Genotypes and Hot Spot Mutations of Hepatitis B Virus in Northwest Chinese Population and Its Correlation with Diseases Progression

Wang, Wei; Shu, Yi; Bao, Han; Zhao, Wenliang; Wang, Weihua; Wang, Qin; Lei, Xiaoying; Cui, Daxiang; Yan, Zhen

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3890962

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Abbreviations Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 3890962 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3890962

Genotypes and Hot Spot Mutations of Hepatitis B Virus in Northwest Chinese Population and Its Correlation with Diseases Progression

Wei Wang,^1,2,3Yi Shu,^1,2Han Bao,^1,2Wenliang Zhao,^1,2Weihua Wang,^1,2Qin Wang,^1,2Xiaoying Lei,^1,2Daxiang Cui ,⁴and Zhen Yan^1,2

Academic Editor: Mingtao Zeng

Received09 Jul 2019

Revised30 Sept 2019

Accepted19 Oct 2019

Published10 Dec 2019

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a critical incentive for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), liver cirrhosis (LC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Different genotypes and genome mutations of HBV have been found to be related to the progression of these liver diseases. However, their clinical significance is still under debate. The objective of this study was to determine the association of HBV genotypes and hot spot mutations in the reverse transcriptase (RT) and basal core promoter-precore (BCP-PreC) region with HBV-infected diseases in a northwest Chinese population. HBV genotyping and DNA sequencing were performed in samples of 980 patients. Appropriate statistical methods were adopted to assess HBV genetic features and its clinical association. It was found that the prevalent HBV genotype in northwestern Chinese patients was HBV/C (61.33%), followed by HBV/B (36.63%). In RT region, in addition to the reported nucleoside analogue- (NA-) resistance missense mutations, new silent mutations at rt169 and rt180 were found to raise the risk of HCC in patients with HBV/C. And the heterozygous mutation status of rt169/rt180 was associated with the increased risk of both HCC and NA resistance (OR > 1, ) regardless of HBV genotypes. In BCP-PreC region, multiple mutations and combinations, especially at nt 1762/1764 and nt 1896/1899, were characterized to be the causes of spurious HBeAg negativity and liver function injury, as well as the risk factors for HCC progression (). Additionally, a novel mutation at nt1799G>C was likely found to increase the risk of HCC in patients with HBV/B. These findings revealed an association between HBV genotypes and HBV genetic mutations in RT and BCP-PreC region and progression of hepatitis B. It would be helpful for risk evaluation and diagnostic improvement based on these genetic features.

1. Introduction

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) poses a great endemic threat worldwide. In China, there are roughly 100 million HBV-infected patients and virus carriers [1, 2], one-third of whom have chronic hepatitis B, and each year approximately 500,000 people die prematurely from liver function failure, liver cirrhosis (LC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and other complications secondary to HBV infection [3].

HBV is an enveloped virus. It has a partially double-stranded circular DNA genome which carries four extensively overlapping open-reading frames, namely, C, X, P, and S. Gene C that contains the sequences of precore (preC) and core proteins encodes hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg). X encodes transactivating protein X (HBx). P encodes DNA polymerase protein with reverse transcriptase (RT), and S encodes three surface antigen proteins (HBsAg). Because of drug pressure and DNA polymerase lacking proofreading capability, spontaneous mutations frequently occur, which may contribute to diverse clinical phenotypes, including the development of antiviral resistance and progression to HCC. For example, the RT region harbors multiple mutation sites associated with antiviral drug resistance [4]. Mutations within the basal core promoter (BCP; a regulatory sequence upstream of gene C) and the preC/C regions are correlated with HBeAg expression, virus loading, and progression of chronic hepatitis B to HCC [5, 6].

During the worldwide evolution of HBV virus, geographic and population differences and selective pressure from treatment have resulted in ten known HBV genotypes (A to J) containing sequence variations greater than 8% of the entire genome and reflecting distinctive geographical distributions [7–9]. Different HBV genotypes are associated with distinct clinical phenotypes and prognosis. For example, some research found that, compared to genotypes B and C, genotype A preferentially progresses to chronic hepatitis B [10], genotype D is closely associated with acute hepatitis [11], genotype B more readily develops antiviral resistance than genotype C, and genotype C takes a more aggressive disease risk of HCC than genotype B [12, 13].

HBV infection is a critical incentive for chronic hepatitis B (CHB), LC, and HCC. Different genotypes and genome mutations of HBV have been found to be related to these liver diseases and progression. However, our knowledge on HBV genotypes and genetic variations in HBV patients is quite limited and controversial because of conflicting data from different geography [14–16]. We lack the information that could enable us to recognize how HBV genotypes, naturally occurring mutations, induced mutations, and progression of HBV-infected diseases are related, how to estimate antiviral resistance based on HBV genomic sequences, or how to predict prognosis in chronic hepatitis B. To address these issues, we conducted our study on a cohort of HBV-infected northwest Chinese patients within different clinical courses by determining the genotypes and hot spot mutations in RT and BCP-PreC regions and analyzing its association with HCC development and antiviral resistance.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients, Samples, and Groups

A total of 980 patients were recruited in Xijing Hospital and Xi’an No. 323 Hospital in Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, from January 2012 to June 2016. 494 treatment-naive out-clinic patients diagnosed with HBV infection were included in the treatment-naive group, who were positive for HBsAg, with a serum HBV DNA load of ≥10³ copies/ml and without previous diagnosis of HBV infection or history of anti-HBV treatment (namely, not HBV carriers). 53 inpatients diagnosed with chronic hepatitis B were included in the nucleoside analogue- (NA-) resistant group. They had been treated with NA such as Lamivudine, Adefovir, or Entecavir for at least one year and had developed antiviral resistance. Its characteristic was that the serum HBV DNA load rebounded back to >10³ copies/ml, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and/or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) serum levels exceeded 40 U/L. 433 patients with HCC were included in HCC group, who were diagnosed by the clinician according to published guidelines [17] and underwent liver surgery at Xijing Hospital (Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China) from January 2010 to November 2015. As control, the above 547 patients consisting of treatment-naive patients and NA-resistant patients were included in non-HCC group. Peripheral blood was collected from the patients in all groups, and paraffin-embedded liver tissues were obtained from the HCC patients. This study was approved by the ethics committee of 323 Hospital (Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, China) and Xijing Hospital (Air Force Military Medical University, China), and informed consent was obtained from each patient and was conducted according to the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.

2.2. Primer Design

We obtained 53 complete genome sequences for HBV genotypes A to H from GenBank. These sequences were aligned and compared using Clustal X software (SFI, Ireland) to characterize the S, P, BCP-PreC, and C (BCP-PreC/C) regions of different HBV genotypes. Two pairs of nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) primers were then designed for each of the P and BCP-PreC/C genes of HBV genotypes A-H (Supplementary Table S2). These were compared using Clustal X software to 3222 HBV whole genome sequences from Chinese patients in the database to ensure that the primers would work on highly conserved regions of the HBV genome in the Chinese population.

2.3. HBV DNA Extraction and Amplification

HBV DNA was extracted from the serum using a TIANamp Blood DNA Mini kit and from paraffin-embedded tissues using a TIANquick FFPE DNA kit (Tiangen Biotech., Beijing, China) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. Extracted DNA was then amplified using nested PCR on a Veriti Thermal Cycler (ABI, Oyster Bay, NY, USA). The first-round of PCR was performed using the outer primers, and the program was as follows: denaturation at 95°C for 5 min; 40 cycles at 94°C for 30 s, 52°C for 50 s, and 72°C for 50 s, followed by extension at 72°C for 5 min. The second round of PCR was performed using the inner primers under the same PCR conditions. The amplified fragments were sequenced by Genewiz (Suzhou, China).

2.4. HBV Genotyping and Sequence Analysis

HBV genotypes were determined by both phylogenetic trees comparing with standard sequences in GenBank database (Supplementary Table S1) and HBV Liner software (an offline, HBV genotyping tool we developed previously, Chinese software copyright #1024141, patent #ZL 2011 10118281.7) on sequences amplified from HBV S, P, and BCP-PreC/C genes of each patient. Mutations were identified on those sequences using a Sequence Scanner (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) and HBV Drug Guide software (an offline, HBV sequence data reading tool we developed previously, Chinese software copyright #1024137, patent #ZL 2011 10152837.4).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

STATA MP 14.0 was used to perform all statistical analysis. Gpower 3.1 was used to calculate the power (1 − β) of all tests between treatment-naive group and NA-resistant group. Continuous data fitting normal distribution were shown as mean ± sd and compared using Student’s t-test or one-way ANOVA, and post hoc multiple comparisons were conducted using Tukey’s method. Other continuous data were shown as median (quartile 25, quartile 75) and compared using Mann–Whitney U test. Categorical data were compared using chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were evaluated using logistic regression. Stepwise logistic regression was used to evaluate independent factors associated with HCC development. All statistical tests were two-sided and the difference was considered significant when the value was less than 0.05 unless a particular statement.

3. Results

3.1. Patients Characteristics and HBV Epidemic Feature

The demographic and clinical characteristics of all patients recruited are shown in Table 1, including 433 HCC patients and 547 non-HCC patients which consisted of 494 treatment-naive patients and 53 NA-resistant patients. Overall, ages of included patients were 52.40 ± 12.10 years. There was no significant difference of age, gender composition, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level either between HCC patients and non-HCC patients or between treatment-naive patients and NA-resistant patients. HBV DNA was more abundant in non-HCC patients (). Infected HBV genotypes were identified by DNA sequencing and analyzed using NCBI Genotyping Tool and HBV Liner software. It was shown that HBV genotype C (HBV/C) was the most prevalent in northwest China and accounted for 61.33% of all patients recruited, followed by genotype B that accounted for 36.63%. Genotype D was rare and only accounted for 2.04%. Other genotypes such as A, E, F, G, and H were undetected. For the main genotypes, B2 and C2 subtypes were predominated as shown in Table 1. Of note, it showed a higher proportion of patients with HCC in those infected with HBV/C than in those with HBV/B (), suggesting that patients with HBV/C were at a higher risk of developing into HCC. However, HBV genotypes were found not to be correlated with NA resistance ().

3.2. Silent Mutations in HBV Polymerase Gene Increased the Risk of HCC

Polymerase gene reverse transcription conserved region (RT region) in HBV genome harbored mutations associated with HCC and NA resistance [18]. We amplified the RT region that encoded reverse transcriptase at rt155-rt330 and analyzed it using ABI Sequence Scanner and HBV Drug Guide software in the 980 patient samples. Mutations identified are listed in Supplementary Table S3. In addition to the common hot spot missense mutations of rt204, rt236, rt202, rt250, and rt181 related to NA resistance, we noticed that rt169 and/or rt180 mutations predominantly happened in HBV/B and some in HBV/C-infected patients, and these mutations were mostly the silent mutations. The silent mutation at rt169 (41.94% of total 980 samples) was from ATT to ATA in most cases and sometimes to ATC, which did not change the encoded amino acid, isoleucine (Ile). The silent mutation at rt180 (43.88% of total 980 samples) was mainly from CTG to TTG and sometimes to CTC, which did not change the encoded amino acid, leucine (Leu). These two silent mutations usually coincided with each other, accounting for 41.63% in 980 samples. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to report crude OR and adjusted OR for the confounding effects of age, gender, and antiviral therapy. It revealed that mutations at rt169 and/or rt180 raised the risk of HCC in patients with HBV/C (Table 2, all OR > 1.0, ).

Additionally, we noticed that the sequencing peaks at rt169 and rt180 in DNA sequencing map were overlapped with mutant and wild-type deoxynucleotides from PCR products, respectively (Supplementary Figure S1). We called that mutant type heterozygous. Accordingly, we collected these samples and cloned the PCR products into E. coli and randomly sampled the monoclonal for DNA sequencing. It was found that homozygous mutations predominated in non-HCC group (accounting for 84.34%), while heterozygous mutations at rt169 or/and rt180 predominated in HCC group (accounting for 81.77%). Logistic regression analysis showed that heterozygous mutations at rt169 or/and rt180 were associated with the risk of HCC pathogenesis (Table 3, OR = 24.15, ). Similarly, heterozygous mutations at these sites also predominated in NA-resistant group (accounting for 61.54%) and were shown to increase the risk of NA resistance (Table 3, OR = 13.27, ).

Besides, other mutation sites likely involved in drug resistance or HCC were observed with less frequencies. That is, mutations at rt204 (Met>Val/Ile/Thr) and rt202 likely increased the risk of NA resistance, and mutations at rt236 (Asn>Thr/His) and rt202 (Ser>Ile/Thr/Gly/Asn), rather than at rt204, seemed to increase the risk of HCC ( as shown in Supplementary Table S3).

3.3. Multiple Mutations in HBV BCP-PreC Region

Given the importance of BCP, precore, and core gene in hepatitis progression and resistance to interferon treatment [4], we examined the mutations within BCP-PreC/C region. Seven most frequent mutations found in BCP-PreC region were shown in Supplementary Table S4. All of them at nucleotide (nt) positions 1764, 1762, 1896, 1753, 1899, 1766, and 1768 were apparently abundant in patients with HBV/C and in HCC patients, while these mutations were insignificant for NA resistance.

We found that double mutations at nt 1762/1764 were most frequently observed in HCC patients compared with non-HCC patients consistently (Table 4, OR = 2.49, ). Another double mutations at nt 1896/1899 were of intermediate frequency and also remarkably abundant in HCC patients (Table 4, OR = 5.68, ). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that double mutations at nt 1762/1764 and at nt 1896/1899 were independent factors that contributed to HCC development (Table 4, all ). Interestingly, our data showed that HCC patients with mutations at nt 1762/1764 were highly susceptible to have coincident mutations at 1896 and/or 1899. The mutations coincident with the mutation at nt 1899 greatly contributed to HCC development as shown in Table 4 (), suggesting that the mutation at nt 1899 served an important role in some way. Triple mutations at nt 1762/1764/1753 and nt 1896/1899/1753 were also frequently occurred in HCC patients, but stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that they were not independent factors (Table 4).

Moreover, liver function injury with signs of alanine transaminase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST) over 40 U/L were more frequently observed in patients with HBV/C (74.13%) and less frequently in patients with HBV/B (25.87%) (OR = 3.05, , Supplementary Table S5). Mutations at nt 1762, nt 1764, and both in the BCP region, but not at any other sites, were found to be significantly correlated with liver injury (OR > 1.0, , Supplementary Table S5).

3.4. Multiple Mutations in BCP-PreC Region Were Involved in HBeAg Seroconversion

HBeAg expression is an indicator for active viral replication. Several studies have reported that mutations within BCP-PreC/C are often associated with abnormal termination of HBeAg expression, probably because amino acid coding changes resulting from these mutations would result in HBeAg transcription dysfunction and the mistakes in HBeAg translation and posttranslational processing. However, this kind of HBeAg negativity does not represent the improvement of the disease treatment outcome but is a sign of the progress [19–21]. To examine if mutations we found would lead to spurious HBeAg negativity in this northwestern Chinese population, we stratified 336 patients in the treatment-naive group, whose HBeAg data were available, into three groups: control group that harbored samples without any mutations of nt 1762/1764/1896/1899, BCP core mutant group that included samples with nt 1762/1764 double mutation only, and a coincident mutant group that included samples with nt 1762 and/or nt 1764 mutations accompanied by nt 1896 and/or nt 1899 mutations. Patients with HBeAg value less than 1.0 S/CO was considered as HBeAg-negative. It was shown that the HBeAg-positive proportion was higher in the control group (67.74%), while the HBeAg-negative proportion predominated in BCP core mutant group (53.13%, ) and coincidence group (80.09%, ) as shown in Table 5. It was indicated that patients with HBeAg-negative features and mutations at nt 1762/1764/1896/1899 in BCP-PreC region were likely to promote disease progression rather than to be in remission stage.

3.5. Mutation of 1799G>C in HBV/B Was Involved in HCC Progression

Although many studies found that patients with HBV/C had an increasing risk of HCC, the risk mutation patterns in patients with HBV/B remained uncertain. By DNA sequencing and analysis, we found that a point mutation of 1799G/C frequently existed in HBV BCP region. To identify which kind of nucleotides represented a major/wild type, we collected data in the NCBI database regarding HBV strains infecting Chinese populations and found that the nucleotide at 1799 varies among HBV genotypes. For HBV/B, the major nucleotide at 1799 site was guanine (G, 86.85%) and could be regarded as the wild type; the minor nucleotide was cytosine (C, 13.15%) and represented a mutant type. For HBV/C, C was the major nucleotide (97.41%), which was consistent with our findings that 1799C was prevalent in all patients with HBV/C. In patients infected with HBV/B, most of the non-HCC patients have wild type 1799G (65.91%), but a great proportion of HCC patients with 1799G>C mutation (89.93%) are observed as shown in Table 6, and regression analysis revealed that 1799G>C in patients with HBV/B raised the risk of HCC (OR = 17.26, , Table 6). Additionally, we examined the association between 1799G>C mutation and serum HBeAg index in 162 treatment-naive patients with HBV/B, whose HBeAg data were available. It showed that patients with the 1799G>C mutation were more frequent to become HBeAg-negative (OR = 5.47, ). These findings indicated that 1799G>C mutation might be a promising clinical indicator of HCC progression in patients with HBV/B.

4. Discussion

In this study, we characterized HBV genotypes and hot spot mutations in RT and BCP-PreC/C regions among HBV-infected patients in northwest China and analyzed their associations with distinct disease features including the development into HCC, development of resistance to antiviral treatment, liver function injury, and serum HBeAg negativity.

Mutations in polymerase gene RT region in HBV genome have been known to be associated with antiviral drug resistance, since nucleotide analogues such as lamivudine, entecavir, and telbivudine function as reverse transcriptase inhibitors by mimicking natural nucleotides and integrating within the DNA molecules to interfere with viral replication [18]. It has been reported that rt169 Ile>Thr is the primary mutation responsible for resistance to Entecavir, and rt180 Leu>Met is a compensatory mutation for resistance to entecavir, lamivudine, and telbivudine [1, 22]. In our study, we found a kind of silent mutations at rt169 and rt180, instead of those missense mutations, predominated in patients and seemed not to contribute to the risk of HCC or NA resistance. However, by further analysis in patients with each HBV genotype, it revealed that the rt169/rt180 silent mutations raised the risk of HCC in patients with HBV/C. As we know, RT and S gene share the same part of DNA sequences. By comparison, we found that the silent mutations of rt169 and rt180 in RT caused missense mutations in S gene. That is, mutation at rt169 in RT resulted in mutation of 161 Phe>Thy/Ser (F161Y/S) in HBsAg, and mutation at rt180 in RT resulted in mutation of 172 Trp>Ser (W172S) in HBsAg. HBV S gene encodes three envelop proteins: preS1, preS2, and S proteins. PreS/S variants are often identified in hepatitis B infected CHB, LC, and HCC and may contribute to the development of progressive liver damage and hepatocarcinogenesis [23, 24]. Pre-S deletion, pre-S mutation, S mutation, and splice variants may use different routes to cause liver diseases leading to accumulation of envelop protein and viral particles and induction of ER stress and consequently promote HBV immune escape and HCC development [14, 25]. There are studies that have reported that F161Y and W172S mutations in S were closely related to immune escape and promoted hepatitis B progression [26, 27]. This may explain why rt169/rt180 silent mutation in our study related to a high risk of HCC progression and NA resistance. Moreover, by monoclonal sequencing and logistic regression analyzing, we observed another important phenomenon that mutations at rt169 and rt180 as heterozygosity were significantly associated with increased risk of NA resistance and HCC progression. This existed not only in patients with HBV/C but also in those with HBV/B, reminding us that drug pressure and disease progression probably induced genetic drift and resulting in a high quasi-species complexity and diversity of HBV strains.

In consistent with previous findings that mutation at rt204 accounts for antiviral resistance to lamivudine, entecavir, or telbivudine [28], we found that rt204 mutation was particularly abundant in NA-resistant patients with HBV/C. The mutation detected for rt204 led to three possibilities, valine (GTG), isoleucine (ATT), or serine (AGT/C), which were also consistent with antiviral-resistant mutations reported for this site [18, 29]. Another site for antiviral resistance we found was rt202, which also represented resistance to entecavir in Asian population [30]. Mutation at rt236 was responsible for resistance to adefovir dipivoxil in Caucasian [31], but here it seemed to contribute to HCC instead of antiviral resistance in Chinese population. However, the result is preliminary due to the limited case samples in nucleoside analogue- (NA-) resistant group, but it still provides some clues because the statistical power of all tests listed in tables was examined and found over 0.8.

The BCP-PreC/C region is another important genetic area not only because it encodes proteins that are integral for HBV structure and functions but also because it is vulnerable to mutations that are associated with liver function injury and progression to HCC [5, 32]. Mutations at nt 1762, 1764, 1766, and 1768 located in BCP region have been reported to be associated with interferon-resistance and liver function injury [33]. Consistently, our data showed that double mutations at nt 1762/1764 were a significant risk factor of liver injury featured by elevated serum ALT and AST levels. Many studies and meta-analysis showed double mutation at nt 1762/1764 increased the risk of HCC, as well as mutation at nt 1896 in PreC region [6, 34]. PreC/C responses to encoding HBcAg and HBeAg. Mutation at nt 1896 had been reported to promote the progression to HCC in western Asian population [35]. Though some studies reported that mutation at nt 1899 was nonsignificant to HCC development, our data revealed that relative high frequent mutations of nt 1896, nt 1899, and nt 1896/1899 double mutations in PreC apparently increased the risk of HCC in northwest Chinese population, which might be attributed to the correlation between mutation at nt 1899 and liver failure [36]. Furthermore, we found a coincidence between double mutation at nt 1762/1764 and nt 1896/1899, and the quadruple mutation was shown as a risk factor of HCC (OR = 5.68). Besides, we revealed the strong association between multiple mutations at nt 1762/1764/1896/1899 and HBeAg seroconversion, which was supported by the findings that 1762/1764 double mutations repress HBeAg precursor expression [37]. The 1896G>A nonsense mutation terminates HBeAg expression by creating a stop codon [33], and the 1899G>A results in a missense mutation that inhibits the recognition and cleavage of HBeAg precursor by related enzymes [38], which eventually led to intracellular accumulation of HBeAg and its negativity in serum [39, 40]. Therefore, it could be concluded that those multiple mutations in RT and BCP-PreC region were not able to detect HBeAg and never impeded HBV replication, and therefore this led to a spurious HBeAg negativity. These findings may be helpful to guide the accurate assessment of progression of chronic hepatitis B when serum is HBeAg-negative and to prevent the misconception that HBeAg negativity represents reduced viral replication and disease progression has been controlled.

Another finding was the correlation between HBV/B infection and mutation at nt 1799G>C that was located in BCP region and overlapped with the open reading frame of HBV X gene. One study in Asian population reported that G1799C served an important role in HBeAg turning negative [41]. Our data revealed that mutation at nt 1799 was closely related to HCC (OR = 17.26) and HBeAg negativity (OR = 5.47) in patients with HBV/B. We speculate that this mutation may affect HBx gene expression, structure, and function. The underlying mechanisms, however, should be further studied.

In conclusion, by profiling the HBV genotypes and hot spot mutations among northwest Chinese patients, we identified a series of mutations in RT and BCP-PreC region and revealed that quasi-species complexity and diversity of HBV greatly contributed to HBV-related disease progression. Our findings include the confirmation of the prevalent of HBV/B and HBV/C in China, NA resistance related common mutations in RT region, and disease progression associated mutations in BCP-PreC region. We also revealed some new mutations and combinations with disease progression such as rt169/rt180 silent mutation and heterozygous mutation, nt 1896/1899 double mutation and their combination with nt 1762/1764 double mutation, and HBV/B genotype specific nt 1799 mutation. These findings together with previous reported variants proposed promise for early prediction of specific hepatitis B subtype progressing toward HCC and for selection of treatment strategy in the case of HBeAg seroconversion with high HBV DNA copies.

Abbreviations

HBV:	Hepatitis B virus
LC:	Liver cirrhosis
HCC:	Hepatocellular carcinoma
preC:	HBV precore protein
HBx:	HBV transactivating protein X
HBsAg:	HBV surface antigens
HBeAg:	HBV e antigens
BCP:	Basal core promoter
ALT:	Alanine aminotransferase
AST:	Aspartate aminotransferase
OR:	Odds ratio
CI:	Confidence interval
RT:	Reverse transcriptase
NA:	Nucleoside analogue.

Data Availability

All data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and the supplementary information files. The raw data in this study are restricted by the Independent Ethics Committee, Xijing Hospital, China, in order to protect patient privacy. Data are available from Dr. Wei Wang (e-mail: [email protected]) for researchers who meet the criteria for access to confidential data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Wei Wang and Yi Shu contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to all the patients and individuals for their participation. The authors thank Prof. Yanping Hui and Dr. Hong Cheng in the Department of Pathology, Air Force Military Medical University, for their assistance in pathological analysis. The authors thank Prof. Yong Peng in the Department of Radiology, Xijing Hospital, for his assistance in clinical data analysis. They also thank Prof. Yanghai Guo, Mr. An Xiang, Ms. Yonglan Liu, Ms. Hui Chang, and Ms. Xixi Liu in the Department of Pharmacogenomics, School of pharmacy, Air Force Military medical University, for their technical assistance. They thank Medjaden editors for their critical reading and helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was funded by grants from Important National Science & Technology Specific Projects (2009ZX10004-311), Science and Technology Co-ordination, Innovation Projects of Shanxi Province (2016KTCL03-09), Social Development and Public Relations Projects of Shaanxi Province (2011K120503 and 2008K09-09), and Science and Technology Projects of Xi’an City (SF09024 and SF09027) and State Key Laboratory of Cancer Biology Project (CBSKL2015Z14).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1: GenBank Accession IDs for the whole genome sequences of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes A to H used in this study. Table S2: primer sequences for nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of the P and BCP-PreC/C genes of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) genome. Table S3: mutations within RT region. Table S4: mutations within BCP-pre C region. Table S5: liver function injury of patients with mutations in BCP-pre C region. Figure S1: DNA sequencing map of mutations at rt169 and rt180 in P region of hepatitis B virus (HBV). (Supplementary Materials)

References

A. S. Lok and B. J. McMahon, “Chronic hepatitis B: update of recommendations,” Hepatology, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 857–861, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Trépo, H. L. Y. Chan, and A. Lok, “Hepatitis B virus infection,” The Lancet, vol. 384, no. 9959, pp. 2053–2063, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. He, D. Gu, X. Wu et al., “Major causes of death among men and women in China,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 353, no. 11, pp. 1124–1134, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ghany and T. J. Liang, “Drug targets and molecular mechanisms of drug resistance in chronic hepatitis B,” Gastroenterology, vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 1574–1585, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-X. Zheng, Z. Zeng, Y. Y. Zheng et al., “Role of hepatitis B virus base core and precore/core promoter mutations on hepatocellular carcinoma in untreated older genotype C Chinese patients,” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. e423–e431, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Liu, H. Zhang, C. Gu et al., “Associations between hepatitis B virus mutations and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis,” JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, vol. 101, no. 15, pp. 1066–1082, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. McMahon, “The influence of hepatitis B virus genotype and subgenotype on the natural history of chronic hepatitis B,” Hepatology International, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 334–342, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kramvis, “Genotypes and genetic variability of hepatitis B virus,” Intervirology, vol. 57, no. 3-4, pp. 141–150, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-L. Lin and J.-H. Kao, “Hepatitis B virus genotypes and variants,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, vol. 5, no. 5, Article ID a021436, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kobayashi, F. Suzuki, Y. Arase et al., “Infection with hepatitis B virus genotype A in Tokyo, Japan during 1976 through 2001,” Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 844–850, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Mayerat, A. Mantegani, and P. C. Frei, “Does hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype influence the clinical outcome of HBV infection?” Journal of Viral Hepatitis, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 299–304, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. L.-Y. Chan, M. L. Wong, A. Y. Hui, L. C.-T. Hung, F. K.-L. Chan, and J. J.-Y. Sung, “Hepatitis B virus genotype C takes a more aggressive disease course than hepatitis B virus genotype B in hepatitis B e antigen-positive patients,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 1277–1279, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T.-H. Hsieh, T.-C. Tseng, C.-J. Liu et al., “Hepatitis B virus genotype B has an earlier emergence of lamivudine resistance than genotype C,” Antiviral Therapy, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1157–1163, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Yang, J. W. Sun, L. G. Zhao, F. Bray, and Y. B. Xiang, “Quantitative evaluation of hepatitis B virus mutations and hepatocellular carcinoma risk: a meta-analysis of prospective studies,” Chinese Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 497–508, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Ge, T. Tian, L. Meng et al., “HBV mutations in EnhII/BCP/PC region contribute to the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 3086–3093, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Gao, R. Zuo, J. Wang, and T. Shen, “Characteristics and evolutionary history of hepatitis B virus quasi-subgenotype B3 in Southeast Asia,” Virus Research, vol. 273, Article ID 197762, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
WHO, Guidelines for the Prevention, Care and Treatment of Persons with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection, WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
B.-M. Liu, T. Li, J. Xu et al., “Characterization of potential antiviral resistance mutations in hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase sequences in treatment-naïve Chinese patients,” Antiviral Research, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 512–519, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. F. Carman, S. Hadziyannis, M. J. Mcgarvey et al., “Mutation preventing formation of hepatitis B e antigen in patients with chronic hepatitis B infection,” The Lancet, vol. 334, no. 8663, pp. 588–591, 1989.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Choi, S. H. Ahn, J. Y. Park et al., “Hepatitis B e antigen-negative mutations in the precore and core promoter regions in Korean patients,” Journal of Medical Virology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 594–601, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Bayliss, L. Yuen, G. Rosenberg et al., “Deep sequencing shows that HBV basal core promoter and precore variants reduce the likelihood of HBsAg loss following tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B,” Gut, vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 2013–2023, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Lai, N. Leung, E. K. Teo et al., “A 1-year trial of telbivudine, lamivudine, and the combination in patients with hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B,” Gastroenterology, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 528–536, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B.-F. Chen, “Hepatitis B virus pre-S/S variants in liver diseases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 14, pp. 1507–1520, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Chao, Z. Teng, Z. Yun, A. Z. Zhao, and C. Sun, “Associations between pre-S deletion mutation of hepatitis B virus and risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in the asian population: a meta-analysis,” Medical Science Monitor International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, vol. 21, pp. 1072–1077, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. S. Qu, J. X. Liu, T. T. Liu et al., “Association of hepatitis B virus pre-S deletions with the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in Qidong, China,” PLoS One, vol. 9, no. 5, Article ID e98257, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wu, H. Shi, Y. Wang, M. Lu, Y. Xu, and X. Chen, “A case of hepatitis B reactivation due to the hepatitis B virus escape mutant in a patient undergoing chemotherapy,” Virologica Sinica, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 368–371, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhao, X. Li, Y. Cheng et al., “Hepatitis B virus rtA181T/sW172non-stop mutation may increase resistance fold to adefovir- and entecavir-resistant mutants compared to rtA181T/sW172 mutation,” Antiviral Research, vol. 154, pp. 26–34, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. A. Locarnini and L. Yuen, “Molecular genesis of drug-resistant and vaccine-escape HBV mutants,” Antiviral Therapy, vol. 15, no. 3 Part B, pp. 451–461, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ninomiya, Y. Kondo, T. Niihori et al., “Sequential analysis of amino acid substitutions with hepatitis B virus in association with nucleoside/nucleotide analog treatment detected by deep sequencing,” Hepatology Research, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 678–684, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. S. Kim, H. J. Yim, M. K. Jang et al., “Management of entecavir-resistant chronic hepatitis B with adefovir-based combination therapies,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 21, no. 38, pp. 10874–10882, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Angus, R. Vaughan, S. Xiong et al., “Resistance to adefovir dipivoxil therapy associated with the selection of a novel mutation in the HBV polymerase,” Gastroenterology, vol. 125, no. 2, pp. 292–297, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. H. Chen, C. S. Changchien, C. M. Lee et al., “Combined mutations in pre-S/surface and core promoter/precore regions of hepatitis B virus increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study,” The Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 198, no. 11, pp. 1634–1642, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. X. Eloy, R. C. Moreira, M. F. Lemos, J. L. de Almeida SilvaSilva, and M. R. C. D. Coêlho, “Hepatitis B virus in the State of Alagoas, Brazil: genotypes characterization and mutations of the precore and basal core promoter regions,” The Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 704–706, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Wei, Q. Zheng, M. Li, and M. Wu, “The association between hepatitis B mutants and hepatocellular carcinoma,” Medicine, vol. 96, no. 19, Article ID e6835, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Khan, B. M. Al Balwi, Y. Tanaka et al., “Novel point mutations and mutational complexes in the enhancer II, core promoter and precore regions of hepatitis B virus genotype D1 associated with hepatocellular carcinoma in Saudi Arabia,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 133, no. 12, pp. 2864–2871, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Nian, Z. Xu, Y. Liu, J. Chen, X. Li, and D. Xu, “Association between hepatitis B virus basal core promoter/precore region mutations and the risk of hepatitis B-related acute-on-chronic liver failure in the Chinese population: an updated meta-analysis,” Hepatology International, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 606–615, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Dong, H. L. Y. Chan, Z. Liu et al., “A1762T/G1764A mutations of hepatitis B virus, associated with the increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, reduce basal core promoter activities,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 374, no. 4, pp. 773–776, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. V. Thompson, T. Nguyen, D. Iser et al., “Serum hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e antigen titers: disease phase influences correlation with viral load and intrahepatic hepatitis B virus markers,” Hepatology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1933–1944, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-H. Chen, C.-M. Lee, S.-N. Lu et al., “Clinical significance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes and precore and core promoter mutations affecting HBV e antigen expression in Taiwan,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 6000–6006, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Hadziyannis and M. D. Vassilopoulos, “Hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B,” Hepatology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 617–624, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Ni, M.-H. Chang, H.-Y. Hsu, and D.-J. Tsuei, “Longitudinal study on mutation profiles of core promoter and precore regions of the hepatitis B virus genome in children,” Pediatric Research, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 396–399, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Wei Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

2096

Downloads

1477

Citations