as a mediating factor in outcome from traumatic brain injury,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 302–309, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. R. Teschke, “Alcoholic liver disease: alcohol metabolism, cascade of molecular mechanisms, cellular targets, and clinical aspects,” Biomedicines, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 106, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. H. K. Na and J. Y. Lee, “Molecular basis of alcohol-related gastric and colon cancer,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 18, no. 6, p. 1116, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. E. E. Bouchery, H. J. Harwood, J. J. Sacks, C. J. Simon, and R. D. Brewer, “Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the U.S., 2006,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 516–524, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. I. O. Ebrahim, C. M. Shapiro, A. J. Williams, and P. B. Fenwick, “Alcohol and sleep I: effects on normal sleep,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 539–549, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. de Lecea, T. S. Kilduff, C. Peyron et al., “The hypocretins: hypothalamus-specific peptides with neuroexcitatory activity,” Proceedings of the National Acadamy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 322–327, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Sakurai, A. Amemiya, M. Ishii et al., “Orexins and orexin receptors: a family of hypothalamic neuropeptides and G protein-coupled receptors that regulate feeding behavior,” Cell, vol. 92, no. 4, pp. 573–585, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Chen, M. M. Thakkar, S. Winston, Y. Bolortuya, R. Basheer, and R. W. McCarley, “REM sleep changes in rats induced by siRNA-mediated orexin knockdown,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 2039–2048, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. J. Hara, C. T. Beuckmann, T. Nambu et al., “Genetic ablation of orexin neurons in mice results in narcolepsy, hypophagia, and obesity,” Neuron, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 345–354, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. E. Murillo-Rodriguez, M. Liu, C. Blanco-Centurion, and P. J. Shiromani, “Effects of hypocretin (orexin) neuronal loss on sleep and extracellular adenosine levels in the rat basal forebrain,” European Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1191–1198, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. I. Smith, D. C. Piper, M. S. Duxon, and N. Upton, “Evidence implicating a role for orexin-1 receptor modulation of paradoxical sleep in the rat,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 341, no. 3, pp. 256–258, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. X. Jia, J. Yan, J. Xia et al., “Arousal effects of orexin A on acute alcohol intoxication-induced coma in rats,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 775–783, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. P. M. Newton and R. O. Messing, “Intracellular signaling pathways that regulate behavioral responses to ethanol,” Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 109, no. 1-2, pp. 227–237, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. L. C. Batista, R. D. S. Prediger, G. S. Morato, and R. N. Takahashi, “Blockade of adenosine and dopamine receptors inhibits the development of rapid tolerance to ethanol in mice,” Psychopharmacology, vol. 181, no. 4, pp. 714–721, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. Sharma, P. Sahota, and M. M. Thakkar, “Role of adenosine and the orexinergic perifornical hypothalamus in sleep-promoting effects of ethanol,” SLEEP, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 525–533, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. M. S. Dar, “Modulation of ethanol-induced motor incoordination by mouse striatal A1 adenosinergic receptor,” Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 513–520, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Rai, S. Kumar, M. A. Alam, R. Szymusiak, D. McGinty, and M. N. Alam, “A1 receptor mediated adenosinergic regulation of perifornical-lateral hypothalamic area neurons in freely behaving rats,” Neuroscience, vol. 167, no. 1, pp. 40–48, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Sharma, S. C. Engemann, P. Sahota, and M. M. Thakkar, “Effects of ethanol on extracellular levels of adenosine in the basal forebrain: An in vivo microdialysis study in freely behaving rats,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 813–818, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. M. M. Thakkar, S. C. Engemann, R. Sharma, and P. Sahota, “Role of wake-promoting basal forebrain and adenosinergic mechanisms in sleep-promoting effects of ethanol,” Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 997–1005, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. M. Thakkar, S. Winston, and R. W. McCarley, “A1 receptor and adenosinergic homeostatic regulation of sleep-wakefulness: Effects of antisense to the A1 receptor in the cholinergic basal forebrain,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 23, no. 10, pp. 4278–4287, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. Z.-L. Huang, Z. Zhang, and W.-M. Qu, “Roles of adenosine and its receptors in sleep-wake regulation,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 119, pp. 349–371, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. Zhang, Q. Xu, X. Yuan et al., “Projections of nucleus accumbens adenosine A2A receptor neurons in the mouse brain and their implications in mediating sleep-wake regulation,” Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, vol. 7, p. 43, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. Z.-Y. Hong, Z.-L. Huang, W.-M. Qu, N. Eguchi, Y. Urade, and O. Hayaishi, “An adenosine A receptor agonist induces sleep by increasing GABA release in the tuberomammillary nucleus to inhibit histaminergic systems in rats,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 1542–1549, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. E. Nagy, I. Diamond, D. J. Casso, C. Franklin, and A. S. Gordon, “Ethanol increases extracellular adenosine by inhibiting adenosine uptake via the nucleoside transporter,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 4, pp. 1946–1951, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  31. R. Sharma, S. Engemann, P. Sahota, and M. M. Thakkar, “Role of adenosine and wake-promoting basal forebrain in insomnia and associated sleep disruptions caused by ethanol dependence,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 115, no. 3, pp. 782–794, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D.-S. Choi, M.-G. Cascini, W. Mailliard et al., “The type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter regulates ethanol intoxication and preference,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 855–861, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. F. Guo, X. W. Lu, and Q. P. Xu, “Protective effect of Xingnaojing and Xuesaitong injections on cerebral ischemic reperfusion injury in rats,” Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi, vol. 90, no. 23, pp. 1645–1647, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  34. P. Xu, S.-Y. Du, Y. Lu et al., “The effect of stroke and other components in Xing-Nao-Jing on the pharmacokinetics of geniposide,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 152, no. 2, pp. 302–307, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. X. Ma, Y. X. Yang, N. Chen et al., “Meta-analysis for clinical evaluation of xingnaojing injection for the treatment of cerebral infarction,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 8, p. 485, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. Y. Zhang, X. Qu, J. Zhai et al., “Xingnaojing injection protects against cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury via PI3K/Akt-mediated eNOS phosphorylation,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2018, Article ID 2361046, 13 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. W. Peng, J. Yang, Y. Wang et al., “Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of xingnaojing treatment for stroke,” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2014, Article ID 210851, 9 pages, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Wu, H. Zhang, Y. Xing et al., “Meta-analysis of the effects of xingnaojing injection on consciousness disturbance,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 7, p. e2875, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Wei, L. Yao, L. Yang et al., “Alteration of glutamate/GABA balance during acute alcohol intoxication in rats: Effect of Xingnaojing injection,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 166, pp. 333–339, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. W. C. Paxinos, The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates, 2007.
  41. A. V. Kalinchuk, R. W. McCarley, D. Stenberg, T. Porkka-Heiskanen, and R. Basheer, “The role of cholinergic basal forebrain neurons in adenosine-mediated homeostatic control of sleep: Lessons from 192 IgG-saporin lesions,” Neuroscience, vol. 157, no. 1, pp. 238–253, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. J. T. McKenna, J. L. Tartar, C. P. Ward et al., “Sleep fragmentation elevates behavioral, electrographic and neurochemical measures of sleepiness,” Neuroscience, vol. 146, no. 4, pp. 1462–1473, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. T. D. Schmittgen and K. J. Livak, “Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method,” Nature Protocols, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 1101–1108, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. Nishino, B. Ripley, S. Overeem et al., “Low cerebrospinal fluid hypocretin (orexin) and altered energy homeostasis in human narcolepsy,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 381–388, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Y. Yasuda, A. Takeda, S. Fukuda et al., “Orexin a elicits arousal electroencephalography without sympathetic cardiovascular activation in isoflurane-anesthetized rats,” Anesthesia & Analgesia, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1663–1666, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. K. Rejdak, A. Petzold, L. Lin, M. Smith, N. Kitchen, and E. J. Thompson, “Decreased CSF hypocretin-1 (orexin-A) after acute haemorrhagic brain injury,” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 597-598, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. P. R. Castillo, E. Mignot, B. K. Woodruff, and B. F. Boeve, “Undetectable CSF hypocretin-1 in "Hashimoto's encephalopathy" associated with coma,” Neurology, vol. 62, no. 10, p. 1909, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. P. Bonaventure, S. Yun, P. L. Johnson et al., “A selective orexin-1 receptor antagonist attenuates stress-induced hyperarousal without hypnotic effects,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 352, no. 3, pp. 590–601, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. V. Dunwiddie and S. A. Masino, “The role and regulation of adenosine in the central nervous system,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 24, pp. 31–55, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. H. Landolt, J. V. Rétey, K. Tönz et al., “Caffeine attenuates waking and sleep electroencephalographic markers of sleep homeostasis in humans,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1933–1939, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. T. Curie, V. Mongrain, S. Dorsaz, G. M. Mang, Y. Emmenegger, and P. Franken, “Homeostatic and circadian contribution to EEG and molecular state variables of sleep regulation,” SLEEP, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 311–323, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. A. A. Borbely and P. Achermann, “Sleep homeostasis and models of sleep regulation,” Journal of Biological Rhythms, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 559–570, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. R. C. Boswell-Casteel and F. A. Hays, “Equilibrative nucleoside transporters—A review,” Nucleosides, Nucleotides and Nucleic Acids, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 7–30, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Pastor-Anglada and S. Pérez-Torras, “Who is who in adenosine transport,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 9, p. 627, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  55. M. M. Thakkar, S. C. Engemann, K. M. Walsh, and P. K. Sahota, “Adenosine and the homeostatic control of sleep: Effects of A1 receptor blockade in the perifornical lateral hypothalamus on sleep-wakefulness,” Neuroscience, vol. 153, no. 4, pp. 875–880, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. N. Alam, S. Kumar, S. Rai, M. Methippara, R. Szymusiak, and D. McGinty, “Role of adenosine A1 receptor in the perifornical-lateral hypothalamic area in sleep-wake regulation in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1304, pp. 96–104, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. Y. Q. Wang, R. Li, D. R. Wang et al., “Adenosine A2A receptors in the olfactory bulb suppress rapid eye movement sleep in rodents,” Brain Structure Function, vol. 222, no. 3, pp. 1351–1366, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. M. Dworak, T. Kim, R. W. McCarley, and R. Basheer, “Sleep, brain energy levels, and food intake: Relationship between hypothalamic ATP concentrations, food intake, and body weight during sleep-wake and sleep deprivation in rats,” Somnologie, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Dworak, R. W. McCarley, T. Kim, A. V. Kalinchuk, and R. Basheer, “Sleep and brain energy levels: ATP changes during sleep,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 30, no. 26, pp. 9007–9016, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. T. Kim, V. Ramesh, M. Dworak et al., “Disrupted sleep-wake regulation in type 1 equilibrative nucleoside transporter knockout mice,” Neuroscience, vol. 303, pp. 211–219, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Xiao-Tong Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

544 Views | 209 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.