BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 3698742 | 14 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3698742

Indirect Regeneration and Assessment of Genetic Fidelity of Acclimated Plantlets by SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD Markers in Rauwolfia tetraphylla L.: An Endangered Medicinal Plant

Academic Editor: Atanas Atanassov
Received14 Jan 2019
Accepted25 Mar 2019
Published11 Apr 2019

Abstract

Rauwolfia tetraphylla L. is an important medicinal plant species which is well known for its pharmaceutically important alkaloids. In the present study, we are reporting about its conservation by in vitro clonal multiplication through the standardized protocol of indirect regeneration by using leaf and stem based callus and assessment of genetic fidelity of acclimated plantlets by start codon targeted (SCoT), inter simple sequence repeats (ISSR), and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) marker based analysis. Initially friable callus was induced in maximum amounts (378.7, 323.8, and 412.8 in mg) from leaf, root, and stem explants on Murashige and Skoog (MS) media supplemented with 5.0 mg/L, 3.0 mg/L of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) and 5.0 mg/L of naphthalene acetic acid (NAA), respectively. Shoot regeneration with the maximum number of shoot buds (25 and 20) was obtained from leaf and stem calluses on MS media supplemented with TDZ (0.25 mg/L) + BAP (2 mg/L). The regenerated shoots were rooted successfully with maximum rooting percentage of 98.0 on full strength MS media amended with IAA (1.0 mg/L) and IBA (1.0 mg/L). The regenerated plantlets were hardened using 2:1 ratio of sterile garden soil and sand, followed by acclimatization in field conditions with 86% of survival. SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD primers based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was carried out to check possible genetic variations in micro propagated plants in comparison with mother plant. Among the ten SCoT (S), ISSR (R), and RAPD (OPA) primers used, S2, R10, and OPA3 has given good amplification with scorable DNA bands. The results revealed that the regenerated plants did not have any polymorphism with mother plant. Hence, the in vitro regenerated R. tetraphylla plantlets were confirmed as true-to-type.

1. Introduction

In India, Ayurveda is a traditional medicinal system which has been practiced for thousands of years and remains as one of the most ancient and yet living traditions across the country, which has a sound philosophical and experimental basis [1, 2]. India is also the largest producer of medicinal herbs and hence appropriately called as the Botanical Garden of the World [3]. Some of these medicinal plants have been featured on Indian postage stamps, where the first set of stamps came out in 1997, showing four different medicinal plants: Ghritkumari (Aloe barbadensis), Sarpagandha (Rauwolfia serpentina), Tulsi (Ocimum sanctum) and Haridra (Curcuma longa) [4] followed by another set of four medicinal plants: Brahmi (Bacopa monnieri), Guggulu (Commiphora wightii), Amla (Emblica officinallis), and Aswagandha (Withania somnifera) as postal stamps were released [5].

Presently, medicinal plants play a very important role in the modern economy of developing countries. In India, the medicinal plant related trade is estimated to be approximately US $ 1 billion per year [6]. Recent trends have indicated further increase in this trade with the herbal cosmetic and pharmaceutical industry playing a major role in fulfilling the demand for herbals worldwide. In addition to the international trade, there is a substantial volume of internal trade for medicinal plants in India, which has created a lot of demand to these medicinal herbs and shrubs [7].

Among the different plant families, Apocynaceae has gained lot of medicinal importance, as most of the plant species of this family produce milky sap which has pharmaceutical applications such as for gastrointestinal ailments, malaria, pain and diabetes [8]. Almost every part (roots, stem bark, leaves and latex) of Apocynaceae family members was used for several treatments and disorders like leprosy, dysentery, worms, ulcers, tumours, skin, and liver diseases [9].

Rauwolfia is an important genus in Apocynaceae family which has gained much popularity due to the presence of pharmaceutically significant alkaloids with higher concentrations in roots and stem bark. Approximately 130 species of Rauwolfia have been identified and are located mostly in tropical and semitropical regions. Among the different species, R. serpentina Benth. ex Kurz is indigenous to India [10, 11] and this species is on the verge of extinction [12] due to its overexploitation by ayurvedic practitioners and pharmaceutical industries [13] and Government of India has also restricted the exploitation of this endangered species [14]. In this scenario the attention of industrialists and medicinal practitioners was diverted to find an alternative plant species as a source of pharmaceutical alkaloids.

Among the other species of Rauwolfia, the most important is Rauwolfia tetraphylla L., which has gained lot of importance as an alternative source of reserpine and other alkaloids [15]. R. tetraphylla is native of tropical America and West Indies [16], but now it is naturalized [17] throughout the tropics which includes the moist deciduous forests of Southeast Asia including Burma, Bangladesh, India, Malaysia, and Srilanka [18]. The common names are wild snake root plant, devil pepper, be-still tree, American serpent wood, devil root, milk bush etc. It is being cultivated widely as both an ornamental and a source of pharmaceuticals. This species produces different type of pharmaceutically important alkaloids in their stem bark and roots such as reserpine, deserpidine, ajmalicine, ajmaline, canescine, yohimbine, and recinnamine [19, 20].

Due to presence of various commercial indole alkaloids, this plant species was also exploited during the last three decades and presently it is in endangered status [21]. Propagation of R. tetraphylla through vegetative cuttings and seed material is limited (5-10%) due to its poor rooting ability and due to presence of phenolic compounds in seed [22]. In view of the above facts about the mass exploitation of this plant from natural resources and due to its restricted cultivation, there is an urgent need to conserve this medicinally important plant species by proper conservation strategy. Hence, the present study is undertaken with the objective of mass propagation of R. tetraphylla through the standardized indirect regeneration protocol by utilizing leaf and stem based callus and to confirm the genetic fidelity of acclimated plants by using SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD primer based PCR analysis.

Even though there are some reports about its multiplication through nodal, shoot tip cultures [23] and in vitro flowering [24], but there is scanty information about its regeneration through callus based indirect regeneration protocols. In our previous report, we have used single type of cytokinin (TDZ) in regenerating the low frequency of multiple shoots from leaf and stem based callus [25]. Now, in this study we are reporting a protocol for its conservation through high frequency of plantlet production by using combination of cytokinins amended media.

2. Materials and Methods

In this study, most of materials and methods were followed as per the report on indirect regeneration studies in a Morus species [26].

2.1. Plant Material and Explant Source

Two-year-old R. tetraphylla plants available in the medicinal arboretum, Department of Biotechnology, Kakatiya University, were used as parent plant material in this in vitro propagation studies. Fully expanded leaf of about 7 cm in length and 4 cm in breadth, stem (internodal segments), and root parts were collected during the second week of June and were used as explants for the study.

2.2. Murashige and Skoog Media Preparation

MS medium [27] was prepared by using sucrose (3%) and appropriate quantities of vitamins, Iron, macronutrients, and micronutrients from stock solutions. Before dispensing the prepared medium to culture tubes, required concentrations and combinations of plant growth regulators were added to it from the hormonal stock solutions. The media was solidified with 0.8% Agar and pH was adjusted to 5.6 with 1 or 2 drops of 0.1 N HCl or NaOH solution before autoclaving at 121°C for 15 minutes.

2.3. Aseptic Techniques for Sterile Transfer

All operations including transfer and sterile filtration were made under laminar airflow cabinet. Prior to operation, the laminar airflow bench was swabbed with 70% alcohol to maintain maximum sterility. The laminar airflow was switched on and kept on UV mode for 30 minutes before using it. The scalpel, forceps and spatula were sterilized by flaming with alcohol before using the laminar airflow cabinet.

2.4. Explant Surface Sterilization

Leaf, stem (internodal), and root explants of R. tetraphylla were collected from the medicinal arboretum and initially washed under running tap water for 2 minutes. Then different protocols were followed for the sterilization of leaf, stem and root explants, as leaf explants are more delicate and sensitive in nature to sterilants and due to greater degree of fungal count on stem and root explants. Leaf explants were treated with Tween-20 solution for 1 minute followed by 60% ethanol for 2 minutes and in 0.1% mercuric chloride (HgCl2) solution for 2 minutes. Stem and root explants were treated initially with 0.5% bavistin for 10 minutes, followed by Tween-20 solution for 2 minutes and with 0.1% mercuric chloride solution for 4 minutes. After every treatment explants were rinsed in sterile distilled water for 2 minutes to remove the adhering chemical sterilants.

2.5. Inoculation and Incubation

Surface sterilized leaf, stem and root explants were blotted dry on sterile tissue paper and inoculated onto MS medium under aseptic conditions of laminar air flow cabinet with the help of sterile forceps and culture containers were immediately closed. During inoculation, the test tubes and flasks containing solid medium were held horizontally; this strongly reduces the contaminations. Culture tubes with inoculated explants were kept in culture room under controlled conditions of 16/8 hours of photoperiod with 3000 lux intensity light at 27°C. For each treatment, 25 replicates were used and each experiment was repeated thrice.

2.6. Callus Induction

For callus induction, fully expanded leaf, stem (inter nodal), and root explants of R. tetraphylla (two years old) were inoculated on to MS medium supplemented with 2,4-D or NAA or Kn (1.0-5.0 mg/L). Data on callus induction from three replicates were recorded at the end of 3 weeks of culture. Each replicate consists of 25 cultures.

2.7. Determination of Fresh and Dry Weight of Callus

For determination of fresh and dry weight of callus, 10 identical culture tubes were used. The mean value of each callus was determined. After determining the callus weight, they were dried in an oven at 60°C for 1 hour and average dry weight of the callus was determined. The average fresh and dry weight of the callus was subtracted from the respective callus culture to find out the average gain in fresh and dry weight of the callus. Fresh and dry weights of the callus were noted with a gap of 22 days.

2.8. Shoot Regeneration

In vitro shoot regeneration was carried from the friable callus by using individual and combinations of cytokinins (BAP and TDZ) supplemented MS media. While preparing combinational cytokinin media, BAP of 2 mg/L was kept constant across all the combinations with altering concentrations of TDZ in low amounts (0.1-1.0 mg/L). Data on number shoot bud regeneration from friable callus in three replicates was recorded at the end of 2nd week of culture. Each replicate of regeneration studies consists of 10 cultures.

2.9. Rooting of the Regenerated Shoots

The regenerated shoots were separated from the culture tubes and transferred onto MS medium containing various concentrations (0.5–2.0 mg/L) of individual (IAA or IBA) as well as combination (IAA+IBA) of auxins. Data on root induction from shoot lets of three replicates was recorded at the end of 2nd week of culture. Each replicate consists of 10 cultures.

2.10. Hardening and Acclimatization of Rooted Plantlets

Rooted plantlets of R. tetraphylla were separated carefully from the culture tubes along with the media and the adhered medium was removed gently by washing under running tap water and then hardened in a plastic pot or plastic cup by using 2:1 ratio of sterile garden soil and sand.

2.11. DNA Isolation and Genetic Fidelity Analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from acclimated plantlets of R. tetraphylla (seven plants were selected randomly, four from leaf callus based and three from stem callus based regenerants) from field along with the mother plant. Fresh leaf tissue (500 mg) of both mother plant and in vitro regenerated plants was used as raw material for DNA isolation by following modified cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (CTAB) method [28, 29]. The quality parameters of DNA were checked by spectrometric and electrophoretic methods.

For testing the genetic homogeneity of regenerated plantlets with that of mother plant, three types of primers (RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT) were used. A total of 30 primers were used, i.e., SCoT (10 primers), ISSR (10 primers), and RAPD (10 primers) for genetic fidelity studies. PCR amplifications were performed using a total volume of 50 μl containing 100 ng DNA, 1X PCR master mix (GCC biotech), and 10 p mole primer. The amplification reaction was carried out in a thermal cycler (Eppendorf, Germany) for 30 cycles with an initial denaturation at 94°C for 5 minutes, followed by denaturation at 94°C for 30 seconds, and annealing was carried at 50°C for 45 seconds for SCoT and ISSR and at 37°C for 45 seconds for RAPD primer based analysis, followed by extension at 72°C for 2 minutes and final extension at 72°C for 5 minutes. After completion of cycles, amplified products were allowed to cool down at a holding temperature of 4°C. PCR products were then separated on 1% agarose gel electrophoresis by using TAE (Tris acetic acid EDTA) buffer. The size of amplicons was estimated using 1kb DNA ladder (Thermo Scientific). All amplification reactions with RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT primers were repeated at least three times to check the reproducibility. The gels were photographed using gel documentation system and only clear and scorable DNA bands were considered for analysis.

2.12. Statistical Analysis

The data obtained in this research study was statistically analyzed by using one-way ANOVA in SPSS Version 17 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, USA) and means were compared using Tukey’s tests at the 5% level of significance. All means are presented with ± Standard Error (SE).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Callus Induction

In this study leaf, stem, and root explants of R. tetraphylla cultured on MS basal medium did not produce any callus, but when cultured on MS medium supplemented with various concentrations of plant growth regulators (2,4-D, NAA, and Kn), copious amounts of friable callus were produced, after 4 weeks of culture (Figures 1(a)1(d)). The produced callus is of different types, such as friable white, friable pale brown, and compact brown callus. At lower concentrations (1-2 mg/L) of 2,4-D, NAA, and Kn, all the explants have produced friable white callus (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)) whereas friable green callus (Figure 1(c)) to friable brown callus (Figure 1(d)) was produced from the optimum (3 mg/L) and higher concentrations (4-5 mg/L) of plant growth regulators (2,4-D, NAA, and Kn), respectively.

On 2,4-D supplemented MS media, maximum amount of mean fresh and dry weight (mg) of callus (378.7±0.67, 19.2±0.15), (241.5±0.34, 10.3±0.08), and (323.8±0.36, 15.5±0.12) was observed in leaf, stem, and root explants cultured on 5, 4, and 3 mg/L of concentrations, respectively, after 3 weeks of culture (Table 1). On NAA supplemented media, maximum amount of mean fresh and dry weight (mg) of callus (313.5±0.23, 19.5±0.27), (412.8±0.49, 25.1±0.15), and (277.4±0.14, 16.1±0.03) was observed in leaf, stem, and root explants cultured on 2, 6, and 2 mg/L concentrations, respectively, after 3 weeks of culture (Table 2). On Kn supplemented media, maximum amount of mean fresh and dry weight (mg) of callus (349.5±0.46, 22.8±0.19) and (343.2±0.64, 14.4±0.26) was observed in leaf and stem explants cultured on 5 mg/L concentration of Kn, after 3 weeks of culture (Table 3). Root explants have not responded on Kn supplemented media even after 4 weeks of culture.


Explant
MS + 2,4-D (mg/L)Morphogenetic ResponseCallus
Mean fresh weight (mg)Mean dry weight (mg)

Leaf1.0Friable white callus234.4 ± 0.12i08.2 ± 0.44k
2.0Friable white callus255.9 ± 0.23g09.6 ± 0.24j
3.0Friable white callus287.8 ± 0.91f11.4 ± 0.49h
4.0Friable white callus330.6 ± 0.76b16.7 ± 0.68b
5.0Friable white callus378.7 ± 0.67a19.2 ± 0.15a

Stem
(Inter node)
1.0Friable white callus92.6 ± 0.19l1.03 ± 0.11n
2.0Friable white callus123.5 ± 0.28k2.30 ± 0.67m
3.0Friable white callus185.6 ± 0.36j06.6 ± 0.23l
4.0Friable white callus241.5 ± 0.34h12.3 ± 0.08f
5.0Compact brown callus232.2 ± 0.24i09.4 ± 0.24j

Root1.0Friable white callus123.6 ± 0.34k07.4 ± 0.55k
2.0Friable white callus256.7 ± 0.12i11.7 ± 0.23g
3.0Friable brown callus323.8 ± 0.36c15.5 ± 0.12c
4.0dark brown callus294.3 ± 0.45d14.6 ± 0.67d
5.0dark brown callus288.3 ± 0.44e13.8 ± 0.11e

Data represents average of three replicates. Each replicate consists of 25 cultures. Data scored at the end of 3 weeks of culture. Mean ± standard error. Mean followed by the same superscript in a column is not significantly different at P=0.05.

Explant
MS + NAA (mg/L)Morphogenetic ResponseCallus
Mean fresh weight (mg)Mean dry weight (mg)

Leaf1.0Friable white callus311.7 ± 0.31c19.1 ± 0.23c
2.0Friable white callus313.5 ± 0.23d19.5± 0.67b
3.0Friable pale brown callus with roots303.6 ± 0.55e19.0 ± 0.54d
4.0Friable pale brown callus with roots291.5 ± 0.18f17.2± 0.33e
5.0Friable pale brown callus with roots242.4 ± 0.23j15.6 ± 0.80g

Stem
(Inter node)
1.0Friable white callus153.3 ± 0.14l2.2± 0.43m
2.0Friable white callus255.4 ± 0.40i4.9 ± 0.45l
3.0Friable white callus303.6 ± 0.47e10.1 ± 0.13h
4.0Pale brown callus343.1 ± 0.21b15.8 ± 0.36f
5.0Pale brown callus412.8 ± 0.49a25.1 ± 0.15a

Root1.0White friable callus256.5 ± 0.38i9.5 ± 0.19k
2.0White friable callus277.4 ± 0.14g16.1 ± 0.03f
3.0Pale brown callus262.1 ± 0.21h14.6 ± 0.43h
4.0Brown callus258.4 ± 0.74i13.9 ± 0.67i
5.0Dark brown callus243.8 ± 0.36j13.2 ± 0.31i

Data represents average of three replicates. Each replicate consists of 25 cultures. Data scored at the end of 3 weeks of culture. Mean ± standard error. Mean followed by the same superscript in a column is not significantly different at P=0.05.

ExplantMS + Kn (mg/L)Morphogenetic ResponseCallus
Mean fresh weight (mg)Mean dry weight (mg)

Leaf1.0No response----
2.0Friable white callus201.4 ± 0.111.1 ± 0.1
3.0Friable green callus226.3 ± 0.413.5 ± 0.2
4.0Pale brown callus334.6 ± 1.018.5± 0.6
5.0Pale brown callus349.5 ± 0.422.8 ± 0.1

Stem (Inter node)1.0Friable white callus218.6 ± 0.23.6 ± 0.1
2.0Friable White callus233.3 ± 0.24.2 ± 0.1
3.0Friable White callus264.9 ± 0.97.8 ± 0.2
4.0Pale brown callus309.4 ± 0.811.5 ± 0.6
5.0Pale brown callus343.2 ± 0.614.4 ± 0.2

Root1.0Single shoot bud--
2.0Two shoot buds--
3.0Multiple shoot buds--
4.0Multiple shoot buds--
5.0Multiple shoot buds--

Data represents average of three replicates. Each replicate consists of 25 cultures. Data scored at the end of 3 weeks of culture. Mean ± standard error. Mean followed by the same superscript in a column is not significantly different at P=0.05.

Though the rate of callus growth was negligible in the first two weeks, the entire explant was covered with healthy callus after 3 weeks. Major portion of callus that developed from leaf, stem, and root was friable creamy white in color after 3 weeks of culture but became brown when cultured for more than six weeks on the same medium, due to the release of phenolic compounds, which is commonly observed in the callus cultures of shrub and tree species [30]. As the primarily induced callus of leaf and stem explants were friable and creamy white in color, in order to make them friable, green, and organogenic, the primary callus of leaf and stem explants of R. tetraphylla were subcultured for 3 passages of time (2 months) on the same combination of plant growth regulators.

Anitha and Kumari (2006a) [31] were first to report callus induction from leaf explants of R. tetraphylla on MS + 2,4-D (9 μM/L) and the fresh and dry weights of callus were reported as 0.3354 and 0.0826 grams, respectively. Callus induction was also reported from petiole, cotyledonary leaf, and hypocotyl explants of R. tetraphylla cultured on MS medium supplemented with 4.52μM of 2,4-D [32]. In our study, we have induced much higher value of mean fresh and dry weight (mg) of friable callus (378.7±0.67, 19.2±0.15) at 5 mg/L concentrations of 2,4-D from leaf explants. They have induced and used the callus cultures for reserpine estimation studies [31] (Anitha and Kumari 2006a) and studied the effect of NaCl amended media on callus growth [33].

From the above reports, it was clear that callus induced from various explants of R. tetraphylla was used for different studies by previous researchers but not for in vitro regeneration studies, whereas in our study we have utilized the induced callus for clonal multiplication of R. tetraphylla through in vitro regeneration studies.

3.2. Shoot Regeneration

In our earlier studies, we have used single cytokinin (TDZ) for regeneration of shoot buds from leaf and stem based callus and obtained maximum frequency of shoot regeneration (12.0±0.28) from stem based callus at 2.27 μM/l concentration of TDZ [25]. Now through this research paper we are reporting a standardized protocol with much higher frequency of shoot regeneration from the friable callus of leaf and stem explants on MS media supplemented with individual (Figures 2 and 3) and combination of cytokinins (TDZ and BAP) (Figure 4).

In this study, three times subcultured callus of leaf and stem explants of R. tetraphylla has shown good response of shoot regeneration with maximum number of shoot buds on combinational media (TDZ+BAP) rather than individually supplemented media (TDZ or BAP). On MS media amended with individual TDZ plant growth regulators, regeneration of shoot buds with a frequency of 3.2±0.1 and 12.2±0.28 was obtained at 0.25mg/l and 0.50 mg/l concentration from leaf and stem based callus, respectively (Figure 5(a)). On BAP amended media, regeneration of shoot buds with a frequency of 10.0±0.42 and 9.0±0.34 was obtained at 4.0 mg/l concentration from leaf and stem based callus, respectively. Overall, the maximum number of shoot buds with high frequency of regeneration (25±0.25 and 20±0.76) was obtained from leaf and stem calluses, respectively, when cultured on MS media supplemented with TDZ (0.25 mg/L) + BAP (2 mg/L), after 4 weeks of culture (Table 4 and Figure 6(a)).


Three times sub-cultured callusTDZ
(mg/L)
BAP
(mg/L)
No. of shoot buds

Leaf0.102.004 ± 0.1
0.252.0025 ± 0.2
0.502.0010 ± 0.1
0.752.008 ± 0.1
1.002.002 ± 0.1

Stem0.102.004 ± 0.4
0.252.0020 ± 0.7
0.502.0014 ± 0.1
0.752.004 ± 0.2
1.002.002 ± 0.2

Data represents average of three replicates. Each replicate consists of 10 cultures. Data scored at the end of 2 weeks of culture. Mean ± standard error. Mean followed by the same superscript in a column is not significantly different at P=0.05.

Thidiazuron (TDZ) (N-phenyl-N′-1,2,3-thiadiazol-5-ylurea) is a thiadiazole-substituted phenylurea, which was reported to possess more cytokinin activity as compared to phenyl urea derivatives and other active adenine types of cytokinins [34]. Thidiazuron was also reported to possess actions of other plant growth regulators such as auxins, gibberellins, and ethylene [35]. Thidiazuron (TDZ) was used by several researchers in regeneration studies of medicinal plants with higher frequency of shoot let production from friable callus [36, 37]. In our earlier studies we have induced low frequency of multiple shoots from stem callus of R. tetraphylla on TDZ amended media [25].

It was reported that thidiazuron in combination with other plant growth regulators induced callus [38], somatic embryos [39], and shoot regeneration from friable callus [40]. Hence, in this study we have used TDZ in combination with BAP for the indirection regeneration of R. tetraphylla. In our study, combination of TDZ (0.25 mg/L) + BAP (2 mg/L) has resulted in inducing maximum number of shoot buds (25±0.25 and 20±0.76) from leaf and stem calluses, respectively, which is much higher compared to our earlier reports. TDZ+BAP combinations have been reported for successful multiple and rapid shoot regeneration of various species, e.g., Ancistrocladus heyneanus [41], Luffa cylindrical L. [42], Rauwolfia tetraphylla L. [25], Oryza sativa [43], Mirabilis jalapa L. [44], Achyranthes aspera [40], and Morus Sps. cv. PPR-1 [26].

As the regenerated shoots are minute in the form of micro shoots, they were transferred onto MS basal media (Figures 5(b) and 6(b)) and cultured for 2 weeks for elongation of micro shoots into shoot lets (Figures 5(c), 5(d), 5(e), and 6(c)).

3.3. Rooting of In Vitro Regenerated Shoots

The regenerated shoots of R. tetraphylla L. were rooted successfully with maximum rooting frequency of 98.0±1.2 on combinational media of auxins with IAA (1.0 mg/L) and IBA (1.0 mg/L), after 2 weeks of culture, and well developed plantlet with extensive rooting was observed after 4 weeks of culture (Figures 5(f), 6(d), and 6(e)). On individual auxins supplemented media, rooting was induced with a frequency of 72.4±5.6 and 90.6±6.2 from IAA (0.5 mg/L) and IBA (1.0 mg/L), respectively (Table 5 and Figure 7). Rapid growth of plant lets was observed once the primary roots were initiated from the ends of shoot lets.


IAA (mg/L) IBA (mg/L)Rooting (%)No of roots/shoot

0.5-72.4 ± 5.3.54 ± 0.6
1.0-52.1 ± 6.3.12 ± 0.2
1.5-48.3 ± 3.2.18 ± 0.2
2.0-32.7 ± 2.2.08 ± 0.1

-0.582.2 ± 5.5.16 ± 0.4
-1.0 90.6 ± 6.7.40 ± 0.7
-1.560.3 ± 3.3.22 ± 0.8
-2.044.8 ± 2.4.86 ± 0.3

0.50.584.6 ± 4.6.04 ± 0.5
0.51.092.4 ± 5.6.30 ± 0.2
1.00.569.8 ± 4.1.44 ± 0.1
1.01.098.0 ± 1.8.32 ± 0.8

Data represents average of three replicates. Each replicate consists of 10 cultures. Data scored at the end of 2 weeks of culture. Mean ± standard error. Mean followed by the same superscript in a column is not significantly different at P=0.05.
3.4. Plant Acclimatization to Ex Vitro Conditions

In vitro raised plantlets of R. tetraphylla were separated carefully from the media and hardened in a plastic pot (Figures 5(g) and 6(f)) using 2:1 ratio of sterile garden soil and sand. Initially the hardened plantlets were kept in hardened pots and cups for 4-6 weeks under controlled conditions by irrigating with broth solution of half strength MS salts and then transferred and acclimatized to field conditions (Figures 6(g) and 6(h)) with 86% survival. With garden soil and sand, similar types of results were obtained in acclimatizing the in vitro raised Morus Sps [45, 46].

3.5. Assessment of Genetic Stability Using SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD Markers

Genetic fidelity of micropropagated and acclimated plantlets of R. tetraphylla was assessed by using three generations of markers, i.e., RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT. For better analysis of genetic homogeneity and for discarding the possibility of somaclonal variants, it was always recommended to use more than one marker while carrying out the genetic stability studies [47].

Analysis with SCoT primers (10 primers) has produced a total of 30 monomorphic bands and 3 as the average number of bands per primer with band size (in bp) ranging from 400 to 2000 (Table 6). Among the 10 SCoT primers, three primers, namely, S4, S5, and S6, have produced the highest number of bands (4 bands) and three primers, namely, S1, S2, and S9, have produced the least number of bands (2 bands) which were monomorphic to the mother plant. Amplification with 10 ISSR primers has yielded 45 bands in total with 4 as the average number of bands per primer and band size (in bp) ranging from 300 to 2500 (Table 7). ISSR primer, R10, has given good amplification and produced 6 DNA bands which are clear, distinct, and scorable, in the range (in bp) of 600-2500. Similarly, with 10 RAPD primers a total of 42 bands with 4 as the average number of bands per primer and band size (in bp) ranging from 300 to 2000 (Table 8) were obtained. RAPD primer, OPA3, has given good amplification and produced 6 DNA bands which are clear, distinct, and scorable, in the range (in bp) of 300-2200.


#Primer codePrimer SequenceNumber of BandsBand Length (in bp)

1S1CAACAATGGCTACCACCA2900-1200
2S2CAACAATGGCTACCACCC21000-1500
3S3CAACAATGGCTACCACCG31000-1400
4S4CAACAATGGCTACCACCT4500-2000
5S5CAACAATGGCTACCACGA4500-2000
6S6CAACAATGGCTACCACGC4500-2000
7S7CAACAATGGCTACCACGG3500-2000
8S8ACGACATGGCGACCAACG3400-2100
9S9ACCATGGCTACCACCGAC2500-1200
10S10CCATGGCTACCACCGCAG3400-1200


#Primer codePrimer SequenceNumber of BandsBand Length (in bp)

1R1AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGG5500-2000
2R2AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGYT5750-2500
3R3AGAGAGAGAGAGAGAGTC4700-1700
4R4CTCTCTCTCTCTCTCTRA4500-2000
5R5GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAT6400-2000
6R6GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAC4500-200
7R7ACACACACACACACACT3750-1500
8R8CTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTC3600-1100
9R9GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAYT6300-2000
10R10GAGAGAGAGAGAGAGAYG6600-2500


#Primer codePrimer SequenceNumber of BandsBand Length (in bp)

1OPA1CAGGCCCTTC3300-1500
2OPA2TGCCGAGCTG5300-1000
3OPA3AGTCAGCCAC6300-2200
4OPA4AATCGGGCTG3400-1200
5OPA5AGGGGTCTTG4500-1600
6OPA6TGGGCGTCAA6400-2000
7OPA7GGCATGACCT5300-1800
8OPA8TGGGCGTCAA4400-1900
9OPA9CCAGCAGCTT3600-1100
10OPA10GACTGCACAC3600-1200

Even though we have carried amplification and produced monomorphic bands with RAPD primers, as we cannot ensure the reproducibility of results with RAPD primers, hence in our study along with RAPD primers we have also used other advanced primers, i.e., ISSR and SCoT, which are reliable and reproducible type in assessing the genetic stability of regenerants compared to RAPD [48]. All amplification reactions with RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT primers were repeated three times to check the reproducibility and results were, i.e., reproducible type with all the markers (R10-ISSR, S2-SCoT, and OPA3-RAPD).

Among the various markers, nowadays SCoT markers are gaining much attention due to their superiority and better resolvability over other markers [49, 50]. SCoT markers can be used effectively for both genetic diversity and similarity studies [51, 52]. SCoT markers were already reported for assessing the genetic stability of several plant species such as Cleome gynandra [53], Pittosporum eriocarpum [48], Albizia julibrissin [54], and Simmondsia chinensis [55]. Similarly, ISSR primer based assessment of regenerans was reported in Tylophora indica [56], Simmondsia chinensis [57], Rauwolfia tetraphylla L. [58], Spilanthes calva [59], Cucumis melo L. [60], Cornus alba [61], and Zea mays [62].

In our study, DNA bands produced by amplification with RAPD, ISSR, and SCoT markers were monomorphic across the micro propagated plantlets and the mother plant (Figures 8, 9, and 10), which confirms the true-to-type and genetically stable nature of acclimated plantlets of R. tetraphylla. RAPD and ISSR primers were also used by earlier researchers for confirming the genetic homogeneity of regenerants in R. tetraphylla [25, 63, 64]. But, this is the first report of using SCoT primers for the assessment of genetic stability of regenerants in R. tetraphylla.

4. Conclusion

An efficient and repeatable protocol was developed for conservation of economically important plant species, i.e., R. tetraphylla L., by high frequency of indirect shoot regeneration from leaf and stem based callus. Further, the genetic homogeneity of in vitro regenerated plantlets was confirmed by using SCoT, ISSR, and RAPD markers. This standardized protocol could be utilized for the mass propagation of true-to-type genotype of this endangered medicinal plant.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and can be freely available to authors with proper citation in their research work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest in this research study.

Acknowledgments

The first author gratefully acknowledges University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi, for providing financial support under Maulana Azad National Fellowship Programme. The authors thank Prof. V.S. Raju for authentication of R. tetraphylla L. and providing an accession number (No: 1866) for the specimen preserved in his research lab, Department of Botany, Kakatiya University, Warangal.

References

  1. S. Dahanukar and U. Thatte, Ayurveda Revisited, Popular Prakashan, Mumbai, 3rd edition, 2000.
  2. A. Chopra and V. V. Doiphode, “Ayurvedic medicine: core concept, therapeutic principles, and current relevance,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 75–89, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Ahmedulla and M. P. Nayar, Red data book of Indian Plants, vol. 4, Botanical survey of India, Calcutta, India, 1999.
  4. A. N. Sahu, S. Hemalatha, and K. Sairam, “Phyto-Pharmacological review of Mesua ferrea Linn,” InternationalJournal of Phytology, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6–14, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  5. P. Lingaraj, “Medicinal Plants of India: With special reference to Odisha,” International Journal of Advanced Research In Ideas in Education, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 121–135, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  6. K. Joshi, P. Chavan, D. Warude, and B. Patwardhan, “Molecular markers in herbal drug technology,” Current Science, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 159–165, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  7. K. M. Singh, K. Abhay, R. K. P. Singh, and K. Ujjwal, “Medicinal and aromatic plants for enhancing farm income: the case of bihar,” Munich Personal Repec Archive, 2013, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/50571/1/MPRA_paper_50571.pdf. View at: Google Scholar
  8. C. Wiart, Medicinal Plants of Asia and the Pacific, CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2006.
  9. K. M. Rajkarnikar, H. K. Sainju, and B. D. Bhatta, “In vitro culture of Rauwolfia serpentina L. benth. ex. Kurz,” in Proceedings of Nepal Japan Joint Symposium, pp. 232–234, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  10. R. J. VAKIL, “A clinical trial of Rauwolfia serpentina in essential hypertension,” British Heart Journal, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 350–355, 1949. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. G. K. Rohela, P. Bylla, S. Pendli, K. Rajender, B. Dharavath, and C. R. Thammidala, “ISSR marker based DNA profiling studies in Rauwolfia species,” Annals of Plant Sciences, vol. 7, no. 5, p. 2289, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. A. Chevalier, The Encyclopedia of Medicinal Plants, DK Publishing Inc, New York, NY, USA, 1st edition, 1996.
  13. P. Singh, A. Singh, A. K. Shukla, L. Singh, V. Pande, and T. K. Nailwal, “Somatic embryogenesis and in vitro regeneration of an endangered medicinal plant sarpgandha (rauvolfia serpentina l.),” Life Science Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. Faisal, N. Ahmad, and M. Anis, “Shoot multiplication in Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. using thidiazuron,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 80, no. 2, pp. 187–190, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. G. K. Rohela, B. Prasad, C. H. Ravi et al., “In vitro clonal propagation of Rauwolfia tetraphylla, a relative of indian snake root plant,” Research Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, pp. 23–31, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  16. B. Jyothi, G. Penchala Pratap, G. Sudharshan et al., “Ethnobotanical investigation of underground plant parts from Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh, India,” Life Science Leaf Lets, vol. 18, pp. 695–699, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  17. S. K. Panda, D. Debajoyti, N. Bichitra et al., “Phyto-pharmacognostical studies and quantitative determination of reserpine in different parts of Rauwolfia(Spp) of Eastern Odisha by UV Spectrocsopy Method,” Asian Journal of Plant Sciences and Research, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  18. S. K. Bhattacharjee, “Handbook of Medicinal Plants, Pointer Publications,” India, pp. 293-294, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  19. G. Brahmachari, L. C. Mandal, D. Gorai, A. Mondal, S. Sarkar, and S. Majhi, “A new labdane diterpene from Rauvolfia tetraphylla Linn. (Apocynaceae),” Journal of Chemical Research, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 678–680, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. C. Ghosh and N. Banerjee, “Influence of plant growth regulators on in vitro micropropagation of Rauwolfia tetraphylla L.,” Phytomorphology: An International Journal of Plant Morphology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 11–19, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. Faisal and M. Anis, “Rapid in vitro propagation of Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. - An endangered medicinal plant,” Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 295–299, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  22. G. C. Mitra, “Studies on the formation of viable and non-viable seeds in Rauwolfia serpentinabenth,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 54–56, 1976. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. Harisharanraj, K. Suresh, and S. Saravanababu, “Rapid Clonal Propagation Rauvolfia tetraphylla L,” Academic Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 195–198, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  24. D. Sarma, S. Sarma, and A. Baruah, “Micropropagation and in vitro flowering of Rauvolfia tetraphylla; a potent source of anti-hypertension drugs,” Planta Medica, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 277-278, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. K. Rohela, P. Bylla, S. Kota, S. Abbagani, R. Chithakari, and T. C. Reuben, “In vitro plantlet regeneration from leaf and stem calluses of Rauwolfia tetraphylla (R.canescens) and confirmation of genetic fidelity of plantlets using the ISSR PCR method,” Journal of Herbs, Spices & Medicinal Plants, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 66–75, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. K. Rohela, P. Jogam, A. A. Shabnam, P. Shukla, S. Abbagani, and M. K. Ghosh, “In vitro regeneration and assessment of genetic fidelity of acclimated plantlets by using ISSR markers in PPR-1 (Morus sp.): An economically important plant,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 241, pp. 313–321, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. T. Murashige and F. Skoog, “A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures,” Physiologia Plantarum, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 473–497, 1962. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. J. Doyle and J. L. Doyle, “Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue,” Focus, vol. 12, pp. 13–15, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  29. P. Bylla, K. R. Gulab, T. Radha et al., “DNA profiling of commercial chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) markers,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 12, no. 30, pp. 4730–4735, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. K. Rohela, P. Bylla, R. Korra et al., “Phytochemical screening and antimicrobial activity of leaf, stem, root and their callus extracts in Rauwolfia tetraphylla,” International Journal of Agriculture & Biology, vol. 18, pp. 521–528, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  31. S. Anitha and B. D. Ranjitha Kumari, “In vitro flowering in Rauvolfia tetraphylla L.,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 422–424, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. S. Anitha and D. R. Kumari, “In vitro callus culture in Rauvolfia tetraphylla L.: Indole alkaloid production,” Asian Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. Anitha and B. D. Ranjitha Kumari, “Reserplne accumulation in NaCI treated calli of Rauvolfia tetraphylla L,” ScienceAsia, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 417–419, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. C. A. Huetteman and J. E. Preece, “Thidiazuron: a potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 105–119, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. S. R. Pai and N. S. Desai, “Effect of TDZ on various plant cultures,” in Thidiazuron: From urea derivative to plant growth regulator, Ahmad. N. and M. Faisal, Eds., Springer, Singapore, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. H. Ravi, K. S. Avinash, K. R. Gulab et al., “High frequency in vitro clonal propagation of Solanum surattense burm. F,” International Journal of Pharma and Biological Sciences, vol. 3, pp. 147–151, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  37. R. Korra, P. Bylla, and G. K. Rohela, “In vitro micro propagation and confirmation of genetic fidelity using RAPD marker in ethno medicinal plant Stachytarpheta jamaicensis L. Vahl,” International Journal of Advanced Research, vol. 5, pp. 1494–1502, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  38. H. Azeez, K. Ibrahim, R. Pop, D. Pamfil, M. Hârţa, and O. Bobiș, “Changes induced by gamma ray irradiation on biomass production and secondary metabolites accumulation in Hypericum triquetrifolium Turra callus cultures,” Industrial Crops and Products, vol. 108, pp. 183–189, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. P. Baskaran and J. Van Staden, “Ultrastructure of somatic embryo development and plant propagation for Lachenalia montana,” South African Journal of Botany, vol. 109, pp. 269–274, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. S. R. Pai, V. Upadhya, H. V. Hedge, R. K. Joshi, and S. D. Kholkute, “In vitro rapid multiplication and determination of triterpenoids in callus cultures of Achyranthes aspera Linn,” Indian Journal of Biochemistry and Biophysics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 151–159, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  41. S. R. Pai, M. S. Nimbalkar, N. V. Pawar, V. V. Kedage, and G. B. Dixit, “In vitro embryo culture and Ex situ regeneration studies in Ancistrocladus heyneanus Wall. Ex Grah,” Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, vol. 9, no. 3-4, pp. 1–6, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  42. D. Sujatha, C. H. Ravi, L. Raghuvardhanet et al., “In vitro plantlet regeneration and genetic transformation of sponge gourd (Luffa cylindrica L.),” African Journal of Plant Sciences, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 244–252, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  43. A. R. Mohd Din, F. Iliyas Ahmad, A. Wagiran, A. Abd Samad, Z. Rahmat, and M. R. Sarmidi, “Improvement of efficient in vitro regeneration potential of mature callus induced from Malaysian upland rice seed (Oryza sativa cv. Panderas),” Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. S69–S77, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. G. Khan Rohela, S. Damera, P. Bylla, R. Korra, S. Pendli, and C. Thammidala, “Somatic embryogenesis and indirect regeneration in Mirabilis jalapa Linn.,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 3882–3891, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. G. K. Rohela, A. S. Aftab, and S. Pawan, “In vitro clonal propagation of PPR-1, a superior temperate mulberry variety,” Indian Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 17, pp. 619–625, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  46. G. K. Rohela, A. A. Shabnam, P. Shukla, A. N. Kamili, and M. K. Ghosh, “Rapid one step protocol for the in vitro micro propagation of morus multicaulis var. goshoerami, an elite mulberry variety of temperate region,” Journal of Experimental Biology and Agricultural Sciences, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 936–946, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. V. Lakshmanan, S. R. Venkataramareddy, and B. Neelwarne, “Molecular analysis of genetic stability in long-term micropropagated shoots of banana using RAPD and ISSR markers,” Electronic Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 8, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  48. J. Thakur, M. D. Dwivedi, P. Sourabh, P. L. Uniyal, and A. K. Pandey, “Genetic homogeneity revealed using SCoT, ISSR and RAPD markers in micropropagated Pittosporum eriocarpum Royle- an endemic and endangered medicinal plant,” PLoS ONE, vol. 11, no. 7, Article ID e0159050, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  49. B. C. Y. Collard and D. J. Mackill, “Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) polymorphism: a simple, novel dna marker technique for generating gene-targeted markers in plants,” Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 86–93, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. A. M. Gorji, P. Poczai, Z. Polgar, and J. Taller, “Efficiency of arbitrarily amplified dominant markers (SCOT, ISSR and RAPD) for diagnostic fingerprinting in tetraploid potato,” American Journal of Potato Research, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 226–237, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. S. Cabo, L. Ferreira, A. Carvalho, P. Martins-Lopes, A. Martín, and J. E. Lima-Brito, “Potential of Start Codon Targeted (SCoT) markers for DNA fingerprinting of newly synthesized tritordeums and their respective parents,” Journal of Applied Genetics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 307–312, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. C. Fang-Yong and L. Ji-Hong, “Germplasm genetic diversity of Myrica rubra in Zhejiang Province studied using inter-primer binding site and start codon-targeted polymorphism markers,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 170, pp. 169–175, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. N. S. Rathore, M. K. Rai, M. Phulwaria, N. Rathore, and N. S. Shekhawat, “Genetic stability in micropropagated Cleome gynandra revealed by SCoT analysis,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 555–559, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Rahmani, P. M. Pijut, N. Shabanian, and M. Nasri, “Genetic fidelity assessment of in vitro-regenerated plants of Albizia julibrissin using SCoT and IRAP fingerprinting,” In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 407–419, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. S. A. Bekheet, A. M. M. Gabr, A. A. Reda, and M. K. El-Bahr, “Micropropagation and assessment of genetic stability of In Vitro raised jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis Link.) plants using SCoT and ISSR markers,” Plant Tissue Culture and Biotechnology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 165–179, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  56. M. M. Sharma, R. N. Verma, A. Singh, and A. Batra, “Assessment of clonal fidelity of Tylophora indica (Burm. f.) Merrill “in vitro” plantlets by ISSR molecular markers,” Springer Plus, vol. 3, pp. 1–9, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. S. Kumar, M. Mangal, A. K. Dhawan, and N. Singh, “Assessment of genetic fidelity of micropropagated plants of Simmondsia chinensis (Link) Schneider using RAPD and ISSR markers,” Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2541–2545, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. M. Faisal, A. A. Alatar, N. Ahmad, M. Anis, and A. K. Hegazy, “An efficient and reproducible method for in vitro clonal multiplication of Rauvolfia tetraphylla L. and evaluation of genetic stability using DNA-based markers,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 168, no. 7, pp. 1739–1752, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. Razaq, M. Heikrujam, S. K. Chetri, and V. Agrawal, “In vitro clonal propagation and genetic fidelity of the regenerants of Spilanthes calva DC. using RAPD and ISSR marker,” Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 251–260, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. M. R. Raji, M. Lotfi, M. Tohidfar et al., “Somatic embryogenesis of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) and genetic stability assessment of regenerants using flow cytometry and ISSR markers,” Protoplasma, vol. 255, no. 3, pp. 873–883, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. A. Ilczuk and E. Jacygrad, “In vitro propagation and assessment of genetic stability of acclimated plantlets of Cornus alba L. using RAPD and ISSR markers,” In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 379–390, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. M. Ramakrishnan, S. A. Ceasar, V. Duraipandiyan, and S. Ignacimuthu, “Efficient plant regeneration from shoot apex explants of maize (Zea mays) and analysis of genetic fidelity of regenerated plants by ISSR markers,” Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 183–196, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Alatar and M. Faisal, “Encapsulation of Rauvolfia tetraphylla microshoots as artificial seeds and evaluation of genetic fidelity using RAPD and ISSR markers,” Journal of Medicinal Plants Research, vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 1367–1374, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. M. Faisal, A. A. Alatar, and K. H. Ahmad, “Molecular and biochemical characterization in rauvolfia tetraphylla plantlets grown from synthetic seeds following in vitro cold storage,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, Article ID 10.1007/s12010-012-9977-0, 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Gulab Khan Rohela et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1336 Views | 653 Downloads | 10 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.