Review Article
Application of Compressive Sensing to Ultrasound Images: A Review
Table 1
CS-based reconstruction algorithms.
| S/N | References | Method | NMSE after 30 iterations | SSIM |
| 1 | [32] | Approximate messaging passing DCT, wavelet, and spatial as transform domain Soft thresholding and ABE as denoiser | Time soft thresholding | −5 (dB) | | Time ABE | −5 (dB) | Wavelet soft thresholding | −10 (dB) | Wavelet ABE | −10.12 (dB) | Discrete cosine transform ST | −13.97 (dB) | Discrete cosine transform ABE | −21.23 (dB) |
| 2 | [33] | Approximate messaging passing Cauchy prior-based maximum a posteriori | Algorithm | Time (sec) | | | ST | 4.57 | −14.25 (dB) | ABE | 4.77 | −15.15 (dB) | Cauchy-MAP | 5.33 | −16.27 (dB) |
| 3 | [34] | IRLS-DP FD-SαS-IRLS SαS-IRLS LP minimization (DP) dual prior information | NRMSE | Sαs-IRLS | FD-SαSIRLS | IRLS-DP | Compression ratio | Sαs-IRLS | FD-SαSIRLS | IRLS-DP | 33% | 0.697 | 0.540 | 0.249 | 0.208 | 0.586 | 0.908 | 50% | 0.518 | 0.291 | 0158 | 0.377 | 0.844 | 0.944 |
| 4 | [35] | CS-STA Sym8 wavelet as sparsifier | NRMSE | | | | | CS-STA | 32 | 64 | 128 | Results 1 | 0.98% | 0.42% | 0.01% | Results 2 | 0.41% | 0.12% | 0.001% |
| 5 | [36] | Bayesian framework-based algorithm Fourier transform as sparse domain | NRMSE | | | | | | Simulated image | In vivo image | Classical CS | E = 0.12 | E = 0.10 | Bayesian CS | E = 0.12 | E = 0.07 |
|
|