Preparation of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Embedded Electroconductive Multi-Microchannel Scaffolds for Neuron Growth under Electrical Stimulation

Liu, Zhenhui; Yushan, Maimaiaili; Alike, Yamuhanmode; Liu, Yanshi; Wu, Shuo; Ma, Chuang; Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4794982

BioMed Research International

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2020 | Article ID 4794982 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4794982

Preparation of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Embedded Electroconductive Multi-Microchannel Scaffolds for Neuron Growth under Electrical Stimulation

Zhenhui Liu,¹Maimaiaili Yushan,¹Yamuhanmode Alike,¹Yanshi Liu,¹Shuo Wu,¹Chuang Ma,¹and Aihemaitijiang Yusufu¹

Academic Editor: Kirsten Haastert-Talini

Received23 Sept 2019

Revised21 Feb 2020

Accepted22 Feb 2020

Published28 Mar 2020

Abstract

Objectives. To prepare the conductive MWCNT (multiwall carbon nanotube)-agarose scaffolds with multi-microchannel for neuron growth under electrical stimulation. Methods. The scaffolds were produced by gradient freeze and lyophilization methods. The synthesized materials were characterized by SEM and near-infrared spectroscopy, and their microstructure, swelling-deswelling, conductivity, biocompatibility, and shape memory behavior were measured. A three-dimensional culture model by implanting cells into scaffolds was built, and the behaviors of RSC96 cells on scaffolds under electrical stimulation were evaluated. Results. The addition of MWCNT did not affect the pore composition ratio and shape memory of agarose scaffolds, but 0.025% wt MWCNT in scaffolds improved the swelling ratio and water retention at the swelling equilibrium state. Though MWCNTs in high concentration had slight effect on proliferation of RSC96 cells and PC12 cells, there was no difference that the expressions of neurofilament of RSC96 cells on scaffolds with MWCNTs of different concentration. RSC96 cells arranged better along the longitudinal axis of scaffolds and showed better adhesion on both 0.025% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds and 0.05% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds compared to other scaffolds. Conclusions. Agarose scaffolds with MWCNTs possessed promising applicable prospect in peripheral nerve defects.

1. Introduction

The repair and reconstruction of peripheral nerve defects caused by severe trauma, tumor excision, and congenital malformation have been a great clinic problem when gaps exceed 25 mm, because of limited resource and unsatisfactory results of autologous nerve autografting [1–4]. Regenerated nerves with anatomical appearance could not conduct the normal bioelectric signal, which could significantly affect the recovery of nerve function seriously [5]. Thus, strategies remain to be identified to improve the rate and function of nerve regeneration.

Synthetic composites can be a promising tool to guide axonal regeneration when supplying neurotrophic and/or cellular support simultaneously. Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are increasingly used as biomedical material due to their excellent mechanical and electrical properties and high stability [6, 7]. CNTs can endow synthetic composites with good biocompatibility [8, 9], shape memory, mechanical properties [10], photothermal conversion ability, antibacterial properties [11], and conductivity which can simulate electrical conduction to guide the growth of nerve cells and promote myelination [12, 13], providing a new strategy for clinical peripheral nerve regeneration and functional reconstruction. However, CNTs were usually used as a component of composite materials, due to cytotoxicity of high concentration of carbon nanomaterials [7].

The use of agarose, with good biocompatibility and biodegradability, is in increasing expansion to satisfy different needs in bioengineering. As a saccharide polymer derived from seaweed, agarose is often used as a substrate for cell growth and bioengineering such as three-dimensional tissue growth, gene therapy, drug delivery and controlled release, and clinical application for its capacity to carry drugs and cells [14–25]. Combined with other materials to form composite materials, agarose is used to promote regeneration of skin, bone, cartilage, and nerve [22, 26–28]. However, agarose has poor electrical conductivity.

In this study, we reported the use of multiwall carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) to enhance the electrical conductivity and biological performance of agarose scaffold. Novel MWCNT-agarose scaffolds with multi-microchannels were synthesized. The pore distribution characteristics, swelling-deswelling behaviors, conductivity, biocompatibility, and shape memory of the scaffolds were evaluated. The suitability of scaffolds loaded with RSC96 cells for neural tissue engineering and electrical stimulation system was also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Fabrication of MWCNT-Agarose Scaffolds

The agarose solution, composed of 3% wt agarose (Biowest, Spain) and distilled water, was heated to 100°C until completely dissolved, injected to cylinder mold () while removed bubbles with a vacuum drier, and then allowed to cool to be solid [21]. The MWCNTs water suspension (XFM 31) was purchased from Nanjing XFNANO Materials Technology (Nanjing, China). The MWCNTs are 5–15 nm in inner diameter and less than 10 μm in length. The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images and further information can be found at XFNANO Inc. For the MWCNT-contained agarose solution, MWCNTs were blended before heating at concentrations of 0.025% wt, 0.05% wt, and 0.1% wt, respectively. The molds containing agarose with or without MWCNTs were placed into insulating Styrofoam except the bottom. The entire unit was placed on dry ice, and the bottom touched dry ice directly to create a uniaxial low temperature gradient for 2 h. Then the mold unit was taken out of the Styrofoam and lyophilized for 24 h. Agarose scaffolds with or without MWCNTs were removed from the mold for characterization. Figure 1 showed the fabrication process of the scaffolds.

2.2. Characterization of MWCNT-Agarose Scaffolds

2.2.1. Microstructure Analysis

Cylindrical scaffolds were sectioned into 1 mm thick samples in transverse planes and longitudinal planes by stainless-steel microtome blade for morphological observation. An SEM (HITACHI SU8010) was used to observe the transverse planes, and a stereomicroscope (Leica, M205, Germany) was applied to record the longitudinal planes of those scaffolds. Gold was sputtered onto the surface of scaffolds for 10 s prior to the imaging.

Near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRQuest, ocean optics, USA) was used to analyze the chemical composition of linear agarose scaffold with different concentration of MWCNTs. The excitation wavelength ranged from 900 cm⁻¹ to 2000 cm⁻¹.

The hydrated samples were placed on slides to be visualized by an LSM800 confocal microscope (Zeiss), and the area of the pores was directly measured by the Axio-Imager software (Zeiss) to calculate the proportion of the pore area to the total area (porosity) and analyze the proportion of each kind of pore size to the total pore numbers. Three different samples were randomly selected from each kind of scaffolds.

2.2.2. Swelling and Deswelling

The swelling behavior of linear agarose scaffolds with or without MWCNT was observed for 2580 min at a temperature of 25°C and a relative humidity of 65%. The freeze-dried scaffolds were weighed, then soaked in distilled water, and removed at a certain interval. After surface water was absorbed with filter paper, the scaffolds were weighed immediately [10, 30, 31]. There were 5 samples of each scaffold, and each sample was measured 3 times to calculate the swelling rate (SR) by the Equation (1) where SR, Ws, and Wd are the swelling rate of scaffolds at a certain time, the weight of scaffolds at a certain time, respectively, and the weight of dry scaffolds.

After the scaffolds reached swelling equilibrium at the temperature of 25°C and the relative humidity of 65%, the excess surface water was removed and weighed at a certain time interval to evaluate the swelling trend of the scaffolds. The measurement for each scaffold was an average of three times to calculate the water retention (WR) by Equation (2) where Wt is the weight of scaffold at a certain time of deswelling and We is the weight of swollen scaffold at equilibrium state [31, 32].

2.2.3. Conductivity of Scaffolds

The electrical conductivity of scaffolds with or without MWCNT was measured at equilibrium state of PBS absorption at room temperature. The swelling scaffolds were placed between two copper electrodes and measured with a conductivity meter (UT61E) [33]. According to Equation (3), the resistance ρ in (Ω. m) was calculated. [34] where is resistance of the scaffolds, is length, and is cross-sectional area, respectively.

The conductivity was calculated by using Equation (4)

2.2.4. Shape Memory of Scaffolds

The scaffolds which had reached the balance of water absorption reached deswelling equilibrium at room temperature and then were soaked in deionized water. The shape changes were observed by a digital video recorder (SONY) [10].

2.3. In Vitro Biocompatibility Study

The cylindrical scaffolds with a diameter of 4.6 mm were sliced into disc samples with a height of 2 mm. The samples were sterilized in 95% ethanol for 2 h, soaked in PBS overnight, then vacuum-dried for later use, and prewetted with 37°C complete medium before coculture with cells [35].

The RSC96 cells purchased from the ZhouQiaoXinZhou Biotechnology Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China) were cultured in DMEM (Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco) and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin (BI) under a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂ at 37°C. The RSC96 cells were seeded into the 96-well plates at a density of 3000 per well, and the prewet scaffolds were transferred into the corresponding wells at the same time. The cells in each group were cultured for 1 d, 3 d, and 5 d with five samples per group at each time point. RSC96 cells were observed in different culture conditions by a phase contrast microscope.10 μl CCK8 solution (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 37°C and then the absorbance OD value at 450 nm was analyzed by Thermo Scientific Multiskan GO Spectrophotometer (USA). RSC96 cells cultured on Glass Bottom Dish with scaffolds for 3 d were washed with PBS, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min, and washed with PBS again. After soaked in 0.15% Triton X-100 for 10 min and blocked in 10% bull serum albumin for 30 min, cells were incubated with antibodies anti-NF-H at 1 : 200 dilution at 4°C overnight, followed by incubation with secondary antibodies conjugated to Flour 488 at 1 : 200 dilution for 2 h in dark and counterstain with DAPI at 1 : 20 000 dilution for 10 min at room temperature. An inverted laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica TCS, Germany) was used to investigate the samples. Quantitative analyses of immunofluorescence were implemented by Image-Pro Plus 4.5 software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA).

The PC12 cells purchased from the ZhouQiaoXinZhou Biotechnology Co. Ltd (Shanghai, China) were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% FBS (Gibco) and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and 100 U/ml penicillin (BI). PC12 cells were cocultured with scaffolds at a concentration of 5000 per well, and the OD value was determined by the CCK8 method as RSC96 cells. The scaffolds cocultured with PC12 cells were fixed by 2.5% glutaraldehyde for 4 h and dehydrated by graded ethanol. After sputtered with gold, scaffolds were imaged by SEM.

2.4. Three-Dimensional Cultured Model of RSC96 Cells

The cylindrical scaffolds with a diameter of 4.6 mm and a height of 12 mm were sterilized in 95% ethanol for 2 h, then soaked in PBS overnight. After vacuum-dried and incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h, scaffolds conducted deswelling-shrinking behavior. RSC96 cell suspension of 10 μl was added to the scaffolds at a dense of 20 000 cells per scaffold and then absorbed into scaffolds evenly due to the shape memory property of scaffolds. After incubation for half an hour, the scaffolds were transferred to a new 6-well plate, and complete medium was added to the plate for cell growth study under a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO₂ at 37°C. Medium was changed every other day.

The RSC96 cells on control scaffolds could be observed directly by a phase contrast microscope (Leica, Germany). After stained with DAPI at 1 : 20 000 dilution in PBS for 10 min, cells could be imaged by an inverted laser scanning confocal microscope (Leica, Germany). The scaffolds were divided into electrical stimulation (ES) group and the control group. Our customized electrical stimulator equipment consisted of the pulse stimulator and electrode attached to 6 well plate lid. ES groups were performed by applying voltage of 3-4 V, time of 30 min per day, frequency of 10 Hz, and continue waves in a Clean Bench [13].

Samples cultured for 7 d were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 30 min at room temperature, embedded in paraffin and then cut into 5 μm thick longitudinal sections. These sections were stained with hematoxylin for 5 min, washed with distilled water for 1 minter, stained with 0.5% eosin for 2 min, washed with distilled water, permeabilized, and mounted. Growth features of cells on scaffolds were observed using an optical microscope [36] (DM3000B; Leica).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

All quantitative data were presented as and analyzed using SPSS software, version 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Multiple group comparisons were conducted by one-way analysis of variance followed by LSD post-hoc test. was considered as statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Characterization of Multi-Microchannel MWCNT-Agarose Scaffold

3.1.1. Microstructure Analysis

Figure 2 showed the consistent morphology and porosity of scaffolds with or without MWCNT, presenting a microhoneycomb linear channel and penetrating the whole scaffold. It could be seen that MWCNTs and agarose fused well. Raman spectra were used to further characterize the chemical state of MWCNTs encapsulated in agarose scaffolds. Figure 2(j) showed that 0.1% wt MWCNT-agarose scaffolds showed characteristic peaks different from other scaffolds. The graphitized structure of MWCNTs had a Raman displacement called D-band at 1350 cm^-1, and no characteristic peak was found in the MWCNT scaffolds below 0.1% wt.

Figure 2

SEM images and RAMAN spectra of multi-microchannel scaffolds. (a)-(d): SEM images of multi-microchannel MWCNT-agarose scaffolds with MWCNT concentrations of 0% wt, 0.025% wt, 0.05% wt, and 0.1% wt, respectively. (e) showed scaffold with 0.1% wt MWCNTs on the surface at 30 K magnification. (f)-(i) Longitudinal section images of multi-microchannel MWCNT-agarose scaffolds with MWCNTs concentrations of 0% wt, 0.025% wt, 0.05% wt, and 0.1% wt, respectively. (j) showed the characteristic peak of MWCNTs could be observed at about 1350 cm^-1 in 0.1% wt MWCNT-agarose scaffold.

The porosity of scaffold without MWCNT was %, scaffold with 0.025% wt MWCNTs was , scaffold with 0.05% wt MWCNTs was , and scaffold with 0.1% wt MWCNTs was . There was no difference in the porosity among these groups (). According to the size of the pore area, pores were divided into six types: 0–10 000 μm², 10 000–20 000 μm², 20 000–30 000 μm², 30 000–40 000 μm², 40 000–50 000 μm², and 50 000–60 000 μm². The largest number proportion of pores with an area of 0–10 000 μm² was , followed by pores with an area of 10 000–20 000 μm² () and (). These numbers of pores were higher than all the others (). There was no difference in the pore composition ratio of different pore size among the four kinds of scaffolds (see Figure 3).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.1.2. Swelling and Deswelling

The swelling behavior of scaffolds with or without MWCNT showed SR of all the scaffolds increased with time and reached a swelling equilibrium state at the 180 min. No difference was found in the increase rate of SR among groups. The 0.025% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds had higher swelling ratio than others at the equilibrium state. The deswelling behavior of scaffolds showed the water retention of each scaffold decreased linearly with time. The 0.025% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds had higher water retention than the others after the 100 min (see Figure 4).

(a)

(b)

3.1.3. Conductivity of Scaffolds

The conductivity of control scaffolds, scaffolds with 0.025% MWCNT, scaffold with 0.05% MWCNT, and scaffold with 0.1% MWCNT was measured to be , , , and . Figure 5 showed that the conductivity of scaffolds was improved gradually with increasing of MWCNTs concentration.

(a)

(b)

3.1.4. Shape Memory Characterization of Scaffolds

When the scaffolds reached the balance state of deswelling at room temperature, the cylindrical structure of all the scaffolds collapsed. However, 0.1% MWCNT-agarose scaffold deformed more severely than others. After being soaked in distilled water, all the scaffolds absorbed water quickly and recovered completely to their original shape within the180 s (see Figure 6).

3.2. In Vitro Biocompatibility

The cytotoxicity of scaffolds to RSC96 cells and PC12 cells was evaluated by the CCK8 assay (see Figures 7 and 8). The results showed agarose scaffolds without MWCNT and with 0.025% MWCNT were not cytotoxic to RSC96 cells and PC12 cells on day 1 and day 3. Agarose scaffolds with 0.05% MWCNT and 0.1% MWCNT had cytotoxicity to SCs while only agarose scaffolds with 0.1% MWCNT had cytotoxicity to PC12 cells on day 5. However, no difference of the relative expressions of neurofilament was found between agarose scaffolds with MWCNTs of different concentration and without MWCNTs. Besides, the PC12 cells could be observed that they were attached to all the scaffolds by SEM.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Figure 7

Proliferation of RSC96 cells. (a) Observation of RSC96 cell proliferation in different culture conditions under a phase contrast microscope. (b) RSC96 cell proliferation measured by CCK8 assay, and the result showed that the scaffolds with 0.05% MWCNT and 0.1% MWCNT demonstrated cytotoxicity on day 3 and day 5 (). (c) showed the neurofilament images of RSC96 cells cocultured with scaffolds by immunofluorescence. . (d) showed the relative expressions of NF through cell immunofluorescence intensity on scaffolds with different concentration of MWCNTs and compared with the control scaffolds after cultured for 3 days. No difference was found between any two scaffolds.

(a)

(b)

(c)

3.3. Three-Dimensional Cultured Model of RSC96 Cells

By observing RSC96 cell growth behavior in answer to electrical stimulation, further evaluation of the scaffolds in neural tissue engineering for their potential application was done. Figure 9 showed the integral design of the electrical stimulation installation, and Figure 10 showed the growth of RSC96 cells on the scaffolds. Accompanying by the formation of cell clumps, cells grew robustly on all the scaffolds without electrical stimulation. However, when electrical stimulation was applied on scaffolds, RSC96 cell layers arranged better along the longitudinal axis of scaffolds and showed better adhesion on both 0.025% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds and 0.05% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds than other scaffolds.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

(g)

4. Discussion

In this study, we prepared multi-microchannel electroconductive neural scaffolds, built a three-dimensional culture model by implanting cells into scaffolds and observed that RSC96 cell layers arranged better along the longitudinal axis of electroconductive scaffolds under ES, and showed better adhesion on both 0.025% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds and 0.05% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds than other scaffolds. Our electroconductive neural scaffolds mimic the native three-dimensional extracellular matrix to provide guidance channels for nerve cells, and ES applied on conductive scaffolds can simulate physiological neuronal activity to promote the directional growth of nerve cells, which might be highly beneficial for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Although a variety of nerve conduits or scaffolds have been developed in the past decades, it remains challenging to repair long peripheral nerve gaps due to the target muscular atrophy for lack of specific signals and cues to guide the axons to the distal stump. Biomimicking concept is one option in the development of customized tissue engineering. Wu et al. prepare a 3D hybrid scaffold based on NFYs-NET layers within a hydrogel shell for mimicking the native cardiac tissue structure and demonstrated their great potential for engineering anisotropic 3D cardiac constructs [37]. They developed aligned core-shell composite biomimetic scaffolds based on aligned conductive NFYs core and hydrogel shell to mimic the hierarchically aligned 3D structure of the native nerve tissue [38]. Stokols et al. used agarose scaffolds with uniaxial channels to stimulate and guide linear axonal growth in a spinal cord injury model [22]. We evaluated anatomy-based nerve conduits in vitro and in vivo and found that multichannel nerve conduit had improved the nerve regeneration by reducing the mismatch of nerve axons in our previous research [36]. We observed that multichannel guidance contributed to limiting axonal dispersion without decreasing quantitative results of regeneration. Hollow nerve conduit was not suitable for large peripheral nerve gap for lack of axon growth-promoting substrates. Longitudinally oriented microstructure of the multi-microchannel nerve scaffolds mimics some of the natural topographical features of normal peripheral nerves and provides the framework to guide glial cell migration and axonal growth [39]. On the other hand, the multi-microchannel scaffolds can provide 3D environments which are conducive to cell attachment, migration, proliferation, and differention and helpful to generate complicated structure of newly formed tissues [40].

Electrical stimulation is well-known for promoting nerve regeneration and functional recovery [41–43]. While cellular behaviors after ES have been widely reported, the results are not yet determined. Some reports revealed ES could promote correct reinnervation and help axons cross the nerve repair site or nerve guidance channels, but it did not increase the speed of axonal elongation [44–50]. Besides, ES was believed to activate neuronal differentiation [35, 51, 52], and robust neuron regeneration was observed in vivo experiments on conductive materials with ES [53, 54]. Recent studies found enhanced neurite outgrowth following ES [41, 55]. Therefore, we observed that RSC96 cell layers arranged along the longitudinal axis under ES in Figure 10(g). This phenomenon was analogous to bands of Büngner, which was essential for nerve regeneration, indicating that our multichannel nerve scaffolds may have potential application in promoting linear axon growth through long-distance nerve defect to improve functional recovery.

As central part of the nerval biomimicking concept, the electrical conduction of nerve scaffolds is a factor that cannot be ignored. Bioelectricity plays an indispensable role in sustaining normal biological functions through tissue engineering [56]. Neurons in the nervous system are electrically excitable cells that transmit signals at a quick pace [57]. Conductive scaffolds are developed to enhance the regeneration in peripheral nerve tissue engineering. Wu et al. found that electroactive biodegradable polyurethane significantly enhanced Schwann cells myelin gene expression and neurotrophin secretion by providing suitable microenvironment [58]. Conductive scaffolds were also found to maintain PC12 cells in more active proliferation and neurite growth as well as upregulate GAP43 and SYP protein and gene expression levels [59, 60]. Carbon nanomaterial is also one of the conductive sources for biomaterials to achieve conductivity. CNTs can endow nanocomposites with excellent electrical properties, good cell adhesion, and tissue formation at a low concentration, which is determined by their nanoscale structure. Owing to an extremely high-length diameter ratio, CNTs can easily form a conductive network, which helps to improve the conductivity of nanocomposites [61–63]. In our study, we observed that the conductivity of agarose scaffolds was improved with the increased concentration of MWCNT compared with agarose scaffolds alone.

Poor functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury has been generally attributed to inability of denervated muscles to accept reinnervation and recover from denervation atrophy [64]. Ahadian et al. developed gelatin methacrylate hybrid hydrogels containing CNTs and promoted higher maturation of muscle myofibers [65]. Conductive materials have been demonstrated to promote electrical-responsive cell proliferation and enhance the myotube formation [40]. Therefore, conductive materials have shown a promising prospect in muscle tissue engineering. More studies of CNTs need to be performed to avoid atrophy of target muscle tissue.

It is well-known that agarose has good biocompatibility, and CNTs show potential in biomedicine as their low toxicity [9, 14, 15]. High concentration MWCNTs were supposed to have cytotoxicity caused by reactive oxygen in cells and damage of cell member when contacting to MWCNTs [7, 66–68]. It was reported that GelMA-coated CNTs with a concentration of 0.5 mg/ml had significative cytotoxicity [69]. In this study, we found only agarose scaffolds with 0.1% wt MWCNT have limited effect on the proliferation of RSC96 cells and PC12 cells. The cytotoxicity of CNTs coated in agarose might be reduced compared to the cytotoxicity of bare CNTs, which may explain why cells proliferation did not decrease obviously in our research.

Swelling and deswelling behaviors of scaffolds in aqueous are essential in biomedical applications because they control the diffusion and release of drugs and nutrients in tissue application [23]. The high swelling and deswelling rate of MWCNT-agarose scaffolds might be ascribed to the hydrophilicity nature of both agarose and water dispersed MWCNTs or/and changes of agarose scaffolds in spatial structure caused by MWCNTs [10, 22, 70]. As the concentration of MWCNT increases, the swelling and deswelling rate of scaffolds reduce may be attributed to the decrease of free space among agarose chains. The 0.025% MWCNT-agarose scaffolds showed higher water retention than the others, demonstrating 0.025% wt MWCNTs were near to the optimum concentration between MWCNTs and agarose. Furthermore, the water-dispersed MWCNTs showed no impact on the expressions of neurofilament, which are neuron structural element [71, 72]. This supports their application in peripheral nerve.

Scaffolds with function of shape memory are convenient for transportation, preservation, and minimally invasive approach [73]. They can regain their initial shape by recruiting extracellular fluid when agarose chains maintain their mobility and recover to their primitive position [31].

The construction of scaffolds is easy to implement, without the employment of chemical crosslinking and organic solvents; therefore, the risk of introducing toxic molecules into the scaffolds is low. The linear pores produced by gradient freeze and lyophilization constitute multi-microchannels which extend through the full length of scaffolds. However, MWCNTs dispersed in the agarose well did not alter the porosity and pore area distribution of agarose scaffold as shown in Figure 3. We evaluated pore size by pore area instead of pore diameter, which displayed the size of pores better than the previous literatures because the pores were not regular. The pore areas of the hydrated scaffolds were distributed around 10 000 μm², which were consistent with previous reports [22] and beneficial for cell attachment [23, 74].

In our study, scaffolds with lower MWCNT concentration had no cytotoxicity effect on cell proliferation compared to any other group on day 5 without electrical stimulation. CNTs show potential in biomedicine as their low toxicity [9]. The cytotoxicity of high concentration MWCNTs is supposed to be caused by reactive oxygen in cells and damage of cell member when contacting to MWCNTs [7, 66–68]. However, no significative cytotoxicity of GelMA-coated CNTs was found up to the CNT concentration of 0.5 mg/ml [69]. The cytotoxicity of CNTs coated in agarose might be reduced compared to the cytotoxicity of bare CNTs, which may explain why cell proliferation did not decrease obviously in our research.

5. Conclusion

We successfully utilized water-dispersed MWCNT and agarose to fabricate multi-microchannel electroconductive neural scaffolds by gradient freeze and lyophilization method in this study. The MWCNT-agarose scaffolds mimic the function and the three-dimensional structure of the peripheral nerve, thereby guiding linear growth of RSC96 cells under electrical stimulations. This study may provide an applicable composite material to fabricate electroconductive nerve guiding scaffolds, which can be used in the repair of the peripheral nerve defects.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy restrictions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Zhenhui Liu and Aihemaitijiang Yusufu conceptualized the study; Zhenhui Liu and Yanshi Liu worked on data curation; Zhenhui Liu and Aihemaitijiang Yusufu did the formal analysis; Zhenhui Liu and Shuo Wu did the investigation; Zhenhui Liu, Yamuhanmode·Alike, Maimaiaili Yusan, and Chuang Ma did the methodology; Zhenhui Liu and Maimaiaili Yusan worked on the project administration; Aihemaitijiang Yusufu helped in the resources; Zhenhui Liu and Yanshi Liu helped in the software; Zhenhui Liu and Yamuhanmode·Alike supervised the study; Zhenhui Liu and Yamuhanmode·Alike validated the study; Zhenhui Liu visualized the study; Zhenhui Liu contributed in writing the original draft; and Zhenhui Liu and Aihemaitijiang Yusufu contributed in writing: review and editing. Zhenhui Liu and Maimaiaili·Yushan contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81560357 and 81760397).

References

B. Han, J. Y. Zhao, W. T. Wang, Z. W. Li, A. P. He, and X. Y. Song, “Cdc42 promotes Schwann cell proliferation and migration through Wnt/β-Catenin and p38 MAPK signaling pathway after sciatic nerve injury,” Neurochemical Research, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 1317–1324, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. El Soury and G. Gambarotta, “Soluble neuregulin-1 (NRG1): a factor promoting peripheral nerve regeneration by affecting Schwann cell activity immediately after injury,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 1374-1375, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Griffin, M. V. Hogan, A. B. Chhabra, and D. N. Deal, “Peripheral nerve repair and reconstruction,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume, vol. 95, no. 23, pp. 2144–2151, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Grinsell and C. P. Keating, “Peripheral nerve reconstruction after injury: a review of clinical and experimental therapies,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2014, Article ID 698256, 13 pages, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Ryan, W. A. Lackington, A. J. Hibbitts et al., “A physicochemically optimized and neuroconductive biphasic nerve guidance conduit for peripheral nerve repair,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 6, no. 24, article 1700954, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. R. Fadel and T. M. Fahmy, “Immunotherapy applications of carbon nanotubes: from design to safe applications,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 198–209, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Chen, Y. Sun, J. Liang et al., “Understanding the influence of carbon nanomaterials on microbial communities,” Environment International, vol. 126, pp. 690–698, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zheng, K. M. Woeppel, A. Y. Griffith et al., “Soft conducting elastomer for peripheral nerve Interface,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 8, no. 9, article e1801311, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Wang, P. Li, D. Yu et al., “Unraveling the enzymatic activity of oxygenated carbon nanotubes and their application in the treatment of bacterial infections,” Nano Letters, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 3344–3351, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, T. Song, M. Chang et al., “Carbon nanotubes reinforced maleic anhydride-modified xylan-g-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) hydrogel with multifunctional properties,” Materials, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 354, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zhao, B. Guo, H. Wu, Y. Liang, and P. X. Ma, “Injectable antibacterial conductive nanocomposite cryogels with rapid shape recovery for noncompressible hemorrhage and wound healing,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 2784, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. M. Pedrotty, V. Kuzmenko, E. Karabulut et al., “Three-dimensional printed biopatches with conductive ink facilitate cardiac conduction when applied to disrupted myocardium,” Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, vol. 12, no. 3, article e006920, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Reddy, Q. Xiao, H. Liu et al., “Bionanotube/poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanohybrid as an electrode for the neural Interface and dopamine sensor,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 20, pp. 18254–18267, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Scarano, F. Carinci, and A. Piattelli, “Lip augmentation with a new filler (agarose gel): a 3-year follow-up study,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontics, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. e11–e15, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Gu, Y. Tabata, Y. Kawakami et al., “Development of a new method to induce angiogenesis at subcutaneous site of Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats for islet transplantation,” Cell Transplantation, vol. 10, no. 4-5, pp. 453–457, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Varoni, M. Tschon, B. Palazzo, P. Nitti, L. Martini, and L. Rimondini, “Agarose gel as biomaterial or scaffold for implantation surgery: characterization, histological and histomorphometric study on soft tissue response,” Connective Tissue Research, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 548–554, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fernandez-Cossio, A. Leon-Mateos, F. G. Sampedro, and M. T. Oreja, “Biocompatibility of agarose gel as a dermal filler: histologic evaluation of subcutaneous implants,” Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 120, no. 5, pp. 1161–1169, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. L. Xu, J. Lou, T. Tang et al., “Evaluation of different scaffolds for BMP-2 genetic orthopedic tissue engineering,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials, vol. 75B, no. 2, pp. 289–303, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Iafisco, E. Varoni, E. Battistella et al., “The cooperative effect of size and crystallinity degree on the resorption of biomimetic hydroxyapatite for soft tissue augmentation,” The International Journal of Artificial Organs, vol. 33, no. 11, pp. 765–774, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Rossi, M. Santoro, T. Casalini, P. Veglianese, M. Masi, and G. Perale, “Characterization and degradation behavior of agar-carbomer based hydrogels for drug delivery applications: solute effect,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 3394–3408, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Stokols and M. H. Tuszynski, “The fabrication and characterization of linearly oriented nerve guidance scaffolds for spinal cord injury,” Biomaterials, vol. 25, no. 27, pp. 5839–5846, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Stokols and M. H. Tuszynski, “Freeze-dried agarose scaffolds with uniaxial channels stimulate and guide linear axonal growth following spinal cord injury,” Biomaterials, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 443–451, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Felfel, M. J. Gideon-Adeniyi, K. M. Zakir Hossain, G. A. F. Roberts, and D. M. Grant, “Structural, mechanical and swelling characteristics of 3D scaffolds from chitosan-agarose blends,” Carbohydrate Polymers, vol. 204, pp. 59–67, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Vadivelu, N. Kashaninejad, K. R. Sreejith, R. Bhattacharjee, I. Cock, and N. T. Nguyen, “Cryoprotectant-free freezing of cells using liquid marbles filled with hydrogel,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 50, pp. 43439–43449, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. B. Highley, K. H. Song, A. C. Daly, and J. A. Burdick, “Jammed microgel inks for 3D printing applications,” Advanced Science, vol. 6, no. 1, article 1801076, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zeng, Y. Han, H. Li, and J. Chang, “Design of a thermosensitive bioglass/agarose–alginate composite hydrogel for chronic wound healing,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol. 3, no. 45, pp. 8856–8864, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zhu, L. Kong, F. Farhadi et al., “An injectable continuous stratified structurally and functionally biomimetic construct for enhancing osteochondral regeneration,” Biomaterials, vol. 192, pp. 149–158, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Paris, N. Lafuente-Gomez, M. V. Cabanas, J. Roman, J. Pena, and M. Vallet-Regi, “Fabrication of a nanoparticle-containing 3D porous bone scaffold with proangiogenic and antibacterial properties,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 86, pp. 441–449, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Zucca, R. Fernandez-Lafuente, and E. Sanjust, “Agarose and its derivatives as supports for enzyme immobilization,” Molecules, vol. 21, no. 11, p. 1577, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, A. Patel, A. K. Gaharwar et al., “Hyperbranched polyester hydrogels with controlled drug release and cell adhesion properties,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 1299–1310, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Atoufi, P. Zarrintaj, G. H. Motlagh, A. Amiri, Z. Bagher, and S. K. Kamrava, “A novel bio electro active alginate-aniline tetramer/ agarose scaffold for tissue engineering: synthesis, characterization, drug release and cell culture study,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 1617–1638, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sadeghi and H. Hosseinzadeh, “Synthesis and properties of collagen-g-poly(sodium acrylate-co-2-hydroxyethylacrylate) superabsorbent hydrogels,” Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 379–389, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, Z. Z. Pan, W. Lv et al., “A directional strain sensor based on anisotropic microhoneycomb cellulose nanofiber-carbon nanotube hybrid aerogels prepared by unidirectional freeze drying,” Small, vol. 15, no. 14, article e1805363, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Atoufi, P. Zarrintaj, G. H. Motlagh, A. Amiri, Z. Bagher, and S. K. Kamrava, “A novel bio electro active alginate-aniline tetramer/agarose scaffold for tissue engineering: synthesis, characterization, drug release and cell culture study,” Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition, vol. 28, no. 15, pp. 1617–1638, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Lee, W. Zhu, M. Nowicki et al., “3D printing nano conductive multi-walled carbon nanotube scaffolds for nerve regeneration,” Journal of Neural Engineering, vol. 15, no. 1, article 016018, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Alike, M. Yushan, A. Keremu et al., “Application of custom anatomy-based nerve conduits on rabbit sciatic nerve defects: \in vitro and in vivo evaluations,” Neural Regeneration Research, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 2173–2182, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, L. Wang, B. Guo, and P. X. Ma, “Interwoven aligned conductive nanofiber yarn/hydrogel composite scaffolds for engineered 3D cardiac anisotropy,” ACS Nano, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 5646–5659, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, Y. Wu, T. Hu, P. X. Ma, and B. Guo, “Aligned conductive core-shell biomimetic scaffolds based on nanofiber yarns/hydrogel for enhanced 3D neurite outgrowth alignment and elongation,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 96, pp. 175–187, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bozkurt, F. Lassner, D. O'Dey et al., “The role of microstructured and interconnected pore channels in a collagen-based nerve guide on axonal regeneration in peripheral nerves,” Biomaterials, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 1363–1375, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Dong, P. X. Ma, and B. Guo, “Conductive biomaterials for muscle tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 229, article 119584, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Sun, Q. Quan, H. Meng et al., “Enhanced neurite outgrowth on a multiblock conductive nerve scaffold with self-powered electrical stimulation,” Advanced Healthcare Materials, vol. 8, no. 10, article e1900127, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Haastert-Talini and C. Grothe, “Electrical stimulation for promoting peripheral nerve regeneration,” International Review of Neurobiology, vol. 109, pp. 111–124, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Balint, N. J. Cassidy, and S. H. Cartmell, “Conductive polymers: towards a smart biomaterial for tissue engineering,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2341–2353, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. A. Al-Majed, C. M. Neumann, T. M. Brushart, and T. Gordon, “Brief electrical stimulation promotes the speed and accuracy of motor axonal regeneration,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 2602–2608, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
T. M. Brushart, P. N. Hoffman, R. M. Royall, B. B. Murinson, C. Witzel, and T. Gordon, “Electrical stimulation promotes motoneuron regeneration without increasing its speed or conditioning the neuron,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 6631–6638, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. M. Brushart, R. Jari, V. Verge, C. Rohde, and T. Gordon, “Electrical stimulation restores the specificity of sensory axon regeneration,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 221–229, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Asensio-Pinilla, E. Udina, J. Jaramillo, and X. Navarro, “Electrical stimulation combined with exercise increase axonal regeneration after peripheral nerve injury,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 219, no. 1, pp. 258–265, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Gordon, T. M. Brushart, and K. M. Chan, “Augmenting nerve regeneration with electrical stimulation,” Neurological Research, vol. 30, no. 10, pp. 1012–1022, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Haastert-Talini, R. Schmitte, N. Korte, D. Klode, A. Ratzka, and C. Grothe, “Electrical stimulation accelerates axonal and functional peripheral nerve regeneration across long gaps,” Journal of Neurotrauma, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 661–674, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Singh, Q. G. Xu, C. K. Franz et al., “Accelerated axon outgrowth, guidance, and target reinnervation across nerve transection gaps following a brief electrical stimulation paradigm,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 498–512, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Hsu, A. Serio, N. Amdursky, C. Besnard, and M. M. Stevens, “Fabrication of Hemin-doped serum albumin-based fibrous scaffolds for neural tissue engineering applications,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 5305–5317, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Liu, A. L. Miller II, S. Park et al., “Functionalized carbon nanotube and Graphene oxide embedded electrically conductive hydrogel synergistically stimulates nerve cell differentiation,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 9, no. 17, pp. 14677–14690, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Singh, J. Chen, K. K. Koziol et al., “Chitin and carbon nanotube composites as biocompatible scaffolds for neuron growth,” Nanoscale, vol. 8, no. 15, pp. 8288–8299, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Chen, C. Liu, Z. Huang et al., “Preparation of carboxylic graphene oxide-composited polypyrrole conduits and their effect on sciatic nerve repair under electrical stimulation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, vol. 107, no. 12, pp. 2784–2795, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Koppes, K. W. Keating, A. L. McGregor et al., “Robust neurite extension following exogenous electrical stimulation within single walled carbon nanotube-composite hydrogels,” Acta Biomaterialia, vol. 39, pp. 34–43, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ghasemi-Mobarakeh, M. P. Prabhakaran, M. Morshed et al., “Application of conductive polymers, scaffolds and electrical stimulation for nerve tissue engineering,” Journal of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. e17–e35, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Guo and P. X. Ma, “Conducting polymers for tissue engineering,” Biomacromolecules, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1764–1782, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, L. Wang, B. Guo, Y. Shao, and P. X. Ma, “Electroactive biodegradable polyurethane significantly enhanced Schwann cells myelin gene expression and neurotrophin secretion for peripheral nerve tissue engineering,” Biomaterials, vol. 87, pp. 18–31, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Wang, C. Sun, S. Guan et al., “Chitosan/gelatin porous scaffolds assembled with conductive poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanoparticles for neural tissue engineering,” Journal of Materials Chemistry B, vol. 5, no. 24, pp. 4774–4788, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wu, L. Wang, T. Hu, P. X. Ma, and B. Guo, “Conductive micropatterned polyurethane films as tissue engineering scaffolds for Schwann cells and PC12 cells,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 518, pp. 252–262, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Kazemi, A. Ramezani Kakroodi, A. Ameli, T. Filleter, and C. B. Park, “Highly stretchable conductive thermoplastic vulcanizate/carbon nanotube nanocomposites with segregated structure, low percolation threshold and improved cyclic electromechanical performance,” Journal of Materials Chemistry C, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 350–359, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Sambyal, A. Iqbal, J. Hong et al., “Ultralight and mechanically robust Ti₃C₂T_x Hybrid aerogel reinforced by carbon nanotubes for electromagnetic interference shielding,” ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, vol. 11, no. 41, pp. 38046–38054, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. M. Taylor, N. A. Patel, N. C. Freedman, E. Castagnola, and X. T. Cui, “Direct in vivo electrochemical detection of resting dopamine using Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/Carbon Nanotube functionalized microelectrodes,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 91, no. 20, pp. 12917–12927, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. A. Sulaiman and T. Gordon, “Effects of short- and long-term Schwann cell denervation on peripheral nerve regeneration, myelination, and size,” Glia, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 234–246, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ramón-Azcón, S. Ahadian, M. Estili et al., “Dielectrophoretically aligned carbon nanotubes to control electrical and mechanical properties of hydrogels to fabricate contractile muscle myofibers,” Advanced Materials, vol. 25, no. 29, pp. 4028–4034, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Nel, T. Xia, L. Madler, and N. Li, “Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel,” Science, vol. 311, no. 5761, pp. 622–627, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yan, A. Gong, H. He, J. Zhou, Y. Wei, and L. Lv, “Adsorption of microcystins by carbon nanotubes,” Chemosphere, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 142–148, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Bai, I. S. Park, S. J. Lee et al., “Aqueous dispersion of surfactant-modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes and their application as an antibacterial agent,” Carbon, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 3663–3671, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. R. Shin, H. Bae, J. M. Cha et al., “Carbon nanotube reinforced hybrid microgels as scaffold materials for cell encapsulation,” ACS Nano, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 362–372, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Alonso, J. L. A. Rivera, A. M. M. Mendoza, and M. L. H. Mendez, “Effect of temperature and pH on swelling behavior of hydroxyethyl cellullose-acrylamide hydrogel,” e-Polymers, vol. 7, no. 1, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Liem, “Neuronal intermediate filaments,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 86–90, 1990.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Watanabe, Y. Nakamura, Z. Michalak et al., “Serum GFAP and neurofilament light as biomarkers of disease activity and disability in NMOSD,” Neurology, vol. 93, no. 13, pp. e1299–e1311, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Montgomery, S. Ahadian, L. Davenport Huyer et al., “Flexible shape-memory scaffold for minimally invasive delivery of functional tissues,” Nature Materials, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1038–1046, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. L. Loh and C. Choong, “Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size,” Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 485–502, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2020 Zhenhui Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

813

Downloads

1301

Citations