Review Article

Acceptance and Use of Innovative Assistive Technologies among People with Cognitive Impairment and Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review

Table 3

Timeline of included studies, generations according to Blackman et al. [7].

Year, titleFirst authorRef.ContextAcceptanceAdherence

1st generation
2007Cahill[20]HomeYesYes
2007Topo[47]HomeYesNo
2012Chen[22]HomeNoNo
2012Nijhof[40]ResidencyNoNo
2013Perilli[44]DaycenterYesNot adressed
2nd generation
2013Boise[19]HomeYesYes
2015Cavallo[21]Home+ residencyYesYes
2009Engström[23]ResidencyYesYes
2012Mitseva[38]HomeYesNo
2014Nijemeijer[39]ResidencyNoNo
3rd generation
2016Hattink[25]HomeNoNo
2013Imbeault[27]HomeYesYes
2015Karlsson[28]HomeNoNo
2015Kerkhof[29]ResidencyYesNo
2015Kerssens[30]HomeYesYes
2015Lazar[32]ResidencyYesYes
2016Lazar[33]ResidencyYesYes
2013Lim[34]HomeYesNot addressed
2013Lindquist[35]HomeYesNo
2015Lindguist[36]HomeYesNo
2014Magnusson[37]HomeYesNo
2013Nijhof[41]HomeYesNo
2015Oderud[42]HomeYesYes
2013Olsson[43]HomeYesYes
2012Pot[45]HomeYesYes
2016Thorpe[46]HomeYesNo
Robots (4th generation)
2013Granata[24]HomeYesNo
2017Hebesberger[26]HospitalNoNo
2017Khosla[31]ResidencyYesYes
2014Wu[48]Living LabNoNo