BioMed Research International

BioMed Research International / 2019 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 5095934 | 10 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5095934

Application Value of Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging in the Early Diagnosis of Rat Hepatic Fibrosis

Academic Editor: Jinyuan Zhou
Received02 Sep 2019
Revised24 Nov 2019
Accepted09 Dec 2019
Published28 Dec 2019

Abstract

Objective. To assess the application value of perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) in early diagnosis, quantitation, and hepatic fibrosis staging by analyzing the related parameters in hepatic fibrosis. Methods. A total of 60 rats were randomly divided into the hepatic fibrosis and control groups, and carbon tetrachloride (CCL4) was used to establish the liver fibrosis model. All rats underwent PWI examination, and the trend of the time-signal intensity curve (TIC, automatically generated by the software) was observed. Also, the perfusion parameters, maximum signal reduction ratio (SRRmax), time to peak (TTP), and mean transit time (MTT), were analyzed and compared with pathological staging. Results. The TIC curve was characterized by slow wash-in and wash-out with a low and wide peak. The PWI perfusion parameters were statistically significant in specific groups (): SRRmax values (control group and F3, F4), TTP, and MTT values (control group and F2–F4, F1 and F3, F1 and F4, and F2 and F4 in addition to TTP values for F1 and F2). Pearson’s correlation analysis showed a negative correlation of SRRmax with hepatic fibrosis stage (r = −0.439, ), while TTP and MTT values were positively correlated with hepatic fibrosis stage (TTP, r = 0.798; MTT, r = 0.647; all ). Conclusions. PWI perfusion parameters reflect the degree of hepatic fibrosis, especially TTP and MTT, and PWI is recommended for the early diagnosis of liver fibrosis for timely intervention and treatment of the disease and delaying its progression.

1. Introduction

Hepatic fibrosis is a life-threatening disease with high morbidity and mortality owing to its diverse causes. It is characterized by excessive deposition of collagen extracellular matrix (ECM) components, which support the liver [1]. Hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) are the main source of collagen and ECM [2]. After liver injury, resting HSCs are transformed into activated myofibroblasts, followed by ECM synthesis [3]. When the synthesis of ECM is greater than consumption, hepatic fibrosis develops gradually, leading to liver dysfunction, portal hypertension, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [1, 4].

Presently, the early detection of liver fibrosis is unclear, and hence, finding a method for the diagnosis of the disease is an urgent requisite. Perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) is a noninvasive method for assessing microvascular tissue distribution, viability, and function via tissue microcirculation hemodynamics, which is superior to traditional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [5, 6]. Previously, the clinical application of PWI in thoracic and abdominal organs was limited due to physiological movements [5, 7]. In recent years, with the development and application of echo-planar imaging (EPI), the influence of physiological activity on signal acquisition is greatly reduced, which lays a foundation for the widespread application of PWI in liver lesions.

Previous studies [810] on PWI perfusion parameters have shown that patients with advanced hepatic fibrosis have significantly higher MTT and TTP, increased hepatic arterial perfusion, and decreased portal perfusion as compared with patients with nonprogressive hepatic fibrosis, suggesting that PWI exerts a positive effect on the early diagnosis of liver fibrosis. Furthermore, perfusion imaging has shown increasing potential in this field and is expected to be an effective method for analyzing the liver function and determining the nature of liver lesions [1113].

The present study aimed to explore the application value of noninvasive PWI in early diagnosis, quantization, and staging of hepatic fibrosis by analyzing the PWI perfusion parameters (SRRmax, TTP, and MTT).

2. Materials and Methods

All experimental animal protocols were in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou, China). Efforts were made to minimize the suffering of the animals and reduce the number of animals used.

2.1. Liver Fibrosis Model

A total of 60 male, 6-week-old, Sprague Dawley rats, weighing 180–200 g, were purchased from the Experimental Animal Center of Soochow University and randomly divided into the hepatic fibrosis group (n = 48) and the control group (n = 12). In the hepatic fibrosis group, 40% CCL4 oil solution was injected subcutaneously (initial dose was 5 mL/kg, followed by 3 mL/kg, twice a week, intraperitoneally). 10% ethanol solution was the only drinking liquid, which established a composite liver fibrosis model combining chemical and alcohol factors to shorten the modeling time and improve the success rate. The control group was intraperitoneally injected with normal saline, and the dosage and usage were identical to that of the hepatic fibrosis group, and purified water was the drinking liquid. The prolonged modeling time led to the loss of appetite, mental collapse, decreased activity, weight loss, malnutrition, and hairlessness in the hepatic fibrosis group, while the rats in the control group showed bright hair and an increase in the body weight.

2.2. MR Perfusion Imaging

From the 2nd week after modeling, in order to maintain a relatively balanced number of rats between the groups, 4 model and 1 control rats were randomly selected every week for scanning; the remaining model rats were continuously injected with CCL4, and the abovementioned steps were repeated until the end of the experiment at week 10. MRI scan was performed using a multichannel whole-body MR scanner (Philips Achieva System, the Netherlands), with a field strength of 1.5 T and a bore size of 60 cm. About 10–30 min before the scan, the rats were anesthetized by 2% pentobarbital sodium (40 mg/kg, intraperitoneally). Then, the animals were fixed on the gantry (in the prone position) with the liver placed in the center of the 4.7 cm microcoil of the microscope (Philips). Abdominal compression bandages were applied to restrain the respiratory movement range, and the height of the gantry was adjusted before scanning to ensure that the rat liver was at the center of the magnet. First, the three planes of the positioning image were scanned, followed by the conventional turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequence of the axial T2WI-SPAIR and T1WI scan, and finally the PWI scan was started. After scanning five dynamics, the magnetic contrast agent (Gd-BOPTA, commodity name MultiHance, containing 529 mg of gadobenate dimeglumine/mL (gadolinium acid 334 mg + meglumine 195 mg)) was rapidly injected into the rat tail vein, at a dose of 0.2 mmol/kg (the average injection volume was about 0.5 mL per rat) at a flow rate of 2 mL/s, and 40 consecutive dynamic scans were performed at a scanning time of 97 s, and 8 to 12 layers covered the whole liver. PWI uses a single-shot spin-echo echo-planar imaging (SE-EPI) and fat suppression techniques to exclude the artifacts due to the chemical shifts.

2.3. Histological Examination

Within 4 h after PWI scanning, the rats were decapitated according to the ethical requirements of the animal experiment. Based on the liver function analysis of the MR region of interests (ROIs), the right liver lobe was fixed with 4% formaldehyde, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H&E), Masson trichrome, and reticular fiber. All slices of the fixed liver (a minimum of two (1 mm × 1 mm × 1 mm) from each rat) were examined by using a light microscope (Olympus CH30, Tokyo, Japan). Based on the histological manifestations, the METAVIR-scoring system was used to evaluate the liver fibrosis stage on a scale of 0–4: F0: no fibrosis; F1: collect abbacy fibrosis, no fibrous septa; F2: a small amount of fibrous septa is formed; F3: excessive fibers formed between deformed lobular structures; F4: liver cirrhosis [14]. Ultrastructural changes of the liver tissue were observed by transmission electron microscopy (Hitachi H-600, Tokyo, Japan), including hepatocyte morphology, nucleus, organelle changes, sinusoidal morphology, endothelial cell changes, Disse space, and fibrous tissue proliferation in the hepatic lobule. All histological examinations were undertaken by an experienced pathologist blinded to the study protocol.

2.4. Image Analysis

Perfusion software (Philips, the Netherlands) was used to process the original image. The time-signal intensity curve (TIC) was automatically generated by the software to analyze the signal intensity changes of ROIs at different time points. Notably, ROI included the entire liver but avoided its large blood vessels and was manually plotted in the original image. The perfusion parameters were calculated as follows: (1) maximum signal reduction ratio (SRRmax): SRRmax = (SIpre − SIp)/SIpre × 100%, where SIpre is the average value of the signal intensity of ROIs after perfusion scan image is stabilized and before the signal declines, and SIp is the value at which ROI signal intensity drops to its peak. (2) Time to peak (TTP) : the time from the point when the ROI signal intensity begins to decrease (t0) to the time when the drop reaches the peak (tp). (3) Mean transit time (MTT): the time for the contrast agent to pass through the ROI capillary network, , , where S0 is the image signal intensity on the precontrast images, St is the image signal intensity measured at time t, time-relaxation rate () curve is proportional to the relative blood flow [15]. Finally, Pearson’s correlation between perfusion parameters and pathological stages of hepatic fibrosis was analyzed.

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All data showed normal distribution and were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Single-factor analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA) was used to compare the differences between groups, followed by mean multiple comparison analysis of each group. For all pairwise group comparisons, t-test and Duncan’ test were used for equal variance, and a two-tailed Student’s t-test was used for unequal variances. All pairwise correlations between variables were examined by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient. indicated a statistically significant difference. The analyses were performed using SPSS, version 16.0 (Chicago, IL, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Establishment of Rat Liver Fibrosis Model

A total of 17 rats that did not meet the experimental requirements (death or imaging failure) were excluded. The causes of death in rats included the toxic effects of CCL4 during modeling: excessive anesthesia or anesthetic is accidentally injected into the blood vessel; the abdominal compression bandage is extremely tight, affecting the respiratory movement of rats; and rats with advanced liver fibrosis had abnormal liver function and decreased tolerance to anesthetic agents. The main reasons of perfusion imaging failure included failure of tail vein puncture, external leakage during contrast injection, unsatisfactory anesthesia affect imaging, and poor image quality impact analysis.

Liver fibrosis was not observed in the control group rats (F0, n = 8), while all tetrachloride-injected rats developed liver fibrosis (model, n = 35). F1 fibrosis was observed in seven rats, F2 in nine, F3 in eleven, and F4 in eight rats. Early fibrosis was characterized by fibrosis in the portal area and a small number of fiber cords; as the degree of fibrosis deepens, the number of fiber strands increases, the distribution becomes disordered, and pseudolobules are formed (Figures 13).

3.2. Liver Fibrosis PWI Performance

The liver perfusion baseline of 43 rats was smooth, and the morphology of liver parenchyma perfusion curve was stable, showing different trends due to the degree of fibrosis (Figure 4). The dynamic variation characteristics of perfusion imaging signals were as follows: after the contrast agent was injected, the intensity of the liver signal decreased and then recovered slowly; also, the TIC curve of the liver parenchyma showed a corresponding change in the trend. Interestingly, the TIC curve was characterized by slow wash-in and slow wash-out with a low and wide peak. In the control group, the curve showed a rapid decline, followed by slow recovery after reaching the peak, with a large recovery range and a short recovery time (Figure 4(b)). Conversely, the curve of the hepatic fibrosis group descended slowly and the amplitude decreased, which prolonged the time to reach the peak. After reaching the peak, the recovery range was small, the recovery time was long, the wave peak was wide, and the enhancement of the liver parenchymal increased slowly (Figures 4(c)4(f)). Notably, this change was pronounced with increasing stage of liver fibrosis (Figures 4(b)4(f)).

3.3. Analysis of Liver Perfusion Parameters

As the degree of liver fibrosis increased, the SRRmax value decreased, while TTP and MTT values increased gradually (Table 1); these parameters were statistically significant. Pearson’s correlation analysis showed that SRRmax was negatively correlated with liver fibrosis stage, while TTP and MTT values were positively correlated with liver fibrosis stage (Table 2). The scatter plots of liver fibrosis stage and mean perfusion parameters (Figures 5(a)5(c)) and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of PWI perfusion parameters for F0 and F1 (Figure 5(d)) allowed us to conclude that compared with a single parameter, and the combination of the three parameters significantly improves the detection efficiency of F1.


Liver fibrosis stage (n)SRRmaxTTPMTT

Control (n = 8) a0.754 ± 0.07314.175 ± 4.84524.620 ± 5.577
F1 (n = 7) b0.674 ± 0.13718.433 ± 7.29328.945 ± 2.758
F2 (n = 9) c0.632 ± 0.15426.789 ± 3.621 ac, bc32.502 ± 4.268 ac
F3 (n = 11) d0.603 ± 0.201 ad31.755 ± 7.308 ad, bd35.861 ± 4.651 ad, bd
F4 (n = 8) e0.535 ± 0.135 ae35.213 ± 6.322 ae, be, ce35.203 ± 5.674 ae, be

Note: SRRmax: (S) × 100%; TTP: (S)s; MTT: (S)s; lowercase letters a–e: corresponding to the control group, F1–F4 group, meaningful groups are marked in the figure.

SRRmaxTTPMTT
r value valuer value valuer value value

Liver fibrosis stage−0.4390.0030.7980.647

TTP and MTT were correlated with liver fibrosis stage, while SRRmax was low, all .
3.3.1. SRRmax Statistical Analysis

Statistically significant differences were detected between the control group and F3 and F4 (), while no significant difference was observed between the other groups ().

3.3.2. TTP Statistical Analysis

Statistically significant differences were observed between the control group and F2–F4, F1 and F2, F1 and F3, F1 and F4, and F2 and F4 (). Also, no significant difference was detected between the control group and F1, F2 and F3, and F3 and F4 ().

3.3.3. MTT Statistical Analysis

Statistically significant differences were observed between the control group and F2–F4, F1 and F3, and F1 and F4 (), while no significant difference was detected between the control group and F1, F1 and F2, F2 and F3, F2 and F4, and F3 and F4 ().

4. Discussion

The current study demonstrated that SRRmax, MTT, and TTP were altered in rats with varying degrees of hepatic fibrosis, and as the degree of hepatic fibrosis increased, the SRRmax value decreased, while that of TTP and MTT increased. PWI has different discriminating ability in the different stages of hepatic fibrosis. These three perfusion parameters, especially TTP and MTT, can detect early fibrosis, which is helpful for clinical early diagnosis and intervention, thus delaying the progression of fibrosis.

Hepatic sinus is equivalent to the capillaries of the liver. A variety of pathogenic factors lead to changes in the morphology and function of the sinusoidal endothelial cells; for example, the fenestrae gradually shrink or even disappear, the subcutaneous basement membrane is formed, and continuous capillaries, known as sinusoid capillarization is observed [16, 17]. The sinusoidal endothelium cells play a pivotal role in hepatic fibrosis and are the main factors affecting liver microcirculation hemodynamics. Hepatic sinusoid capillarization prevents oxygen diffusion into the Disse space, leading to ischemia, hypoxia, and activation of stellate cells [18, 19]. Activated HSCs synthesize ECM and produce abundant fibrous connective tissue, leading to compression and stenosis of liver sinus and portal vein branches, increased blood flow resistance of hepatic sinus and portal pressure, and decreased portal venous perfusion, which is the so-called hemodynamic change [20, 21].

In the hepatic fibrosis group (n = 35), light microscopy showed fibrous connective tissue hyperplasia around the hepatic sinus, central vein, and portal vein; transmission electron microscopy showed a decrease in the number of sinusoidal endothelial cells, subcutaneous basement membrane formation, hepatic sinus capillary vascularization, deformation, and stenosis. With the increase in hepatic fibrosis stage, PWI showed a decrease in liver parenchymal enhancement rate, and the TIC curve morphology and perfusion parameters changed; this phenomenon was based on the pathological changes.

Perfusion is the microscopic movement of the capillary bed, which refers to the process of blood perfusion from the artery to the capillary network, and then into the vein, which reflects the duration of the local tissue blood flow [22]. Currently, EPI is the rapid developing MRI technology with high temporal resolution [23, 24]. It can evaluate the organization and hemodynamic perfusion before the contrast agent travels from the intravascular to extracellular space. Moreover, it is viewed as a noninvasive test method to observe the hemodynamic changes of tissue microcirculation and assess the vitality and function of the organization. MR perfusion imaging is more sensitive than CT perfusion imaging without any ionizing radiation-induced damage. In addition, MRI can perfuse the whole liver, providing a more comprehensive and accurate information of the blood supply than partial perfusion of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) [25].

Presently, liver MR perfusion imaging and perfusion models are yet in the exploratory stage with constant improvement [21, 26]. Based on the different principles of magnetic resonance perfusion imaging, three methods have been devised [27]: contrast agent first-pass, arterial spin-labeling, and blood oxygen level-dependent contrast enhancement technology. Hitherto, contrast agent first-pass is the most widely used imaging method [28]. The basic principle is as follows: when the diffuse contrast medium is rapidly injected into the bloodstream in a short period and passes through the capillary network in an area of tissue, it increases the inhomogeneity of the local magnetic field and creates a difference in the magnetic susceptibility between the local and surrounding tissues. Consequently, the T1 and T2 (relaxation rate effect) or the T2 value (magnetic susceptibility effect) of the local blood flow is decreased, especially the T2 relaxation time, thereby altering the intensity of the local tissue signal. The gamma function fitting can be used to eliminate the influence of contrast agent circulation and leakage effects on the quantitative perfusion analysis [15]; thus, the changes in the signal of the contrast agent in the first pass reflect the status of tissue perfusion and indirectly reflect the microvascular distribution of the organization. The quantitative and semiquantitative evaluation of the local tissue perfusion parameters is based on the changes in microcirculation and hemodynamics of the liver lesions [8, 26, 29].

GD-BOPTA provides information on the vascular changes and hepatocyte function, increasing the detection sensitivity of early HCC to 91–93% [30]. The relaxation rate of GD-BOPTA is significantly higher than that of the other types of gadolinium paramagnetic contrast agents; it is twice that of GD-DTPA, and even half dose can achieve the same strengthening effect [31]. The present study used the GD-BOPTA efficiency and T2 negative enhancements on T2WI liver perfusion. The advantages were as follows: (1) high relaxation rate, sensitive to changes in blood flow; (2) high temporal resolution; and (3) perform a high level, continuous multiphase scanning, and complete the entire liver perfusion imaging. As liver imaging is susceptible to artifacts (magnetic-sensitive and chemical shift), it is necessary to ensure the stability of the gradient field, optimize the imaging parameters, and use fat suppression techniques to obtain a satisfactory liver perfusion image.

Based on the results of this study, PWI can detect early liver fibrosis, provide early diagnosis for clinical practice, and apply effective treatment before the disease progresses to liver cirrhosis or cancer in order to prolong the survival of patients. The MR perfusion imaging is the preferred method while investigating cirrhosis. Some studies [9, 32] demonstrated that patients with cirrhosis had lower blood volume and blood flow than normal individuals; however, the mean transit time was prolonged. Frank et al. [33, 34] studied the portal vein blood perfusion of liver cirrhosis in animal models and found that the TTP value of liver cirrhosis perfusion curve was positively correlated with the liver cirrhosis pathological grading, and PWI was expected to find liver fibrosis at an early stage. Another study [35] suggested that hepatic interlobular perfusion was heterogeneous, in which the left lateral liver lobe (LLL), the left medial liver lobe (LML), the right liver lobe (RL), the caudate lobe (CL), and TTP were positively correlated with the hepatic fibrosis stage, while positive enhancement integral (PEI) and maximum slope of increase (MSI) were negatively correlated. The abovementioned studies indicated that MR perfusion imaging could be used to detect and stage the early liver fibrosis based on the degree of change in the perfusion parameters.

The study of MR blood perfusion in liver fibrosis is still in the exploratory stage. Hagiwara et al. demonstrated that patients with advanced liver fibrosis had increased hepatic arterial blood flow, arteriolar fraction, the volume of distribution, and MTT, but the portal vein scores declined [8, 36, 37]. Chen et al. [38] reported that the slope of time-signal intensity curves and the area under the curve declines gradually with the increase in liver fibrosis stage; these perfusion parameters could evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis adequately. In addition to changes in MTT and TTP, some studies reported abnormalities in intrahepatic perfusion in patients with progressive hepatic fibrosis; consequently, portal vein fraction decreased, the hepatic artery enhancement fraction increased, the hepatic artery perfusion value (HAP) increased, and the hepatic portal vein perfusion (HPP) decreased [810, 39]. Taken together, these results provided possible directions for future research.

Among numerous liver perfusion parameters, SRRmax, TTP, and MTT are relatively common, sensitive, and accurate indicators of liver microcirculation perfusion resistance; MTT is one of the most sensitive and specific perfusion indicators for the diagnosis of advanced liver fibrosis [36, 37]. TTP reflects the ability of low-molecular weight compounds in plasma to freely enter the Disse cavity, while some investigators demonstrated that TTP in liver fibrosis patients is extended than that in a normal person, which is attributed to sinusoid capillarization and collagen deposition in Disse cavity; also, the extravascular space limits the movement of low-molecular weight compounds [34].

In the current study, PWI perfusion parameters were statistically significant in the following groups (): SRRmax values, control group and F3 and F4; TTP values, control group and F2–F4, F1 and F2, F1 and F3, F1 and F4, and F2 and F4; MTT values, control group and F2–F4, F1 and F3, and F1 and F4. This phenomenon indicates that PWI perfusion parameters have a sensitive detection ability for F2–F4 liver fibrosis, especially TTP and MTT values, but the F1 detection ability needs further improvement. The altered trend of the single parameter has a suggestive effect on the detection of F1, while the detection efficiency is significantly improved when the three parameters are combined. The findings of this study also suggested that as the degree of liver fibrosis increased, the SRRmax value decreased, but the TTP and MTT values increased gradually. Intriguingly, with the development of liver fibrosis stage, this change was apparent. The pathological examination showed that different degrees of intrahepatic fiber formation, lobular collapse, distorted and reduced intrahepatic vessels, and increased blood flow resistance decreased the blood flow to the liver parenchyma and slowed the rate of liver perfusion. After injecting the contrast agent, the perfusion curve could visually reflect the trend of slow-in and slow-out of the hepatic fibrosis group, which was related to the sinusoidal capillary vascularization affecting the material exchange between blood and liver cells, thereby resulting in a decrease in blood volume in the liver parenchyma.

Although SRRmax, TTP, and MTT exert a satisfactory predictive effect on early liver fibrosis, sensitivity in the detection of F1 needs further research and improvement. Nevertheless, the present study has some limitations: the sample size is relatively small, the number of rats in F0–F4 is uneven, and the failure rate is slightly high. In future research, we can try to improve the credibility of the experimental results by expanding the sample size. Besides, precise control of drug dosage and proficiency in operational techniques may help to improve the success rate of the experiment. PWI is still in the developmental stage, the technology and model need to be refined further to shorten the imaging time and improve the spatial and temporal resolution, image quality, sensitivity, and accuracy of perfusion parameter analysis [1].

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the current study showed that PWI perfusion parameters (TTP, MTT, and SRRmax) were closely related to liver fibrosis stage (TTP and MTT, positive correlation; SRRmax, negative correlation), especially TTP and MTT values, and the combination of these three parameters significantly improved the detection efficiency of F1. Supposedly, PWI perfusion parameters are predictive indicators of early liver fibrosis, providing an early basis for the clinical intervention and treatment of the condition. These parameters have advantages over conventional imaging techniques and broad application prospects. Hepatic fibrosis can also be studied based on the correlation between the reduction in the number of fenestrations and liver fibrosis stage, which would provide an insight into the pathogenesis of liver fibrosis.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

All experimental protocols were approved by the Animal Experimental Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou, China). These animals were raised and supplied by the animal laboratory of our institute, and the treatment of experimental animals was in accordance with the ethical requirements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Guohua Fan (G. F.) and Yang Ya (Y. Y.) contributed equally to this work and are co-first authors. G. F. designed the overall study and participated in the guidance, supervision, and correction of the entire study. Y. Y. compiled the data, retrieved the literature, and wrote this article. X. N., J. H., and R. Y. provided valuable suggestions on data collection, collation, and article writing.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Suzhou Science & Technology Projects for People’s Livelihood (SS201854).

References

  1. Z. Li, J. Sun, and X. Yang, “Recent advances in molecular magnetic resonance imaging of liver fibrosis,” Biomed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 595467, 12 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. P. N. Mimche, C. M. Lee, S. M. Mimche et al., “EphB2 receptor tyrosine kinase promotes hepatic fibrogenesis in mice via activation of hepatic stellate cells,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 2532–2545, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Alsamman, V. Sterzer, S. K. Meurer et al., “Endoglin in human liver disease and murine models of liver fibrosis-a protective factor against liver fibrosis,” Liver International, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 858–867, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. H. Jiang, T. Zheng, T. Duan, J. Chen, and B. Song, “Non-invasive in vivo imaging grading of liver fibrosis,” Journal of Clinical & Translational Hepatology, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 198–207, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. A. J. Madhuranthakam, Q. Yuan, and I. Pedrosa, “Quantitative methods in abdominal MRI: perfusion imaging,” Topics in Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 251–258, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. S. C. Faria, K. Ganesan, I. Mwangi et al., “MR imaging of liver fibrosis: current state of the art,” Radiographics, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1615–1635, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. H. Thng, S. K. Tong, D. J. Collins, and D. M. Koh, “Perfusion magnetic resonance imaging of the liver,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 16, no. 13, pp. 1598–1609, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. P. Jignesh, E. E. Sigmund, H. Rusinek, M. Oei, J. S. Babb, and B. Taouli, “Diagnosis of cirrhosis with intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion MRI and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI alone and in combination: preliminary experience,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 589–600, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. Hersh, T. K. Block, J. Ream et al., “Estimating liver perfusion from free-breathing continuously acquired dynamic gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced acquisition with compressed sensing reconstruction,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 88–94, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. B. Leporq, J. Dumortier, F. Pilleul, and O. Beuf, “3D-liver perfusion MRI with the MS-325 blood pool agent: a noninvasive protocol to asses liver fibrosis,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1380–1387, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. Y. Cao, H. Wang, T. D. Johnson et al., “Prediction of liver function by using magnetic resonance-based portal venous perfusion imaging,” International Journal of Radiation OncologyBiologyPhysics, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 258–263, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. L. Matthieu, S. Doblas, C. Giraudeau et al., “Advanced fibrosis: correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters at dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MR imaging and hepatocyte organic anion transporter expression in rat liver,” Radiology, vol. 274, no. 2, pp. 379–386, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. K. Saito, J. Ledsam, S. Sourbron et al., “Assessing liver function using dynamic Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI with a standard 5-phase imaging protocol,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 1109–1114, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Z. Li, J. Sun, L. Chen et al., “Assessment of liver fibrosis using pharmacokinetic parameters of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 98–104, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. F. Mihara, Y. Kuwabara, A. Tanaka et al., “Reliability of mean transit time obtained using perfusion-weighted MR imaging; comparison with positron emission tomography,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 33–39, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. L. D. Deleve, “Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in hepatic fibrosis,” Hepatology, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1740–1746, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. J.-L. Duan, B. Ruan, X.-C. Yan et al., “Endothelial Notch activation reshapes the angiocrine of sinusoidal endothelia to aggravate liver fibrosis and blunt regeneration in mice,” Hepatology, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 677–690, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. Y. Huang, X. Deng, and J. Liang, “Modulation of hepatic stellate cells and reversibility of hepatic fibrosis,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 352, no. 2, pp. 420–426, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. Y. Koyama and D. A. Brenner, “Liver inflammation and fibrosis,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 55–64, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. K. Hyeonjin, C. J. Booth, A. B. Pinus et al., “Induced hepatic fibrosis in rats: hepatic steatosis, macromolecule content, perfusion parameters, and their correlations--preliminary MR imaging in rats,” Radiology, vol. 247, no. 3, pp. 696–705, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. C.-Y. Zhang, W.-G. Yuan, P. He, J.-H. Lei, and C.-X. Wang, “Liver fibrosis and hepatic stellate cells: etiology, pathological hallmarks and therapeutic targets,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 22, no. 48, pp. 10512–10522, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. A. Cuenod and D. Balvay, “Perfusion and vascular permeability: basic concepts and measurement in DCE-CT and DCE-MRI,” Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 1187–1204, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. B. Dymerska, B. A. Poser, W. Bogner et al., “Correcting dynamic distortions in 7T echo planar imaging using a jittered echo time sequence,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 1388–1399, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Z. Nagy and N. Weiskopf, “Efficient fat suppression by slice-selection gradient reversal in twice-refocused diffusion encoding,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 1256–1260, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. B. E. Van Beers, J.-L. Daire, and P. Garteiser, “New imaging techniques for liver diseases,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 690–700, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. K. Fahmi, A. Soliman, A. El-Baz et al., “Models and methods for analyzing DCE-MRI: a review,” Medical Physics, vol. 41, no. 12, p. 124301, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Wang, Y. Zhang, R. L. Wolf, A. C. Roc, D. C. Alsop, and J. A. Detre, “Amplitude-modulated continuous arterial spin-labeling 3.0-T perfusion MR imaging with a single coil: feasibility study,” Radiology, vol. 235, no. 1, pp. 218–228, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. R. Ramasawmy, A. E. Campbell-Washburn, J. A. Wells et al., “Hepatic arterial spin labelling MRI: an initial evaluation in mice,” NMR in Biomedicine, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 272–280, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. C. Li, R. Li, and W. Zhang, “Progress in non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis,” Cancer Biology & Medicine, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 124–136, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Ippolito, R. Inchingolo, L. Grazioli et al., “Recent advances in non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 23, pp. 2413–2426, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Veldhoen, M. Oechsner, A. Fischer et al., “Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative lung perfusion imaging using the dual-bolus approach: comparison of 3 contrast agents and recommendation of feasible doses,” Investigative Radiology, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 186–193, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. B. Leporq, J.-L. Daire, C. M. Pastor et al., “Quantification of hepatic perfusion and hepatocyte function with dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI in patients with chronic liver disease,” Clinical Science, vol. 132, no. 7, pp. 813–824, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. P. Frank, A. Laurence, H. Laurent, and B. E. Van Beers, “Inflow correction of hepatic perfusion measurements using T1-weighted, fast gradient-echo, contrast-enhanced MRI,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Official Journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 710–717, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. L. Zhou, T.-W. Chen, X.-M. Zhang et al., “Liver dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for staging liver fibrosis in a piglet model,” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 872–878, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Zhou, L.-Y. Wang, X.-M. Zhang et al., “Semi-quantitative assessment of the presence and child-pugh class of hepatitis B related cirrhosis by using liver lobe-based dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI,” Clinical Radiology, vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 1289–1295, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Hagiwara, H. Rusinek, V. S. Lee et al., “Advanced liver fibrosis: diagnosis with 3D whole-liver perfusion MR imaging-initial experience,” Radiology, vol. 246, no. 3, pp. 926–934, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. R. K. G. Do, H. Rusinek, and B. Taouli, “Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the liver: current status and future directions,” Magnetic Resonance Imaging Clinics of North America, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 339–349, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. B.-B. Chen, C.-Y. Hsu, C.-W. Yu et al., “Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis patients,” European Radiology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 171–180, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Y. Ou, S. Bonekamp, D. Bonekamp et al., “MRI arterial enhancement fraction in hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis,” AJR American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 201, no. 4, pp. 596–602, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Guohua Fan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

276 Views | 147 Downloads | 0 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder