Research Article
Detecting Congestive Heart Failure by Extracting Multimodal Features and Employing Machine Learning Techniques
Table 3
CHF detection performance based on statistical features by applying machine learning techniques.
| Classifier | TPR (%) | TNR (%) | PPV (%) | NPV (%) | TA (%) | AUC | LB | UP |
| Decision tree (DT) | Fine | 81 | 68 | 68 | 81 | 75.9 | 0.77 | 0.19 | 0.68 | Coarse | 86 | 64 | 74 | 79 | 77.6 | 0.80 | 0.14 | 0.64 |
| Support vector machine (SVM) | Linear | 99 | 55 | 96 | 78 | 81.9 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.55 | Quadratic | 92 | 64 | 82 | 80 | 81.0 | 0.84 | 0.08 | 0.64 | Cubic | 85 | 61 | 71 | 78 | 75.9 | 0.78 | 0.15 | 0.61 | Med. Gaussian | 90 | 52 | 77 | 76 | 75.9 | 0.81 | 0.10 | 0.52 |
| K-nearest neighbor (KNN) | Fine | 78 | 55 | 60 | 74 | 69.0 | 0.66 | 0.22 | 0.56 | Medium | 89 | 43 | 70 | 72 | 71.6 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 0.43 | Cosine | 89 | 48 | 72 | 74 | 73.3 | 0.78 | 0.11 | 0.48 |
| Ensemble classifiers | Bagged tree | 85 | 66 | 73 | 80 | 77.6 | 0.81 | 0.15 | 0.66 | Subsp. disc. | 99 | 34 | 94 | 71 | 74.1 | 0.77 | 0.01 | 0.34 | RUSBoosted tree | 85 | 66 | 73 | 80 | 77.6 | 0.79 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
|
|