Review Article

Whole-Body Vibration for Individuals with Reconstructed Anterior Cruciate Ligament: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Summary table of the included studies in the review with main findings.

StudyStudy designDemographicsGraftIntervention protocolWBV interventionFollow-up after interventionResults

Salvarani [33]RCT20 subjects (17 males/3 females)
TG: 10 subjects (; ; )
CG: 10 subjects (; ; )
Patellar tendon1 month after surgery:
TG:
10 sessions
1 daily session/2 weeks
CG: standard + isometrics in the same position of TG
10 sessions 1 daily session/2 weeks
Synchronous vibration
Freq: 30 Hz
Duration: 1 min/repetition, 5 repetitions
Rest: 1 min rest/set
Isometric contraction with position: Knee flexion of 25°
1 weekTG: significant increase in extensor strength after intervention. Significant increase from baseline to follow-up but not between postintervention and follow-up
CG: significant increase in extensor strength after intervention. Significant increase from baseline to follow-up but not between postintervention and follow-up.

Moezy [31]RCT20 male subjects (23 initially, 3 dropped out during intervention, 2 in TG and 1 in CG)
TG: 12 subjects (; ; ; )
CG: 11 subjects (; ; ; )
Patellar tendon12 weeks after surgery:
TG: WBV
12 sessions
3x/week for 1 month
CG: conventional strength, flexibility, and proprioceptive training program
12 sessions
3x/week for 1 month
Synchronous vibration
Parameters changed during intervention
Freq: 30-50 Hz
Duration: 30-60 secs/set
Rest: 30-60secs
Amplitude: 2.5–5 mm
Modality: static-static and dynamic
Session duration: 4-16 min
Position: several exercises, different knee position
NoneTG: significant improvement in overall stability, anteroposterior and mediolateral indexes in opened and closed eye tests. Significant improvements in absolute angular errors in both knees in both testing amplitudes (except in healthy knee at 30°)
CG: significant improvements in overall stability in opened and closed eyes and significant improvement in mediolateral index in closed eye test. No significant differences in proprioceptive acuity. The improvement in stability and proprioceptive acuity scores was significantly higher in the TG, except in absolute angular error in healthy knees at 30°

Fu [30]RCT48 subjects (32 males/16 females, 9 dropped out, 5 in TG and 4 in CG but were included in the analysis)
TG: 24 subjects (18 males, ; ; ; )
CG: 24 subjects (14 males, ; ; ; )
Hamstrings1 month after surgery:
TG: WBV+conventional training
16 sessions
2x/week for 2 months
CG: conventional training
Synchronous vibration
Parameters changed during intervention
Freq: 35-50 Hz
Duration of sets: 30-45 secs
Rest: 15-30 secs
Amplitude: 4 mm
Modality: static-static and dynamic
Session duration: 4-16 min
Position: several exercises, different knee position
3 monthsNo significant differences regarding joint position sense throughout 6 months between groups, in both limbs. With eyes closed, the TG had significantly better overall anteroposterior and mediolateral stability indexes than the CG. The TG evidenced significant improvements in overall anteroposterior and mediolateral stability indexes 3 months after surgery, but the anteroposterior index significantly decreased in the CG.
Reconstructed limb’s knee extensors in the TG evidenced significantly higher peak torques than the CG in all velocities (60, 180, and 300°/s) at 6 months after surgery. Reconstructed limb’s knee flexors in the TG evidenced significantly higher peak torques than the CG at 60 and 300°/s. 3 months after training only the TG evidenced significant improvement in knee extensors and flexors at 300°/s. The TG also evidenced better limb symmetry throughout the rehabilitation process.
The TG performed significantly better in the shuttle run test. In the single-legged hop test, the reconstructed limb in both groups performed significantly better. Subjects in the TG had better limb symmetry throughout the rehabilitation process. No significant differences between both groups regarding triple hop and carioca tests.
No significant differences regarding joint laxity between the two groups and both groups achieved full range of motion.

Berschin [29]RCT40 subjects (29 males/11 females)
TG: 20 subjects (14 males; ; )
CG: 20 subjects (15 males; ; )
Patellar tendon2 weeks after surgery:
TG: WBV exercise protocol average
Unclear number of sessions
3-4x/week for 10 weeks
CG: standard strengthening protocol average
Unclear number of sessions
3-4x/week for 10 weeks
Side alternating vibration
Parameters changed during intervention (3 phases)
Freq: 10-30 Hz
Duration of sets: 1-2 min
Rest: not clearly stated
Amplitude: 5-9 mm
Modality: static-dynamic
Position: slight knee flexion in static, varying in dynamic exercise
NoneRange of motion increased in both groups to full motion with no significant differences between groups.
No significant changes in joint laxity in both groups after intervention.
Extensor and flexor strength improved significantly in both groups with similar results in isometric and isokinetic testing, except for isometric extensor testing at 11 weeks which was significantly higher in the CG. The TG evidenced a significant increase in stability index, but not the CG. Significant differences in this outcome between groups in the 8th and 11th weeks. Knee function (Lysholm score) improved significantly in both groups without significant differences between groups.

Pamukoff [35]Randomized crossover trial20 subjects (6 males, ; ; )16 patellar tendon
3 hamstrings
1 allograft
after surgery
TG: WBV, 1 session
TG2: local muscle vibration, 1 session
CG: no intervention
Synchronous vibration
Freq: 30 Hz
Duration: 1 min/repetition
6 repetitions
Rest: 2 min between repetitions
Amplitude: not stated
Acceleration: 2 g
Modality: static
Position: knee flexion 60°
NoneNo significant changes were observed in the rate of torque development, motor-evoked potential amplitude, -reflex amplitude, hamstrings electromyographic amplitude, and quadriceps -wave amplitude.
Significant improvements in active motor threshold (corticomotor excitability), central activation ratio, quadriceps peak torque, and quadriceps electromyographic amplitude.
Improvements after WBV were not significantly different from those observed in local muscle vibration.

Pistone [32]RCT34 subjects (gender not specified)
TG: 17 subjects (; ; )
CG: 17 subjects (; ; )
Semitendinous1 month after surgery:
TG: traditional rehabilitation program and WBV
5 days/week TRP+12 sessions, 3 sessions/week for 4 weeks, of WBV
CG: traditional rehabilitation program
5 days/week TRP
Synchronous vibration
Freq: optimal vibration frequency—frequency (Hz) with maximal muscle activation
Duration: 1 min/repetition; number of repetitions increased during protocol from 3 to 10
Rest: 1 min between repetitions
Amplitude: 2 mm
Modality: static
Position: knee flexion of 60°
1 monthLimb symmetry index in knee extension MVC increased significantly between baseline and postintervention and between baseline and follow-up in both groups equally. Limb symmetry in knee flexor MVC increased significantly between baseline and follow-up in the CG and between baseline and postintervention, between baseline and follow-up, and between postintervention and follow-up in the TG. LSI of knee flexion in the TG was significantly higher than CG at postintervention and follow-up.
During balance trials with eyes open, significant changes were observed over time in both groups, but at follow-up, the TG performed significantly better. During balance trials with eyes closed, there were no significant changes over time, but at follow-up, the TG performed significantly better.
Improvements in the Lysholm score were greater in TG than in the CG at postintervention and follow-up.

Pamukoff [35]Randomized crossover trial20 subjects (6 males, 21.1 [20.6-21.6] years; 168.4 [164.2-172.6] cm; 68.3 [61.8-74.8] kg)
(mean [95% CI])
16 patellar tendon
3 hamstrings
1 allograft
50.6 (95% CI: 41.3-59.9) months after surgery
TG: WBV, 1 session
TG2: local muscle vibration, 1 session
CG: no intervention
Synchronous vibration
Freq: 30 Hz
Duration: 1 min/repetition
6 repetitions
Rest: 2 min between repetitions
Amplitude: not stated
Acceleration: 2 g
Modality: static
Position: knee flexion 60°
NoneWBV, but not the other conditions, significantly increased the early rate of torque development (0-100 ms) during a maximal isometric knee extension. Late rate of torque development and electromechanical delay has not changed significantly. No differences between conditions were observed after intervention.

Costantino [14]RCT38 female subjects (39 initially, 1 dropped during intervention in the TG)
TG: 19 subjects (; ; ; )
CG: 19 subjects (; ; ; )
Patellar tendon13 weeks after surgery:
TG: 2 static exercises with WBV in addition to the rehabilitation protocol
3 sessions/week for 8 weeks.
CG: 2 static exercises without WBV in addition to the rehabilitation protocol
3 sessions/week for 8 weeks.
Synchronous vibration
Freq: 26 Hz
Duration: 1 min/repetition, 6 repetitions/exercise
Rest: 1 min between repetitions, 2 min between sets
Amplitude: 4 mm
Modality: static
Position: knee flexion of 25°
NoneAll strength parameters (peak torque and maximum power) in knee extensors and knee flexors improved significantly in both groups. TG had a significantly higher improvement than the CG.

Pamukoff [16]Randomized crossover trial20 subjects (15 females, ; ; )10 patellar tendon
7 hamstrings
3 allograft
after surgery
TG: WBV, 1 session
CG: no intervention
Synchronous vibration
Freq: 30 Hz
Duration: 1 min/repetition
6 repetitions
Rest: 2 min between repetitions
Amplitude: not stated
Acceleration: 2 g
Modality: static
Position: knee flexion 60°
NoneWBV vibration significantly increased knee flexion excursion in the injured limb but not loading rate, peak knee flexion angle, peak knee flexion moment, and peak vertical ground reaction force.
Subjects with more baseline impairment had larger changes in knee flexion excursion.

da Costa [15]RCT44 male subjects (48 initially, 4 dropped out during evaluation due to fatigue and/or discomfort, before intervention)
TG: 22 subjects (; ; )
CG: 22 subjects (; ; )
Gracilis-semitendinosusPostoperative time:
TG:
CG:
TG: WBV squat
1 session
CG: squat without vibration
Synchronous vibration
Freq: 50 Hz
Duration: 10 sets of 30 secs
Rest: 30 secs between sets
Amplitude: 4 mm
Modality: static
Position: knee flexion of 40°
NoneNo significant improvements in any of the outcome variables (peak torque, total work, electromyographic activity, and oscillation of the centre of pressure) and no significant differences between groups were observed.

RCT: randomized controlled trial; COP: centre of pressure; Freq: frequency; CG: control group; LSI: limb symmetry index; MVC: maximal voluntary contraction; TG: training group; ROM: range of motion; TRP: traditional rehabilitation program; WBV: whole-body vibration.