Ultrasonographic Assessment with Three-Dimensional Mode of the Urethral Compression Effect following Sling Surgery with and without Mesh Surgery

Lin, Kun-Ling; Juan, Yung-Shun; Chou, Shih-hsiang; Long, Cheng-Yu

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8285351

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 8285351 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8285351

Ultrasonographic Assessment with Three-Dimensional Mode of the Urethral Compression Effect following Sling Surgery with and without Mesh Surgery

Kun-Ling Lin,^1,2Yung-Shun Juan,³Shih-hsiang Chou,⁴and Cheng-Yu Long^4,5

Academic Editor: Andrea Tinelli

Received21 Jan 2018

Accepted14 May 2018

Published06 Jan 2019

Abstract

Background. The aim of this study was to assess anatomical changes in the urethra at rest and during straining following sling surgery with and without transvaginal mesh surgery (TVM) in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) with or without pelvic organ prolapse (POP) using three-dimensional ultrasonography. Methods. 76 women with SUI with or without pelvic organ prolapse after sling surgery. They underwent sling surgery alone (S group, n=36) or concomitant TVM (M group, n=40). All patients underwent urinalysis, pelvic examinations, urodynamic study, 3D perineal ultrasonography, and personal interviews before and 1 year after surgery. The urethral area was calculated from the axial plane of perineal ultrasonography by multiplying π by the long and short axes of the urethral lumen. Results. The axial area of the middle and distal urethra during straining was significantly smaller than at rest in both groups (P<0.001). In addition, the length of the short axis of the proximal urethra was significantly shorter in those undergoing sling surgery alone during straining compared with those undergoing concomitant sling and mesh surgery (P<0.001). Conclusions. There was a greater impact on the proximal urethra in women who underwent sling surgery alone than those who underwent sling and TVM surgery together.

1. Introduction

Pelvic floor disorders are common in older women, with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI) accounting for 80% of pelvic floor dysfunction [1, 2]. The lifetime risk of undergoing surgery for SUI or POP has been reported to be around 11% [3]. With regard to the clinical presentation, these conditions may occur concurrently, or as symptomatic prolapse without SUI or as symptomatic incontinence without obvious prolapse. Bai et al. reported that 63.3% of patients with primary SUI have coexisting POP and that 62.7% of patients with primary POP have coexisting SUI [1].

SUI can be hidden when protruding POP causes the urethra to kink, and occult SUI can be detected from the clinical history and urodynamic reduction test [4]. Accordingly, the rate of postoperative SUI is high at around 51% when a reduction test is positive in preoperative urodynamic studies. Midurethral sling surgery is currently the recommended procedure for SUI [5] and with concomitant sling and transvaginal mesh (TVM) for symptomatic SUI and POP significantly reduced postoperative SUI from previous reports [6–9].

TVM surgery can provide excellent results for women with POP because of a fibrotic effect between the vagina and mesh resulting in good support of the pelvic organs [10]. However, whether there would be less sling compression of the urethra due to the limited mobility of the bladder neck after concomitant TVM is unknown. Clinically, the cure rate of SUI after prolapse surgery concomitant midurethral sling does not seem to be as high as after midurethral sling in women with symptomatic SUI without POP.

The assessment of sling tape using ultrasonography has been widely discussed [11].

However, studies related to interactions between sling and TVM are lacking. Three-dimensional (3D) ultrasonography can provide information on pelvic organ anatomy after sling and/or TVM with simultaneous axial, sagittal, and coronal views [11, 12]. The aim of this study was to compare the urethral compression effect following sling surgery with or without TVM using 3D ultrasonography.

2. Patients and Methods

We reviewed the charts of 76 women diagnosed between June 2007 and December 2008 with urodynamic stress incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse with urodynamic stress incontinence or occult SUI, defined as pelvic organ prolapse masking preexisting SUI due to urethral kinking. Occult SUI was diagnosed by clinical history and positive findings on a prolapse reductive test during urodynamic studies.

The patients’ history provided clues for occult SUI including (1) incontinence that improved with worsening of pelvic organ prolapse, (2) the need to reposition the prolapse to void, and (3) incontinence with a pessary or reduction of pelvic organ prolapse. Of the 76 women who underwent sling surgery, 40 also underwent transvaginal mesh surgery and 36 did not. Of the 36 women who only underwent sling surgery, 22 underwent tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) (Gynecare TVT System, Ethicon, Inc., Somerville, NJ) surgery and 14 underwent transobturator vaginal tape (TOT) (Monarc; American Medicall Systems, Minnetonka, MN) surgery. The choice of sling type depended on surgeon preference. Of the 40 women who underwent both sling and mesh surgery, 16 underwent TVT surgery and 24 underwent TOT surgery. Routine assessments performed before and 1 year after the procedures included urinalysis, pelvic examinations, and personal interviews using the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Questionnaire [13] and 3D perineal ultrasonography (Figure 1).

Figure 1

Lower urinary tract on three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound imaging in a woman with tension-free vaginal transobturator tape. The top left image shows the midsagittal view (A-plane), with the tape visible as a hyperechogenic stripe just ventral (left) of the central marker dot. The top right image is a coronal view (B-plane) and the bottom left is the axial or C-plane, showing the tape as a shallow “v” (rotated 90° anticlockwise) to the left of the central marker. The bottom right image is the resulting rendered volume [12].

We retrospectively analyzed data from a database of mid-urethral sling patients who underwent translabial ultrasound. The Voluson General Electric Sonography, expert 730 type (GE, Healthcare Ultrasound, Zipf, Austria) Ultrasonography was used with 3.5 MHZ curved linear-array transducer placed between the major labia and underneath the external urethral orifice. The assessments included measurement of the angle (θ) between the two arms of the sling and calculation of the hypoechoic area of the urethra by multiplying π by the lengths of the short and long axes of the urethral core, at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver (Figure 2).

The two investigators (K.L.L. and C.Y.L.) were blinded to each other’s results, the type of surgery, and the surgical outcome. They measured every parameter twice and the average of the two measurements was used for statistical analysis. Intraobserver reliability was assessed by the first investigator (K.L.L.), who performed two series of analyses with an interval of 7 to 14 days between them and who was blinded to the previous analysis. Interobserver reliability was assessed by two independent investigators (KLL and CYL). A test-retest series for all parameters showed good interobserver agreement, and the intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.609 to 0.885.

A patient was judged to have been subjectively “cured” when they had no symptoms of SUI on the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms

Questionnaire and pad test result are less than 2g. The “improved” was defined as the subjective improvement of SUI with pad test > 2g. “Failure” means both no subjective improvement of SUI and pad test>2g. Ethical approval for the retrospective collection of chart data was given by the Institutional Review Board of Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiao-Kang Hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with urogynecologic regulations. Statistical analysis was performed with the paired t-test for continuous variables, and the χ2 test and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

There were no differences between the sling and sling with mesh groups in body weight, parity, menopausal status, and current use of hormones; however the sling with mesh group was older (Table 1). The older age in the sling with mesh group may have been related to higher parity and menopausal status. Twenty-one patients underwent anterior mesh and 19 underwent both anterior and posterior mesh procedures in the sling with mesh group. Twenty-two patients underwent TVT and fourteen patients underwent TOT in the sling group, compared to sixteen and twenty-four patients, respectively, in the sling with mesh group (Table 2). There were no significant differences in sling type between the two groups. After surgery, the short axis, long axis, and areas of proximal, middle, and distal urethra were similar between the two groups at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver (Table 3). There were also no significant differences in angulation of the two arms of the sling between the two groups at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver. The distance from the tape to the urethra in the two groups at rest and during the Valsalva maneuver was also similar.

The short and long axes and area of the middle urethra significantly decreased from rest to the Valsalva maneuver in both groups (P < 0.001) (Table 4). The short axis of the distal urethra also decreased. However, the short axis of the proximal urethra significantly decreased from rest to the Valsalva compared to a greater extent in the sling group compared to the sling and mesh group (sling: P < 0.001, mesh: P = 0.027). The angulation of the two arms of the sling and the distance from the tape to the urethra significantly differed from rest to the Valsalva maneuver in both groups. One year after surgery, 71 women had improvement of SUI symptoms and were defined as successful treatment, and only five had persistent SUI problems and were defined as having failed treatment (Table 6). The short and long axes and the area of the middle urethra and the short axis of the distal urethra significantly decreased from rest to the Valsalva maneuver in both the successful and failed treatment groups. The significant compression effect from rest to the Valsalva maneuver in the short axis of the proximal urethra in the successful treatment group was found compared to the failed treatment group (P = 0.01/ P = 0.14) (Table 5).

The cure rate of SUI is 80.6% in the sling group and 67.5 % in the mesh group (29/30 versus 27/40, P=0.20). Six patients in the sling group and nine patients in the mesh group are deemed to be improved (6.5% versus 12.4%, P=0.52). One patient in the sling group and four patients in the mesh group defined failure (14% versus 5.2 %, P=0.36). The efficacy of surgery is 97.2% (35/36) in the sling group and 90 % (36/40) in the mesh group (Table 6).

4. Discussion

Long et al. [14] and Yang et al. [15] reported that TVT seems to undergo greater urethral compression than TOT or TVTO in ultrasound findings [16]. Differences in the sling type may therefore result in different cure rates of SUI [17]. In the current study, the percentage of patients receiving TVT and TOT was similar in both groups, so variability in sling type had a minimal effect on the cure rate of SUI.

Long et al. [18] reported that the bladder neck was localized more cranially with the use of a tension-free bladder neck sling when straining is compared to the preoperative condition. It is known that transvaginal synthetic mesh reconstruction provides cystocele support from the bladder to the bladder base due to a mesh fibrosis and stiffness effect, and this seems to limit the mobility of the bladder when straining. Hammock hypothesized [19] that abdominal pressure causes the urethra and bladder to descend against the supportive tissue of the vagina, thereby compressing the urethra causing it to close to prevent urinary leakage. Therefore, poor bladder mobility after transvaginal mesh surgery may explain the lesser compressive effect of the sling during the Valsalva maneuver. Lo et al. [20] reported that the mobility of the mesh and/or bladder neck had an important role in determining the success rate of middle urethral sling surgery in sonography findings. In the current study, the lesser compressive effect was reflected in the short axis of the proximal urethra in the sling and mesh group.

Consistent with the findings of Huang et al. [21], the success rate of treating SUI was comparable in the sling and sling and transvaginal mesh groups, although in ultrasound findings there was a higher incidence of proximal urethral compression from rest to straining in the women who only underwent sling surgery. We also found that a lesser compressive effect was detected in the short axis of the proximal urethra in the failed treatment group compared to the successful treatment group. A lesser sling compressive effect on the urethra in the postmesh surgery group may have been reflected in a lower cure rate of SUI compared to the sling only group; however this was not detected. It is possible that a higher number of cases or other urethral compression parameters can reflect subtle differences in sling compression in both the sling and sling and mesh groups.

Huang et al. [21] reported that the short-term success rates with slings in women who underwent TOT with or without anterior vaginal mesh were similar. In contrast, Stav et al. [22] reported that concurrent prolapse surgery was a major risk factor for recurrent SUI after 1 year. In the current study, greater compression of the short axis in the proximal urethra was only found in the sling surgery group, and more obvious significant differences between the two groups may have been found with more patients or a longer study period [6].

Yang [23] reported that the effectiveness of the sling depends on the mechanical interaction between the tape and urethra and that failure of a sling is related to a lack of urethral encroachment (kinking) at rest, bladder neck funneling, a urethral location of less than the 50th percentile, and a resting tape angle of less than 165 degrees, and they reported a high kinking rate in the successful treatment group compared to the failed treatment group (62% versus 15%). In the current study, we focused on the hypoechogenic area of the urethra and the distance between the tape and urethra at rest and during straining. It would also have been interesting to include more sonography parameters to highlight the differences between sling surgery with and without the use of anterior wall mesh.

The limitation of this study is that the retrospective nature may also have selection bias even though women who presented for treatment were included with usage of objective data. Otherwise the treatment choice of stress urinary incontinence depends on the surgeon’s preference. The compression effect of midurethral slings may be different though the report of Ross S [24], the subjectively successful rate of retropubic, and transobturator slings are similar. Furthermore, women with the intrinsic sphincter deficiency of SUI should be identified to lessen the bias of severity of SUI.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Kun-Ling Lin and Cheng-Yu Long wrote the main manuscript text. Yung-Shun Juan and Shih-hsiang Chou prepared Tables 1–6 and Figures 1-2.

Acknowledgments

The research for this paper was supported by the Kmhk-102-009 and Kmhk-100-030.

References

S. W. Bai, M. J. Jeon, J. Y. Kim, K. A. Chung, S. K. Kim, and K. H. Park, “Relationship between stress urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 256–260, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. Maher, B. Feiner, K. Baessler, and C. M. A. Glazener, “Surgical management of pelvic organ prolapse in women: The updated summary version Cochrane review,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 1445–1457, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Olsen, V. J. Smith, J. O. Bergstrom, J. C. Colling, and A. L. Clark, “Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 501–506, 1997.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Svenningsen, E. Borstad, A. E. Spydslaug, L. Sandvik, and A. C. Staff, “Occult incontinence as predictor for postoperative stress urinary incontinence following pelvic organ prolapse surgery,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 843–849, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ogah, J. D. Cody, and L. Rogerson, “Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 7, no. 4, Article ID CD006375, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Van Der Ploeg, A. Van Der Steen, K. Oude Rengerink, C. H. Van Der Vaart, and J. P. Roovers, “Prolapse surgery with or without stress incontinence surgery for pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 121, no. 5, pp. 537–547, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Van Der Ploeg, K. Oude Rengerink, A. Van Der Steen et al., “Transvaginal prolapse repair with or without the addition of a midurethral sling in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: A randomised trial,” BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, vol. 122, no. 7, pp. 1022–1030, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. De Tayrac, A. Gervaise, A. Chauveaud-Lambling, and H. Fernandez, “Combined genital prolapse repair reinforced with a polypropylene mesh and tension-free vaginal tape in women with genital prolapse and stress urinary incontinence: A retrospective case-control study with short-term follow-up,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 83, no. 10, pp. 950–954, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Wei, I. Nygaard, and H. E. Richter, “A midurethral sling to reduce incontinence after vaginal prolapse repair,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 366, Article ID 235857, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Borstad, M. Abdelnoor, A. C. Staff, and S. Kulseng-Hanssen, “Surgical strategies for women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary stress incontinence,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 179–186, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. P. Dietz, C. Barry, Y. N. Lim, and A. Rane, “Two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound imaging of suburethral slings,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 175–179, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-L. Lin, Y.-S. Juan, T.-S. Lo, C.-M. Liu, E.-M. Tsai, and C.-Y. Long, “Three-dimensional ultrasonographic assessment of compression effect on urethra following tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedures,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 452–457, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Jackson, J. Donovan, S. Brookes, S. Eckford, L. Swithinbank, and P. Abrams, “The bristol female lower urinary tract symptoms questionnaire:Development and psychometric testing,” British Journal of Urology, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 805–812, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-Y. Long, C.-S. Hsu, M.-P. Wu, C.-M. Liu, T.-N. Wang, and E.-M. Tsai, “Comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence,” Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 342–347, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J.-M. Yang and W.-C. Huang, “Sonographic findings in a case of voiding dysfunction secondary to the tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) procedure,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 302–304, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Y. Long, C. S. Hsu, T. S. Lo, C. M. Liu, Y. H. Chen, and E. M. Tsai, “Clinical and ultrasonographic comparison of tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator tape procedure for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 116–121, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chawla, “Transobturator tapes are preferable over transvaginal tapes for the management of female stress urinary incontinence: Against,” Indian Journal of Urology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 554–557, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-Y. Long, S.-C. Hsu, Y. Chang, Y.-C. Chen, J.-H. Su, and E.-M. Tsai, “The clinical and urodynamic effects of the tension free bladder neck sling procedure,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 344–349, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. O. L. DeLancey, “Structural support of the urethra as it relates to stress urinary incontinence: The hammock hypothesis,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 55, pp. 593–600, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Lo, Y. L. Tan, E. F. Cortes, Y. Lin, P. Wu, and L. B. Pue, “Influence of anterior vaginal mesh with concomitant mid-urethral sling surgery on stress urinary incontinen,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 55, pp. 593–600, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. C. Huang, S. H. Yang, J. M. Yang, and C. R. Tzeng, “Impact of concomitant anterior vaginal reconstructive surgery on transobturator suburethral tape procedures,” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 562–569, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Stav, P. L. Dwyer, and A. Rosamilia, “Risk factors of treatment failure of midurethral sling procedures for women with urinary stress incontinence,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 21, pp. 149–155, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
J.-M. Yang, S.-H. Yang, and W.-C. Huang, “Correlation of morphological alterations and functional impairment of the tension-free vaginal tape obturator procedure,” The Journal of Urology, vol. 181, no. 1, pp. 211–218, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Ross, S. Tang, M. Eliasziw et al., “Transobturator tape versus retropubic tension-free vaginal tape for stress urinary incontinence: 5-year safety and effectiveness outcomes following a randomised trial,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 879–886, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Kun-Ling Lin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

997

Downloads

1127

Citations