Research Article

Quantitative Evaluation of Articular Involvement of Posterior Malleolus Associated with Operative Indication: A Comparative Study of Six Methods Based on Radiography and CT

Table 3

Agreement between values of any two of the six measurement methods.

Axial CT linearSagittal CT linearAxial CT plane3D CT linear3D CT surface

Plain radiograph linear5.82, −10.75 to 22.38−1.22, −17.89 to 15.46−1.42, −19.69 to 16.84−2.13, −20.52 to 16.258.58, −7.81 to 24.98
Axial CT linear0.21, −8.82 to 9.247.24, 1.21 to 13.28−0.71, −6.26 to 4.8410.00, 3.88 to 16.13
Sagittal CT linear7.03, −1.17 to 15.24−0.92, −10.72 to 8.899.80, 2.87 to 16.73
Axial CT plane−7.95, −15.83 to −0.072.77, 3.02 to 8.55
3D CT linear10.71, 2.72 to 18.71

Data are presented as mean difference (%), Bland–Altman 95% limits of agreement (mean difference ± 1.96 SD) (%).